Next Article in Journal
Allometric Models Based on Bayesian Frameworks Give Better Estimates of Aboveground Biomass in the Miombo Woodlands
Previous Article in Journal
An Integer Programming Model to Determine Land Use Trajectories for Optimizing Regionally Integrated Ecosystem Services Delivery
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Forests 2016, 7(2), 34; doi:10.3390/f7020034

Financial Mechanisms to Improve the Supply of Ecosystem Services from Privately-Owned Australian Native Forests

1
School of Ecosystem & Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, 4 Water St, Creswick, VIC 3363, Australia
2
CSIRO Land and Water, Private Bag 2, Urrbrae, South Australia 5064, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Thomas J. Straka and Eric J. Jokela
Received: 1 September 2015 / Revised: 26 January 2016 / Accepted: 26 January 2016 / Published: 3 February 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1943 KB, uploaded 3 February 2016]   |  

Abstract

Much of Australia’s native forest is privately-owned and is needing investment to maintain and improve the supply of a wide range of ecosystem services. This paper reviews mechanisms presently used in Australia to improve the supply of ecosystem services, with particular emphasis on financial mechanisms. Auction, green bond and biobanking schemes are widely and, so far, successfully used in a number of States, especially in projects where the actions required and ecosystem services can be readily measured. Measurement of biodiversity and biodiversity-based services remains problematic, despite some fairly widespread application of different measurement systems. Inadequate or variable measurement systems could engender a loss of investor interest if equivalence or gains cannot be appropriately verified. A new Biodiversity Investment Scheme is proposed, based on the structure used commercially in Managed Investment Schemes. The choice of mechanism, however, will be mainly determined by landowner attitudes to assignment of property rights, and by scale, the extent of public versus private consumption goods, and the transaction costs and risks. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecosystem services; biodiversity; auctions; bio-banking; green bonds; managed investment schemes; property rights; public consumption goods; risks ecosystem services; biodiversity; auctions; bio-banking; green bonds; managed investment schemes; property rights; public consumption goods; risks
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferguson, I.; Levetan, L.; Crossman, N.D.; Bennett, L.T. Financial Mechanisms to Improve the Supply of Ecosystem Services from Privately-Owned Australian Native Forests. Forests 2016, 7, 34.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top