A Methodological Process for the Design of Frameworks Oriented to Infotainment User Interfaces
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The paper is well written and organized.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is very interesting, nevertheless it needs extra effort.
The Authors may include short description of various types of literature review as in https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226062 The Authors should not follow the guidelines provided by Kitchenham only.
Why the Authors excluded Scopus, WoS? ACM, IEEE and Taylor and Francis are indexed in those databases as well.
Moreover Likert scale is not referenced.
For what reason was 2015 used as the starting year for the analyses?
The figures are of quite low quality - they should be developed.
The manuscript is not entirely formatted according to the guidelines.
Research limitations, answers for research questions and future research should be mentioned in the manuscript.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
Please explain the selection of respondents in the survey (criteria for selection of respondents, number of respondents, random selection? ...). Also, it would be interesting to see the correlations of respondents ’responses by survey questions, in relation to their area of expertise.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors answered all the doubts and questions; therefore, the manuscript can be accepted for publication in the current form.