Next Article in Journal
An Efficient Phase-Locked Loop for Distorted Three-Phase Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Relative Voltage Control of the Wind Farms Based on the Local Reactive Power Regulation
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2017, 10(3), 282; doi:10.3390/en10030282

Performance Analyses of Counter-Flow Closed Wet Cooling Towers Based on a Simplified Calculation Method

College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Leonardo P. Chamorro
Received: 14 January 2017 / Accepted: 23 February 2017 / Published: 27 February 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [4351 KB, uploaded 28 February 2017]   |  


As one of the most widely used units in water cooling systems, the closed wet cooling towers (CWCTs) have two typical counter-flow constructions, in which the spray water flows from the top to the bottom, and the moist air and cooling water flow in the opposite direction vertically (parallel) or horizontally (cross), respectively. This study aims to present a simplified calculation method for conveniently and accurately analyzing the thermal performance of the two types of counter-flow CWCTs, viz. the parallel counter-flow CWCT (PCFCWCT) and the cross counter-flow CWCT (CCFCWCT). A simplified cooling capacity model that just includes two characteristic parameters is developed. The Levenberg–Marquardt method is employed to determine the model parameters by curve fitting of experimental data. Based on the proposed model, the predicted outlet temperatures of the process water are compared with the measurements of a PCFCWCT and a CCFCWCT, respectively, reported in the literature. The results indicate that the predicted values agree well with the experimental data in previous studies. The maximum absolute errors in predicting the process water outlet temperatures are 0.20 and 0.24 °C for the PCFCWCT and CCFCWCT, respectively. These results indicate that the simplified method is reliable for performance prediction of counter-flow CWCTs. Although the flow patterns of the two towers are different, the variation trends of thermal performance are similar to each other under various operating conditions. The inlet air wet-bulb temperature, inlet cooling water temperature, air flow rate, and cooling water flow rate are crucial for determining the cooling capacity of a counter-flow CWCT, while the cooling tower effectiveness is mainly determined by the flow rates of air and cooling water. Compared with the CCFCWCT, the PCFCWCT is much more applicable in a large-scale cooling water system, and the superiority would be amplified when the scale of water distribution system increases. Without multiple iterative calculations and extensive experimental data, the simplified method could be used to effectively analyze the thermal performance of counter-flow CWCTs in operation. It is useful for optimization operation of counter-flow CWCTs such that to improve the energy efficiency of the overall cooling water system. View Full-Text
Keywords: closed wet cooling tower; counter-flow; Levenberg–Marquardt method; cooling capacity; cooling tower effectiveness closed wet cooling tower; counter-flow; Levenberg–Marquardt method; cooling capacity; cooling tower effectiveness

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, X.; Li, N.; Peng, J.; Cheng, J.; Hu, J.; Wang, M. Performance Analyses of Counter-Flow Closed Wet Cooling Towers Based on a Simplified Calculation Method. Energies 2017, 10, 282.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top