Next Article in Journal
Intercropping Halophytes to Mitigate Salinity Stress in Watermelon
Next Article in Special Issue
Economic–Environmental Sustainability in Building Projects: Introducing Risk and Uncertainty in LCCE and LCCA
Previous Article in Journal
Collaboration, Adaptation, and Scaling: Perspectives on Environmental Governance for Sustainability
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Methodology for the Selection of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods in Real Estate and Land Management Processes
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2018, 10(3), 680; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030680

Optimal Cost–Quality Trade-Off Model for Differentiating Presale Housing Quality Strategies

Department of Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 January 2018 / Revised: 27 February 2018 / Accepted: 27 February 2018 / Published: 2 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Real Estate Economics, Management and Investments)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1850 KB, uploaded 2 March 2018]   |  

Abstract

Housing quality (HQ) has been a long-standing concern for both developers and homebuyers. Currently, HQ depends on the expected profit and subjectivity of the developers, and homebuyers only have a passive choice of whether to accept housing with such quality. Asian housing supply markets have largely adopted the presale housing system. Under this system, developers are able to verify future occupants before commencing construction, enabling them to provide customized designs and differentiated quality items in order to meet user demands and value. Consequently, HQ can be enhanced. A cost–quality trade-off model was developed using a genetic algorithm to help decision-makers identify the optimal HQ differentiation strategy that simultaneously satisfies homebuyers’ expectations of quality and developers’ expectations of profits. The findings showed that the presale housing system effectively improves HQ. A 6% increase in homebuyers’ budgets can achieve the optimal quality improvement effect, while an 8% or more increase in developers’ construction costs in order to improve HQ can generate an additional premium for the developers. View Full-Text
Keywords: cost–quality trade-off; differentiation strategies; housing quality; presale housing; genetic algorithm (GA) cost–quality trade-off; differentiation strategies; housing quality; presale housing; genetic algorithm (GA)
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Juan, Y.-K.; Lin, I.-C. Optimal Cost–Quality Trade-Off Model for Differentiating Presale Housing Quality Strategies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 680.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top