<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Sensors</journal-id>
<journal-title>Sensors</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1424-8220</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/s100504686</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">sensors-10-04686</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Diode Laser Detection of Greenhouse Gases in the Near-Infrared Region by Wavelength Modulation Spectroscopy: Pressure Dependence of the Detection Sensitivity</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Asakawa</surname><given-names>Takashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-sensors-10-04686"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kanno</surname><given-names>Nozomu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-sensors-10-04686"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tonokura</surname><given-names>Kenichi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-sensors-10-04686"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-sensors-10-04686">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-sensors-10-04686">
<label>1</label> Department of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan; E-Mail: <email>asakawa@esc.u-tokyo.ac.jp</email></aff>
<aff id="af2-sensors-10-04686">
<label>2</label> Department of Micro-Nano Systems Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan; E-Mail: <email>kanno@yoshilab.nuae.nagoya-u.ac.jp</email></aff>
<aff id="af3-sensors-10-04686">
<label>3</label> Environmental Science Center, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-sensors-10-04686">
<label>*</label> Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: <email>tonokura@esc.u-tokyo.ac.jp</email>; Tel.: +81-3-5841-2119; Fax: +81-3-5841-2119.</corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>6</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2010</year></pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<fpage>4686</fpage>
<lpage>4699</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2010</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>13</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2010</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2010</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© 2010 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2010</copyright-year>
<license>
<p>This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (<ext-link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" ext-link-type="uri">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link>).</p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>We have investigated the pressure dependence of the detection sensitivity of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> using wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) with distributed feed-back diode lasers in the near infrared region. The spectral line shapes and the background noise of the second harmonics (2<italic>f</italic>) detection of the WMS were analyzed theoretically. We determined the optimum pressure conditions in the detection of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub>, by taking into consideration the background noise in the WMS. At the optimum total pressure for the detection of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub>, the limits of detection in the present system were determined.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>gas sensing</kwd>
<kwd>wavelength modulation spectroscopy</kwd>
<kwd>near-infrared absorption spectroscopy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<label>1.</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Atmospheric pollution is a problem as global warming is caused by the man-made addition of extra amounts of greenhouse gases such as CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub>. Current average mixing ratios of the trace components CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> in the atmosphere are ∼380, ∼1.8 and ∼0.32 parts per million by volume (ppmv), respectively. CO<sub>2</sub> is released into the atmosphere when fossil fuels, coal, solid waste and wood products are burned, during cement production, and also when land surface cover is changed by humans. Increased CH<sub>4</sub> levels come from fossil fuels, rice cultivation, animal husbandry, biomass burning and landfills. The main anthropogenic sources of N<sub>2</sub>O are agriculture, and industrial sources including adipic and nitric acid production. Combustion of solid waste and fossil fuels also contributes to atmospheric N<sub>2</sub>O. The need to detect these trace gases has become increasingly important in recent years, both for controlling industrial processes and for monitoring air quality. Since many trace gases have a significant impact on the environment, the development of techniques for its fast, accurate and sensitive detection is required [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-sensors-10-04686">1</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-sensors-10-04686">5</xref>].</p>
<p>Laser based spectroscopy provides interesting advantages related to its high selectivity and sensitivity in the detection of trace gases. Semiconductor diode lasers emitted the near infrared (NIR) light have played a central role, being tunable spectroscopic light sources which exhibit a relatively low amplitude noise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-sensors-10-04686">6</xref>]. In addition, their small size and the relatively low cost have made them particularly suitable for the realization of transportable spectrometers employed for <italic>in-situ</italic> measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-sensors-10-04686">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-sensors-10-04686">8</xref>]. In the NIR region, relatively weak overtone or combination vibrational transitions occur for trace gases relevant to the atmospheric environment. Although line strengths of these transitions are a few orders of magnitude lower than transitions belonging to fundamental vibrational bands, cavity ring down spectroscopy (CRDS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-sensors-10-04686">9</xref>] and frequency modulation spectroscopy (FMS) with a single-mode diode laser in the near infrared region have allowed to achieve the detection of low concentrations (&lt; sub ppmv) of trace gases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-sensors-10-04686">10</xref>]. The use of multi-pass absorption cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-sensors-10-04686">11</xref>] further improves the sensitivity, since the effective optical path is increased up to several tens or hundreds of meters. Phase-sensitive techniques, which are the core of the FM techniques, significantly reduces the 1/<italic>f</italic> electronic noise, achieving high detection sensitivity. In most cases the detection sensitivity is only limited by noise introduced by undesired optical fringes and drifting of laser power and detector sensitivity. Wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-sensors-10-04686">12</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-sensors-10-04686">16</xref>] is a kind of FMS with a modulation frequency lower than the spectral line width of interest. In the case of WMS, the lower modulation frequency allows one to use low-frequency circuits and photo detectors, reducing the complexity and the cost of measurement system. Recently, a high sensitive open path CH<sub>4</sub> analyzer based on WMS detection and Herriott cell design with a 30 m total optical path length has been developed which is commercially available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-sensors-10-04686">17</xref>].</p>
<p>In the present study, we demonstrate the detection of greenhouse gases such as CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O using WMS. The aim of this work is characterized the optimum condition of the detection of greenhouse gases by NIR-WMS. The optimum pressure for the detection of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> by WMS is investigated both experimentally and theoretically by taking into consideration background noise in the WMS.</p></sec>
<sec>
<label>2.</label>
<title>Experimental</title>
<p>We used WMS in the near-infrared region for trace gas detection. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1-sensors-10-04686">Figure 1</xref> shows a scheme of our experimental apparatus. All optical elements were properly designed to reduce their dimensions and mechanical instability as much as possible. Three distributed feed-back (DFB) diode lasers (NTT Electronics) with a tuning range of ± 1 nm were used as light sources. The first DFB laser with a center wavelength of 1,572 nm was used to detect CO<sub>2</sub> at the 3ν<sub>1</sub> + ν<sub>3</sub> combination band. The second DFB laser with a center wavelength of 1,515 nm was used to detect the N<sub>2</sub>O line at the 3ν<sub>3</sub> overtone band. The last DFB laser with a center wavelength of 1,651 nm was used to detect CH<sub>4</sub> at the 2ν<sub>3</sub> overtone band. The laser power varied as a function of injection current with a maximum of 20 mW. The wavelengths of these DFB lasers were chosen for strong absorbing transitions and no interference of water.</p>
<p>The laser wavelengths were tuned by varying the laser temperatures, while fine tuning was accomplished by changing the laser diode injection currents. To minimize fringe noise from optics, anti-reflection (AR) coated lenses and AR coated and wedged windows were used. The output beam was focused by an AR coated lens (f = 50 cm) to the centre of a Herriott-type multi-pass cell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-sensors-10-04686">11</xref>] with a distance of 40.4 cm between two mirrors. In the multi-pass cell, the laser beam undergoes multiple reflections between two mirrors; the total number of 74 passes corresponds to the optical path length of 29.91 m. The inner volume of the cell is 900 cm<sup>3</sup>. The beam passed through the multi-pass cell was finally focused by a short focal AR coated lens (f = 5 cm) onto an InGaAs photodiode detector (Hamamatsu G5852-11).</p>
<p>The laser wavelength was sinusoidally modulated at 10 kHz, and scanned at 1 Hz around the absorption line. The laser wavelength scan and modulation were performed through a custom-made laser driver. The background bias signal of the laser driver used in this study was same level as that of a commercial driver (e.g., ILX LDC3724C). Under typical conditions, the modulated absorption signal was phase-sensitive detection at twice the modulation frequency (2<italic>f</italic>) using a lock-in amplifier (Stanford Research System SR810 DSP) with the time constant set to 3 ms. The data was acquired via a 16 bit AD PCMCIA card (CONTEC ADA16-8/2(CB)L) to a laptop computer and analyzed using software written in LabVIEW.</p>
<p>N<sub>2</sub> (99.99%) and premixed gases of synthesized air (79% N<sub>2</sub>, 21% O<sub>2</sub>), 1% CO<sub>2</sub> in N<sub>2</sub>, 1% N<sub>2</sub>O in N<sub>2</sub>, and 0.1% CH<sub>4</sub> in air were purchased from Taiyo Nippon Sanso Co. The flow rate of the feed was controlled with mass flow controllers (Kofloc MODEL3660). The total pressure was monitored with a capacitance manometer (Setra Systems MODEL720). All measurements were performed at room temperature (293 ± 3 K).</p></sec>
<sec>
<label>3.</label>
<title>WMS Theory</title>
<p>The general theory of the FMS and WMS has been well summarized in the works of previous researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-sensors-10-04686">13</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-sensors-10-04686">15</xref>]. In the case of sinusoidal modulation with modulation index <italic>β</italic> and frequency <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub>, the optical field <italic>E</italic> with carrier frequency <italic>ω</italic><sub>0</sub> is given by:
<disp-formula id="FD1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>sin</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">in</mml:mi>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where the expansion in a series of <italic>n</italic>th-order Bessel functions <italic>J<sub>n</sub></italic> characterizes the frequency components of the modulated light spectrum. FMS is classified by its modulation frequency <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub>. WMS uses <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub> that is much less than the spectral line width <italic>Γ</italic> of the absorption line of interest. Conversely, narrowly-defined FMS uses <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub> ≫ <italic>Γ</italic>. In the case of WMS, the probe beam modulation is generally treated as instantaneous frequency change:
<disp-formula id="FD2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>≡</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>sin</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>Δ</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where the maximum frequency deviation from the carrier frequency <italic>ω</italic><sub>0</sub> is Δ<italic>F</italic> = <italic>βω</italic><sub>m</sub>. In this model, dispersion effects cannot be considered, and the light intensity transmitted through the sample is expressed by <italic>I</italic><sub>T</sub> = <italic>I</italic><sub>0</sub> exp(−<italic>α</italic>), where <italic>α</italic> is the absorption coefficient.</p>
<p>On the assumption that <italic>α</italic>(<italic>ω</italic>) ≪ 1, <italic>I</italic><sub>T</sub>(<italic>ω</italic>) ≈ <italic>I</italic><sub>0</sub>(<italic>ω</italic>)[1 − <italic>α</italic>(<italic>ω</italic>)], the <italic>α</italic>(<italic>ω</italic>) can be expanded into the Taylor series around the carrier frequency <italic>ω</italic><sub>0</sub>:
<disp-formula id="FD3">
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>⌊</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>!</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>!</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>…</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>⌊</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>Δ</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>!</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>Δ</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>!</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>Δ</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>⁡</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>…</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Here cos<sup>2</sup> <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>t</italic>, cos<sup>3</sup> <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>t</italic>, <italic>etc</italic>., have been expanded with trigonometric identities for convenience in picking off the power at any frequency of interest. Because the instantaneous frequency varies sinusoidally, the Taylor series of <italic>I</italic><sub>T</sub>(<italic>ω</italic>) is more or less automatically the Fourier series, too. This series will not converge well for some Δ<italic>F</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-sensors-10-04686">16</xref>]. However, if the frequency deviation Δ<italic>F</italic> is sufficiently small compared with <italic>Γ</italic>, higher-order terms can be neglected, and the WMS signal that is coherently detected at the frequency <italic>nω</italic><sub>m</sub> is proportional to the <italic>n</italic>-th derivative of the sample absorption.</p>
<p>In the present study, the assumption that Δ<italic>F</italic> ≪ <italic>Γ</italic> was not valid under some experimental conditions. Thus we used the frequency domain approach to calculate the WMS spectral line shape. In the real system, the DFB laser intensity is not uniform over the FM range, and simultaneous amplitude modulation (AM) of the electric field occurs such that:
<disp-formula id="FD4">
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>sin</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>sin</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where <italic>M</italic> and <italic>ψ</italic> denote the AM index and the phase difference between AM and FM. By expanding the AM term in term of exponentials, <italic>i.e.</italic>, <italic>M</italic>sin(<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>t</italic> + <italic>ψ</italic>) = <italic>M</italic>/2[exp{<italic>i</italic>(<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>t</italic> + <italic>ψ</italic>)} − exp{<italic>i</italic>(<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>t</italic> + <italic>ψ</italic>)}], and replacing the exponential frequency terms as a summation over Bessel functions, one can rewrite <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD4">Equation (4)</xref> as:
<disp-formula id="FD5">
<label>(5)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">in</mml:mi>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where:
<disp-formula id="FD6">
<label>(6)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>J</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>±</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>±</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>±</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula><xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD1">Equation (1)</xref> is the special case of <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD5">Equation (5)</xref> where <italic>M</italic> = 0.</p>
<p>When the modulated electric field <italic>E</italic>(<italic>t</italic>) is passed through a medium exhibiting the field amplitude attenuation <italic>δ</italic>(<italic>ω</italic>) and the optical phase shift <italic>φ</italic>(<italic>ω</italic>), the transmitted optical field is then:
<disp-formula id="FD7">
<label>(7)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>δ</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>φ</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">in</mml:mi>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>ω</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where <italic>δ<sub>n</sub></italic> = <italic>δ</italic>(<italic>ω</italic><sub>0</sub> + <italic>nω</italic><sub>m</sub>) and <italic>φ</italic><sub>n</sub> = <italic>φ</italic>(<italic>ω</italic><sub>0</sub> + <italic>nω</italic><sub>m</sub>). Because the intensity <italic>I</italic> equals <italic>cɛ</italic><sub>0</sub><italic>EE*</italic>/2 in SI units, the absorption coefficient <italic>α</italic> is twice the electric field amplitude attenuation coefficient <italic>δ</italic> for weak absorption. The transmitted intensity can be expressed as a sum of Fourier components at frequencies corresponding to multiples of <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-sensors-10-04686">13</xref>]. In the case of 2<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub> detection, the resulting signal is:
<disp-formula id="FD8">
<label>(8)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Re</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>θ</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Im</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>sin</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>   </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>   </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>   </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>   </mml:mi>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>∑</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>∞</mml:mo></mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>δ</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>δ</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>φ</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>φ</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where <italic>θ</italic> refers to the phase difference between the transmitted intensity and the reference signal in the lock-in amplifier. The in-phase (0 or π) component corresponds to absorption, and the quadrature (±π/2) components correspond to dispersion of the incident light. In the absence of absorption and dispersion, <italic>Z</italic> has a nonzero value due to residual amplitude modulation (RAM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-sensors-10-04686">14</xref>]. In the case of 2<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub> detection, the background bias signal is:
<disp-formula id="FD9">
<label>(9)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>RAM</mml:mtext></mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub>
<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>cos</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>θ</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
<p>Since <italic>I</italic><sub>RAM</sub> linearly depends on <italic>I</italic><sub>0</sub>, low frequency noise in <italic>I</italic><sub>0</sub>, such as fringe noise from optics and drifting of laser power and detector sensitivity, within the noise equivalent bandwidth of the lock-in amplifier is converted into FM/WM signal background noise.</p>
<p>WM spectra are calculated from <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD8">Equation (8)</xref> assuming that the absorption peak shape is described by the Voigt function. The Voigt function was calculated following the algorithm described by Humlicek [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-sensors-10-04686">18</xref>] and Schreier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19-sensors-10-04686">19</xref>]. The Doppler half width at half maximum (HWHM) was calculated from the temperature and molecular weight. To calculate homogeneous HWHM values, the pressure broadening factor was taken from the HITRAN database [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-sensors-10-04686">20</xref>]. The FM index <italic>β</italic> was estimated from <italic>β</italic> = Δ<italic>F</italic>/<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub>. To calculate the AM index <italic>M</italic>, the intensity dependence on the laser frequency was measured, separate from the WMS experiments. <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-sensors-10-04686">Table 1</xref> shows the parameters used in the spectral simulation. For the modulation frequency below 750 MHz, the AM-FM phase difference <italic>ψ</italic> has been found to have a value of ca. <italic>n</italic>π + π/2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-sensors-10-04686">14</xref>]. For the present study, negative dependence of the laser intensity on the laser frequency suggests that <italic>ψ</italic> ≈ −π/2. In the WMS condition, <italic>i.e.</italic>, <italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub> ≪ <italic>Γ</italic>, the dispersion term is negligibly smaller than the absorption term, thus the detection phase <italic>θ</italic> ≈ 0 for the maximum signal intensity. In all calculations, the values of <italic>ψ</italic> and <italic>θ</italic> were fixed to be –π/2 and 0, respectively. The signal intensity and noise are defined as peak-to-baseline amplitude and peak-to-peak variation of 2f signal with standard deviation of baseline, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2-sensors-10-04686">Figure 2</xref>.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
<label>4.</label>
<title>Results and Discussion</title>
<p>For the detection of CO<sub>2</sub>, we used the 3ν<sub>1</sub> + ν<sub>3</sub> combination band of the R(16) line at the absorption line center of 6,359.97 cm<sup>−1</sup>, which is free from interference by the other atmospheric species and has a line strength of 1.73 × 10<sup>−23</sup> cm<sup>2</sup> molecule<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>, according to the HITRAN database [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-sensors-10-04686">20</xref>]. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2-sensors-10-04686">Figure 2</xref> shows experimental and simulated spectra of 1% CO<sub>2</sub> at a total pressure of 15 kPa, diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. The experimental spectra were acquired with a lock-in time constant of 3 ms and filter slope of 24 dB/oct, which leads a noise equivalent bandwidth of the low pass filter to be 26 Hz. The simulated spectrum reconstructed the experimental spectrum well. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-sensors-10-04686">Figure 3</xref> shows the total pressure dependence of signal intensity and background noise. In all experiments, the modulation depth Δ<italic>F</italic> were adjusted to obtain the maximum signal intensity. The concentration of CO<sub>2</sub> was maintained at 1% in N<sub>2</sub>. In the simulation, we assumed that background noise was linearly dependent on <italic>M</italic><sup>2</sup>, according <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD9">Equation (9)</xref>, and the simulated noise intensities were normalized to minimize the residual to experimental values. As can be seen, the simulated results closely agree with the experimental measurements. The signal intensity profile of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-sensors-10-04686">Figure 3</xref> shows two opposing effects of pressure: decreasing spectral line centre intensities due to pressure broadening and an increasing absorber number density with increasing pressure. At low pressures (Doppler regime), the signal intensity increases linearly with pressure, while at high pressures (Lorentzian regime) the signal intensity become almost constant due to the canceling of two opposing terms with pressure. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4-sensors-10-04686">Figure 4</xref> shows experimental and simulated profiles of the signal to noise ratio (S/N) as a function of total pressure. The optimum total pressure in the detection of CO<sub>2</sub> was found to be around 7 kPa. In the WMS, optimization of the signal intensity occurs at Δ<italic>F</italic>/HWHM = 2.2 in the Voigt function to calculate the properties of the 2<italic>f</italic> line shape [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21-sensors-10-04686">21</xref>].</p>
<p>Because the Voigt HWHM is increased by pressure broadening with increasing pressure, the frequency deviation Δ<italic>F</italic> must be increased in order to maximize the WMS signal with increasing pressure. Since the AM index <italic>M</italic> depends linearly on Δ<italic>F</italic>, <italic>i.e.</italic>, <italic>M</italic>/<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>β</italic> (= <italic>M</italic>/Δ<italic>F</italic>) is constant, and the residual amplitude modulation <italic>I</italic><sub>RAM</sub> is linearly dependent on <italic>M</italic><sup>2</sup> according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD9">Equation (9)</xref>, the low frequency noise in <italic>I</italic><sub>0</sub> such as the fringe noise from optics and drifting of laser power and detector sensitivity was enlarged by factor of <italic>M</italic><sup>2</sup> at higher pressure, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-sensors-10-04686">Figure 3</xref>.</p>
<p>In the case of N<sub>2</sub>O detection, the 3ν<sub>3</sub> overtone band of the R(15) absorption line at 6,591.44 cm<sup>−1</sup> with a line strength of 2.33 × 10<sup>−23</sup> cm<sup>2</sup> molecule<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup> was monitored. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5-sensors-10-04686">Figure 5</xref> shows the experimental and simulated spectra of 1% N<sub>2</sub>O at a total pressure of 6 kPa. As for the previous experiment of CO<sub>2</sub>, the acquired 2<italic>f</italic> WM spectrum of N<sub>2</sub>O shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5-sensors-10-04686">Figure 5</xref> is in excellent agreement with the simulated spectrum. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6-sensors-10-04686">Figure 6</xref> shows the total pressure dependence of signal intensity and background noise for the 1 % N<sub>2</sub>O diluted in N<sub>2</sub>. The signal intensity is saturated above 20 kPa. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7-sensors-10-04686">Figure 7</xref> shows experimental and simulated profiles of S/N as a function of total pressure. The simulated results agreed with the experimental results. The optimum total pressure for the detection of N<sub>2</sub>O is estimated to be around 6 kPa.</p>
<p>For the detection of CH<sub>4</sub>, we used the R(3) lines of the 2ν<sub>3</sub> overtone band around 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup> with a line strength of the order 10<sup>−21</sup> cm<sup>2</sup> molecule<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-sensors-10-04686">20</xref>]. As listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2-sensors-10-04686">Table 2</xref>, there are three absorption peaks at around 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8-sensors-10-04686">Figure 8</xref> shows the experimental and simulated spectra of 0.01% CH<sub>4</sub> at around 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup> and total pressure of 10 kPa. The three absorption lines were considered in the simulation. In the experimental spectra, only one absorption peak was observed at 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup> due to the overlapping of the three absorptions. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9-sensors-10-04686">Figure 9</xref> shows the total pressure dependence of signal intensity and noise for the 0.01 % CH<sub>4</sub> diluted in N<sub>2</sub>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10-sensors-10-04686">Figure 10</xref> shows the experimental and simulated profiles of S/N as a function of total pressure. The simulated spectrum using the three absorption lines reproduces the experimental results well. The optimum total pressure of CH<sub>4</sub> detection at the 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup> absorption peak was found to be around 15 kPa. The larger optimum pressure for CH<sub>4</sub> detection compared with those for CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O would be caused by the broader nature of the absorption peak consisting of three closely separated absorption lines.</p>
<p>To estimate the limit of detection (LOD) of the present system, we changed the mixing ratio of sample gases, while keeping the optimum value of the total pressure fixed. The measurements were performed with a noise equivalent bandwidth of 26 Hz. From a fit of the signal intensity as a function of CO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratio at 7 kPa, we found, for a signal to noise ratio of 2, the LOD of [CO<sub>2</sub>]<sup>7kPa</sup> = 24 ± 2 ppmv. In the case of N<sub>2</sub>O, the LOD at 6 kPa was estimated to be 7.6 ± 0.4 ppmv. For CH<sub>4</sub>, we estimated the detection limit and NEAS using the R(3) peaks at 15 kPa to be 60 ± 4 ppbv. The LODs for the three gases had an almost linear dependence on the absorption cross sections. The line strengths of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> of the used transitions vary slightly with temperature (0.23, 0.25 and 0.39%, respectively, by temperature change of 1 K around room temperature), however, the LODs are unaffected by temperature change. Parkes <italic>et al.</italic> demonstrated the detection of N<sub>2</sub>O by diode laser cavity ring-down spectroscopy using the same 3ν<sub>3</sub> overtone band [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22-sensors-10-04686">22</xref>]. The limiting sensitivity was 23 ppmv at 1 atm with mirror reflectivities of R = 0.9998, which is comparable with our 2<italic>f</italic> WMS value of 7.6 ppmv. The noise-equivalent absorption sensitivity (NEAS) per scan for a signal to noise ratio of 1 was estimated using following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="FD10">Equation (10)</xref>:
<disp-formula id="FD10">
<label>(10)</label>
<mml:math display="block">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">NEAS</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Abs</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">NEBW</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>where <italic>Abs</italic><sub>min</sub>, <italic>l</italic>, <italic>NEBW</italic> and <italic>N</italic> denote the absorbance at S/N = 1, the effective optical length of 29.91 m, the noise equivalent bandwidth of 26 Hz and the average number of 20 times, respectively. In the calculation of <italic>Abs</italic><sub>min</sub>, the absorption line shapes were assumed to be described as the Voigt functions. The estimated values of NEAS for CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> were found to be (1.3 ± 0.1) × 10<sup>−8</sup>, (4.8 ± 0.3) × 10<sup>−9</sup>, and (5.6 ± 0.4) × 10<sup>−9</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup> Hz<sup>−1/2</sup>, respectively. The higher value of NEAS for CO<sub>2</sub> would be caused by the larger value of <italic>M</italic>/<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>β</italic>, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-sensors-10-04686">Table 1</xref>, which results the larger effect of the residual amplitude modulation.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5.</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>We have described the highly sensitive detection of CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> by 2<italic>f</italic> WMS, using tunable near-infrared diode lasers in the near-infrared region. The observed 2<italic>f</italic> WM spectra were analyzed as a function of the total pressure. At the optimum total pressure for the detection of each gas, as determined by experimental and theoretical approaches, the limits of detection in the present system were determined. Detection of atmospheric N<sub>2</sub>O (320 ppbv) at the 3ν<sub>3</sub> overtone band is not sufficient with our current WMS spectrometer. However, the necessary sensitivity could be delivered by reducing the optical fringe noise and the drifting of laser power using external modulators instead of direct laser modulation.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>This work was supported by the Industrial Technology Research Grant program from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan. The authors acknowledge the helpful suggestions of the referees.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-sensors-10-04686"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fried</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wert</surname><given-names>B.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Walega</surname><given-names>J.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tittel</surname><given-names>F.K.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development of a tunable mid-IR difference frequency laser source for highly sensitive airborne trace gas detection</article-title><source>Appl. Phys. B</source><year>2002</year><volume>75</volume><fpage>281</fpage><lpage>288</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00340-002-0948-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12599397</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-sensors-10-04686"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gianfrani</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sasso</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tino</surname><given-names>G.M.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Monitoring of O<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> using tunable diode lasers in the near-infrared region</article-title><source>Sens. Actuat. B</source><year>1997</year><volume>38</volume><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>285</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-sensors-10-04686"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uehara</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kikugawa</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoshida</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isotope analysis of environmental substances by a new laser-spectroscopic method utilizing different path lengths</article-title><source>Sens. Actuat. B</source><year>2001</year><volume>74</volume><fpage>173</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0925-4005(00)00729-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-sensors-10-04686"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hennig</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Strzoda</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Magori</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chemisky</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tump</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fleischer</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meixner</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eisele</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hand-held unit for simultaneous detection of methane and ethane based on NIR-absorption spectroscopy</article-title><source>Sens. Actuat. B</source><year>2003</year><volume>95</volume><fpage>151</fpage><lpage>156</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00399-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-sensors-10-04686"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katchalski</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soria</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Teitelbaum</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Friesem</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marowsky</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Two photon fluorescence sensors based on resonant grating waveguide structures</article-title><source>Sens. Actuat. B</source><year>2005</year><volume>107</volume><fpage>121</fpage><lpage>125</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.snb.2004.07.040</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-sensors-10-04686"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Werle</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A Review of recent advances in semiconductor laser based gas monitors</article-title><source>Spectrochim. Acta A</source><year>1998</year><volume>54</volume><fpage>197</fpage><lpage>236</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1386-1425(97)00227-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-sensors-10-04686"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Linnerud</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaspersen</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jager</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Gas monitoring in the process industry using diode laser spectroscopy</article-title><source>Appl. Phys. B</source><year>1998</year><volume>67</volume><fpage>297</fpage><lpage>305</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s003400050509</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-sensors-10-04686"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Werle</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mucke</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>D’Amato</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lancai</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Near-infrared trace-gas sensors based on room-temperature diode lasers</article-title><source>Appl. Phys. B</source><year>1998</year><volume>67</volume><fpage>307</fpage><lpage>315</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s003400050510</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-sensors-10-04686"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crosson</surname><given-names>E.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and water</article-title><source>Appl. Phys. B</source><year>2008</year><volume>92</volume><fpage>403</fpage><lpage>408</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-sensors-10-04686"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>L.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>J.L.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Ultrasensitive detections in atomic and molecular physics: demonstration in molecular overtone spectroscopy</article-title><source>J. Opt. Soc. Am. B</source><year>1998</year><volume>15</volume><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/JOSAB.15.000006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-sensors-10-04686"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herriott</surname><given-names>D.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schulte</surname><given-names>H.J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folded optical delay lines</article-title><source>Appl. Opt</source><year>1965</year><volume>4</volume><fpage>883</fpage><lpage>889</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/AO.4.000883</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-sensors-10-04686"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pavone</surname><given-names>F.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Inguscio</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Frequency- and wavelength-modulation spectroscopies: Comparison of experimental methods using an AlGaAs diode laser</article-title><source>Appl. Phys. B</source><year>1993</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>118</fpage><lpage>122</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00325250</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-sensors-10-04686"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>D.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Warren</surname><given-names>R.E.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Frequency modulation spectroscopy with lead-salt diode lasers: a comparison of single-tone and two-tone techniques</article-title><source>Appl. Opt</source><year>1987</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>3726</fpage><lpage>3732</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/AO.26.003726</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20490130</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-sensors-10-04686"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Silver</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Frequency-modulation spectroscopy for trace species detection: theory and comparison among experimental methods</article-title><source>Appl. Opt</source><year>1992</year><volume>31</volume><fpage>707</fpage><lpage>717</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/AO.31.000707</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20720674</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-sensors-10-04686"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Supplee</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Whittaker</surname><given-names>E.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lenth</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Theoretical description of frequency modulation and wavelength modulation spectroscopy</article-title><source>Appl. Opt</source><year>1994</year><volume>33</volume><fpage>6294</fpage><lpage>6302</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1364/AO.33.006294</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20941160</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-sensors-10-04686"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>G.V.H.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Modulation broadening of NMR and ESR line shapes</article-title><source>J. Appl. Phys</source><year>1963</year><volume>34</volume><fpage>3276</fpage><lpage>3285</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.1729177</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-sensors-10-04686"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>LI-COR Bioscience HP</collab></person-group><comment>Available on line: <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.licor.com/env/Products/GasAnalyzers/li7700/7700.jsp" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.licor.com/env/Products/GasAnalyzers/li7700/7700.jsp</ext-link> (Access on February 2010).</comment></citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-sensors-10-04686"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Humlicek</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Optimized computation of the Voigt and complex probability functions</article-title><source>J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer</source><year>1982</year><volume>27</volume><fpage>437</fpage><lpage>444</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-4073(82)90078-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-sensors-10-04686"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schreier</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Voigt and complex error function: A comparison of computational methods</article-title><source>J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer</source><year>1992</year><volume>48</volume><fpage>743</fpage><lpage>762</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-4073(92)90139-U</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-sensors-10-04686"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rothman</surname><given-names>L.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacquemart</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barbe</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Benner</surname><given-names>D.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Birk</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>L.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carleer</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chackerian</surname><given-names>C.</given-names><suffix>Jr.</suffix></name><name><surname>Chance</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Coudert</surname><given-names>L.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dana</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devi</surname><given-names>V.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Flaud</surname><given-names>J.-M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gamache</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Goldman</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hartmann</surname><given-names>J.-M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jucks</surname><given-names>K.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maki</surname><given-names>A.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandin</surname><given-names>J.-Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Massie</surname><given-names>S.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Orphal</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perrin</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rinsland</surname><given-names>C.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>M.A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tennyson</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tolchenov</surname><given-names>R.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Toth</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Auwera</surname><given-names>J.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Varanasi</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The HITRAN 2004 molecular spectroscopic database</article-title><source>J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer</source><year>2005</year><volume>96</volume><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>204</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.10.008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-sensors-10-04686"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reid</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Labrie</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Second-harmonic detection with tunable diode lasers-Comparison of experiment and theory</article-title><source>Appl. Phys. B</source><year>1981</year><volume>26</volume><fpage>203</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00692448</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-sensors-10-04686"><label>22.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parkes</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Linsley</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Orr-Ewing</surname><given-names>A.J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Absorption cross-sections and pressure broadening of rotational lines in the 3ν<sub>3</sub> band of N<sub>2</sub>O determined by diode laser cavity ring-down spectroscopy</article-title><source>Chem. Phys. Lett</source><year>2003</year><volume>377</volume><fpage>439</fpage><lpage>444</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0009-2614(03)01155-2</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Tables</title>
<fig id="f1-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic diagram of the experimental setup (MFC: mass flow controller. Func. Gen.: function generator).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f1.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental (solid line) and simulated (dashed line) 2<italic>f</italic> wavelength modulation spectra of 1% CO<sub>2</sub> at around 6,359.97 cm<sup>−1</sup> and a total pressure of 15 kPa diluted by N<sub>2</sub>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f2.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 3.</label>
<caption>
<p>Total pressure dependence of 2<italic>f</italic> wavelength modulation signal intensities (WMSI; •, 
<inline-graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686i1.gif"/>) and background noise (BGN; ○, 
<inline-graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686i2.gif"/>) for 1% CO<sub>2</sub> at 6,359.97 cm<sup>−1</sup> diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. Circles and lines indicate experimental and simulated results, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f3.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 4.</label>
<caption>
<p>Total pressure dependence of S/N for 1% CO<sub>2</sub> at 6,359.97 cm<sup>−1</sup> diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. Closed and open squares indicate experimental and simulated results, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f4.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f5-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 5.</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental (solid line) and simulated (dashed line) 2<italic>f</italic> wavelength modulation spectra of 1% N<sub>2</sub>O at around 6,591.44 cm<sup>−1</sup> and a total pressure of 6 kPa diluted by N<sub>2</sub>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f5.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f6-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 6.</label>
<caption>
<p>Total pressure dependence of 2<italic>f</italic> wavelength modulation signal intensities (WMSI; •, 
<inline-graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686i1.gif"/>) and back ground noise (BGN; ○, 
<inline-graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686i2.gif"/>) for 1% N<sub>2</sub>O at 6,591.44 cm<sup>−1</sup> diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. Circles and lines indicate experimental and simulated results, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f6.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f7-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 7.</label>
<caption>
<p>Total pressure dependence of S/N for 1% N<sub>2</sub>O at 6,591.44 cm<sup>−1</sup> diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. Closed and open squares indicate experimental and simulated results, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f7.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f8-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 8.</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental (solid line) and simulated (dashed line) 2<italic>f</italic> wavelength modulation spectra of 0.01% CH<sub>4</sub> at around 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup> and a total pressure of 15 kPa diluted by N<sub>2</sub>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f8.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f9-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 9.</label>
<caption>
<p>Total pressure dependence of 2<italic>f</italic> wavelength modulation signal intensities (WMSI; •, 
<inline-graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686i1.gif"/>) and background noise (BGN; ○, 
<inline-graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686i2.gif"/>) for 0.01% CH<sub>4</sub> at 6,046.95 cm<sup>−1</sup> diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. Circles and lines indicate experimental and simulated results, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f9.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f10-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Figure 10.</label>
<caption>
<p>Total pressure dependence of S/N for 0.01% CH<sub>4</sub> at 6,046.97 cm<sup>−1</sup> diluted by N<sub>2</sub>. Closed and open squares indicate experimental and simulated results, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="sensors-10-04686f10.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Table 1.</label>
<caption>
<p>Parameters used in the spectral simulation.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold>Laser</bold></th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold>Target</bold></th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold><italic>ω</italic><sub>0</sub><italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1-sensors-10-04686"><sup>a</sup></xref></italic></bold></th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold><italic>Γ</italic><sub>Doppler</sub><italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn1-sensors-10-04686"><sup>a</sup></xref></italic></bold></th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold><italic>Γ</italic><sub>air</sub><italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2-sensors-10-04686"><sup>b</sup></xref></italic></bold></th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold><italic>Γ</italic><sub>self</sub><italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn2-sensors-10-04686"><sup>b</sup></xref></italic></bold></th>
<th align="left" valign="bottom"><bold><italic>M</italic>/<italic>ω</italic><sub>m</sub><italic>β</italic><italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn3-sensors-10-04686"><sup>c</sup></xref></italic></bold></th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CO<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">6,359.967</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.00593</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.0734</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.1009</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.423</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">N<sub>2</sub>O</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">6,591.437</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.00614</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.0774</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.1009</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.305</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">CH<sub>4</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">6,046.953</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.00933</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.0627</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.0820</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.288</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-sensors-10-04686">
<label><italic>a</italic></label>
<p>In units of cm<sup>−1</sup>.</p></fn><fn id="tfn2-sensors-10-04686">
<label><italic>b</italic></label>
<p>In units of cm<sup>−1</sup>/atm.</p></fn><fn id="tfn3-sensors-10-04686">
<label><italic>c</italic></label>
<p>In units of 1/cm<sup>−1</sup>.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t2-sensors-10-04686" position="float">
<label>Table 2.</label>
<caption>
<p>Absorption lines of R(3) of the CH<sub>4</sub> 2ν<sub>3</sub> band at around 6,046.97 cm<sup>−1</sup>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Line</bold></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Position (cm<sup>−1</sup>)</bold></th>
<th align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Integrated absorption cross-section (cm<sup>2</sup> molecule<sup>−1</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>)</bold></th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6,046.942</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">8.17 × 10<sup>−22</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6,046.953</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.00 × 10<sup>−21</sup></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6,046.965</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.32 × 10<sup>−21</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
