Next Article in Journal
Load Forecasting for a Campus University Using Ensemble Methods Based on Regression Trees
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Environmental Assessment Tool (SEAT): A Modeling Tool to Evaluate Potential Environmental Risks Associated with Wave Energy Converter Deployments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of SF6 Leakage from Gas Insulated Equipment on Electricity Networks in Great Britain

by
Phillip Widger
1,* and
Abderrahmane (Manu) Haddad
2
1
Advanced High Voltage Engineering Research Centre, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
2
Advanced High Voltage Engineering Research Centre, Cardiff University, The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2018, 11(8), 2037; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082037
Submission received: 10 July 2018 / Revised: 24 July 2018 / Accepted: 1 August 2018 / Published: 6 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section F: Electrical Engineering)

Abstract

:
This paper examines the data collected from the power industry over the last six years of actual reported emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and the potential impact. The SF6 emissions have been collated from the 14 different regions in England, Scotland, and Wales (Great Britain) from the six distribution network operators. The emissions of SF6 due to the transmission network of Great Britain have also been collated from the three different transmission network operators. By collecting this SF6 emissions data from the power industry, in both the distribution and transmission networks, an overall view of the scale of SF6 emissions in Great Britain can be evaluated. Data from the power industry also shows the inventory of SF6 power equipment in use over the last six years in Great Britain and shows the calculated percentage leakage rate of all of this equipment. In this paper, these figures, as reported by the electrical power industry to the UK government, have been used to estimate the likely inventory of SF6 equipment in England, Scotland, and Wales by 2050 and the future emissions of SF6 that could be leaked into the atmosphere by this equipment.

1. Introduction

This paper examines the reported emissions of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) from the power industry in Scotland, Wales, and England. In recent years, it had been concluded that SF6 is an extremely potent global warming gas and can have a significant impact on global warming if released into the environment. Previously, it was determined that SF6 has a global warming potential (GWP) of 22,800 times that of carbon dioxide (CO2) over a 100 year period, as used in EU and UK regulations [1,2,3]. However, more recent estimates put the GWP of SF6 at 23,500 times that of CO2 [4]. SF6 has an extremely long atmospheric lifetime of 3200 years [4] during which infrared radiation is reflected back towards earth when left in the atmosphere. The use of SF6 has been banned from applications where a suitable alternative can be provided and is classified as a regulated fluorinated greenhouse gas by both the EU and the UK [2,3]. SF6 is also listed in the United Nation’s Kyoto [5] and Paris agreements [6] as a gas deemed to have a high global warming impact and emissions, and, therefore, should be reduced.
SF6 exhibits extremely useful insulation characteristics that allow for its use in distribution and transmission equipment in the power network. It exhibits an insulation capability approximately three times that of air [7] and, therefore, it allows for compact gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) and gas-insulated lines (GIL) to be adopted. These are much smaller in size than air-insulated equipment [7]. SF6 equipment has a high safety service record when operating under high voltage stresses compared to oil- and air-insulated equipment [8] due to the use of leak detection equipment and its particular use at the medium voltage distribution level and above where the gas can be both indoors or outside. However, due to recent concerns over the environmental impact of SF6, distribution and transmission network operators have implemented schemes to reduce the impact of SF6 equipment by reducing the release of SF6 into the environment [9,10,11,12,13,14]. Stringent regulations, which require the reporting of leaks whenever they occur, have also been implemented in recent years as a result of the known impact of the global warming potential of SF6 [2,3,5,6]. Manufacturers of SF6 equipment play a key role in improving equipment gas seals and providing gas density sensors that allow for the constant monitoring of gas equipment on the power network. In recent years, it has become apparent that a new alternative, environmentally-friendly, gas is needed to replace SF6 entirely because of its inherent global warming potential. However, this has not been an easy task and, in the market at present, there is no alternative to SF6 that could directly replace it while fulfilling all its dielectric and interruption properties. Mixtures of SF6/N2 have also been proposed for insulation purposes only, however, SF6 is still a component meaning there is still an environmental impact and this mixture cannot carry out the high voltage interruption performance expected of pure SF6. Therefore, a large amount of distribution and transmission equipment still exists in the network today with a constant annual leakage rate that varies depending on the age and degradation of the equipment in use. It is of timely importance that how much SF6 is in use in the distribution and transmission networks, the amount of SF6 that leaks each year, and the potential impact this gas can contribute to global warming both now and in the future be evaluated.

2. SF6 Emissions and Calculated Equivalent CO2 Emissions

The data used in this paper is taken directly from reported emissions from distribution and transmission network operators. SF6 can be released into the atmosphere by accidental leakage due to faults and/or equipment degradation, which causes loss of gas from seals or sudden decompression [15]. SF6 leakage may also occur during normal operation due to vibrations and handling operations as equipment is decommissioned or maintenance is undertaken. The data used in this paper is often captured through SF6 maintenance top-ups which allows the operator to determine how much gas is needed to top-up a piece of equipment to its normal operating pressure and, therefore, how much gas has been lost [16]. Therefore, depending on the amount of maintenance required, the amount of SF6 emissions may vary.
The equivalent CO2 emissions in tonnes (tCO2e) can be directly converted from the SF6 emissions in kg by using the following equation [3]:
t C O 2 e = ( Mass   of   S F 6   Emissions   ( kg ) 1000 ) × GWP   of   S F 6 ,
This equation uses the quantity of SF6 in kg divided by 1000 to convert this number to tonnes, multiplied by the global warming potential (GWP) of SF6. The GWP scale factor used in this paper is 1 kg of SF6 being equivalent to 22,800 kg of CO2, as provided by the UK government, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) [3] and the European Union [2]. Over the reported years 2010–2014, a scale factor of 1 kg of SF6 to 23,900 kg of CO2 was previously used. However, this was changed in recent years to 22,800 [1]. The most recent reports suggest this equivalent ratio could actually be 23,500 [4]. In this paper, all data has been re-calculated for the scale factor 22,800 equivalency, even if they were originally reported using a different scale factor. Some reported emissions have discrepancies between source years. In these cases, the most up to date source has been used as some operators have re-calculated these numbers from new data. Some distribution network emissions of SF6 were given directly as tCO2e and have been calculated from this figure. All other equivalent CO2 emissions in this paper have been directly calculated from SF6 emissions (kg). The regulatory reporting year and the years shown in this paper occur between April and March of the following year rather than a complete calendar year. For example, for the year 2012–2013, the year reported is actually between April 2012 and March 2013.

3. Reported Emissions of SF6 in Great Britain between 2010 and 2016 by Distribution Network Area

The power distribution network is divided into 14 unique areas in Scotland, England, and Wales. These areas are shown in Figure 1a. The total amount of SF6 reported as emissions between 2010 and 2016 are shown in Table 1 [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. It is important to note that emissions of SF6 from the distribution network have fluctuated over the last six years with emissions both rising and falling over the period, as shown in Figure 1b. For the last six years, an average SF6 emission level of 1149 kg per year can be calculated for England, Scotland, and Wales combined.
The equivalent amount of CO2 that would need to be released into the atmosphere to have the same global warming potential as the amount of SF6 released is shown in Table 2. The equivalent CO2 emissions, shown in Table 2, have been calculated using a scale factor of 1:22,800. The equivalent average annual CO2 emissions that equate to 1149 kg of SF6 is 26,197 tonnes of CO2.
In Table 3, the inventory of SF6 equipment used in each distribution network area is collected and classified. Table 3 gives an account of the scale of gas-insulated power equipment that is required to maintain a safe and reliable electricity distribution network in England, Scotland, and Wales. In the future, if an environmentally-friendly alternative insulation medium is found to replace SF6, the gas inventory shown in Table 3 will need to be replaced with the new alternative gas. From Figure 1b, it can be shown that the amount of SF6-insulated distribution equipment on the network is still increasing steadily, with an average increase of 9401 kg of SF6 being introduced into the power distribution network every year. As the amount of SF6 in the distribution network increases, so too does the potential environmental impact this gas could pose if released.
In Table 4, the annual leak rate on the distribution network for each area is given. The annual leak rate is the calculated percentage of SF6 emissions in a given area against the total inventory held in that distribution network area. These calculations shows that the actual leakage rate per year of the total inventory held is quite low, with an average annual leak rate of 0.46% of the total SF6 inventory. This is possibly due to the work already carried out with gas handling procedures and equipment gas seals. However, modern distribution equipment installed in the network should have a leakage rate of 0.1% for a sealed pressure system [49]. Thus, a much higher leakage rate is actually being generated either through older equipment with poor gas seals, accidental gas leaks in gas handling operations, or equipment gas containment failure. It may also be the case that some of the older SF6 equipment in the distribution networks are of a closed pressure system type, such as those used in single-pressure circuit breakers, which have a much higher leakage threshold of between 0.5% and 1% per year [49].
In Table 5, the average annual SF6 emissions have been calculated for the years 2010–2016 for all of the distribution network areas. These annual average emissions of SF6 are shown on a map in Figure 2a with the colour scale representing the level of SF6 emissions. From the average emissions calculated, it can be shown that southern England and the south west of England have the largest emissions of SF6 from the gas insulation distribution equipment installed in these areas as the electricity network in these areas is extensive.
In Table 6, the amount of SF6 inventory on the distribution network is shown for each distribution area for the last reported year (2015–2016). The amount of SF6 inventory in the distribution network is also shown by location in Figure 2b. It can be noted that the highest inventory of SF6 equipment is in London and the lowest inventory is in North Scotland for distribution equipment. This is to be expected because SF6 equipment is often used in dense urban areas where space availability is limited and power requirements are higher. Given that SF6 equipment is often the most compact solution and has the smallest footprint requirement, its usage is highest in large cities, such as London. However, despite having the most SF6 insulated distribution equipment, the average SF6 emissions reported from the London area are small compared to other regions. It could be expected that the larger the amount of SF6 equipment in one area, the more likely the emissions of SF6 would be higher. However, the reported data shows that this is not always the case. For some areas, such as Southern England, the amount of SF6 inventory is quite high and the emissions are high, but for other areas, like London, the distribution equipment SF6 inventory is high but the emissions are low. Although it is difficult to determine trends, it is likely that either the SF6 equipment installed in London is newer than other areas and, therefore, has improved tight gas seals or that the equipment is more likely to be indoors rather than outdoors, like some rural networks. Therefore, the equipment is much less likely to suffer degradation and accidental gas release. It may also be true that the equipment is left for longer periods of time without maintenance so no log of emissions has been taken or, perhaps, maintenance occurs more often and, therefore, accidental emissions of SF6 are less likely.

4. Reported Emissions of SF6 in Great Britain between 2010 and 2016 by Transmission Network Area

There are three transmission network operators in Scotland, England, and Wales. The network areas covered by each transmission network operator are shown in Figure 3a.
In Table 7, the emissions of SF6 reported by transmission network operators are summarised for the three transmission network areas. It can be shown in Figure 3b that, over the last four years, the total emissions of SF6 has been slowly decreasing, which is likely to be helped by the replacement of the oldest equipment which has the worst leakage rates. New replacement equipment is likely to have improved gas seals that reduce the amount of SF6 being released into the atmosphere and, therefore, the amount of maintenance top-ups. In some instances, transmission network operators have reported that these figures are distorted by single containment failures which have led to increased amounts of SF6 being released into the atmosphere. One such event, which occurred in the year 2013–2014, where a rupture disc failure on a newly commissioned circuit breaker led to the release of 113 kg of SF6 in a single event, this contributed to approximately one-third of the SF6 released in that year in that area [50].
In Table 7, it can be seen that the amount of SF6 released into the atmosphere from the transmission network in England, Scotland and Wales was 10,215 kg of SF6 for the reported year 2015–2016. The calculated equivalent emissions of CO2 compared to SF6 emissions with a scale factor of 22,800 gives an equivalent 232,902 tonnes of CO2 being released into the atmosphere, as shown in Table 8.
The estimated inventory of SF6 used on the transmission network for England, Scotland, and Wales is shown in Table 9. For the year 2015–2016, the total amount of SF6 used on the network is estimated using the previous year’s figures for map area 1, as no data was available for this year. It can be observed from Figure 3b that the amount of SF6 used on the transmission network has increased for the last three years. The data in Table 9 indicates that the amount of SF6 used on the England and Wales transmission network has increased steadily for the last five years, meaning that more equipment insulated with SF6 must have been installed each year along with innovations in leakage mitigation.
In Table 10, the estimated SF6 annual leak rate of all equipment on the transmission networks in England, Scotland, and Wales is reported. The leakage rate of each area is calculated using the amount of SF6 leaked in a particular year as a percentage of the total inventory of SF6 used on the transmission network. It is important to note from Table 10 that the annual average leakage rate for SF6 equipment on the transmission network fluctuates from year to year, and this is likely to be caused by accidental leakage from single incidents or the amount of maintenance or new installations undertaken.

5. Conclusions

This paper evaluates the present inventory of SF6 that is needed to sustain the electrical distribution and transmission networks in England, Scotland, and Wales. It has also shown the present emissions of SF6 from these networks into the atmosphere, the equivalent CO2 emissions from this potent global warming gas and the leakage percentage rate at which SF6 is released from the total inventory.
This paper highlights that, over the last six years, the amount of SF6 inventory currently held by distribution network operators has increased by an average of 9401 kg per year. In the year 2015–2016, the total inventory of SF6 on the distribution network was 273,496 kg of SF6 with a leakage rate of 0.40%. This work has also shown that over the last three years, the average annual increase of SF6 used on the transmission network has increased by 32,071 kg each year. At current levels, the amount of SF6 used on the transmission network currently stands at 846,384 kg as of 2015–2016. Over the last three years, the average SF6 leak rate can be calculated as 1.29% per year.
In the year 2015–2016, the total amount of SF6 used on the electrical network is approximately 1,119,880 kg in England, Scotland and Wales. The amount of SF6 released into the atmosphere for the year 2015–2016 was approximately 11,320 kg which is the equivalent of 258,110 tonnes of CO2 being released into the environment. The environmental impact of this release of SF6 into the atmosphere from all power utilities around the world, could have serious implications for the future, considering the long atmospheric lifetime that SF6 has and its ability to contribute towards global warming if nothing is done to reduce its use. This work, therefore, highlights the need to research a new environmentally friendly alternative insulation gas to replace the highly global warming gas SF6.
At present, research is investigating the use of alternative gases such as CF3I gas mixtures in simple geometries [66,67], as well as other environmentally-friendly alternatives, such as fluoronitriles, fluoroketones, and HFOs [68], all of which have demonstrated promising results as alternatives. These gases all exhibit a lower global warming potential than SF6, such as CF3I, which has a GWP of less than 5 [68,69], compared to the most recent estimation of 23,500 for SF6 [4]. The environmental impact of these gases in the atmosphere is also decreased with gases, like CF3I, exhibiting an atmospheric lifetime of less than two days [69] compared to 3200 years for SF6 [1], however, there are still concerns regarding their toxicity and much research is still needed to evaluate their characteristics in full. Some of these gases are now being trialled as an alternative insulation medium in switchgear [70,71,72] to replace SF6. However, at present, the full characteristics of these new insulation gases and their practical feasibility for the long-term are still being investigated, including a 400 kV gas-insulated line (GIL) demonstrator at Cardiff University to trial new alternative environmentally-friendly gases. Industry-led projects are also readily being explored to trial alternative insulation gases to counteract this problem and demonstration sites are being setup by all distribution and transmission network operators in order to find a solution to replace SF6. Industry-led projects are expected to produce better equipment with improved leakage mitigation to help curb the problem with all network and distribution network operators committed to reducing SF6 losses [10,12,16,42,45,57,63]. For example, a demonstration site at Sellindge substation in Kent, UK has been commissioned to install a 400 kV substation that is insulated by a new green gas for grid (g3) as an alternative to SF6 [73].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: P.W. and A.H.; methodology: P.W.; validation, A.H.; formal analysis: P.W.; investigation: P.W.; data curation: P.W.; writing—original draft preparation: P.W.; writing—review and editing: P.W. and A.H.; visualization: P.W.; supervision: A.H.

Funding

This research was funded by the EPSRC funded IET Power Networks Research Academy (PNRA), grant number EP/F037686/1 and the EU/Welsh Government funded project FLEXIS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Working Group I Contribution to Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission, European Environment Agency. Company Reporting (EU) No 517/2014 on Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases–Frequently Asked Questions, F-Gases FAQ: Version 2.3. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/f-gas/docs/faq_reporting_en.pdf (accessed on 6 February 2017).
  3. UK Government, Department for Environment. Food & Rural Affairs and Environment Agency (DEFRA), Guidance: Calculate the Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Quantity of an F Gas. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/calculate-the-carbon-dioxide-equivalent-quantity-of-an-f-gas (accessed on 31 December 2014).
  4. Myhre, G.; Shindell, D.; Bréon, F.M.; Collins, W.; Fuglestvedt, J.; Jianping, H.; Koch, D.; Lamarque, J.F.; David, L.; Mendoza, B.; et al. Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. United Nations. Kyoto Protocol—United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1998. Available online: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2017).
  6. United Nations. Paris Agreement—United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2015. Available online: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2017).
  7. Farish, O.; Judd, M.D.; Hampton, B.F.; Pearson, J.S. SF6 insulation systems and their monitoring. In Advances in High Voltage Engineering; IEE Power & Energy Series 40; Haddad, A., Warne, D., Eds.; The Institute of Electric Engineers: London, UK, 2004; Volume 40, pp. 37–76. ISBN 978-1-84919-038-1. [Google Scholar]
  8. Duquerroy, P.; Sonzogni, G.; Perrissin, G.; Bouillon, B.J. MV Switchgear breaking in SF6: The Situation after 20 Years in Service. In Trends in Distribution Switchgear, 1994 Fourth International Conference on Trends in Distribution Switchgear; IEE Conference Publication: London, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  9. UK Power Networks. Business Plan (2015 to 2023) Executive Summary. March 2014. Available online: http://library.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/library/en/RIIO/Main_Business_Plan_Documents_and_Annexes/UKPN_Overall_Executive_Summary.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2017).
  10. Western Power Distribution. RIIO-ED1 Business Plan, Business Plan Commitments Report 2015/16. 31 October 2016. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/About-us/Stakeholder-information/Performance-reporting-RIIO-ED1/WPD-RIIO-ED1-Business-Plan-Commitments-Report-2015.aspx (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  11. National Grid. National Grid Electricity Transmission’s RIIO-T1 Business Plan Overview, Connecting a Sustainable Future. March 2012. Available online: http://www.talkingnetworkstx.com/electricityplan/assets/downloads/BusinessPlanOverview_ELEC.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2017).
  12. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks. Supporting Document 06. Reporting on Our Environmental Impact. 19 July 2011. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=1469 (accessed on 17 January 2017).
  13. SP Energy Networks. ED1 Environment & Innovation Report 2015/16. 2016. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/ED1%20Environment%20and%20Innovation%20Report.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  14. Electricity North West. Business Carbon Footprint Report 2012–2013. 2013. Available online: http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/default-source/sustainability/business-carbon-footprint-report-2012-13.pdf?sfvrsn=0 (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  15. UK Power Networks. Business Carbon Footprint 2015/16. 2016. Available online: http://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/en/about-us/documents/BCF%20commentary%20for%20internet%2015-16.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  16. UK Power Networks. Environment Report 2015–16. 2016. Available online: http://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/en/about-us/documents/UKPN-Environment-Report-2015-16-v1.0-PXM-2016-10-31.pdf (accessed on 13 July 2017).
  17. Western Power Distribution. West Midlands Environment and Innovation Reporting Pack, Reporting Year 2016, E2—Environmental Reporting. 2016. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/Environment/Facts-and-figures/2015-16_WMID_RRP_ENVIRONMENTINNOVATION.aspx (accessed on 15 July 2017).
  18. Western Power Distribution (West Midlands) Plc. Business Carbon Footprint 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 Commentary and Methodology. July 2012. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/west-midlands-bcf-report-2011-12.aspx (accessed on 15 July 2017).
  19. Western Power Distribution. East Midlands Environment and Innovation Reporting Pack, Reporting Year 2016, E2—Environmental Reporting. 2016. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/Environment/Facts-and-figures/2015-16_EMID_RRP_ENVIRONMENTINNOVATION.aspx (accessed on 15 July 2017).
  20. Western Power Distribution (East Midlands) Plc. Business Carbon Footprint 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 Commentary and Methodology. July 2012. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/East-Midlands-BCF-Report-2011-12V-2.aspx (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  21. Western Power Distribution. South West Environment and Innovation Reporting Pack, Reporting Year 2016, E2—Environmental Reporting. 2016. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/Environment/Facts-and-figures/2015-16_SWEST_RRP_ENVIRONMENTINNOVATION.aspx (accessed on 15 July 2017).
  22. Western Power Distribution (South West) Plc. Regulatory Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2015. 2015. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/About-us/financial-information/2015/WPD-S-West-Regulatory-Fin-Statements-Mar15.aspx (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  23. Western Power Distribution (South West) Plc. Business Carbon Footprint 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 Commentary and Methodology. July 2012. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/WPD-South-West-BCF-Report-2011-12-(1).aspx (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  24. Western Power Distribution. South Wales Environment and Innovation Reporting Pack, Reporting Year 2016, E2—Environmental Reporting. 2016. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/Environment/Facts-and-figures/2015-16_SWALES_RRP_ENVIRONMENTINNOVATION.aspx (accessed on 15 July 2017).
  25. Western Power Distribution (South Wales) Plc. Business Carbon Footprint 01/04/2011 to 31/03/2012 Commentary and Methodology. July 2012. Available online: https://www.westernpower.co.uk/docs/social-responsibility/WPD-South-Wales-BCF-Report-2011-12-(1).aspx (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  26. UK Power Networks. RIIO-ED1 RIGs Environment and Innovation Commentary, Version 2.0, 2015–16. 2016. Available online: http://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/en/about-us/documents/UKPN-2015-16-Environment-and-Innovation-Commentary.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2017).
  27. UK Power Networks. Business Plan (2015 to 2023) Annex 1: Historic Outputs. March 2014. Available online: https://library.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/library/en/RIIO/Main_Business_Plan_Documents_and_Annexes/UKPN_Historic_Outputs.pdf (accessed on 3 August 2017).
  28. UK Power Networks. Business Carbon Footprint (BCF) Report. 2013. Available online: http://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/asset/ae0bf7bc-4cfa-45ec-a1aa-ac2357e9b19A/UKPN09308+Carbon+Report10.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  29. UK Power Networks. Business Carbon Footprint (BCF) Report, Commentary & Methodology, Clive Steed, Head of Environment, Sustainability & Public Safety. 2012. Available online: http://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/en/about-us/documents/UKPN-BCF-2013-for-External-Publishing-Final-for-sign-off(Jul13) (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  30. UK Power Networks. Business Carbon Footprint (BCF) Report Commentary & Methodology, Clive Steed, Head of Environment, Sustainability & Public Safety. 2011. Available online: https://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/en/about-us/documents/bcf-commentary-2011-final-1.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  31. UK Power Networks. Business Carbon Footprint (BCF) Report Commentary and Methodology, Clive Steed, Head of Sustainability. 2010. Available online: http://www.ukpowernetworks.co.uk/internet/en/about-us/documents/bcf-commentary-2011-final.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2017).
  32. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks. Environment Report 2015/16 2016. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=12779 (accessed on 2 February 2017).
  33. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks. Distribution Business Plan Commitment Report 2015/16. 2016. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=12083 (accessed on 2 February 2017).
  34. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution. Environmental Impact Annual Report 2014/15. 2015. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=5633 (accessed on 2 February 2017).
  35. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution. Environmental Impact Annual Report 2013/14. 2014. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2945 (accessed on 2 February 2017).
  36. SP Energy Networks. Business Carbon Footprint, Annual Report for 2014/15, SP Distribution and SP Manweb. 2015. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/Business%20Carbon%20Footprint%20Report%202014-15.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  37. SP Energy Networks. Business Carbon Footprint, Annual Report for 2013, SP Distribution and SP Manweb. 2013. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/Business%20Carbon%20Footprint%20Report%202013.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  38. SP Energy Networks. Business Carbon Footprint Statement for 2012, SP Distribution and SP Manweb. 2012. Available online: https://www.scottishpower.com/userfiles/document_library/BusinessCarbonFootprintStatement2012.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  39. SP Energy Networks. Business Carbon Footprint Statement for 2011, SP Distribution, SP Manweb, SP Transmission. 2011. Available online: https://www.scottishpower.com/userfiles/document_library/BusinessCarbonFootprintStatement2011.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  40. Northern Powergrid. Regulatory Instructions and Guidance (RIGs) for RIIO-ED1, Ofgem, March 2016, Section 2—Environmental Report 2015/16—Detailed Tables Annex. October 2016. Available online: http://www.northernpowergrid.com/asset/0/document/2692.xlsx (accessed on 13 July 2017).
  41. Northern Powergrid. 2013 Business Carbon Footprint Reporting for Northern Powergrid (Northeast) and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) Commentary and Methodology. 2013. Available online: http://www.northernpowergrid.com/asset/0/document/195.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  42. Northern Powergrid. Environment Report 2015/16. 2016. Available online: http://www.northernpowergrid.com/asset/0/document/2724.pdf (accessed on 16 January 2017).
  43. Northern Powergrid. 2015–16 Business Carbon Footprint. 2016. Available online: http://www.northernpowergrid.com/asset/1/document/2551.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2017).
  44. Electricity North West. (ENWL) RIIO_ED1 Environment Report—Environment and Innovation Reporting Pack, Version 1.0, E2—Environmental Reporting, 2016. 2016. Available online: http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/default-source/about-us/riio-ed1-environment-report---environment_and_innovation_reporting_pack_1-0_final.xlsx?sfvrsn=0 (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  45. Electricity North West. (ENWL) Environment Report 2015–16. 2016. Available online: http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/default-source/about-us/environment-report-2015-16.pdf?sfvrsn=0 (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  46. Electricity North West. Carbon Footprint Report 2014–2015. 2015. Available online: http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/default-source/about-us/business-carbon-footprint-report-2014-15.pdf?sfvrsn=0 (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  47. Electricity North West. Carbon Footprint Report 2013–2014. 2014. Available online: http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/default-source/about-us/business-carbon-footprint-report-2013-14.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  48. Electricity North West. Carbon Footprint Report, 2011–2012. 2012. Available online: http://www.enwl.co.uk/docs/about-us/carbon-footprint-report.pdf (accessed on 13 January 2017).
  49. International Electrotechnical Commission. BSI British Standards High-Voltage Switchgear and Controlgear—Part 1: Common Specifications for Alternating Current Switchgear and Controlgear; British Standard BS62271-1 (Identical to IEC62271-1); International Electrotechnical Commission: London, UK, 2008; Chapter 5.15.3, p. 5; Chapter 6.2.4, p. 61. [Google Scholar]
  50. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution, Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission Plc. Annual Performance Report 2013/14. September 2014. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=3386 (accessed on 18 January 2017).
  51. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution, Scottish Hydro Electric (SHE) Transmission. Published Totex 2015/16, SHE Transmission Annual Performance Report 2015–16 Appendix 1 Data Tables. 2016. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/TransmissionPriceControlReview/ (accessed on 17 January 2017).
  52. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution, Scottish Hydro Electric (SHE) Transmission. Published Totex 2014/15, SHE Transmission Annual Performance Report 2014–15 Appendix 1 Data Tables. 2015. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/TransmissionPriceControlReview/ (accessed on 17 January 2017).
  53. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution, Scottish Hydro Electric (SHE) Transmission. Published Totex 2013/14, SHE Transmission Annual Performance Report 2013–14 Appendix 1 Data Tables. 2014. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/TransmissionPriceControlReview/ (accessed on 17 January 2017).
  54. Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks. SHE Transmission Annual Performance Report 2015/16. 2016. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/TransmissionPriceControlReview/ (accessed on 18 January 2017).
  55. Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution. SHE Transmission, Annual Performance Report 2014/15. September 2015. Available online: https://www.ssepd.co.uk/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=6477 (accessed on 18 January 2017).
  56. SP Transmission. Totex Scottish Power Transmission 2015/16, Consolidated Outputs—Energy Not Supplied (ENS), SF6 Leakage, Customer and Stakeholder Satisfaction, and Timely Connections. 2016. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/Consolidated_Outputs_Energy_Not_Supplied.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
  57. SP Transmission. Annual Performance Report 2015/16. 2016. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/SPEN_TransmissionReport.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
  58. SP Transmission. RIIO T1 Business Plan Update, January 2012, Executive Summary. 2012. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/Executive_Summary.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
  59. SP Energy Networks. Sustainability Strategy Annual Statement, SP Transmission plc. March 2014. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/SP_EDRS_Annual_Statement_Proof_6.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
  60. SP Transmission. Totex Scottish Power Transmission 2014/15, Consolidated Outputs—Energy Not Supplied (ENS), SF6 Leakage, Customer and stakeholder Satisfaction, and Timely Connections. 2015. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/Consolidated%20Outputs%20-%20Energy%20Not%20Supplied%20(ENS)SF6%20leakage%20customer%20and%20stakeholder%20satisfaction%20and%20timely%20connections.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
  61. SP Transmission. RIIO T1 Environment Submission. December 2011. Available online: https://www.spenergynetworks.co.uk/userfiles/file/Environment.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2017).
  62. National Grid. Totex—National Grid Electricity Transmission 2015/16. 2016. Available online: http://consense.opendebate.co.uk/files/nationalgrid/nationalgrid/transmission/NGET_Data_Tables.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2017).
  63. National Grid. Electricity Transmission, Our Performance Stakeholder Report: Electricity, 2015/16. 2016. Available online: http://www2.nationalgrid.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8589936779 (accessed on 12 January 2017).
  64. National Grid. Totex—National Grid Electricity Transmission 2014/15, NGET RRP Cost and Outputs Published Data Tables v2.1. 2015. Available online: http://consense.opendebate.co.uk/files/nationalgrid/nationalgrid/transmission/2014-15_NGET_RRP_Cost_and_Outputs_Published_Data_Tables_v2.1.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2017).
  65. National Grid. Social Responsibility, Investor Relations. March 2013. Available online: www2.nationalgrid.com/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=8544 (accessed on 12 January 2017).
  66. Kamarudin, M.S.; Chen, L.; Widger, P.; Elnaddab, K.H.; Albano, M.; Griffiths, H.; Haddad, A. CF3I Gas and Its Mixtures: Potential for Electrical Insulation. In Proceedings of the CIGRE Session 45, Paris, France, 24–29 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kamarudin, M.S.; Haddad, A.; MacGregor, S.J. Experimental investigation of CF3I-CO2 gas mixtures under lightning impulses. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Gas Discharges and Their Applications, Orléans, France, 6–11 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  68. Beroual, A.; Haddad, A. Recent Advances in the Quest for a New Insulation Gas with a Low Impact on the Environment to Replace Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas in High-Voltage Power Network Applications. Energies 2017, 10, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Taki, M.; Maekawa, D.; Odaka, H.; Mizoguchi, H.; Yanabu, S. Interruption Capability of CF3I Gas as a substitution Candidate for SF6 Gas. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2007, 14, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Widger, P.; Haddad, A.; Griffiths, H. Breakdown performance of vacuum circuit breakers using alternative CF3I-CO2 insulation gas mixture. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, L.; Widger, P.; Kamarudin, M.S.; Griffiths, H.; Haddad, A. CF3I Gas Mixtures: Breakdown Characteristics and Potential for Electrical Insulation. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2017, 32, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Widger, P.; Griffiths, H.; Haddad, A. Insulation strength of CF3I-CO2 gas mixtures as an alternative to SF6 in MV switch disconnectors. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. National Grid. National Grid Commissions Green Alternative to Sulphur Hexafluoride. 31 May 2017. Available online: http://media.nationalgrid.com/press-releases/uk-press-releases/south/world-first-at-sellindge-substation/ (accessed on 1 October 2017).
Figure 1. (a) Distribution network areas in Great Britain; and (b) the total SF6 inventory (kg) and emissions level (kg) of the electricity distribution network in Great Britain [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
Figure 1. (a) Distribution network areas in Great Britain; and (b) the total SF6 inventory (kg) and emissions level (kg) of the electricity distribution network in Great Britain [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
Energies 11 02037 g001
Figure 2. (a) Calculated annual average SF6 emissions (kg) of the distribution network in Great Britain (between 2010 and 2016); and (b) SF6 inventory (kg) of the distribution network in Great Britain (2015–2016).
Figure 2. (a) Calculated annual average SF6 emissions (kg) of the distribution network in Great Britain (between 2010 and 2016); and (b) SF6 inventory (kg) of the distribution network in Great Britain (2015–2016).
Energies 11 02037 g002
Figure 3. (a) Transmission network areas in Great Britain; and (b) total SF6 inventory (kg) and emissions level (kg) of the electricity transmission network in Great Britain.
Figure 3. (a) Transmission network areas in Great Britain; and (b) total SF6 inventory (kg) and emissions level (kg) of the electricity transmission network in Great Britain.
Energies 11 02037 g003
Table 1. SF6 emissions (kg) by electricity distribution network area in Great Britain.
Table 1. SF6 emissions (kg) by electricity distribution network area in Great Britain.
Map No.Distribution Network AreaYearly SF6 Emissions (kg)Data Source
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
7West Midlands14.00130.0054.0095.0062.00164.00[17,18]
8East Midlands11.0090.0042.0044.0014.0045.00[19,20]
1South West England211.00197.00141.00158.00129.00100.00[21,22,23]
6South Wales85.0085.0017.0042.00141.0088.00[24,25]
3London43.0119.0026.5710.4221.609.55[15,16,26,27,28,29,30,31]
4South Eastern17.9920.0013.1816.5715.8717.61[15,16,26,27,28,29,30,31]
5Eastern81.0071.0071.0071.8467.5866.89[15,16,26,27,28,29,30,31]
14North Scotland41.6443.4446.0057.7766.6279.00[32,33,34,35]
2Southern249.52267.40323.02311.06303.53382.00[32,33,34,35]
13South Scotland55.0968.5761.0061.7062.400.80[13,36,37,38,39]
9North Wales108.46119.04121.00121.80124.2029.87[13,36,37,38,39]
12Northeast47.0033.0036.0025.0016.0024.00[40,41,42,43]
11Yorkshire47.0097.0036.0098.0079.0084.00[40,41,42,43]
10North West137.5051.5049.8057.1036.1014.63[44,45,46,47,48]
Total1149.211291.951037.571170.261138.901105.35
Table 2. Calculated equivalent electricity distribution network area SF6 emissions (tCO2e) (scale factor: 1 kg SF6 = 22,800 kg CO2).
Table 2. Calculated equivalent electricity distribution network area SF6 emissions (tCO2e) (scale factor: 1 kg SF6 = 22,800 kg CO2).
Map No.Distribution Network AreaYearly Calculated Equivalent CO2 Emissions/Leakage (Tonnes—tCO2e)
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
7West Midlands319.202964.001231.202166.001413.603739.20
8East Midlands250.802052.00957.601003.20319.201026.00
1South West England4810.804491.603214.803602.402941.202280.00
6South Wales1938.001938.00387.60957.603214.802006.40
3London980.63433.20605.80237.58492.48217.74
4South Eastern410.17456.00300.50377.80361.84401.51
5Eastern1846.801618.801618.801637.951540.821525.09
14North Scotland949.39990.431048.801317.161518.941801.20
2Southern5689.066096.727364.867092.176920.488709.60
13South Scotland1256.051563.401390.801406.761422.7218.24
9North Wales2472.892714.112758.802777.042831.76681.04
12Northeast1071.60752.40820.80570.00364.80547.20
11Yorkshire1071.602211.60820.802234.401801.201915.20
10North West3135.001174.201135.441301.88823.08333.56
Total26,201.9929,456.4623,656.626,681.9325,966.9225,201.98
Table 3. SF6 Inventory held in each electricity distribution network area (kg) in Great Britain.
Table 3. SF6 Inventory held in each electricity distribution network area (kg) in Great Britain.
Map No.Distribution Network AreaYearly SF6 Inventory (kg)Data Source
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
7West Midlands13,18413,81514,65817,53719,46420,866[17,18]
8East Midlands11,69012,09013,48915,68416,95218,231[19,20]
1South West England11,99212,52911,79611,32711,55811,684[21,22,23]
6South Wales13,81814,15415,33315,59716,22716,632[24,25]
3London42,05941,56741,038--41,825[15,16,26,27,28,29,30,31]
4South Eastern16,71017,27618,670--19,318[15,16,26,27,28,29,30,31]
5Eastern26,89030,48230,926--35,825[15,16,26,27,28,29,30,31]
14North Scotland386440944430488752325511[32,33,34,35]
2Southern17,73118,27920,27822,98421,96825,702[32,33,34,35]
13South Scotland11,01711,39711,85612,56413,25912,710[13,36,37,38,39]
9North Wales21,69121,94921,69122,19323,11716,893[13,36,37,38,39]
12Northeast9089996013,83214,53015,12515,259[40,41,42,43]
11Yorkshire908912,82516,40117,28117,81718,304[40,41,42,43]
10North West17,66714,41012,94913,50916,85214,736[44,45,46,47,48]
Total226,491234,827247,347258,727268,205273,496
Table 4. Calculated SF6 annual leak rate of the electricity distribution network (%) in Great Britain.
Table 4. Calculated SF6 annual leak rate of the electricity distribution network (%) in Great Britain.
Map No.Distribution Network AreaSF6 Annual Leak Rate (Percent %)
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
7West Midlands0.110.940.370.540.320.79
8East Midlands0.090.740.310.280.080.25
1South West England1.761.571.201.391.120.86
6South Wales0.620.600.110.270.870.53
3London0.100.050.06--0.02
4South Eastern0.110.120.07--0.09
5Eastern0.300.230.23--0.19
14North Scotland1.081.061.041.181.271.43
2Southern1.411.461.591.351.381.49
13South Scotland0.500.600.510.490.470.01
9North Wales0.500.540.560.550.540.18
12Northeast0.520.330.260.170.110.16
11Yorkshire0.520.760.220.570.440.46
10North West0.780.360.380.420.210.10
Total Yearly Average0.510.550.420.450.420.40
Table 5. Calculated annual average SF6 emissions (kg) (2010–2016) of the distribution network in Great Britain.
Table 5. Calculated annual average SF6 emissions (kg) (2010–2016) of the distribution network in Great Britain.
Map No.Distribution Network AreaAnnual Average SF6 Emissions (kg) (2010–2016)
2Southern306.09
1South West England156.00
9North Wales104.06
7West Midlands86.50
6South Wales76.33
11Yorkshire73.50
5Eastern71.55
10North West57.77
14North Scotland55.75
13South Scotland51.59
8East Midlands41.00
12Northeast30.17
3London21.69
4South Eastern16.87
Total Average1149
Table 6. SF6 inventory of the distribution network (kg) in Great Britain (2015–2016) [13,16,17,19,21,24,32,40,44].
Table 6. SF6 inventory of the distribution network (kg) in Great Britain (2015–2016) [13,16,17,19,21,24,32,40,44].
Map No.Distribution Network AreaSF6 Inventory (kg) 2015–2016
3London41,825
5Eastern35,825
2Southern25,702
7West Midlands20,866
4South Eastern19,318
11Yorkshire18,304
8East Midlands18,231
9North Wales16,893
6South Wales16,632
12Northeast15,259
10North West14,736
13South Scotland12,710
1South West England11,684
14North Scotland5511
Total Inventory273,496
Table 7. SF6 emissions (kg) by transmission network area in Great Britain.
Table 7. SF6 emissions (kg) by transmission network area in Great Britain.
Map No.Transmission Network AreaYearly SF6 Emissions (kg)References
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
1Scottish Hydro-Electric Transmission (SHE)--158.00335.27339.20272.26[50,51,52,53,54,55,56]
2SP Transmission727.65-520.00729.50494.61441.00[56,57,58,59,60,61]
3National Grid Electricity Transmission-12,200.0011,900.0010,110.009544.009502.00[62,63,64,65]
Total--12,578.0011,174.7710,377.8110,215.26
Table 8. Calculated equivalent transmission network area SF6 emissions (tCO2e) (scale factor: 1 kg SF6 = 22,800 kg CO2).
Table 8. Calculated equivalent transmission network area SF6 emissions (tCO2e) (scale factor: 1 kg SF6 = 22,800 kg CO2).
Map No.Transmission Network AreaCalculated Yearly Equivalent CO2 Emissions/Leakage (Tonnes—tCO2e))
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
1Scottish Hydro-Electric Transmission (SHE)--3602.407644.167733.766207.53
2SP Transmission16590.42-11,856.0016,632.6011,277.1110,054.80
3National Grid Electricity Transmission-278,160.00271,320.00230,508.00217,603.20216,645.60
Total--286,778.40254,784.76236,614.07232,907.93
Table 9. Estimated SF6 Inventory on each transmission network area (kg) in Great Britain.
Table 9. Estimated SF6 Inventory on each transmission network area (kg) in Great Britain.
Map No.Transmission Network AreaYearly SF6 Emissions (kg)References
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
1Scottish Hydro-Electric Transmission (SHE)---72069050-[50,51,52,53,54,55,56]
2SP Transmission--53,80656,29258,16064,814[56,57,58,59,60,61]
3National Grid Electricity Transmission-610,000661,111718,745771,189772,520[62,63,64,65]
Total 782,243838,399846,384
Table 10. Estimated SF6 Annual leak rate on the transmission network (percent, %) in Great Britain.
Table 10. Estimated SF6 Annual leak rate on the transmission network (percent, %) in Great Britain.
Map No.Transmission Network AreaSF6 Annual Leak Rate (Percent, %)
2010–20112011–20122012–20132013–20142014–20152015–2016
1Scottish Hydro-Electric Transmission (SHE)---4.653.75-
2SP Transmission--0.971.300.850.68
3National Grid Electricity Transmission-2.001.801.411.241.23
Total Average-2.001.42.51.90.96

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Widger, P.; Haddad, A. Evaluation of SF6 Leakage from Gas Insulated Equipment on Electricity Networks in Great Britain. Energies 2018, 11, 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082037

AMA Style

Widger P, Haddad A. Evaluation of SF6 Leakage from Gas Insulated Equipment on Electricity Networks in Great Britain. Energies. 2018; 11(8):2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Widger, Phillip, and Abderrahmane (Manu) Haddad. 2018. "Evaluation of SF6 Leakage from Gas Insulated Equipment on Electricity Networks in Great Britain" Energies 11, no. 8: 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop