Next Article in Journal
Deposition of Selective Catalytic Reduction Coating on Wire-Mesh Structure by Atmospheric Plasma Spraying
Next Article in Special Issue
Microstructure and Tribological Performance of Mesocarbon Microbead–Silicon Carbide Composites
Previous Article in Journal
On-Chip Miniaturized Bandpass Filter Using GaAs-Based Integrated Passive Device Technology For L-Band Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation about the Effect of Manufacturing Parameters on the Mechanical Behaviour of Natural Fibre Nonwovens Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/ma12183047
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Compounding Conditions of Polyamide 6, Carbon Fiber, and Al2O3 on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of the Composite Polymer

by
Young Shin Kim
1,
Jae Kyung Kim
2 and
Euy Sik Jeon
1,2,*
1
Industrial Technology Research Institute, Kongju National University, Cheonan-daero, Seobuk-gu, Cheonan-si 31080, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Kongju National University, Cheonan-daero, Seobuk-gu, Cheonan-si 31080, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(18), 3047; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183047
Submission received: 17 August 2019 / Revised: 11 September 2019 / Accepted: 17 September 2019 / Published: 19 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanical Behavior of Composite Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Among the composite manufacturing methods, injection molding has higher time efficiency and improved processability. The production of composites via injection molding requires a pre-process to mix and pelletize the matrix polymer and reinforcement material. Herein, we studied the effect of extrusion process conditions for making pellets on the mechanical and thermal properties provided by injection molding. Polyamide 6 (PA6) was used as the base, and composites were produced by blending carbon fibers and Al2O3 as the filler. To determine the optimum blending ratio, the mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and melt flow index (MI) were measured at various blending ratios. With this optimum blending ratio, pellets were produced by changing the temperature and RPM conditions, which are major process variables during compounding. Samples were fabricated by applying the same injection conditions, and the mechanical strength, MI values, and thermal properties were measured. The mechanical strength increased slightly as the temperature and RPM increased, and the MI and thermal conductivity also increased. The results of this study can be used as a basis for specifying the conditions of the mixing and compounding process such that the desired mechanical and thermal properties are obtained.

1. Introduction

Composites refer to materials produced by combining two or more materials to complement the shortcomings of each material while taking advantage of the features of each material [1,2]. Composites have been applied in aerospace applications in the past; since then, they have also been applied in various other industries [3]. The expanding areas across which composites are being applied have encouraged many studies, especially on polymer composites strengthened using polymers, as the matrix in combination with various fibers to enhance their stiffness of the polymers.
Polyamide 6 (PA6) [4], also known as nylon 6, is synthesized by the ring-opening polymerization of caprolactam, which contains six carbon atoms in its cyclic structure. Thus, each repeating unit of the polymer consists of six carbon atoms, hence the name poly(hexano-6-lactam) or simply polyamide 6. Among all amides, PA6 is commercially the most important. Owing to the polarity of the amide group and the strong attraction between chains, PA6 has advantages such as superior toughness, impact strength, tensile strength, abrasion resistance, and chemical resistance [5]. Various fiber fillers have been used to improve the properties of the polymer matrix. As a representative example, carbon fibers (CFs) are attractive engineering materials, primarily because they have a high strength-to-weight ratio. In addition, their stiffness and strength properties with respect to weight (specific stiffness and specific strength, respectively) are superior to those of a range of popular engineering materials including polymers [6,7,8]. Another material that is used to reinforce the polymer matrix is alumina (Al2O3), which is a ceramic material with high thermal conductivity and is used to enhance the low thermal conductivity of the polymer matrix. Alumina can also be applied to improve the heat dissipation performance of home appliances because of its electrical insulation properties [9].
Various engineering methods are employed in the process of manufacturing composites consisting of a polymer matrix and fiber reinforcements. Autoclaving, the method mainly applied in the aerospace field, can be used to manufacture high-quality reproducible parts, including those requiring high fiber volume fractions and low porosity [10]. Even though this method can produce excellent composites, many out-of-autoclave (OoA) processes have been developed to avoid the high manufacturing cost and time-consuming manufacturing process associated with autoclaves [11]. In particular, resin transfer molding (RTM) is increasingly being used to manufacture large-sized structures consisting of composites, such as fuselage frames, turbo-propeller blades, boats, and wind turbine blades [12,13].
Among these composite manufacturing methods, injection molding has lower cost, higher time efficiency, and improved processability. Moreover, injection molding is among the manufacturing methods that can be used to mass-produce polymer composites [14]. Hence, many studies have been conducted on the production of composites using injection molding. Zhang et al. [15] analyzed the relationship between the screw structure and properties of recycled glass fiber-reinforced flame-retardant nylon 46 (RGFFRPA46) in injection molding. Ahmed et al. [16] demonstrated the correlation between extruder configuration and fiber aspect ratio, and hence the overall strength of the composite. Yahui et al. [17] fabricated composites via injection molding according to the variation in the initial length of the CF and analyzed the physical and thermal properties. However, they reported that although the initial fiber length had no effect, the process conditions played a significant role. The production of composites via injection molding requires a pre-process to mix and pelletize the matrix polymer and reinforcement material. During extrusion, the matrix (fed through the main feeder) and fibers (fed through the side feeder) are blended and pelletized to obtain composite pellets, wherein the fibers are randomly distributed and made short as a result of extensive fiber breakage during extrusion.
In the present study, to analyze the effect of the extrusion process conditions on the mechanical and thermal conductivities, pellets were prepared using filler in the polymer matrix, and various mixing ratios and extrusion tests were performed. With PA6 as the base, composites were produced by blending CFs, which improve the strength, and Al2O3 as the filler, which increases the thermal conductivity. The mechanical and thermal properties of the composite were then analyzed according to the blending ratio and compounding process conditions. In addition, the morphology was analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) to determine the dispersibility of the fillers according to the process conditions.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Materials

PA6 with Hyosung 1011br, RV 2.4 (Korea) was used as the matrix resin in this work. In addition, spherical alumina (Al2O3) was used as the thermally conductive filler and particle reinforcement (Dongkuk R&S Co. Ltd., Gimhae, Korea). The chemical purity of Al2O3 exceeded 99.9%, and the DSP-AS series with 245 free Na+ [ppm] and 11 free Cl− [ppm] was used. Alumina with spherical particles of various sizes was used to improve the thermal conductivity by increasing the packing density [18,19]. Spherical alumina particles with a mean diameter of 5, 10, and 25 [μm] were selected. The particles were mixed in the ratio of 10:1:1. [20,21]. The CF (tensile strength ≥5000 MPa; elastic modulus, 250 GPa; density 1.8 kg/m3; diameter, 7 μm; length, 3–12 mm) was supplied by HYOSUNG Co. Ltd. (Korea). Table 1 lists the blending ratios of PA6, Al2O3, and CF. The mechanical properties of these samples with different blending ratios were analyzed.

2.2. Preparation of Composites

The samples to be tested were prepared in two steps. First, the mixture was pelletized using the same compounding conditions at the blending ratios provided in Table 1. The samples whose mechanical properties were analyzed were fabricated by injection molding. During the compounding of each sample in Table 1, an initial rotational screw speed of 300 RPM and melting temperature of 250 °C were used. In the second step, the pellets were fabricated by changing the conditions of the compounding process to determine the composition. Injection molding was performed with an injection temperature of 260 °C and injection pressure of 6.5 MPa.
When polyamides are exposed to humidity, the absorption of moisture affects some mechanical properties of PA6 compounds. In particular, the moisture acts as a plasticizer. This implies that properties like strength, stiffness, elongation, and toughness are affected. The plasticizing action of moisture is manifested in an increase in the impact strength and toughness of polyamide. Due to the polymeric chain distribution in the resin, the material experiences a reduction of strength and stiffness and an increase of elongation. [22,23]
Therefore, drying of PA6 is essential, and was performed in this study. The PA6 used in this study was applied on samples whose moisture content was controlled below 0.12% on average. Additionally, before blending the PA6 filler, the fibers were dried at 85 °C in a hopper dryer for 4 h to remove moisture. Fiber-reinforced thermally conductive PA6 composites were manufactured by a TSE 32 twin-screw extrude machine (UNEEPLUS Co. Ltd., Hwaseong, Korea) at a screw speed of 300~500 RPM and melting temperature range of 250~290 °C. The screw diameter in the extrusion machine was 32 mm, and the length-diameter ratio was 40. Samples were fabricated by applying NE-80 (i.e., a clamping force of 80 tons) (Woojin Plaimm Co. Ltd., Boeun, Korea) for injection molding. The effect of compounding on the properties of the sample was analyzed by fixing the injection molding temperature at 260 °C and injection pressure at 65 MPa.

2.3. Characterization

Tensile strength (Ts) tests were carried out at room temperature according to ASTM D638-14 [24] using a computer controlled QM 100TM universal testing machine ((Qmesys Co. Ltd., Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) with a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min. Flexural tests were also conducted on the universal testing machine at room temperature according to ASTM D790-17 [25]. The notched impact strengths of the composites were determined with a QM700A IZOD Type impact tester (Qmesys Co. Ltd., Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) at room temperature according to ASTM D256-10 [26]. Each test was repeated three times to obtain each reported value.
In addition, the melt flow index (MI) was measured via a method that involved determining the rate of extrusion of molten thermoplastic resins using an extrusion plastometer [27]. After a specified preheating time, the resin was extruded through a die with a specified length and orifice diameter under the prescribed conditions of temperature, load, and piston position in the barrel. The MI was measured after drying the sample at 100 °C for 2 h, using a QM280A (Qmesys Co. Ltd., Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) at a temperature of 235 °C and load of 1.0 kg according to ASTM D1238. [27]
The melting and crystallization behaviors of the composites were determined using a differential scanning calorimeter. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements were performed under nitrogen atmosphere using a DSC Q20 V24.11 Build 124, calibrated with high purity standards (indium), (TA Instruments, Lukens Drive, New Castle, USA) in the range of 50–250 °C. The samples used for DSC assessment, approximately 5–6 mg, were taken from the subsurface of the compounded specimens. The samples were heated to 250 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, and then cooled to 50 °C at 10 °C /min. The crystallization and second melting curves were recorded. [28,29] The crystallization and melting enthalpies were deduced by running a curve integral. The degree of crystallinity (Xc) was determined from DSC scans using the following equation
X c = Δ Hm ( 1 − φ 1 − φ 2 ) × Δ H m 0 × 100 %
where ΔHm is melting enthalpy of the samples, Δ H m 0 is the enthalpy value of melting of the 100 % crystalline form of PA6 (240 J/g) [17,30], φ 1 is the mass fraction of Al2O3 and φ 2 is the mass fraction of CF.
The thermal conductivity (Tc) of the composites was determined by the NETZSCH Geraetebau GmbH (LFA447), using a xenon flash lamp as the IR source. The thermal diffusivity was measured using the flash method, which is a noncontact measurement method, with no contact resistance with the sample, and the thermal conductivity was tested according to ASTM E1461. The testing samples had a diameter and a thickness of 12.7 mm and 2 mm, respectively. [31]
The morphology of the composites was observed by SEM (Sigma 500, Carl-Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. The samples were cryogenically fractured in liquid nitrogen, and all the fractured surfaces were coated with platinum to enhance the image resolution and prevent electrostatic charging. [27,32]

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Properties of the PA6/Al2O3/CF Composites

Table 2 lists the mechanical properties (tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength) and melt flow rates according to the blending ratio of PA6/Al2O3/CF. The tensile strength decreased as the proportion of Al2O3 increased, which was added to improve the thermal conductivity. The elongation decreased with increasing proportion of Al2O3 and CF. The addition of a rigid filler or fiber restricts the chain mobility of polymer molecules; this may lead to the formation of micro-cracks in the composites. Furthermore, increased stress concentration at the ends of fibers is another reason for crack formation in the matrix. It is known that, when the extent of cracks in the specimen reaches to a critical level especially in matrix surrounding fibers, matrix cannot resist to applied load and then cracks initiate in those regions [33,34,35]. The flexural strength decreased with increasing proportion of Al2O3. The mechanical strength of the composites containing alumina was low because alumina powder has weak interfacial bonding with the polymer matrix [36,37]. In addition, the mechanical strength decreased due to void formation between PA6 and alumina [38]. The extent to which the impact strength was influenced by the blending ratio of alumina and CF was difficult to confirm. Nevertheless, the impact strength of the specimens containing alumina and CF was greater than that of PA6/Al2O3/CF(0-0) without these materials.
MI represents the material characteristics and is indicative of the rheological behavior of polymers [39,40,41,42]. The MI decreased as the content of alumina increased. The MI of PA6/Al2O3/CF (0-0) was 63 g/10 min, while that of PA6/Al2O3/CF (65-0) decreased to 44 g/10 min.
While the heat transfer coefficient of the polymer PA6 was 0.29, that of the specimen with alumina was over three times higher. For the specimen with 60% alumina, its heat transfer coefficient was highest at 1.13. This study found that when a composite contained alumina, its mechanical strength (tensile, flexural, and impact strengths) and MI dropped, whereas its heat transfer coefficient increased. The mechanical properties improved significantly as the proportion of alumina and CF was increased. For specimens with 5% and 10% of CF each, the three types of mechanical strengths increased proportionally with the increase in carbon content.
The flow rate also decreased as the CF content increased [42]. Furthermore, comparing PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-0) with PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10), the difference in MI was 23.4 when the CF content increased by 10%. On the other hand, comparing PA6/Al2O3/CF (50-10) with PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10), the MI decreased by approximately 6 when the alumina content increased by 10%.
CF had a greater effect on the MI because the MI decreased more when the CF content increased than when the alumina content increased. In addition, comparing PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-0) with PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10), all the measured properties were relatively high except for the MI value.
The determination of the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of each sample according to the blending ratio enabled determination of the MI value at which the tensile strength and thermal conductivity were the highest. This is also the MI value most suitable for injection molding. Considering this, additional experiments were performed by changing the compounding conditions. To analyze the mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, crystallization and melting properties, and morphology according to the process conditions of the compounding, the blending ratio of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10), which exhibited the highest tensile strength and thermal conductivity, was selected based on the experimental results in Table 2.

3.2. Mechanical Properties and MI of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10) Composites under Varying Process Parameters

To analyze the mechanical properties and MI, pellets were produced by changing the compounding conditions of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10), and samples were fabricated under a fixed condition of injection molding. Nine compounding conditions were set by varying the temperature and RPM, and the tests were performed three times for each condition. The injection molding samples were fabricated under the same conditions using the pellets produced by compounding. The parameters for injection molding were as follows: melt temperature, 260 °C; injection pressure, 65 MPa; holding pressure, 60 MPa; holding time, 10 s; cooling time, 20 s. Table 3 outlines the experimental results for each compounding condition. The tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength, and melt flow rates were measured as a function of the temperature and RPM. The experimental results were analyzed by plotting the mechanical properties as a function of the process conditions in Figure 1 based on the data in Table 3.
Figure 1a shows the tensile strength according to the RPM and temperature. As the temperature and RPM increased, the tensile strength increased slightly. This appears to be the result of an increase in the blending state of the materials as the temperature and RPM increased. With the increase in RPM, the tensile strength increased by 1 MPa at a compounding temperature of 250 °C, while it increased by 1.8 MPa at 270 °C and by 1.5 MPa at 290 °C. On the other hand, the tensile strength increase due to the change in temperature was 2.3 MPa at 300 RPM, 2.6 MPa at 400 RPM, and 2.8 MPa at 500 RPM. This implies that temperature has a greater effect on the tensile strength than RPM.
Figure 1b shows a graph of the elongations according to the RPM and temperature. The difference between the maximum and minimum elongation was 0.18% at the same RPM (500 RPM) as the temperature changed. When the temperature was 290 °C, the difference in elongation as a result of varying the RPM was 0.13%. This suggests that the effect of temperature on the elongation is greater than that of RPM.
Figure 1c shows a graph of the flexural strength according to the RPM and temperature. The difference between the maximum and minimum flexural strengths when varying the RPM was 5.3 MPa at 290 °C, while that arising from varying the temperature was 4.5 MPa at 500 RPM. This suggests that the flexural strength increased as the temperature and RPM increased, and also indicated that the effect of RPM on the flexural strength was greater than that of temperature.
Figure 1d shows the flexural moduli. With increasing temperature and RPM, the flexural modulus increased overall, except in some sections where a reverse trend was observed. The flexural modulus was found to be more affected by temperature than by RPM.
The impact strength is plotted in Figure 1e, as a function of RPM for various temperatures; however, no significant trend was found. With increasing RPM, the impact strength at 250 °C and 290 °C decreased, while that at 270 °C increased.
Figure 1f shows the measured MI values of the pellets prepared under various extrusion conditions (ASTM D1238). In this case, the effect of temperature seemed to be greater than that of RPM. At 500 RPM, the MI showed the largest increase to 19.2 g/10 min as temperature changed from 250 °C to 290 °C. This implies that the viscosity of the mixture will be reduced with increasing RPM and temperature. Due to this, dispersibility of composite materials is assumed that. Analysis of the mechanical properties confirmed that the tensile strength, elongation, flexural strength, flexural modulus, and MI tended to increase as the RPM and temperature increased.

3.3. Thermal Conductivity of the Composites

Table 4 and Figure 2 show the results of the thermal conductivity measurements for various values of the RPM and temperature. The thermal conductivity did not show a linear relationship with RPM, but tended to increase slightly as the temperature increased. When the RPM was increased from 300 to 400, the heat transfer coefficient decreased at 250 °C and 270 °C, whereas it increased at 290 °C. When the RPM was increased to 500, the heat transfer coefficient rose at all these temperatures. The lowest thermal conductivity was 0.986 W/mK, obtained at 250 °C and 400 RPM, while the highest was 1.29 W/mK, obtained at 290 °C and 500 RPM. The heat transfer coefficient was also high when the temperature and RPM were set to the highest level.

3.4. Crystallization and Melting Properties

In semi-crystalline polymers, the crystallization behavior of the matrix has a significant influence on the physical properties of the corresponding composites [30,43,44]. DSC analysis was carried out to determine the crystallization and melting properties according to the change in RPM and temperature. Table 5 outlines the enthalpy changes according to the conditions. In addition, Figure 3a shows the melting curves with various compositions and Figure 3b, c and d show the DSC thermograms according to temperature and RPM during heating for each sample fabricated in this study. Semi-crystalline polymers can exhibit multiple melting endotherms which are generally attributed to the melting of imperfect crystals formed during the crystallization or different crystal types depending on the presence of specific fillers. Multiple melting behaviors have also been reported for PA6 and its composites in related studies [30,45,46,47,48]. As is well known, c-phase crystals are preferred at higher cooling rate, while the a-phase crystals dominate in slow cooling rate [30,49], and the two crystal forms are melting at about 215 °C (γ-form) and 225 °C (α-form), respectively. We can conclude that the double melting endotherms in the PA6 composite were probably caused by two different crystal structures. The peak temperatures during heating ranged from 219 °C to 221 °C. The Total melting enthalpy (ΔH) was calculated from the Tm. Degree of crystallinity (Xc) was calculated according to Equation (1). It is easy to find that the Xc was increased as the fillers increased. It can be concluded that CF and Al2O3 will restrict or block the movement and arrangement of PA6 chains, leading to more imperfect crystals and lower crystallinity. The change of Xc value with the change of content was observed, but it was difficult to find a meaningful change of Xc value with the change of process conditions.

3.5. Microstructures of the Composites

Figure 4 shows the SEM images of the raw materials; Figure 4a shows the PA6 matrix, Figure 4b shows spherical alumina, and Figure 4c, CF. Figure 5 shows the SEM images of the cross sections of the PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10) samples fabricated under different process conditions. The samples were cryogenically fractured for the SEM analysis. The CFs and Al2O3 are shown to be irregularly distributed in the matrix. It could be seen that the fibers aligned in different directions and were fine dispersed by shear force during extruding, which is of great importance for making CF reinforced polymer composites with mechanical properties [30]. In Figure 5a, CFs are concentrated in specific parts. This phenomenon is a typical disadvantage of composites and deteriorates the mechanical and thermal properties [50,51]. Figure 5a, c, d, and g show that the fibers and PA6 matrix are separated and are drawn out, and that they have voids. This indicates poor contact between the fibers and polymer matrix [52]. The Al2O3 particles, which were added as reinforcement to improve the thermal conductivity, must be in contact with each other to form a heat bridge and thereby improve the thermal conductivity. However, the SEM results in Figure 5 show that the Al2O3 particles are not in direct contact with each other, but are surrounded by polymer molecules, thereby preventing the thermal conductivity from improving. Hence, the ratio of reinforcement materials needs to be higher to improve the thermal conductivity of the composites.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, using pellets prepared with fillers contained in the polymer matrix, extrusion tests were carried out according to various compounding ratios and process conditions in order to analyze the effect of the extrusion process conditions on the mechanical and thermal conductivity characteristics. Alumina was effective toward improving the thermal conductivity; however, mechanical degradation occurred, whereas with CF, the mechanical properties were improved.
When pellets were manufactured by injecting molding at elevated temperatures and RPM, some improvements were observed in the mechanical properties of the PA6 composites, and thermal conductivity was also confirmed. In addition, the MI was confirmed to be affected by the pellet production temperature. The SEM results revealed separation between the fillers and polymer matrix, and irregular distribution of the fibers. The composites exhibited voids and weak contact. Further research is needed to improve adhesion through the surface treatment of fillers. The results of this study including the mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of the PA6 composites according to various blending ratios and process conditions could aid in the palletization of PA6 composites with the desired properties.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments, Y.S.K., J.K.K. and E.S.J.; Performed the experiments, Y.S.K., J.K.K. and E.S.J.; Analyzed the data, Y.S.K., J.K.K. and E.S.J.; Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, Y.S.K., J.K.K. and E.S.J.; Wrote the paper, Y.S.K., J.K.K. and E.S.J.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology through the Encouragement Program for The Industries of Economic Cooperation Region(P0006067).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guijun, Y.; Mira, P.; Soo-Jin, P. Recent progresses of fabrication and characterization of fibers-reinforced composites: A review. Compos. Commun. 2019, 14, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Imen, G.; Peng, W.; Damien, S.; Fatma, O.; Manuela, F.; Philippe, V. Investigation about the effect of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of natural fibre nonwovens reinforced thermoplastic composites. Materials 2019, 12, 2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, S.; Cao, X.Y.; Ma, Y.M.; Ke, Y.C.; Zhang, J.K.; Wang, F.S. The effects of particle size and content on the thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of Al2O3/high density polyethylene (HDPE) composites. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herzog, B.; Kohan, M.I.; Mestemacher, S.A.; Pagilagan, R.U.; Redmond, K. Polyamides. In Ullmann’s Polymers and Plastics; Elvers, B., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. Heo, M.H.; Kim, S.W.; Ha, G.R.; Mori, T.; Hong, K.H.; Seo, K.H. Discoloration and the Effect of Antioxidants on Thermo-Oxidative Degradation of Polyamide 6. Polym. Korea 2002, 26, 452. [Google Scholar]
  6. Alam, P.; Mamalis, D.; Robert, C.; Floreani, C.; O’Bradaigh, C.M. The fatigue of carbon fibre reinforced plastics—A review. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 166, 555–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karsli, N.G.; Ozkan, C.; Aytac, A.; Deniz, V. Effects of sizing materials on the properties of carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide 6,6 composites. Polym. Compos. 2013, 34, 1583–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, J. Interfacial studies on the O3 modified carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composites. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 2822–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eyob, W.; Zelalem, L.; Jooheon, K. Thermal Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane-/Silane-Modified Al2O3 Composite Fabricated via Melt Compounding. Polymers 2019, 11, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, J.; Ni, X.; Daso, F.; Xiao, X.; King, D.; Sánchez Gómez, J.; Blanco Varela, T.; Kessler, S.S.; Wardle, B.L. Advanced carbon fiber composite out-of-autoclave laminate manufacture via nanostructured out-of-oven conductive curing. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 166, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Centea, T.; Grunenfelder, L.K.; Nutt, S.R. A review of out-of-autoclave prepregs—Material properties, process phenomena, and manufacturing considerations. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 70, 132–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, D.; Salem, D.; Cinquin, J.; Piau, G.-P.; Bai, J. Impact of the spatial distribution of high content of carbon nanotubes on the electrical conductivity of glass fiber fabrics/epoxy composites fabricated by RTM technique. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 147, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, D.-H.; Lee, W.I.; Friedrich, K. A model for a thermoplastic pultrusion process using commingled yarns. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1065–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.K.; Song, Y.S. Injection molded mechanoluminescent polymer composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2018, 168, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, S.; Wang, P.; Tan, L.; Huang, H.; Guo, J. Relationship between screw structure and properties of recycled glass fiber reinforced flame retardant nylon 46. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 13296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahmed, M.; Leif, S.; Dieter, M.; Gerhard, Z. Effect of Extruder Elements on Fiber Dimensions and Mechanical Properties of Bast Natural Fiber Polypropylene Composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tan, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, D. Preparation, microstructures, and properties of long-glass-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites based on polycarbonate/poly(butylene terephthalate) alloys. J. Reinf. Pastics Cinoisutes 2015, 34, 1804–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hettiarachchi, H.A.C.K.; Mampearachchi, W.K. Effect of vibration frequency, size ratio and large particle volume fraction on packing density of binary spherical mixtures. Powder Technol. 2018, 336, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kwan, A.K.H.; Chan, K.W.; Wong, V. A 3-parameter particle packing model incorporating the wedging effect. Powder Technol. 2013, 237, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hiroaki, M.; Ko, H.; Hideto, Y. Powder Technology: Fundamentals of Particles, Powder Beds, and Particle Generation, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 299–302. [Google Scholar]
  21. McGEARY, R.K. Mechanical Packing of Spherical Particles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1961, 44, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aneta, K.; Jacek, G.; Branislav, D. Water absorption of thermoplastic matrix composites with polyamide 6. Sci. J. 2013, 33, 62–68. [Google Scholar]
  23. Palabiyik, M.; Bahadur, S. Mechanical and tribological properties of polyamide 6 and high density polyethylene polyblends with and without compatibilizer. Wear 2000, 246, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. ASTM D638-14, Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D638 (accessed on 17 August 2019).
  25. ASTM D790-17, Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforces Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D790.htm (accessed on 17 August 2019).
  26. ASTM D256-10, Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D256 (accessed on 17 August 2019).
  27. ASTM D1238-13, Standard Test Method for Melt Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D1238 (accessed on 17 August 2019).
  28. Wang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Cui, X.; Guo, W. Crystallization Behavior and Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhou, S.; Chen, Y.; Zou, H.; Liang, M. Thermally conductive composites obtained by flake graphite filling immiscible Polyamide 6/Polycarbonate blends. Thermochim. Acta 2013, 566, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, J.; Xu, Y.; Wei, Z.; Song, P.; Chen, G.; Zhang, W. Mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced PA6 composites. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2013, 115, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. ASTM E1461-13, Standard Test Method for Thermal Diffusivity by the Flash Method. Available online: https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1461.htm (accessed on 17 August 2019).
  32. Seong, D.G.; Kang, C.; Pak, S.Y.; Kim, C.H.; Song, Y.S. Influence of fiber length and its distribution in three phase poly(propylene) composites. Compos. Part B 2019, 168, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Illers, K.H. Polymorphie, Kristallinität und Schmelzwärme von poly(e-caprolactam), 2. Makromol. Chem. 1978, 179, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ozkoc, G.; Bayram, G.; Bayramlı, E. Short glass fiber reinforced ABS and ABS/PA6 composites: Processing and haracterization. Polym. Compos. 2005, 26, 745–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, S.Y.; Lauke, B.; Mader, E.; Hu, X.; Yue, C.Y. Tensile properties of short-glass-fiber and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. 2000, 31, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Luo, H.; Xiong, G.; Ma, C.; Li, D.; Wan, Y. Preparation and performance of long carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composites injection-molded from core/shell structured pellets. Mater. Des. 2014, 64, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ren, F.; Zhou, R.; Sun, F.; Ma, H.; Zhou, Z.; Xu, W. Blocked isocyanate silane modified Al2O3/polyamide 6 thermally conductive and electrical insulation composites with outstanding mechanical properties. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 29779–29785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Satheeskumar, S.; Kanagaraj, G. Experimental investigation on tribological behaviours of PA6, PA6-reinforced Al2O3 and PA6-reinforced graphite polymer composites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2016, 39, 1467–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wieme, T.; Duan, L.; Mys, N.; Cardon, L.; D’hooge, D. Effect of Matrix and Graphite Filler on Thermal Conductivity of Industrially Feasible Injection Molded Thermoplastic Composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ranvijay, K.; Rupinder, S.; Ahuja, I.P.S.; Ada, A.; Rosa, P. Friction welding for the manufacturing of PA6 and ABS structures reinforced with Fe particles. Compos. Part B 2018, 132, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cristina, P.; George, P.; Adriana, S.; Ecaterina, A.; Ion, D.; Anton, F.; Roxana, T. Mechanical properties of polyamide/carbon-fiber-fabric composites. MTAEC9 2016, 50, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferg, E.E.; Bolo, L.L. A correlation between the variable melt flow index and the molecular mass distribution of virgin and recycled polypropylene used in the manufacturing of battery cases. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 1452–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, H.; Jiang, F.; Lei, F.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Leng, J.; Sun, D. Graphite fluoride reinforced PA6 composites: Crystallization and mechanical properties. Mater. Today Commun. 2018, 16, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Weon, J.I.; Sue, H.J. Effects of clay orientation and aspect ratio on mechanical behavior of nylon-6 nanocomposite. Polymer 2005, 46, 6325–6334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, J.; Fang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Tong, L.; Gu, A.; Liu, F. Isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotubes/polyamide-6 composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 3531–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wu, B.; Gong, Y.; Yang, G. Non-isothermal crystallization of polyamide 6 matrix in all-polyamide composites: Crystallization kinetic, melting behavior, and crystal morphology. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 5184–5191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, X.; Zhang, B. The effects of annealing (solid and melt) on the time evolution of the polymorphic structure of polyamide 6. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 1688–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, T.; Phang, I.; Shen, L.; Chow, S.; Zhang, W. Morphology and mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes reinforced nylon-6 composites. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 7214–7222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nan, L.; Xiuxiu, Y.; Feng, B.; Yunxing, P.; Chenghao, W.; Bo, C.; Lishuai, Z.; Chengde, L.; Jinyan, W.; Xigao, J. Improved Mechanical Properties of Copoly(Phthalazinone Ether Sulphone)s Composites Reinforced by Multiscale Carbon Fibre/Graphene Oxide Reinforcements: A Step Closer to Industrial Production. Polymers 2019, 11, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yan, M.; Masahito, U.; Tomohiro, Y.; Toshi, S.; Yuqiu, Y.; Hiroyuki, H. A comparative study of the mechanical properties and failure behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy and carbon fiber/polyamide 6 unidirectional composites. Compos. Struct. 2017, 160, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, J.; Cai, C.L. The carbon fiber surface treatment and addition of PA6 on tensile properties of ABS composites. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2011, 11, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, M.; Wan, Y.; Gao, Z.; Xiong, G.; Wang, X.; Wan, C.; Luo, L. Preparation and properties of polyamide 6 thermal conductive composites reinforced with fibers. Mater. Design 2013, 51, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 03047 g001 550
Figure 1. Mechanical properties and MI of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10) composites with varying process parameters: (a) tensile strength, (b) elongation, (c) flexural strength, (d) flexural modulus, (e) impact strength, and (f) melt flow rates.
Figure 1. Mechanical properties and MI of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10) composites with varying process parameters: (a) tensile strength, (b) elongation, (c) flexural strength, (d) flexural modulus, (e) impact strength, and (f) melt flow rates.
Materials 12 03047 g001
Materials 12 03047 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermal conductivity of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10) composites for varying process parameters.
Figure 2. Thermal conductivity of PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10) composites for varying process parameters.
Materials 12 03047 g002
Materials 12 03047 g003 550
Figure 3. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) heating thermograms of PA6/Al2O3/CF composites for various conditions. (a) DSC thermograms of composites with different weight ratios, (b) Samples fabricated at 250 °C, (c) Samples fabricated at 270 °C, (d) Samples fabricated at 290 °C.
Figure 3. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) heating thermograms of PA6/Al2O3/CF composites for various conditions. (a) DSC thermograms of composites with different weight ratios, (b) Samples fabricated at 250 °C, (c) Samples fabricated at 270 °C, (d) Samples fabricated at 290 °C.
Materials 12 03047 g003
Materials 12 03047 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of raw materials (a) PA6; (b) Al2O3; (c) Carbon fiber.
Figure 4. SEM images of raw materials (a) PA6; (b) Al2O3; (c) Carbon fiber.
Materials 12 03047 g004
Materials 12 03047 g005a 550Materials 12 03047 g005b 550
Figure 5. SEM images of the reinforced composites with various process parameters. (a) 250 °C, 300 RPM; (b) 250 °C, 400 RPM; (c) 250 °C, 500 RPM; (d) 270 °C, 300 RPM; (e) 270 °C, 400 RPM; (f) 270 °C, 500 RPM; (g) 290 °C, 300 RPM; (h) 290°C, 400 RPM; (i) 290 °C, 500 RPM.
Figure 5. SEM images of the reinforced composites with various process parameters. (a) 250 °C, 300 RPM; (b) 250 °C, 400 RPM; (c) 250 °C, 500 RPM; (d) 270 °C, 300 RPM; (e) 270 °C, 400 RPM; (f) 270 °C, 500 RPM; (g) 290 °C, 300 RPM; (h) 290°C, 400 RPM; (i) 290 °C, 500 RPM.
Materials 12 03047 g005aMaterials 12 03047 g005b
Table
Table 1. Composition of samples with varying content of PA6, Al2O3, and carbon fiber used for the preparation of polymer blends.
Table 1. Composition of samples with varying content of PA6, Al2O3, and carbon fiber used for the preparation of polymer blends.
Sample DesignationComposition (wt%)
PA6Al2O3CF
PA6/Al2O3/CF (0-0)100
PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-0)4060-
PA6/Al2O3/CF (65-0)3565-
PA6/Al2O3/CF (50-5)45505
PA6/Al2O3/CF (50-10)405010
PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10)306010
Table
Table 2. Properties of PA6/Al2O3/CF composites with different weight ratios.
Table 2. Properties of PA6/Al2O3/CF composites with different weight ratios.
Sample DesignationTensile Strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Flexural Strength (MPa)Impact Strength (kJ/m2)Melt Flow Rates (g/10 min)Thermal Conductivity (W/mK)
PA6/Al2O3/CF (0-0)72.2 ± 0.130 ± 0.01105.6 ± 0.52.9 ± 0.163.00.29 ± 0.002
PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-0)60.4 ± 0.21.33 ± 0.01100.7 ± 0.73.3 ± 0.146.21.13 ± 0.001
PA6/Al2O3/CF (65-0)55.1 ± 0.21.0 ± 0.0299.3 ± 0.63.1 ± 0.244.40.98 ± 0.004
PA6/Al2O3/CF (50-5)69.5 ± 0.41.83 ± 0.02115.8 ± 1.53.9 ± 0.337.20.70 ± 0.001
PA6/Al2O3/CF (50-10)75.3 ± 0.31.15 ± 0.01133.9 ± 0.84.4 ± 0.128.80.85 ± 0.001
PA6/Al2O3/CF (60-10)76.9 ± 0.60.99 ± 0.01127.4 ± 1.24.3 ± 0.222.81.29 ± 0.001
Table
Table 3. Mechanical properties and MI of PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10) composites for various combinations of the two processing parameters.
Table 3. Mechanical properties and MI of PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10) composites for various combinations of the two processing parameters.
Parameters of Compounding ProcessTensile Strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Flexural Strength (MPa)Flexural Modulus (GPa)Impact Strength (kJ/m2)Melt Flow Rates (g/10 min)
Temp. (°C)RPM
25030076.9 ± 0.40.99 ± 0.01127.1 ± 2.113.4 ± 0.24.3 ± 0.0122.8
25040077.6 ± 0.11.05 ± 0.00127.8 ± 0.513.3 ± 0.13.9 ± 0.0224.0
25050077.9 ± 0.11.04 ± 0.02128.8 ± 0.713.9 ± 0.23.9 ± 0.0324.6
27030078.6 ± 0.81.04 ± 0.02127.7 ± 2.013.6 ± 0.33.9 ± 0.0425.8
27040078.1 ± 0.91.06 ± 0.03129.9 ± 2.214.0 ± 0.14.2 ± 0.0329.4
27050080.4 ± 0.51.07 ± 0.03131.6 ± 2.813.9 ± 0.25.2 ± 0.0133.6
29030079.2 ± 0.31.04 ± 0.02128.0 ± 0.214.3 ± 0.14.4 ± 0.0233.0
29040080.2 ± 0.41.17 ± 0.01131.8 ± 1.814.3 ± 0.14.4 ± 0.0335.4
29050080.7 ± 0.21.17 ± 0.02133.3 ± 2.314.5 ± 0.24.2 ± 0.0243.8
Table
Table 4. Thermal conductivity of the PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10) composites for various process parameters of compounding.
Table 4. Thermal conductivity of the PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10) composites for various process parameters of compounding.
Parameters of Compounding ProcessThermal Conductivity (W/mK)
Temp. (°C)RPM
2503001.043 ± 0.004
2504000.986 ± 0.006
2505001.094 ± 0.004
2703001.102 ± 0.003
2704001.077 ± 0.002
2705001.178 ± 0.001
2903001.100 ± 0.003
2904001.155 ± 0.003
2905001.290 ± 0.006
Table
Table 5. Differential scanning calorimetry DSC results for PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10) composites with varying weight ratios and process parameters.
Table 5. Differential scanning calorimetry DSC results for PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10) composites with varying weight ratios and process parameters.
Sample DesignationProcess Parameters of CompoundingDSC Data
Temp. (°C)RPMTm (°C)ΔH (J/g)Xc (%)
PA6/Al2O3/CF(50-5)250300220.8432.1429.76
PA6/Al2O3/CF(50-10)220.5927.5228.67
PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10)220.6621.9230.44
PA6/Al2O3/CF(60-10)250400220.5521.3529.65
250500220.1420.2228.08
270300220.4522.3030.97
270400220.2522.4531.18
270500220.0623.3732.46
290300221.2421.9230.44
290400220.2922.2830.94
290500219.9122.2630.92

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, Y.S.; Kim, J.K.; Jeon, E.S. Effect of the Compounding Conditions of Polyamide 6, Carbon Fiber, and Al2O3 on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of the Composite Polymer. Materials 2019, 12, 3047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183047

AMA Style

Kim YS, Kim JK, Jeon ES. Effect of the Compounding Conditions of Polyamide 6, Carbon Fiber, and Al2O3 on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of the Composite Polymer. Materials. 2019; 12(18):3047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183047

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Young Shin, Jae Kyung Kim, and Euy Sik Jeon. 2019. "Effect of the Compounding Conditions of Polyamide 6, Carbon Fiber, and Al2O3 on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of the Composite Polymer" Materials 12, no. 18: 3047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183047

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop