Next Article in Journal
Hydrogen Storage in Boron Nitride and Carbon Nanomaterials
Previous Article in Journal
Crop Management Effects on the Energy and Carbon Balances of Maize Stover-Based Ethanol Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Anaerobic Degradability and Kinetics of Harvested Submerged Aquatic Weeds Used for Nutrient Phytoremediation

1
Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
2
Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, 6-6-06 Aza-Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
3
Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
4
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan road, Minghang District, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2015, 8(1), 304-318; https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010304
Submission received: 25 November 2014 / Accepted: 26 December 2014 / Published: 31 December 2014

Abstract

:
In this study, eight different submerged aquatic species were screened by batch biochemical methane potential and anaerobic degradability tests to identify a promising/suitable feedstock. Kinetics of the best-screened substrate were studied in a mesophilic semi-continuous experiment. The aquatic species Myriophyllum aquaticum, Egeria densa and Potamogeton perfoliatus showed relatively higher methane yields of over 400 NmL/g-VS (volatile solids). Semi-continuous operation was carried out by feeding E. densa for over 400 days. The achieved results were 33%–53% chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction and methane yield of 126–231 NmL/g-VS with a short hydraulic retention time (HRT). Additionally, the NH4+ and PO43− releases from the biomass to water were found to be low (18%–27% and 2.5%–3.9%) throughout the experiment. Hydrolysis was the limiting step in the digestion of E. densa, regardless of changes in HRT (15–45 days). The acid-phase model indicated that the hydrolysis rate constant (kh) of E. densa was 0.058 one/day, which was one third lower the kh value of food waste, but quite similar to cow manure.

1. Introduction

Nutrient phytoremediation using aquatic weeds has been considered a feasible method for secondary wastewater treatment or in situ water purification. Water pollution and eutrophication by excess nutrients owing to rapid industrialization and civilization are becoming big issues, especially in those countries where no well-systematized wastewater treatment plants are available to properly purify domestic wastewater. Thus, development of simple and low cost wastewater treatment technologies have attracted the interest of researchers and engineers. Aquatic weeds are capable of directly uptaking inorganic nutrients and also allow attachment of microorganisms and animals responsible for nutrient removal, so the weeds are effective in low-cost treatment of pollutants [1,2]. The nutrient uptake efficiency of this process depends on the weeds’ ability to accumulate the nutrients as biomass. Therefore, repeated harvesting of the excessive biomass is necessary to maintain the high nutrient uptake efficiency. However, management or utilization of the harvested plant biomass is a primary issue of concern. When the plants decay, nutrients are released again to water body, and that has a negative impact on water quality [3]. Furthermore, excessive growth of aquatic weeds is conversely able to cause various problems such as interfering with ship navigation, releasing unwanted odors, blocking daylight to the organisms and deoxygenation of water leading to the death of fish and other aquatic life forms [4,5,6]. Harvesting and disposal of the excessive weeds are costly issues, for example removing 1 ton (wet weight) of weeds requires around 300 USD (US dollars), and 1200 tons of excessive weeds are removed every year from Lake Biwa, which is the biggest lake in Japan. Nowadays, cost-effective disposal and bio-resource utilization are required to build a sustainable treatment system.
Anaerobic digestion has been globally studied and considered as a cost-effective way of waste disposal, and therefore this technology has been widely installed, even in low-income rural areas [7]. Harvested aquatic weeds can be digested and used to successfully produce methane as a renewable energy source [4,5,8,9,10]. Aquatic plants generally contain a larger amount of biodegradable protein than other plants, and also have the possibility of allowing microorganisms to degrade substrate relatively rapid in anaerobic digestion. A lot of weed species have been utilized by researchers for anaerobic digestion, and it was found that the organic matter composition varied greatly depending on the weed species, which resulted in a wide range of methane yields among the different weed species (38–361 mL/g-volatile solids (VS) added) [9,10]. Like other plant species, aquatic weeds contain cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, which are characterized by slow degradation rates in anaerobic digestion. Lignin is known to be hardly degraded during practical reaction times. Benner et al. [11] reported that only 1.5%–16.9% of lignin was degraded during over 200 days of anaerobic digestion. Thus, lignocellulosic material-rich weeds seem to limit biological methane production, so the choice of an appropriate species is important for effective methane production.
Until now, most researchers have concentrated on water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) [8,12,13], and there is very limited available information about the anaerobic digestibility of other kinds of aquatic weeds [9,10]. Furthermore, most studies have focused on batch reactors, but in most practical cases, an anaerobic digester is operated at a semi-continuous or continuous mode. To the best of authors’ knowledge, only two research groups have investigated the semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth as a floating aquatic macrophyte [8,14]. Additionally, the digestibility of submerged aquatic macrophyte species under semi-continuous operation remains unclear, as results from studies with other conventional batch methods suggested that there was a gap in methane yield during batch and semi-continuous experiments. Generally, the methane obtained from the semi-continuous experiment was rather lower than seen in the batch experiment [8]. Other aquatic weed species need to be investigated under semi-continuous operation conditions to expand and understanding their realistic digestibility. In another aspect, semi-continuous experiments are useful for discussing the kinetics of individual reaction steps in anaerobic digestion—hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis—by considering the mass balance between influent and effluent streams. As discussed above, lignocellulosic materials have biodegradation difficulties, and in most cases hydrolysis becomes the limiting step [15,16]. Since the slow hydrolysis limits the digestion efficiency of plant materials, submerged aquatic weeds are expected to allow easy hydrolysis and rapid methane production due to their higher protein content than other plant species [10]. The reaction step that truly governs the entire reaction rate in anaerobic digestion of submerged aquatic weeds is not yet well explained. Therefore, the limiting step needs to be determined and interpreted in terms of degradation kinetics in semi-continuous experiments. Thus, the objective of this study is firstly to screen promising feedstocks for anaerobic digestion among eight different submerged aquatic weed species, and subsequently investigating the anaerobic degradability and degradation kinetics of the weeds in a long-term semi-continuous anaerobic digestion.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Screening of Submerged Aquatic Weed Species Used for Anaerobic Digestion Based on Batch Biochemical Methane Potential Tests

Batch digestion experiments were run in triplicate for 60 days using eight different submerged aquatic weed species (Hydrilla verticillata; Potamogeton inbaensis; Potamogeton dentatus; Potamogeton malaianus; Ceratophyllum demersum; Potamogeton perfoliatus; Myriophyllum aquaticum; Egeria densa) to screen a suitable feedstock for anaerobic digestion. H. verticillata, P. inbaensis, P. dentatus, P. malaianus, C. demersum, P. perfoliatus are all native species and common macrophytes observed at lakes and waterways in Japan. On the one hand, M. aquaticum and E. densa are popular invasive alien species and they often cause excessive growth problems in lakes of Japan. In addition, it has been previously demonstrated that these eight plant species are useful for nutrient remediation. The batch experiment of E. crassipes was additionally conducted as a contrastive feedstock, which has been well investigated. The aquatic weeds mainly consisted of protein and cellulose (Table 1). There was a slight variation in cellulose concentrations among the plant species, and the concentrations ranged from 178 to 212 mg/g-total solids (TS). A significant level of hemi- cellulose was contained in H. verticillata (66.0 mg/g-TS) and C. demersum (82.0 mg/g-TS).
Table 1. Characteristics and composition of the submerged macrophytes.
Table 1. Characteristics and composition of the submerged macrophytes.
SpeciesCellulose (mg/g-TS)Hemicellulose (mg/g-TS)Lignin (mg/g-TS)Protein (mg/g-TS)Lipid (mg/g-TS)Carbon/nitrogen ratio
P. malaianus212Not detected116350 ± 3934.212.5 ± 0.3
P. perfoliatus200Not detected165298 ± 3226.18.5± 0.2
C. demersum18582.0186315 ± 12131.810.4 ± 0.2
P. dentatus195Not detected155266 ± 3941.08.7 ± 0.1
H. verticillata17866.0129261 ± 8615.19.6 ± 0.4
E. densa202Not detected50294 ± 2429.110.2 ± 0.2
P. inbaensis210Not detected83280 ± 3249.412.9 ± 0.4
M. aquaticum200Not detected59286 ± 3353.89.8 ± 0.3
Lignin content of all the aquatic weeds was relatively low (50–186 mg/g-TS). The protein concentrations varied from 261 to 350 mg/g-TS among the different species and P. malaianus and C. demersum exhibited the higher concentration levels. Lipid concentrations were low (15 to 54 mg/g-TS). Figure 1 shows cumulative methane production performance for 60 days per g-VS added and theoretical maximum methane production, which was calculated from theoretical methane value of 350 mL-CH4/g-chemical oxygen demand (COD) of substrate. The results showed more or less similar cumulative methane production patterns between the nine species. Almost half of the total methane production was obtained within the first 4 days, and the gas production reached saturation at day 36. As a result, the volumes of methane varied from 275 to 418 NmL/g-VS. E. densa, M. aquaticum and P. perfoliatus had relatively higher methane yields over 400 NmL/g-VS while the yield of E. crassipes was the lowest (275 NmL/g-VS). Other weeds yielded in the range of 334–355 NmL/g-VS. Compared to the theoretical maximum production, the methane production from the weeds in the experiment reached approximately 70%–90% of the theoretical values. It is clear from these results that all the eight submerged plant species had higher methane yields than E. crassipes which is used as a conventional aquatic weed fed to digesters. This is likely due to the higher protein content of the submerged weeds, which are thus relatively easy to degrade. Although E. crappipes is known for its low lignin content, which was below 15 wt% in previous studies [17,18], it mostly consists of cellulose and hemicellulose. The protein content of E. crappipes reported elsewhere was rather lower (below 13 wt%) than those of the weed used in this study [17,18].
Figure 1. Cumulative methane production of different aquatic plant species.
Figure 1. Cumulative methane production of different aquatic plant species.
Energies 08 00304 g001
The methane yields obtained in this study were in accordance with earlier studies investigating various floating and submerged aquatic weeds. For example, the yield of E. crassipes was within the range of 150–300 mL/g-VS [4,8,14,19]. Koyama et al. [10] examined the methane production potentials of several submerged aquatic weed species, including C. demersum, E. nuttallii, E. densa, P. maakianus and P. malaianus under mesophilic condition (37 °C), and reported productions of 161–361 mL/g-VS during a period of 14 days. In that research, among the five species studied, E. nuttallii had the highest methane yield (361 mL/g-VS) and E. densa had the second highest yield (287 mL/g-VS). This result is quite similar to the results achieved in this study, as E. densa showed a higher methane yield than C. demersum and P. malaianus, and moreover, E. densa produced about 300 NmL/g-VS of methane within 14 days. It is well known that E. densa has a high growth rate and inhibits a wide range of aquatic systems [20,21]. For these reasons, E. densa is thought to be one of the promising substrates for anaerobic digestion in respect of not only methane yield, but also biomass productivity.
Generally, methane yield in anaerobic digestion is positively correlated to lipid/protein contents and negatively to lignocellulosic material content. In a previous study, it was found that lipid/protein rich feedstocks showed higher methane yields than cellulose-rich ones [22]. Koyama et al. [10] observed a negative correlation between methane yield and lignin content among several submerged aquatic weeds. However, it was difficult to find a statistically significant relevance between any organic compounds and methane yield in anaerobic digestion of this study. Nevertheless, it should be noted that E. densa and M. aquaticum, which showed higher methane yields, were characterized by their low lignin content of below 60 mg/g-TS. However in the case of the other samples, there was no significant correlation between methane yield and lignin content.

2.2. Performance of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion Treating E. Densa in Semi-Continuous Operation

2.2.1. Characteristics of Feedstock (E. Densa)

E. densa, which showed higher methane production in the batch experiment, was selected as the feedstock for semi-continuous operation because it was an invasive and one of the most predominant aquatic weed species in the major lakes and rivers of Japan. Feedstock was prepared by diluting dry E. densa with 10-fold the amount of tap water. The feedstock possessed 89–94 g/L-TS, 76–79 g/L-VS, 88–94 g/L COD. The carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio was 10 on average. Total nitrogen (T-N) and total phosphorus (T-P) concentrations were varied within the range of 2500–3800 mg/L, 260–510 mg/L throughout the experiment, respectively. The Fe, Ni, Co concentrations were 4.0 ± 1.2, 0.0053 ± 0.0025 and 0.0014 ± 0.0006 mg/g-TS (nearly equal to minimum detection limit of the equipment), respectively.

2.2.2. Time Course of Gas Production and Digestibility during the Experiment

A semi-continuous digestion experiment of E. densa was performed over 400 days by gradually shortening the hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 45 to 15 days in a continuously mixed reactor. Average organic loading rates (OLR) corresponding to each HRT were 2.01 ± 0.05 (45 days), 3.05 ± 0.08 (30 days), 4.56 ± 0.13 (20 days) and 6.24 ± 0.07 (15 days) kg-COD/m3/day, respectively. Figure 2 indicates the time course of gas production rate and gas composition throughout the experiment. The gas production rate was slightly increased according to decrease in HRT from 45 to 30 days. However, it maintained a similar level during HRTs of 20 and 15 days. Methane and CO2 concentrations showed a variation from 40% to 60% throughout the experiment. The pH was maintained within a range of 7.4–7.7 during the whole operation without any chemical pH control. The volatile fatty acids (VFA) was generally below 300 mg/L as acetate, but increased a little over 1000 mg/L (three times higher) during HRTs of 20 and 15 days.
Figure 2. (a) Time courses of the biogas production rate; and (b) CH4 and CO2 concentrations in the biogas throughout the semi-continuous experiment. HRT: hydraulic retention time.
Figure 2. (a) Time courses of the biogas production rate; and (b) CH4 and CO2 concentrations in the biogas throughout the semi-continuous experiment. HRT: hydraulic retention time.
Energies 08 00304 g002

2.2.3. Characteristics of Organic Compounds Degradation

Table 2 summarizes the characteristics of organic compound degradation during the anaerobic digestion of E. densa. The evaluation was carried out during the last 10 days of each HRT-operation. The average methane production rate was increased when the HRT was shortened from 45 to 20 days, and decreased when the HRT was 15 days. The methane yield decreased from 231 (45 days HRT) to 126 NmL/g-VS (15 days HRT). The COD reduction decreased gradually from 52.7% to 33.1% with shortening HRT. The protein degradation also showed a similar variation, and maintained higher levels than that of COD during the experiment. The NH4+ and PO43− release were in the ranges of 18%–27%, 2.5%–3.8%, respectively. There has been a smaller variation in methane yield, COD and protein degradations, and NH4+ and PO43− release, respectively. Firstly, it should be noted that E. densa was characterized by very low solubilization of nitrogen and phosphorus as NH4+ and PO43− released from biomass to water. For example, the NH4+ release from food waste was 68%–77% in our previous study [23] (data not shown). One of the important roles of submerged aquatic weeds in a phytoremediation system is uptaking nitrogen and phosphorus from the water bodies. As such, the less NH4+ and PO43− releases result in reduced re-outflow of fixed nutrients of the weeds via anaerobic digestion, which is considered preferable.
Table 2. Effect of HRT on the degradation characteristics in the semi-continuous experiment.
Table 2. Effect of HRT on the degradation characteristics in the semi-continuous experiment.
ParameterHRT (days)
45302015
Methane production rate (NL/L/d)0.38 ± 0.060.53 ± 0.040.67 ± 0.080.64 ± 0.04
Methane yield (NmL/g-VS added)231 ± 24201 ± 10171 ± 21126 ± 7
COD reduction (%)52.7 ± 8.244.6 ± 2.438.2 ± 0.933.1 ± 1.8
Protein reduction (%)62.1 ± 6.753.9 ± 3.347.8 ± 3.738.7 ± 13.2
NH4+ release (%)23.4 ± 3.322.0 ± 5.726.8 ± 2.718.0 ± 3.2
PO43− release (%)2.5 ± 1.52.5 ± 0.53.9 ± 0.93.8 ± 1.7
However, the energy recovery was less than expected. The methane yield (126–231 NmL/g-VS) obtained from the semi-continuous experiment was lower than in the batch experiment (413 NmL/g-VS). In addition, it is suggested lower methanogenic rate or yield of the semi-continuous reactor that it took 30 days of retention time to produce 201 NmL/g-VS methane in the semi-continuous operation while 200 NmL/g-VS methane was produced within the first 4 days of the batch experiment. Similar results have been obtained in other studies using different aquatic weeds [8,14]. The biogas yield of the semi-continuous experiment fed with water hyacinth was about half of the methane potential (340 mL-CH4/g-VS) observed in the batch experiment [8]. Srivastava [14] reported similar biogas yield of around 300 mL-biogas/g-VS in a semi-continuous experiment feeding water hyacinth. Chanakya et al. [12] also reported low methane yields (292–348 mL-biogas/g-VS with 50% CH4) in the semi-continuous experiment. From these outcomes, it seems to be a common issue that aquatic weeds virtually produce rather less methane during practical retention times (<30 days) of anaerobic digestion than the saturation level which those weeds can potentially produce. By contrast, the batch experiment enabled the faster methane production and reached the saturation in a shorter period even under a high feed to inoculum (F/I) ratio (0.5). These facts suggest that there was a significant difference in methanogenic activity or cell density between the batch reactors and semi-continuous reactors, and thus, it took longer time to degrade enough E. densa in the semi-continuous operation. The possible reason for the slow methane production of the semi-continuous experiment is likely due to lower activity of microbial consortia. The seed sludge used for batch experiment was taken from the reactor fed with food waste and supplementary micronutrients (Fe, Co, Ni). Although the batch experiment was carried out under nutrient-rich condition (C/N ratio, macro or micronutrients content were suitable), semi-continuous operation was probably under nutrient-limited conditions. In this research, firstly, less available macronutrients (C, N, P) due to low organic degradation efficiency of E. densa likely resulted in reduced microbial growth in the reactor. As Table 2 shows, P is especially limited. The PO43− concentration was low as in most cases 1–5 mg-phosphorus (P)/L and even NH4+ concentration was usually below 1000 mg-N/L, while those in the food waste-digestion were about 1500–4000 mg-N/L and 60–200 mg-P/L in the previous study [24]. Furthermore, low concentration of micronutrients such as Fe, Co could contribute to limit activity of microbial consortia. Martinez and Martinez and Church [25] demonstrated that Fe and Co added to the media significantly stimulated cellulose digestion. Qiang et al. [26] calculated the required Fe/COD, Co/COD, Ni/COD ratio in the solid waste substrate for anaerobic digestion, and suggested that Fe/COD, Co/COD, Ni/COD were required in the quantities of 200, 6.0 and 5.7 mg/kg, respectively. In this study, the Fe/COD, Co/COD, Ni/COD ratios of E. densa were 3900, 1.4, 5.1 mg/kg, which indicated that the Co/COD was significantly lower than the required. The Co shortage was likely to negatively affect anaerobic cellulose degradation. Moreover, there was the possibility that biologically available C/N ratio was too high due to the very low dissolved nitrogen release (317–934 mg/L NH4+-N and 331–898 mg/L dissolved T-N in the reactor) of E. densa during anaerobic degradation. The C/N ratio of E. densa was lower than conventional digestion feedstocks, but the low concentration of released NH4+ as available nitrogen source might result in reduced working C/N ratio. These factors might restrict microbial growth and activity, resulting in lower methane yield in the semi-continuous experiment. Addition of nutrient seems to be necessary as mentioned by O’Sullivan et al. [4], in the anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth, Cambomba and Salvinia. The authors concluded that the nutrient addition did not significantly contribute to batch digestion of aquatic weeds, however, the semi-continuous digestion would require additional nutrients for the reasons discussed above. Finally, another possibility is a reduced methanogenic activity due to toxic substances produced by the weeds. It is widely known that aquatic weeds, including E. densa, cause a growth inhibition of micro- and macro-organisms by allelopathic effects [21]. Bio-assays using various species of weeds have demonstrated that E. densa has an inhibitory effect on algal growth, and the intensity of inhibition varied between the algal species [27,28]. However, there has been no report investigating inhibitory effects of E. densa on methanogenic microbial consortia yet. Further studies are needed to understand inhibitory effect of aquatic weeds on anaerobic digestion.

2.2.4. Rate Limiting Step and Effect of HRT on the Reaction Steps

Figure 3a summarizes the reaction rates of three digestion steps in the semi-continuous experiment. All the reaction rates were increased during HRT ranging from 45 to 20 days. When the HRT became 15 days, the methanogenesis rate dropped from 1.95 to 1.82 g-COD/L/day while the hydrolysis and acidogenesis rates were increased. It is common in continuous operation of anaerobic digestion that methanogenic activity is decreased under too short HRT due to the low growth rate of methanogenic archaea, and in this case, the 15 days HRT seems to be too short for methanogenic archaea to retain enough microbial cells in the reactor. A comparison between the hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis efficiencies clearly indicates that hydrolysis was the limiting step at any HRT length. Even when HRT was as long as 45 days, the gap between the three reaction rates did not become narrow. In anaerobic digestion, solid particles of E. densa were hydrolyzed first, and then, soluble contents produced were converted into volatile acids and hydrogen. Finally, methane and CO2 were generated from acetic acid and hydrogen. When it comes to the details of this reactor, the acetic acid and propionic acid was the main VFA remained in the reactor, and there was no significant amount of hydrogen detected in the biogas. Although an accumulation of dissolved COD means acidogenesis from dissolved COD content to VFA was limited, the dissolved COD in the reactor remained within 1.0–4.3 g/L under all the HRT, and no significant variation was observed, which means successful acidogenesis ocurred throughout the experiment. Acetic acid was 100–200 mg/L on average, regardless of HRT, but propionic acid was increased about 100–1000 mg/L when HRT was 15 days. The accumulation of propionic acid is a common phenomenon that causes limited methanogenic activity. These data supports that hydrolysis was generally limited, resulting in no significant accumulation of the intermediates present, and methanogenesis rate was reduced when the HRT was 15 days.
Figure 3. (a) The reaction rates of hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis in the semi-continuous experiment; (b) The hydrolysis rate variations based on acid-phase model.
Figure 3. (a) The reaction rates of hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis in the semi-continuous experiment; (b) The hydrolysis rate variations based on acid-phase model.
Energies 08 00304 g003
The hydrolysis rate constant (kh) of the semi-continuous experiment was calculated using the acid-phase model and was compared with the kh values obtained from our previous studies dealing with conventional digestion substrates [24,29]. All three substrates contained around 100 g/L TS and these were digested in a semi-continuous mode using mesophilic continuously mixed reactors. From the model, the kh values were determined as 0.058 one/day (E. densa), 0.20 one/day (food waste) and 0.066 one/day (cow manure), and the biologically degradable fractions as particulate COD were 62.8% (E. densa), 89.8% (food waste) and 59.7% (cow manure), respectively. Figure 3b summarizes the hydrolysis rates of the three substrates and the calculated values. The kh of E. densa was found to be lower than those of cow manure and below one third of that of food waste. This result indicates the hydrolysis rate of E. densa was lower than those of the other conventional feedstocks, but, attention should be paid to the fact that E. densa was comparable in reaction rate to cow manure as a conventional substrate without any special pretreatment. Meanwhile, as the biologically degradable fractions values suggested, an extended digestion would enable E. densa to achieve higher hydrolysis efficiency resulting in greater methane yield than that of cow manure. E. densa seems to consist of slow-biodegradable organic matter, and that is partially due to the high cellulose content. Generally, hydrolysis is widely considered as the rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion of solid cellulose [15]. The hydrolysis kinetic studies on anaerobic digestion of cellulosic materials have provided very low kh values. The kh values of office paper, cardboard, newsprint, hay, and straw were 0.036, 0.046, 0.057, 0.01 and 0.087 one/day, respectively [30,31,32]. E. densa had the similar but a little higher level of kh than those of the other previously studied cellulosic feedstocks.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Biochemical Methane Potential Tests

A long-term outdoor experiment of wastewater purification processes using different kinds of aquatic plants was conducted, and the results have been partially reported elsewhere [33]. The processes have been fed with a mixture of domestic wastewater and water from Lake Kasumigaura. The inoculated plants were as follows: (1) H. verticillata; (2) P. inbaensis; (3) P. dentatus; (4) P. malaianus; (5) C. demersum; (6) P. perfoliatus; (7) M. aquaticum; (8) E. densa; and (9) E. crassipes. These plants were cultivated independently in parallel. The excess biomass harvested from the plants was used as feedstock for batch anaerobic digestion experiments. After draining the water off from the harvested plants, they were dried in the air for a day, and disintegrated by an electric blender to below 5 mm in length to allow reproducible results by dispersing the plant bodies. Subsequently, the feedstocks were diluted with tap water to make up the TS as approximately 10%.
Anaerobic digested sludge obtained from a mesophilic digester treating food waste was used as an inoculum after acclimating with the mixture of nine aquatic plants over three months at 35 °C. The F/I ratio based on feedstock VS and inoculum volatile suspended solids (VSS) was 0.5. The feed and inoculum were added to the closed glass vials with a working volume of approximately 60 mL, subsequently the vials were flushed by nitrogen gas and sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and aluminum caps to create a strictly anaerobic environment. The vials were incubated in shaking incubators at 35 °C with a shaking speed of 120 rpm. The gas production was measured using a glass syringe equipped with a needle. In this experiment, all batch tests were performed in triplicate, and vials containing only the inoculum were used as blanks. Besides, the biogas production from the blank was subtracted to correct for the biogas production from the inoculum.

3.2. Semi-Continuous Anaerobic Digestion Experiment of E. Densa

A continuously stirred reactor was used for the semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of E. densa. The reactor was made of PVC and had a working volume of 1 L. Sludge in the reactor was continuously mixed by an impeller at a mixing speed of 300 rpm. Hot water was circulated through the reactor’s water jacket space to maintain a stable temperature of 35 °C. The feedstock E. densa was harvested every one or two months throughout the year from a water purification testing flume, which was 20 m in length and 5 m in width, semi-continuously fed with the mixture of domestic wastewater and lake water. After harvesting, the plants were drained and disintegrated by an electric blender. The pretreated E. densa were stored at 4 °C as dried state and diluted with tap water to make up the TS as approximately 10% when it was fed into the reactor. On the first day of the experiment, the anaerobic sludge obtained from a digester treating food waste was added to the reactor. Sludge withdrawal and substrate feeding were performed manually with a syringe every day at a given time.

3.3. Analytical Methods

Biogas production rate of the reactors was measured by a PMMA (poly(methyl methacrylate)) Milli Gas-counter (Ritter, Buckinghamshire, UK). The proportions of CH4, CO2 and N2 in the biogas were determined using a gas chromatograph (GC-8A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. The stainless steel column in the gas chromatograph was packed with Shicarbon ST (Shimadzu GLC). The COD concentration was determined using COD Digest Vials (HACH, Loveland, CO, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. TS and VS were determined according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standard Method [34]. Cellulose and hemicellulose concentrations were measured by the method of Van Soest and McQueen [35], and lignin was measured according to Effland [36]. The pH was determined as soon as sampling using a pH meter (TOA-DKK, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a GST-5721C probe. The VFA concentration was determined using a gas chromatograph (GC14B, Shimadzu) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a StabiliwaxR-DA capillary column (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Nitrogen in the form of ammonium ion (NH4+–N) was analyzed using the automatic nutrient analyzer (Traacs 2000, Bran + Luebbe, Norderstedt, Germany). Samples for VFA and NH4+–N analysis were prepared by centrifuging sludge samples at 13000 rpm for 5 min and filtering them through 0.45 μm pore-size filters. The elemental composition of C and N was analyzed using an elemental analyzer (EA 1112, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Metal concentrations of the weed were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (61E-Trace, Thermo Jerrell Ash/Baird, Franklin, MA, USA) The C, N and metal measurements were performed via a fundamental measurement service of National Institute for Environmental Studies.
COD and protein reduction were calculated according to the way in the previous study [23]. NH4+ and PO43− release from the weed were defined using the following equations:
NH 4 +   release   ( % ) = 100 × NH 4 + N eff - NH 4 + N inf T-N inf NH 4 + N inf
PO 4 3 -   release   ( % ) = 100 × PO 4 3 - P eff PO 4 3 - P inf T-P inf PO 4 3 - P inf
where T-Ninf and T-Pinf are the influent T-N and T-P, respectively.
Hydrolysis, acidogenesis and methanogenesis rate based on COD was defined according to the acid-phase model [33] by the following equations:
Hydrolysis rate (g-COD/L/day) = Q ( COD parinf COD pareff ) / V
Acidogenesis rate (g-COD/L/day) = Q ( COD VFAeff COD VFAinf + ( COD inf COD eff ) ) / V
Methanogenesis rate (g-COD/L/day) = COD CH 4 / V
where Q is the flow rate of substrate (L/day) and V is the reactor volume (L). CODinf and CODeff are the influent and effluent COD, respectively. CODCH4 is the COD of methane produced per day. CODpar is the particulate COD (CODpar = COD − CODdis), CODdis is the dissolved COD, and CODVFA is the COD of VFA. In the Equation (4), (CODinf − CODeff) indicates the COD, which was converted from VFA into methane. In these equations, bacterial growth was neglected although the original acid-phase model considered it. Hydrolysis of particulate COD in the semi-continuous experiment under steady-state conditions was considered according to a first-order reaction presented as follows [37,38]:
d F d t = k h F
Q   ( F 0 F eff ) V k h F eff = HRT ( F 0 F eff ) k h F eff = 0
HRT = F 0   ( HRT F 0 F eff ) 1 k h
where F is the concentration of particulate organic matter, kh is the hydrolysis rate coefficient and F0 is initial concentration of degradable particulate organic matter. F0 and kh based on COD were obtained from a plot of HRT/(F0Feff) and HRT using the slope and intercept. Although F0 was unknown, F0Feff can be calculated by the following equation:
F0Feff = (CODinfpar + CODinapar) – (CODeffpar + CODinapar) = CODinfpar – CODeffpar
where CODinapar is inert particulate COD. Although CODinapar is unkown, (F0Feff) can be calculated using only CODinfpar and CODeffpart.

4. Conclusions

This study has demonstrated that M. aquaticum, E. densa and P. perfoliatus have relatively higher methane yields of over 400 NmL/g-VS. M. aquaticum and E. densa showed higher production due to their low lignin content characterized in the batch experiments. Semi-continuous operation over 400 days using E. densa resulted in 33%–53% COD reduction and 126–231 NmL/g-VS methane yield, besides, the performance increased when the HRT was shortened from 45 to 15 days. The low levels of NH4+ and PO43− release were maintained throughout the experiment, indicating reduced re-outflow of nutrients via phytoremediation in anaerobic digestion. Hydrolysis was the limiting step in the digestion of E. densa and the gap between the three reaction rates was maintained in the range of 20–45 days HRT. The acid-phase model indicated that the kh of E. densa was 0.058 one/day, which was lower than conventional feedstocks and a little higher than those of other cellulosic feedstocks.

Author Contributions

Takuro Kobayashi designed and carried out all the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Ya-Peng Wu performed the semi-continuous experiment. Zhi-Jiang Lu performed the batch experiment. Kai-Qin Xu designed the experiment and edited the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tripathi, B.D.; Upadhyay, A.R. Dairy effluent polishing by aquatic macrophytes. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2003, 143, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nahlik, A.M.; Mitsch, W.J. Tropical treatment wetlands dominated by free-floating macrophytes for water quality improvement in Costa Rica. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 28, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Van Donk, E.; Gulati, R.D.; Iedema, A.; Meulemans, J.T. Macrophyte-related shifts in the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of the different trophic levels in a biomanipulated shallow lake. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1993, 251, 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  4. O’Sullivan, C.; Rounsefell, B.; Grinham, A.; Clarke, W.; Udy, J. Anaerobic digestion of harvested aquatic weeds: water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), cabomba (Cabomba caroliniana) and salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 1459–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Escobar, M.M.; Voyevoda, M.; Fühner, C.; Zehnsdorf, A. Potential uses of Elodea nuttallii-harvested biomass. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2011, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. Haga, H.; Ishikawa, K. Spatial distribution of submerged macrophytes in the southern basin of Lake Biwa in the summer of 2007, in comparison with that in 2002. Jpn. J. Limnol. 2011, 72, 81–88. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rajendran, K.; Aslanzadeh, S.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Household biogas digesters—A review. Energies 2012, 5, 2911–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chynoweth, D.P.; Dolenc, D.A.; Ghosh, S.; Henry, M.P.; Jerger, D.E.; Srivastava, V.J. Kinetics and advanced digester design for anaerobic digestion of water hyacinth and primary sludge. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 1982, 12, 381–398. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abbasi, S.A.; Nipaney, P.C.; Schaumberg, G.D. Bioenergy potential of eight common aquatic weeds. Biol. Wastes 1990, 34, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koyama, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Ishikawa, K.; Ban, S.; Toda, T. Anaerobic digestion of submerged macrophytes: Chemical composition and anaerobic digestibility. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 69, 304–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Benner, R.; Maccubbin, A.E.; Hodson, R.E. Anaerobic biodegradation of thelignin and polysaccharide components of lignocellulose and synthetic lignin bysediment microflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Chanakya, H.N.; Borgaonkar, S.; Meena, G.; Jagadish, K.S. Solid-phase biogas production with garbage or water hyacinth. Bioresour. Technol. 1993, 46, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patel, V.; Desai, M.; Madamwar, D. Thermochemical pretreatment of water hyacinth for improved biomethanation. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 1993, 42, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Srivastava, R.C. Kinetics of fresh water hyacinth digestion in semi-continuous operation. Chem. Eng. J. 1995, 56, 100–113. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pfeffer, J.T. Temperature effects on anaerobic fermentation of domestic refuse. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1974, 16, 771–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Taherzadeh, M.J.; Karimi, K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes toimprove ethanol and biogas production: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9, 1621–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Magdum, S.S.; More, S.; Nadaf, A. Biochemical conversion of acid-pretreated water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) to alcohol using pichia stipitis NCIM3497. Int. J. Adv. Biotechnol. Res. 2012, 3, 585–590. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mukherjee, R.; Ghosh, M.; Nandi, B. Improvement of dry matter digestibility of water hyacinth by solid state fermentation using white rot fungi. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 42, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Chuang, Y.-S.; Lay, C.-H.; Sen, B.; Chen, C.-C.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Wu, J.-H.; Lin, C.-S.; Lin, C.-Y. Biohydrogen and biomethane from water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) fermentation: Effects of substrate concentration and incubation temperature. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 14195–14203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pistori, R.E.; Camargo, A.F.; Henry-Silva, G.G. Relative growth rate and doubling time of the submerged aquatic macrophyte Egeria densa Planch. Acta Limnol. Brasiliensia 2004, 16, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yarrow, M.; Marin, V.H.; Finlayson, M.; Tironi, A.; Delgado, L.E.; Fischer, F. The ecology of Egeria densa Planchon (Liliopsida: Alismatales): A wetland ecosystem engineer. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2009, 82, 299–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kobayashi, T.; Xu, K.Q.; Li, Y.Y.; Inamori, Y. Evaluation of hydrogen and methane production from municipal solid wastes with different compositions of fat, protein, cellulosic materials and the other carbohydrates. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 15711–15718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kobayashi, T.; Xu, K.Q.; Li, Y.Y.; Inamori, Y. Effect of sludge recirculation on characteristics of hydrogen production in a two-stage hydrogen–methane fermentation process treating food wastes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 5602–5611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kobayashi, T.; Wu, Y.P.; Xu, K.Q.; Li, Y.Y. Effect of mixing driven by siphon flow: Parallel experiments using the anaerobic reactors with different mixing modes. Energies 2013, 6, 4207–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martinez, A.; Church, D.C. Effect of various mineral elements on in vitro rumen cellulose digestion. J. Anim. Sci. 1970, 31, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Qiang, H.; Lang, D.L.; Li, Y.Y. High-solid mesophilic methane fermentation of food waste with an emphasis on Iron, Cobalt, Nickel requirements. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 103, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nakai, S.; Inoue, Y.; Hosomi, M.; Murakami, A. Growth inhibition of blue–green algae by allelopathic effects of macrophytes. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hilt, S. Allelopathic inhibition of epiphytes by submerged macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 2006, 85, 252–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sakurai, K.; Li, Y.Y.; Noike, T. Characteristics of mesophilic methane fermentation of high-solid content cow manure. J. Jpn. Soc. Waste Manag. Expert. 2005, 16, 65–73. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vavilin, V.A.; Lokshina, L.Y.; Jokela, J.P.; Rintala, J.A. Modeling solid waste decomposition. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 94, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Angelidaki, I.; Sanders, W. Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradablity of macropollutants. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2004, 3, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Veeken, A.; Hamelers, B. Effect of temperature on hydrolysis rates of selected biowaste components. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 69, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, Z.; Li, J.; Inamori, R.; Xu, K.Q.; Sugiura, N.; Inamori, Y. Comparative study on purification characteristics of various submerged macrophyte species in different seasons. Jpn. J. Water Treat. Biol. 2013, 49, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  34. Clesceri, L.S.; Greenberg, A.E.; Eaton, A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  35. Van Soest, P.J.; McQueen, R.W. The chemistry and estimation of fibre. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1973, 32, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Effland, M.J. Modified procedure to determine acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Tappi J. 1977, 60, 143–144. [Google Scholar]
  37. Eastman, J.A.; Ferguson, J.F. Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestion. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1981, 53, 352–366. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pavlostathis, S.G.; Giraldo-Gomez, E. Kinetics of anaerobic treatment: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 1991, 21, 411–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kobayashi, T.; Wu, Y.-P.; Lu, Z.-J.; Xu, K.-Q. Characterization of Anaerobic Degradability and Kinetics of Harvested Submerged Aquatic Weeds Used for Nutrient Phytoremediation. Energies 2015, 8, 304-318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010304

AMA Style

Kobayashi T, Wu Y-P, Lu Z-J, Xu K-Q. Characterization of Anaerobic Degradability and Kinetics of Harvested Submerged Aquatic Weeds Used for Nutrient Phytoremediation. Energies. 2015; 8(1):304-318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kobayashi, Takuro, Ya-Peng Wu, Zhi-Jiang Lu, and Kai-Qin Xu. 2015. "Characterization of Anaerobic Degradability and Kinetics of Harvested Submerged Aquatic Weeds Used for Nutrient Phytoremediation" Energies 8, no. 1: 304-318. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010304

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop