Next Article in Journal
454 Pyrosequencing Analysis of Fungal Assemblages from Geographically Distant, Disparate Soils Reveals Spatial Patterning and a Core Mycobiome
Next Article in Special Issue
A Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Marker Comparison of a Large In- and Ex-situ Potato Landrace Cultivar Collection from Peru Reaffirms the Complementary Nature of both Conservation Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
High Genetic Diversity in Geographically Remote Populations of Endemic and Widespread Coral Reef Angelfishes (genus: Centropyge)
Diversity 2013, 5(1), 51-72; doi:10.3390/d5010051
Article

Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics

1,* , 2
, 3
 and 4
Received: 30 November 2012; in revised form: 18 January 2013 / Accepted: 1 February 2013 / Published: 18 February 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Diversity and Molecular Evolution)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1764 KB, uploaded 18 February 2013]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: The predominant analytical approach to associate landscape patterns with gene flow processes is based on the association of cost distances with genetic distances between individuals. Mantel and partial Mantel tests have been the dominant statistical tools used to correlate cost distances and genetic distances in landscape genetics. However, the inherent high correlation among alternative resistance models results in a high risk of spurious correlations using simple Mantel tests. Several refinements, including causal modeling, have been developed to reduce the risk of affirming spurious correlations and to assist model selection. However, the evaluation of these approaches has been incomplete in several respects. To demonstrate the general reliability of the causal modeling approach with Mantel tests, it must be shown to be able to correctly identify a wide range of landscape resistance models as the correct drivers relative to alternative hypotheses. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of the originally published causal modeling framework to support the correct model and reject alternative hypotheses of isolation by distance and isolation by barriers and to (2) evaluate the effectiveness of causal modeling involving direct competition of all hypotheses to support the correct model and reject all alternative landscape resistance models. We found that partial Mantel tests have very low Type II error rates, but elevated Type I error rates. This leads to frequent identification of support for spurious correlations between alternative resistance hypotheses and genetic distance, independent of the true resistance model. The frequency in which this occurs is directly related to the degree of correlation between true and alternative resistance models. We propose an improvement based on the relative support of the causal modeling diagnostic tests.
Keywords: landscape genetics; mantel test; causal modeling; simulation; CDPOP landscape genetics; mantel test; causal modeling; simulation; CDPOP
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Cushman, S.A.; Wasserman, T.N.; Landguth, E.L.; Shirk, A.J. Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics. Diversity 2013, 5, 51-72.

AMA Style

Cushman SA, Wasserman TN, Landguth EL, Shirk AJ. Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics. Diversity. 2013; 5(1):51-72.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cushman, Samuel A.; Wasserman, Tzeidle N.; Landguth, Erin L.; Shirk, Andrew J. 2013. "Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics." Diversity 5, no. 1: 51-72.


Diversity EISSN 1424-2818 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert