Next Article in Journal
Pattern and Drivers of White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Herbivory on Tree Saplings across a Plateau Landscape
Previous Article in Journal
The Speed of Invasion: Rates of Spread for Thirteen Exotic Forest Insects and Diseases
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2016, 7(5), 100; doi:10.3390/f7050100

Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skogsmarksgränd, Umeå, 90183, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Maarten Nieuwenhuis and Timothy A. Martin
Received: 1 March 2016 / Revised: 15 April 2016 / Accepted: 29 April 2016 / Published: 5 May 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [912 KB, uploaded 5 May 2016]   |  

Abstract

Long-term forest management planning often involves several stakeholders with conflicting objectives, creating a complex decision process. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) presents a promising framework for finding solutions in terms of suitable trade-offs among the objectives. However, many of the MCDA methods that have been implemented in forest management planning can only be used to compare and evaluate a limited number of management plans, which increases the risk that the most suitable plan is not included in the decision process. The aim of this study is to test whether the combination of two MCDA methods can facilitate the evaluation of a large number of strategic forest management plans in a situation with multiple objectives and several stakeholders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to set weights for objectives based on stakeholder preferences and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was used to produce an overall ranking of alternatives. This approach was applied to a case study of the Vilhelmina municipality, northern Sweden. The results show that the combination of AHP and TOPSIS is easy to implement in participatory forest planning and takes advantage of the capacity of forest decision support systems to create a wide array of management plans. This increases the possibility that the most suitable plan for all stakeholders will be identified. View Full-Text
Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process; forest decision support system; forest management; the Heureka system; multiple criteria decision analysis; multiple objectives; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Analytic Hierarchy Process; forest decision support system; forest management; the Heureka system; multiple criteria decision analysis; multiple objectives; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nilsson, H.; Nordström, E.-M.; Öhman, K. Decision Support for Participatory Forest Planning Using AHP and TOPSIS. Forests 2016, 7, 100.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top