Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of Multi-mode Fiber Laser Cutting of Cement Mortar
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Ultrasound in Reconditioning by Welding of Tools Used in the Process of Regenerating Rubber
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Materials 2018, 11(2), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11020277

Experimental Investigations on Subsequent Yield Surface of Pure Copper by Single-Sample and Multi-Sample Methods under Various Pre-Deformation

1
Key Lab of Disaster Prevent and Structural Safety, Guangxi Key Lab Disaster Prevent and Engineering Safety, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University; Nanning 530004, China
2
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 January 2018 / Revised: 1 February 2018 / Accepted: 5 February 2018 / Published: 10 February 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [5149 KB, uploaded 10 February 2018]   |  

Abstract

Using copper thin-walled tubular specimens, the subsequent yield surfaces under pre-tension, pre-torsion and pre-combined tension-torsion are measured, where the single-sample and multi-sample methods are applied respectively to determine the yield stresses at specified offset strain. The rule and characteristics of the evolution of the subsequent yield surface are investigated. Under the conditions of different pre-strains, the influence of test point number, test sequence and specified offset strain on the measurement of subsequent yield surface and the concave phenomenon for measured yield surface are studied. Moreover, the feasibility and validity of the two methods are compared. The main conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) For the single or multi-sample method, the measured subsequent yield surfaces are remarkably different from cylindrical yield surfaces proposed by the classical plasticity theory; (2) there are apparent differences between the test results from the two kinds of methods: the multi-sample method is not influenced by the number of test points, test order and the cumulative effect of residual plastic strain resulting from the other test point, while those are very influential in the single-sample method; and (3) the measured subsequent yield surface may appear concave, which can be transformed to convex for single-sample method by changing the test sequence. However, for the multiple-sample method, the concave phenomenon will disappear when a larger offset strain is specified. View Full-Text
Keywords: pure copper; subsequent yield measurement; pre-strain; concave pure copper; subsequent yield measurement; pre-strain; concave
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, G.-L.; Huang, S.-H.; Shi, C.-S.; Zeng, B.; Zhang, K.-S.; Zhong, X.-C. Experimental Investigations on Subsequent Yield Surface of Pure Copper by Single-Sample and Multi-Sample Methods under Various Pre-Deformation. Materials 2018, 11, 277.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Materials EISSN 1996-1944 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top