Next Article in Journal
Determining the Optimum Level of Soil Olsen Phosphorus and Phosphorus Fertilizer Application for High Phosphorus-Use Efficiency in Zea mays L. in Black Soil
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 and Policy Impacts on the Bangladesh Rice Market and Food Security
Previous Article in Special Issue
Internet of Vehicles Empowered Mobile Media: Research on Mobile-Generated Content (MoGC) for Intelligent Connected Vehicles
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Methodological Process for the Design of Frameworks Oriented to Infotainment User Interfaces

Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 5982; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115982
by Carlos-Alberto Domínguez-Báez 1,*, Ricardo Mendoza-González 1,*, Huizilopoztli Luna-García 2,*, Mario Alberto Rodríguez-Díaz 1, Francisco Javier Luna-Rosas 1, Julio César Martínez-Romo 1, José M. Celaya-Padilla 2, Jorge I. Galván-Tejada 2, Carlos E. Galván-Tejada 2 and Hamurabi Gamboa-Rosales 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 5982; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115982
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 15 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 26 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infotainment Systems and Intelligent Vehicles)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well written and organized.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is very interesting, nevertheless it needs extra effort.

The Authors may include short description of various types of literature review as in https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226062 The Authors should not follow the guidelines provided by Kitchenham only.

Why the Authors excluded Scopus, WoS? ACM, IEEE and Taylor and Francis are indexed in those databases as well.

Moreover Likert scale is not referenced.

 

For what reason was 2015 used as the starting year for the analyses?

 

The figures are of quite low quality - they should be developed.

 

The manuscript is not entirely formatted according to the guidelines.

 

Research limitations, answers for research questions and future research should be mentioned in the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please explain the selection of respondents in the survey (criteria for selection of respondents, number of respondents, random selection? ...). Also, it would be interesting to see the correlations of respondents ’responses by survey questions, in relation to their area of expertise.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors answered all the doubts and questions; therefore, the manuscript can be accepted for publication in the current form.

Back to TopTop