Next Article in Journal
Assembly Modulated by Particle Position and Shape: A New Concept in Self-Assembly
Previous Article in Journal
Salt-Assisted Ultrasonicated De-Aggregation and Advanced Redox Electrochemistry of Detonation Nanodiamond
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/ma10111293
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy

by
Jialong Tian
1,2,
Wei Wang
2,*,
M. Babar Shahzad
2,
Wei Yan
2,
Yiyin Shan
2,
Zhouhua Jiang
3 and
Ke Yang
2
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
2
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
3
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(11), 1293; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111293
Submission received: 17 October 2017 / Revised: 29 October 2017 / Accepted: 8 November 2017 / Published: 10 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Materials Characterization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new maraging stainless steel with superior strength–toughness–corrosion synergy has been developed based on an innovative concept of alloy design. The high strength–toughness combination is achieved by forming dispersive nano-sized intermetallic compounds in the soft lath martensitic matrix with a slight amount of residual austenite. The good corrosion resistance is guaranteed by exactly controlling the Co content based on understanding the synergistic effect between Co and Cr. The fine structure characteristics of two dominant strengthening precipitations including Ni3Ti and Mo-rich phases were finely characterized associated with transmission electron microscope (TEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) analyses. The relationship among microstructure, strength and toughness is discussed. The precipitation mechanism of different precipitates in the new maraging stainless steel is revealed based on the APT analysis.

1. Introduction

Maraging stainless steels (MSS) are a class of high strength stainless steels with excellent comprehensive performances including high strength, superior corrosion resistance and good weldability, etc. [1,2,3,4,5]. Since the first maraging stainless steel was developed by Carnegie Illionois Steel Corporation in 1946 to meet military demands, many efforts have been successfully realized to improve its performance [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Nowadays, new maraging stainless steel, as an important candidate material to ensure the lower energy consumptions and pollution reduction owing to its unique combination of properties including high strength, high toughness and superior corrosion resistance, is attracting much greater attention. However, a significant bottleneck that hinders the future applications of maraging stainless steels as potential structural materials is the trade-off dilemma among their strength, fracture toughness and corrosion resistance.
As far as the strength of MSS is considered, different methods have been tried to increase their strength, such as multiple-phase strengthening [1,2,3], co-precipitation of nano-scale particles [7,8], and minimal lattice misfit between matrix and precipitate [13]. Meanwhile, attentions have been concentrated on characterizing the relationship between strength and precipitate, for instances, the lattice structure, orientation relationship and evolution process during aging treatment. Besides the strength of MSS, corrosion resistance is another important and particularly critical property for future applications, because more and more materials will be subjected to extreme mechanical loads and harsh environmental conditions where corrosion is an important issue. Unfortunately, MSS with high strength is always accompanied with a loss in toughness or corrosion resistance. In general, two methods are usually considered to increase the strength of MSS. One is to add carbon (C) to strengthen the lath martensitic matrix. However, higher content of C could present a gradual incremental trend to form chromium carbides, which are harmful for both toughness and corrosion resistance [15,16]. Another method is to add more strengthening elements to increase the strength by precipitation hardening. However, most strengthening elements such as Mo, Ti and Al are also ferrite formation elements and they will promote the formation of delta-ferrite, which is harmful to the toughness. Different from those strengthening elements, Co is often added to increase the strength of maraging stainless steel by its synergistic effect with strengthening elements such as Ti and Mo [11,12,13,14]. However, Co also accelerates the spinodal decomposition of Cr atoms during the aging process, which could deteriorate the corrosion resistance [17].
In this study, a new maraging stainless steel, defined as “IMR steel” (Steel from the Institute of Metal Research), was developed based on an innovative concept of synergistic effect of multiple elements in maraging stainless steels. The microstructure of quenched IMR steel was comprised of soft lath martensitic and residual austenite. In the subsequent aging process, large amounts of nano-sized intermetallic compounds precipitate in the matrix. The IMR steel exerts a high strength in combination with high toughness and good corrosion resistance, showing outstanding performance compared with other commercial maraging stainless steels. It is expected that the new maraging steel will have potential applications in the aircraft, power generation, tools and automotive industries.

2. Alloy Design

According to the conventional “stainless theory”, it is generally believed that Cr must be added to above 11 wt % to impart “stainlessness” to steels. At this Cr level, an adherent and self-healing chromium oxide can be formed on the steel surface in the relatively benign corrosive environment, especially with 13 wt % Cr addition in steel, and superior corrosion resistance could be achieved [18]. Thus, the Cr content has been set as 13 wt % to guarantee a superior corrosion resistance.
Co is a key element in maraging stainless steel since it controls the balance between strength and corrosion resistance. According to previous research [17], when Co content was 13 wt %, the MSS showed a poor corrosion resistance even with 13 wt % Cr addition. When Co content was decreased to 7 wt %, the MSS showed a good corrosion resistance in 3.5% NaCl solution. Thus, the Co content has been set as 7 wt % to achieve the balance between strength and corrosion resistance.
Ti is the most effective strengthening element in maraging stainless steels. In order to reach a strength target of 1900 MPa, Ti content has been set as 1.7 wt %. Considering that the co-addition of Mo and Ti could form a core-shell structure [2] that is good for both strength and toughness, Mo content is set as 3 wt %. Although Mo is good for both strength and corrosion resistance, more Mo addition is infeasible considering the occurrence of delta-ferrite.
The role of Ni in maraging stainless steel is crucial. On the one hand, Ni could enlarge the austenite region and avoid delta-ferrite formation during cooling via austenite phase field extension. On the other hand, Ni could form the intermetallic phase, especially form η-Ni3Ti which is the dominant strengthening precipitate in the Ti-alloyed maraging stainless steels. Also, Ni content should be designed precisely to control the volume fraction of residual austenite that is important for both strength and toughness. Ni content in the IMR steel is designed to be 7.5 wt %.
Finally, in order to guarantee the high fracture toughness, impurities such as C, O and N should be kept less than 30 ppm, respectively. Based on the above alloy design analyses, the nominal composition of the IMR steel is designed to be (wt %) Cr 13.0%, Ni 7.5%, Co 7.0%, Mo 3.0% and Ti 1.7%.

3. Experimental Details

The IMR steel was first melted in a 25 kg vacuum induction melting furnace and then remelted by vacuum arc melting. Fe, Cr, Ni, Co, Mo and Ti were added in the form of high purity metals (>99.99%) to obtain a super-clean steel. Chemical composition of the steel analyzed by ICP (inductively coupled plasma) is shown in Table 1. Casting ingot with a diameter of 100 mm was homogenized at 1200 °C for 48 h and then forged into square bars (20 mm × 20 mm). Specimens for tests and microstructure characterizations were subjected to solution annealing at 1050 °C for 1 h followed by cryogenic treatment (CT) in liquid nitrogen for 8 h. Finally, aging treatment (AT) with different holding time (10 min, 0.5 h, 4 h, 16 h, 40 h, 100 h) was performed at 480 °C. Other commercial maraging stainless steels were taken from the steel enterprise and were peak aging (PA) treated to reach its highest strength. Afterwards, corrosion current density of all steels has been tested. Mechanical property (fracture toughness and ultimate tensile strength) of three steels (IMR steel, 1RK91 and Custom 475) were tested practically and other steels’ mechanical property was taken from the references. In order to guarantee the reliability, three samples have been tested to get the average.
TEM characterization was conducted using a JEM 2100 transmission microscope (Japan Electron Optical Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 200 kV. Thin TEM foils were prepared with care for a large electron transparent area and minimum magnetic influence. 3 mm diameter discs were first mechanically polished to 50 μm and then jet electropolished in a bath containing 10 vol % HClO4 + 90 vol % C2H5OH at −20 °C. Needle-shaped specimens required for APT were prepared by a standard two-step electro-polishing technique. Local electrode atom probe (LEAP) acquisitions were accomplished using a LEAP™ 3000HR under an ultrahigh vacuum of ~1 × 10−8 Pa at a base temperature of 60 K with a pulse frequency of 200 kHz and a 20% pulse fraction. Imago Visualization and Analysis Software (IVAS) version 3.6.2 was used for data reconstruction, composition analysis and the creation of iso-concentration surface.
Tensile tests were conducted according to ASTM E8 on an AG-100KG testing machine (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at a strain rate of 2.0 × 10−3 s−1 at room temperature. Fracture toughness measurements were performed on a SCHENCK-100KN fatigue test machine (Schenck Process GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) according to ASTM E399 at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Potentiodynamic polarization (PDP) tests in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution were conducted using a PARSTAT4000 electrochemical workstation (Princeton Applied Research, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) with a scan rate of 0.1667 mV/s. The surface area of the working electrodes was reduced to 1.0 cm2 using epoxy resin, in order to avoid the edge effect. A conventional three-electrode (reference, counter and working electrodes) electrochemical cell was used in this study.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Microstructure and Properties

Figure 1 shows the fracture toughness, corrosion resistance and ultimate tensile strength of the IMR steel in comparison with some typical commercial maraging stainless steels. Compared with the commercial maraging stainless steels, IMR steel shows a higher ultimate tensile strength (1920 MPa) which is slightly lower than that of Custom 475 (2000 MPa). In addition to strength, two other critical properties of maraging stainless steels are fracture toughness and corrosion resistance. The corrosion current density obtained from PDP scans was used as an indicator of corrosion resistance. It can be seen clearly that 17-4 PH shows the most outstanding corrosion resistance, which could be attributed to its higher chromium content (~17 wt %). In comparison, IMR steel shows an equivalent corrosion resistance to that of 15-5 PH. Moreover, fracture toughness of IMR steel shows notable advantage compared to those maraging stainless steels. In general, strength and toughness show an inverse variation trend and it is difficult to improve both simultaneously. However, IMR steel exhibited both high toughness and superior strength, which could be attributed to its unique microstructure.
Figure 2a is a bright field TEM image of the specimen after cryogenic treatment (CT). Typical martensitic lath is clearly visible while high density dislocations can be found as shown in Figure 2b. The high-density dislocations in the matrix can offer preferred nucleation sites and lead to the formation of dispersive precipitates in the following aging process [24,25]. Two types of strengthening precipitates were found in the peak-aged specimen as shown in Figure 2c. According to the high-resolution TEM image (Figure 2(d1,d2)) and the corresponding FFT pattern (Figure 2(d3,d4)), the sphere-like precipitates and rod-like precipitates are identified as Mo-rich phase and Ni3Ti phase, respectively.
As a powerful technique to characterize the nano-sized precipitates, atom probe tomography (APT) is characteristic for its near-atomic spatial resolution and can offer the information of the precipitations such as composition, spatial morphology, size, number density, etc., which is beyond the scope of TEM analysis. In this study, regions that contain more than 10 at % Mo and 35 at % Ni + Ti are defined as Mo-rich phase and Ni3Ti phase, respectively. Figure 3a shows the 3-D reconstruction of the atomic positions of Fe (pink points), isoconcentration surface for regions containing more than 10 at % Mo (red surfaces) and 35 at % Ni + Ti (green surfaces). A careful observation of two types of precipitates revealed that each precipitate has two different shapes, sphere-like Mo-rich phase and bar-like Ni3Ti phase, as shown in Figure 3b,c, which were also observed by TEM. Meanwhile, Mo-rich phase and Ni3Ti phase have another two refined structures which were not observed by TEM. As shown in Figure 3d,e, a ring-like Mo-rich phase and sphere-like Ni3Ti phase can be observed. It is believed that small sphere-like Ni3Ti phases were formed at the beginning stage of aging treatment and, due to lack of time or hindrance of phase interface, they could not grow to big rod-like precipitates. On the contrary, those with the minimal interface energy between Ni3Ti and matrix grew and finally formed rod-like Ni3Ti precipitates. In case of Mo-rich phase, except for sphere-like precipitates, ring-like precipitates were also observed located at the interface between Ni3Ti and matrix. The corresponding 1-D concentration profile and atomic maps within a selected region crossing the Ni3Ti/matrix interface are shown in Figure 4. The region between the two dashed lines corresponds to the Mo-rich phase with thickness of about 5 nm. The results indicate that Mo-rich phase is more likely to nucleate at the Ni3Ti/matrix interface, and its forming mechanism will be discussed later.
The good combination of strength and toughness for the IMR steel can be attributed to the following two aspects. First, since Ti precipitates most rapidly, strongly and completely during aging in the maraging stainless steel [26], Ni3Ti precipitates make a dominant contribution to the strength. Meanwhile, Mo-rich phase retards the growth of Ni3Ti precipitates through its accumulation at the interface [1]. Thus, Mo-rich phase could promote the maintenance of highly dispersive Ni3Ti nano-precipitates and enhance the strengthening effect of Ni3Ti precipitates. Second, the highly uniform distribution of Ni3Ti precipitates effectively reduces stress concentration. In addition, Mo-rich phase at the interface results in a small lattice misfit between Ni3Ti and matrix [1]. Thus, the associated elastic interaction between precipitate and dislocation should be lowered. Therefore, the core-shell structure effectively prevents the crack initiation at the precipitate-matrix interface owing to the negligible strain accumulation and thus guarantees a good combination of strength and toughness.

4.2. Precipitation Mechanism of Ni3Ti and Mo-Rich Precipitates

APT was used to further characterize the evolution of three elements (Ni, Ti, Mo) during the aging treatment, and Figure 5 shows the visual atomic position reconstruction. It can be seen clearly that Ni and Ti show similar distribution positions, which indicates that Ni and Ti form clusters together whereas Mo forms cluster separately. Maximum separation envelope methodology (MSEM) was used to further analyze the precipitate kinetics of different clusters. In this method, the spherical volume region around the selected atoms, as defined by a maximum separation distance, dmax, is searched for any other selected solute atoms. The minimum solute atoms number (Nmin) threshold parameter was used to limit the size of the solute clusters to those more than the threshold value. The cluster numbers were counted based on specific parameters (dmax and Nmin) and the cluster density was defined as the ratio of cluster number over the volume of analyzed body. Table 2 shows the statistical results about the clusters density under different aging condition based on the MSEM.
Both cluster analysis results in Table 2 and atomic positions reconstruction in Figure 5a indicate that no cluster exists in the steel matrix after CT. When aging time was 10 min, Ni and Ti clusters occurred as shown in Figure 5(b1,b2), and the cluster density of Ni + Ti reached 59.92 × 10−5 nm−3 as shown in Table 2. However, no Mo cluster formed after 10 min according to the cluster analysis results. Cluster density of Ni + Ti cluster reached to maximum (116.78 × 10−5 nm−3) after aging for 0.5 h, and with increase of aging time, cluster density decreased slightly as a result of the aggregation and growth of Ni3Ti precipitates. According to the cluster analysis results of Mo in Table 2, it can be found that Mo cluster density only reached to 0.26 × 10−5 nm−3 even after aging for 4 h. Meanwhile, no obvious cluster was observed in the atomic reconstruction (Figure 5(d3)). The maximum value of Mo cluster density was 51.52 × 10−5 nm−3 after aging for 16 h.
The results indicate that Ni and Ti showed much quicker aging response than Mo at the early aging stage. Considering the diffusion coefficients of the portioning elements (Ni, Ti, Mo, Fe) in the α-Fe matrix [27,28,29], the diffusivity of Mo is much lower than that of the other elements. This indicates that Mo acts as a kinetically controlling element for the precipitation process, as revealed by the fact that Mo is rejected from the precipitate into the matrix, accumulating before the Ni3Ti/matrix interface.
Figure 6 shows the distribution characteristics of Ni3Ti phase outlined by green Ni + Ti 35 at % isoconcentration surface and Mo-rich phase outlined by red Mo 5 at % isoconcentration surface at different aging stages. When the aging time was 0.5 h, sphere-like Ni3Ti particles are evident, as shown in Figure 6b. When the aging time extended, a further growth of particles seems to occur, and their average diameter also increases. But the evolution of Mo-rich phase was different, as no Mo 5 at % isoconcentration surface was detected in the specimen aged for 4 h, as shown in Figure 6c, which could be attributed to a low Mo concentration at Ni3Ti/matrix interface. According to the proximity histogram analysis shown in Figure 7a, the Mo concentration at Ni3Ti/matrix interface approximates to the average concentration of Mo in the matrix (1.58 at %). When aging time prolonged to 40 h (Figure 7b) and 100 h (Figure 7c), the Mo concentration at Ni3Ti/matrix interface increases to 2.09 at % and 3.06 at %, respectively.
Since the diffusivity of Mo is much lower than those of Ni and Ti, this indicates that Ni3Ti nucleates headmost and will seize most prior nucleation sites such as grain boundary, blocky/lath boundary and dislocation. Considering that these defects are also favorable diffusion paths, a low nucleation rate of Mo-rich phase can be predicted. This well explains the larger size and lower number density Mo-rich phase. As shown in Figure 3a, the dimension of sphere-like Mo-rich phase is almost similar to the cross section (~50 × 50 nm2) of the APT analytical body. Attributed to the size limitation of APT analytical body, sphere-like Mo-rich phase was not included in the analytical body, as shown in Figure 6d,e. This also results in an anomaly phenomenon in Table 2 that Mo cluster density had a sharp decrease after aging time reached to 40 h and 100 h.
Based on the above characterization on the formation and evolution of the Ni3Ti and Mo-rich phases, the precipitation mechanism in the new maraging stainless steel can be revealed as follows and schematically illustrated in Figure 8. At the initial stage of aging, Ni and Ti firstly precipitate out of the supersaturated solid solution to form Ni + Ti cluster together. During the rapid initial growth process of Ni3Ti, Mo solutes are rejected from Ni3Ti and finally segregate at the Ni3Ti/matrix interface. Since the precipitation of Ni3Ti has seized most prior nucleation sites and favorable diffusion paths, such as grain boundary, blocky/lath boundary and dislocation, Mo-rich phase is inclined to nucleate at the Ni3Ti/matrix interface as a result of Mo atoms accumulation. After stable Mo-rich phase nucleation occurs, considering that the diffusion of Mo is difficult, most nuclei grow up slightly to form final flake-like Mo-rich phase adjacent to Ni3Ti phase. Thus, the flake-like Mo-rich phase and Ni3Ti phase form a core-shell structure together. In different sites, portion of nucleus grow up drastically to form large size sphere-like Mo-rich phase and even build a crosslink to each other.

5. Conclusions

This study presents an understanding of the mechanism of the evolution of precipitation in a new maraging stainless steel. The features of different kind of precipitations are carefully characterized at atomic scale based on combination of APT and TEM analyses. The following conclusions are drawn from the study:
A new maraging stainless steel with high strength (above 1920 MPa), high toughness (~80 MPa·m1/2) and superior corrosion resistance (comparable to 15-5 PH) was developed. The new maraging stainless steel is strengthened by two dominant strengthening precipitations including Ni3Ti and Mo-rich phases. Different morphologies of these two strengthening precipitates (rod-like and sphere-like Ni3Ti phase, flake-like and sphere-like Mo-rich phase) were observed by APT.
In the aging process, Ni and Ti solutes show a much quicker precipitation response than Mo solute. Associated with morphology observation and cluster analysis, the precipitation mechanism is succinctly proposed as: supersaturated solid solution → Ni + Ti cluster → Ni3Ti nucleus → Ni3Ti nucleus and Mo-rich segregation → core-shell structure (Ni3Ti phase and flake-like Mo-rich phase) or large sphere-like Mo-rich phase depending on the grow up process of Mo-rich nucleus.

Acknowledgments

This research is sponsored by Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017233), Innovation Project of Institute of Metal Research (2015-ZD04) and National Natural Science Foundation of China Research Fund for International Young Scientists (No. 51750110515). We acknowledge Wenqing Liu for APT experiment support and relevant discussion on the data analysis.

Author Contributions

Ke Yang, Zhouhua Jiang and Yiyin Shan designed the project. Wei Yan, M. Babar Shahzad and Wei Wang produced the samples used in this study. Jialong Tian peformed the microstructural analyses and the properties test. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and the writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.J.; Chen, H.G.; Yao, M.J.; Gault, B.; Ponge, D.; Raabe, D.; Hirata, A.; et al. Ultrastrong steel via minimal lattice misfit and high-density nanoprecipitation. Nature 2017, 544, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, Y.C.; Yan, W.; Cotton, J.D.; Ryan, G.J.; Shen, Y.F.; Wang, W.; Shan, Y.Y.; Yang, K. A new 1.9 GPa maraging stainless steel strengthened by multiple precipitating species. Mater. Des. 2015, 82, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, W.; Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, P.E.J.; Yan, W.; Yang, K.; Martín, D.S.; Kestens, L.A.I.; van der Zwaag, S. A new ultrahigh-strength stainless steel strengthened by various coexisting nanoprecipitates. Acta Mater. 2010, 58, 4067–4075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Liu, Z.B.; Liang, J.X.; Zhang, X.L.; Yang, Z.Y.; Sun, G.Q. The development and application of high-performance ultra-high strength stainless steel subject to marine environment. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 783–786, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, Z.; Sha, W.; Vaumousse, D. Microstructural evolution in a PH13-8 stainless steel after ageing. Acta Mater. 2003, 51, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hättestrand, M.; Nilsson, J.O.; Stiller, K.; Liu, P.; Andersson, M. Precipitation hardening in a 12%–9%Ni-4%Mo-2%Cu stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 1023–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jiao, Z.B.; Luan, J.H.; Miller, M.K.; Liu, C.T. Precipitation mechanism and mechanical properties of an ultra-high strength steel hardened by nanoscale NiAl and Cu particles. Atca Mater. 2015, 97, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murthy, A.S.; Medvedeva, J.E.; Isheim, D.; Lekakh, S.L.; Richards, V.L.; Van Aken, D.C. Copper precipitation in cobalt-alloyed precipitation-hardened stainless steel. Scr. Mater. 2012, 66, 943–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leitner, H.; Schnitzer, R.; Schober, M.; Zinner, S. Precipitate modification in PH13-8 Mo type maraging steel. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 5012–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murayama, M.; Katayama, Y.; Hono, K. Microstructural evolution in a 17-4 PH stainless steel after aging at 400 °C. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1999, 30A, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Speich, G.R.; Dabkowski, D.S.; Porter, L.F. Strength and toughness of Fe-10Ni alloys containing C, Cr, Mo, and Co. Metall. Trans. 1973, 4, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Squires, D.R.; Wilson, F.G.; Wilson, E.A. The influence of Mo and Co on the embrittlement of an Fe-Ni-Mn alloy. Metall. Trans. 1974, 5, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kwon, H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, K.B.; Kwon, H.; Kim, C.M.; Yang, H.R. Effects of Co and Ni on secondary hardening and fracture behavior of martensitic steels bearing W and Cr. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1998, 29, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kwon, H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, K.B.; Kwon, H.; Kim, C.M.; Yang, H.R. Effect of alloying additions on secondary hardening behavior of mo-containing steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 1997, 28, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakamichi, H.; Sato, K.; Miyata, Y.; Kimura, M.; Masamura, K. Quantitative analysis of Cr-depleted zone morphology in low carbon martensitic stainless steel using Fe-(S)TEM. Corros. Sci. 2008, 50, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, X.; Wang, L.; Subramanian, S.V.; Liu, C. Studies on Nb microalloying of 13Cr super martensitic stainless steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2012, 43A, 4475–4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tian, J.L.; Wang, W.; Yin, L.C.; Yan, W.; Shan, Y.Y.; Yang, K. Three dimensional atom probe and first-principles studies on spinodal decomposition of Cr in a Co-Alloyed maraging stainless steel. Scr. Mater. 2016, 121, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lo, K.H.; Shek, C.H.; Lai, J.K.L. Recent developments in stainless steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2009, 65, 39–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abdelshehid, M.; Mahmodieh, K.; Mori, K.; Chen, L.; Stoyanov, P.; Davlantes, D.; Foyos, J.; Ogren, J.; Clark, R., Jr.; Es-Said, O.S. On the correlation between fracture toughness and precipitation hardening heat treatment in 15-5PH stainless steel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2007, 14, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rack, H.J.; Kalish, D. The strength, fracture toughness, and low cycle fatigue behavior of 17-4 PH stainless steel. Metall. Trans. 1974, 5, 1595–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rossi, D.J.; Rossi, J.D. PH stainless steel is tougher than you thought. Adv. Mater. Process. 1987, 131, 45–47. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wert, D.E.; Disabella, R.P. Strong, corrosion-resistance stainless steel. Adv. Mater. Process. 2006, 164, 34–36. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuehmann, C.; Tufts, B.; Trester, P. Computational design for ultra high-strength alloy. Adv. Mater. Process. 2008, 166, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cahn, J.W. Nucleation on dislocations. Acta Metall. 1957, 5, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Druzhkov, A.P.; Perminov, D.A. Positron annihilation studies of microstructural changes in cold-worked Fe-Ni-base aging alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 3877–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sha, W.; Cerezo, A.; Smith, G.D.W. Phase chemistry and precipitation reactions in maraging steels: Part IV. Discussion and conclusions. Metall. Trans. A 1993, 24, 1251–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nitta, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Kanno, R.; Takasawa, K.; Iida, T.; Yamazaki, Y.; Ogu, S.; Iijima, Y. Diffusion of molybdenum in α-iron. Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 4117–4125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shapovalov, V.P.; Kurasov, A.N. Diffusion of titanium in iron. Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 1975, 17, 803–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hettich, G.; Mehrer, H.; Maier, K. Self-Diffusion in ferromagnetic α-iron. Scr. Metall. 1977, 11, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 10 01293 g001 550
Figure 1. The strength–toughness–corrosion property profiles of the IMR (Institute of Metal Research) steel and comparative maraging stainless steels under peak-aged conditions. Sphere denotes the property of comparative maraging stainless steel and pentacle denotes the property of IMR steel. The mechanical property data of five commercial maraging stainless were taken from references: 15-5 PH [19], 17-4 PH [20], PH 13-8 Mo [21], Custom 465 [22], Ferrium S53 [23].
Figure 1. The strength–toughness–corrosion property profiles of the IMR (Institute of Metal Research) steel and comparative maraging stainless steels under peak-aged conditions. Sphere denotes the property of comparative maraging stainless steel and pentacle denotes the property of IMR steel. The mechanical property data of five commercial maraging stainless were taken from references: 15-5 PH [19], 17-4 PH [20], PH 13-8 Mo [21], Custom 465 [22], Ferrium S53 [23].
Materials 10 01293 g001
Materials 10 01293 g002 550
Figure 2. Microstructure characterization by high-resolution TEM (transmission electron microscope). (a) Typical martensitic lath in the specimen after CT (cryogenic treatment) treatment, lath boundary is outlined by red dashed line; (b) Dislocations observation in the region taken from the square in (a); (c) Morphology of Ni3Ti and Mo-rich precipitates in the PA-treated specimen; (d1) shows the high-resolution image of Mo-rich precipitate and (d2) shows the corresponding FFT (fast Fourier transform) pattern in the inset. (d3) shows the high-resolution image of Ni3Ti precipitate and (d4) shows the corresponding FFT pattern in the inset.
Figure 2. Microstructure characterization by high-resolution TEM (transmission electron microscope). (a) Typical martensitic lath in the specimen after CT (cryogenic treatment) treatment, lath boundary is outlined by red dashed line; (b) Dislocations observation in the region taken from the square in (a); (c) Morphology of Ni3Ti and Mo-rich precipitates in the PA-treated specimen; (d1) shows the high-resolution image of Mo-rich precipitate and (d2) shows the corresponding FFT (fast Fourier transform) pattern in the inset. (d3) shows the high-resolution image of Ni3Ti precipitate and (d4) shows the corresponding FFT pattern in the inset.
Materials 10 01293 g002
Materials 10 01293 g003 550
Figure 3. Morphology of precipitates observed by atom probe tomography (APT) analysis in PA-treated specimen. (a) 3-D reconstruction of the atomic positions of Fe (pink points), isoconcentration surface for regions containing more than 10 at % Mo (red surfaces) and 35 at % Ni + Ti (green surfaces); (b) Sphere-like Mo-rich phase outlined by 10 at % Mo isoconcentration surface; (c) Rod-like Ni3Ti phase outlined by Ni (green) and Ti (grey) atoms; (d) Flake-like Mo-rich phase outlined by 10 at % Mo isoconcentration surface; (e) Sphere-like Ni3Ti phase outlined by Ni (green) and Ti(grey) atoms.
Figure 3. Morphology of precipitates observed by atom probe tomography (APT) analysis in PA-treated specimen. (a) 3-D reconstruction of the atomic positions of Fe (pink points), isoconcentration surface for regions containing more than 10 at % Mo (red surfaces) and 35 at % Ni + Ti (green surfaces); (b) Sphere-like Mo-rich phase outlined by 10 at % Mo isoconcentration surface; (c) Rod-like Ni3Ti phase outlined by Ni (green) and Ti (grey) atoms; (d) Flake-like Mo-rich phase outlined by 10 at % Mo isoconcentration surface; (e) Sphere-like Ni3Ti phase outlined by Ni (green) and Ti(grey) atoms.
Materials 10 01293 g003
Materials 10 01293 g004 550
Figure 4. 1-D reconstruction of the atomic positions (d–f), and the corresponding one-dimensional concentration profile (a–c), across the Ni3Ti/matrix interface for peak-aged specimen.
Figure 4. 1-D reconstruction of the atomic positions (d–f), and the corresponding one-dimensional concentration profile (a–c), across the Ni3Ti/matrix interface for peak-aged specimen.
Materials 10 01293 g004
Materials 10 01293 g005 550
Figure 5. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the atomic positions of Ni (green points), Ti (grey points) and Mo (red points) for specimens aged at 753 K for different time. All the analyzed volumes are with the dimension of 30 × 30 × 80 nm3.
Figure 5. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the atomic positions of Ni (green points), Ti (grey points) and Mo (red points) for specimens aged at 753 K for different time. All the analyzed volumes are with the dimension of 30 × 30 × 80 nm3.
Materials 10 01293 g005
Materials 10 01293 g006 550
Figure 6. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the atomic positions of Fe (purple pints) and isoconcentration surface for regions containing more than 35 at % Ni + Ti (green surfaces) and 5 at % Mo (red surfaces) for specimens (a) aged for 10 min; (b) aged for 0.5 h; (c) aged for 4 h; (d) aged for 40 h; (e) aged for 100 h. Bounding box size: (a) 58 × 59 × 218 nm3; (b) 55 × 55 × 144 nm3; (c) 64 × 65 × 182 nm3; (d) 59 × 60 × 247 nm3; (e) 67 × 69 × 173 nm3.
Figure 6. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the atomic positions of Fe (purple pints) and isoconcentration surface for regions containing more than 35 at % Ni + Ti (green surfaces) and 5 at % Mo (red surfaces) for specimens (a) aged for 10 min; (b) aged for 0.5 h; (c) aged for 4 h; (d) aged for 40 h; (e) aged for 100 h. Bounding box size: (a) 58 × 59 × 218 nm3; (b) 55 × 55 × 144 nm3; (c) 64 × 65 × 182 nm3; (d) 59 × 60 × 247 nm3; (e) 67 × 69 × 173 nm3.
Materials 10 01293 g006
Materials 10 01293 g007 550
Figure 7. Proximity histograms of Ni3Ti precipitate in different specimens (a) aged for 4 h; (b) aged for 16 h; (c) aged for 100 h. The inserts show the 1 nm thick atom maps through the centers of representative Ni3Ti precipitate in specimens under different aging conditions (Ni for green sphere, Ti for grey sphere, Mo for red sphere).
Figure 7. Proximity histograms of Ni3Ti precipitate in different specimens (a) aged for 4 h; (b) aged for 16 h; (c) aged for 100 h. The inserts show the 1 nm thick atom maps through the centers of representative Ni3Ti precipitate in specimens under different aging conditions (Ni for green sphere, Ti for grey sphere, Mo for red sphere).
Materials 10 01293 g007
Materials 10 01293 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematics showing precipitation mechanism of Ni3Ti and Mo-rich phases in the new maraging stainless steel.
Figure 8. Schematics showing precipitation mechanism of Ni3Ti and Mo-rich phases in the new maraging stainless steel.
Materials 10 01293 g008
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of Institute of Metal Research (IMR) steel (wt %).
Table 1. Chemical composition of Institute of Metal Research (IMR) steel (wt %).
CrNiCoMoTiCONFe
12.537.457.163.141.750.00240.00280.0026Bal.
Table
Table 2. Cluster analysis of specimens under different aging conditions. (Ni + Ti cluster: dmax = 0.5, Nmin = 100; Mo cluster: dmax = 0.5, Nmin = 10).
Table 2. Cluster analysis of specimens under different aging conditions. (Ni + Ti cluster: dmax = 0.5, Nmin = 100; Mo cluster: dmax = 0.5, Nmin = 10).
ItemsCTAT 10 minAT 0.5 hAT 4 hAT 16 hAT 40 hAT 100 h
Volume of analyzed body (nm3)638,160745,996554,895757,120772,475874,380799,779
Ni + Ti cluster density (10−5 nm−3)059.92116.78114.5179.7456.0415.63
Mo cluster density (10−5 nm−3)0000.2651.523.099.38

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, J.; Wang, W.; Babar Shahzad, M.; Yan, W.; Shan, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, K. A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy. Materials 2017, 10, 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111293

AMA Style

Tian J, Wang W, Babar Shahzad M, Yan W, Shan Y, Jiang Z, Yang K. A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy. Materials. 2017; 10(11):1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Jialong, Wei Wang, M. Babar Shahzad, Wei Yan, Yiyin Shan, Zhouhua Jiang, and Ke Yang. 2017. "A New Maraging Stainless Steel with Excellent Strength–Toughness–Corrosion Synergy" Materials 10, no. 11: 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop