Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Heating Efficiency of a Single-Well Geothermal System in the Cold Region of Northeast China
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhancing Smart Home Design with AI Models: A Case Study of Living Spaces Implementation Review
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Multi-Objective Optimal Design of a Shell-and-Tube Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage Device
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advanced Insulation Materials for Facades: Analyzing Detachments Using Numerical Simulations and Infrared Thermography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Cleaning Mortar Façades with Addition of Anatase and Rutile Titanium Dioxide for Cool Façades

by
Eduardo Linhares Qualharini
1,*,
Carina Mariane Stolz
1,
Matheus Martini
2,
Eduardo Polesello
3 and
Clara Rocha da Silva
4
1
Escola Politécnica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil
2
Onex Engenharia, Novo Hamburgo 93546-010, Brazil
3
Instituto de Ciências Criativas e Tecnológicas, Universidade FEEVALE, Novo Hamburgo 93300-000, Brazil
4
Programa de Engenharia Ambiental, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(4), 1874; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041874
Submission received: 29 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 4 February 2023 / Published: 14 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart and Innovative Solutions for Adaptive Facade Systems)

Abstract

:
The concern with the best energy performance of buildings is a current theme, and construction materials that bring improvements to the performance of buildings and their surroundings are in demand. Façades play a crucial role in regulating the temperature within buildings by permitting or obstructing the transfer of heat and also affect the ambient temperature. Light-colored façades help maintain environments with milder temperatures, but pollution, rain, and other degrading agents darken the colors of the façades, reducing their capacity of sunlight reflection. In this scenario, the present study analyzed the addition of different types of titanium dioxide, anatase and rutile, in cement tiles for building façades, combining the ease and speed of assembly with the self-cleaning effects of photocatalysis. The 1 cm thick tiles were produced with a 1:3 mortar ratio (cement:sand/dry aggregate) with a 0.5 water:cement ratio and the addition of 0.3% polypropylene fiber. Different admixture levels (0%, 5%, and 10%) of rutile and anatase titanium dioxide were used. The samples were tested for flexural strength, absorption, permeability, and photocatalysis effect by observing the color change and surface characteristics of the boards using a spectrophotometer. In addition, the hygroscopicity was analyzed through a water drop, using a goniometer. The results obtained showed that cement tiles with 5% titanium dioxide, which influences the color variation of the tiles, meet the regulatory requirements for use in outside environments. Thus, these materials have the potential to be used as cool façades since, by keeping their color lighter, the materials can reflect sunlight, therefore keeping lower temperatures inside the building, and, consequently, minimizing the heat island effect.

1. Introduction

A report published by the United Nations [1] presented the perspective that two-thirds of the world’s population will be living in metropolitan areas by 2050, thus aggravating urban concentration. As a result, the regional climate changes will intensify and there will be a greater necessity for innovative and higher-quality construction systems. Thus, the worldwide trend is that the impact of these characteristics, as decisive factors in the choice of systems, components, and elements, is increasing, and that is why the advancement of the engineering and architecture areas must be aligned with those requirements [2].
In this scenario, there are traditional buildings that need to be optimized, particularly their façades, since most of the coatings used in this area require constant maintenance, which, if not carried out, will wear out the aesthetic, structural, and even safety aspects of a building. In addition, buildings in urban environments quickly stain because of deposits of particulate matter, in addition to the quite common darkened contours [3]. Furthermore, the constant need for interventions in the building after its completion is a rework that does not match the global trends of optimized processes over façade systems that use cement tiles, including the use, by the construction sector nowadays, of nanomaterials because of their special properties that can provide greater durability, fire resistance, thermal stability, and self-cleaning. As for the last property, the application of self-cleaning agents as well as photocatalytic coatings on the surface of construction elements can reduce the degradation generated by the environment in which they are inserted [4]. The principle that guides the photocatalysis process is based on the transfer of electrons between the valence and conduction band layers, opening oxidizing empty spaces and releasing reducing electrons. This operation uses the characteristics of semiconductor materials, which have a gap between their valence and conduction layers. Upon receiving an excitation through irradiation, these materials present a decrease in this distance until eventually allowing the exchange of electrons from the valence layer to the conduction layer [5,6].
There are several chemical constituents such as metal oxides and sulfides whose addition can cause the reactions that allow the degradation of pollutants by photocatalysis due to their appropriate band gap and light absorption properties [7]. One of the main elements of these constituents is titanium dioxide (TiO2), which is an admixture used with mortars, concrete, and coatings [8,9]. In the presence of UV rays for a certain time, the material generates oxygen voids and hydroxyl radicals, creating changes in the contact angle between the water droplets and the surface [7]. In an application with atmospheric exposure, after degradation of the pollutants, the hydrophilicity generated by the reaction to UV rays allows a superficial washing, since the water starts to percolate through the material, taking the pollutants with it.
Studies in the area, such as those presented in [3,9,10], make use of the anatase titanium dioxide. However, its availability in the Brazilian market is limited, which makes rutile titanium dioxide an alternative, especially as some authors, such as Poon and Chueng [11] and Ibrahim et al. [12], achieved good results with this material active in the photocatalysis process.
The photocatalytic coating resulting from the addition of TiO2 can sustain sunlight reflectance of building façades, making it more advantageous by keeping their initial high values of sunlight reflectance for longer periods, in addition to preventing overheating of surfaces exposed to the sun. Importantly, these benefits decay over time due to exposure to the environment [4].
In view of the above characteristics, cement materials with TiO2 are cold materials, which are generally defined as all materials or paints capable of keeping lower surface temperatures, compared to the traditional ones, absorbing and storing reduced amounts of sunlight radiation or increasing water evaporation [13].
According to Croce et al. [13], cold materials are characterized by high sunlight reflectivity and high infrared emissivity. Such functions help to lower the surface temperature, in this case, the façades, reducing the convection of heat from the site to the atmosphere and thus reducing the air temperature. Mansouri et al. [14] show that great interest was directed to surface materials, especially those that have high reflectivity, that is, high albedo to minimize the absorption of solar radiation and, therefore, reduce its restitution in long wavelengths at night.
Some research has already proven the positive effect of reflective materials in moderating the urban microclimate, and there is a gap as to their effect on the indoor environment and energy consumption of buildings.
Designers and architects tend to adopt a reduced palette of colors on building façades to benefit from the energy gains from their high sunlight reflectance. This feature can be increased with coatings in light or reflective colors applied to roofs, floors, or walls [15]. Yuxuan et al. explain that cold materials can contribute from 11% to 27% reduction in peak-hour cooling demand [16].
In this scenario, this paper aims at the production of cement tiles for façades, focusing on improving building thermal comfort with a mixture of two types of titanium dioxide (TiO2), the rutile and the anatase, in different contents, to achieve photocatalysis on the finished product, thus preserving the reflective characteristics designed for façades.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental program was designed for identifying the effectiveness of photocatalysis when different percentages of titanium dioxide (TiO2) are added to cement tiles. To this end, cement tiles were produced with two types of titanium dioxide admixtures, namely rutile and anatase, both at 5% and 10% ratios, besides the reference tiles, without TiO2. The physical properties and the flexural strength of the produced materials were evaluated in the fresh and hardened states. The samples were subjected to the staining agents methylene blue and rhodamine B, and then they were exposed to ultraviolet and urban environments for curing. Finally, a water drop was subjected to readings of color variation and contact angle, as shown schematically in Figure 1.
According to the ratios used by other studies, such as those of Jimenez-Relinque et al. [17] and Cárdenas et al. [18], the cement tiles were produced with a 1:3 ratio (cement:sand, dry materials, by volume, converted into mass) with a 0.5 water:cement ratio. The percentage of polypropylene fiber was set at 0.3%, as it showed an excellent viability in the study by Mohseni et al. [19], which used the same fiber type.
The percentages of titanium dioxide were adopted based on the choices and results of other studies, highlighting Cárdenas et al. [18], Diamanti et al. [20], and Shen et al. [21], and set at 0% for the standard sample and up to 5% and 10% of the amount of cement.
The thickness of the tiles was defined as 1.0 cm based on the thicknesses of cement tiles commonly available for external applications, made by Brazilian and international manufacturers such as INFIBRA [22], BRASILIT [23], and Valcan [24].

2.1. Materials

The production of cement tiles used CPB-40 white Portland cement, with a specific mass of 3.0 g/cm3, according to the results obtained in laboratory tests. The properties of the cement are presented in Table 1, according to the manufacturer’s information.
The small aggregate used to confer the white color to the tiles was fine white sand, commonly known as lagoon sand. The characterization of this material showed that the sand has a 1.03 fineness modulus, a 0.6 mm maximum characteristic dimension, and a 2.62 g/cm3 of specific mass.
The polypropylene fiber used is 12 mm long and 18 µm in diameter, as shown in Figure 2. According to the manufacturer, its tensile strength is from 500 to 600 MPa, and its specific weight is 0.91 g/cm3. Tap water coming from the municipal distribution network was used to produce the cement tiles.
The anatase and rutile titanium dioxides used in the manufacturing process were purchased in powder, the main characteristics of which can be seen in Table 2, as provided by the manufacturer.
To obtain the adequate workability of the mortar to produce the boards, a superplasticizer additive was used, based on the chemical polycarboxylate, with a density between 1.067 and 1.107 g/cm3, pH between 5.0 and 7.0, and solids between 38% and 42%.

2.2. Methodology of Tests Performed

The production of mortars followed a mixing methodology adapted from the NBR 7215 [25]. The fibers were manually dispersed and mixed with the sand, while the titanium dioxide was mixed with water and kept in constant movement until its use. First, cement and water with TiO2 were added to the mortar mixer and then mixed for 30 s at low speed. Then, the sand with the fibers was added to the mixture during a period of 30 s, as indicated by the standard, followed by a 90 s rest, and then went through a final 60 s mixing at high speed.
In the fresh state, the mortars were characterized according to their consistency index, so that the superplasticizer admixture content was dosed in amounts between 13 g and 13.5 g so that they reached values between 260 mm ± 5 mm, as indicated by the NBR 13276 [26]. The mass density in the fresh state was carried out following the provisions of the NBR 13278 standard [27].
The molding of specimens for carrying out the tests in the hardened state was carried out in wooden molds painted with gray acrylic paint to reduce water absorption. The dimensions of the specimens followed the determinations of current regulations: 60 × 10 × 1 cm3 for permeability, 22 × 10 × 1 cm3 for flexural strength, and 10 × 10 × 1 cm3 for the other ones. After molding, the specimens were kept in the molds for three days until they were demolded.
Tests carried out on the hardened cement tiles followed the NBR 15498 standard [28]. The specimens used followed the minimum dimensions recommended by the norm for standard procedures, and three samples were molded for each of the analyses carried out, making it possible to perform a comparative average. The tests carried out in accordance with this standard were flexural tensile strength, water absorption, permeability, and dimensional variation, all at 30 days of age, due to the availability of equipment for their realization.
The flexural tensile strength test was carried out in the unsaturated state, cured at a temperature of 23 ± 10 °C and relative humidity of 50 ± 20%, and the saturated state, stored for 24 h immersed in water.
To evaluate the photocatalysis, staining tests were performed and the contact angle of a water drop on the samples was measured.
For the staining test, the rhodamine B admixture was used, as indicated by the international standard UNI 11259 [29], and methylene blue was used, as indicated by the ASTM C1378 standard [30]. According to the use by similar studies, such as those of Pozo-Antonio and Dionisio [3] and Rosales et al. [31], 0.5 g/L rhodamine B and 1% methylene blue concentrations were defined. The admixtures were applied with a syringe in an amount of 0.5 mL of each substance in each specimen. To ensure uniform dispersion throughout the material, the liquid was spread over the analysis region with a brush.
For comparative purposes, each specimen was divided into three strips of the same size; the substances for staining were applied to two of them, and the third was used as a reference, without staining. Figure 3 exemplifies the staining of the tiles.
After staining, the specimens were subjected to different exposure environments. Some of the specimens were taken to a chamber completely sealed from UVA radiation, containing six USHIO 30 W lamps and a 365 nm peak wavelength (Figure 4), and some of the specimens were exposed to the open air, in an urban environment and close to the flow of vehicles (Figure 5). They were arranged in a position with constant sunlight incidence, with the chosen angle of inclination (0°).
Exposure to UVA radiation is justified by the fact that photocatalysis, unlike wetting, is not based only on repelling dirt with water, but rather on reacting with UV radiation from sunlight [20] so that there is a decomposition of pollutants that deposit on the tile.
Changes in color of the tiles exposed to UVA radiation were analyzed before exposure and after 46 h of exposure, due to equipment availability times. The tiles exposed to the urban environment were submitted to measurements at 0 and 49 days, being limited to this maximum period according to the availability of equipment.
The spectrophotometer used was a Delta Vista brand, model 450 G, with 45/0° optical geometry. The number of measurements per stain remained constant, with 3 measurement points on each substance and 3 measurements on the reference range. To standardize the color measurement points and to ensure that the readings were always performed in the same place on the tiles, a template was made in a 3D printer with the opening of the equipment used, allowing accuracy and guaranteeing that the same points were analyzed in each reading. Figure 6 shows the reading being performed on one of the specimens, with the spectrophotometer using the printed support.
The results obtained through measurements with the equipment convert the coloring to numerical format, in the CIELAB system. This system has three axes, like a coordinate system, in which the vertical axis (L) is represented in an increasing way from black to white, and the axes of the horizontal plane are represented by the variations from green to red (a) and from the blue to yellow (b). The difference between the colors obtained in the L × a × b coordinates at two different times is given through the color variation (ΔE), a property that will be used to compare the staining of the cement tiles.
To measure the contact angle, the Dataphysics OCA15EC goniometer equipment was used. The test consists of observing and measuring the contact angle formed by a water drop when it falls on the study tile. The contact angle was analyzed in two moments: in an initial reading, and after irradiating the tile in a UV chamber for periods of 22 h.
The analysis of results was performed using analysis of variance, in the Statistica software, version 10, with 95% reliability, in order to assess whether the response variables were statistically influenced by the controllable variables.
For a visual qualitative analysis of the distribution of TiO2 in the cementitious matrix and aiming to analyze the interaction of the paste with the fibers and the behavior of the composite as a whole, images of scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) were obtained, using a JEOL JSM-6510LV instrument.

3. Results

To facilitate the presentation of results, the following nomenclature will be used for cement tiles: REF, for reference; 5A and 10A for 5% and 10% TiO2 anatase admixtures, respectively; and 5R and 10R, for 5% and 10% TiO2 rutile admixtures, respectively.
In the fresh state, the density of the mortar with which the tiles were produced was determined, verifying that all mixtures presented density values between 2.01 and 2.08 g/cm3, demonstrating that the titanium dioxide admixture did not seem to have influenced this property of the material.
Table 3 presents the average results of three determinations obtained in the tests in the hardened state of the cement tiles.
The permeability test is carried out by analyzing the underside of the tile exposed to a layer of water, which, for positive results, must not show drop formation, but may show signs of moisture. All cement tiles were approved in terms of permeability, as none showed drop formation (“not present”). Only the reference tile, without the TiO2 admixture, showed “moisture” marks on the side opposite to contact with water, indicating the improvement in the efficiency of the tiles with the admixture, in terms of their tightness.
As for dimensional variation, the regulations do not have limits; however, it is observed that in the Brazilian market, the range of dimensional variation is between 2.0 and 2.7 mm/m, BRASILIT [23] and INFIBRA [22]. Thus, it appears that the cement tiles with the greatest variations were those produced with rutile titanium dioxide, reaching values above 3 mm/m.
As for water absorption, it appears that the addition of TiO2 reduced absorption, most likely due to the presence of finer substances that help to close capillary pores. The anatase titanium dioxide admixture decreased water absorption more, compared to rutile, most likely due to its greater fineness.
As for the average flexural tensile strength of the specimens, there was a greater reduction in tile strength with 10% rutile admixture (10R), with a reduction of approximately 20% in flexural tensile strength, in relation to the reference in the saturated and unsaturated states. Considering the criteria in the NBR 15498 [28], cement tiles must have at least 4 MPa of flexural tensile strength, so the tiles with 10% TiO2 admixture do not meet this requirement. Thus, the ideal would be to use a maximum of 5% admixture.
After the flexural tensile strength testing, the samples were submitted to a qualitative visual analysis of the distribution of TiO2 and fibers in the cementitious matrix. These scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, with 50× magnification, are shown in Figure 7a–e. The SEM images with 50× magnification made it possible to observe that in the reference sample (6a) there was an agglomeration of fine aggregate, indicating a lack of paste in the composite. The images with the presence of TiO2 rutile and anatase showed a homogeneous matrix without the presence of agglomerates, which indicates a good dispersion of the compound. Some pores were evident in the samples, and it was possible to observe in all of them that there was no agglomeration of fibers.

3.1. Photocatalysis Analysis

This item presents the results of staining analyses using a spectrophotometer, in all study conditions.
The cement tiles were stained with rhodamine B and methylene blue and then exposed to the urban environment and UVA radiation. Color variation (ΔE) of the tiles was evaluated using a spectrophotometer. The tiles exposed to UVA radiation were analyzed before exposure (0 h) and after 46 h of exposure. The tiles exposed to the urban environment were subjected to measurements at 0 and 49 days.
The spectrophotometer ΔE reading results, comparing the color at time zero with the color at the final reading, are fully presented in Appendix A, Table A1 and Table A2. With these results, a 95% confidence analysis on variance was carried out with the Statistica 10 Software, in which verification of the influence of the titanium dioxide levels and the curing and staining conditions of the cement tiles on the ΔE was performed.

3.1.1. Cement Tiles Exposed to the Urban Environment

Firstly, the color variations of cement tiles exposed to the urban environment will be presented, with an evaluation of color variation (ΔE) from day zero of exposure to the last day of exposure (day 49). Table 4 presents the main effects analysis of variance for the tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without methylene blue staining, and cured in an urban environment over time.
This analysis showed that the presence of methylene blue staining and the content of TiO2 rutile and anatase were significant in color variation over time. This behavior can be better visualized in Figure 8, which shows that the higher the TiO2 rutile content (Figure 8a), the greater the color variation observed in the tiles stained with methylene blue. Figure 8b shows that TiO2 anatase was efficient only with a higher content, 10%, regarding color variation. This fact suggests a greater efficiency of TiO2 rutile with lower contents, compared to anatase.
Table 5 presents the main effects analysis of variance for the tiles produced with rutile TiO2, with and without staining by rhodamine B, and submitted to curing in an urban environment over time. The color variation (ΔE) from day zero of exposure to the last day of exposure (49) was evaluated.
Table 6 and Figure 9, presented below, show that there was a significant influence of rutile TiO2 (Figure 9a), with no influence of anatase content (Figure 9b), on the staining and color variation of the tiles. Thus, it appears that the TiO2 anatase content was not significant in the color variation of the tiles stained by rhodamine B; i.e., it was not beneficial for their self-cleaning characteristic.
The images in Table 6 show the visual aspect of the cement tiles, before and after exposure to the urban environment, per the different stains and TiO2 contents.
Comparing the images, it is possible to see that methylene blue was more resistant to being removed from the plates than rhodamine B. This fact was reflected in the results of color variation read by the spectrophotometer.
For the reference specimens, without any type of TiO2, it is possible to observe that the stains were more resistant to being removed, and even rhodamine is visually visible until the 14th day and methylene blue is very evident until the 49th day. These facts underscore the efficiency of the presence of titanium dioxide in the self-cleaning effect of cementitious tiles.

3.1.2. Cement Tiles Exposed to a UVA Chamber

This section will present the color variations, which were evaluated before exposure and after 46 h of exposure, of cement tiles exposed to UVA radiation. Table 7 presents the main effects analysis of variance on the tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by methylene blue, and subjected to UVA radiation.
Table 8 presents the main effects analysis of variance on the tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by rhodamine B, and submitted to UVA radiation.
It is observed that, when 46 tiles were exposed to the UVA radiation in a chamber, the color variation on the analyzed tiles was not influenced by the TiO2 content in their composition.
The images in Table 9 show the visual aspect of the cement tiles, before and after exposure to the urban environment, per different stains and TiO2 contents.
Confirming what was presented in the statistical analysis, the images presented in Table 8 show that there was no great reduction in coloration with different levels of TiO2. It is observed that all samples stained with methylene blue showed a small reduction in color, while those stained with rhodamine B showed a greater loss of color, which was not enough to completely eliminate the pink color of the staining agent.

3.1.3. Evaluation of the Superficial Tension through Contact Angle

The contact angle tests were performed on aged (submerged in hot water for 56 days) and non-aged specimens, for comparative effects of the hydrophilicity of the samples.
The same procedures were performed after 24 h from the exposure to a 365 nm wavelength UVA light, to verify if the contact angle would have any alteration. The mean results regarding the contact angles and their drop-wetting visualization are shown in Table 10.
All results were in the range considered hydrophilic, i.e., less than 90°. This is excellent for working with photocatalysis because it allows the superficially accumulated dirt to be washed off. However, a more than 200% increase is observed in the contact angle of the tiles with TiO2 rutile in their composition, compared to the reference tiles. This may be an indication of changes in the surface tension of the tiles with an increased admixture of TiO2 rutile in their composition, which may impair the rolling of water droplets.

4. Discussion

The results of the tests of flexural strength efforts showed that the cement tiles with a 10% TiO2 admixture were the ones that presented the lowest flexural tensile strength, with up to 20% reduction, whereas the rutile showed the larger reductions. The tiles’ water absorption was reduced by the TiO2, when compared to the reference tiles, and the permeability was within the expected range, without the formation of water droplets.
When analyzing the staining of the tiles, it was verified that the methylene blue was more effective in demonstrating the efficiency of TiO2 than the rhodamine B. This is probably related to a greater color contrast of the methylene blue with the reference tile. As for the stains by methylene blue, it was observed that the presence of TiO2 was significant in the color variation after the tiles were exposed to the urban environment, thus demonstrating that environmental factors, such as rain, can corroborate the efficiency of maintenance of the tile color.
It was verified that there is a direct relationship between the rutile TiO2 content and the color variation. An increase in its addition caused a decrease in the staining; i.e., a 5% admixture reduced the staining on the tiles, and 10% admixture reduced the staining even more. The anatase, on the other hand, did not show a significant influence at 5% admixture, but a 10% admixture showed a significant influence on the staining reduction, showing a greater difference in color in contrast with the reference tiles without the TiO2 admixture.
When the samples were exposed to UVA radiation, it was not possible to observe the influence of TiO2 contents in their composition on color variation. This may have occurred due to the absence of running water (rainwater, for example) to carry away the particles. In this way, the UVA radiation reactive particles remained on the tiles.
It was observed that, with the TiO2 admixture, the reflectance and/or emittance of the tiles were preserved because of the staining reduction in contrast with the reference tiles, thus preserving the initial color of the surface, which leads to a lower temperature of the tiles and, therefore, of the place where they are installed.

5. Conclusions

The present study evaluated the influence of TiO2 rutile and anatase, both at 5% and 10%, on the self-cleaning capacity and on the photocatalysis of cement tiles for façades, focusing on the color maintenance and, consequently, on the sunlight reflection.
It was observed, at the end of the study, that these admixtures, up to 5% of the cement mortar, contributed to reaching the normative criteria for the flexural strength of the cement tiles and had a positive impact on the color variation of the tiles when submitted to the staining agent methylene blue and exposed to the urban environment. This fact positively influences the self-cleaning capacity of façades, and thus its capability of reducing stains helps to keep the façades cleaner, with lighter colors, benefiting the thermal comfort of the building and its surroundings.
As shown in the literature review, lighter colors have a greater capacity of reflecting sunlight, thus helping to reduce the temperature of the façades and, consequently, reducing the air temperature, contributing to mitigating the effects of urban heat islands.
Therefore, as a novel contribution, the present study states that the use of cement tiles with 5% rutile or anatase titanium dioxide can be beneficial for greater energy efficiency in buildings, contributing to their internal and external comfort, in addition to reducing maintenance and cleaning costs of buildings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.R.d.S.; methodology, M.M.; formal analysis, M.M. and C.M.S.; data curation, C.M.S. and E.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.R.d.S. and C.M.S.; writing—review and editing, C.R.d.S., E.L.Q. and C.M.S.; supervision, E.L.Q., E.P. and C.M.S.; project administration, E.L.Q. and C.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was partly financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Universidade FEEVALE and the Escola Politécnica of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro for technical support and physical space for the experimental program execution and the analysis of results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Color variation of cement tiles after UVA curing.
Table A1. Color variation of cement tiles after UVA curing.
UVA Cure
SampleCPΔE Point 1ΔE Point 2ΔE Point 3Average ΔE
ReferenceUVAREFCP1−1.20−0.25−0.661.39
UVAREFCP2−3.630.310.343.66
UVA5RCP1−1.43−0.97−0.451.79
UVA5RCP2−0.85−0.250.611.08
UVA10RCP1−0.630.270.881.12
UVA10RCP2−0.100.932.863.01
UVA5ACP1−1.31−0.240.041.34
UVA5ACP2−2.490.470.792.66
UVA10ACP10.04−0.350.110.37
UVA10ACP21.40−0.460.131.48
Methylene blueUVAREFCP10.46−3.113.754.89
UVAREFCP25.75−14.168.9217.70
UVA5RCP10.35−1.924.755.14
UVA5RCP2−1.24−1.426.987.23
UVA10RCP11.43−3.985.306.78
UVA10RCP25.53−7.7310.0513.83
UVA5ACP10.90−2.124.575.11
UVA5ACP22.62−4.077.979.32
UVA10ACP11.69−3.076.737.59
UVA10ACP29.40−4.2610.7714.91
Rhodamine BUVAREFCP12.75−5.595.818.52
UVAREFCP21.08−3.037.077.77
UVA5RCP16.60−21.5211.0625.08
UVA5RCP26.06−19.2411.7223.33
UVA10RCP16.34−17.129.0320.37
UVA10RCP25.39−15.9110.4819.80
UVA5ACP15.09−18.536.9420.43
UVA5ACP24.03−17.717.7819.76
UVA10ACP14.47−17.658.1419.95
UVA10ACP27.99−18.436.7821.20
Table A2. Color variation of cement tiles after exposure to an urban environment.
Table A2. Color variation of cement tiles after exposure to an urban environment.
Curing in an Urban Environment
SampleCPΔE Point 1ΔE Point 2ΔE Point 3Average ΔE
ReferenceREFCP11.031.271.451.25
REFCP20.700.811.581.03
REFCP32.412.062.152.21
5RCP10.560.330.500.46
5RCP21.410.570.480.82
5RCP30.760.480.950.73
10RCP11.983.974.083.34
10RCP21.463.722.072.42
10RCP31.342.673.402.47
5ACP19.190.865.475.17
5ACP20.442.135.182.58
5ACP30.470.172.871.17
10ACP12.121.941.901.99
10ACP21.872.681.241.93
10ACP31.222.651.821.89
Methylene blueREFCP154.3461.4756.1557.32
REFCP253.2464.7056.1858.04
REFCP358.4661.6055.4058.49
5RCP163.3865.4860.2563.04
5RCP251.5262.4364.0459.33
5RCP366.2558.6765.5563.49
10RCP158.2257.5772.1662.65
10RCP259.1659.1569.6862.66
10RCP365.3655.6963.6261.56
5ACP150.0661.7556.3456.05
5ACP253.2259.0360.3057.52
5ACP358.7446.2364.6356.53
10ACP164.7967.9967.4466.74
10ACP267.0567.8069.3668.07
10ACP358.6864.3569.3464.12
Rhodamine BREFCP147.3754.7947.7449.97
REFCP245.2852.7147.4148.46
REFCP344.2947.8145.2745.79
5RCP134.1034.0238.3935.50
5RCP239.1235.5138.0137.55
5RCP341.9044.5049.5845.33
10RCP141.1239.5445.9242.19
10RCP245.2146.8242.9144.98
10RCP342.3241.3243.0242.22
5ACP137.0843.2340.3540.22
5ACP237.3939.2438.2538.29
5ACP344.9443.5739.5242.68
10ACP150.1743.8344.1646.06
10ACP252.1651.9250.2951.46
10ACP351.9345.9446.8148.23

References

  1. UN (United Nations). Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/topics/sustainable-cities-and-human-settlements (accessed on 20 December 2022).
  2. Yi, Y.K. Building Facade Multi-Objective Optimization for Daylight and Aesthetical Perception. Build. Environ. 2019, 156, 178–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pozo-Antonio, J.S.; Dionísio, A. Self-Cleaning Property of Mortars with TiO2 Addition Using Real Diesel Exhaust Soot. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dantas, S.R.A.; Vittorino, F.; Loh, K. Comparison of Reflectance to Solar Radiation between Mortars Treated with TiO2 and Painted Mortars after Three Years of Exposure. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 46, 103829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schreck, M.; Niederberger, M. Photocatalytic Gas Phase Reactions. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 597–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sakar, M.; Mithun Prakash, R.; Trong-On, D. Insights into the Tio2-Based Photocatalytic Systems and Their Mechanisms. Catalysts 2019, 9, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Krishnan, V. Perovskite Oxide Based Materials for Energy and Environment-Oriented Photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 10253–10315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, S.; Park, J.S.; Ishihara, T. A Review of the Single-Step Flame Synthesis of Defective and Heterostructured TiO2 Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Applications. Catalysts 2023, 13, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Zheng, L.; Jones, M.R.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalytic Concrete for NOx Abatement: Supported TiO2 Efficiencies and Impacts. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 116, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Constantino, J.C.P.; Garcia, D.C.S.; Palhares, H.G.; Houmard, M.; Figueiredo, R.B. Development of Functional TiO2 Coatings Deposited on Cementitious Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 250, 118732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poon, C.S.; Cheung, E. NO Removal Efficiency of Photocatalytic Paving Blocks Prepared with Recycled Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1746–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ibrahim, A.; Phoohinkong, W.; Mekprasart, W.; Pecharapa, W. Anatase/Rutile TiO2 Composite Thin Films Prepared via Dip Coating Technique and Their Hydrophilicity, Stability and Photocatalytic Activity. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 10903–10909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Croce, S.; D’Agnolo, E.; Caini, M.; Paparella, R. The Use of Cool Pavements for the Regeneration of Industrial Districts. Sustain. 2021, 13, 6322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mansouri, O.; Belarbi, R.; Bourbia, F. Albedo Effect of External Surfaces on the Energy Loads and Thermal Comfort in Buildings. Energy Procedia 2017, 139, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ramos, N.M.M.; Souza, A.R.; Maia, J.; Almeida, R.M.S.F. Colour Degradation of Façade Coatings - The Effect of Nanopigments Incorporation. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 172, 24004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yuxuan, Z.; Yunyun, Z.; Jianrong, Y.; Xiaoqiang, Z. Energy Saving Performance of Thermochromic Coatings with Different Colors for Buildings. Energy Build. 2020, 215, 109920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jimenez-Relinque, E.; Rodriguez-Garcia, J.R.; Castillo, A.; Castellote, M. Characteristics and Efficiency of Photocatalytic Cementitious Materials: Type of Binder, Roughness and Microstructure. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 71, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cárdenas, C.; Tobón, J.I.; García, C.; Vila, J. Functionalized Building Materials: Photocatalytic Abatement of NO x by Cement Pastes Blended with TiO2 Nanoparticles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 36, 820–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mohseni, E.; Khotbehsara, M.M.; Naseri, F.; Monazami, M.; Sarker, P. Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Cement Mortars Containing Rice Husk Ash and Nano-Alumina. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diamanti, M.V.; Del Curto, B.; Ormellese, M.; Pedeferri, M.P. Photocatalytic and Self-Cleaning Activity of Colored Mortars Containing TiO2. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 46, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; Cao, L.; Ye, J. Preparation of Titanium Dioxide Nano Particle Modified Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning Concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 762–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Infibra. Manual de Instalação—Placas Cimentícias NTF; Infibra: Leme, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  23. Brasilit. Catálogo de Produtos Brasilit: Soluções Para Telhados e Construções Industrializadas; Brasilit: Brasilit, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Valcan. Ceramapanel Technical Information A1; Valcan: Bridgwater, UK, 2022; pp. 3–4. [Google Scholar]
  25. NBR 7215; Cimento Portland―Determinação Da Resistência à Compressão de Corpos de Prova Cilíndricos. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2019.
  26. NBR 13276; Argamassa Para Assentamento e Revestimento de Paredes e Tetos—Determinação Do Índice de Consistência. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2016.
  27. NBR 13278; Argamassa Para Assentamento e Revestimento de Paredes e Tetos—Determinação Da Densidade de Massa e Do Teor de Ar Incorporado. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2005.
  28. NBR 15498; Placa de Fibrocimento Sem Amianto—Requisitos e Métodos de Ensaio. ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021.
  29. UNI 11259; Photocatalysis—Determination of the Photocatalytic Activity of Hidraulic Binders—Rodammina Test Method. UNI: Milan, Italy, 2016.
  30. ASTM C1378-04(2014); Standard Test Method for Determination of Resistance to Staining. American National Standards Institute: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
  31. Rosales, A.; Maury-Ramírez, A.; De Gutiérrez, R.M.; Guzmán, C.; Esquivel, K. SiO2@TiO2 Coating: Synthesis, Physical Characterization and Photocatalytic Evaluation. Coatings 2018, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental program.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental program.
Energies 16 01874 g001
Figure 2. Dimensions and visual appearance of the polypropylene fiber used in the study.
Figure 2. Dimensions and visual appearance of the polypropylene fiber used in the study.
Energies 16 01874 g002
Figure 3. Tiles stained by rhodamine B and methylene blue.
Figure 3. Tiles stained by rhodamine B and methylene blue.
Energies 16 01874 g003
Figure 4. Tiles stained by rhodamine B and methylene blue exposed to UVA radiation.
Figure 4. Tiles stained by rhodamine B and methylene blue exposed to UVA radiation.
Energies 16 01874 g004
Figure 5. Tiles stained by rhodamine B and methylene blue exposed to the urban environment.
Figure 5. Tiles stained by rhodamine B and methylene blue exposed to the urban environment.
Energies 16 01874 g005
Figure 6. Color measurement with spectrophotometer using template for standardization.
Figure 6. Color measurement with spectrophotometer using template for standardization.
Energies 16 01874 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, with 50x magnification: (a) REF, (b) 5R, (c) 10R, (d) 5A, (e) 10A.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, with 50x magnification: (a) REF, (b) 5R, (c) 10R, (d) 5A, (e) 10A.
Energies 16 01874 g007
Figure 8. Analysis of the influence of TiO2 content, with and without staining by methylene blue, cured in an urban environment over time: (a) rutile, (b) anatase.
Figure 8. Analysis of the influence of TiO2 content, with and without staining by methylene blue, cured in an urban environment over time: (a) rutile, (b) anatase.
Energies 16 01874 g008
Figure 9. Analysis of the influence of TiO2 content, with and without staining by rhodamine B, cured in an urban environment over time: (a) rutile, (b) anatase.
Figure 9. Analysis of the influence of TiO2 content, with and without staining by rhodamine B, cured in an urban environment over time: (a) rutile, (b) anatase.
Energies 16 01874 g009
Table 1. Properties of the CPB-40 white Portland cement.
Table 1. Properties of the CPB-40 white Portland cement.
PropertyResultsNBR 16697-2018 Limits
Fire loss≤5%≤12%
Insoluble residue≤5%≤3.5%
Sulfate content≤4%≤4%
Chloride content≤0.1%≤0.1%
Set time≥45 min≥60 min
Expandability≤10 mm≤5 mm
Compressive strength—2 days>37 MPa>15 MPa
Compressive strength—28 days≥60 MPa≥40 MPa
Note: Manufacturer information.
Table 2. Properties of the anatase and rutile titanium dioxide.
Table 2. Properties of the anatase and rutile titanium dioxide.
Physical–Chemical CharacteristicsAnataseRutile
Titanium dioxide concentration (%)99.1096.3
Evaporated material (%, 105 °C)0.200.26
pH in aqueous solution7.77.3
Oil absorption (g/100 g)2419.2
Fineness (% retained on a 45 μm sieve)0.030.05
Table 3. Physical properties and flexural strength of cement tiles produced with different contents of anatase and rutile titanium dioxide.
Table 3. Physical properties and flexural strength of cement tiles produced with different contents of anatase and rutile titanium dioxide.
Cement TilePermeability
(Qualitative)
Dimensional Variation (mm/m)Water Absorption (%)Flexural Tensile Strength (MPa)
X AxisY AxisNot SaturatedSaturated
REFMoisture2.492.907.174.274.06
5ANot present2.021.946.084.154.04
10ANot present2.122.906.113.913.27
5RNot present3.022.866.674.254.12
10RNot present2.843.196.523.423.16
Table 4. Main effects analysis of variance for tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without methylene blue staining, cured in an urban environment over time.
Table 4. Main effects analysis of variance for tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without methylene blue staining, cured in an urban environment over time.
TiO2VariableSSDFMSFcalcp-FactorSignificative
RutileStaining 15,714.69115,714.697035.7210.000000Yes
TiO2 (%)23.56211.785.2730.019635Yes
Error31.27142.23
AnataseStaining15,234.43115,234.431927.0170.000000Yes
TiO2 (%)75.50237.754.7750.026243Yes
Error110.68147.91
SS: sum of squares, DF: degrees of freedom, MS: mean squares; Fcalc: calculated F-value.
Table 5. Main effects analysis of variance for tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by rhodamine B, cured in an urban environment over time.
Table 5. Main effects analysis of variance for tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by rhodamine B, cured in an urban environment over time.
TiO2VariableSSDFMSFcalcp-FactorSignificative
RutileStaining7906.95017906.950922.3010.000000Yes
TiO2 (%)67.882233.9413.9590.043379Yes
Error120.023148.573
AnataseStaining8534.2818534.28941.7920.000000Yes
TiO2 (%)45.23222.622.4960.118295No
Error126.86149.06
SS: sum of squares, DF: degrees of freedom, MS: mean squares; Fcalc: calculated F-value.
Table 6. Visual aspect of cement tiles, before and after exposure to the urban environment, per different stains and TiO2 contents.
Table 6. Visual aspect of cement tiles, before and after exposure to the urban environment, per different stains and TiO2 contents.
No StainingMethylene BlueRhodamine B
REFEnergies 16 01874 i001Energies 16 01874 i002Energies 16 01874 i003
5AEnergies 16 01874 i004Energies 16 01874 i005Energies 16 01874 i006
10AEnergies 16 01874 i007Energies 16 01874 i008Energies 16 01874 i009
5REnergies 16 01874 i010Energies 16 01874 i011Energies 16 01874 i012
10REnergies 16 01874 i013Energies 16 01874 i014Energies 16 01874 i015
Table 7. Main effects analysis of variance on tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by methylene blue, subjected to UVA radiation.
Table 7. Main effects analysis of variance on tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by methylene blue, subjected to UVA radiation.
TiO2VariableSSDGFMSFp-FactorSignificative
RutileStaining157.83251157.832510.245680.012596Yes
TiO2 (%)21.0350210.51750.682740.532401No
Error123.2384815.4048
AnataseStaining196.99201196.992011.631580.009216Yes
TiO2 (%)10.891225.44560.321540.733982No
Error135.4877816.9360
Table 8. Main effects analysis of variance on tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by rhodamine B, subjected to UVA radiation.
Table 8. Main effects analysis of variance on tiles produced with TiO2 rutile and anatase, with and without staining by rhodamine B, subjected to UVA radiation.
TiO2VariableSSDGFMSFp-FactorSignificative
RutileStaining717.9631717.96335.150200.000350Yes
TiO2 (%)122.690261.3453.003360.106418No
Error163.405820.426
AnataseStaining626.84111626.841140.557310.000216Yes
TiO2 (%)82.7245241.36232.676180.128863No
Error123.6455815.4557
Table 9. Visual appearance of cement tiles, before and after exposure to UVA radiation, per different stains and TiO2 contents.
Table 9. Visual appearance of cement tiles, before and after exposure to UVA radiation, per different stains and TiO2 contents.
REF5A10A5R10R
0 h48 h0 h48 h0 h48 h0 h48 h0 h48 h
No staining Energies 16 01874 i016Energies 16 01874 i017Energies 16 01874 i018Energies 16 01874 i019Energies 16 01874 i020
Methylene blueEnergies 16 01874 i021Energies 16 01874 i022Energies 16 01874 i023Energies 16 01874 i024Energies 16 01874 i025
Rhodamine B Energies 16 01874 i026Energies 16 01874 i027Energies 16 01874 i028Energies 16 01874 i029Energies 16 01874 i030
Table 10. Contact angle of a water drop on the surface of a cement tile, before and after application of UVA light, under air conditioned curing and accelerated aging.
Table 10. Contact angle of a water drop on the surface of a cement tile, before and after application of UVA light, under air conditioned curing and accelerated aging.
CPInitial Reading (°)Reading after Application of UVA Light (°)
Air Conditioned AgedAir ConditionedAged
REFEnergies 16 01874 i031
22.05
Energies 16 01874 i032
27.25
Energies 16 01874 i033
26.35
Energies 16 01874 i034
24.20
5REnergies 16 01874 i035
53.90
Energies 16 01874 i036
55.80
Energies 16 01874 i037
57.95
Energies 16 01874 i038
68.95
10REnergies 16 01874 i039
59.95
Energies 16 01874 i040
32.30
Energies 16 01874 i041
44.20
Energies 16 01874 i042
50.70
5AEnergies 16 01874 i043
21.60
Energies 16 01874 i044
28.90
Energies 16 01874 i045
24.25
Energies 16 01874 i046
32.75
10AEnergies 16 01874 i047
22.40
Energies 16 01874 i048
40.05
Energies 16 01874 i049
28.60
Energies 16 01874 i050
36.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qualharini, E.L.; Stolz, C.M.; Martini, M.; Polesello, E.; da Silva, C.R. Self-Cleaning Mortar Façades with Addition of Anatase and Rutile Titanium Dioxide for Cool Façades. Energies 2023, 16, 1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041874

AMA Style

Qualharini EL, Stolz CM, Martini M, Polesello E, da Silva CR. Self-Cleaning Mortar Façades with Addition of Anatase and Rutile Titanium Dioxide for Cool Façades. Energies. 2023; 16(4):1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041874

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qualharini, Eduardo Linhares, Carina Mariane Stolz, Matheus Martini, Eduardo Polesello, and Clara Rocha da Silva. 2023. "Self-Cleaning Mortar Façades with Addition of Anatase and Rutile Titanium Dioxide for Cool Façades" Energies 16, no. 4: 1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041874

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop