Next Article in Journal
Spatial Patterns of Irradiance and Advanced Reproduction along a Canopy Disturbance Severity Gradient in an Upland Hardwood Stand
Previous Article in Journal
The Urban Environment Can Modify Drought Stress of Small-Leaved Lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) and Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decision Support for the Provision of Ecosystem Services under Climate Change: An Editorial
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2016, 7(3), 72;

The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports

Atrium Forest Consulting, Piracicaba, 13416-380, Brazil
Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea 901 83, Sweden
Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 49, Alnarp 23053, Sweden
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Harald Vacik, Jose Borges, Jordi Garcia-Gonzalo and Ljusk-Ola Eriksson
Received: 12 January 2016 / Revised: 1 March 2016 / Accepted: 10 March 2016 / Published: 21 March 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1634 KB, uploaded 21 March 2016]   |  


From 2009 to 2013, a group of more than 100 researchers from 26 countries, under a COST-Action project named FORSYS, worked on a review of the use of forest management decision support systems (FMDSS). Guided by a template, local researchers conducted assessments of FMDSS use in their countries; their results were documented in Country Reports. In this study, we have used the Country Reports to construct a summary of FMDSS use. For the purposes of our analysis, we conducted a two-round categorisation of the main themes to describe the most relevant aspects of FMDSS use. The material produced was used to generate quantitative summaries of (i) the types of problem where FMDSS are used, (ii) models and methods used to solve these problems, (iii) knowledge management techniques, and (iv) participatory planning techniques. Beyond this, a qualitative analysis identified and summarised the local researchers’ primary concerns, recorded in the conclusions to the Country Reports; we designated these “lessons learned”. Results from the quantitative analysis suggested that most of the participant countries were making use of latest generation FMDSS. A few did not have practical problems that justified the use of such technology or they were still at the beginning of the process of building models to solve their own forest problems. View Full-Text
Keywords: decision support systems; forest management; information technology in forestry decision support systems; forest management; information technology in forestry

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nobre, S.; Eriksson, L.-O.; Trubins, R. The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports. Forests 2016, 7, 72.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top