Next Article in Journal
Responses of Soil Phosphorus Cycling-Related Microbial Genes to Thinning Intensity in Cunninghamia lanceolata Plantations
Previous Article in Journal
The Process of Patchy Expansion for Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) at the Bamboo–Broadleaf Forest Interface: Spreading and Filling in Order
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping Coniferous Forest Distribution in a Semi-Arid Area Based on Multi-Classifier Fusion and Google Earth Engine Combining Gaofen-1 and Sentinel-1 Data: A Case Study in Northwestern Liaoning, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/f15030439
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Geoinformatics in Forest Planning and Management

by
Jiani Xing
,
Shufa Sun
*,
Qiuhua Huang
,
Zhuchenxi Chen
and
Zixuan Zhou
College of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(3), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030439
Submission received: 5 January 2024 / Revised: 14 February 2024 / Accepted: 20 February 2024 / Published: 25 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Applications in Remote Sensing and GIS to Forest Management and Planning)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rational forest planning and management is the key to a forest’s systematic construction. It is beneficial to many aspects, such as the cultivation and preservation of a forest’s ecological resources, sustainability, forest fire prevention, and others. In recent years, some effective strategies and tactics for the planning and management of forests’ systematic construction have been established. Among them, the application of geoinformatics in forest planning and management (AGFPM) is one of the most effective and promising strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive summary and analysis of the current situation. AGFPM has effectively applied in logging operations, forest road development, forest material transport, and forest fire prevention. An analysis of the research results in the past 20 years showed that decision support tools are the most used solutions to problems related to forest planning and management, especially the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is the second most popular method. With the development of geoinformatics, it will play an increasingly important role in forest planning and management in the future.

1. Introduction

Forests are critical ecosystems, providing habitats for most of the planet’s species and livelihoods for humans. For example, forested watersheds provide most of the world’s accessible freshwater resources—a critical source of the water we drink and use daily. Additionally, as carbon sinks, healthy forests play a crucial role in mitigating climate change. According to the State of the World’s Forests 2022, issued by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), sustainable forestry should be adopted under which humans can generate decent incomes and conserve forests.
Forest planning and management is very important in promoting a forest’s systematic construction, which can effectively promote the forest’s economic development. In recent years, international researchers have paid more attention to the long-term economic benefits of forests in their research, mostly from the perspective of sustainable development. This has included, for example, research on forest fire prevention, forest road construction, rational harvesting, and so on. Laschi et al. [1] summarized the research from various countries on improving forest fire roads, such as using the entropy weighting coefficient (EWC) method for planning forest roads in fire-prone environments, using the operational difficulty index in firefighting (ODIF) to analyze the factors affecting the efficiency of firefighting, and using ring roads that allow firefighting vehicles to move along the edge of a fire more quickly. Simonenkova et al. [2] proposed an optimization method considering forest road construction and transportation costs. They used a mathematical model based on the multi-commodity flow model to solve the road network layout for an extensive forest. This method can greatly reduce the optimal path’s solution time while maintaining the results’ accuracy. Caliskan [3] used a convolutional neural network (CNN) method to assess the road network taken from high-resolution orthophotos to monitor forest road infrastructure continuously. Luo et al. [4] designed a mixed-integer linear programming model to maximize the benefits of a forest’s supply chain. This model combines a long planning period of forest management strategy with a short planning period of sawmill operation strategy to improve the net present value of forest management and wood processing operations. Over the past few decades, heuristic techniques such as genetic algorithms (GAs), simulated annealing (SA), and Tabu search (TS) have been applied to solve forest planning issues. With their increasing computational power, researchers have started to utilize more accurate solutions such as integer linear programming and mixed-integer linear programming.
Current challenges in forest planning and management include reducing the environmental impact of forest operations, improving tree growth and increasing economic benefits. Therefore, researchers have developed various decision-making tools to address the complexities of forest planning and management from economic, ecological, and social perspectives. For example, Zhou [5] thoroughly reviewed the current situation of forest city cluster development in China. He proposed specific countermeasures for forest city cluster construction from comprehensive planning concepts, evaluation index systems, and functional zoning based on natural conditions and development needs. Through this research, regional ecological environment problems were effectively solved. Michael et al. [6] investigated methods to use forest inventory data to help manage biodiversity and to monitor, assess, and plan for it. Cammerino [7] and Woo et al. [8] investigated the application of multi-criteria decision-making in forest management and discussed the application potential of the method. Also, other researchers have focused on evaluating advanced approaches that may address ecosystem services.
In addition to the above research, more researchers have been focusing on using geoinformatics to solve the problems in forest construction. The most frequently used include geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing (RS), which focus on solving the issues of timeliness and spatiality in forest survey and monitoring. For example, Caliska [9] utilized GIS with spatial multi-criteria decision-making (S-MCDM) to plan forest roads by incorporating five environmental indices into the design: avalanche, river, soil, geology, and slope. This method ultimately produced the most efficient and least costly road network. Using GIS, Sanchez-García [10] and Mishra et al. [11] conducted several spatial assessments to choose forest sites. Kulimushi et al. [12] used the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) with GIS and RS data to evaluate soil erosion and environmental damage. Overall, geoinformatics covers a range from spatial analysis to statistical modeling and can be used to solve different problems, thus stimulating researchers’ interests.
In general, although the research on geoinformatics has been very enthusiastic in recent years and achieved many results, there is a lack of relevant literature to summarize these research results. Because geoinformatics has a broad scope, this paper primarily focuses on GIS technology and the RS technology frequently used in conjunction with it. We reviewed the relevant literature on applying these technologies for forest construction. Then, we summarized the current research progress and achievements of researchers from the perspectives of forest planning and management. The primary purpose of this review is, firstly, to provide a systematic summary and supplementation of current research. Secondly, our goal is to emphasize the importance of applying GIS and RS technologies in forest construction. Thirdly, we wish to identify current research gaps and propose focused research directions to support researchers in their future manuscripts.

2. Methods

2.1. Literature Review

This paper reviewed the literature to discuss the application of geoinformatics in forest planning and management. A systematic review identifies and evaluates multiple studies on a topic using a clearly defined methodology. We searched for relevant studies to retrieve as many relevant scientific publications dealing with geoinformatics application in forest planning and management in 2004–2023 (20 years). However, one of the challenging issues in conducting a literature review is that it is impractical to read each paper. Therefore, we followed specific guidelines and defined the search scope clearly. This paper applied the search regulations shown in Table 1. This review consists of three main steps. In Step 1, we searched terms and their combinations to seek references of GIS in forest planning and management from the Science Index (SCI), Engineering Index (EI), and China National Knowledge Network Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. In Step 2, we examined their abstracts to identify papers that met the requirements of the topic. In Step 3, we studied the full texts selected in Step 2 to obtain their central research methodology and vision.
To organize the application of GIS in forest planning and management, this review presents the following research questions:
(1)
How much research has been conducted to develop decision support tools or computer systems to enable forest planning and management?
(2)
How many papers have used GIS in combination with three-dimensional (3D) simulation, LiDAR, and hotspot detection in forest fire prevention, forest road planning, and forest management, and do other methods exist?
(3)
How many papers have used heuristic algorithms for forest planning and management?
(4)
In addition to the mainstream research directions, what other aspects of forest construction have been studied by experts and scholars using GIS?
(5)
What research contributions were accomplished in this manuscript?
(6)
What are the current research trends, gaps, and emerging research topics within GIS for forests?

2.2. Data Collection and Inclusion Criteria

Entering the words “GIS” and “forest” into the databases yielded 12,197 results from the SCI database, 6210 from the EI database, and 374 from the CNKI database. To narrow our search, we specified the following terms in the title, abstract, or keywords of the articles: “forest road network planning”, “forest fire fighting”, “forest management”, “forest material transport”, “timber harvesting”, and “forest resource”. To obtain accurate information, we superimposed keywords with two or three attributes for searching. For example, we searched “forest fire” and “GIS” simultaneously so that the results would be more accurate. Finally, this manuscript referenced more than 130 papers. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of these papers by publication year. The horizontal coordinate represents the year from 2004 to 2023, and the vertical coordinate indicates the number of papers published. The analysis in this manuscript is more biased toward papers published after 2013, as there has been a noticeable increase in the number of studies over the past 20 years, particularly since 2013.
A total of 195 keywords were listed when the literature was organized. Most of them were used only once, accounting for about 79% of all keywords. Figure 2 demonstrates the frequently occurring keywords. Ultimately, we categorized the keywords that showed up more than three times. As in Figure 3, the horizontal coordinate indicates the frequency of a keyword’s usage, while the vertical coordinate shows the different keywords. With 34 occurrences, “GIS” was the most common keyword in these publications, followed by “forest roads”, “forest fires”, “AHP”, and “forest harvesting”, which were all mentioned 10−6 times apiece. Furthermore, we compiled some frequently used keywords under each main topic, as indicated in Table 2, because the keywords used in publications on the same subject may have changed. These keywords also indicate the current research focus.
The collected papers were published in 55 different scientific journals or conferences. The number of articles accounted for 28% of published articles. They mainly come from the journals “Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering”, “Environmental Monitoring and Assessment”, “Forests”, and “Remote Sensing”. These papers covered a wide range of 20 scientific disciplines. Figure 4 shows the percentage of the disciplinary categories of these journals represented. “Agricultural Science and Technology”, making up 23% of the journals, was the most defined disciplinary category among them. The order of “Environmental Science”, “Computer Science”, “Operations Research and Management Science”, and “Multidisciplinary Science” is 18%, 14%, and 10%, respectively. Regarding impact, 69.6% of the papers were cited at least once in the same period. One of the most cited papers, with 218 citations, focused on the spatial modeling of tropical forest fire sensitivity using a novel hybrid intelligence approach. These more than 130 papers generated 2132 citations over 20 years, an average of 106 citations per year and 4.3 citations per publication.

2.3. Thematic Distribution of Articles

To better assess the focus proposed by the authors of the papers, we categorized and merged the retrieved articles into two focus subjects. Figure 5 presents the themes of GIS applications in forest planning and management in different years. Between 2004 and 2023, most papers discussed forest planning, including its subthemes of forest fire planning, forest road planning, etc. This implied that designing effective forest infrastructure and forest road networks were given a lot of attention. Forest management concerned material transportation, harvesting operations, and resource distribution. In contrast, the percentage of papers with directions on disaster recovery and heuristic algorithms was not yet very high. More recently, research on forest supply chains could also be found in selected journals, with “operational systems analysis and modeling” being the second most frequent subtopic. Most academic research on forests that had currently been conducted focused more on the application level, with an emphasis on finding solutions to issues that arose to increase these areas’ economic benefits further. Also, most of the published papers used GIS technology in combination with computer programs, algorithms, decision support systems, laser detection technology, etc., to solve problems. This illustrates that GIS serves more as an auxiliary technology to help some other technology perform their roles better.

3. Construction of Forests in Countries around the World

According to pertinent data, the construction of forest roads began in the 18th to 19th centuries. At that time, with the rise of the Industrial Revolution in Europe and the increasing demand for timber in the market, Austria and Germany began to build forest roads to facilitate timber transportation. Owing to the 1840s, many miners entered the forest and created a network of forest roads. In 1889, Japan began constructing forest roads to harvest natural forests. After the 20th century, the construction of forest roads in most countries entered a peak period of development, and led by Germany, Austria, and Finland, European countries joined the golden period of the timber industry. The introduction of four-wheel drive further promoted the construction of forest roads on a larger scale in Australia. In contrast, Korea’s forest road construction started later, from the second half of when the 20th century began to build to the 1990s, to enter its stage of full promotion.
Due to the lack of scientific planning in the early phases of forest road construction, several nations expanded irresponsibly, which damaged the ecological environment. As the number of forest roads increased, the road density gradually reached each country’s standard. The construction of new roads was curtailed into the maintenance of existing roads instead. The functions of forest roads have expanded from harvesting and transportation to forest fire prevention and forest recreation. They are also used as highways in some countries.
Therefore, various countries have formulated relevant regulations to managing forests. Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 show the division and management of forest roads in some representative countries [13,14,15,16,17]. Most countries, such as Germany, France, Russia, Japan, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia, divided their forest roads into three grades. Forest roads in these countries have the same in function despite differences in specifications and definitions: Grade I forest road—a main road, which can be used by heavy trucks, is a two-lane paved road with a high transportation volume; Grade II forest road—subordinate road (or feeder road), connecting the main road and the skid road for large- and medium-sized trucks to pass, is the particular road for transporting timber, generally for two-lane or single-lane paved roads, and the transportation volume is medium; Grade III forest road—skid roads for harvesting collection and afforestation operation, including mostly single-lane dirt roads, narrow roads, only for small vehicles to pass, and the transportation volume is small.
In addition to Grade I–III forest roads, European countries such as Germany also have a small number of forest roads for public recreation. In Russia, temporary roads are used to transport timber in the winter by making use of frozen rivers or paving roads in swamps. And New Zealand also has temporary roads during afforestation. In contrast, the division of forest roads in Australia is more complicated and is divided into five grades according to specifications. Among them, grades I–III are all haul roads, grade IV is the harvesting road, and grade V is the particular road for forest firefighting, as shown in Table 4 [14,15]. The United States is more special in saving money and reducing the environmental impact; the forest roads are divided into five grades according to their function and level of maintenance, as shown in Table 5 [16,17].
The forest road was divided into four grades in China. Grade I or II forest roads are often designated as the main road and linking-up road, respectively, while other roads were selected as Grade III or IV according to specific conditions [13]. The grades, specifications, and functions of forest roads in China are shown in Table 7. However, due to the influence of natural, economic, social, and other issues, the construction of forest roads in China is seriously lagging. The average density of Chinese main forest roads is less than 1.5 m/hm2, and in some remote areas, less than 1 m/hm2, which is at a lower level worldwide. The low density of forest roads and their insufficient maintenance have seriously affected the development of forestry.

4. Application of Geoinformatics in Forest Planning

4.1. Application in Forest Fire Prevention

Fire is highly harmful to forests and the second factor leading to ecosystem degradation after agriculture and urban activities (air pollution, noise pollution, etc.). Preventing forest fires and rationally planning forest fire roads are the most important aspects of maintaining forest safety [18].

4.1.1. Simulating Fire Spreading Trends and Delineating Fire Risk Zones

It is challenging to forecast the spread of forest fires because of their multi-component character and the influence of topography and meteorology [19]. So, numerous researchers approach their research from the standpoint of maximizing the forest fire spread model. Currently, the Rothermel model of the United States, the McArthur model of Australia, the forest fire spread model of Canada, the Wang Zhengfei model of China, and the modified models based on these models are the most common application models for predicting the spread of forest fires. Cellular automata, Huygen’s principle, and fractal theory have been used to solve the models. The forest fire is simulated from the three dimensions and displayed on the GIS platform. This method enables the visualization of the simulation and improves its prediction accuracy, as shown in Figure 6 [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Constraints are added in the solution process to determine the optimal firefighting position with less input and shorter time [25].
In conclusion, the 3D simulation of forest fire spread considers the influence of combustible materials, weather, terrain, and other environmental factors. It can visually show the pattern of the fire’s progress and serve as a guide for creating fire suppression tactics [26]. However, the accuracy level of this method still needs to be improved. In the future, researchers could deploy transducers in fire hazardous areas and utilize real-time data to correct the forest fire spread boundary. They could also incorporate fire suppression features for simulation.
In addition to the above methods, some researchers have chosen to use comprehensive evaluation (CE) to assess the risk of forest fires [27], including the gray fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, quadratic entropy weight method, fire risk index model, information diffusion theory, and AHP [28,29,30,31]. Statistics also have been used, including the vegetation type, roads, slope inclination, etc., to construct a fire risk model and divide fire risk zones. This can provide a reference basis for forest fire management [32,33,34,35,36,37].

4.1.2. Assisting in the Realization of Forest Fire Monitoring and Early Warning

As early as the 1990s, some researchers proposed producing fire risk maps for forest fire initiation and spread factors. Some contemporary researchers use RS technology to extract ecological indicators such as the surface water content, temperature, vegetation index, etc., for hotspot detection when collecting data, for example, satellite data such as GEOS/VAS, NOAA/AVHRR, MODIS/EOS, TM, and DMSP. Barbosa [38] interacted with satellite hotspots generated by RS and risk areas indicated in fire susceptibility maps to highlight the hotspots with the highest danger level. The outcomes are displayed in Figure 7. The advantage of this method is classification based on the susceptibility index. It can effectively detect medium and high susceptibility in low-susceptibility areas to avoid miscalculations and make forest fire detection more accurate. Salsabila et al. [39] utilized RS data to develop fire mitigation measures by identifying factors that caused fires through spatial hotspot analysis of fire locations. Jeefoo [40] proposed a mobile GIS platform that uses the Client/Server GIS framework to develop a standalone smartphone application. This application gathers fire conditions, sends them to administrators, and displays them on a network base station.
However, it is difficult to satisfy the needs of fire monitoring and localization in time and space when using RS data from a single satellite to perform fire monitoring. Multi-source RS data are used for forest resource inventory and assessment because environmental factors may limit single monitoring results, decreasing monitoring effectiveness [41]. For example, Tian [41] extracted the time series of spreading fire lines to acquire the location and time evolution of a fire by combining fire data from Sichuan Province, China, with multi-source RS satellites, namely Planet, Sentinel-2, MODIS, GF-1, GF-4, and Landsat-8. This approach can accurately calculate and analyze the area and how it changed at different times after the fire, accurately and quickly judging the direction of fire spread and solving the problem that single RS data cannot be continuously monitored. Due to the cloud passage and uncertainty of image capture, fire recognition accuracy of satellite measurement system is low; sometimes, fire recognition sensitivity lags. To solve this issue, Krishnamoorthy [42] utilized IoT technology to identify fire by sensing and measuring environmental parameters through multiple sensors. This method avoids false calls and faulty alarms caused by a single sensor.
For the early detection of forest fires, forest managers would systematically locate fire lookout towers and monitor fire-hazardous areas from these towers. Furthermore, visible analysis has been successfully applied in GIS technology over the past few decades. Each lookout tower’s location can be ascertained based on GIS visibility and suitability analysis, and whether the towers can adequately cover a forest can be assessed. If not, they will overlap with the vegetation cover to create a new map to them locate additional lookout towers to increase the area of visible forest. Table 8 presents the statistical data that needed to be entered into the GIS system during the expansion of a Turkish forest lookout tower by Akay et al. Figure 8 displays the study’s findings [43,44,45]. This approach is unique because it looked at both the suitability of lookout tower locations and the visibility capacity of the new towers. Forest managers can combat forest fires using the study’s data [45].

