Next Article in Journal
Climate-Induced Northerly Expansion of Siberian Silkmoth Range
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Water Content on Sources of Heterotrophic Soil Respiration
Article Menu
Issue 8 (August) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2017, 8(8), 297; doi:10.3390/f8080297

Comparison of Heat Transfer and Soil Impacts of Air Curtain Burner Burning and Slash Pile Burning

1
Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
2
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1221 South Main, Moscow, ID 83843, USA
3
Department of Forestry and Wildland Resources, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 July 2017 / Revised: 6 August 2017 / Accepted: 10 August 2017 / Published: 16 August 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1701 KB, uploaded 16 August 2017]   |  

Abstract

We measured soil heating and subsequent changes in soil properties between two forest residue disposal methods: slash pile burning (SPB) and air curtain burner (ACB). The ACB consumes fuels more efficiently and safely via blowing air into a burning container. Five burning trials with different fuel sizes were implemented in northern California, USA. Soil temperature was measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 cm depth. Immediately after burning, soil samples from two depths (0–10 and 10–20 cm) and ash samples were collected for analyzing organic matter; carbon and nitrogen content; and calcium, magnesium, and potassium concentrations. The highest temperature observed was 389 °C at 1 cm depth under the SPB. Mean peak temperatures were 133.2 °C and 162.2 °C for ACB and SPB, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in peak temperatures and duration of lethal soil temperatures (total minutes over 60 °C) between ACB and SPB. Heat transfer decreased rapidly as the soil depth increased. There is little evidence that any subsequent changes in soil chemical properties occurred, concluding that these small-scale burns had few negative impacts at our study site. Therefore, given the lack of extreme soil heating and more efficient and safer woody residue reduction, the ACB may be more effective than open SPB, especially where fire escape or long-term fire damage to soils are of concern. View Full-Text
Keywords: forest residue management; woody biomass utilization; soil temperature profile; soil productivity; thermocouple forest residue management; woody biomass utilization; soil temperature profile; soil productivity; thermocouple
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, W.; Page-Dumroese, D.S.; Han, H.-S. Comparison of Heat Transfer and Soil Impacts of Air Curtain Burner Burning and Slash Pile Burning. Forests 2017, 8, 297.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top