Next Article in Journal
Fabrication of MgO-Y2O3 Composite Nanopowders by Combining Hydrothermal and Seeding Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Undrained Shear Strength and Settlement of Organic Soils under Embankment Loading Using Artificial Neural Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Online Monitoring Technology of Metal Powder Bed Fusion Processes: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117575, Singapore
2
Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(1), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010127
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 13 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing)
Additive manufacturing (AM) has grown and evolved rapidly in recent years. There are many exciting research and translational works in many areas of application, such as biomedical [1,2], aerospace [3,4] and electronics [5,6,7]. These advancements are typically coupled with materials development, which has resulted in more functionalities added to 3D printed parts, such as multi-material fabrications [8,9,10] and integration with machine learning or digital twins [11,12,13]. Such enhancements in functionalities have enabled the evolution of AM from a rapid prototyping tool to an actual manufacturing solution.
In this Special Issue, state-of-the-art research and review articles on emerging material systems for AM are collected, with a focus on the process–structure–properties relationships. In total, two reviews and thirteen original research articles are included. In their review article, Minasyan and Hussainova discussed the recent developments of ceramic particulate-reinforced aluminium alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion [14], while Hou et al. elaborated the use of monitoring systems for powder bed fusion processes with a focus on metals in their comprehensive review [15]. For original research, Gatões et al. studied the fabrication of different stainless steels using selective laser melting, a type of laser powder bed fusion technique [16]. In their study, Mally et al. benchmarked the mechanical properties of ferritic steels produced by selective laser melting with relevant forged parts [17]. Using selective laser melting as well, Koh et al. studied the fabrication of silica-reinforced steel matrix nanocomposites [18]. Lim et al. studied the bone conduction capacity of highly porous titanium scaffolds with different designs produced by selective laser melting [19]. Chen et al. studied the effect of laser scanning speed on the microstructure and mechanical properties of K418 nickel-based alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion [20]. Böhm et al. evaluated the feasibility of using a mixture of two aluminium alloys to eliminate solidification cracks formed during laser powder bed fusion [21]. Chen et al. studied the fabrication of bimetallic structures using TiNi-based shape memory alloy by laser-directed energy deposition [22]. Also using laser-directed energy deposition, Menon et al. attempted to quantify the process using multi-fidelity surrogate-based process mapping [23]. Hein et al. studied the effect of heat treatment on metastable β titanium alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion [24]. Romani et al. studied the metallization of recycled glass fibre-reinforced polymers that are processed by UV-assisted 3D printing [25]. Hailu et al. studied the effect of structure design on the performance of functionally graded materials produced by the MultiJet Fusion technique [26]. Marczyk et al. analysed the use of concrete–geopolymer hybrids reinforced with aramid roving for 3D concrete printing [27]. Yao et al. evaluated the feasibility of colour 3D printing by studying the pigment penetration in powder-based additive manufacturing [28].

Author Contributions

S.L.S. and W.Y.Y., writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luis, E.; Pan, H.M.; Bastola, A.K.; Bajpai, R.; Sing, S.L.; Song, J.; Yeong, W.Y. 3D Printed Silicone Meniscus Implants: Influence of the 3D Printing Process on Properties of Silicone Implants. Polymers 2020, 12, 2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Luis, E.; Pan, H.M.; Sing, S.L.; Bajpai, R.; Song, J.; Yeong, W.Y. 3D Direct Printing of Silicone Meniscus Implant Using a Novel Heat-Cured Extrusion-Based Printer. Polymers 2020, 12, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gradl, P.; Tinker, D.C.; Park, A.; Mireles, O.R.; Garcia, M.; Wilkerson, R.; Mckinney, C. Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 31, 6013–6044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Omiyale, B.O.; Olugbade, T.O.; Abioye, T.E.; Farayibi, P.K. Wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys for aerospace and automotive applications: A review. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 38, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huo, Z.; He, J.; Pu, H.; Luo, J.; Li, D. Design and printing of embedded conductive patterns in liquid crystal elastomer for programmable electrothermal actuation. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2022, 17, 881–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, J.; Yan, H.; Wang, C.; Gong, H.; Nie, Q.; Long, Y. 3D printing highly stretchable conductors for flexible electronics with low signal hysteresis. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2022, 17, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Monisha, M.; Agarwala, S. Biodegradable materials: Foundation of transient and sustainable electronics. Mater. Sci. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, J.M.; Sing, S.L.; Yeong, W.Y. Bioprinting of Multimaterials with Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing. Int. J. Bioprint. 2020, 6, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rao, J.; Sing, S.L.; Lim, J.C.W.; Yeong, W.Y.; Yang, J.; Fan, Z.; Hazell, P. Detection and characterisation of defects in directed energy deposited multi-material components using full waveform inversion and reverse time migration. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2022, 17, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bandyopadhyay, A.; Zhang, Y.; Onuike, B. Additive manufacturing of bimetallic structures. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2022, 17, 256–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nguyen, P.D.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Tao, Q.B.; Vogel, F.; Nguyen-Xuan, H. A data-driven machine learning approach for the 3D printing process optimisation. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2022, 17, 768–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lu, C.; Jia, X.; Lee, J.; Shi, J. Knowledge transfer using Bayesian learning for predicting the process-property relationship of Inconel alloys obtained by laser powder bed fusion. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2022, 17, 787–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, X.; Zeng, D.; Groeneveld-Meijer, W.; Manogharan, G. Additive manufacturing: A machine learning model of process-structure-property linkages for machining behavior of Ti-6Al-4V. Mater. Sci. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Minasyan, T.; Hussainova, I. Laser Powder-Bed Fusion of Ceramic Particulate Reinforced Aluminum Alloys: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huo, Z.-J.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, C.-G.; Zheng, J.; Tian, J.-M.; Ge, X.-H.; Liu, Y.-G. Online Monitoring Technology of Metal Powder Bed Fusion Processes: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 7598. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gatões, D.; Alves, R.; Alves, B.; Vieira, M.T. Selective Laser Melting and Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steels. Materials 2022, 15, 7575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mally, L.; Werz, M.; Weihe, S. Feasibility Study on Additive Manufacturing of Ferritic Steels to Meet Mechanical Properties of Safety Relevant Forged Parts. Materials 2022, 15, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koh, H.K.; Moo, J.G.S.; Sing, S.L.; Yeong, W.Y. Use of Fumed Silica Nanostructured Additives in Selective Laser Melting and Fabrication of Steel Matrix Nanocomposites. Materials 2022, 15, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lim, H.-K.; Ryu, M.; Woo, S.-H.; Song, I.-S.; Choi, Y.-J.; Lee, U.-L. Bone Conduction Capacity of Highly Porous 3D-Printed Titanium Scaffolds Based on Different Pore Designs. Materials 2021, 14, 3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Z.; Lu, Y.; Luo, F.; Zhang, S.; Wei, P.; Yao, S.; Wang, Y. Effect of Laser Scanning Speed on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Laser-Powder-Bed-Fused K418 Nickel-Based Alloy. Materials 2022, 15, 3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Böhm, C.; Werz, M.; Weihe, S. Practical Approach to Eliminate Solidification Cracks by Supplementing AlMg4.5Mn0.7 with AlSi10Mg Powder in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Materials 2022, 15, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, Y.; Rios, C.O.; McLain, B.; Newkirk, J.W.; Liou, F. TiNi-Based Bi-Metallic Shape-Memory Alloy by Laser-Directed Energy Deposition. Materials 2022, 15, 3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Menon, N.; Mondal, S.; Basak, A. Multi-Fidelity Surrogate-Based Process Mapping with Uncertainty Quantification in Laser Directed Energy Deposition. Materials 2022, 15, 2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hein, M.; Dias, N.F.L.; Pramanik, S.; Stangier, D.; Hoyer, K.-P.; Tillmann, W.; Schaper, M. Heat Treatments of Metastable β Titanium Alloy Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Materials 2022, 15, 3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Romani, A.; Tralli, P.; Levi, M.; Turri, S.; Suriano, R. Metallization of Recycled Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymers Processed by UV-Assisted 3D Printing. Materials 2022, 15, 6242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hailu, Y.M.; Nazir, A.; Lin, S.-C.; Jeng, J.-Y. The Effect of Functional Gradient Material Distribution and Patterning on Torsional Properties of Lattice Structures Manufactured Using MultiJet Fusion Technology. Materials 2021, 14, 6521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marczyk, J.; Ziejewska, C.; Korniejenko, K.; Łach, M.; Marzec, W.; Góra, M.; Dziura, P.; Sprince, A.; Szechyńska-Hebda, M.; Hebda, M. Properties of 3D Printed Concrete–Geopolymer Hybrids Reinforced with Aramid Roving. Materials 2022, 15, 6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yao, D.; Yuan, J.; Tian, J.; Wang, L.; Chen, G. Pigment Penetration Characterization of Colored Boundaries in Powder-Based Color 3D Printing. Materials 2022, 15, 3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sing, S.L.; Yeong, W.Y. Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing. Materials 2023, 16, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010127

AMA Style

Sing SL, Yeong WY. Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing. Materials. 2023; 16(1):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sing, Swee Leong, and Wai Yee Yeong. 2023. "Emerging Materials for Additive Manufacturing" Materials 16, no. 1: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop