Polyketides from the Mangrove-Derived Endophytic Fungus Nectria sp. HN001 and Their α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity

Abstract

Four new polyketides: nectriacids A–C (1–3) and 12-epicitreoisocoumarinol (4), together with three known compounds: citreoisocoumarinol (5), citreoisocoumarin (6), and macrocarpon C (7) were isolated from the culture of the endophytic fungus Nectria sp. HN001, which was isolated from a fresh branch of the mangrove plant Sonneratia ovata collected from the South China Sea. Their structures were determined by the detailed analysis of NMR and mass spectroscopic data. The absolute configuration of the stereogenic carbons for compound 4 was further assigned by Mosher’s ester method. All of the isolated compounds were tested for their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity by UV absorbance at 405 nm, and new compounds 2 and 3 exhibited potent inhibitory activity with IC₅₀ values of 23.5 and 42.3 μM, respectively, which were more potent than positive control (acarbose, IC₅₀, 815.3 μM).

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus, one of the most common chronic metabolic diseases, occurs when the pancreas produces insufficient levels of insulin or when the body cannot use the insulin effectively [1]. In 2015, about 415 million people had diabetes worldwide, with type II diabetes accounting for about 90% of the cases [2,3]. α-Glucosidase is an important enzyme for breaking down complex carbohydrates for absorption, and α-glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose, miglitol, and voglibose, all originating from natural products, are widely used to treat type II diabetes, indicating that natural products are an important source of anti-diabetes drugs.

Endophytic fungi can produce a diversity of natural products, which are structurally unique and possess interesting biological and pharmacological properties [4,5]. As part of our ongoing investigation into bioactive metabolites from mangrove endophytic fungi collected from the South China Sea [6,7,8,9,10,11,12], a chemical investigation of the mangrove-derived fungus Nectria sp. HN001, isolated from a fresh branch of the mangrove plant Sonneratia ovata, had led to the isolation and characterization of four new polyketides: nectriacid A (1), nectriacid B (2), nectriacid C (3), and 12-epicitreoisocoumarinol (4), as well as three known compounds: citreoisocoumarinol (5), citreoisocoumarin (6), and macrocarpon C (7) (Figure 1). Previous studies showed that linear polyene derivatives exhibited anti-inflammatory [13], antihypertensive [14], antibacterial [15], and antifungal activities [16]. In this report, compounds (1–7) from the Nectria sp. HN001 were evaluated for α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. The results showed that compounds 2 and 3 exhibited significant inhibitory activity toward α-glucosidase. Here, details of the isolation, structure elucidation, and activity against α-glucosidase of these compounds are described.

2. Results

Nectriacid A (1) was obtained as yellow amorphous powder. Its molecular formula C₁₅H₁₈O₄ was established by the (−)-HRESIMS at m/z 261.1130 [M − H]⁻ (calcd for 261.1132), implying seven degrees of unsaturation. Its IR spectrum exhibited absorption bands for hydroxyl (3363 cm⁻¹) and conjugated carbonyl (1684 cm⁻¹) groups. The ¹H NMR data of 1 (

Table 1. ¹H (500 MHz) and ¹³C (125 MHz) NMR data for compounds 1 (DMSO-d₆), 2 (CDCl₃), and 3 (CDCl₃).

Position	1		2		3
	δH (J in Hz)	δC	δH (J in Hz)	δC	δH (J in Hz)	δC
1		167.7, C		171.6, C		170.9, C
2	5.76, s	120.2, CH	5.78, s	118.8, CH	5.76, s	118.9, CH
3		151.6, C		155.8, C		155.7, C
4	6.20, s	136.1, CH	6.08, s	136.3, CH	5.97, s	134.3, CH
5		138.5, C		134.6, C		137.7, C
6	6.60, d (15.1)	141.8, CH	6.44, d (15.2)	141.8, CH	6.91, d (15.1)	134.6, CH
7	6.76, dd (15.1, 11.2)	126.2, CH	6.70, dd (15.2, 11.2)	126.6, CH	6.73, dd (15.1,11.4)	127.8, CH
8	6.57, d (11.2)	138.4, CH	6.43, d (11.2)	138.8, CH	6.49, d (11.4)	139.0, CH
9		134.4, C		135.1, C		135.1, C
10	7.27, d (15.6)	148.1, CH	7.38, d (15.6)	149.7, CH	7.38, d (15.6)	149.0, CH
11	5.86, d (15.6)	117.9, CH	5.92, d (15.6)	116.6, CH	5.92, d (15.6)	117.1, CH
12		167.4, C		168.0, C		167.9, C
13	2.24, s	18.5, CH3	2.30, s	20.3, CH3	2.26, s	20.1, CH3
14	2.02, s	14.2, CH3	2.04, s	14.8, CH3	2.00, s	21.4, CH3
15	1.93, s	12.5, CH3	1.93, s	12.8, CH3	1.93, s	12.9, CH3
-OCH3			3.74, s	51.8, CH3	3.74, s	51.7, CH3

) showed resonances for three methyl groups [δ_H 1.93 (3H, s, H-15); δ_H 2.02 (3H, s, H-14); δ_H 2.24 (3H, s, H-13)], three olefinic protons [δ_H 6.57 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, H-8), δ_H 6.20 (1H, s, H-4), and δ_H 5.76 (1H, s, H-2)], two E-configured olefinic protons [δ_H 7.27 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-10) and δ_H 5.86 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-11)], and another two E-configured olefinic protons [δ_H 6.76 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 11.2 Hz, H-7) and δ_H 6.60 (1H, d, J = 15.1 Hz, H-6)]. The ¹³C NMR (Table 1) and DEPT data showed 15 carbon resonances corresponding to three methyl (δ_C 18.5, 14.2, 12.5), seven methine sp² (δ_C 148.1, 141.8, 138.4, 136.1, 126.2, 120.2, 117.9), three quaternary sp² (δ_C 151.6, 138.5, 134.4), and two carbonyls (δ_C 167.7, 167.4) carbons. The ¹H and ¹³C NMR data of 1 were similar to those of all-E-4, 9-dimethyldodeca-2, 4, 6, 8, 10-pentaenedioic acid [17], which was isolated from the root of Mycorrhizal colonization except for the presence of an additional methyl group on C-5 (CH₃-14) in 1. The key HMBC correlations from H₃-14 to C-6 and C-4 demonstrated that CH₃-14 (δ_H 2.02, s, δ_C 14.2) was connected to C-5. Besides, comparing 1 with the known all-E-4, 9-dimethyldodeca-2, 4, 6, 8, 10-pentaenedioic acid, CH₃-13 (δ_H 2.24, s, δ_C 18.5) of 1 was linked to C-3 rather than C-4, and this was supported by the HMBC correlations (Figure 2) from H₃-13 to C-4, C-3, C-2, and C-1. Furthermore, the configurations of the double bonds (E or Z) for compound 1 were determined by the coupling constant and NOESY data. The E-geometry of the double bonds at C-6 and C-10 was assigned by the vicinal coupling constants, J = 15.6 Hz, J = 15.1 Hz, respectively. In addition, the geometry of the remaining three substituted double bonds was confirmed as 2E, 4E and 8E on the basis of the NOESY correlations (Figure 2) from H₃-13 to H-4, H₃-14 to H-2 and H-7, H-8 to H-10, as was previously reported [18]. Thus, compound 1 was determined as 2E, 4E, 6E, 8E, 10E-3, 5, 9-trimethyldodeca-2, 4, 6, 8, 10-pentaenedioic acid, and named nectriacid A.

Nectriacid B (2) was also isolated as yellow powder, and had a molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₀O₄ according to its (−)-HRESIMS m/z 275.1287 [M − H]⁻. The ¹H NMR data exhibited the signals for three methyl groups [δ_H 1.93 (3H, s, H-15); δ_H 2.04 (3H, s, H-14); δ_H 2.30 (3H, s, H-13)], one methoxy group (δ_H 3.74, s), three olefinic protons [δ_H 5.78 (1H, s, H-2); δ_H 6.08 (1H, s, H-4); δ_H 6.43 (1H, d, J = 11.2 Hz, H-8)], and two pairs of E-configured protons [δ_H 6.44 (1H, d, J = 15.2 Hz, H-6), δ_H 6.70 (1H, dd, J = 15.2, 11.2 Hz, H-7); δ_H 7.38 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-10), δ_H 5.92 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-11)]. The ¹³C NMR (Table 1) and HSQC spectra exhibited three methyl (δ_C 20.3, 14.8, 12.8), one methoxy (δ_C 51.8), seven methine sp² (δ_C 149.7, 141.8, 138.8, 136.3, 126.6, 118.8, 116.6), five quaternary sp² (δ_C 171.6, 168.0, 155.8, 135.1, 134.6) carbons. The above spectral features suggested that 2 was quite similar to 1 except for the presence of one methoxy group (δ_H 3.74, δ_C 51.8). This evidence suggested that compound 2 was derived from a methyl esterification of compound 1, which was further supported by the HMBC correlations (Figure 2) from the methoxy protons to C-12 (δ_C 168.0). The 6E and 10E configurations were confirmed by the vicinal coupling constants between H-10 and H-11 (J = 15.6 Hz), H-6 and H-7 (J = 15.2 Hz). The configurations of 2E, 4E and 8E were assigned on the basis of the NOESY correlations (Figure 2) from H₃-13 to H-4, H₃-14 to H-2 and H-7, H-8 to H-10, H₃-15 to H-11, as was previously reported [18]. Thus, the structure of 2 was established as 2E, 4E, 6E, 8E, 10E-12-methoxy-3, 5, 9-trimethyl-12-oxododeca-2, 4, 6, 8, 10-pentaenoic acid, and named nectriacid B.

Nectriacid C (3) was isolated as pale yellow powder, and its molecular formula of C₁₆H₂₀O₄ was established by the (−)-HRESIMS m/z 275.1287 [M − H]⁻. The ¹³C NMR data (Table 1) of compound 3 showed 16 carbon resonances, which were classified according to DEPTs and HSQC spectra, as three methyl (δ_C 21.4, 20.1, 12.9), five quaternary sp² (δ_C 170.9, 167.9, 155.7, 137.7, 135.1), seven methine sp² (δ_C 149.0, 139.0, 134.6, 134.3, 118.9, 117.1), and one methoxy (δ_C 51.7) carbons. Comparison of NMR data with those of 2 suggested that compound 3 possessed the same planar structure as 2. However, the double bonds geometry was different. The 6E and 10E configurations were confirmed by the vicinal coupling constants between H-6 and H-7 (J = 15.1 Hz), H-10 and H-11 (J = 15.6 Hz), respectively. The 2E, 4Z, and 8E configurations of the double bonds were established by the NOESY correlations from H₃-13 and H₃-14 to H-4, from H-2 to H-6, from H₃-15 to H-7 and H-11, from H-10 to H-8 (Figure 2) [18]. Consequently, 3 was determined as 2E, 4Z, 6E, 8E, 10E-12-methoxy-3, 5, 9-trimethyl-12-oxododeca-2, 4, 6, 8, 10-pentaenoic acid, and named nectriacid C.

Compound 4 was obtained as colorless powder. Its molecular formula C₁₄H₁₆O₆ was deduced by the (−)-HRESIMS m/z 279.0871 [M − H]⁻, corresponding to seven degrees of unsaturation. The IR spectrum displayed typical absorption bands for hydroxyl (3394 cm⁻¹) and aromatic ring system (1684, 1629, and 1588 cm⁻¹). The ¹H NMR spectrum (

Table 2. ¹H (500 MHz) and ¹³C (125 MHz) NMR data for compound 4 (MeOD-d₄) and compound 5 (MeOD-d₄).

	4		5
Position	δH (J in Hz)	δC	δH (J in Hz)	δC
1		168.0, C		168.0, C
3		156.3, C		156.1, C
4	6.37, s	107.2, CH	6.37, s	107.3, CH
4a		141.4, C		141.4, C
5	6.31, s	103.8, CH	6.31, s	103.8, CH
6		167.5, C		167.5, C
7	6.31, s	102.8, CH	6.31, s	102.8, CH
8		165.0, C		165.0, C
8a		100.0, C		100.0, C
9	2.59, dd (14.5, 8.0)	43.1, CH2	2.57, dd (14.5, 8.3)	42.5, CH2
	2.65, dd (14.5, 4.9)		2.70, dd (14.5, 4.4)
10	4.21, m	67.2, CH	4.14, m	68.6, CH
11	1.60, ddd (14.3, 10.6, 3.4)	47.1, CH2	1.71, ddd (13.9, 8.8, 7.6)	46.4, CH2
	1.55, ddd (14.3,10.6, 3.4)		1.61, ddd (13.9, 5.4, 4.3)
12	4.02, m	65.4, CH	4.00, m	67.0, CH
13	1.21, d (6.3)	24.5, CH3	1.20, d (6.2)	23.5, CH3

) suggested the presence of one methyl group [δ_H 1.21 (3H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, H-13)], two methylene groups [δ_H 2.65 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 4.9 Hz, H-9a), 2.59 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 8.0 Hz, H-9b); δ_H 1.60 (1H, ddd, J = 14.3, 10.6, 3.4 Hz, H-11a), 1.55 (1H, ddd, J = 14.3, 10.6, 3.4 Hz, H-11b], two methine groups [δ_H 4.21 (1H, m, H-10), 4.02 (1H, m, H-12)], and three olefinic protons [δ_H 6.37 (1H, s, H-4), 6.31 (2H, overlap, H-5, H-7)]. The ¹³C NMR spectrum of 4 (Table 2) showed 14 carbon resonances, including one methyl (δ_C 24.5), six quaternary sp² (δ_C 168.0, 167.5, 165.0, 156.3, 141.4, 100.0), two methylene sp³ (δ_C 47.1, 43.1), three methine sp² (δ_C 107.2, 103.8, 102.8), and two oxygen-bearing methine sp³ (δ_C 67.2, 65.4) carbons. Detailed analysis of the ¹H and ¹³C NMR data (Table 2) suggested that 4 belonged to the isocoumarin class, and its NMR data were similar to those of citreoisocoumarinol 5 [19]. Comparison of the NMR data of compounds 4 and 5 suggested that they differed only in the substituents on C-3. The absolute configuration of C-10 and C-12 of compound 4 was determined as 10R, 12S by applying Mosher’s methods to the 1, 3-anti-diol model as reported [20,21,22]. The procedure started with esterification of 4 with the two enantiomers of (R)- or (S)-MTPA chloride (4a = R or 4b = S) [23], and then the differences in chemical shift values (Δδ = δ_S − δ_R) for 4b and 4a were calculated to assign the configuration of C-10 and C-12 (Figure 3). So 4 was named 12-epicitreoisocoumarinol.

The genus Nectria has been reported as a prolific source of bioactive secondary metabolites, such as heptaketides with antimicrobial activity [24], terpenoids with anti-acetylcholinesterase and anti-β-glucuronidase activity [25], and phytotoxin with herbicidal activity [26]. Nectriacids A–C (1–3) were the first examples of polyenes derivatives with linear C₁₅ conjugated pentaene diacid derivatives containing three methyl groups. To date only a few examples of similar substances have been previously isolated. These include bixin and norbixin from Bixa orellana [27], crocetin from Crocus sativus [28], the monocarboxylic acid azafrin from Escobedia scabrifolia and E. linearis [29], and (3Z, 5E, 7E, 9E, 11E, 13Z, 15E, 17E)-18-methyl-19-oxoicosa-3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17-octaenoic acid and (3E, 5Z, 7E, 9E, 11E, 13E, 15Z, 17E, 19E)-20-methyl-21-oxodocosa-3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19-nonaenoic acid from white-rotting Basidiomycete [30].

The remaining three known compounds from the fungus Nectria sp. HN001 were identified as citreoisocoumarinol (5) [19,31], citreoisocoumarin (6) [19,31], and macrocarpon C (7) [19,31], by comparison of their MS and NMR data with those reported in the literature.

All of the isolates were evaluated for in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity [10]. The results showed that compounds 2 and 3 possessed stronger activity than positive control (acarbose, IC₅₀, 815.3 μM) with IC₅₀ values of 23.5 and 42.3 μM, respectively. However, compounds 4–6 showed moderate activity with IC₅₀ values ranging from 300 to 600 μM (

Table 3. Inhibitory effects of the isolates against α-glucosidase.

Compounds	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	Acarbose a
IC50 (μM) b	121.8 ± 0.4	23.5 ± 0.3	42.3 ± 0.2	343.7 ± 1.0	392.5 ± 1.7	538.7 ± 4.3	>900	815.3 ± 3.8

^a Positive control; ^b Data are shown as mean ± SD from three parallel measurements.

), while compound 7 did not display inhibitory activity compared to positive control. Interestingly, although compounds 1–3 possess same carbon skeleton, their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity are different. The activity against α-glucosidase for 2 (23.5 μM) and 3 (42.3 μM) was more potent than that for 1 (121.8 μM), which suggested that esterification of terminal carboxyl group (C-12) may play a key role in the inhibitory effects. Although compounds 2 and 3 possess different configuration of the C4–C5 double bonds, they exhibited the same level of activity. Meanwhile, compounds 4 and 5 exhibited relatively stronger activity when compared to 6.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General

Optical rotations were measured on a Bellingham-Stanley ADP 440+ polarimeter at 25 °C. IR data were recorded on a Nicolet 5DX-FTIR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Hudson, NH, USA), in KBr discs. UV data were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-240 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The ¹H NMR (500 MHz), ¹³C NMR (125 MHz), and 2D NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker AVANCE-500 (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) using TMS as an internal reference. HRESIMS were acquired on a Thermofisher LTQ Orbitrp Elite LC-MS spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Hudson, NH, USA), and the ESIMS data were measured on a Micro Mass Q-TOF spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). TLC analysis was carried out on silica gel plates (Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China). RP-C18 silica gel (Fuji, 40–75 μm, Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd., Kasugai, Japan), Silica gel (200–300 mesh, Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China), High silica gel (H, Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China), and Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Stockholm, Sweden) were used for column chromatography (CC). The chiral HPLC separation of compound 4 was accomplished over a S-Chiral A (column size: 4.6 × 250 mm 5 μm; Acchrom Technologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China; flow rate: 1.0 mL/min; solvent: n-hexane-isopropanol = 9:1, t_R 18.5 min). α-Glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (CAS number: 9001-42-7, E.C 3.2.1.20; Buchs, Switzerland). Acarbose (>98%) was purchased from Adamas-beta Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Fungal Material

The fungal strain HN001 was isolated from the branches of the mangrove plant Sonneratia ovata collected from the South China Sea in Hainan province, China. The fungus was identified by our team as Nectria sp. HN001, Nectriaceae, according to a molecular biological protocol by DNA amplification and sequencing of the ITS region [10] (deposited in GenBank, accession No. KU359411). A voucher strain was deposited in School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China, with the access code, 2015-HN001.

3.3. Fermentation, Extraction, and Isolation

The fungus Nectria sp. HN001 was primary cultivated on PDA medium (20 g of glucose, 20 g of agar, and 2 g of sea salt in 1 L of potato infusion). Plugs of agar supporting mycelial growth were cut and transferred aseptically to 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 mL of PDB medium (20 g of glucose and 2 g of sea salt in 1 L of potato infusion). The flasks were incubated at 28 °C on a rotary shaker for three days, and then the mycelia were aseptically transferred to a solid autoclaved rice substrate medium (60 × 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 50 g of rice and 50 mL of 0.3% of saline water) for 28 days at 25 °C. The mycelia and solid rice medium were extracted with MeOH (3 × 15 L, 24 h each) for three times. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to yield a crude extract (296 g), which was suspended in H₂O and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 3 L, 45 min each) to yield a crude ethyl acetate extract (110 g). The ethyl acetate extract (110 g) was chromatographed on silica gel column (400 g, 100–200 mesh, 10 × 70 cm) eluting with a step gradient of petroleum ether-EtOAc (100:0; 9:1; 8:2; 7:3; 6:4; 5:5; 4:6; 3:7; 0:100, v/v, each 2 L) to give nine fractions (F1–F9). F8 (1.5 g) was further fractionated on another silica gel column using petroleum-EtOAc (2 L, 8:2; 7:3; 6:4; 5:5; 4:6, v/v, each 400 mL) as the mobile phase to yield five subfractions (F801 to F805). Compound 1 (28 mg) was obtained from F802 by column chromatography on silica gel (gel H, 25 × 340 mm, 30 g) eluting with CHCl₃-MeOH (1 L, 95:5). Then, the F803 fraction was purified using HPLC on a semipreparative RP-HPLC column (250 × 9.4 mm, 5 μm), using with Acetonitrile-H₂O (55:45, v/v, flow rate: 1.0 mL/min) as the solvent system, to obtain 2 (18 mg, t_R 26.3 min) and 3 (15 mg, t_R 27.8 min). F804 was subjected to RP-18 using MeOH-H₂O (8:2, v/v) to give compounds 6 (35 mg) and 7 (8 mg). F805 was chromatographed on Sephadex LH-20 (110 g, 110 × 3 cm) eluting with CHCl₃-MeOH (1 L, 1:1, v/v) to give the mixture of F8051 (4 and 5). F8051 was conducted by the S-Chiral A (n-hexane-isopropanol = 9:1, v/v, flow rate: 1.0 mL/min) column to afford 4 (18 mg, t_R 18.5 min) and 5 (10 mg, t_R 25.5 min).

Nectriacid A (1): yellow powder; UV (MeOH) λ_max (log ε) 355 (4.70); IR (KBr) ν_max 3363, 2955, 2922, 2852, 1684, 1616, 1592, 1268, 1186, 980, 895, 855 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data, see Table 1; ESIMS m/z 261.1 [M − H]⁻; HRESIMS m/z 261.1130 [M − H]⁻ (calcd for C₁₅H₁₇O₄, 261.1132).

Nectriacid B (2): yellow powder; UV (MeOH) λ_max (log ε) 359 (4.23); IR (KBr) ν_max 3434, 2955, 2922, 2852, 1723, 1656, 1439, 1380, 1278, 1202, 1173, 984, 857 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data, see Table 1; ESIMS m/z 275.3 [M − H]⁻; HRESIMS m/z 275.1287 [M − H]⁻ (calcd for C₁₆H₁₉O₄, 275.1288).

Nectriacid C (3): pale yellow powder; UV (MeOH) λ_max (log ε) 355 (3.69); IR (KBr) ν_max 3365, 2956, 2922, 2852, 1723, 1655, 1634, 1464, 1439, 1380, 1280, 1202, 1174, 1073, 984, 720 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data, see Table 1; ESIMS m/z 275.4 [M − H]⁻; HRESIMS m/z 275.1287 [M − H]⁻ (calcd for C₁₆H₁₉O₄, 275.1288).

12-epicitreoisocoumarinol (4): colorless powder; ${\left[\mathsf{\alpha }\right]}_{\mathrm{D}}^{25}$ −13.3 (c 0.3, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λ_max (log ε) 245 (4.89); IR (KBr) ν_max 3394, 3191, 2962, 2921, 2850, 1681, 1629, 1588, 1510, 1466, 1382, 1241, 1172, 1134, 1065, 849, 798, 694 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR data, see Table 2; ESIMS m/z 279.4 [M − H]⁻; HRESIMS m/z 279.0871 [M − H]⁻ (calcd for C₁₄H₁₅O₆, 279.0874).

3.4. Preparation of (R)- and (S)-MTPA Esters of 4

As our previous reported method [23], 12-epicitreoisocoumarinol (4) (1 mg) was dissolved in 1 mL of pyridine and stirred at room temperature for 10 min. An excess of (R)- or (S)-MTPA chloride (10 μL) was added, and the reaction was stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the crude reaction product was purified by preparative silica gel TLC using pure dichloromethane as developing solvent.

¹H NMR data of (S)-MTPA ester of 4 (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 11.0 (1H, s, 8-OH), 7.60–7.29 (15H, m, Ar-H), 6.70 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-5), 6.42 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-7), 5.87 (1H, s, H-4), 5.34 (1H, m, H-10), 5.07 (1H, m, H-12), 3.66-3.45 (9H, s, 3-OCH₃), 2.72 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 5.0 Hz, H-9a), 2.71 (1H, dd, J = 15.1, 6.7 Hz, H-9b), 1.99 (1H, m, H-11a), 1.96 (1H, m, H-11b), 1.27 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H-13); ESIMS m/z 927.2 [M − H]⁻.

¹H NMR data of (R)-MTPA ester of 4 (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ_H 11.0 (1H, s, 8-OH), 7.61–7.29 (15H, m, Ar-H), 6.71 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, H-5), 6.48 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, H-7), 5.97 (1H, s, H-4), 5.18 (1H, m, H-10), 5.06 (1H, m, H-12), 3.66-3.48 (9H, s, 3-OCH₃), 2.71 (1H, overlap, H-9a), 2.70 (1H, overlap, H-9b), 1.96 (1H, m, H-11a), 1.93 (1H, m, H-11b), 1.32 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H-13); ESIMS m/z 927.2 [M − H]⁻.

3.5. In Vitro Inhibition Studies on α-Glucosidase

An assay of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity was performed using a reported method, with slight modifications [10]. All the assays were performed using 0.01 M KH₂PO₄-K₂HPO₄ buffers, pH 7.0, and a Bio-Rad iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Kyoto, Japan). Enzyme solution was prepared to give 2.0 Units/mL in 2 mL aliquots. The assay medium contained phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (130 μL), 10 μL of enzyme solution, 20 μL of DMSO or inhibitor (dissolved in DMSO), and 40 μL of substrate (p-nitrophenyl glycoside, 3 mg/mL). The substrate was added to the assay medium containing enzyme and buffer with inhibitor added after 15 min of incubation time at 37 °C. The activity was determined by measuring the increase in absorbance at 405 nm for a 1 min interval. Calculations were performed according to the equation:

η (%) = [(B − S)/B] × 100%

(B stands for the assay medium with DMSO; S stands for the assay medium with inhibitor). All measurements were done in triplicate from two independent experiments. The reported IC₅₀ was the average value of two independent experiments.

4. Conclusions

Four new (1–4) and three known polyketides (5–7) were isolated and identified from the culture of the endophytic fungus Nectria sp. HN001. Compounds 2 and 3 exhibited stronger inhibitory activity on α-glucosidase than positive control [10]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of the C₁₅ conjugated pentaene diacid derivatives. This finding can allow us to explore structural diversity of linear polyene diacid derivatives and offer new guidance to discover α-glucosidase inhibitors.