Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
Forests 2011, 2(1), 66-85; doi:10.3390/f2010066
Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil
Centro de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Universidade de Brasília, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, CET/CDS, Bloco C, Brasília, DF, CEP 70904-970, Brasil
Received: 15 November 2010; in revised form: 27 December 2010 / Accepted: 29 December 2010 / Published: 5 January 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Governance and REDD: Challenges for Policies and Markets in Latin America)
Download PDF Full-Text [179 KB, uploaded 5 January 2011 11:06 CET]
Abstract: Recent discussions on REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, plus conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks) have raised optimism about reducing carbon emissions and deforestation in tropical countries. If approved under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), REDD+ mechanisms may generate a substantial influx of financial resources to developing countries. Some authors argue that this money could reverse the ongoing process of decentralization of forest policies that has spread through a large number of developing countries in the past two decades. Central states will be accountable for REDD+ money, and may be compelled to control and keep a significant share of REDD+ funds. Supporters of decentralization argue that centralized implementation of REDD+ will be ineffective and inefficient. In this paper, I examine the relation between subnational governments and REDD+ in Brazil. Data show that some state governments in the Brazilian Amazon have played a key role in creating protected areas (PAs) after 2003, which helped decrease deforestation rates. Governors have different stimuli for creating PAs. Some respond to the needs of their political constituency; others have expectations to boost the forest sector so as to increase fiscal revenues. Governors also have led the discussion on REDD+ in Brazil since 2008. Considering their interests and political power, REDD+ is unlikely to curb decentralization in Brazil.
Keywords: Brazil; Amazonia; tropical forests; decentralization; protected areas; REDD+; subnational governments; federalism
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
MDPI and ACS Style
Toni, F. Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil. Forests 2011, 2, 66-85.AMA Style
Toni F. Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil. Forests. 2011; 2(1):66-85.Chicago/Turabian Style
Toni, Fabiano. 2011. "Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil." Forests 2, no. 1: 66-85.