Next Article in Journal
An Examination of Diameter Density Prediction with k-NN and Airborne Lidar
Next Article in Special Issue
Certifying Forests to Achieve Sustainability in Industrial Plantations: Opinions of Stakeholders in Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Spore Dispersal Patterns of Fusarium circinatum on an Infested Monterey Pine Forest in North-Western Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Forest Certification and Country of Origin: Choice Experiment Analysis of Outdoor Decking Material Selection in E-Commerce Market in Finland
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2017, 8(11), 445; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8110445

Private Forest Governance, Public Policy Impacts: The Forest Stewardship Council in Russia and Brazil

1
Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
2
Department of Government and Legal Studies, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 August 2017 / Revised: 29 September 2017 / Accepted: 10 November 2017 / Published: 16 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Forest Management and Forest Certification)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1269 KB, uploaded 16 November 2017]   |  

Abstract

Under what conditions do private forest governance standards influence state policy and behavior to become more oriented toward sustainability? We argue that governance schemes targeting firms may indirectly shape state behavior, even when designed to bypass state regulation. Through an examination of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in Russia and Brazil, we find that the FSC has influenced domestic rhetoric, laws, and enforcement practices. FSC has had a more disruptive and consequential impact on Russia’s domestic forest governance; in Brazil, earlier transnational environmental campaigns had already begun to shift domestic institutions toward sustainability. Based on interview data and textual analysis of FSC and government documents, we identify the mechanisms of indirect FSC influence on states—professionalization, civil society mobilization, firm lobbying, and international market pressure, and argue that they are likely to be activated under conditions of poor and decentralized governance, overlapping and competing regulations and high foreign market demand for exports. View Full-Text
Keywords: forests; certification; private governance; Russia; Brazil forests; certification; private governance; Russia; Brazil
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sundstrom, L.M.; Henry, L.A. Private Forest Governance, Public Policy Impacts: The Forest Stewardship Council in Russia and Brazil. Forests 2017, 8, 445.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top