Next Article in Journal
Comparison Study on Two Model-Based Adaptive Algorithms for SOC Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization of Trigeneration Plants Based on Metaheuristics
Previous Article in Journal
Kinetic Modeling of Ethanol Batch Fermentation by Escherichia Coli FBWHR Using Hot-Water Sugar Maple Wood Extract Hydrolyzate as Substrate
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Polygeneration System Based on Multi-Input Chemical Looping Combustion
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2014, 7(12), 8427-8445; doi:10.3390/en7128427

Comparative Analysis of Power Plant Options for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)

Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6315, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 31 October 2014 / Revised: 2 December 2014 / Accepted: 10 December 2014 / Published: 17 December 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1746 KB, uploaded 17 March 2015]   |  

Abstract

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) extract heat from underground hot dry rock (HDR) by first fracturing the HDR and then circulating a geofluid (typically water) into it and bringing the heated geofluid to a power plant to generate electricity. This study focuses on analysis, examination, and comparison of leading geothermal power plant configurations with a geofluid temperature from 200 to 800 °C, and also analyzes the embodied energy of EGS surface power plants. The power generation analysis is focused on flash type cycles for using subcritical geofluid (<374 °C) and expansion type cycles for using supercritical geofluid (>374 °C). Key findings of this study include: (i) double-flash plants have 24.3%–29.0% higher geofluid effectiveness than single-flash ones, and 3%–10% lower specific embodied energy; (ii) the expansion type plants have geofluid effectiveness > 750 kJ/kg, significantly higher than flash type plants (geofluid effectiveness < 300 kJ/kg) and the specific embodied energy is lower; (iii) to increase the turbine outlet vapor fraction from 0.75 to 0.90, we include superheating by geofluid but that reduces the geofluid effectiveness by 28.3%; (iv) for geofluid temperatures above 650 °C, double-expansion plants have a 2% higher geofluid effectiveness and 5%–8% lower specific embodied energy than single-expansion ones. View Full-Text
Keywords: engineered geothermal system (EGS); flash type power plants; expansion type power plants; plant utilization efficiency; geofluid effectiveness; plant embodied energy engineered geothermal system (EGS); flash type power plants; expansion type power plants; plant utilization efficiency; geofluid effectiveness; plant embodied energy
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Lior, N. Comparative Analysis of Power Plant Options for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). Energies 2014, 7, 8427-8445.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top