4.1.3. Recovery of the Post-Disaster Environment

Forest fires can severely affect the coverage of surface vegetation. Therefore, it is necessary to gauge the amount of fire impacts by understanding post-disaster environmental recovery. The truth is that the recovery of a forest environment after a disaster varies from region to region, from years to decades. Therefore, assessing fires requires data in large spaces, which are difficult to collect from field surveys. Geoinformatics offers an alternative that provides the extent of burns from fires and monitors the degree of burns.
Image classification, the spectral vegetation index, and spectral mixture analysis are some of the most popular image analysis techniques that have been used to characterize vegetation recovery. The normalized vegetation index (NDVI) is the most popular technology. An area’s vegetation recovery can be assessed by comparing the changes in NDVI values in the years before and after the disaster in GIS. This method can be utilized for post-disaster renewable evaluation [46,47]. However, RS-based vegetation indices are limited in their monitoring capabilities and cannot distinguish between the regeneration dynamics of different vegetation types. So, they cannot explain the nature of fire damage well. To address this shortcoming, some researchers have spatially simulated forest dynamics (seed growth, competition, and succession) using the forest landscape model (FLM). This approach can compensate for processes not captured by fire succession models and RS to fill data gaps. It has been effectively applied to post-disaster forest reconstruction [48]. However, it is necessary to increase research in this field in the future.
In addition, forest fires can affect soil structure, porosity, and hydraulic conductivity. Radar remote sensing also plays a role in post-fire environmental restoration [49]. Cao et al. [50] used high-definition LiDAR terrain data and a GIS-based soil erosion model to obtain the landscape location, slope, and burn severity. The results showed the effects of wildfires on road runoff, soil erosion, and sediment transport to predict on-site soil loss ratio. Dobre [51] demonstrated that terrain slopes significantly affect the amount of mineral soil exposed after a wildfire. His findings allowed forest managers to identify areas of high and sensitive post-fire erosion by relying on topographic maps of forested areas using only GIS. In the future, researchers can continue to improve prediction accuracy and focus on determining the method’s applicability to larger-scale fires.
As shown in Figure 9, the application of geoinformatics in forest fire prevention has been studied from different perspectives. It includes the simulation of fire spread, monitoring, and risk zone delineation before forest fires. It can also be used in the positioning of fires, alarm system design, and watchtower optimization when forest fires occur and in the restoration of the forest environment after the fire occurs, etc. However, the following improvements should be made to make its application even better: First, the objectives and dimensions of RS research should be expanded. Presently, research on forestry RS is mainly concentrated in a small area, which does not fully exhibit the qualities of sensing data, including comprehensive coverage, quick speed, and real time. In the future, multi-dimensional essential information should be created to investigate the law of forestry development in depth [52]. Secondly, the capacity of the geographic information platform construction should be upgraded. Although some geographic information platforms have existed in recent years, such as forest resource surveys, wetland monitoring, and forest disaster monitoring, their large-scale production and application has been limited, due to the problems of network structure and resource dispersion. Thus, the integration of an already existing professional system should be performed to improve the platform’s level of intelligence and networking. Thirdly, it can support medium-long-term planning of digital forestry. Integrating GIS, RS, and other geographic information technology with forest management is imperative for forest managers, providing the required data more quickly and efficiently to realize the monitoring of forest resources and the estimation of forest ecology.

4.2. Application in Forest Road Construction

4.2.1. Using LiDAR for Forest Road Engineering

The road conditions should be observed when constructing forest roads. Currently, it is costly to collect information on forest characteristics through field surveys. LiDAR in RS is a cost-effective means of obtaining data with high spatial resolution and high-precision positioning. This method provides information on forest structure and biomass composition with up to 90% accuracy [53]. Therefore, GIS and LiDAR combine technologies used in most forest engineering construction.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) equipped with LiDAR were employed to acquire accurate maps of surface watercourses in forests [54]. LiDAR continued to track watercourse changes after construction to support later road improvements. Even though the methodology’s accuracy still needs to be verified, its results are encouraging and promising. The high accuracy requirements of forest roads require the development of automated and reliable programs to identify forest roads. According to recent research, Buján et al. [55] employed LiDAR to detect forest roads in conjunction with a new hierarchical hybrid classification tool (HyClass). It can update existing maps as long as the density of points is greater than 1 point/m2, which prevents errors caused by steep terrain or tree cover. This method maximizes the problem of road identification discontinuities and class similarities, but fewer areas are currently applying it. Therefore, more areas must be tested to verify its accuracy.
LiDAR, digital maps, and heuristic algorithms are widely used when optimizing forest roads. For example, an optimization program created based on GIS and ALS is feasible to confirm the viability of roads and locate inaccessible places before actual construction to assess alternate roads [56]. Kweon et al. [57] used mobile laser scanning (MLS) to map 3D forest roads to overcome the limitations of ALS and TLS. The MLS’s accuracy and mapping efficiency was evaluated by comparing the data obtained from GNSS and total station techniques. In conclusion, passive sensors widely used in cities are inefficiently used in forests with dense vegetation. On the contrary, LiDAR, which can provide data for areas below the canopy, is considered the best choice for detecting forest roads [55].

4.2.2. Use of Decision Assessment Tools for Forest Road Projects

Building forest road networks enables the sustainable management of forest resources, but the irreversible impacts on the forest environment should be eliminated. Therefore, forest managers must design forest road networks more efficiently and environmentally. Nowadays, GIS has become one of the most widely used tools in spatial planning and management, and it is frequently used in conjunction with decision support systems to plan forest road networks [58].
The utilized multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) for forest road planning has been widely used. The map layers such as slope, aspect, hydrology, landslide susceptibility, etc., have been created and the AHP used to determine the weights. As illustrated in Figure 10, the weighted graph was stacked in GIS to create maps of forest potential for road construction (FPRC) [59]. In this process, the different scenarios of the road network could be obtained by evaluating its technical, environmental, and social aspects. Then, the best-designed road network was compared, as shown in Figure 11 [60].
AHP is one of the most widely used methods in MCDM. It is designed to offer a consistent and quantifiable method. By calculating incompatible coefficients using ideas from various experts and combining quantitative and qualitative criteria, AHP can assist decision-makers in prioritizing goals and developing a set of criteria [61,62,63]. The technique was first incorporated into GIS applications by Rao et al. in 1991. Application of AHP has become easier in GIS environments and better to help calculate and analyze data, providing the possibility of combining different types of information [58]. For instance, Abdi et al. [64] presented a method for quantitatively selecting forest road networks, utilizing AHP to analyze the weights of the elements associated with the cost of building forest roads and create a final suitability map. Tampekis et al. [65] used GIS to create thematic maps and charts to evaluate the effects of road network construction on the environment. Hayati et al. [66] presented an integrated approach that combines SMCE (an MCDM method using spatial data) with Delphi and AHP in a GIS environment. The three-stage methodology allows experts to make judgments about road network planning and ultimately choose the most appropriate option. With the deepening of research, AHP is sometimes subjective in its application. So, some researchers, such as Bugday et al. and Nefeslioglu et al., have adopted the M-AHP method, which does not require expert opinion or other typical methods of MCDM, such as fuzzy inference system (FIS) and logistic regression (LR) for its calculation [67,68]. Some research has also incorporated SWOT analysis to obtain a more rational result after comparing the advantages, disadvantages, opportunities, and threats of building a forest road by weighing the SWOT items [69].
In summary, GIS is an effective tool for managing, analyzing, and gathering data while planning forest roads. To fully utilize its benefits, it is necessary to integrate it with other technologies or decision processes. This technique is now the foundation of forest planning. However, the model’s outcomes depend on the data’s correctness. Future researchers could include environmental aspects into the model, allowing managers to combine construction costs and environmental factors in route assessment and selection.

4.2.3. Using Heuristic Algorithms for Forest Road Engineering

Harvesting is one of the most important forest operations, including locating harvesting machinery, selecting roads for harvesting operations, and dividing up harvesting techniques logically according to different stands. This module accounts for about 55% of the total cost of production [70]. Thus, one of the main challenges for forest managers is to find a solution that guarantees operational efficiency while minimizing costs. To do this, a network design as a mixed-integer programming (MIP) problem should be described. MIP problems are appealing due to their optimal results, but they have the drawback of having a limited problem-solving space. In 1980, when using the branch and bound to solve MIP problems, researchers found it applied only to small-scale issues. Later, as research developed, Jone et al. (1986) and Kirby et al. (1986) proposed the integrated resource planning model (IRPM), which was tested and shown to be limited to solving medium-sized planning problems as well [71]. Despite further advancements, its ability to solve practical problems remains disappointing. As a result, heuristic techniques have been used, such as genetic algorithms, Tabu search, simulating annealing arithmetic, and others, to address these issues.
Numerous techniques for creating forest road networks utilizing heuristic algorithms and GIS have been presented. Bont et al. [72] developed an MIPL model to identify the best road network while lowering the costs of road construction and road transportation. They introduced a digital elevation model on GIS, which enabled road construction engineers to locate spatially optimal roads. Najaf et al. [71] proposed an optimized MIP model to design a forest road network with logging roads and skidding roads. The GIS was used to systematically discretize the landscape to design a finite number of construction decisions or potential road segments. This study addressed constraints earlier field research has encountered by employing improved formulations and general solvers. GIS-based methods can also identify forest roads with high traffic loads to upgrade roads and support road planning [73,74,75].
In summary, the effective utilization of GIS in conjunction with LiDAR, a decision-making system, and heuristic algorithms can generate precise data on forests, assess the best option for building a forest road, and maximize the benefits with limited funding. Figure 12 illustrates the proportion of the literature on GIS-based methods in forest road construction. With a total literature share of almost 85%, LiDAR, MCDM, and heuristic algorithms are more frequently utilized in this direction. These methods are more precise, practical, and comprehensive. It is also a potential development and more beneficial than conventional approaches.

5. Application of Geoinformatics in Forest Management

5.1. Application in the Transport of Forest Materials

Forest transportation is an important part of the forest product production process, which connects the production in the logging stage and the operation in the storage stage [76]. In recent years, researchers have widely used modern computer technology and GIS in forest transportation, which is more efficient and high-precision in obtaining forest material information.
Researchers planned the transportation routes of trucks from the harvesting site to the wood processing plant with GIS spatial data. They combined the shortest path model and several constraints to achieve the selection and optimization of transportation roads. The final results are displayed on GIS maps, as shown in Figure 13 [77,78]. A straight-line road segment may not be the fastest due to traffic and vehicle speed constraints [79], so Dowdle et al. [80] created a model to effectively predict the changes in forest transportation patterns. This model can monitor and update road conditions in real time and monitor the various arrangements for forest product transportation. In this way, it can respond to emergencies in a timely manner. It can also reduce waste to ensure the best transportation of forest products.
Generally, several variables can affect the accuracy of transportation cost assessments, such as driving speed and transport distance. A GIS-based model involves geographic datasets and contains various attribute information of the forest. Datasets are the fundamental difference between GIS-based models and non-GIS-based models, such as biogeographical distribution, road networks, and environmental information, which can be layered and integrated. Multi-layered datasets allow for the spatial manipulation of this integrated information, such as extracting regional available information [81]. The benefit of the GIS is that it integrates site-specific datasets to produce a more accurate assessment. It is extensively applied for supply chain cost analysis or least cost site selection [82]. Sosa et al. and Keramati et al. [83,84] selected the lowest cost route by estimating biomass allocation and then serving timber mills. Contreras et al. [85] planned the forest roads from the stump to each candidate landing and selected the best landing location to minimize forest road costs with GIS data. Mohtashami et al. [86] used GIS with terrestrial laser scanning datasets to avoid soil damage and pave better roads. This method increased the profitability of timber transportation in Sweden.
Furthermore, with the development of timber transportation plans, a substantial amount of non-spatial and spatial data, data processing tools, and decision models have been utilized to address challenging issues in the forest [87]. Some researchers planned the transportation method of forest products according to ground slope, soil type, and equipment with the AHP method [88]. Some researchers integrated linear programming with GIS and used general algorithm languages such as C++ or Visual Basic to provide better program processing speed and flexibility. The results were able to realize various functions, including obtaining the vehicle’s positional information, tracing the timber source, and finding the least cost path [87,89,90]. Figure 14 illustrates the thematic methodology for material transport.
In conclusion, using GIS for forest transportation planning is more effective. It can improve the efficiency of traditional transportation, save the time and cost of surveying the logging area, and reduce the danger of surveying. There is much more potential for the development of GIS-based decision models. For instance, researchers can create transportation time sub-models to compute the time required for each section of the road, thus using road classification data as an independent parameter.

5.2. Application in Harvesting Operations

Normally, traditional forest harvesting focuses on economic benefits, but ignores environmental protection. Therefore, integrating harvesting methods with ecological benefits has become an essential consideration in harvesting planning [91,92]. Since harvesting decisions are primarily spatial, GIS is an indispensable tool which can provide spatial and non-spatial data. Currently, GIS has solved problems like the harvesting order, harvesting size, and division of timber flow [93].
Qiu et al. [91] applied GIS MapInfo, DBMS, and mathematical planning methods to create a harvesting decision support system with MapBasic language, which improved the accuracy of decision-making. In the forest management inventory, the survey content is only up to the subcompartment, not including individual trees. So, to make the survey data more detailed, Dang et al. [92] developed an Internet client to build an enterprise-oriented GIS system combined with the SuperMap 6R platform and J2EE and RIA technology. The information and spatial structure of all individual trees in the subcompartment were reconstructed and visualized. Most researchers start from the secondary development of the decision-making system, combining GIS and digital analysis to create an auxiliary decision support system for forest harvesting information collection, storage, querying, updating, etc. [93,94].
Researchers from various countries have used different approaches for different situations. For instance, Kühmaier et al. [95] created an SDSS model for harvesting decisions in the steep terrain of southern Austria. These models use GIS to analyze forest data, fully combining ecological, economic, and social impacts. However, researchers should note that this solution may be the best compromise based on subjective judgments. To minimize errors, Phelps et al. [96] introduced a harvest operability index (HOI) for the Jocassee Gorges Natural Resource Area, in Northwestern South Carolina, USA. They developed a GIS model applicable to mechanized harvesting with wheeled equipment in hill-shaped terrain and obtained data layers for the HOI including GIS data from a Jocassee staff and publicly available US Census, hydrology, elevation, and soil data, as shown in Table 9 and Table 10. This method can analyze the operability of timber harvesting and determine the harvesting operations effectively, and it can reduce costs to facilitate the rational allocation of time, equipment, and people, as shown in Figure 15. However, HOI did not consider the distance from the harvesting area to the mill. Future research objects should include cost analysis and precise trucks’ maneuverability. Researchers can also use the model combined with other decision-making systems to improve the quality of timber harvesting, such as prioritizing the most feasible locations for ecological restoration or fuel dilution. Some researchers continue to use AHP and LiDAR to collect spatial data and observe timber harvesting [97,98].
Furthermore, Jaziri [99] examined the subject from a different perspective. He contended that most spatial planning problems discovered by computer techniques and heuristics only deal with simplified rather than real-world issues. Therefore, he proposed a multi-criteria optimization approach based on optimization techniques and GIS. This method uses the potential of GIS for spatial data processing to choose the less costly harvesting direction based on each tree’s neighborhood and the current road network. He reduced the damage by optimizing the direction of harvesting. Figure 16 and Figure 17 illustrate this strategy. However, the method also has some limitations. In the current study, researchers only considered four main potential directions of harvesting, which can be refined to be more precise (e.g., eight directions) in the future. Secondly, besides financial objectives, researchers should include ecological parameters in management to maintain biodiversity, forest profitability, etc.

5.3. Application in Forest Resource Management

The spatial distribution of forest resources can exhibit clustered, uniform, or random patterns depending on the species’ traits and locality. Forest managers can plan forest activities and reduce environmental disturbance efficiently though understanding the spatial distribution of forest resources. Geoinformatics-based research on forest resources enables management both spatially and temporally. It also can allow forest resource planning and operational regulations to achieve sustainable utilization. For example, Berendt [100] used species suitability maps and soil sensitivity data to identify the forest development types and harvesting areas based on GIS. Miron [101] assessed the spatial distribution pattern of six species and analyzed the relationship between terrain and population density.
Species surveys play a crucial role in macro-monitoring forest ecosystems and biodiversity [102]. With the support of RS, researchers can not only obtain information on the quantity, spatial distribution, and dynamic changes in forest resources but also realize the quantitative retrieval of forest canopy closure and biological resources by combining various models. Therefore, RS as a practical monitoring tool has been widely used in forest resource inventory, forest planning, and management [103]. Especially in recent years, low-altitude UAV technology has been developing rapidly. It can obtain high-spatial resolution and high-spectral resolution images of vegetation by carrying different sensors and providing the possibility of forest-type identification. The parameters of the standard sensors held by UAVs are summarized in Table 11. Researchers can use multi-source RS data to recognize wood species individually or complement each other. For example, Shi et al. [104] combined multispectral and LiDAR for temperate tree species classification, and the accuracy of their result was significantly improved. Mao et al. [105] used QuickBird multispectral images and SAR data for forest-type classification and found that the advantages of multi-scale combination are obvious. Based on RGB images and hyperspectral images taken by UAVs at 83–94 m flight altitude, Nevalainen et al. [106] analyzed the performance which combining multi-source data in detecting single trees and classifying tree species in boreal forests. Both results reached more than 90% accuracy.
After gaining a thorough understanding of forest resource distribution, several researchers began to research their distribution of resources [107]. For instance, Voivontas et al. [108] created an environmental decision support system to estimate the power generation potential of agricultural residues by GIS. Freppaz et al. [109] proposed a decision support system for forest biomass energy development. In their study, GIS was combined with mathematical programming methods to assess the possibility of producing thermal and electric energy. Frombo et al. [110] innovatively considered the different energy conversion technologies (pyrolysis, gasification, or combustion) in optimization equations and made decisions by visualizing a forest through a GIS-based graphical interface. Establishing a decision support system can help managers obtain forest information and make management decisions.
In addition, to effectively determine the impact of forest operations on the environment, researchers have used forest data such as terrain and soil as predictive variables. They developed a prediction model for soil disturbance by implementing generalized regressive analysis and spatial prediction. Then, they depicted land types susceptible to disturbance during operation by GIS and thus predicted the effects of forest operations on soil properties [111,112]. Overall, although the amount of the research literature in this area is minor, environment-oriented forest resource allocation is becoming the focus of governments’ concern in the context of sustainable development. With the current fusion of RS data sources in the process of data structure mismatch and other problems, the mining of information on specific bands is less. So, the research prospects in this direction are broader. The popular techniques for forest management are compiled in Figure 18.

6. Conclusions and Outlook

In the last 20 years, the software of GIS combined with decision support tools and the LiDAR system are the main geoinformatics technologies applied in forest planning and management. In addition to being widely and effectively applied in forest fire prevention and forest road construction, GIS has also been successfully applied in forest management activities such as material transportation and timber harvesting. The application of GIS in supporting the planning, design, and management of forests will have great potential in the future.
In the field of forest fire prevention, the vast data processing and storage capabilities of GIS have been used to show forest fire spread trends, identify risk areas, create different forest fire warning systems, pinpoint the location of watchtowers, and understand forest ecosystem recovery after disasters. GIS has also been combined with LiDAR technology, decision evaluation tools, and heuristic algorithms, which has been applied to the mapping selection and information detection of forest road construction and forest material transportation. Therefore, the ability of system models to solve general problems should be improved. Currently, GIS technology can be used in conjunction with laser scanners and other photogrammetric techniques to perform 2.5D or 3D spatial analysis. However, it still cannot break through the restrictions of natural, economic, social, and other factors around the world. Therefore, accelerating the research and application of 4D forest simulation and virtual reality (VR) systems in the future is the key to solving this problem.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.X. and S.S.; methodology, J.X.; writing—original draft preparation, J.X., S.S., Q.H., Z.C. and Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, J.X., S.S. and Q.H.; supervision, project administration, Z.C., Z.Z. and J.X.; visualization, J.X. and S.S.; funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program’s Strategic International Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Key Project (No. 2018YFE0207800).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Acknowledgments

We thank all reviewers who provided valuable comments for this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Laschi, A.; Foderi, C.; Fabiano, F.; Neri, F.; Cambi, M.; Mariotti, B.; Marchi, E. Forest Road Planning, Construction and Maintenance to Improve Forest Fire Fighting: A Review. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2019, 40, 207–219. [Google Scholar]
  2. Simonenkova, A.; Simonenkov, M.; Bacherikov, I. Optimization of forest road network layout problem. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 817, 012032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Caliskan, E. Forest road extraction from orthophoto images by convolutional neural networks. Geocarto Int. 2022, 37, 11671–11685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Luo, L.; O’Hehir, J.; Regan, C.M.; Li, M.; Regan, C.M.; Chow, C.W.K. An integrated strategic and tactical optimization model for forest supply chain planning. For. Policy Econ. 2021, 131, 102571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhou, Y. Present State and Prospect of China’s Forest City Cluster Development in the New Era. World For. Res. 2020, 33, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  6. Michael, H.; Enno, U.; Ralf, M.; Jochen, D.; Kilian, S.; Hans, P. Utilising forest inventory data for biodiversity assessment. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cammerino, A.R.B.; Ingaramo, M.; Piacquadio, L.; Monteleone, M. Assessing and Mapping Forest Functions through a GIS-Based, Multi-Criteria Approach as a Participative Planning Tool: An Application Analysis. Forests 2023, 14, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Woo, H.; Acuna, M.; Moroni, M.; Taskhiri, M.S.; Turner, P. Optimizing the Location of Biomass Energy Facilities by Integrating Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Forests 2018, 9, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Caliskan, E. Planning of Environmentally Sound Forest Road Route Using GIS & S-MCDM. Šumar. List 2017, 141, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sanchez-Garcia, S.; Athanassiadis, D.; Martínez-Alonso, C.; Tolosana, E.; Majada, J.; Canga, E. A GIS methodology for optimal location of a wood-fired power plant: Quantification of available woodfuel, supply chain costs and GHG emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 157, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mishra, A.K.; Deep, S.; Choudhary, A. Identification of suitable sites for organic farming using AHP & GIS. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2015, 18, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kulimushi, L.C.; Choudhari, P.; Mubalama, L.K.; Banswed, G.T. GIS and remote sensing-based assessment of soil erosion risk using RUSLE model in South-Kivu province, eastern, Democratic Republic of Congo. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2021, 12, 961–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, S.Z.; He, Y.J.; Chen, J.W.; Qin, X.H. Study on Road Construction and Investment and Financing Management in Forestry Areas, 1st ed.; Yu, J.F., Ed.; China Forestry Press: Beijing, China, 2015; Volume 6, ISBN 978-7-50-387800-8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Howell, C.I.; Wilson, A.D.; Davey, S.M. Sustainable forest management reporting in Australia. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qin, X.H.; Zhao, X.D. Development of Forest Roads in Australia and Implications. World For. Res. 2021, 34, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, S.Z.; Zhao, R. A study on road development model of forest areas in the United States. For. Resour. Manag. 2014, 1, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bai, X.P.; Chen, S.Z.; He, Y.J. Current status and inspiration of road development in foreign forest areas. World For. Res. 2015, 28, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Du, B.X. Emergency road planning for forest fire prevention in the northern mountains of Pulandian. For. Surv. Des. 2021, 50, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, F.L.; Cao, J.; Bai, Y. Research on three-dimensional analogue simulation of forest fire spread based on metacellular automata. Comput. Eng. Appl. 2016, 52, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhou, G.X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, A.B. Research on metacellular automata algorithm for forest fire spread simulation. J. Instrum. 2017, 38, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.W.; Yang, Y.C.; Wang, T. Three-dimensional visual simulation of highland forest fire spread based on metacellular automata. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2021, 21, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, Y.Y.; Weng, W.G.; Yuan, H.Y. GIS-based simulation of forest fire spread. J. Tsinghua Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2012, 52, 1726–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, B.B.; Wang, W.Y.; Chen, L.F. Forest fire spread simulation based on VIIRS fire point data and FARSITE system. J. Remote Sens. 2022, 26, 1575–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, C.B.; Zhou, J.; Tang, B.G. Analysis of forest fire spread trend surrounding transmission line based on Rothermel model and Huygens principle. Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquitous Eng. 2014, 9, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hui, S.; Rui, X.P.; Liu, H.Y. GIS based method for the simulation and location decision making of forest fire suppression. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2016, 16, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, Y.Q.; Luo, C.W. Computer simulation of forest fire spread based on GIS model. For. Eng. 2013, 29, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ju, W.Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, L.S. Urban forest fire risk assessment based on AHP and historical disaster data. Ind. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 48, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang, B.H.; Sun, Z.J.; Zhou, L.X. Forest fire risk prediction based on comprehensive fire risk index. Fire Sci. Technol. 2011, 30, 1181–1185. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yang, J.H.; Shao, H.M.; Lan, Y.X. Grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of forest fire risk. Sci. Manag. 2014, 4, 37–38. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y. Statistical analysis of forest fire risk in China. Stat. Inf. Forum 2014, 29, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shao, B.W.; Qin, T. Research on forest fire risk zoning based on quadratic entropy weight method. Times Financ. 2016, 9, 280–285. [Google Scholar]
  32. Parajulia, A.; Gautamb, A.P.; Sharma, S.P.; Bhujelb, K.B.; Sharmad, G.; Thapab, P.B.; Biste, B.S.; Poudelf, S. Forest fire risk mapping using GIS and remote sensing in two major landscapes of Nepal. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2020, 11, 2569–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, P.C.; Zhang, F.Q.; Lin, H.F.; Xu, S.W. GIS-Based Forest Fire Risk Model: A Case Study in Laoshan National Forest Park, Nanjing. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yin, J.Y.; Jia, X.L.; Guo, Y.J. Forest fire risk assessment and zoning in Sanya City. Fire Sci. Technol. 2021, 40, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zong, X.Z.; Tian, X.R.; Ma, S. Quantitative assessment of forest fire risk based on fire simulation—Taking the Experimental Centre of Subtropical Forestry of China Academy of Forestry Sciences as an example. J. Beijing For. Univ. 2022, 44, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pradeep, G.S.; Homian, D.J.; Nikhil, S. Forest Fire Risk Zone Mapping of Eravikulam National Park in India: A Comparison Between Frequency Ratio and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2022, 43, 199–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fu, X.C. GIS-based map production of potential risk of forest fire in Xupu County. South. China Agric. 2023, 17, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barbosa, M.R.; Seoanea, J.C.S.; Buratto, M.G.; Diasc, L.S.; Raivelb, J.P.C.; Martinsb, F.L. Forest Fire Alert System: A Geo Web GIS prioritization model considering land susceptibility and hotspots-a case study in the Carajas National Forest, Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 24, 873–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Salsabila, H.N.; Sahitya, A.F.; Mahyatar, P. Spatio-temporal pattern analysis of forest fire event in South Kalimantan using integration remote sensing data and GIS for forest fire disaster mitigation. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 504, 012011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jeefoo, P. Wildfire Field Survey using Mobile GIS Technology in Nan Province. In Proceedings of the 2019 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT-NCON), Nan, Thailand, 30 January–2 February 2019; pp. 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tian, Y.P.; Wu, Z.C.; Wang, B.; Zhang, X.D. Forest Fire Spread Monitoring and Vegetation Dynamics Detection Based on Multi-Source Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krishnamoorthy, M.; Asif, M.; Kumar, P.P.; Nuvvula, R.S.; Khan, B.; Colak, I. A Design and Development of the Smart Forest Alert Monitoring System Using IoT. J. Sens. 2023, 2023, 8063524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Akay, A.E.; Wing, M.; Buyuksakalli, H.; Malkocoglu, S. Evaluation of Fire Lookout Towers Using GIS-Evpdfbased Spatial Visibility and Suitability Analyzes. Šumar. List 2020, 144, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Akbulak, C.; Özdemir, M. The Application of the Visibility Analysis for Fire Observation Towers in the Gelibolu Peninsula (NW Turkey) Using GIS. In Proceedings of the Conference on Water Observation and Information System for Decision Support, Ohrid, Macedonia, 27–31 May 2008; pp. 249–259. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kucuk, O.; Topaloglu, O.; Altunel, A.O.; Cetin, M. Visibility analysis of fire lookout towers in the Boyabat State Forest Enterprise in Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Petropoulos, G.P.; Griffiths, H.M.; Kalivas, D. Spatial and Temporal Ecosystem Recovery Dynamics following a wildfire event in a Mediterranean landscape using EO data and GIS Techniques. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 50, 120–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Evans, A.; Lamine, S.; Kalivas, D.P.; Petropoulos, G.P. Exploring the potential of EO data and GIS for ecosystem health modeling in response to wildfire: A case study in central Greece. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2018, 17, 2165–2178. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu, W.R.; He, H.S.; Fraser, J.S.; Hawbaker, T.J.; Henne, P.D.; Duan, S.W.; Zhu, Z.L. Spatially explicit reconstruction of post-megafire forest recovery through landscape modeling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2020, 134, 104884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, W.W.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.H.; Cao, H.M.; Wang, J.B.; Zuo, J.H.; Wang, J.Q. Research progress of forest fire remote sensing detection technology. J. Northwest For. Coll. 2023, 38, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cao, L.X.; Scholar, V.; Elliot, W.; Long, J.W. Spatial simulation of forest road effects on hydrology and soil erosion after a wildfire. Hydrol. Process. 2021, 35, e14139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dobre, M.; Wu, J.Q.; Elliot, W.J. Effects of Topographic Features on Postfire Exposed Mineral Soil in Small Watersheds. For. Sci. 2014, 60, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, N.; Li, Z.Y.; Liao, S.X.; Pang, Y.; Xu, B. Current situation and prospect of research on application of Remote Sensing to forestry. World For. Res. 2017, 30, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Grigolato, S.; Mologni, O.; Cavalli, R. GIS Applications in forest operations and road network planning: An overview over the last two decades. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2017, 38, 175–186. [Google Scholar]
  54. Yoshida, M.; Sakurai, R.; Sakai, H. Forest road planning using precision geographic data under climate change. Int. J. For. Eng. 2019, 30, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Buján, S.; Hernández, J.G.; Ferreiro, E.G. Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data and Hybrid Classification. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sterenczak, K.; Moskalik, T. Use of LiDAR-based digital terrain model and single tree segmentation data for optimal forest skid trail network. iForest Biogeosci. For. 2015, 8, 661–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kweon, H.; Seo, J.; Lee, J.W. Assessing the Applicability of Mobile Laser Scanning for Mapping Forest Roads in the Republic of Korea. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hayati, E.; Majnounian, B.; Abdi, E.; Sessions, J.; Makhdoum, M. An expert-based approach to forest road network planning by combining Delphi and spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 1767–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Babapour, R.; Naghdi, R.; Salehi, A.; Ghajar, I. A Decision Support System for Allocation of Mountain Forest Roads Based on Ground Stability. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2014, 39, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Talebi, M.; Majnounian, B.; Makhdoum, M.; Abdi, E.; Omid, M.; Marchi, E.; Laschi, A. A GIS-MCDM-based road network planning for tourism development and management in Arasbaran forest, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Çalışkan, E. Planning of Forest Road Network and Analysis in Mountainous Area. Life Sci. J. 2013, 10, 2456–2465. [Google Scholar]
  62. Norizah, K.; Hasmadi, M. Developing Priorities and Ranking for Suitable Forest Road Allocation Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malays. 2012, 41, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pellegrini, M.; Grigolato, S.; Cavalli, R. Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Process to Define Maintenance Priorities of Forest Road Network: An Application in the Italian Alpine Region. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2013, 34, 31–42. [Google Scholar]
  64. Abdi, E.; Majnounian, B.; Darvishsefat, A.; Mashayekhi, Z.; Sessions, J. A GIS-MCE based model for forest road planning. J. For. Sci. 2009, 55, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tampekis, S.; Sakellariou, S.; Samara, F.; Sfougaris, A.; Jaeger, D.; Christopoulou, O. Mapping the optimal forest road network based on the multicriteria evaluation technique: The case study of Mediterranean Island of Thassos in Greece. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 54, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hayati, E.; Majnounian, B.; Abdi, E. Qualitative evaluation and optimization of forest road network to minimize total costs and environmental impacts. iForest Biogeosci. For. 2012, 5, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bugday, E.; Akay, A.E. Evaluation of forest road network planning in landslide sensitive areas by GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approaches in Ihsangazi watershed, Northern Turkey. Šumar. List 2019, 143, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nefeslioglu, H.A.; San, T.; Gokceoglu, C.; Duman, T.Y. An assessment on the use of Terra ASTER L3A data in landslide susceptibility mapping. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2012, 14, 40–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Daoutis, C.; Kantartzis, A.; Tampekis, S.; Stergiadou, A.; Arabatzis, G. The Application of SWOT-AHP Analysis in the Design and Construction of Forest Road Network. In Proceedings of the HAICTA 2022, Athens, Greece, 22–25 September 2022; pp. 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  70. Epstein, R.; Weintrau, A.; Sapunar, P.; Niet, E.; Julian, B.; Session, S.J.; Bustamante, F.; Musante, H. A Combinatorial Heuristic Approach for Solving Real-Size Machinery Location and Road Design Problems in Forestry Planning. Oper. Res. 2006, 54, 1017–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Najafi, A.; Evelyn, E.W. Richards. Designing a Forest Road Network Using Mixed Integer Programming. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2013, 34, 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  72. Bont, L.G.; Heinimann, H.R.; Church, R.L. Concurrent optimization of harvesting and road network layouts under steep terrain. Ann. Oper. Res. 2012, 232, 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Grigolato, S.; Pellegrini, M.; Cavalli, R. Temporal analysis of the traffic loads on forest road networks. iForest Biogeosci. For. 2013, 6, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Karlsson, J.; Ronnqvist, M.; Frisk, M. RoadOpt: A decision support system for road upgrading in forestry. Scand. J. For. Res. 2006, 21, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Talebi, M.; Majnounian, B.; Abdi, E.; Tehrani, F.B. Developing a GIS database for forest road management in Arasbaran forest, Iran. For. Sci. Technol. 2015, 11, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, S.F.; Xung, Y.Q.; Wu, H.B. Research on optimisation of timber transport routes based on GIS and RS technology—An example of Wangqing forest area in Jilin Province. For. Eng. 2011, 27, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Silva, F.; Minette, L.J.; Souza, A.P. Classification of Forest Roads and Determination of Route Using Geographic Information System. Rev. Árvore 2016, 40, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Devlin, G.L.; McDonnell, K.; Ward, S. Timber haulage routing in Ireland: An analysis using GIS and GPS. J. Transp. Geogr. 2008, 16, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Parsakhoo, A.; Mostafa, M. Road network analysis for timber transportation from a harvesting site to mills (Case study: Gorgan county-Iran). J. For. Sci. 2015, 61, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dowdle, L.R.; Douglas, R.A. Log truck transportation an public roads in New Zealand—Regional network analysis with geographic information systems. Transp. Res. Rec. 2007, 1989, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Khachatryan, H.; Jessup, E.; Casavant, K. A GIS-based Estimation of Regional Biomass Supply and Transportation Costs for Biofuel Plant Least-Cost Location Decisions. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, VA, USA, 11–13 March 2010; pp. 4–21. [Google Scholar]
  82. Tahvanainen, T.; Anttila, P. Supply chain cost analysis of long-distance transportation of energy wood in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 3360–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sosa, A.; McDonnell, K.; Devlin, G. Analysing Performance Characteristics of Biomass Haulage in Ireland for Bioenergy Markets with GPS, GIS and Fuel Diagnostic Tools. Energies 2015, 8, 12004–12019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Keramati, A.; Lu, P.; Sobhani, A.; Esmaeil, S.A. Impact of Forest Road Maintenance Policies on Log Transportation Cost, Routing, and Carbon-Emission Trade-Offs: Oregon Case Study. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2020, 146, 04020028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Contreras, M.; Chung, W. A computer approach to finding an optimal log landing location and analyzing influencing factors for ground-based timber harvesting. Can. J. For. Res. 2007, 37, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mohtashami, S.; Bergkvist, I.; Löfgren, B.; Berget, S. A GIS Approach to Analyzing Off-Road Transportation: A Case Study in Sweden. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2012, 33, 275–284. [Google Scholar]
  87. Qiu, R.Z. A decision support system for timber transport planning based on GIS. For. Sci. 2002, 38, 116–121. [Google Scholar]
  88. Akay, A.E.; Yilmaz, B. Using GIS and AHP for Planning Primer Transportation of Forest Products. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2017, 4, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gerasimov, Y.; Sokolov, A.; Karjalainen, T. GIS-Based Decision-Support Program for Planning and Analyzing Short-Wood Transport in Russia. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2008, 29, 163–175. [Google Scholar]
  90. Chen, Q.Y.; Lin, Y.H.; Qiu, R.Z. Design of a forestry transport audit system based on Mobile Web GIS. J. For. Eng. 2016, 1, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Qiu, R.Z.; Zhou, X.N. A GIS-based decision support system for preferred operational logging areas. Appl. Technol. 2001, 3, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  92. Dang, Q.W.; Wang, Y.X.; Xu, F. Development of a single-plant harvesting system based on Web GIS and Class II survey data. J. Northeast For. Univ. 2012, 40, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xie, P.F.; Tian, R.L.; Huang, J.R. Forest ecological logging planning and design based on GIS technology. Henan Sci. 2016, 34, 1295–1330. [Google Scholar]
  94. Yang, X.C.; Liu, D.L.; Zheng, X.X. Research on auxiliary decision-making system for forest harvesting based on GIS. J. Northwest For. Coll. 2015, 30, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kühmaier, M.; Stampfer, K. Development of a Multi-Attribute Spatial Decision Support System in Selecting Timber Harvesting Systems. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2010, 31, 75–88. [Google Scholar]
  96. Phelps, K.; Hiesl, P.; Hagan, D.; Hagan, A.H. The Harvest Operability Index (HOI): A Decision Support Tool for Mechanized Timber Harvesting in Mountainous Terrain. Forests 2021, 12, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Latterini, F.; Stefanoni, W.; Venanzi, R.; Tocci, D.; Picchio, R. GIS-AHP Approach in Forest Logging Planning to Apply Sustainable Forest Operations. Forests 2022, 13, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Palander, T.; Kärhä, K. Utilization of Image, LiDAR and Gamma-Ray Information to Improve Environmental Sustainability of Cut-to-Length Wood Harvesting Operations in Peatlands: A Management Systems Perspective. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jaziri, W. Using GIS and multicriteria decision aid to optimize the direction of trees cutting in the forest ecosystem: A case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 143, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Berendt, F.; Fortin, M.; Jaeger, D.; Schweier, J. How Climate Change Will Affect Forest Composition and Forest Operations in Baden-Württemberg—A GIS-Based Case Study Approach. Forests 2017, 8, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Miron, A.C.; Bezerra, T.G.; Emmert, F.; Nascimento, R.G.; Pereira, R.S.; Higuchi, N. Spatial distribution of six managed tree species is influenced by topography conditions in the Central Amazon. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 281, 111835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, H.Y.; Chen, Y.F.; Chen, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C. Research progress of forest tree species identification based on remote sensing technology. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2021, 36, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. He, X.Y.; Ren, C.Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, Z.M.; Zheng, H.F. Research progress of forest ecosystem remote sensing monitoring technology. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2018, 38, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shi, Y.; Wang, T.; Skidmore, A.K.; Heurich, M. Improving LiDAR-based tree species mapping in Central European mixed forests using multi-temporal digital aerial colour-infrared photographs. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 84, 101970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mao, X.G.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Y.T.; Yao, Y.; Fan, W.Y. Object-oriented classification for tree species based on high spatial resolution images and spaceborne polarimetric SAR cooperation with feature. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2019, 55, 92–102. [Google Scholar]
  106. Nevalainen, O.; Honkavaara, E.; Honkavaara, S.; Viljanen, N.; Hakala, T.; Yu, X.W.; Hyyppä, J.; Saar, H.; Pölönen, I.; Imai, N.N.; et al. Individual Tree Detection and Classification with UAV-Based Photogrammetric Point Clouds and Hyperspectral Imaging. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, H.; Dong, F.; Xie, F.J. Analysis of spatial pattern change and management decision of forest resources based on GIS. J. Jinan Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2010, 24, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  108. Voivontas, D.; Assimacopoulos, D.; Koukios, E.G. Assessment of biomass potential for power production: A GIS based method. Biomass Bioenergy 2001, 20, 101–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Freppaz, D.; Minciardi, R.; Robba, M. Optimizing forest biomass exploitation for energy supply at a regional level. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Frombo, F.; Minciardia, R.; Robba, M.; Rosso, F.; Sacile, R. Planning woody biomass logistics for energy production: A strategic decision model. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33, 372–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lee, J.A.; Oh, J.H.; Cha, D.S. Prediction of Forest Biomass Resources and Harvesting Cost Using GIS. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2013, 29, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Shabani, S.; Najafi, A.; Majnonian, B.; Alavi1, J.; Sattarian, A. Spatial prediction of soil disturbance caused by forest logging using generalized additive models and GIS. Eur. J. For. Res. 2019, 138, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 15 00439 g001
Figure 1. Number of papers published, 2004–2023.
Figure 1. Number of papers published, 2004–2023.
Forests 15 00439 g001
Forests 15 00439 g002
Figure 2. Word cloud of keywords that often appear in literature searches.
Figure 2. Word cloud of keywords that often appear in literature searches.
Forests 15 00439 g002
Forests 15 00439 g003
Figure 3. Main keyword count.
Figure 3. Main keyword count.
Forests 15 00439 g003
Forests 15 00439 g004
Figure 4. Proportion of subject categories of journals in the collection.
Figure 4. Proportion of subject categories of journals in the collection.
Forests 15 00439 g004
Forests 15 00439 g005
Figure 5. Chart of the number of research themes in papers by year.
Figure 5. Chart of the number of research themes in papers by year.
Forests 15 00439 g005
Forests 15 00439 g006
Figure 6. GIS-based 3D forest fire spread simulation process.
Figure 6. GIS-based 3D forest fire spread simulation process.
Forests 15 00439 g006
Forests 15 00439 g007
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the interaction between hotspots and sensitivity maps.
Figure 7. Schematic representation of the interaction between hotspots and sensitivity maps.
Forests 15 00439 g007
Forests 15 00439 g008
Figure 8. (a) Woodland visible through one or more watchtowers; (b) Visibility analysis results of the proposed observation towers (A) and superimposed map of proposed and existing towers visibility condition (B).
Figure 8. (a) Woodland visible through one or more watchtowers; (b) Visibility analysis results of the proposed observation towers (A) and superimposed map of proposed and existing towers visibility condition (B).
Forests 15 00439 g008
Forests 15 00439 g009
Figure 9. Forest fire theme research methodology.
Figure 9. Forest fire theme research methodology.
Forests 15 00439 g009
Forests 15 00439 g010
Figure 10. GIS layers used to determine forest potential for road construction.
Figure 10. GIS layers used to determine forest potential for road construction.
Forests 15 00439 g010
Forests 15 00439 g011
Figure 11. Road network scenarios designed for planning and management.
Figure 11. Road network scenarios designed for planning and management.
Forests 15 00439 g011
Forests 15 00439 g012
Figure 12. Methodology for forest road construction.
Figure 12. Methodology for forest road construction.
Forests 15 00439 g012
Forests 15 00439 g013
Figure 13. (a) Transport routes identified by the GIS network analysis function: shorter distance transport routes (A) and fastest routes (B); (b) GIS maps showing A (GPS), B (road class), and C (shortest route).
Figure 13. (a) Transport routes identified by the GIS network analysis function: shorter distance transport routes (A) and fastest routes (B); (b) GIS maps showing A (GPS), B (road class), and C (shortest route).
Forests 15 00439 g013
Forests 15 00439 g014
Figure 14. Thematic methodology for forest material transport.
Figure 14. Thematic methodology for forest material transport.
Forests 15 00439 g014
Forests 15 00439 g015
Figure 15. Operability of HOI model outputs as levels 1–5.
Figure 15. Operability of HOI model outputs as levels 1–5.
Forests 15 00439 g015
Forests 15 00439 g016
Figure 16. Selecting the optimal direction from four harvesting directions.
Figure 16. Selecting the optimal direction from four harvesting directions.
Forests 15 00439 g016
Forests 15 00439 g017
Figure 17. Manually selected harvesting direction (left) and harvesting direction proposed by the method (right). The direction of the arrows indicates the cutting direction.
Figure 17. Manually selected harvesting direction (left) and harvesting direction proposed by the method (right). The direction of the arrows indicates the cutting direction.
Forests 15 00439 g017
Forests 15 00439 g018
Figure 18. Forest management thematic research methodology.
Figure 18. Forest management thematic research methodology.
Forests 15 00439 g018
Table 1. Search regulations.
Table 1. Search regulations.
Search CriterionSearch Scope
DatabaseSCIEICNKI
LanguageEnglishEnglishEnglish, Chinese
Scientific fieldAll
Academic journalAll
Article typeJournal articles, Conference papers, Book chapters
Search for wordsTitle, Abstract, Keywords, Subject
Publication dateJanuary 2004–March 2023
Search term“GIS”, “Forest”, “Road planning”, “Operations”, “Forest fires”, “Transport of materials”, “Timber harvesting”, “Forest resources”, “Decision support”, “Management”
Table 2. Summary table of commonly used keywords for articles on various topics.
Table 2. Summary table of commonly used keywords for articles on various topics.
Topic of the ArticleKeyword
Forest fire preventionforest fire spread, forest fire, FARSITE, fire behavior, fire simulation, cellular automata model, Huygen’s principle, three-dimensional visualization, forest firefighting, burn probability, fire risk map, prediction, fire management, fire risk index models, forest fire risk, hotspots, wildfire, fire monitoring, visibility and suitability analyses, fire lookout tower, alert system
Disaster recoveryenvironmental preservation, vegetation regeneration, ecosystem health modeling, earth observation, resilience, soil erosion, burn severity, dispersal drainage system, surface runoff, natural resources, sensitivity analysis
Forest planningroad network efficiency, slope analysis, GIS, remote sensing, AHP, optimum road density, road upgrading, forest road planning, Delphi method, road design, road network improvement, road network analysis, decision support system, SWOT, spatial distribution, forest network extraction, green infrastructure, algorithm, LiDAR
Forestry activitiestimber harvesting, harvesting costs, harvest access planning, precision harvesting, logging residues, railway transportation, forest transportation, traffic loads
Forest managementsingle tree detection, digital terrain model, development pattern, investment and financing mechanism, management, species suitability map, biomass estimation, tree species identification, multi-scale remote sensing, sustainability
Table 3. The division of forest roads in the world.
Table 3. The division of forest roads in the world.
CountryTotal Length/kmDensity/
(m/hm2)		Grade I Grade II Grade III Others
Main RoadSubordinate RoadSkid RoadTemporary RoadRecreational Road
Germany1,209,000108.90Road width 3–4 m
Slope < 10%
Annual transport volumes 500–5000 m3		Annual transport volumes < 500 m3Road width < 3–4 m
Lower transport volumes		–Open forest tourism areas
Austria 297,30089.00–––––
France 30,10018.00Slope 2%–6%
Density of roads in plains 10 m/hm2
Density of roads in mountainous 35 m/hm2		Slope 2%–6%Road width 4–5 m
Density of plain skid roads 25 m/hm2
Density of mountain skid roads 40–50 m/hm2		––
Finland 130,00010.50Road width 6.5–8 mRoad width 3.6–5.5 m
Speed 60 km/h		Road width 3.6–5.5 m
Speed 40 km/h		––
Britain 26,60032.20Road width 7.3 m––––
Russia1,618,0001.46Annual transport volumes > 500,000 m3
Traffic volume 20–25 vehicles/day		Annual transport volume 150,000–500,000 m3
Traffic volume 25 vehicles/day		–Frozen rivers or paved roads in swamps–
Canada–10.60Road width 8–10 m
Slope 10%
Adverse slope 6%
Speed < 80 km/h		Road width 8–10 m
Slope 10%
Adverse slope 6%
Speed < 80 km/h		Road width 5–6 m
Slope 12%–14%
Adverse slope 8%–10%
Speed < 80 km/h		–Mostly located in nature reserves and forest parks
Korea17,2002.70Road width 3–4 m
Speed 14 km/h		Road width 3–4 m
Speed 14 km/h		–Access for large machinery, skid, and haul–
Japan137,0005.40Road width 4–5 m
Speed 20–40 km/h		Road width 3 m
Speed 15–30 km/h		Road width 2–3 m
Speed 15–20 km/h		––
India 155,8002.00–––––
New
Zealand		–15–20Plain and hill:
Road width 9 m, speed 70 km/h
Mountain:
Road width 8 m, speed 50 km/h
Traffic volume 80 vehicles/day		Road width 4.5 m
Traffic volume 20–80 vehicles/day		Plain and hill:
Road width 4.3 m, speed 40 km/h
Mountain:
Speed 30 km/h
Traffic volume 80 vehicles/day		Road width 2.5 m
Light four-wheel drive passing at low speeds		–
Data source: Study on Road Construction and Investment and Financing Management in Forestry Areas [13].
Table 4. The division of forest roads in Australia.
Table 4. The division of forest roads in Australia.
CountryTotal Length/kmDensity/
(m/hm2)		Grade IGrade IIGrade IIIGrade IVGrade V
Australia–15.00Road width > 7 m
Speed 50–80 km/h
Traffic volume > 100 vehicles/day		Road width > 5.5 m
Speed 30–70 km/h
Traffic volume 30–100 vehicles/day		Road width > 4 m
Speed 20–60 km/h
Traffic volume 20–50 vehicles/day		Road width > 4 m
Speed 40 km/h
Traffic volume 20 vehicles/day		Road width > 3 m
Limit the height and speed of vehicles
Traffic volume 10 vehicles/day
Data source: Study on Road Construction and Investment and Financing Management in Forestry Areas [13].
Table 5. The division of forest roads in the United States.
Table 5. The division of forest roads in the United States.
CountryTotal Length/kmDensity/(m/hm2)ToolFunctional ClassificationMaintenance LevelLength/kmRatio (%)
America612,00031–50 (private forests)
7.8 (state-owned forests)		Passenger vehicleMain road or subordinate road 3–5138,49523.0
Heavy truckOpen feeder road2338,96156.5
Non-motorized vehicleClosed feeder road1122,92020.0
Data source: Study on Road Construction and Investment and Financing Management in Forestry Areas [13].
Table 6. Investment, financing, and management mechanisms of forest roads in the world.
Table 6. Investment, financing, and management mechanisms of forest roads in the world.
CountryInvestment MechanismFinancing MechanismManagement Mechanism
GermanyManagement of the host stateJoint venture between forest owners and the governmentCo-management by forest owners and government
AustriaFederal government, state governments, and construction bodiesInvestor and government subsidies for forest road constructionCo-management by the forestry department, owners, and managers
FranceCommunity forests are financed by the State; private forests have diverse investments such as district governments, public interest groups, etc.Subsidy, funding, loanForestry departments under the districts introduce building charters for their respective areas
FinlandDirect inputs from forest owners and financial subsidies from the StateCo-financing by government and forest ownersManagement, construction and renovation by the Ministry of Transport and Communications, Railway Administration, local forest centers, private forest organizations, national forest organizations, Central Forestry Development Center (Tapio), Metla Forestry Research Institute, Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), and environmental protection authorities (EPAs).
BritainNational forests: British Forestry Commission
Private forests: Private forest owners		National forests: National Forestry Fund and Forestry Commission operating revenues and government grants
Private forests: Private forest owners		Construction management, project quality management, and fund management
RussiaFederal Government finances main roads; Russian forest service, local forest services, and forest lessees invest in other roadsCo-financing by the federal government, local governments, and forest lesseesHarvesters
AmericaSpecial fund of the USDA, consumers, Public institutions, private sector and co-financing for individualsFederal department of USDA Forest Service, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Bureau of Land Management Federal, local governments, etc.
CanadaFederal, local governmentsNational aid programs, local government financing plans, and IMF lendingDevelopment of road management mechanisms and technical protocols by local governments
JapanNational forest roads: special accounts;
Private forest roads: State finance,
local finance, and forest road builders		National forest roads: National forest management and state financial subsidies;
Private forest roads: financial aid, loans from Japan Finance Corporation and self-financing		National forest roads: bidding system;
Private forest roads: forest road builders
KoreaNational forest roads are built by the state; community forest roads are built by local self-governments; private forest roads are built by forest owners The State fully finances national forest roads; private forest roads may apply for government subsidies in addition to local self-governments, forest owners, and managers.National forest roads are managed by the forestry department; private forest roads are managed by local self-governments
IndiaForestry department and the state governmentsFinancial revenue, funded projectsBy the federal forestry department
AustraliaFollowing the “user pays” principle, including road owners, the treasury, domestic and foreign businesses, the British royal family, the British federal government, etc.Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), forestry department
New ZealandForest owner co-operative planning, funded by the governmentNew Zealand transport fund, local authorities, and loans to forest ownersDifferent regional and local committees, New Zealand Forest owners’ association (FOA), forest owners, state forestry department
Data source: Study on Road Construction and Investment and Financing Management in Forestry Areas [13].
Table 7. The division of forest roads in China.
Table 7. The division of forest roads in China.
ParameterGrade IGrade IIGrade IIIGrade IV
Main RoadSubordinate Road (Feeder Road)
Carriageway (m)7.06.05.04.5
Annual transportation volume (ton)≥100,000≥60,000≥40,000<40,000
Speed (km/h)30–6025–4020–3015–20
Vehicle loadForest—Grade 50
(Heavy vehicle)		Forest—Grade 25
(Medium-sized vehicle)		Forest—Grade 25
(Medium-sized vehicle)		Forest—Grade 25
(Medium-sized vehicle)
Turn-out laneTwo-laneTwo-lane/Single-lane (should not exceed 300 m where the roadbed width is less than 4.5 m)<500 m<500 m
Maximum longitudinal slope (%)4–75–87–9 (10)4–12 (14)
Road surfaceSub-high- or intermediate-type pavementIntermediate-type pavementIntermediate-type pavement or low-type pavement Low-type pavement or none
FunctionPermanent use, long-term maintenance, connecting external road networks, feeder roads, and timber lending, 5%–15% of the forest road networkSeasonal use, irregular maintenance, mainly by short-term timber vehicles, 15%–50% of the road networkInterior forest roads (excluding skidding roads), which account for the most significant proportion of the forest network, 55%–80%, have minor traffic flow, a service life of fewer than two years, a temporary road during production, the use of timely restoration of vegetation does not need to be maintained, and mainly timber short-term vehicle traffic
Data source: Technical Standards for Forestry Highway Engineering (LY5104-98) [13].
Table 8. The required data to be entered in the attribute table of the lookout tower layer.
Table 8. The required data to be entered in the attribute table of the lookout tower layer.
Lookout TowerUTM CoordinatesElevation (m)Tower Height (m)Smoke Visibility Height (m)Horizontal View
Angle (Degree)		Visibility Range (km)Vertical View Angle (Degree)
XY
Kandil634,8524,085,8188601010036015+/−90
Ölemez641,4414,081,0669201010036010+/−90
Çiçekbaba660,3664,100,55720201010036020+/−90
Buyancik669,4184,092,57211001010036020+/−90
Kepez676,9214,101,70614001010036020+/−90
Table 9. Data layers acquired for the HOI model in Jocassee.
Table 9. Data layers acquired for the HOI model in Jocassee.
Data LayerTypeSource
Roads (Pickens Co., SC)ShapeFileUS Census TIGER/Line®
Access roadsShapeFileJocassee Gorges Staff
Forest standsShapeFileJocassee Gorges Staff
Stream/Lake waterbodiesShapeFileUSGS NHD
Soil map unitsShapeFileNRCS SSURGO
Digital elevation model (Pickens, Oconee Co., SC)RasterSCDNR
Table 10. HOI criteria and their 0–4 class values.
Table 10. HOI criteria and their 0–4 class values.
Slope
(Percentage)		Skidding
Distance
(Meters)		Cost Distance to Major Highways (Meters)Stand Age (Years)Soil Suitability for
Harvesting Equipment		SMZ Buffers
Distance from Trout Stream/Lake Primary SMZ (Meters)Distance from
Non-Trout Stream/Lake
Primary SMZ (Meters)
CV CV CV CV CV CV CV
0%–10%40–20040–10,0004>614Well suited4>24.3844>12.1924
11%–20%3201–400310,001–20,000341–603 3
21%–30%2401–600220,001–30,000221–402Moderately suited2 2
31%–40%1601–800130,001–40,000110–201 1
>41%0>8010>40,0010Open area, 90Poorly suited00–24.38400–12.1920
CV: Class value.
Table 11. Summary of parameters of sensors onboard UAV.
Table 11. Summary of parameters of sensors onboard UAV.
ModelSpectral Range/nmResolution/PixelWeight/g
Multi-spectral sensorsSentera QuadRGB Red: 655 Red edge: 725 NIR: 8001248 × 950170
ADC MicroGreen: 520~600 Red: 630~690 NIR: 760~9002048 × 1536200
MiniMCA6Blue: 490 Green: 550 Red: 680 Red edge: 720 NIR1: 800 NIR2: 9001280 × 1024700
BuzzardBlue: 500 Green: 550 Red: 675 NIR1: 700 NIR2: 750(10) NIR3: 780(10)1280 × 1024500
Hyperspectral cameraModelSpectral Range/nmSpectral Resolution/nmWeight/g
Field Spec 4350~250035.4
Caia Sky-mini400~100044
Cubert S185450~95044.9
Laser radarModelMaximum Distance/mScanning Frequency/(Line/s)Weight/g
hummingbird25016/32738
Velodyne10016830
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xing, J.; Sun, S.; Huang, Q.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, Z. Application of Geoinformatics in Forest Planning and Management. Forests 2024, 15, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030439

AMA Style

Xing J, Sun S, Huang Q, Chen Z, Zhou Z. Application of Geoinformatics in Forest Planning and Management. Forests. 2024; 15(3):439. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xing, Jiani, Shufa Sun, Qiuhua Huang, Zhuchenxi Chen, and Zixuan Zhou. 2024. "Application of Geoinformatics in Forest Planning and Management" Forests 15, no. 3: 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15030439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop