Next Article in Journal
Influence of Titanium Surface Porosity on Adhesive Strength of Coatings Containing Calcium Silicate
Next Article in Special Issue
The hetero-Friedel-Crafts-Bradsher Cyclizations with Formation of Ring Carbon-Heteroatom (P, S) Bonds, Leading to Organic Functional Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Cathodoluminescence Spectroscopic Stress Analysis for Silicon Oxide Film and Its Damage Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Memoriam: Professor Jarosław Lewkowski (1966–2019)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 20
10.3390/ma13204492
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Convenient and Efficient Synthesis of Functionalized 2-Sulfenylindoles

by
Justyna Doroszuk
,
Mateusz Musiejuk
,
Bartosz Jędrzejewski
,
Juliusz Walczak
and
Dariusz Witt
*
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(20), 4492; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204492
Submission received: 23 September 2020 / Revised: 29 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 October 2020 / Published: 10 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Problems of the Organic Chemistry of Sulfur and Selenium)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A simple, efficient, and practical sulfenylation at the C2 position of N-tosylindoles under mild conditions was developed. The designed transformation is based on the reaction of N-tosylindoles with BuLi and S-alkyl, and S-aryl phosphorodithioates or thiotosylates to produce 2-sulfenylindoles in moderate to high yields. The presence of additional hydroxy, carboxy, or amino functionalities did not disturb the formation of products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Indole is a structural functionality found in a diversity of biologically active molecules [1]. The functionalization of an indole ring by a variety of substituents and methods has been intensively studied [2,3,4]. These indole derivatives were used as blue-light emitting materials [5], materials for solar cells [6], potential prodrugs [7], and the dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) inhibitors [8].
Sulfenylindoles, as important derivatives of indoles, can be frequently found in medicinal and bioorganic chemistry. Selected examples are presented in Figure 1.
They were applied in drug discovery and development for the treatment of various diseases. Compounds for the treatment of cancer [9], HIV [10,11], vascular [12], heart disease [13], respiratory disorders [14], and allergies [15] were developed. These compounds were also applied as COX-2 inhibitors in medicinal chemistry [16,17] and potent inhibitors of tubulin polymerization [18,19].
There are many efficient methodologies for the synthesis of sulfenylindoles reported in the literature [20,21,22,23,24,25]. Among them, the direct sulfenylation of indoles is one of the most efficient and common strategies [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Due to the nucleophilic properties of an indole ring, it can be easily functionalized at the C3 position by using a variety of electrophiles. The formation of carbon–carbon bonds and carbon–heteroatom bonds can be observed according to the structure of electrophiles. The 3-Sulfenylindoles are readily available by the reaction of indoles with a variety of sulfenylating reagents. The most commonly utilized reagents are sulfenyl halides [34], thiols [35], disulfides [36,37,38], arylsulfonyl hydrazides [39,40], arylsulfonyl chlorides [41,42], sulfinic acids [43], and sulfonium salts [44,45]. Usually, sulfenylation of indoles proceeds at the C3 position of an indole ring. In contrast, sulfenylation at the C2 position of indoles is difficult but has also been accomplished. The most common strategies involve introducing a directing group at the N1 position (Scheme 1A), [46] blocking the C3 position, [47] using a N-(thio)succinimide/trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) reaction system (Scheme 1B) [48], and removing the proton at the C2 position [49,50,51,52].
Other practical procedures involve the reaction of copper-catalyzed coupling of indoline-2-thiones with aryl iodides (Scheme 1C) [53], acid-catalyzed rearrangement of 3-sulfenylindole [54,55], and multicomponent synthesis of thieno[2,3-b]indole derivatives [56,57,58]. Recently, regioselective sulfenylation at the C2 position of indoles with sodium arylsulfinates has been accomplished in the presence of TMSOTf as a promoter (Scheme 1D) [59].
Although the presented methods provided 2-sulfenylated indoles, the applied harsh conditions were incompatible with various functional groups. Moreover, in most cases, the arylsulfenyl group can be introduced in the C2 position. Thus, the development of an efficient and versatile strategy for the synthesis of 2-sulenylindoles possessing alkylsulfenyl and arylsulfenyl functionalities with additional functional groups is highly desirable. In this context, we report a regioselective sulfenylation at the C2 position of N-tosylindoles with sulfenylating reagents (Scheme 1E). Earlier studies demonstrated the application of readily available 5,5-dimethyl-2-thioxo-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinane-2-disulfanyl derivatives for the preparation of functionalized unsymmetrical disulfides [60,61,62,63,64], α-sulfenylated carbonyl compounds [65], and unsymmetrical alkynyl sulfides [66,67].

2. Materials and Methods

All 1-((4-methylphenyl)sulfonyl)indoles (1a–d) were obtained from indole, 5-methoxyindole, 5-bromoindole, and 5-aminoindole, respectively. Sodium hydride and p-toluenesulfonyl chloride were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All bromides required for preparation thiotosylates 3 were purchased from ProChimia (Sopot, Poland). The 5,5-Dimethyl-2-thioxo-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinane-2-disulfanyl derivatives [60,61,62,63,64,65] 2 and thiotosylates [67] 3 were prepared by the literature methods. Sodium 4-methylbenzenesulfonothioate was obtained from sodium 4-methylbenzenesulfinate purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) is available from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Tetrahydrofuran was pre-dried over KOH pellets and distilled. Subsequently, tetrahydrofurane (THF) was dried by heating under reflux over potassium in the presence of benzophenone as an indicator and distilled. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with silica gel Supelco UV254 (St. Louis, MI, USA). Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). NMR spectra were recorded on Brucker 400 MHz spectrometers. The residual solvent peak was used as the internal reference (CDCl3: δ = 7.26 ppm for 1H, δ = 77.0 ppm for 13C). IR spectra were recorded on Nicolet Is50 Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (Wien, Austria) by Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) method. Melting points were measured with Gallenkamp 7936B apparatus (Warwick, UK).

2.1. General Procedure for the Preparation of 2-sulfenyl-1-((4-methylphenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-indoles 8 from Phosphorodithioates 2

To a stirred, cooled to 0 °C solution of indole 1a–d (1 mmol) and N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine (1 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) was added dropwise n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexane; 1 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min. Then the solution of phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivative 2 (1 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) was added. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 15 min. The mixture was diluted with Et2O (30 mL) and washed with water (10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and concentrated under vacuum. The products were purified by column chromatography.

2.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of 2-sulfenyl-1-((4-methylphenyl)sulfonyl)-1H-indoles 8 from Thiotosylates 3

To a stirred, cooled to 0 °C solution of indole 1a–d (1 mmol) and N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine (1 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) was added dropwise n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexane; 1 mmol). The mixture was stirred in 0 °C for 5 min. Then the solution of thiotosylates 3 (1 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) was added. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 15 min. The mixture was diluted with Et2O (30 mL) and washed with water (10 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under vacuum. The products were purified by column chromatography.
Synthesis of starting materials and 2-sulfenylindoles 8 with analytical data and copy of IR, and NMR spectra are in the Supplementary Materials.

3. Results and Discussion

The preliminary determination of the conditions was performed on N-tosylindole 1a to obtain the required 2-sulfenylindole 8. The sulfenylation at the C2 position of indoles was investigated, employing various electrophilic sulfenylating compounds 2–7 to determine the most efficient reagents. The results are summarized in Table 1.
By using didodecyl disulfide 4 and diphenyl disulfide 7, expected products 8a and 8b were produced in 72% and 95% yields, respectively. It appeared that diaryl disulfides were more effective than dialkyl disulfides in this synthesis (Table 1; entries 3 and 6). Disulfide 7 is probably the better electrophile due to the better leaving group properties of the aryl thiolate anion. However, the main disadvantage of disulfides is the introduction of only half of a starting material into the product.
When 1a was treated with N-(thiododecyl)phthalimide 5 or N-(thiododecyl)succinimide 6, indole 8a was obtained in 55% and 53% yield, respectively (Table 1; entries 4 and 5). Although N-(thiododecyl)phthalimide or N-(thiododecyl)succinimide are known as good electrophilic reagents, it looks like leaving groups, phthalimide or succinimide anions, are less efficient for examined transformation. The best yield was observed by using S-dodecyl toluenethiosulfonate 3a or 1-((5,5-dimethyl-2-thioxo-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinan-2-yl)disulfanyl) dodecane 2a as the sulfenylating reagent, with which 8a was obtained in 83% and 72% yields, respectively (Table 1; entries 1 and 2). From a practical point of view, corresponding thiosulfonates and 5,5-dimethyl-2-thioxo-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinane-2-disulfanyl derivatives are readily available from thiols or appropriate alkyl halides and were selected as sulfenylating reagents for further studies. In addition, THF was the best solvent to accomplish sulfenylation at the C2 position. N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylethane-1,2-diamine (TMEDA) was added to avoid the aggregation of regioselective [49] generated 2-lithium-N-tosylindoles and to improve their reactivity.
When the most efficient reagent and a useful set of conditions were determined, then we examined the scope of the reaction by subjecting indole derivatives 1a–d to the sulfenylation at the C2 position by a variety of phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivatives 2. The results are summarized in Table 2.
As shown in Table 2, the formation of 2-sulfenylated indoles 8 was accomplished when the indole ring was not substituted (Table 2; entries 1–9) in 65–94% yields. The presence of an electron-donating or an electron-withdrawing group at the C5 position did not disturb the progress of the reaction, and appropriate indoles 8 were obtained in 69–91% yields (Table 2; entries 10–23). When the protected amino group was attached in the position C5 of an indole ring, then 2-sulfenylated indoles 8 were obtained in lower yields 65–78%. The formation of products 8 can be accomplished for alkyl and aryl derivatives 2. Moreover, the presence of additional functional groups did not affect reactivity, and functionalized 2-sulfenyl indoles were produced in good yields.
Although the above reactions were successful, we were interested in that they improved the formation of 2-sulfenylated indoles 8 by using thiotosylates 3 as a sulfenylating reagent. We selected indoles 1a–d and appropriate thiotosylates 3 with the same substitution pattern to clarify the effect of the sulfenylating reagent. The results are summarized in Table 3.
As demonstrated, the expected 2-sulfenylindoles 8 were obtained in good yields independent of the substitution pattern of the indole ring. When the indole ring was not substituted at the C5 position, the yield of 2-sulfenylindoles 8a–8i was in the range 68–92% (Table 3; entries 1–9). The presence of an electron-donating group at the C5 position did not disturb the reaction and 2-sulfenylindoles 8j–8p were obtained in 67–82% yields (Table 3; entries 10–16). The substitution of the indole ring at the C5 position by an electron-withdrawing substituent did not affect the reactivity, and the corresponding 2-sulfenylindoles 8r–8y were produced in good yields (68–86%) (Table 3; entries 17–23). However, when the protected amino group was present in the C5 position, a slightly lower yield (62–79%) of products 8z–8af was observed (Table 3; entries 24–30).
Interestingly, the developed sulfenylation method can be applied to either S-alkyl thiotosylates, or S-aryl thiotosylates. The presence of additional functional groups, such as ester, cyano, hydroxy, and protected amino moieties or carbon–carbon double bonds, did not disturb the formation of 2-sulfenylindoles 8. However, using thiotosylates 3 instead of phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivatives 2 as a sulfenylating reagent did not improve the yield of product 8. Although both methods provided 2-sulfenylindoles 8 in comparable yields and tolerance of additional functional groups, the using of thiotosylates 3 seems to be more convenient. These compounds are readily available from the reaction of appropriate alkyl halides and sodium thiotosylate or thiols and tosyl bromide.
The suggested mechanism to explain the course of the reactions involves the initial regioselective formation of the 2-lithium-N-tosylindoles through the reaction of BuLi with N-tosylindoles 1. The resulting lithium salt reacts with electrophilic phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivatives 2 or thiotosylates 3 to yield 2-sulfenylindoles 8 (Figure 2).
The tosyl group protects the indole functionality and is also used as directing metalation group [68] to produce 2-lithium-N-tosylindoles. The regioselective proton removal is responsible for exclusive 2-sulfenylated N-tosylindole 8 formation. Although a variety of protected compounds 8 were obtained, we were interested in using them as starting materials for the preparation of nonprotected indoles. The standard basic conditions for tosyl group removal were applied [69]. Selected compounds 8c and 8k were treated with NaOH in MeOH/H2O, and the resulting mixture was refluxed overnight under nitrogen (Scheme 2).
As demonstrated, the formation of nonprotected indole 9 was convenient and effective. When 2-sulfenylindoles 8c and 8k were treated with NaOH in methanol (conditions were not optimized), nonprotected products 9c and 9k were obtained in 96% and 94% yields, respectively. This deprotection method, together with the developed regioselective sulfenylation of N-tosylindoles 1 at the C2 position, gives an attractive alternative for the preparation of 3-unsubstituted nonprotected 2-sulfenylindoles.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we developed a convenient, efficient, and versatile regioselective sulfenylation of 3-unsubstituted N-tosylindoles 1 to access a variety of new functionalized indole derivatives. These methods were accomplished with readily available phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivatives 2 or thiotosylates 3 as the sulfenylating reagents, and regioselectively generated 2-lithium-N-tosylindoles. Moreover, developed methods can be applied to S-alkyl and S-aryl derivatives of 2 and 3. The reactions were accomplished under mild conditions and the presence of various functional groups did not disturb the formation of 2-sulfenylindoles 8.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/20/4492/s1: Synthesis of starting materials and 2-sulfenylindoles 8 with analytical data and copy of IR, and NMR spectra.

Author Contributions

J.D., synthesis of starting materials and products, leading investigator; M.M., synthesis of starting materials and products, equal investigator; B.J., synthesis of starting materials and products, equal investigator; J.W., synthesis of starting materials, supporting investigator; D.W., project management, supervision, manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre (NCN), grant number 2015/19/B/ST5/03359.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wan, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, C.; Yan, M.; Tang, Z.I. A privileged scaffold for the design of anti-cancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 111691–111709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Poulsen, T.B.; Jørgensen, K.A. Catalytic Asymmetric Friedel−Crafts Alkylation Reactions—Copper Showed the Way. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2903–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Joucla, L.; Djakovitch, L. Transition Metal-Catalysed, Direct and Site-Selective N1-, C2- or C3-Arylation of the Indole Nucleus: 20 Years of Improvements. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 673–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G. Update 1 of Synthesis and Functionalization of Indoles Through Palladium-Catalyzed Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 215–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hwu, J.R.; Hsu, Y.C.; Josephrajan, T.; Tsay, S.-C. Fine tuning of blue photoluminescence from indoles for device fabrication. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 3084–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cho, I.; Jeon, N.J.; Kwon, O.K.; Kim, D.W.; Jung, E.H.; Noh, J.H.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I.; Park, S.Y. Indolo[3,2-b]indole-based crystalline hole transporting material for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 734–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Laube, M.; Gassner, C.; Kniess, T.; Pietzsch, J. Synthesis and Cyclooxygenase Inhibition of Sulfonamide-Substituted(Dihydro)Pyrrolo[3,2,1-hi]indoles and Their Potential Prodrugs. Molecules 2019, 24, 3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lechner, C.; Flaßhoff, M.; Falke, H.; Preu, L.; Loaëc, N.; Meijer, L.; Knapp, S.; Chaikuad, A.; Kunick, C. [b]-Annulated Halogen-Substituted Indoles as Potential DYRK1A Inhibitors. Molecules 2019, 24, 4090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Avis, I.; Martnez, A.; Tauler, J.; Zudaire, E.; Mayburd, A.; Abu-Ghazaleh, R.; Ondrey, F.; Mulshine, J.L. Inhibitors of the Arachidonic Acid Pathway and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Ligands Have Superadditive Effects on Lung Cancer Growth Inhibition. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4181–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Silvestri, R.; Artico, M.; Bruno, B.; Massa, S.; Novellino, E.; Greco, G.; Marongiu, M.E.; Pani, A.; De Montis, A.; La Colla, P. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 5H-indolo[3,2-b][1,5]benzothiazepine derivatives, designed as conformationally constrained analogues of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor L-737,126. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 1998, 9, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ragno, R.; Coluccia, A.; La Regina, G.; De Martino, G.; Piscitelli, F.; Lavecchia, A.; Novellino, E.; Bergamini, A.; Ciaprini, C.; Sinistro, A.; et al. Design, Molecular Modeling, Synthesis, and Anti-HIV-1 Activity of New Indolyl Aryl Sulfones. Novel Derivatives of the Indole-2-carboxamide. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3172–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhou, N.; Zeller, W.; Krohn, M.; Anderson, H.; Zhang, J.; Onua, E.; Kiselyov, A.S.; Ramirez, J.; Halldorsdottir, G.; Andresson, P.; et al. 3,4-Disubstituted indole acylsulfonamides: A novel series of potent and selective human EP3 receptor antagonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 123–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Funk, C.D. Leukotriene modifiers as potential therapeutics for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ainge, D.; Butters, M.; Merifield, E.; Ramakrishnan, R.; Rayapati, R.N.; Sharma, P.R.; Thomson, C. Intermediates and processes for the preparation of 4-(acetylamino)-3-[(4-chlorophenyl)thio]-2-methyl-1H-indole acetic acid. PCT Int. Appl. WO Patent 2011004182 A1, 13 January 2011. [Google Scholar]
  15. Unangst, P.C.; Connor, D.T.; Stabler, S.R.; Weikert, R.J.; Carethers, M.E.; Kennedy, J.A.; Thueson, D.O.; Chestnut, J.C.; Adolphson, R.L.; Conroy, M.C. Novel indolecarboxamidotetrazoles as potential antiallergy agents. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 1360–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maeda, Y.; Koyabu, M.; Nishimura, T.; Uemura, S. Vanadium-Catalyzed Sulfenylation of Indoles and 2-Naphthols with Thiols under Molecular Oxygen. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7688–7693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campbell, J.A.; Broka, C.A.; Gong, L.; Walker, K.A.M.; Wang, J.-H. A new synthesis of 3-arylthioindoles as selective COX-2 inhibitors using PIFA. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4073–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. De Martino, G.; La Regina, G.; Coluccia, A.; Edler, M.C.; Barbera, M.C.; Brancale, A.; Wilcox, E.; Hamel, E.; Artico, M.; Silvestri, R. Arylthioindoles, Potent Inhibitors of Tubulin Polymerization. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6120–6123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Martino, G.; Edler, M.C.; La Regina, G.; Coluccia, A.; Barbera, M.C.; Barrow, D.; Nicholson, R.I.; Chiosis, G.; Brancale, A.; Hamel, E.; et al. New Arylthioindoles:  Potent Inhibitors of Tubulin Polymerization. 2. Structure−Activity Relationships and Molecular Modeling Studies. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Cho, C.H.; Larock, R.C. A Novel Synthetic Route to 3-Sulfenyl- and 3-Selenylindoles by n-Bu4NI-Induced Electrophilic Cyclization. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Guo, Y.J.; Tang, R.Y.; Li, J.H.; Zhong, P.; Zhang, X.G. Palladium-Catalyzed Annulation of 2-(1-Alkynyl)benzenamines with Disulfides: Synthesis of 3-Sulfenylindoles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2615–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, Z.; Hong, L.; Liu, R.; Shen, J.; Zhou, X. Copper-catalyzed chalcogenoamination of 2-alkynylanilines with dichalcogenides for one-step synthesis of 3-sulfenylindoles and 3-selenylindoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1343–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, J.; Li, P.; Chen, W.; Wang, L. An efficient synthesis of 2-bromo(chloro)-3-selenyl(sulfenyl)indoles via tandem reactions of 2-(gem-dibromo(chloro)vinyl)anilines with diselenides(disulfides). Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10052–10054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chitra, S.; Paul, N.; Muthusubramanian, S.; Manisankar, P. Solvent based selectivity in the synthesis of di(2-aryl-1H-3-indolyl) sulfides and 1-aryl-2-[(2-aryl-1H-3-indolyl)sulfanyl]-1-ethanones. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 1432–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Han, D.; Li, Z.; Fan, R. Oxidative Nucleophilic Cyclization of 2-Alkynylanilines with Thiophenols under Metal-Free Conditions. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 6508–6511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tudge, M.; Tamiya, M.; Savarin, C.; Humphrey, G.R. Development of a Novel, Highly Efficient Halide-Catalyzed Sulfenylation of Indoles. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 565–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yadav, J.S.; Subba Reddy, B.V.; Reddy, Y.J.; Praneeth, K. Iron(III) Chloride: A Versatile Catalyst for the Practical Synthesis of 3-Sulfenylindoles. Synthesis 2009, 1520–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fang, X.L.; Tang, R.Y.; Zhong, P.; Li, J.H. Iron-Catalyzed Sulfenylation of Indoles with Disulfides Promoted by a Catalytic Amount of Iodine. Synthesis 2009, 4183–4189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silveira, C.C.; Mendes, S.R.; Wolf, L.; Martins, G.M. The use of anhydrous CeCl3 as a catalyst for the synthesis of 3-sulfenyl indoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2014–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, D.; Chen, J.; Dan, W.; Ding, J.; Liu, M.; Wu, H. A Metal-Free Sulfenylation and Bromosulfenylation of Indoles: Controllable Synthesis of 3-Arylthioindoles and 2-Bromo-3-arylthioindoles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 2123–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marcantoni, E.; Cipolletti, R.; Marsili, L.; Menichetti, S.; Properzi, R.; Viglianisi, C. An Efficient Catalytic Method for Regioselective Sulfenylation of Electron-Rich Aza-Aromatics at Room Temperature. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, C.; Wan, J.P.; Wen, C. Synthesis of 3-sulfenylated indoles by a simple NaOH promoted sulfenylation reaction. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 35528–35530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, H.; Bao, X.; Song, Y.; Qu, J.; Wang, B. Iodine-catalysed versatile sulfenylation of indoles with thiophenols: Controllable synthesis of mono- and bis-arylthioindoles. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 8885–8891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Raban, M.; Chern, L.J. Reactions of arenesulfenyl chlorides with indole. Carbon-13 and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of 3-(arylthio)indoles. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1688–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schlosser, K.M.; Krasutsky, A.P.; Hamilton, H.W.; Reed, J.E.; Sexton, K. A Highly Efficient Procedure for 3-Sulfenylation of Indole-2-carboxylates. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 819–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Browder, C.C.; Mitchell, M.O.; Smith, R.L.; el-Sulayman, G. Thiomethylation of indole and haloindole zinc salts. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6245–6247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Z.; Hong, J.; Zhou, X. An efficient and clean CuI-catalyzed chalcogenylation of aromatic azaheterocycles with dichalcogenides. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 3690–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ge, W.; Wei, Y. Iodine-catalyzed oxidative system for 3-sulfenylation of indoles with disulfides using DMSO as oxidant under ambient conditions in dimethyl carbonate. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2066–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, F.L.; Tian, S.K. Iodine-Catalyzed Regioselective Sulfenylation of Indoles with Sulfonyl Hydrazides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4929–4932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, X.; Xu, Y.; Wu, W.; Jiang, C.; Qi, C.; Jiang, H. Copper-Catalyzed Aerobic Oxidative N-S Bond Functionalization for C-S Bond Formation: Regio- and Stereoselective Synthesis of Sulfones and Thioethers. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 7911–7915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, Q.; Zhao, D.; Qin, X.; Lan, J.; You, J. Synthesis of di(hetero)aryl sulfides by directly using arylsulfonyl chlorides as a sulfur source. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9188–9190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, M.; Huang, Z.T.; Zhen, Q.Y. Visible light-induced 3-sulfenylation of N-methylindoles with arylsulfonyl chlorides. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11686–11688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, C.R.; Ding, L.H. Byproduct promoted regioselective sulfenylation of indoles with sulfinic acids. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 2251–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rao, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Sun, X.; Cao, S. K2S2O8/arenesulfinate: An unprecedented thiolating system enabling selective sulfenylation of indoles under metal-free conditions. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 49165–49169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xiao, F.; Xie, H.; Liu, S.; Deng, G.J. Iodine-Catalyzed Regioselective Sulfenylation of Indoles with Sodium Sulfinates. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gensch, T.; Klauck, F.J.R.; Glorius, F. Cobalt-Catalyzed C−H Thiolation through Dehydrogenative Cross-Coupling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11287–11291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nalbandian, C.J.; Miller, E.M.; Toenjes, S.T.; Gustafson, J.L. A conjugate Lewis base-Brønsted acid catalyst for the sulfenylation of nitrogen containing heterocycles under mild conditions. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 1494–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hostier, T.; Ferey, V.; Ricci, G.; Pardoa, D.G.; Cossy, J. TFA-promoted direct C–H sulfenylation at the C2 position of non-protected indoles. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13898–13901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Saulnier, M.G.; Gribble, G.W. Generation and reactions of 3-lithio-1-(phenylsulfonyl)indole. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 757–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Katritzky, A.R.; Lue, P.; Chen, Y.X. An alternative route to 2-substituted indoles via N-aminal-directed lithiation. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3688–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fukuda, T.; Mine, Y.; Iwao, M. Selective C-3 and C-2 lithiation of 1-(2,2-diethylbutanoyl)indole. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 975–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Qian, D.C.; Alford, P.E.; Kishbaugh, T.L.S.; Jones, S.T.; Gribble, G.W. 1,2-Bis(phenylsulfonyl)indole as an acceptor of organocuprate nucleophiles. Arkivoc 2010, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhou, S.; Xiao, G.; Liang, Y. Copper-catalyzed synthesis of 2-sulfenylindoles from indoline-2-thiones and aryl iodides. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hamel, P.; Girard, Y.; Atkinson, J.G. Acid-catalysed isomerization of indol-3-yl sulphides to indol-2-yl sulphides: Unexpected intermolecular nature of the rearrangement. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1989, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hamel, P.; Girard, Y.; Atkinson, J.G. Acid-catalyzed isomerization of 3-indolyl sulfides to 2-indolyl sulfides: First synthesis of 3-unsubstituted 2-arylthioindoles. Evidence for a complex intermolecular process. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2694–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, B.; Ni, P.; Huang, H.; Xiao, F.; Deng, G.-J. Three-Component Thieno[2,3-b]indole Synthesis from Indoles, Alkenes or Alkynes and Sulfur Powder under Metal-Free Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 4300–4304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Prochnow, T.; Maroneze, A.; Back, D.F.; Zeni, G. Synthesis of 3-(Organochalcogen) Chalcogenazolo Indoles via Cascade Cyclization of N-Alkynylindoles. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 2891–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nguyenab, T.T.; Tran, P.H. One-pot multicomponent synthesis of thieno[2¨C-b]indoles catalyzed by a magnetic nanoparticle-supported [Urea]4[ZnCl2] deep eutectic solvent. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 9663–9671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ji, Y.-Z.; Li, H.-J.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Wu, Y.-C. Switchable regioselection of C–H thiolation of indoles using different TMS counterions. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 11864–11867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Antoniow, S.; Witt, D. A Novel and Efficient Synthesis of Unsymmetrical Disulfides. Synthesis 2007, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lach, S.; Demkowicz, S.; Witt, D. An efficient and convenient synthesis of unsymmetrical disulfides from thioacetates. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 7021–7023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Szymelfejnik, M.; Demkowicz, S.; Rachon, J.; Witt, D. Functionalization of Cysteine Derivatives by Unsymmetrical Disulfide Bond Formation. Synthesis 2007, 3528–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kowalczyk, J.; Barski, P.; Witt, D.; Grzybowski, B.A. Versatile and Efficient. Synthesis of ω-Functionalized Asymmetric Disulfides via Sulfenyl Bromide Adducts. Langmuir 2007, 23, 2318–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Demkowicz, S.; Rachon, J.; Witt, D. A Versatile and Convenient Preparation of Unsymmetrical Diaryl Disulfides. Synthesis 2008, 2033–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Okragla, E.; Demkowicz, S.; Rachon, J.; Witt, D. A Convenient and Efficient α-Sulfenylation of Carbonyl Compounds. Synthesis 2009, 1720–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Doroszuk, J.; Musiejuk, M.; Demkowicz, S.; Rachon, J.; Witt, D. Convenient and efficient synthesis of functionalized unsymmetrical alkynyl sulfides. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 105449–105453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Doroszuk, J.; Musiejuk, M.; Ponikiewski, Ł.; Witt, D. Convenient and Efficient Diastereoselective Preparation of Functionalized Z-Alkenyl Sulfides. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 6333–6337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Desarbre, E.; Coudret, S.; Meheust, C.; Merour, J.-V. Synthesis of 2-Substituted-lH-Pyrrolo[2,3-b]Pyridines: Preparation of 7-Azaolivacine Analogue and 7-Azaindolopyridopyrimidine Derivatives. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3637–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kozikowski, A.P.; Chen, Y.-Y. Intramolecular nitrile oxide cycloaddition (INOC) reactions in the indole series. 2. Total synthesis of racemic and optically active paliclavine and 5-epi-paliclavine. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 5248–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 04492 g001 550
Figure 1. Selected examples of biologically active sulfenylindoles.
Figure 1. Selected examples of biologically active sulfenylindoles.
Materials 13 04492 g001
Materials 13 04492 sch001 550
Scheme 1. General strategies for the synthesis of 2-sulfenylindoles (A–D) and our new approach (E).
Scheme 1. General strategies for the synthesis of 2-sulfenylindoles (A–D) and our new approach (E).
Materials 13 04492 sch001
Materials 13 04492 g002 550
Figure 2. Plausible reaction mechanism.
Figure 2. Plausible reaction mechanism.
Materials 13 04492 g002
Materials 13 04492 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Formation of nonprotected indoles 9.
Scheme 2. Formation of nonprotected indoles 9.
Materials 13 04492 sch002
Table
Table 1. Evaluation of the reaction conditions.
Table 1. Evaluation of the reaction conditions.
Materials 13 04492 i001
Entry 1R 1-S-R 28Yield (%) 2
12a8a72
23a8a83
348a72
458a55
568a53
678b95
Materials 13 04492 i002
1 Reaction conditions: 1a (1 mmol), TMEDA (1 mmol), BuLi (1 mmol), 0 °C, THF, 5 min. Then, 2–7 (1 mmol) was added, rt, 15 min. 2 Isolated yields.
Table
Table 2. Reaction of indoles 1 with phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivatives 2.
Table 2. Reaction of indoles 1 with phosphorodithioate disulfanyl derivatives 2.
Materials 13 04492 i003
Entry 1R 1R 28Yield (%) 2
1H– 1aCH3(CH2)11–8a72
2 C6H5–8b94
3 CH2=CH(CH2)9–8c78
4 CH3(CH2)9–8d78
5 4–CH3–C6H4–8e86
6 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8f75
7 HO(CH2)11–8g67
8 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8h65
9 C6H5CH2–8i87
10CH3O– 1bCH2=CH(CH2)9–8j71
11 CH3(CH2)9–8k81
12 4–CH3–C6H4–8l86
13 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8m72
14 HO(CH2)11–8n78
15 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8o72
16 C6H5CH2–8p82
17Br– 1cCH2=CH(CH2)9–8r69
18 CH3(CH2)9–8s84
19 4–CH3–C6H4–8t91
20 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8u79
21 HO(CH2)11–8w76
22 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8x69
23 C6H5CH2–8y85
24BocNH– 1dCH2=CH(CH2)9–8z65
25 CH3(CH2)9–8aa68
26 4–CH3–C6H4–8ab72
27 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8ac65
28 HO(CH2)11–8ad71
29 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8ae66
30 C6H5CH2–8af78
1 Reaction conditions: 1 (1 mmol), TMEDA (1 mmol), BuLi (1 mmol or 2 mmol for 1d), 0 °C, THF, 5 min. Then, 2 (1 mmol) was added, rt, 15 min. 2 Isolated yields.
Table
Table 3. Reaction of indoles 1 with thiotosylates 3.
Table 3. Reaction of indoles 1 with thiotosylates 3.
Materials 13 04492 i004
Entry 1R 1R 28Yield (%) 2
1H– 1aCH3(CH2)11–8a83
2 C6H5–8b92
3 CH2=CH(CH2)9–8c81
4 CH3(CH2)9–8d82
5 4–CH3–C6H4–8e82
6 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8f69
7 HO(CH2)11–8g68
8 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8h69
9 C6H5CH2–8i85
10CH3O– 1bCH2=CH(CH2)9–8j78
11 CH3(CH2)9–8k81
12 4–CH3–C6H4–8l82
13 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8m67
14 HO(CH2)11–8n76
15 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8o68
16 C6H5CH2–8p82
17Br– 1cCH2=CH(CH2)9–8r74
18 CH3(CH2)9–8s83
19 4–CH3–C6H4–8t86
20 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8u78
21 HO(CH2)11–8w76
22 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8x68
23 C6H5CH2–8y84
24BocNH– 1dCH2=CH(CH2)9–8z70
25 CH3(CH2)9–8aa79
26 4–CH3–C6H4–8ab71
27 CH3OOC(CH2)10–8ac62
28 HO(CH2)11–8ad69
29 4–CN–C6H4–CH2–8ae63
30 C6H5CH2–8af78
1 Reaction conditions: 1 (1 mmol), TMEDA (1 mmol), BuLi (1 mmol or 2 mmol for 1d), 0 °C, THF, 5 min. Then, 3 (1 mmol) was added, rt, 15 min. 2 Isolated yields.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Doroszuk, J.; Musiejuk, M.; Jędrzejewski, B.; Walczak, J.; Witt, D. Convenient and Efficient Synthesis of Functionalized 2-Sulfenylindoles. Materials 2020, 13, 4492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204492

AMA Style

Doroszuk J, Musiejuk M, Jędrzejewski B, Walczak J, Witt D. Convenient and Efficient Synthesis of Functionalized 2-Sulfenylindoles. Materials. 2020; 13(20):4492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204492

Chicago/Turabian Style

Doroszuk, Justyna, Mateusz Musiejuk, Bartosz Jędrzejewski, Juliusz Walczak, and Dariusz Witt. 2020. "Convenient and Efficient Synthesis of Functionalized 2-Sulfenylindoles" Materials 13, no. 20: 4492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204492

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop