Next Article in Journal
An Integral Model for Target Tracking Based on the Use of a WSN
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Modal Sensory Integration of Visual-Tactile Motion Information: Instrument Design and Human Psychophysics
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2013, 13(6), 7224-7249; doi:10.3390/s130607224

Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods

Department of Geomatics Engineering, the University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the University of Houston, N107 Engineering Building 1, Houston, TX 77204-4003, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 March 2013 / Revised: 7 April 2013 / Accepted: 14 May 2013 / Published: 31 May 2013
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)


Terrestrial laser scanners are sophisticated instruments that operate much like high-speed total stations. It has previously been shown that unmodelled systematic errors can exist in modern terrestrial laser scanners that deteriorate their geometric measurement precision and accuracy. Typically, signalised targets are used in point-based self-calibrations to identify and model the systematic errors. Although this method has proven its effectiveness, a large quantity of signalised targets is required and is therefore labour-intensive and limits its practicality. In recent years, feature-based self-calibration of aerial, mobile terrestrial, and static terrestrial laser scanning systems has been demonstrated. In this paper, the commonalities and differences between point-based and plane-based self-calibration (in terms of model identification and parameter correlation) are explored. The results of this research indicate that much of the knowledge from point-based self-calibration can be directly transferred to plane-based calibration and that the two calibration approaches are nearly equivalent. New network configurations, such as the inclusion of tilted scans, were also studied and prove to be an effective means for strengthening the self-calibration solution, and improved recoverability of the horizontal collimation axis error for hybrid scanners, which has always posed a challenge in the past. View Full-Text
Keywords: LiDAR; terrestrial laser scanners; calibration; accuracy; error analysis; quality assurance LiDAR; terrestrial laser scanners; calibration; accuracy; error analysis; quality assurance

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chow, J.C.K.; Lichti, D.D.; Glennie, C.; Hartzell, P. Improvements to and Comparison of Static Terrestrial LiDAR Self-Calibration Methods. Sensors 2013, 13, 7224-7249.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top