Next Article in Journal
Multi-Scalar Governance for Restoring the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: A Case Study on Small Landholdings in Protected Areas of Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Roles of Swedish Forestry in the Context of Climate Change Mitigation
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Forests 2014, 5(4), 579-598; doi:10.3390/f5040579

Local Participation in REDD+: Lessons from the Eastern Brazilian Amazon

1
Center for International Forestry Research, Rua do Russel 450, Sala 601, CEP: 22210-010 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
2
State University of Santa Catarina, Av. Madre Benvenuta 2007, CEP: 88035-001, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 January 2014 / Revised: 5 March 2014 / Accepted: 17 March 2014 / Published: 3 April 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [901 KB, uploaded 3 April 2014]   |  

Abstract

There are concerns that local people will not be genuinely involved in initiatives to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). We analyzed local participation in the design of one REDD+ project in the eastern Brazilian Amazon, and assessed local hopes, worries and recommendations for the project through four community focus groups and interviews with 137 households at the site. Our results showed that only one-third of households interviewed (31%) had enough information about the project to describe it accurately. Of those, the majority (60%) hoped that the project would improve their incomes, followed by improving their agricultural production (33%) and helping protect forests (26%). While increasing household incomes was the dominant hope, people’s recommendations revealed that they favored non-monetary forms of compensation over the direct cash payments included in the proponents’ package of incentives. Their main recommendation was that the project should help improve their production systems through access to technical assistance, machinery and training, while valuing local production systems (46%). Our study highlights the need for participation that goes beyond passive consultation with local people to develop REDD+ interventions that best reflect local knowledge, land use practices and aspirations. View Full-Text
Keywords: deforestation; degradation; climate change mitigation; safeguards; livelihoods; participation; equity; benefit sharing deforestation; degradation; climate change mitigation; safeguards; livelihoods; participation; equity; benefit sharing
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cromberg, M.; Duchelle, A.E.; Rocha, I.O. Local Participation in REDD+: Lessons from the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. Forests 2014, 5, 579-598.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Forests EISSN 1999-4907 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top