Next Article in Journal
Properties of Concrete Using Treated Low-Class Recycled Coarse Aggregate and Blast Furnace Slag Sand
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Ageing on the Tracking Characteristics of High-Temperature Vulcanized Silicone Rubber Hybrid Composites for High Voltage Insulation
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Performance of a Low-Carbon Foam Material of Fly-Ash-Based Foamed Geopolymer for the Goaf Filling
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparison Study on the Characteristics of Nanofibrils Isolated from Fibers and Parenchyma Cells in Bamboo
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Superhydrophobic Methylated Silica Sol for Effective Oil–Water Separation

Materials 2020, 13(4), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040842
by Jiao Li 1, Hao Ding 2,3, Heqiang Zhang 1, Chunlin Guo 1, Xiaoyan Hong 1, Luyi Sun 2,3,* and Fuchuan Ding 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2020, 13(4), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040842
Submission received: 21 January 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2020 / Accepted: 10 February 2020 / Published: 13 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Multi-Functional Materials and Nanocomposites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript deals with the synthesis of superhydrophobic nanoparticles by using the Stober method. A suitable coupling agent was added to the standard method in order to confer the superhydrophobic behavior to the produced particles. The described method, being free of Fluorine, appears very interesting and promising. The manuscript is well structured and the read is fluidic and clear. However, in my opinion, some minor revisions should be performed.

Line 104: Figure 1: the reaction scheme does not appear correctly; it is suggested to substitute it. Line 133: about the FT-IR, the authors are invited to better explain the method employed to estimate the graft ratio of –CH3. Do the authors have evidence of the coating’s adhesion on the substrate? It could be interesting to report on it. Line 167: Figure 4: please, insert an enlargement of the curved between 400 and 700 nm, in order to highlight the little differences in transmittance. Line 188: please, add some other comments about the Fig. 7 results, maybe also adding an EDS to clarify the elements nature. Line 199: please do you mind to give evidence (by inserting a photo) of the formation of the negative meniscus? Lines 195-219 and Figure 8: in the test, please better explain the experiments, the employed liquids and the nature of the treated and untreated samples (e.g., PET or cotton). Consequently, in Figure 8, add more labels for clarity. Line 214: please explain the method employed to assess the separation efficiency (to be add to the Experimental- Characterization paragraph) Please discuss better and longer introduction, results and conclusions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper reports on new silica sol exhibiting superhydrophobic property

and application for O/W separation.

 

Including video data, results are presented clearly to support main points 

of significance and description (explanation) of this study. Hence, it should be accepted almost as it is.

 

At the proof stage, please improve Figure 1, which was incorrectly shown 

at least on my PC.

 

That's all.

  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript includes the preparation of modified silica particle to use the surface modification. The manuscript is well written, but some points should be improved as shown follows,

1) In introduction, please mention the engineering motivation of oil/ water separation, that should be compared with other techniques.

2) please change Figure 1. it is hard to see.

3) Figure 6 should be deleted because no discussion here ( about the deformation and elasticity)

4) how to determine the concentration of oil. Was it gas chromatography? if so please mention to experimental

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is now able to be published.

 

 

Back to TopTop