Next Article in Journal
Design of a Low Scattering Metasurface for Stealth Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultrasound-Mediated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)
Previous Article in Journal
Laser Synthesis of Iridium Nanospheres for Overall Water Splitting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/ma12183030
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization for the Preparation of Well-Defined Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanomaterials

by
Monika Flejszar
and
Paweł Chmielarz
*
Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszow University of Technology, Al. Powstańców Warszawy 6, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(18), 3030; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183030
Submission received: 21 August 2019 / Revised: 8 September 2019 / Accepted: 12 September 2019 / Published: 18 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP) in Synthesis of Precisely Defined Polymers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) is a powerful tool that allows for the synthesis of organic–inorganic hybrid nanomaterials with high potential applications in many disciplines. This review presents synthetic achievements and modifications of nanoparticles via SI-ATRP described in literature last decade. The work mainly focuses on the research development of silica, gold and iron polymer-grafted nanoparticles as well as nature-based materials like nanocellulose. Moreover, typical single examples of nanoparticles modification, i.e., ZnO, are presented. The organic–inorganic hybrid systems received according to the reversible deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) approach with drastically reduced catalyst complex concentration indicate a wide range of applications of materials including biomedicine and microelectronic devices.

1. Introduction

The crucial moment coming with the development of reversible deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) methods was the invention of the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) technique [1,2,3,4]. ATRP is one of the most widely used configuration of RDRP solutions, based on adequate equilibrium between active radicals and dormant species [5,6,7,8,9]. In the next stage, propagating radicals in the presence of monomers are deactivated and returned to dormant state. The controlled nature of ATRP allows to obtains polymers that are distinguished by a narrow molecular weight distribution (MWD) and diverse molecular architecture [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In this context, precise control over molecular weight (MW), composition and brush thickness provides interesting opportunity to synthesis a variety of functional (co)polymer brushes [18,19]. Subsequent advantage in polymer synthesis via ATRP methods is a library of compatible monomers including mono- and polyfunctional acrylates [20,21,22], α-substituted monomers [23,24] and also acrylamides [25,26,27], which makes this method attractive for the preparation of a wide range of commercially available polymers and hybrid materials.
In ATRP reactions, the presence of the transition metal catalytic complex (generally CuIX/L) plays a crucial role [5]. The dormant species (alkyl halides) react reversibly with catalyst–metal complexes in lower oxidation state CuIX/L causing the formation of reactive radicals (Pn●) and the transition of metal complex with coordinated metal ligand to higher oxidation stage (CuIIX2/L) [27,28]. The process of a single or several monomer addition is deactivated by the reaction, in which the growing radicals are converted to dormant species and in the same time a catalytic complex in the lower oxidation stage is regenerated (Scheme 1) [21,29].
Hybrid polymer materials are based on the covalent linkage of the polymer chain to the various inorganic substrates including nanoparticles (NPs), flat and cylindrical surfaces or the inner surface of the nanopores [30]. Such surface modification can be achieved via different techniques including (a) grafting-from [31,32,33,34,35]; (b) grafting-through [36,37,38]; (c) grafting-onto [39,40,41].
The grafting-from method uses the presence of a polymerization initiator connected by a covalent bond to the substrate surface enabling the formation of polymer chains on inorganic surfaces. Additionally, the initiating group may be an integral part of the polymer chain, or could be attached so as to functionalize on the surface. Control over the architecture, density, functionality and thickness of a grafted polymer chain is the main advantage of the grafting-from approach. In addition, this method can be applied to surfaces of various geometries including flat surfaces, nanoparticles and porous materials, as well as compositions of complex metals, metal oxides and natural compounds [42,43,44]. Ultimately, it leads to the production of hybrid materials with high grafting density [30,35]. Scheme 2 presents the reaction scheme involving “grafting-from” method.
In the second technique, grafting-through, the first step includes an addition of a polymerized monomer unit to the modified surface. Subsequently, the created macromonomer is copolymerized with low molecular weight monomers. This approach enables the synthesis of nanomaterials using inorganic macromonomers as well as natural products and other polymers [45,46]. The ratio of monomer and macromonomer concentrations used in the synthesis determines the density of polymer chains grafting, but in most cases grafting-through approach enables obtaining lower density brushes than grafting-from or grafting-onto, therefore it is less frequently used. Scheme 3 presents the reaction scheme for “grafting-through” method.
The grafting-onto approach is based on reaction between functionalized polymer brushes and surface substrate including associated functional groups compatible to end-functional group in polymer chains. The steric hindrance and slow diffusion of polymer molecule to substrate surface partially limit employment of this method in the synthesis of polymer hybrid. However, “click chemistry” successfully applies grafting-onto to linking polymer chains with functionalized surface in reaction via CuI-catalyzed azide–alkine cycloaddition [47,48]. A significant advantage of the grafting-onto approach over other approaches is the possibility of prior physical and chemical characterization of the polymer to be attached. Then, the result is a well-defined material with no complicated synthetic procedure (Scheme 4) [49,50].
The ability to synthesize polymer brushes on the surface of nanoparticles (e.g., gold (Au) [51,52], silver (Ag) [53], silica (Si) [35,54], titanium (Ti) [55], cobalt (Co) [56], and zinc (Zn) [39]) via the SI-ATRP approach provides efficient tool that can be applied in a wide range of engineering applications such as a membrane technology [57] as well as biomedical applications [56,58,59,60] including immunotherapy [61] and antifouling surfaces [62].

2. Gold Nanoparticles

The organic polymer layer covering the metallic core of the gold nanoparticles leads to the creation of hybrid materials, which can be used as a molecular diagnostic tool as well as element of the drug delivery system, hence the wide interest in the modification of such nanoparticles exhibiting high application ability in biomedical fields. It is worth noting that intensified research on the modification of gold nanoparticles in recent years effected in simple modifications [63] through a core–shell structure of gold NPs [64] or even advanced biomedical applications such as the SiRNA delivery system reported in 2018 [52].
In 2010, Chakraborty et al. grafted poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) from Au NPs via SI-ATRP using 2-bromopropionyl bromide (2-bpb) as the initiator. The polymerization was carried out under environmentally friendly conditions with an aqueous solution at room temperature. In the first step of the performed modification, 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol (AEE) was coupled to carboxyl-functionalized gold nanoparticles using N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS), resulting in the terminal group being a hydroxyl group (Scheme 5A). In the second stage, the hydroxyl-terminated gold nanoparticles reacted with the 2-bpb initiator in the presence of tetrahydrofuran/triethylamine (THF/TEA) (Scheme 5B). Finally, the NPs were inoculated with an initiator and after that were exposed to N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) in the presence of a catalytic complex (CuICl/CuIIBr2/2,2′-bipyridyl (bpy)) to undergo polymerization to form nanoparticles grafted with PNIPAM (Scheme 5C) [63].
Recently, Song et al. [64] presented dependence between the shape of polymeric gold hybrid nanoparticles versus the ratio between initiator and the Au NPs used in SI-ATRP with 917 ppm of Cu catalyst species (CuIBr/N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA)). The core–shell or asymmetric structures has been prepared through adjusting the proportion of disulfide initiator and gold nanoparticles.
In order to simplify the experimental design and reduce the toxicity of used solvents such as THF or N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), gold nanoparticles were transferred to the organic phase using ammonium bromide tetraoctyl (TAOB) as a phase transfer agent. The polymerization reaction of styrene was carried out in cyclohexane at 70 °C for 4 h in an inert gas atmosphere. The amount of the initiator on the nanoparticle surface affected the thickness of the grafted brushes and the formation of new hybrid structures. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) pictures showed that if 0.025–0.25 mL of disulfide initiator was added to the gold nanoparticles, an asymmetric structure of polystyrene–gold hybrid was obtained and a single gold nanoparticle was attached with a polystyrene sphere (Figure 1). If the disulfide initiator was in excess, the particles of the core–shell polymer–metal nanohybrid material was synthesized as a gold nanoparticle encapsulated by a uniform polymeric coating [64].
More recently, Kim et al. [52] reported an interesting SiRNA delivery system involving gold nanoparticles modified via surface initiated ATRP technique with 10,000 ppm of CuIBr/bpy. The first stage includes the synthesis of polymeric multiply coatings using monomers such as (diethylamine)ethyl methacrylate (DAMA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Then SiRNAs molecules were electrostatically incorporated with Au NPs cationic coatings, where the charge of the attached SiRNA is controlled by various number of coatings. In order to produce multiple coatings on gold nanoparticles, a disulfide initiator was used to connect polymeric layers and disintegrated under cytoplasmic conditions (Scheme 6). Intravenous delivery of siRNA anti-c-Myc for an A549 tumor xenograft murine model showed a significant tumor regression [52].

3. Silica Nanoparticles

Undoubtedly, silica nanoparticles are the most common and most widely used nanoparticles modified via the SI-ATRP method with various monomers including methyl acrylate (MA) [65], methyl methacrylate (MMA) [66], 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA) [67], styrene [68,69], 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate [70], γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (PMPTS) [71], (N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) [72,73,74,75], poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate [76,77], NIPAM [78,79,80,81], tert-butyl acrylate (tBA) [35,82], di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (DEGMA) [83] and other monomers [54,80,84,85,86,87]. These hybrid nanomaterials combine the advantages of nanoparticles including its rigidity and stability and organic polymer layers characterized by flexibility, processability and functionality to enlarge the potential applications such nanohybrids. Recent literature reports show that the grafting of polymer brushes from the surface of Si nanoparticles was applied, among others, to produce cross-linked polymer nanocapsules [65,67], coatings with excellent anti-icing properties [85] and protein-resistance characteristic [77] as well as pH-responsive hybrid Janus colloids [75].

3.1. Superhydrophobic Nanocomposite Material Based on Silica Nanoparticles

Wettability of flat surfaces is a phenomenon that plays an important role both in nature and in industrial applications [88]. Surface roughness and chemical interactions occurring on a flat surface determine the wetting angle characterizing the appropriate material. In the last decade, superhydrophobic surfaces with a wetting angle greater than 100 ° and even above 150 ° for materials with rough or hierarchical nanostructure attract increasing attention [89,90,91]. Therefore, numerous attempts to obtain superphydrophobic systems using silica nanoparticles modified with SI-ATRP method can be found in the literature [68,71,85,92].
The controlled manner of the synthesis of organic–inorganic hydrophobic hybrid nanoparticles modified with polystyrene (SiO2/PS) and polystyrene-b-poly(methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane) (SiO2/PS-b-PMPTS) was presented by Yu et al. [68]. They synthesized SiO2/PS and SiO2/PS-b-PMPTS platforms using initiator-modified SiO2 particles (SiO2/APTS-Br) via SI-ATRP with 20,000 ppm of Cu catalyst species (Scheme 7).
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs taken for silica nanoparticles before and after grafting of polymer brushes clearly indicated the presence of a homogeneous polymer coating on the surface of the metallic core. The uniformly distributed silica nanoparticles observed under the microscope differed in their microstructure and surface roughness. For nanoparticles modified with PS-b-PMPTS copolymer, a fine-grained surface consisting of microphases separated from each other was observed. The particle size of SiO2/PS and SiO2/PS-b-PMPTS estimated from SEM measurements showed around 45 and 90 nm, respectively. The wetting angle value determined for SiO2/PS was 153 ° and for SiO2/PS-b-PMPTS 143°, both obtained hybrid systems showed superhydrophobic properties dependent on the combination of roughness and surface chemistry.
More recently, Zhan et al. [85] described a superhydrophobic hybrid nanocomposite with excellent anti-icing properties synthesized via activators generated by electron transfer (AGET) ATRP with 9090 ppm of CuIIBr2/PMDETA [85]. n-Butyl acrylate (BA) and 2-(N-ethyl-perfluorooctanesulphamido) acrylate (EFOA) were grafted from amino-functionalized silica nanoparticles SiO2–NH–Br using ethyl α-bromoisobutyrate (EBiB) as an efficient initiator. The pristine silica nanoparticles was previously functionalized by triethylamine and 2-bromoisobutyrate according to Scheme 8.
The anti-icing properties of the synthesized material were confirmed by contact angle measurement showing the extremely high value (170°) for nanoparticles covered with a layer of copolymer. Moreover, the delay in crystallization of condensed water was observed. The copolymer coating not only promotes the removal of droplets but also delays the freezing time (Figure 2). The time needed to freeze a drop of water on a surface with a temperature of −18 °C was 10,054 s. The P(BA-co-EFOA) polymer layer on the nanoparticle surface forms a kind of adiabatic layer that contributes to the reduction of crystallization temperature by 6.82 °C and guarantees a high application potential of functionalized NPs.
Silicon nitride (SiN4) can also be used as the metallic core of organic–inorganic hybrid nanosystems using silica nanoparticles. The material used in ceramics, due to its abrasion resistance and thermal resistance, was subjected to functionalization and then the brushes of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were grafted from the surface of SiN4 NPs [92]. Si3N4 nanoparticles covered with a layer of polymer brushes are characterized by better dispersibility and stability in organic solvents than unmodified nanoparticles. Consequently, it is possible to select the type of grafted polymer brushes depending on the potential application of the nanomaterial [92].

3.2. Stimuli-Responsive Hybrid Materials Based on Silica NPs

Intelligent nanodevices created by the development of modern microelectronics require the application of advanced materials such as silicon wafers or silica NPs modified with a layer of stimulated-responsive polymer brushes. Therefore, efficient way of obtaining modern materials responding to external stimuli are intensively sought. The most frequently proposed solution is grafting from the surface of NPs (co)polymer brushes containing thermo-sensitive PNIPAM as a building segment [78,79,80,81].
In 2012, thermo-responsive amphiphilic Janus Si NPs were received via a combination of “polymer single crystal templating” and “grafting-from” approach [78]. In the first step, silica nanoparticles with a diameter of 40–50 nm were immobilized on the surface of single crystals. Then on the uncovered part of Si NPs PNIPAM brushes were grafted using SI-ATRP methodology with CuIIBr2/tris [2-(dimethylamino) ethyl] amine (Me6TREN) (12,000–12,050 ppm) as a catalytic complex. After dissolution of single-polymer crystals, Janus NPs with bicompartment poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and PNIPAM brushes were received.
Using staining methods and a TEM microscope, the asymmetrical character of the synthesized material was demonstrated. Moreover, comparison of Janus NPs with NPs modified with PNIPAM brushes only showed that lower transition temperature and narrower transition range were observed for Janus NPs. As a result of the presence of PCL chains on the surface of nanoparticles, hydrophobic interactions leading to much greater driving force for the agglomeration of Janus particles within the temperature range of lower critical solution temperature (LCST) (Scheme 9) [78].
More recently, the synthesis of silica nanoparticles modified with thermo-sensitive PNIPAM brushes to produce inorganic-organic microspheres with core/shell structure (SPM) was described [79]. Then SPM was dispersed in aqueous solution and packed as photonic crystals (PC) in a dry state, thereafter using optical microscopy the packing behavior of photonic crystals was observed.
By increasing the temperature above the LCST of PNIPAM, reversible swelling and shrinkage of the PNIPAM coating causes dispersion and the precipitation of SPM in aqueous solution. When the temperature rises above the LCST, the microdispersed PCs were packed tightly. Changing distances as the temperature rises above LCST, it changed color from red to blue, which could have resulted in to be watched with the naked eye for incident angle. Therefore, such materials have high application potential to be used as a visual temperature sensor [79].
Interestingly, Wu et al. [80] have synthesized hybrid silica nanoparticles densely-grafted with dually-responsive macromolecular brushes via SI-ATRP, for perspective application to construction of smart nanodevices e.g., in nanoelectronic solutions.
In the first step of facile synthesis of thermo and pH dual-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-b-poly(4-vinylpyridine)-grafted silica nanoparticles (SiNPs-g-PNIPAM-b-P4VP) an ATRP initiator-functionalized silane, was attached onto the surfaces of Si NPs to initiate ATRP (4350–12,580 ppm of CuICl/Me6TREN) of thermo-sensitive NIPAM from the nanoparticle surface (Scheme 10). Respectively, halogen exchange and sacrificial initiator were introduced to ensure the controlled manner of polymerization process [80].
The original idea of generation and thermally adjustable catalysis of silver nanoparticle immobilized temperature-sensitive silicon nanocomposite and mild reducing reactions was proposed by Xu et al. [81]. Firstly, PNIPAM was grafted from Si NPs surface via ATRP with 12,500 ppm of catalyst spices (CuIBr/PMDETA), and then the mild reduction reaction led to the anchoring of Ag nanoparticles on the surface of the polymer layer covering the metallic core of the synthesized system.
The structural hybrid composite consisting of silica nanoparticles coated with the PNIPAM-Ag coating showed good dispersing properties. Furthermore, the thermo-sensitive properties of the polymeric coating enable the control of the amount of aggregated Ag catalyst on the polymer carrier. The resulting system serves as a catalytic system for the degradation of various nitrobenzenes and organic pigments in an aqueous solution with sodium borohydride (NaBH4) at ambient temperature. Hence, the presented material can be used in sensing devices and particular in water purification as well as green chemistry [81].
Recently, Penelas et al. have developed bioinert core-brush hybrid nanoparticles modified with thermosensitive DEGMA for future applications in biosensor, tissue engineering and optical system [83].
Three different synthetic approaches have been presented that have successfully led to PEG-functionalized colloids (Scheme 11). Two types of chloropropyltriethoxysilane (CPTES) and (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTS) initiators were immobilized on the surface of nanoparticles and used to perform surface initiated controlled radical polymerization (ATRP with 20,000 ppm of catalyst complex). Then, PDEGMA brushes were grafted from previously modified nanoparticles SiO2-Br and SiO2-Cl. Moreover, photo-grafting is the third equally effective synthetic route for (SiO2-V)-g-PDEGMA NPs preparation [83].

3.3. Amphiphilic Polymer Coatings in Preparation of Hybrid Nanocomposites via SI-ATRP

Various approaches to find the optimal and efficient way to obtain stabilized colloidal solutions of nanoparticles for optics, electronic or biomedicine devices were taking into consideration [93,94,95]. In addition to ligand stabilization or surface silanization, another way is to use amphiphilic monomers to synthesize polymer coatings stabilizing nanoparticles in aqueous solution. This subsection presents the latest selected achievements in the synthesis of amphiphilic polymer coatings by surface-initiated ATRP.
The novel strategy to create crosslinking nanocapsules with the use of surface initiated ATRP approach was published by the Liu research group [65,67] from Lanzhou University in 2009 and 2010.
The first attempt to obtain nanocapsules via SI-ATRP with 13,600 ppm of CuIBr/bpy from previously a modified silica nanotemplate was made with the use of poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) [65] then, following the direction of biomedical applications and the design of drug delivery systems, the biocompatible PHEA (10,030 ppm of CuIBr/bpy) according to Scheme 12 was used [67]. After the modification of hydroxyl side-groups of silica NPs by PHEA polymer brushes was crosslinked with hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), subsequently the silica templates encapsulated in the crosslinked polymer shells were removed by etching with HF to create the precisely designed nanocapsules with a diameter ca. 20–50 nm [67].
Recently, Wang et al. prepared well-defined densely grafted poly(2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) brushes grafted from silica nanoparticles [70]. Synthesis of 2-bromoisobutyrate-functionalized silica nanoparticles was performed via two different approaches (Scheme 13). At first, SiO2-NH2 nanoparticles, toluene and triethylamine, were placed in a flask and then α-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB) was added dropwise. The reaction was carried out at 0 °C for 30 min and then at room temperature for 24 h. The second approach was based on synthesis of macroinitiators of SiO2 coated with γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-α-bromoisobutyryl bromide (APTES-BIBB). Thus, SiO2 was mixed with dry toluene to produce a homogeneous suspension and then APTES-BIBB was added. The synthesis was realized via ATRP with 4070 ppm of catalyst complex (CuIBr/PMDETA) [70].
Spherical shape of the resulting nanocomposite with core-shell morphology and diameter of about 50 nm was confirmed by SEM technique (Figure 3) [70].
Meanwhile, Yu [72] synthesized PDMAEMA on the surface of hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles (HMSN) by SI-ATRP technique with 6670 ppm of CuICl/Me6TREN complex (Scheme 14).
Poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) as a thermal- and pH-responsive polymer with biocompatibility and antibacterial activity, seem to be an ideal candidate to apply in drug delivery systems and other biomedical applications. These hybrid nanoparticles have been proven to have a high storage capacity that can be used in delivery system for medicines. The external pH-responsive PDMAEMA layer covered mesoporous silica materials allows to control release of encapsulated molecules [72].
More recently, Liu et al. [73] have reported triple responsive polymer brushes including thermo-, pH- and photo-sensitive monomers (Scheme 15). The copolymer brushes of DMAEMA and 1’-(2-acryloxyethyl)-3’,3’-dimethyl-6-nitrospiro-(2H-1-benzopyran-2,2’-indoline) (SPMA) were synthesized from 2-bromoisobutyrate-functionalized Si NPs via SI-ATRP with 6260 ppm Cu catalytic complex.
Palladium is usually used as a catalyst in the hydrogenation reaction of styrene. Catalytically active metal can be loaded into substrates of various types. The comparison of the catalytic action of SiO2-g-P(SPMA-co-DMAEMA) without loading palladium and SiO2-g-p(SPMA-co-DMAEMA)-Pd clearly indicates much better catalytic activity of hybrid silica after palladium loading [73].
The original idea of pH-responsive polyampholytic hybrid Janus nanoparticles was presented by Falireas et al. [75]. Authors prepared hybrid nanoparticles comprising an inorganic silica core and a shell including poly(acrylic acid) (PAA) and PDMAEMA grafted polymer chains according to ATRP methodology with 210,000 ppm of CuIBr/PMDETA complex. Janus NPs initiators were successfully synthesized using the Pickering emulsion method (Scheme 16). For this purpose, silica nanoparticles were previously functionalized with APTES and then used to stabilize PS molecules. Hybrid colloidosomes with a diameter of 1 mm were formed and the packing density of colloidal silica beads on the PS surface was quite low. Before the polymerization of DMAEMA from the uncovered surface of the PtBA-g-SiO2-g-APTES, it was necessary to eliminate the bromide end-groups of the polymer to avoid the chain growth of the PtBA chains with DMAEMA on the first hemisphere of the NPs. In accordance with literature data [96,97], bromide groups were removed by a radical chain transfer reaction using excess PMDETA in the presence of CuIBr under monomer free conditions.
Finally, a well-defined hybrid of polyampholyte Janus NPs consisting of a metallic core and a polymeric shell from the PAA and PDMAEMA chains was synthesized using multistage surface initiated ATRP and post-polymerization polymer hydrolysis process.

4. Magnetic Nanoparticles (MNPs)—Iron Oxide Modified via SI-ATRP

Nanoparticles of metal oxides, especially iron oxides, show many distinctive properties, including electrical, optical and magnetic properties, which are not observed in the traditional form. In recent years they have been used in catalysis, photomagnetism, magnetooptics, drug delivery systems, medical diagnostics and cancer treatment [61,98]. Moreover, magnetic nanoparticles in the form of magnetite (Fe3O4) have unique properties that make them promising antimicrobial agents, especially that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found that superparamagnetic nanoparticles iron oxide (SPIONP) is biocompatible (BC) with the human body [99].
Recent development in the field of the modification of magnetic nanoparticles, in particular the use of RDRP [34,61,98,100,101,102,103,104], have led to the invention of recycling systems to ensure oil and water separation [98] or potential MRI contrast agent for preclinical and clinical imaging [103]. Such a wide variety of application potential of iron oxide nanoparticles with grafted polymer layers results in a constant interest of researchers, therefore, selected papers of the last decade on the above-mentioned topics will be presented in this subchapter.
Wang et al. [98] have developed pH-responsive magnetic nanoparticles for oil-water separation (Scheme 17). Well-defined recyclable stabilizers with core-shell structure consist of Fe3O4 magnetic core and PDMAEMA organic shell showed that MNPs with longer PDMAEMA arms exhibited broader suitable pH range to form Pickering emulsion, but slower magnetic responsiveness.
It is expected that this new conception of hybrid MNPs will prove to be a convenient and environmentally friendly way to separation of water contaminated with oil.
Another interesting example of using the magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles modified with SI-ATRP is magnetic sorting of macrophages [61].
To decorate MNPs with a cationic corona, at the beginning the bromine initiator was attached to the surface of the MNPs, and then the surface was modified with PDAMA by SI-ATRP (with 10,000 ppm of CuIBr/bpy) (Scheme 18). Subsequently tri-methylation greatly contributed to increase antigen payload on nanoparticles.
Macrophages incorporating ovalbumin (OVA)-loaded MNP was selected in magnetic fields and the cell population proved higher production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This suggests that OVA-loaded nanoparticles can potentially increase the efficiency of immune therapy during the antigen-presenting pathway.
Recently, poly(hydroxyethylmethacrylate) (PHEMA) and poly(methacrylic acid) (PMAA) were grafted from γ-Fe2O3 NPs according to Scheme 19 [34]. Superparamagnetic maghemite covered with different hydrophilic polymer layers was synthesized using surface initiated atomic transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP), leading to stable colloids in water. Ten-nm sized γ-Fe2O3 iron oxide NPs were modified using CuIBr/bpy as a catalyst (5100 and 3540 ppm of Cu species for HEMA and MAA, respectively). These synthesized nanomaterials provide biocompatible intelligent multifunctional nano-tools for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic hyperthermia and also magnetically stimulated drug release systems.
More recently, novel water-dispersible hybrid iron oxide nanoparticles grafted with a polymeric analogue of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were developed as a potential MRI contrast agents [103].
Superparamagnetic iron oxide with immobilized ATRP initiator was prepared by in situ method using 12-(2-bromoisobutyramido) dodecanoic acid (BiBADA). Then, the initiators for continuous activator regeneration atom transfer radical polymerization (ICAR) ATRP technique with 390 ppm of CuIIBr2/Me6TREN complex was applied to grafted poly(2-(methylsulfinyl)ethylacrylate) (PMSEA, a polyacrylate analogue of DMSO) brushes from nanoparticle surface [103]. A study on the biocompatibility of this new hybrid material confirmed the non-toxicity of molecules over a wide range of concentrations. Therefore, already small doses of newly developed nanoparticles are effective as non-toxic MRI contrast agents [103].
In 2018, polymer-Fe3O4 composite Janus nanoparticles were synthesized [101] to achieved a nanomaterial with promising thermal and magnetic properties. Scheme 20 depicts the synthesis of a polymer−Fe3O4 composite Janus NP by grafting a single chain. At first, chloromethylphenyl-group was prepared by ligand exchange with the hydrolyzed silane from the oleic acid capped NP. Following, a single chain of anionic living polystyrene was grafted onto the NPs surface by a rapid elimination of Cl from the NPs surface with Li anion of the polymer. Finally, thermo-responsive PNIPM brushes were grafted from the opposite side of NPs by SI-ATRP.
Shape and stability drops of emulsion of the obtained magnetomaterial can be manipulated in the magnetic field. As a result of the photo-thermal action of Fe3O4 NPs at NIR irradiation, the destabilization of the emulsion is caused by NIR irradiation at low ambient temperature. Hyperthermia of Fe3O4 NPs and fast transfer of thermal energy used to heating PNIPAM above LCST is the reason of observed interactive reaction of NPs [101].

5. Other Nanoparticles Modified with SI-ATRP

Apart from typical nanoparticles, over the most popular such as silica nanoparticles or the magnetic nanoparticles described in this review, in the literature there are reports of successful ATRP synthesis of hybrid nanomaterials containing zinc [39,105], cerium [106] or aluminium [107], titanium oxide [55] as a metallic core of core–shell structure. Surface of superparamagnetic cobalt nanoparticles [56], graphene oxide [108], or boron nitride nanosheets [109] were successfully functionalized with the ATRP approach in order to apply it in the fields of biomedical and thermal management in electronics.
Ding et al. [39] have focused on synthesis of polymer-tethered ZnO hybrid materials with three distinct approaches including among others “grafting-from” and “grafting-onto” methods. In “grafting from” approach, the initial stage of synthesis was to functionalize the surface of nanoparticles by attaching 2-BIB (Scheme 21). The (co)polymer brushes (PMMA or PMMA/P(S-co-AN)) were grafted from the surface of initiator-modified zinc oxide nanoparticles using CuIIBr2/Me6TREN as a catalyst complex (120 ppm) [39].
The “grafting-onto” method was based on PMMA/PSAN-b-PAA adsorption on the surface of the nanoparticle metallic core (50 and 200 ppm of CuIIBr2/Me6TREN for MMA and tBA polymerizations, respectively).
Both ATRP synthetic approaches resulted in ZnO NPs easily dispersed in organic solvents. However, gradual aggregation of nanoparticles in the solution indicates low grafting density of polymer brushes, which limited stabilization of the obtained nanoparticles [39].
Another interesting example of NPs modified by SI-ATRP with ppm of CuIBr/1,1,4,7,10,10-hexamethyltriethylenetetramine (HMTETA) complex is novel nanocomposites of poly(laurylmethacrylate)-grafted Al2O3 nanoparticles described by Sanchez et al. [107]. Authors synthesized nanomaterial by mixing the grafted NPs in an LDPE matrix in different ratios. As a result, obtained nanocomposite can be used in the production of newly designed dielectric materials with enhanced mechanical properties even at small amounts of inorganic filler.
Meanwhile Wu et al. [109] presented an unconventional idea to modify boron nitride nanosheets (BNNSs) by polyelectrolytes via activators regenerated by electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization (ARGET) ATRP with 4270 ppm of CuIBr/PMDETA catalyst approach was applied to grafted brushes of a typical polyelectrolyte such as poly 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate (PAMPS). Traditionally, a two-step “grafting from” approach has been applied, initially with the use of BiBB to functionalize the surface, followed by grafting of PAMPS brushes from BNNSs surfaces.
The layer of polyelectronlitic brushes synthesized on surface of BNNSs increased its dispersion in aqueous solvent, therefore authors expect that highly dispersed functional BNNSs/PAMPS composites can be used in biomedicine and thermal management in electronics [109].

6. Cellulose Nanocrystal Modified via SI-ATRP—Nature-Based Nanomaterials

In recent years, nanocellulose has been hailed as a wonderful material with flexibility and tensile strength greater than carbon fibers and steel [110,111]. Biodegradable raw material with an extremely low cost has proved to be a promising a natural material with high application potential. The nanocellulose crystals (CNC) issue has resulted in the publication of numerous papers presenting the effect of CNC modification using controlled radical polymerization in the last decade [112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120]. The use of the ATRP technique for a material that is CNC has enabled the control of the structure of grafted polymer chains leading to the acquisition of a well-defined nature-based nanomaterial.
Grishkewich et al. [113] modified the CNC surface with thermo-sensitive brushes of two analogues of poly(oligoethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate (POEGA) through SI-ATRP starting from the covalent connection of BiBB acting as the initiator of the polymerization process (Scheme 22). Copolymerization of di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (MEO2MA) and oligoethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate (OEGMA300) monomers from the surface in the presence of CuIBr/bpy catalytic complex (80,000 ppm) leads to a hybrid material with differentiated LCSTs.
Depending on the ratio of thermo-responsive monomers used for the synthesis of nanomaterial based on CNCs, the LCSTs values in aqueous medium can be adjusted [113]. In the CNC-g-POEGMA system, the content of MEO2MA and OEGMA300 affects the LCSTs value between 23.8 and 63.8 °C. Microstructural analysis of the material showed that below LCSTs, the polymer chains collapse into hydrophobic globules on the surface of CNCs, thus inducing the aggregation of nanoparticles [113]. Moreover, as a result of heating and cooling of the sample by means of cloud point measurements, hysteresis of the tested material was recorded. This hysteresis is attributed to an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the collapsed POEGMA chains and hydroxyl groups on cellulose nanocrystals [113].
Recently, modification of cellulose nanocrystal via SI-ATRP of styrene and the mechanism of its reinforcement of PMMA was presented [114]. The aim of the modification was to synthesize a bionanofiller for the production of nanocomposites with improved thermal and mechanical properties.
The addition of 1% CNC to PMMA and production of CNC/PMMA composite improves the strength to break and increases elongation at break, however, due to CNC aggregation the mechanical properties of the material deteriorate. Interestingly, addition of more than 1% of filler causes a decrease in tensile strength resulting from the concentration of stresses resulting from CNC aggregation. However, the comparison of elongation at break and tensile strength of PMMA composites and pure CNC is weaker than pure PMMA [114]. Finally, as a result of an application of the filler modified with ATRP technique, thermal stability, breaking strength and elongation at break of the PMMA/CNC composites were improved, and a composite with excellent transparency has been obtained.
In turn, Zhang et al. [118] reported on synthesis (according to Scheme 23) and developed a convenient method to characterize the grafted PS on the CNC surface by SI-ATRP (2000 ppm of Cu species) without cleaving the grafted polymers. SI-ATRP synthesis was carried out in DMF solvent in the presence of EBIB as a sacrificial initiator and the brominated CNC nano-initiator (CNC-Br) previously synthesized by CNC esterification with EBIB.
More recently, the comparative study on grafting polymers from cellulose nanocrystals via SI-ATRP and SI-ARGET ATRP was performed with the use of brominated macroinitiator and EBIB as the sacrificial initiator (Scheme 24). In the syntheses a 500-fold excess of monomer in relation to the initiator was applied to achieve high MW for grafted polymer brushes. The ARGET ATRP reaction was carried out in the presence of excess ascorbic acid as a reducing agent to ensure the continued regeneration of CuI of CuII. Therefore, the amount of Cu catalyst was reduced from 2000 ppm in ATRP to 25 ppm in ARGET ATRP [120].
The differences found with SI-ATRP and SI-ARGET ATRP from CNC-Br showed that the latter one promotes the grafting of longer polymer chains with lower grafting densities. Observed differences between applied approaches resulted from significantly lower catalyst concentration (25 ppm) and higher propagation in the SI-ARGET ATRP system [120].
Meanwhile, Morits et al. [116] used controlled SI-ATRP for grafting polymer brushes onto a more complex and partially disordered form of nanocellulose, namely nanofibres cellulose (CNFs). CNFs modification was carried out by grafting poly(n-butyl acrylate) and PDMAEMA brushes via SI-ATRP with 260 ppm of CuIIBr2/PMDETA catalytic complex. For both reaction first order kinetics indicated controlled polymerization up to chain lengths of DP = 800. Depending on the number of initiation sites on the surface of nanofibres, the differences in cellulose backbone behavior were observed. Interestingly, high density of grafted polymer brushes led to degradation of nanofibre backbone, while for brushes with moderate and lower grafting density the integrity of nanofibre structure was preserved [116].

7. Summary

As shown in this review paper, the continuous search for modern methods of obtaining well-defined organic–inorganic hybrids with a core–shell structure is an extremely important challenge with many application possibilities. The most frequently modified nanoparticles include Au, Si or magnetic (mainly iron oxides) described in more detail. The use of the SI-ATRP technique allowed for the synthesis of materials with predefined structure and predetermined properties, which enables to design innovative nanomaterials responding to the needs of modern nanotechnology or biomedicine. Nowadays, the rapid development of these research area offers a wide range of possibilities for the application of the ATRP approach. The new ARTP procedures with reduced concentration of the copper catalytic complex make this technique an even more attractive and environmentally friendly tool for the synthesis of precisely defined nanomaterials. The indicated examples of SI-ATRP application show its leading application in the synthesis of stimuli-responsive materials used e.g., drug delivery systems or temperature sensors used in microelectronics devices.

Funding

P.C. acknowledges Minister of Science and Higher Education scholarship for outstanding young scientists (0001/E-363/STYP/13/2018).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, J.S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Controlled living radical polymerization—Atom-transfer radical polymerization in the presence of transition-metal complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5614–5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chmielarz, P.; Pacześniak, T.; Rydel-Ciszek, K.; Zaborniak, I.; Biedka, P.; Sobkowiak, A. Synthesis of naturally-derived macromolecules through simplified electrochemically mediated ATRP. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 2466–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Yan, W.; Fantin, M.; Spencer, N.D.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Benetti, E.M. Translating surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization into technology: The mechanism of Cu0-mediated si-atrp under environmental conditions. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zaborniak, I.; Chmielarz, P. Temporally controlled ultrasonication-mediated atom transfer radical polymerization in miniemulsion. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1900285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Matyjaszewski, K. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): Current status and future perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 4015–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krys, P.; Matyjaszewski, K. Kinetics of atom transfer radical polymerization. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 89, 482–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chmielarz, P. Synthesis of naringin-based polymer brushes via seATRP. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, Y.; Lathwal, S.; Wang, Y.; Fu, L.; Olszewski, M.; Fantin, M.; Enciso, A.E.; Szczepaniak, G.; Das, S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Preparation of well-defined polymers and DNA–polymer bioconjugates via small-volume eATRP in the presence of air. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zaborniak, I.; Chmielarz, P.; Wolski, K.; Grzes’, G.; Isse, A.A.; Gennaro, A.; Zapotoczny, S.; Sobkowiak, A. Tannic acid-inspired star-like macromolecules via temporally controlled multi-step potential electrolysis. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1900073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fantin, M.; Lorandi, F.; Isse, A.A.; Gennaro, A. Sustainable electrochemically-mediated atom transfer radical polymerization with inexpensive non-platinum electrodes. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 37, 1318–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chmielarz, P.; Fantin, M.; Park, S.; Isse, A.A.; Gennaro, A.; Magenau, A.J.D.; Sobkowiak, A.; Matyjaszewski, K. Electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization (eATRP). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 69, 47–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chmielarz, P. Cellulose-based graft copolymers prepared by simplified electrochemically mediated ATRP. Express Polym. Lett. 2017, 11, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Matyjaszewski, K. Advanced materials by atom transfer radical polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. De Bon, F.; Isse, A.A.; Gennaro, A. Towards scale-up of electrochemically-mediated atom transfer radical polymerization: Use of a stainless-steel reactor as both cathode and reaction vessel. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 304, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dadashi-Silab, S.; Matyjaszewski, K. Iron-catalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization of semifluorinated methacrylates. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 1110–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, H.; Kabb, C.P.; Dai, Y.Q.; Hill, M.R.; Ghiviriga, I.; Bapat, A.P.; Sumerlin, B.S. Macromolecular metamorphosis via stimulus-induced transformations of polymer architecture. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yang, L.; Sun, H.; Liu, Y.; Hou, W.J.; Yang, Y.; Cai, R.; Cui, C.; Zhang, P.H.; Pan, X.S.; Li, X.W.; et al. Self-assembled aptamer-grafted hyperbranched polymer nanocarrier for targeted and photoresponsive drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 17048–17052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chmielarz, P.; Krys, P.; Wang, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.; Matyjaszewski, K. Synthesis of well-defined polymer brushes from silicon wafers via surface-initiated seATRP. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2017, 218, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zaborniak, I.; Chmielarz, P.; Matyjaszewski, K. Modification of wood-based materials by atom transfer radical polymerization methods. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 109253, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, S.; Chmielarz, P.; Gennaro, A.; Matyjaszewski, K. Simplified electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization using a sacrificial anode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 2388–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Williams, V.A.; Ribelli, T.G.; Chmielarz, P.; Park, S.; Matyjaszewski, K. A silver bullet: Elemental silver as an efficient reducing agent for atom transfer radical polymerization of acrylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1428–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chmielarz, P.; Sobkowiak, A. Ultralow ppm seATRP synthesis of PEO-b-PBA copolymers. J. Polym. Res. 2017, 24, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kwak, Y.; Magenau, A.J.D.; Matyjaszewski, K. ARGET ATRP of methyl acrylate with inexpensive ligands and ppm concentrations of catalyst. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saha, S.; Baker, G.L. Substituent effects in surface-initiated ATRP of substituted styrenes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 359, 911–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Chmielarz, P.; Park, S.; Simakova, A.; Matyjaszewski, K. Electrochemically mediated ATRP of acrylamides in water. Polymer 2015, 60, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chmielarz, P.; Krys, P.; Park, S.; Matyjaszewski, K. PEO-b-PNIPAM copolymers via SARA ATRP and eATRP in aqueous media. Polymer 2015, 71, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chmielarz, P. Synthesis of inositol-based star polymers through low ppm ATRP methods. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2017, 28, 1804–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Yan, J.; Liu, T.; Wei, Q.; Li, S.; Olszewski, M.; Wu, J.; Sobieski, J.; Fantin, M.; Bockstaller, M.R.; et al. Control of dispersity and grafting density of particle brushes by variation of ATRP catalyst concentration. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hui, C.M.; Pietrasik, J.; Schmitt, M.; Mahoney, C.; Choi, J.; Bockstaller, M.R.; Matyjaszewski, K. Surface-initiated polymerization as an enabling tool for multifunctional (nano-)engineered hybrid materials. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 745–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khabibullin, A.; Mastan, E.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Zhu, S.P. Surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. In Controlled Radical Polymerization at and from Solid Surfaces; Vana, P., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; Volume 270, pp. 29–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Matyjaszewski, K.; Dong, H.C.; Jakubowski, W.; Pietrasik, J.; Kusumo, A. Grafting from surfaces for “Everyone”: ARGET ATRP in the presence of air. Langmuir 2007, 23, 4528–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, D.P.; Gao, X.; Wang, W.J.; Zhu, S.P. Termination of surface radicals and kinetic modeling of ATRP grafting from flat surfaces by addition of deactivator. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1198–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chmielarz, P. Synthesis of α-D-glucose-based star polymers through simplified electrochemically mediated ATRP. Polymer 2016, 102, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Basti, H.; Ben Tahar, L.; Smiri, L.S.; Herbst, F.; Nowak, S.; Mangeney, C.; Ammar, S. Surface modification of gamma-Fe2O3 nanoparticles by grafting from poly-(hydroxyethylmethacrylate) and poly-(methacrylic acid): Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the polymeric coating. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 490, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chmielarz, P.; Yan, J.J.; Krys, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.Y.; Bockstaller, M.R.; Matyjaszewski, K. Synthesis of nanoparticle copolymer brushes via surface-initiated seATRP. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 4151–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Johnson, J.A.; Lu, Y.Y.; Burts, A.O.; Xia, Y.; Durrell, A.C.; Tirrell, D.A.; Grubbs, R.H. Drug-Loaded, Bivalent-bottle-brush polymers by graft-through ROMP. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 10326–10335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Roghani-Mamaqani, H.; Haddadi-Asl, V.; Khezri, K.; Salami-Kalajahi, M. Edge-functionalized graphene nanoplatelets with polystyrene by atom transfer radical polymerization: Grafting through carboxyl groups. Polym. Int. 2014, 63, 1912–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hobbs, C.E.; Vasireddy, M. Combining ATRP and ROMP with thio-bromo, copper-catalyzed, and strain-promoted click reactions for brush copolymer synthesis starting from a single initiator/monomer/click partner. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ding, H.J.; Yan, J.J.; Wang, Z.Y.; Xie, G.J.; Mahoney, C.; Ferebee, R.; Zhong, M.J.; Daniel, W.F.M.; Pietrasik, J.; Sheiko, S.S.; et al. Preparation of ZnO hybrid nanoparticles by ATRP. Polymer 2016, 107, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, X.; Li, S.R.; Wu, Y.X. Synthesis and characterization of poly(vinyl acetate)-g-polytetrahydrofuran graft copolymer with silver nanoparticles via combination of living cationic polymerization and grafting-onto approach. Acta Polym. Sin. 2017, 11, 1753–1761. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gadwal, I.; Wadgaonkar, P.P.; Ichake, A.B.; Mane, S.R. A New approach for the synthesis of miktoarm star polymers through a combination of thiol-epoxy “click” chemistry and ATRP/ring-opening polymerization techniques. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2019, 57, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Q.; Imbrogno, J.; Belfort, G.; Wang, X.L. Making polymeric membranes antifouling via “grafting from” polymerization of zwitterions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patil, R.R.; Turgman-Cohen, S.; Srogl, J.; Kiserow, D.; Genzer, J. On-demand degrafting and the study of molecular weight and grafting density of poly(methyl methacrylate) brushes on flat silica substrates. Langmuir 2015, 31, 2372–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pan, X.C.; Lathwal, S.; Mack, S.; Yan, J.J.; Das, S.R.; Matyjaszewski, K. Automated synthesis of well-defined polymers and biohybrids by atom transfer radical polymerization using a DNA synthesizer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2740–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cho, H.Y.; Krys, P.; Szczesniak, K.; Schroeder, H.; Park, S.; Jurga, S.; Buback, M.; Matyjaszewski, K. Synthesis of poly(OEOMA) using macromonomers via “grafting-through” ATRP. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 6385–6395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fazli, Y.; Kulani, E.; Khezri, K.; Alijani, H. PMMA-grafted silica aerogel nanoparticles via in situ SR&NI ATRP: Grafting through approach. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2015, 214, 70–79. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kolb, H.C.; Finn, M.G.; Sharpless, K.B. Click chemistry: Diverse chemical function from a few good reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Golas, P.L.; Matyjaszewski, K. Marrying click chemistry with polymerization: Expanding the scope of polymeric materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1338–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zhou, T.; Qi, H.; Han, L.; Barbash, D.; Li, C.Y. Towards controlled polymer brushes via a self-assembly-assisted-grafting-to approach. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mao, L.C.; Liu, X.H.; Liu, M.Y.; Huang, L.; Xu, D.Z.; Jiang, R.M.; Huang, Q.; Wen, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wei, Y. Surface grafting of zwitterionic polymers onto dye doped AIE-active luminescent silica nanoparticles through surface-initiated ATRP for biological imaging applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 419, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pamies, R.; Zhu, K.Z.; Kjoniksen, A.L.; Nystrom, B. Temperature effects on the stability of gold nanoparticles in the presence of a cationic thermoresponsive copolymer. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, H.S.; Son, Y.J.; Mao, W.; Leong, K.W.; Yoo, H.S. Atom transfer radical polymerization of multishelled cationic corona for the systemic delivery of siRNA. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Quinsaat, J.E.Q.; Nusch, F.A.; Hofmann, H.; Opris, D.M. Hydrophobization of silver nanoparticles through surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 44254–44260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, C.-N.; Xu, L.; Liu, Q.-D.; Zhang, W.; Jia, R.; Liu, C.-Z.; Wang, S.-S.; Wang, L.-P.; Li, G. Surface-induced ARGET ATRP for silicon nanoparticles with fluorescent polymer brushes. Polymers 2019, 11, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kopec, M.; Spanjers, J.; Scavo, E.; Ernens, D.; Duvigneau, J.; Vancso, G.J. Surface-initiated ATRP from polydopamine-modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 106, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tan, L.; Liu, B.; Siemensmeyer, K.; Glebe, U.; Boker, A. Synthesis of thermo-responsive nanocomposites of superparamagnetic cobalt nanoparticles/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 526, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Merlet, R.B.; Amirilargani, M.; de Smet, L.; Sudholter, E.J.R.; Nijmeijer, A.; Winnubst, L. Growing to shrink: Nano-tunable polystyrene brushes inside 5 nm mesopores. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 572, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Strozyk, M.S.; Chanana, M.; Pastoriza-Santos, I.; Perez-Juste, J.; Liz-Marzan, L.M. Protein/polymer-based dual-responsive gold nanoparticles with pH-dependent thermal sensitivity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1436–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Boyer, C.; Corrigan, N.A.; Jung, K.; Nguyen, D.; Nguyen, T.K.; Adnan, N.N.M.; Oliver, S.; Shanmugam, S.; Yeow, J. Copper-mediated living radical polymerization (atom transfer radical polymerization and copper(0) mediated polymerization): From fundamentals to bioapplications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 1803–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhou, T.; Zhu, Y.Z.; Li, X.; Liu, X.M.; Yeung, K.W.K.; Wu, S.L.; Wang, X.B.; Cui, Z.D.; Yang, X.J.; Chu, P.K. Surface functionalization of biomaterials by radical polymerization. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 83, 191–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kang, M.K.; Mao, W.; Yoo, H.S. Surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization of cationic corona on iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic sorting of macrophages. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 2248–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fristrup, C.J.; Jankova, K.; Hvilsted, S. Surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization—A technique to develop biofunctional coatings. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 4623–4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chakraborty, S.; Bishnoi, S.W.; Perez-Luna, V.H. Gold nanoparticles with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) formed via surface initiated atom transfer free radical polymerization exhibit unusually slow aggregation kinetics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 5947–5955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Song, L.L.; Qiao, Y.S.; Du, Y.X.; Li, Y.B. Shape control synthesis of polymeric hybrid nanoparticles via surface-initiated atom-transfer radical polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mu, B.; Shen, R.P.; Liu, P. Crosslinked polymeric nanocapsules from polymer brushes grafted silica nanoparticles via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Colloid Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, C.L.; Tassone, T.; Woodberry, K.; Sunday, D.; Green, D.L. Impact of ATRP initiator spacer length on grafting poly(methyl methacrylate) from silica nanoparticles. Langmuir 2009, 25, 13351–13360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Du, P.C.; Liu, P. Crosslinked polymeric nanocapsules via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization from SiO2 nano-templates. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 47, 1080–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yu, H.J.; Luo, Z.H. Silica/polystyrene and silica/polystyrene-b-polymethacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane hybrid nanoparticles via surface-initiated ATRP and comparison of their wettabilities. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2011, 51, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kirakosyan, A.; Kim, D.; Choi, J. Self-assembled polymer-grafted nanoparticles for photonic coating applications. Macromol. Res. 2016, 24, 1030–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, W.P.; Tang, J.Y.; Jia, Z.Q.; Li, X.X.; Xiao, Z.H. Grafting of amphiphilic polymers containing quaternary ammonium group on SiO2 surface via surface-initiated ATRP. J. Polym. Res. 2012, 19, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, J.R.; Lai, G.Q.; Yu, H.J.; Luo, Z.H. Synthesis and characterization of poly(γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane)-grafted silica hybrid nanoparticles prepared by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012, 124, 3821–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yu, F.Q.; Tang, X.D.; Pei, M.S. Facile synthesis of PDMAEMA-coated hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their pH-responsive controlled release. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 173, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Cui, H.Q.; Hu, J.; Cai, H.Y.; Deng, W.K. Fabrication of triple responsive polymer brushes and their catalytic performance after loading palladium. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 72444–72452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yin, J.; Zhou, J.C. Novel polyethersulfone hybrid ultrafiltration membrane prepared with SiO2-g-(PDMAEMA-co-PDMAPS) and its antifouling performances in oil-in-water emulsion application. Desalination 2015, 365, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Falireas, P.G.; Vamvakaki, M. pH-Responsive polyampholytic hybrid Janus nanoparticles. Polymer 2017, 130, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ataman, N.C.; Klok, H.A. Degrafting of poly(poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate) brushes from planar and spherical silicon substrates. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 9035–9047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huang, H.P.; Qu, J.; He, L. Amphiphilic silica/fluoropolymer nanoparticles: Synthesis, tem-responsive and surface properties as protein-resistance coatings. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhou, T.; Wang, B.B.; Dong, B.; Li, C.Y. Thermoresponsive amphiphilic janus silica nanoparticles via combining “polymer single-crystal templating” and “grafting-from” methods. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 8780–8789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Manivannan, K.; Huang, Y.S.; Huang, B.R.; Huang, C.F.; Chen, J.K. Real-time packing behavior of core-shell silica@poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microspheres as photonic crystals for visualizing in thermal sensing. Polymers 2016, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wu, L.; Glebe, U.; Boker, A. Synthesis of hybrid silica nanoparticles densely grafted with thermo and pH dual-responsive brushes via surface-initiated ATRP. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 9586–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, J.; Zhou, T.; Jia, L.; Shen, X.K.; Li, X.H.; Li, H.J.; Xu, Z.Q.; Cao, J.L. Generation and thermally adjustable catalysis of silver nanoparticle immobilized temperature-sensitive nanocomposite. J. Nanopart. Res. 2017, 19, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khabibullin, A.; Kopec, M.; Matyjaszewski, K. Modification of silica nanoparticles with miktoarm polymer brushes via ATRP. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2016, 26, 1292–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Penelas, M.J.; Contreras, C.B.; Giussi, J.M.; Wolosiuk, A.; Azzaroni, O.; Illia, G. Controlling dispersion, stability and polymer content on PDEGMA-functionalized core-brush silica colloids. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 574, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Park, J.T.; Seo, J.A.; Ahn, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, S.W. Surface modification of silica nanoparticles with hydrophilic polymers. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2010, 16, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhan, X.L.; Yan, Y.D.; Zhang, Q.H.; Chen, F.Q. A novel superhydrophobic hybrid nanocomposite material prepared by surface-initiated AGET ATRP and its anti-icing properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 9390–9399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liu, Y.J.; Wang, X.P.; Song, W.G.; Wang, G.W. Synthesis and characterization of silica nanoparticles functionalized with multiple TEMPO groups and investigation on their oxidation activity. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 7514–7523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, L.; Da, Y.M.; Ying, S.; Zheng, W.Q.; Zhang, X.Y.; Yu, X.H. Growth of silver nanoparticles on poly(acrylic acid) brushes and their properties. Polym. Bull. 2017, 74, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Król, P.; Chmielarz, P. Recent advances in ATRP methods in relation to the synthesis of copolymer coating materials. Prog. Org. Coat. 2014, 77, 913–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yao, X.; Song, Y.L.; Jiang, L. Applications of bio-inspired special wettable surfaces. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Deng, X.; Mammen, L.; Butt, H.J.; Vollmer, D. Candle soot as a template for a transparent robust superamphiphobic coating. Science 2012, 335, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, H.; Wang, H.X.; Niu, H.T.; Gestos, A.; Lin, T. Robust, self-healing superamphiphobic fabrics prepared by two-step coating of fluoro-containing polymer, fluoroalkyl silane, and modified silica nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1664–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sun, N.; Meng, X.J.; Xiao, Z.G. Functionalized Si3N4 nanoparticles modified with hydrophobic polymer chains by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 13830–13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pellegrino, T.; Manna, L.; Kudera, S.; Liedl, T.; Koktysh, D.; Rogach, A.L.; Keller, S.; Radler, J.; Natile, G.; Parak, W.J. Hydrophobic nanocrystals coated with an amphiphilic polymer shell: A general route to water soluble nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lin, C.A.J.; Sperling, R.A.; Li, J.K.; Yang, T.Y.; Li, P.Y.; Zanella, M.; Chang, W.H.; Parak, W.G.J. Design of an amphiphilic polymer for nanoparticle coating and functionalization. Small 2008, 4, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lai, H.; Lu, M.; Chen, F.; Lalevee, J.; Stenzel, M.H.; Xiao, P. Amphiphilic polymer coated nanodiamonds: A promising platform to deliver azonafide. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 1904–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schon, F.; Hartenstein, M.; Muller, A.H.E. New strategy for the synthesis of halogen-free acrylate macromonomers by atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 5394–5397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cai, Y.L.; Armes, S.P. Synthesis of well-defined Y-shaped zwitterionic block copolymers via atom-transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, X.F.; Shi, Y.; Graff, R.W.; Lee, D.; Gao, H.F. Developing recyclable pH-responsive magnetic nanoparticles for oil-water separation. Polymer 2015, 72, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lattuada, M.; Hatton, T.A. Functionalization of monodisperse magnetic nanoparticles. Langmuir 2007, 23, 2158–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mao, X.D.; Sun, H.Y.; He, X.W.; Chen, L.X.; Zhang, Y.K. Well-defined sulfamethazine-imprinted magnetic nanoparticles via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for highly selective enrichment of sulfonamides in food samples. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 4708–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yao, X.H.; Jing, J.Y.; Liang, F.X.; Yang, Z.Z. Polymer-Fe3O4 composite janus nanoparticles. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 9618–9625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Al Dine, E.J.; Ferjaoui, Z.; Roques-Carmes, T.; Schjen, A.; Meftah, A.; Hamieh, T.; Toufaily, J.; Schneider, R.; Gaffet, E.; Alem, H. Efficient synthetic access to thermoresponsive core/shell nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 8. [Google Scholar]
  103. Yan, J.J.; Li, S.P.; Cartieri, F.; Wang, Z.Y.; Hitchens, T.K.; Leonardo, J.; Averick, S.E.; Matyjaszewski, K. Iron oxide nanoparticles with grafted polymeric analogue of dimethyl sulfoxide as potential magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 21901–21908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gorka, W.; Kuciel, T.; Nalepa, P.; Lachowicz, D.; Zapotoczny, S.; Szuwarzynski, M. Homogeneous embedding of magnetic nanoparticles into polymer brushes during simultaneous surface-initiated polymerization. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, Z.Y.; Mahoney, C.; Yan, J.J.; Lu, Z.; Ferebee, R.; Luo, D.L.; Bockstaller, M.R.; Matyjaszewski, K. Preparation of well-defined poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)/ZnO hybrid nanoparticles by an efficient ligand exchange strategy. Langmuir 2016, 32, 13207–13213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Qiu, Y.; Rojas, E.; Murray, R.A.; Irigoyen, J.; Gregurec, D.; Castro-Hartmann, P.; Fledderman, J.; Estrela-Lopis, I.; Donath, E.; Moya, S.E. Cell uptake, intracellular distribution, fate and reactive oxygen species generation of polymer brush engineered CeO2−x NPs. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 6588–6598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sanchez, C.C.; Wahlander, M.; Taylor, N.; Fogelstrom, L.; Malmstrom, E. Novel Nanocomposites of poly(lauryl methacrylate)-grafted Al2O3 nanoparticles in LDPE. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25669–25678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Goncalves, G.; Marques, P.; Barros-Timmons, A.; Bdkin, I.; Singh, M.K.; Emami, N.; Gracio, J. Graphene oxide modified with PMMA via ATRP as a reinforcement filler. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 9927–9934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wu, Y.P.; Guo, M.L.; Liu, G.F.; Xue, S.S.; Xia, Y.M.; Liu, D.; Lei, W.W. Surface modification of boron nitride nanosheets by polyelectrolytes via atom transfer radical polymerization. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Brinchi, L.; Cotana, F.; Fortunati, E.; Kenny, J.M. Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Frone, A.N.; Berlioz, S.; Chailan, J.F.; Panaitescu, D.M. Morphology and thermal properties of PLA-cellulose nanofibers composites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 91, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hemraz, U.D.; Lu, A.; Sunasee, R.; Boluk, Y. Structure of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes and steric stability of their grafted cellulose nanocrystal dispersions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 430, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Grishkewich, N.; Akhlaghi, S.P.; Yao, Z.L.; Berry, R.; Tam, K.C. Cellulose nanocrystal-poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate) brushes with tunable LCSTsNathan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 144, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Yin, Y.; Tian, X.; Jiang, X.; Wang, H.; Gao, W. Modification of cellulose nanocrystal via SI-ATRP of styrene and the mechanism of its reinforcement of polymethylmethacrylate. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 142, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Malik, N.S.; Ahmad, M.; Minhas, M.U. Cross-linked beta-cyclodextrin and carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels for controlled drug delivery of acyclovir. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Morits, M.; McKee, J.R.; Majoinen, J.; Malho, J.M.; Houbenov, N.; Seitsonen, J.; Laine, J.; Groschel, A.H.; Ikkala, O. Polymer brushes on cellulose nanofibers: Modification, SI-ATRP, and unexpected degradation processes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 7642–7650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, Z.; Sebe, G.; Wang, X.S.; Tam, K.C. Gold nanoparticles stabilized by poly(4-vinylpyridine) grafted cellulose nanocrystals as efficient and recyclable catalysts. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 182, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, Z.; Tam, K.C.; Sebe, G.; Wang, X.S. Convenient characterization of polymers grafted on cellulose nanocrystals via SI-ATRP without chain cleavage. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 199, 603–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kedzior, S.A.; Zoppe, J.O.; Berry, R.M.; Cranston, E.D. Recent advances and an industrial perspective of cellulose nanocrystal functionalization through polymer grafting. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019, 23, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.S.; Tam, K.C.; Sebe, G. A comparative study on grafting polymers from cellulose nanocrystals via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and activator re-generated by electron transfer ATRP. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 205, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 03030 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration for ATRP and surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) technique. Reproduced with permission from reference [29].
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration for ATRP and surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP) technique. Reproduced with permission from reference [29].
Materials 12 03030 sch001
Materials 12 03030 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Schematic illustration for “grafting-from” approach employed to introduce polymer brushes onto the surface of a nanoparticle via SI-ATRP. Reproduced with permission from reference [30], 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Scheme 2. Schematic illustration for “grafting-from” approach employed to introduce polymer brushes onto the surface of a nanoparticle via SI-ATRP. Reproduced with permission from reference [30], 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Materials 12 03030 sch002
Materials 12 03030 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Schematic illustration for “grafting-through” approach for introduction of polymer brushes to the surface of NPs using SI-ATRP. Reproduced with permission from reference [30], 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Scheme 3. Schematic illustration for “grafting-through” approach for introduction of polymer brushes to the surface of NPs using SI-ATRP. Reproduced with permission from reference [30], 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Materials 12 03030 sch003
Materials 12 03030 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Schematic illustration for “grafting onto” approach using “click” chemistry. Reproduced with permission from reference [30], 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Scheme 4. Schematic illustration for “grafting onto” approach using “click” chemistry. Reproduced with permission from reference [30], 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
Materials 12 03030 sch004
Materials 12 03030 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Schematic illustration for the surface modification of gold nanoparticles. (A) Coupling of AEE to functionalized gold nanoparticles resulting in creation of a terminal hydroxyl group. (B) Preparation of initiator based on gold nanoparticles. (C) Polymerization of NIPAM from Au NPs through SI-ATRP approach. Reproduced with permission from reference [63].
Scheme 5. Schematic illustration for the surface modification of gold nanoparticles. (A) Coupling of AEE to functionalized gold nanoparticles resulting in creation of a terminal hydroxyl group. (B) Preparation of initiator based on gold nanoparticles. (C) Polymerization of NIPAM from Au NPs through SI-ATRP approach. Reproduced with permission from reference [63].
Materials 12 03030 sch005
Materials 12 03030 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM pictures of gold-polystyrene hybrid nanoparticle (molar ratio of Au NPs and disulfide initiator: (A) 1/100; (B) 1/1000; (C) 1/10,000; (D) 1/20,000. Reproduced with permission from reference [64].
Figure 1. TEM pictures of gold-polystyrene hybrid nanoparticle (molar ratio of Au NPs and disulfide initiator: (A) 1/100; (B) 1/1000; (C) 1/10,000; (D) 1/20,000. Reproduced with permission from reference [64].
Materials 12 03030 g001
Materials 12 03030 sch006 550
Scheme 6. (A) The scheme of preparing polymer multilayered gold nanoparticles via surface-initiated ATRP. (B) Schematic illustration for proposed anti-cancer effect of c-Myc siRNA incorporated AuNP and cellular uptake process. Reproduced with permission from reference [52], 2017, American Chemical Society.
Scheme 6. (A) The scheme of preparing polymer multilayered gold nanoparticles via surface-initiated ATRP. (B) Schematic illustration for proposed anti-cancer effect of c-Myc siRNA incorporated AuNP and cellular uptake process. Reproduced with permission from reference [52], 2017, American Chemical Society.
Materials 12 03030 sch006
Materials 12 03030 sch007 550
Scheme 7. Schematic illustration for formation of SiO2/PS-b-PMPTS nanoparticles via SI-ATRP. Reproduced with permission from reference [68].
Scheme 7. Schematic illustration for formation of SiO2/PS-b-PMPTS nanoparticles via SI-ATRP. Reproduced with permission from reference [68].
Materials 12 03030 sch007
Materials 12 03030 sch008 550
Scheme 8. Schematic illustration of general approaches to prepare the amino-functionalized, 2-bromoisobutyrate-functionalized and poly(BA-co-EFOA) grafted silica particles. Reproduced with permission from reference [85].
Scheme 8. Schematic illustration of general approaches to prepare the amino-functionalized, 2-bromoisobutyrate-functionalized and poly(BA-co-EFOA) grafted silica particles. Reproduced with permission from reference [85].
Materials 12 03030 sch008
Materials 12 03030 g002 550
Figure 2. Photographs of individual water droplets on glass with different coatings during the whole freezing process captured by a high-speed CCD camera. Reproduced with permission from reference [85].
Figure 2. Photographs of individual water droplets on glass with different coatings during the whole freezing process captured by a high-speed CCD camera. Reproduced with permission from reference [85].
Materials 12 03030 g002
Materials 12 03030 sch009 550
Scheme 9. Schematic illustration of LCST behavior of PCL-SiNPs-PNIPAM Janus particles in aqueous solution and SEM images (a–c) of the assembled structures of Janus nanoparticles in solution at corresponding temperatures. Reproduced with permission from reference [78].
Scheme 9. Schematic illustration of LCST behavior of PCL-SiNPs-PNIPAM Janus particles in aqueous solution and SEM images (a–c) of the assembled structures of Janus nanoparticles in solution at corresponding temperatures. Reproduced with permission from reference [78].
Materials 12 03030 sch009
Materials 12 03030 sch010 550
Scheme 10. Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure to receive SiNPs-g-PNIPAM-b-P4VP: (a) Immobilization of ATRP initiator, 3-(2-bromo-2-methyl) propionyloxylpropyl] trimethoxysilane (BPME), onto SNPs; (b) Synthesis of SNPs-g-PNIPAM via surface-initiated ATRP; and (c) Synthesis of SNPs-g-PNIPAM-b-P4VP by chain extension from SNPs-g-PNIPAM with 4VP. Reproduced with permission from reference [80].
Scheme 10. Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure to receive SiNPs-g-PNIPAM-b-P4VP: (a) Immobilization of ATRP initiator, 3-(2-bromo-2-methyl) propionyloxylpropyl] trimethoxysilane (BPME), onto SNPs; (b) Synthesis of SNPs-g-PNIPAM via surface-initiated ATRP; and (c) Synthesis of SNPs-g-PNIPAM-b-P4VP by chain extension from SNPs-g-PNIPAM with 4VP. Reproduced with permission from reference [80].
Materials 12 03030 sch010
Materials 12 03030 sch011 550
Scheme 11. Schematic illustration of surface-initiated ATRP of DEGMA on SiO2-Cl NPs. Reproduced with permission from reference [83]. VTES—vinyltriethoxysilane.
Scheme 11. Schematic illustration of surface-initiated ATRP of DEGMA on SiO2-Cl NPs. Reproduced with permission from reference [83]. VTES—vinyltriethoxysilane.
Materials 12 03030 sch011
Materials 12 03030 sch012 550
Scheme 12. Schematic illustration of the preparation process of crosslinked poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) (PHEA) nanocapsules. Reproduced with permission from reference [67].
Scheme 12. Schematic illustration of the preparation process of crosslinked poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylate) (PHEA) nanocapsules. Reproduced with permission from reference [67].
Materials 12 03030 sch012
Materials 12 03030 sch013 550
Scheme 13. Schematic illustration of synthesis route of SiO2-g-P(DMAEMA-Q) nanocomposites (Q denote quaternization of PDMAEMA) using 2-bromoisobutyratefunctionalized silica NPs prepared via two approaches including (A) modification of SiO2-NH2 nanoparticles in the presence of toluene and triethylamine, followed by BiBB (B) preparation of macroinitiators of SiO2 coated with APTES-BIBB. Reproduced with permission from reference [70].
Scheme 13. Schematic illustration of synthesis route of SiO2-g-P(DMAEMA-Q) nanocomposites (Q denote quaternization of PDMAEMA) using 2-bromoisobutyratefunctionalized silica NPs prepared via two approaches including (A) modification of SiO2-NH2 nanoparticles in the presence of toluene and triethylamine, followed by BiBB (B) preparation of macroinitiators of SiO2 coated with APTES-BIBB. Reproduced with permission from reference [70].
Materials 12 03030 sch013
Materials 12 03030 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM images of pristine SiO2 (a,b) and SiO2-g-P(DMAEMA-Q) (c,d). Reproduced with permission from reference [70].
Figure 3. SEM images of pristine SiO2 (a,b) and SiO2-g-P(DMAEMA-Q) (c,d). Reproduced with permission from reference [70].
Materials 12 03030 g003
Materials 12 03030 sch014 550
Scheme 14. Schematic illustration of preparation of PDMAEMA-modified HMSN. Reproduced with permission from reference [72].
Scheme 14. Schematic illustration of preparation of PDMAEMA-modified HMSN. Reproduced with permission from reference [72].
Materials 12 03030 sch014
Materials 12 03030 sch015 550
Scheme 15. Schematic illustration of synthesis route of SiO2-g-P(SPMA-co-DMAEMA). Reproduced with permission from reference [73].
Scheme 15. Schematic illustration of synthesis route of SiO2-g-P(SPMA-co-DMAEMA). Reproduced with permission from reference [73].
Materials 12 03030 sch015
Materials 12 03030 sch016 550
Scheme 16. Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure followed for the preparation of the Janus silica NPs bearing PtBA and PDMAEMA polymer brushes on their two opposite hemispheres. Reproduced with permission from reference [75].
Scheme 16. Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure followed for the preparation of the Janus silica NPs bearing PtBA and PDMAEMA polymer brushes on their two opposite hemispheres. Reproduced with permission from reference [75].
Materials 12 03030 sch016
Materials 12 03030 sch017 550
Scheme 17. Application of pH-responsive magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) as recyclable stabilizers for oil–water separation. Reproduced with permission from reference [98].
Scheme 17. Application of pH-responsive magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) as recyclable stabilizers for oil–water separation. Reproduced with permission from reference [98].
Materials 12 03030 sch017
Materials 12 03030 sch018 550
Scheme 18. Schematic illustration of surface-decoration of MNP to prepare tDAMA@MNPs for electrostatic adsorption of OVA. Reproduced with permission from reference [61].
Scheme 18. Schematic illustration of surface-decoration of MNP to prepare tDAMA@MNPs for electrostatic adsorption of OVA. Reproduced with permission from reference [61].
Materials 12 03030 sch018
Materials 12 03030 sch019 550
Scheme 19. Schematic illustration of NPs surface functionalization by PHEMA and PMAA polymer brushes. Reproduced with permission from reference [34].
Scheme 19. Schematic illustration of NPs surface functionalization by PHEMA and PMAA polymer brushes. Reproduced with permission from reference [34].
Materials 12 03030 sch019
Materials 12 03030 sch020 550
Scheme 20. Schematic illustration of synthesis of a polymer−Fe3O4 composite Janus NP by grafting single chains. Reproduced with permission from reference [101].
Scheme 20. Schematic illustration of synthesis of a polymer−Fe3O4 composite Janus NP by grafting single chains. Reproduced with permission from reference [101].
Materials 12 03030 sch020
Materials 12 03030 sch021 550
Scheme 21. Schematic illustration of synthesis of polymer brush grafted ZnO NPs by “grafting-from” method. Reproduced with permission from reference [39].
Scheme 21. Schematic illustration of synthesis of polymer brush grafted ZnO NPs by “grafting-from” method. Reproduced with permission from reference [39].
Materials 12 03030 sch021
Materials 12 03030 sch022 550
Scheme 22. Synthesis of cellulose nanocrystal-graft-poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate) (CNC-g-POEGMA) (A) synthesis of macro-initiator CNC (B) grafting of MEO2MA:OEGMA300 onto surface of modified CNC. Reproduced with permission from reference [113].
Scheme 22. Synthesis of cellulose nanocrystal-graft-poly(oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylate) (CNC-g-POEGMA) (A) synthesis of macro-initiator CNC (B) grafting of MEO2MA:OEGMA300 onto surface of modified CNC. Reproduced with permission from reference [113].
Materials 12 03030 sch022
Materials 12 03030 sch023 550
Scheme 23. Synthetic route used for the preparation of the PS-g-CNC and free PS. Reproduced with permission from reference [118].
Scheme 23. Synthetic route used for the preparation of the PS-g-CNC and free PS. Reproduced with permission from reference [118].
Materials 12 03030 sch023
Materials 12 03030 sch024 550
Scheme 24. Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism to account for the differences found with SI-ATRP and SI-ARGET ATRP from CNC-Br. Reproduced with permission from reference [120].
Scheme 24. Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism to account for the differences found with SI-ATRP and SI-ARGET ATRP from CNC-Br. Reproduced with permission from reference [120].
Materials 12 03030 sch024

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Flejszar, M.; Chmielarz, P. Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization for the Preparation of Well-Defined Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanomaterials. Materials 2019, 12, 3030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183030

AMA Style

Flejszar M, Chmielarz P. Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization for the Preparation of Well-Defined Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanomaterials. Materials. 2019; 12(18):3030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Flejszar, Monika, and Paweł Chmielarz. 2019. "Surface-Initiated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization for the Preparation of Well-Defined Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanomaterials" Materials 12, no. 18: 3030. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop