Next Article in Journal
Biobased Composites from Biobased-Polyethylene and Barley Thermomechanical Fibers: Micromechanics of Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
How Reproducible are Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopic Data for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells?
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Silver Nanoparticle Synthesis by Escherichia Coli Transformed with Candida Albicans Metallothionein Gene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comment on “Dual-Band Perfect Metamaterial Absorber Based on an Asymmetric H-Shaped Structure for Terahertz Waves [Materials] (2018) [2193; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112193]”
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 24
10.3390/ma12244181
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

There Is a Future for N-Heterocyclic Carbene Iron(II) Dyes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Improving Performance through Changes in the Electrolyte

by
Mariia Karpacheva
,
Vanessa Wyss
,
Catherine E. Housecroft
and
Edwin C. Constable
*
Department of Chemistry, University of Basel, BPR 1096, Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(24), 4181; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244181
Submission received: 18 November 2019 / Revised: 6 December 2019 / Accepted: 10 December 2019 / Published: 12 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials for Photonics and Photovoltaics Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
By systematic tuning of the components of the electrolyte, the performances of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) with an N-heterocyclic carbene iron(II) dye have been significantly improved. The beneficial effects of an increased Li+ ion concentration in the electrolyte lead to photoconversion efficiencies (PCEs) up to 0.66% for fully masked cells (representing 11.8% relative to 100% set for N719) and an external quantum efficiency maximum (EQEmax) up to approximately 25% due to an increased short-circuit current density (JSC). A study of the effects of varying the length of the alkyl chain in 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ionic liquids (ILs) shows that a longer chain results in an increase in JSC with an overall efficiency up to 0.61% (10.9% relative to N719 set at 100%) on going from n-methyl to n-butyl chain, although an n-hexyl chain leads to no further gain in PCE. The results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) support the trends in JSC and open-circuit voltage (VOC) parameters. A change in the counterion from I− to [BF4]− for 1-propyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ionic liquid leads to DSCs with a remarkably high JSC value for an N-heterocyclic carbene iron(II) dye of 4.90 mA cm−2, but a low VOC of 244 mV. Our investigations have shown that an increased concentration of Li+ in combination with an optimized alkyl chain length in the 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide IL in the electrolyte leads to iron(II)-sensitized DSC performances comparable with those of containing some copper(I)-based dyes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over the past several decades, solar cells have evolved as a key technology in the field of renewable energy [1]. Solar cells convert solar into electrical energy. Today, most of the commercially available solar cells are made of crystalline silicon (c-Si) [2]. However, their tedious and costly fabrication or the necessity of using environmentally non-benign metals such as gallium or cadmium as alternative semiconductors are major drawbacks for their use as a green and sustainable energy source [3]. Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) represent an alternative to overcome these limitations [4]. Lower material costs and less sophisticated manufacturing processes combined with the avoidance of toxic materials offer considerable advantages [5], and the upscaling from a research laboratory to commercial DSCs makes their introduction to the market viable [5,6,7].
DSCs consist of a photoanode, an electrolyte containing a redox shuttle, and a photocathode (Figure 1a). Photoexcitation of the dye (S→S*) results in electron injection into the conduction band (CB) of the semiconductor, which is typically mesoporous TiO2 in an n-type DSC. The electron travels through the electrical load and, at the platinum-coated counter electrode, it reduces a redox couple, typically consisting of iodide/triiodide (I−/I3−). The reduced form of the redox couple regenerates the dye in the ground state, which completes the circuit [8].
Since every part of the cell contributes to the overall performance of a DSC, optimization of semiconductors [9,10,11,12,13], sensitizers [14,15,16,17,18,19,20], counter electrodes [21,22,23], and electrolytes [16,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] are all critical. The most widely used sensitizers with photoconversion efficiencies (PCE) of up to 11% are ruthenium-oligopyridine complexes [16,33,34,35]. Upon absorption of light, these dyes can provide an efficient metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) with a long lifetime and a low-energy excited state. This results in efficient electron injection into the semiconductor.
However, the use of metals with low natural abundancies significantly increases the cost and sustainability of DSCs [36]. This motivates us and others to explore the use of Earth abundant and cheap metals such as copper [37,38,39,40] and iron [41,42]. In 1998, the first DCSs based on a tris(2,2′-bipyridine)iron(II) complex were reported with a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 290 μA cm−2 [43]. The use of iron(II) complexes for DSC applications is challenging due to their fast deactivation from a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) to metal-centred (MC) state [41], which results in inefficient electron injection and low JSC values. In 2013, Wärnmark and co-workers [44] published the first iron(II) N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complex, 1, (Figure 1b) with an extended 3MLCT lifetime of 9 ps. Following from this, Gros and co-workers [45] fabricated the first series of iron-sensitized DSCs with the best efficiency (0.13%) known at that time. Currently, the PCEs of DSCs sensitized with copper(I) or iron(II) dyes are considerably lower than those with ruthenium(II) or metal-free dyes. Nevertheless, the benefits of using Earth abundant metals provides an impetus to optimizing their performances to facilitate the development of sustainable materials chemistry.
Complex 2 (Figure 1b) is currently the most promising NHC iron-based dye [42,46]. This is despite the fact that 2 is a homoleptic NHC complex, which most likely cannot provide efficient electron injection into the semiconductor because of its fundamental electronic structure and excited state properties [46]. However, tuning of electrolyte composition can also remarkably enhance the PCE and, as shown for other dyes [31], has the potential to make iron-sensitizers a promising alternative to ruthenium-based compounds. It has been demonstrated that both the redox couple and the components of the electrolyte have a critical influence on the PCE, and this effect originates from its role as a charge transfer medium [32,47]. In this investigation, we focus on the electrolyte composition with an I−/I3− redox shuttle. A conventional liquid electrolyte consists of a redox couple, a solvent, and additives. The term ‘additives’ is used to encompass species such as ionic liquids (ILs), lithium salts (LiX), and various Lewis bases. The redox couple is one of the key constituents of a DSC and it ensures effective dye regeneration. The oxidized form of the redox couple must subsequently diffuse to the counter electrode for reduction [48]. The solvent must allow a fast diffusion of both components of the redox couple, has to solubilize charged species, and should have a low vapour pressure for the long-term stability of cells. It has been shown by Han et al. [49] that the donor abilities of solvents scale with good performances of DSCs by enhancing the open circuit voltage (VOC). Additives are mainly used to tune the semiconductor conduction band energy [50] for suppressing the rate of recombination of injected electrons from the semiconductor with the electrolyte. The most common additives used in electrolytes are based on guanidine or nitrogen-containing heterocycles, which can move the CB of a semiconductor towards negative potentials. This leads to a significant increase in VOC [50,51,52]. The presence of Li+ ions also influences the CB due to their adsorption on the surface. However, this effect moves the CB toward more positive potentials, leading to efficient electron injection into the semiconductor but also resulting in a decrease in VOC [53]. It is generally recognized that addition of Li+ ions improves the photocurrent with ruthenium dyes [31], but, at the same time, it has been shown that, for copper(I)-based DSCs, the presence of LiI is not beneficial [54]. Other common additives to electrolytes are ionic liquids, which could, potentially, substitute for the organic solvent. Advantages of ILs are their thermal stability, high boiling point, and ionic conductivity, which contribute to long DSC lifetimes. On the other hand, high viscosities or the fact that some ILs are solid at 298 K, are disadvantages. IL-based and solvent-free electrolytes have been thoroughly studied by many research groups. The work of Grätzel and co-workers [55] demonstrates that high performing solar cells can be achieved with pure IL electrolytes. In 2008, they reported [56] promising device lifetimes indicating the future potential of ILs. The current challenge of using ILs as electrolyte media is their high viscosity, which results in less effective mass transport. The addition of a co-solvent helps to overcome these limitations and allows the use of ILs with high melting points. The most commonly employed ILs in electrolytes are imidazolium salts, such as those shown in Figure 2. ILs with an iodide counterion in combination with iodine lead to polyiodide structures. In 2015, it was reported that C–H···I–I–I and π···I–I-interactions between these polyiodide anions and imidazolium cations cause a weakening of the I–I bonds resulting in a higher conductivity of ILs [57]. This effect can greatly contribute to the performance of the I−/I3− redox shuttle and result in more efficient performance of a DSC.
We have been focusing our attention on the effects of using different additives in electrolytes combined with NHC iron-based dyes in DSCs [58]. Recently, we reported that the PCE of DSCs sensitized by compound 2 could be increased from the 0.13% reported by Gros [46] to values in the range of 0.47% to 0.57% by using an I−/I3−-based electrolyte with 3-methoxypropanenitrile (MPN) as solvent and with the IL 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide as the only additive [58]. The enhancement in performance was largely associated with significantly increased values of JSC ranging from 2.31 to 2.78 mA cm−2 [58]. These preliminary investigations motivated us to undertake more detailed investigations of the effects of changing the electrolyte composition while retaining an I−/I3− redox shuttle and dye 2. Herein, we report electrolyte systems for iron(II) NHC sensitized DSCs, which lead to improved performance and we present the effects of varying the lithium salts and ionic liquid additives. Optimization of electrolyte compositions for metal-free (organic) and ruthenium(II) dyes [16,31,32] and bis(diimine)copper(I) dyes [22,40,54,59] has been a critical part of improving the PCEs of DSCs containing these different types of dyes.

2. Materials and Methods

All experimental data including DSC fabrication and electrolyte preparation are given in the Supporting Information. All DSCs contain 3-methoxypropanenitrile as the solvent in electrolytes. Sets of multiple DSCs (all fully masked) were made for each different electrolyte and all data are presented in the Supporting Information. Data presented in tables in the manuscript are representative of the complete data sets and the trends described are consistent for all the multiple sets. The equivalent circuit model used for fitting electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) experiments is given in Supporting Information (Figure S1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of Lithium Salts on the Performance of the Fe(II)-NHC DSCs

As discussed above, lithium ions, typically introduced as the salt LiI, are commonly used as an additive in electrolytes in DSCs because they enhance electron injection into the semiconductor [31,53]. The I− counterion may also modify the potential of the I−/I3− redox shuttle. When a current is flowing, the iodide and triiodide concentrations deviate from equilibrium, resulting in a potential shift, according to the Nernst equation [60]. We, therefore, decided to investigate the effects of incorporating LiI or LiPF6 additives and have screened a number of electrolytes, the compositions of which are given in Table 1.
Our starting point was an electrolyte composition consisting of LiI (0.1 M), I2 (0.05 M), and one of the ionic liquids (0.6 M) 1-propyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (PMII) or 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (BMII). Electrolytes PMIIa and PMIIb, as well as electrolytes BMIIa and BMIIb, differ only in the Li+ salt (LiI or LiPF6, respectively, Table 1). Interestingly, the trend in the JSC values is different for PMII and BMII ILs (Table 2 and Table S2). In the case of PMII, we observe an increase in JSC from 2.34 to 2.71 mA cm−2 on going from PMIIa to PMIIb, but, for BMII, the JSC values decrease from 2.42 mA cm−2 for BMIIa to 1.77 mA cm−2 for BMIIb. This trend is confirmed with multiple cells (Figure 3). For both ILs, the change from LiI to LiPF6 results in lower VOC, ff, and overall PCE. An increase in the concentrations of LiI and LiPF6 changes the performance for DSCs with both PMII and BMII ILs. A 0.18 M concentration of Li+ ions leads to an increase in JSC and PCE compared to a 0.1 M concentration (Figure 4). Electrolytes PMIIc and PMIId both contain 0.18 M Li+ but differ in the counterion (Table 1). An enhanced VOC of 315 mV and a lower JSC of 3.01 mA cm−2 for DSCs with PMIIc compared to 281 mV of VOC and 3.91 mA cm−2 of JSC for PMIId result in similar PCE values of 0.59% (10.5% relative to 100% set for N719) for DSCs containing both these electrolytes. We use a relative efficiency because this allows comparisons of data, for example when recorded on different solar simulators or within different laboratories [61]. However, a different trend is observed for BMIIc and BMIId, both of which contain 0.18 M Li+ but a different counterion (Table 2). DSCs with BMIIc perform slightly better with PCE of 0.61%, than those with BMIId with PCE of 0.58%. A further increase of LiI concentration from 0.18 M to 0.26 M for DSCs with the BMII based electrolyte is followed by a loss in JSC from 3.40 to 3.02 mA cm−2 but no change in VOC (Table 2, Figure 4, and Figure S2 in Supporting Information). This leads to a value of PCE = 0.56% for the DSC with a BMIIe electrolyte. The change to 0.34 M LiI for BMIIf results in an increase in PCE to 0.64% with JSC of 3.45 mA cm−2 and VOC of 307 mV. The trends in the J–V curves for DSCs with electrolytes BMIIc-f are significant because, typically, it is observed that an improvement in either JSC or VOC is offset by a decrease in VOC or JSC, respectively.
It is important to note that, in the case of ILs with an iodide counterion, both this and LiI contribute I− to the redox couple. In an investigation that focuses on the influence of Li+ ions, it is critical that the concentration of I− is constant. The initial electrolyte BMIIa contains LiI (0.1 M) and BMII (0.6 M) with a total iodide concentration of 0.7 M. With an increase of LiI in the electrolyte, the total I− concentration increases as well. To keep it constant, we decreased the amount of IL present in the electrolyte. On going from electrolyte BMIIa (LiI 0.1 M, BMII 0.6 M) to BMIIg (LiI 0.18 M, BMII 0.52 M), BMIIh (LiI 0.26 M, BMII 0.44 M) and BMIIi (LiI 0.34 M, BMII 0.36 M), JSC values are enhanced in the range of 2.42–3.61 mA cm−2. This rise leads to a better PCE up to 0.63%, despite the loss in VOC from 374 to 301 mV for BMIIh. A further increase in LiI and decrease in BMII IL concentration leads to the loss of PCE due to the low VOC values of 264 mV. A similar trend is observed for PMIIa and PMIIe electrolytes. The improved JSC of 2.80 mA cm−2 for PMIIe compared to 2.34 mA cm−2 for PMIIa leads to a higher PCE of 0.64%. For the electrolytes with 1-propyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium iodide IL, a higher concentration of LiI is beneficial. The change from PDMIIa to PDMIIb results in a small decrease of JSC from 3.27 to 3.21 mA cm−2, of VOC from 348 to 337 mV and of PCE from 0.66% to 0.62%, respectively (Figure 5 and Figure S3 in Supporting Information). It is significant to note that a PCE of 0.66% corresponds to a relative efficiency of 11.8% with respect to N719 set at 100% [61], which is the highest yet observed value for an iron(II)-NHC dye.
DSCs with electrolytes from PMIIa to BMIId listed in Table 2 all exhibit broad external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectra in the range of 430–570 nm (Figures S4 and S5) consistent with previous reports [45,54]. The value of EQEmax does not change on going from PMIIa to PMIIb and is ≈17–20% at λmax 470–500 nm for a set of four DSCs for each electrolyte. DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa and BMIIb have similar EQE spectra with values of EQEmax in the range 12–18% (Figure 6). With an increased concentration of Li+ salts, the EQEmax increased to 21–23% at λmax = 470 nm for PMII c and up to 20%–27% at λmax = 550 nm for PMIId. For BMII-based electrolytes, higher Li+ concentrations also result in higher EQEmax values of approximately 24% for BMIIc and of approximately 20% for BMIId at λmax = 470 nm. The increase of LiI concentration from 0.26 to 0.34 M in the electrolytes positively affects the EQEmax. The EQEmax for BMIIe is about 22% and for BMIIf is about 24–25% at λmax 490–510 nm (Figure 7). The EQE spectra of electrolytes BMIIg, BMIIh, and BMIIi can illustrate the influence of Li+ ions from 0.18 M to 0.34 M due to the constant concentration of I−. On going from BMIIg to BMIIi, the EQEmax increases from about 23% to about 25% at λmax 480–500 nm (Figure 8 and Figure S6).
For a deeper understanding of the influence of LiI on the Fe-NHC-sensitized DSC systems, EIS measurements were performed (Table 3, Figure 9 and Figure S12). The series resistance (Rs), and the resistance (RPt) and capacitance (CPt) of the counter electrodes stay constant for all the DSCs. The recombination resistance (Rrec) and the chemical capacitance (Cμ) decrease with an increase of the Li+ ion concentration in the electrolyte up to 0.26 M. For 0.34 M LiI in electrolyte BMIIf, the values of Rrec and Cμ increase again. The transport resistance (Rtr) has a corresponding trend with an increase from 9 to 69 Ω from 0.1 M LiI to 0.26 M LiI, but then a decrease in Rtr to 26 Ω for 0.34 M LiI.
The diffusion length (Ld), transport time (τt), and electron lifetime (τ) play an important role in the DSC system. For the effective electron collection throughout the semiconductor, Ld has to be around three times longer than the thickness of TiO2 [62], while τt has to be lower than τ. According to reported EIS measurements, high Li+ concentrations in the electrolyte can significantly increase Ld in the case of DSCs with the ruthenium(II)-based Z907 dye [53]. However, for the iron(II)-NHC dye 2, we observed the opposite trend. In the series 0.1 M to 0.18 M to 0.26 M LiI in the presence of 0.6 M of BMII (electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIc, BMIIe, respectively, see Table 1 and Figures S7–S9), Ld values decrease from 56 to 18 μm. At the same time, with the reduction of Ld, τ decreases from 74 to 39 ms, while τt increases from 3 to 18 ms for electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIc, and BMIIe. The Bode plot shows the same trend in τ values, since the charge lifetime is inversely correlated to the maximum frequency fmax (Figure S13) [63]. Electrolyte BMIIf is an exception from this trend (Table 3, Figure S10) with the increase in LiI concentration from 0.26 to 0.34 M leading to higher values of Ld and τ, and to a reduction of τt.
In the case of DSCs containing electrolytes, BMIIh and BMIIi with a constant 0.7 M iodide ion concentration, the EIS data are consistent with JSC and VOC trends. Comparing DSCs with electrolytes BMIIe and BMIIh (see Table 1), the decrease in the concentration of the IL from 0.60 to 0.44 M leads to a higher JSC, which is manifested in lower Rrec and Rtr. The further increase in the concentration of LiI to 0.34 M and a corresponding decrease of the BMII concentration to 0.36 M (to maintain a constant [I−]) in the BMIIi electrolyte leads to lower Rrec and Cμ values, but higher Rtr compared to values observed when the electrolyte is BMIIh (Table 3).
The above results demonstrate that an increase in the concentration of Li+ ions positively affects the PCE for all ILs. The J–V and EIS data for DSCs containing electrolytes BMIIc and BMIIf are very similar with a slightly higher PCE when BMIIf is used. Based on these results, we were motivated to extend the investigations using 0.18 M LiI as the optimal additive.

3.2. Influence of the Structure of the Ionic Liquid

The structure of the IL in the electrolyte can be crucial in terms of DSC performance. The change in an alkyl chain length of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide family results in different viscosity, conductivity, and diffusion properties [64]. We chose five ILs based on methylimidazolium iodide with different alkyl chain lengths 1,3-dimethylimidazolium iodide, 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide, 1-propyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide, and 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (Figure 2).
Table 4 and Table S2 (see Supporting Information) give the measured parameters for DSCs containing electrolytes incorporating the different ILs. In each case, the electrolyte composition was LiI (0.18 M), I2 (0.05 M), and IL (0.6 M) in MPN. We observed an increase in PCE as the alkyl chain lengthened. From DMII to BMIIc, an increase in JSC from 2.31 to 3.40 mA cm−2 is observed, but this is countered by a loss in VOC from 362 to 301 mV (Table 4 and Figure 10). The higher JSC values result in a PCE of 0.61% (which represents a noteworthy value of 10.9% relative to 100% set for N719 [61]) for BMIIc despite the reduction in VOC compared to DMII. DSCs with electrolyte HMII appear out of line with the trend observed for the shorter alkyl chains (Table 4 and Figure 9). A decrease in JSC to 3.14 mA cm−2 is compensated by a slightly higher VOC of 316 mV and leads to a similar overall performance (PCE = 0.60%) as for BMIIc.
The results of EIS experiments (Table 5, Figure 11, and Figures S15–S18) are consistent with the observed trends in DSC performances. On going from the methyl to n-propyl substituent, we observe a decrease in both the recombination resistance and the chemical capacitance. On going from the electrolyte with DMII to EMII, there is a slightly higher Cμ combined with a smaller transport resistance. This explains the small difference in VOC and JSC values for these DSC sets and results in a similar overall performance. The Cμ values for PMIIc and BMIIc are comparable, but higher Rrec in combination with smaller Rtr for BMIIc lead to a more favourable electron injection in the semiconductor. This effect results in a higher JSC value and, as a consequence, in a better DSC efficiency in the case of the BMII electrolyte. The change from n-butyl to n-hexyl chain does not lead to any significant difference in Rrec and Cμ, and, therefore, results in similar PCE values. The values of Ld, τt, and τ, in the case of the DSCs in Table 4, are consistent with each other. The trend in τ is confirmed with the Bode plot (Figure S19). Low values of τt and Rtr for DSCs with the BMII electrolyte represent a small electron loss in the TiO2 semiconductor. Together, these parameters result in well-performing DSCs.
The EQE spectra of the DSCs listed in Table 4 cover a broad range of wavelengths (Figure S20). The change from methyl to n-butyl chain enhances the EQEmax up to 24% (λmax = 430 to 570 nm) and this is consistent with the trend in JSC. The use of the HMII-based electrolyte leads to the same EQEmax value (≈20%) as observed for DSCs with EMII (Figure 12). Thus, we conclude that, of the imidazolium iodides screened, incorporation of an n-butyl side-chain contributes to the best efficiency DSCs with optimal values of VOC, JSC, EQEmax, and EIS parameters.

3.3. Influence of Ionic Liquid Counterions

The iodide counterion contributes to a faster dye regeneration due to the increased concentration of I− in the system [65]. On the other hand, too high a concentration of imidazolium iodide leads to a loss of the potential photocurrent [65]. This drawback motivated us to investigate the effect of different counterions in the ILs in the electrolytes. We have focused on 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium salts with tetrafluoridoborate, hexafluoridophosphate, and trifluoromethanesulfonate counterions and 1-propyl-3-methylimidazolium salts with tetrafluoridoborate, bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, and iodide counterions (Figure 2). The performances of DSCs containing the different electrolytes are summarized in Figure 13 and Table 6, and in Table S5 and Figure S21 in the Supporting Information. In the sequence of [BDMI]+ salts, values of JSC fall from 3.80 to 2.22 mA cm−2, while VOC increases from 266 to 385 mV. In the [PMI]+ series, the same trend is observed. For PMIBF, PMINCFSO, and PMIIc, the decrease in JSC values is compensated by an increase in VOC, which results in a PCE for the DSCs in the range of 0.35% to 0.59%. A PCE of 0.59% translates to a relative efficiency of 10.5% with respect to N719 set at 100%, which is rather high for an iron-based sensitizer. The change from [PF6]− to [CF3SO3]− for [BDMI]+ has little effect on the overall DSC performances (0.57% and 0.56%), while on going from [N(CF3SO2)2]− to I− for [PMI]+ (i.e., PMINCFSO to PMIIc, Table 6) there is a moderate gain in performance from 10.0% to 10.5% relative to N719 [61], as a consequence of values of JSC = 3.01 mA cm−2 and VOC = 315 mA. In the case of the [BF4]− counterion for both BDMIBF and PMIBF, the low ff values of 41% and 30% in combination with low VOC values of 266 and 264 mV result in PCE values of 0.41% and 0.35%, respectively (Table 6). This suggests that use of [BF4]− containing ILs is not beneficial. When the counterion is changed to [PF6]−, the ff increases and the overall performance of the cells improves.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we report the enhanced performances of DSCs containing the homoleptic iron(II) sensitizer 2 and I−/I3− redox shuttle by variation in the composition of the electrolyte. An increased concentration of Li+ positively affects the overall DSC performance and the EQEmax. Values of JSC = 3.61 mA cm−2 and EQEmax ≈ 25% are observed for electrolyte BMIIi, which contains 0.34 M LiI and 0.36 M BMII in 3-methoxypropanenitrile. The combination of 0.60 M PDMII IL and 0.18 M LiI lead to a PCE up to 0.66%, which is 11.8% relative to 100% set for N719. Currently, this is the highest observed overall efficiency for an iron(II)-NHC sensitizer. All DSCs in this investigation were fully masked to prevent overestimations of PCEs.
An investigation of the effects of varying the alkyl chain length of 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ILs has shown that longer alkyl chains result in an increase in JSC from 2.31 to 3.40 mA cm−2 and PCE from 0.53% to 0.61% on going from n-methyl to n-butyl chains. A further lengthening to an n-hexyl chain results in a similar PCE value of 0.60% (10.7% relative to N719 set at 100%) with slightly lower JSC of 3.14 mA cm−2 compared to 3.40 mA cm−2 for BMII IL. The EQEmax also increases in the order DMII > EMII > PMII > BMII from ≈17% to ≈24%. The use of HMII IL reverses the trend with a lower EQEmax of ≈20%. Rtr values extracted from EIS measurements confirm the trend in JSC and EQEmax.
A change of the counterion in the IL from I− did not lead to any increase in performance of the DSC. Use of the [BF4]− counterion leads to DSCs with the poorest performances. Despite a high JSC of 3.80 and 4.90 mA cm−2 for BDMIBF and PMIBF, ff values of 41 and 30% in combination with VOC values of 266 and 244 mV result in low PCE values of 0.41 and 0.35%, respectively. Use of other counterions [PF6]− and [CF3SO3]− for [BDMI]+ IL and [N(CF3SO3)2]− for [PMI]+ leads to DSCs that perform similarly with PCEs of 0.56–0.57% (10.0–10.2% relative to 100% for N719).
In conclusion, we have shown that tuning of electrolyte additives has a significant impact on iron(II)-sensitized DSCs, leading to performances that approach those of cells sensitized with copper(I)-based dyes [37]. The overall performances as well as the EQE spectra significantly increase with an increase in the concentration of Li+ ions in combination with an optimized length of the alkyl-side chain in 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide ILs and use of iodide as the counterion. For further improvement of the performances of iron(II)-based DSCs, it is imperative that dye, a redox shuttle, and electrolyte components are optimized.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/24/4181/s1. Full experimental details. Figure S1: Equivalent circuit model used for fitting EIS data. Figures S2–S3: J–V curves for multiple DSCs. Figures S4–S6: EQE spectra for multiple DSCs. Figures S7–S13: EIS data and Bode plots for multiple DSCs. Figure S14: J–V curves for multiple DSCs. Figures S15–S19: EIS data and Bode plots for multiple DSCs. Figure S20: EQE spectra for multiple DSCs. Figure S21: J–V curves for multiple DSCs. Table S1: Parameters for multiple DSCs using electrolytes with different concentrations of Li+ salts and ILs. Table S2: EIS parameters for multiple DSCs using electrolytes with different concentrations of LiI. Table S3: DSC parameters for multiple cells with different ILs. Table S4: EIS parameters for multiple cells with different ILs. Table S5: DSC parameters for multiple cells.

Author Contributions

Investigation and data analysis (M.K. and V.W.). Manuscript writing (M.K.). Manuscript editing (C.E.H. and E.C.C.). Project supervision and funding acquisition (C.E.H. and E.C.C.).

Funding

The Swiss National Science Foundation (grant number 200020_182000) partly funded this research.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from the University of Basel.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.; Wang, Z.M. (Eds.) High-Efficiency Solar Cells. Physics, Materials, and Devices; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Battaglia, C.; Cuevas, A.; De Wolf, S. High-efficiency Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells: Status and Perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1552–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Luceño-Sánchez, J.A.; Díez-Pascual, A.M.; Peña Capilla, R. Materials for Photovoltaics: State of Art and Recent Developments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kalyanasundaram, K. Dye Sensitized Solar Cells; EPFL Press: Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010; ISBN 9780429156359. [Google Scholar]
  5. Parisi, M.L.; Maranghi, S.; Basosi, R. The Evolution of the Dye Sensitized Solar Cells from Grätzel Prototype to Up-scaled Solar Applications: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 124–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, S.S. Dye-sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Current Status. Nanoscale. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. GCell. Smart. Sustainable, Solar. Available online: https://gcell.com/dye-sensitized-solar-cells/advantages-of-dscc/flexible-solar-cells (accessed on 26 July 2019).
  8. Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.Z.; Wu, R.J.; Lin, L.Y.; Chang, W.C. Novel synthesis of popcorn-like TiO2 light scatterers using a facile solution method for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sources 2019, 413, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, M.; Wen, X.; Wang, M.; Iocozzia, J.; Zhang, N.; Lin, C.; Lin, Z. Recent Advances in Dye-sensitized Solar Cells: From Photoanodes, Sensitizers and Electrolytes to Counter Electrodes. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yan, W.; Huo, M.M.; Hu, R.; Wang, Y. Working Area Effects on the Energetic Distribution of Trap States and Charge Dynamics of Dye-sensitized Solar Cells. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 1734–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jennings, J.R.; Liu, Y.; Safari-Alamuti, F.; Wang, Q. Dependence of Dye-sensitized Solar Cell Impedance on Photoelectrode Thickness. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 1556–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, T.; Wang, C.; Ge, Z.; Liu, J.; Hao, X.; Du, N.; Xiao, H. Preparation and Photovoltaic Properties of Dye-sensitized Solar Cells Based on Zinc Titanium Mixed Metal Oxides. Colloid. Surf. A 2019, 568, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calogero, G.; Citro, I.; Crupi, C.; Carini, G.; Arigò, D.; Spinella, G.; Bartolotta, A.; Di Marco, G. Absorption Spectra, Thermal Analysis, Photoelectrochemical Characterization and Stability Test of Vegetable-based Dye-sensitized Solar Cells. Opt. Mater. 2019, 88, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Freitag, M.; Teuscher, J.; Saygili, Y.; Zhang, X.; Giordano, F.; Liska, P.; Hua, J.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Moser, J.E.; Grätzel, M.; et al. Dye-sensitized Solar Cells for Efficient Power Generation under Ambient Lighting. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aghazada, S.; Nazeeruddin, M.K. Ruthenium Complexes as Sensitizers in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Inorganics 2018, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mishra, A.; Fischer, M.K.; Bäuerle, P. Metal-Free Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: From Structure: Property Relationships to Design Rules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2474–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, L.; Cole, J.M. Anchoring Groups for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2015, 7, 3427–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cole, J.M.; Pepe, G.; Al Bahri, O.K.; Cooper, C.B. Cosensitization in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7279–7327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Liu, K.; Ma, L.; Zhan, X. Triarylamine: Versatile Platform for Organic, Dye-Sensitized, and Perovskite Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14675–14725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sarkar, A.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Bera, S. NiS/rGO Nanohybrid: An Excellent Counter Electrode for Dye Sensitized Solar Cell. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2018, 182, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, J.B.; Hao, Y.; Yang, L.; Mohammadi, H.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Sun, L.C.; Hagfeldt, A.; Sheibani, E. Electrochemically Polymerized Poly (3, 4-phenylenedioxythiophene) as Efficient and Transparent Counter Electrode for Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 300, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yun, S.; Hagfeldt, A. (Eds.) Counter Electrodes for Dye-Sensitized and Perovskite Solar Cells; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2018; Volume 1–2, ISBN 978-3-527-41367-6. [Google Scholar]
  24. Boschloo, G. Improving the Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, P.; Yang, L.; Wu, H.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, N.; Chen, S.; Decoppet, J.D.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Stable and Efficient Organic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Based on Ionic Liquid Electrolyte. Joule 2018, 2, 2145–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Moser, J.E.; Grätzel, M. A New Ionic Liquid Electrolyte Enhances the Conversion Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 13280–13285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fürer, S.O.; Bozic-Weber, B.; Schefer, T.; Wobill, C.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E.; Willgert, M. Understanding why replacing I3−/I− by cobalt(II)/(III) electrolytes in bis(diimine)copper(I)-based dye-sensitized solar cells improves performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 12995–13004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hao, Y.; Yang, W.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, R.; Mijangos, E.; Saygili, Y.; Hammarström, L.; Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G. A Small Electron Donor in Cobalt Complex Electrolyte Significantly Improves Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, Z.; Liang, M.; Chen, J. Kinetics of Iodine-Free Redox Shuttles in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Interfacial Recombination and Dye Regeneration. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saygili, Y.; Stojanovic, M.; Flores-Diaz, N.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Grätzel, M.; Hagfeldt, A. Metal Coordination Complexes as Redox Mediators in regenerative Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Inorganics 2019, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Wu, J.; Lan, Z.; Lin, J.; Huang, M.; Huang, Y.; Fan, L.; Luo, G. Electrolytes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2136–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Iftikhar, H.; Sonai, G.G.; Hashmi, S.G.; Nogueira, A.F.; Lund, P.D. Progress on Electrolytes Development in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Materials 2019, 12, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kroon, J.M.; Bakker, N.J.; Smit, H.J.P.; Liska, P.; Thampi, K.R.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M.; Hinsch, A.; Hore, S.; et al. Nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells having maximum performance. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2007, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chiba, Y.; Islam, A.; Watanabe, Y.; Komiya, R.; Koide, N.; Han, L. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Conversion Efficiency of 11.1%. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, L638–L640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Péchy, P.; Renouard, T.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Comte, P.; Liska, P.; Cevey, L.; Costa, E.; Shklover, V.; et al. Engineering of Efficient Panchromatic Sensitizers for Nanocrystalline TiO2-Based Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bozic-Weber, B.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Light Harvesting with Earth Abundant d-Block Metals: Development of Sensitizers in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSCs). Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 3089–3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Housecroft, C.E.; Constable, E.C. The Emergence of Copper(I)-Based Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8386–8398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lazorski, M.S.; Castellano, F.N. Advances in the light conversion properties of Cu(I)-based photosensitizers. Polyhedron 2014, 82, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sandroni, M.; Pellegrin, Y.; Odobel, F. Heteroleptic Bis-diimine Copper(I) Complexes for Applications in Solar Energy Conversion. C. R. Chim. 2016, 19, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dragonetti, C.; Magni, M.; Colombo, A.; Fagnani, F.; Roberto, D.; Melchiorre, F.; Biagini, P.; Fantacci, S. Towards Efficient Sustainable Full-copper Dye-sensitized Solar Cells. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 9703–9711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wenger, O.S. Is Iron the New Ruthenium? Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 6043–6052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Duchanois, T.; Liu, L.; Pastore, M.; Monari, A.; Cebrián, C.; Trolez, Y.; Darari, M.; Magra, K.; Francés-Monerris, A.; Domenichini, E.; et al. NHC-Based Iron Sensitizers for DSSCs. Inorganics 2019, 6, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ferrere, S.; Gregg, B.A. Photosensitization of TiO2 by [FeII(2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid)2(CN)2]: Band Selective Electron Injection from Ultra-Short-Lived Excited States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 843–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Y.; Harlang, T.; Canton, S.E.; Chábera, P.; Suárez-Alcántara, K.; Fleckhaus, A.; Vithanage, D.A.; Göransson, E.; Corani, A.; Lomoth, R.; et al. Towards longer-lived metal-to-ligand charge transfer states of iron(II) complexes: An N-heterocyclic carbene approach. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 641–6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Duchanois, T.; Etienne, T.; Cebrián, C.; Liu, L.; Monari, A.; Beley, M.; Assfeld, X.; Haacke, S.; Gros, P.C. An Iron-Based Photosensitizer with Extended Excited-State Lifetime: Photophysical and Photovoltaic Properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2015, 2469–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pastore, M.; Duchanois, T.; Liu, L.; Monari, A.; Assfeld, X.; Haacke, S.; Gros, P.C. Interfacial charge separation and photovoltaic efficiency in Fe(ii)-carbene sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 28069–28081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Hauch, A.; Georg, A. Diffusion in the electrolyte and charge-transfer reaction at the platinum electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 3457–3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hagfeldt, A.; Grätzel, M. Molecular Photovoltaics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Fukui, A.; Komiya, R.; Yamanaka, R.; Islam, A.; Han, L. Effect of a redox electrolyte in mixed solvents on the photovoltaic performance of a dye-sensitized solar cell. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2006, 90, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kusama, H.; Orita, H.; Sugihara, H. TiO2 band shift by nitrogen-containing heterocycles in dye-sensitized solar cells: A periodic density functional theory study. Langmuir 2008, 24, 4411–4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shi, J.; Peng, B.; Pei, J.; Peng, S.; Chen, J. An Inexpensive and Efficient Pyridine-Based Additive for the Electrolyte of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Power Sources 2009, 193, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Z.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; O’Regan, B.C.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Grätzel, M. Influence of 4-Guanidinobutyric Acid as Coadsorbent in Reducing Recombination in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 21818–21824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jennings, J.R.; Wang, Q. Influence of Lithium Ion Concentration on Electron Injection, Transport, and Recombination in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 1715–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fürer, S.O.; Luu, L.Y.N.; Bozic-Weber, B.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Improving performance of copper(I)-based dye sensitized solar cells through I3−/I− electrolyte manipulation. Dyes Pigm. 2016, 132, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Moser, J.E.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Grätzel, M. A Solvent-Free, SeCN–/(SeCN)3− Based Ionic Liquid Electrolyte for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7164–7165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bai, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Li, R.; Wang, P.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. High-performance dye-sensitized solar cells based on solvent-free electrolytes produced from eutectic melts. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 626–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fei, Z.; Bobbink, F.D.; Păunescu, E.; Scopelliti, R.; Dyson, P.J. Influence of Elemental Iodine on Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquids: Solution and Solid-State Effects. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 10504–10512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Karpacheva, M.; Housecroft, C.E.; Constable, E.C. Electrolyte tuning in dye-sensitized solar cells with N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) iron(II) sensitizers. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 3069–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Karpacheva, M.; Malzner, F.J.; Wobill, C.; Büttner, A.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. Cuprophilia: Dye-sensitized solar cells with copper(I) dyes and copper(I)/(II) redox shuttles. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 156, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ferber, J.; Stangl, R.; Luther, J. An Electrical Model for the Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 1998, 53, 29–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Malzner, F.J.; Brauchli, S.Y.; Schönhofer, E.; Constable, E.C.; Housecroft, C.E. To deprotect or not to deprotect: Phosphonate ester versus phosphonic acid anchor ligands in copper(I)-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Polyhedron 2014, 82, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Halme, J.; Vahermaa, P.; Miettunen, K.; Lund, P. Device physics of dye solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, E210–E234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Ho, P.; Bao, L.Q.; Ahn, K.S.; Cheruku, R.; Kim, J.H. P-Type dye-sensitized solar cells: Enhanced performance with a NiO compact blocking layer. Synth. Met. 2016, 217, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Every, H.A.; Bishop, A.G.; MacFarlane, D.R.; Orädd, G.; Forsyth, M. Transport properties in a family of dialkylimidazolium ionic liquids. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 1758–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wang, P.; Wenger, B.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Moser, J.E.; Teuscher, J.; Kantlehner, W.; Mezger, J.; Stoyanov, E.V.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Charge separation and efficient light energy conversion in sensitized mesoscopic solar cells based on binary ionic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6850–6856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 12 04181 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Composition of an n-type DSC. Arrows show the direction of the electrical circuit. VOC = open circuit voltage, which is the maximum potential that the DSC can provide. (b) Structures of the iron (II) NHC complexes 1 and 2.
Figure 1. (a) Composition of an n-type DSC. Arrows show the direction of the electrical circuit. VOC = open circuit voltage, which is the maximum potential that the DSC can provide. (b) Structures of the iron (II) NHC complexes 1 and 2.
Materials 12 04181 g001
Materials 12 04181 g002 550
Figure 2. Structures of ILs used in this investigation.
Figure 2. Structures of ILs used in this investigation.
Materials 12 04181 g002
Materials 12 04181 g003 550
Figure 3. J-V curves for sets of multiple DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa and BMIIb.
Figure 3. J-V curves for sets of multiple DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa and BMIIb.
Materials 12 04181 g003
Materials 12 04181 g004 550
Figure 4. J-V curves for the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIc, BMIIe, and BMIIf. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S2 (see Supporting Information).
Figure 4. J-V curves for the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIc, BMIIe, and BMIIf. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S2 (see Supporting Information).
Materials 12 04181 g004
Materials 12 04181 g005 550
Figure 5. J-V curves for the DSCs with electrolytes PDMIIa and PDMIIb. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S3 (see Supporting Information).
Figure 5. J-V curves for the DSCs with electrolytes PDMIIa and PDMIIb. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S3 (see Supporting Information).
Materials 12 04181 g005
Materials 12 04181 g006 550
Figure 6. EQE spectra for the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIb, BMIIc, and BMIId. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S5 (see Supporting Information).
Figure 6. EQE spectra for the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIb, BMIIc, and BMIId. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S5 (see Supporting Information).
Materials 12 04181 g006
Materials 12 04181 g007 550
Figure 7. EQE spectra for the multiple DSCs with electrolytes BMIIe and BMIIf.
Figure 7. EQE spectra for the multiple DSCs with electrolytes BMIIe and BMIIf.
Materials 12 04181 g007
Materials 12 04181 g008 550
Figure 8. EQE spectra for the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIg, BMIIh, and BMIIi. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S6 (see Supporting Information).
Figure 8. EQE spectra for the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIg, BMIIh, and BMIIi. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S6 (see Supporting Information).
Materials 12 04181 g008
Materials 12 04181 g009 550
Figure 9. Nyquist plots of the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIc, BMIIe, BMIIf, BMIIh, and BMIIi. Data for multiple DSC sets are shown in Figures S7–S12. Solid lines represent fitted curves. Dotted lines represent experimental data. The expansion shows the high frequency region.
Figure 9. Nyquist plots of the DSCs with electrolytes BMIIa, BMIIc, BMIIe, BMIIf, BMIIh, and BMIIi. Data for multiple DSC sets are shown in Figures S7–S12. Solid lines represent fitted curves. Dotted lines represent experimental data. The expansion shows the high frequency region.
Materials 12 04181 g009
Materials 12 04181 g010 550
Figure 10. J-V curves for the DSCs with electrolytes DMII, EMII, PMIIc, BMIIc, and HMII. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S14 (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 10. J-V curves for the DSCs with electrolytes DMII, EMII, PMIIc, BMIIc, and HMII. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S14 (see Supplementary Information).
Materials 12 04181 g010
Materials 12 04181 g011 550
Figure 11. Nyquist plots of the DSCs with electrolytes DMII, EMII, PMIIc, and HMII. Data for multiple DSC sets are shown in Figures S15–S18 (see Supporting Information). Solid lines represent fitted curves and dotted lines represent experimental data. The expansion shows the high frequency region.
Figure 11. Nyquist plots of the DSCs with electrolytes DMII, EMII, PMIIc, and HMII. Data for multiple DSC sets are shown in Figures S15–S18 (see Supporting Information). Solid lines represent fitted curves and dotted lines represent experimental data. The expansion shows the high frequency region.
Materials 12 04181 g011
Materials 12 04181 g012 550
Figure 12. EQE spectra for the DSCs with electrolytes DMII, EMII, PMIIc, BMIIc, and HMII. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S20 (see Supporting Information).
Figure 12. EQE spectra for the DSCs with electrolytes DMII, EMII, PMIIc, BMIIc, and HMII. Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S20 (see Supporting Information).
Materials 12 04181 g012
Materials 12 04181 g013 550
Figure 13. J-V curves for DSCs with electrolytes BDMIBF, BDMIPF, BDMICFSO, PMIBF, PMINCFSO, and PMIIc (see Figure 2 for abbreviations). Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S21 in the Supporting Information.
Figure 13. J-V curves for DSCs with electrolytes BDMIBF, BDMIPF, BDMICFSO, PMIBF, PMINCFSO, and PMIIc (see Figure 2 for abbreviations). Data for multiple DSCs are shown in Figure S21 in the Supporting Information.
Materials 12 04181 g013
Table
Table 1. Electrolyte compositions with different Li+ salts and IL concentrations. The solvent is MPN.
Table 1. Electrolyte compositions with different Li+ salts and IL concentrations. The solvent is MPN.
Electrolyte 1LiI/MLiPF6/MI2/MIL/M
PMIIa0.10–0.05PMII/0.60
PMIIb–0.100.05PMII/0.60
PMIIc0.18–0.05PMII/0.60
PMIId–0.180.05PMII/0.60
BMIIa0.10–0.05BMII/0.60
BMIIb–0.100.05BMII/0.60
BMIIc0.18–0.05BMII/0.60
BMIId–0.180.05BMII/0.60
BMIIe0.26–0.05BMII/0.60
BMIIf0.34–0.05BMII/0.60
BMIIg0.18–0.05BMII/0.52
BMIIh0.26–0.05BMII/0.44
BMIIi0.34–0.05BMII/0.36
PDMIIa0.18–0.05PDMII/0.60
PDMIIb0.18–0.05PDMII/0.52
PMIIe0.18–0.05PMII/0.52
1 IL abbreviations defined in Figure 2.
Table
Table 2. Electrolyte compositions with different Li+ salts and IL concentrations. The solvent is MPN.
Table 2. Electrolyte compositions with different Li+ salts and IL concentrations. The solvent is MPN.
Electrolyte 1JSC/mA cm−2VOC/mVff/%η/%Rel. η/% 2
PMIIa2.34371660.5710.2
PMIIb2.71264570.417.3
PMIIc3.01315620.5910.5
PMIId3.91281530.5910.5
BMIIa2.42374610.559.8
BMIIb1.77359620.396.9
BMIIc3.40301590.6110.9
BMIId3.13315590.5810.4
BMIIe3.02299620.5610.0
BMIIf3.45307600.6411.4
BMIIg3.33298620.6211.1
BMIIh3.46301600.6311.3
BMIIi3.61264620.5910.5
PDMIIa3.27348580.6611.8
PDMIIb3.21337570.6211.1
PMIIe2.80368620.6411.4
Reference cell with dye N71912.53654685.60100
1 The electrolyte compositions are given in Table 1. 2 All DSCs are referenced to an N719 sensitized DSC and relative efficiencies are given with η for N719 set to 100% [61].
Table
Table 3. EIS parameters for DSCs using electrolytes with different concentrations of LiI. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S2 (see Supporting Information).
Table 3. EIS parameters for DSCs using electrolytes with different concentrations of LiI. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S2 (see Supporting Information).
Electrolyte 1Rrec/ΩCμ/μFRtr/Ωτ/msτt/msLd/μmRs/ΩRPt/ΩCPt/μF
BMIIa1923849743561446
BMIIc16930713524431386
BMIIe1502586939181811117
BMIIf1523742657102916115
BMIIh144378235493012125
BMIIi993024030121911106
1 The electrolyte compositions are given in Table 1.
Table
Table 4. Parameters for DSCs using electrolytes based on imidazolium ionic liquids with different lengths of a side chain. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S3 in the Supporting Information section.
Table 4. Parameters for DSCs using electrolytes based on imidazolium ionic liquids with different lengths of a side chain. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S3 in the Supporting Information section.
Electrolyte 1,2JSC/mA cm−2VOC/mVff/%η/%Rel. η/% 3
DMII2.31362630.539.5
EMII2.47344620.529.3
PMIIc3.01315620.5910.5
BMIIc3.40301590.6110.9
HMII3.14316600.6010.7
Reference cell with dye N71912.53654685.60100
1 The electrolyte compositions are LiI (0.18 M), I2 (0.05 M), and IL (0.6 M) in MPN. 2 Data for PMIIc and BMIIc are repeated from Table 2 for convenience. 3 All DSCs are referenced to N719 sensitized DSC. Relative efficiencies are given with N719 PCE set to 100% [61].
Table
Table 5. EIS parameters for DSCs using electrolytes based on imidazolium ionic liquids with different lengths of the side-chain. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S4 (see Supporting Information).
Table 5. EIS parameters for DSCs using electrolytes based on imidazolium ionic liquids with different lengths of the side-chain. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S4 (see Supporting Information).
Electrolyte 1,2Rrec/ΩCμ/μFRtr/Ωτ/msτt/msLd/μmRs/ΩRPt/ΩCPt/μF
DMII269416221129421267
EMII299464191399481365
PMIIc14129719426331285
BMIIc16930713524431386
HMII1793283059102913115
1 The electrolyte compositions are given in the footnote to Table 4. 2 Data for BMIIc are repeated from Table 3 for convenience.
Table
Table 6. Parameters for DSCs using electrolytes based on imidazolium ionic liquids with different counterions. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S5 in the Supporting Information.
Table 6. Parameters for DSCs using electrolytes based on imidazolium ionic liquids with different counterions. Data for multiple DSCs are given in Table S5 in the Supporting Information.
Electrolyte 1,2JSC/mA cm−2VOC/mVff/%η/%Rel. η/% 3
BDMIBF3.80266410.417.3
BDMIPF2.84351580.5710.2
BDMICFSO2.22385660.5610.0
PMIBF4.90244300.356.3
PMINCFSO2.84316620.5610.0
PMII c3.01315620.5910.5
Reference cell with dye N71912.53654685.60100
1 The electrolyte compositions are LiI (0.18 M), I2 (0.05 M), and IL (0.6 M) in MPN. 2 Data for PMIIc and BMIIc are repeated from Table 2 for convenience. 3 All DSCs are referenced to N719 sensitized DSC. Relative efficiencies are given with N719 PCE set to 100% [61].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karpacheva, M.; Wyss, V.; Housecroft, C.E.; Constable, E.C. There Is a Future for N-Heterocyclic Carbene Iron(II) Dyes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Improving Performance through Changes in the Electrolyte. Materials 2019, 12, 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244181

AMA Style

Karpacheva M, Wyss V, Housecroft CE, Constable EC. There Is a Future for N-Heterocyclic Carbene Iron(II) Dyes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Improving Performance through Changes in the Electrolyte. Materials. 2019; 12(24):4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karpacheva, Mariia, Vanessa Wyss, Catherine E. Housecroft, and Edwin C. Constable. 2019. "There Is a Future for N-Heterocyclic Carbene Iron(II) Dyes in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Improving Performance through Changes in the Electrolyte" Materials 12, no. 24: 4181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop