Next Article in Journal
Chromosome 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Molecular Genetics in the Context of Multidisciplinary Clinical Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Melatonin Treatment Maintains the Quality of Fresh-Cut Gastrodia elata under Low-Temperature Conditions by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species Metabolism and Phenylpropanoid Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy of a Multicomponent Nutraceutical Formulation for the Prevention and Treatment of Urinary Tract Stones
Previous Article in Special Issue
Time-Series Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanism of Ethylene Reducing Cold Sensitivity of Postharvest ‘Huangguan’ Pear
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Novel Active Layer-by-Layer Edible Coating on the Qualitative and Biochemical Traits of Minimally Processed ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ Apple Fruit

1
Department of Environmental, Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (DiSTABiF), University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
2
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Center for Olive, Fruits and Citrus Crops, 81100 Caserta, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 8315; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098315
Submission received: 29 March 2023 / Revised: 26 April 2023 / Accepted: 27 April 2023 / Published: 5 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Postharvest Biology and Molecular Research of Fruits)

Abstract

:
The color changes brought on by the enzymatic interactions of phenolic compounds with released endogenous polyphenol oxidase and the penetration of oxygen into the tissue has a significant impact on the commercialization of fresh-cut fruit, such as apples. This process causes a loss of quality in fresh-cut apples, resulting in browning of the fruit surface. By acting as a semipermeable barrier to gases and water vapor and thus lowering respiration, enzymatic browning, and water loss, edible coatings can provide a chance to increase the shelf life of fresh-cut produce. In this study, the effect of edible coatings composed of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC, 1%), sodium alginate (SA, 1%), citric acid (CA, 1%), and oxalic acid (OA, 0.5%) on fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple was studied. Four formulations of edible coatings, A. SA+CMC, B. SA+CMC+CA, C. SA+CMC+OA, and D. SA+CMC+CA+OA, were tested. Fresh-cut apples were dipped into different solutions and then stored at 4 °C, and physicochemical and biochemical analyses were performed at 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of storage. Results demonstrated that all four combinations improved the shelf-life of fresh-cut apple by slowing down the qualitative postharvest decay, total soluble solid, and titratable acidity. The browning index was highest in the control samples (82%), followed by CMC+SA (53%), CMC+SA+CA (32%), CMC+SA+OA (22%), and finally CMC+SA+CA+OA (7%) after 12 days of cold storage. Furthermore, coating application increased the bioactive compound content and antioxidant enzyme activities. Furthermore, the synergistic activity of SA+CMC+CA+OA reduces enzymatic browning, prolonging the postharvest life of minimally processed ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apples.

1. Introduction

Apples are a valuable source of micronutrients, including vitamins, zinc, and iron, as well as phytonutrients, such as anthocyanins, flavanols, and flavonols, which have antioxidant activity [1]. By scavenging and eradicating cellular free radicals, these components in apples assist in controlling immunological responses and defending against chronic illnesses [2]. A substitute for the provision of fresh-like, extremely nutrient-dense, practical, and healthy commodities is minimal processing. Ready-to-eat apples have recently gained popularity for their convenience, portability, and ease of access and they satisfy your need for a healthy snack [3]. The safety and attractiveness of fresh-cut fruit may be compromised by mechanical bruising that occurs during processing and handling, which also causes an increase in respiration rates and several biochemical responses that underpin microbiological decomposition and quality decline [4]. The principal problem affecting the quality of fresh-cut apples is generally acknowledged to be enzymatic browning [5]. The enzymatic conversion of endogenous phenols to quinones by polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in the presence of oxygen is commonly acknowledged as the cause of the browning of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables [6,7].
Edible coatings and films are widely used to prolong the quality shelf life of many horticultural products [8,9]. The edible films and coatings function as semipermeable membranes that limit the flow of gases and water vapor, which is useful in slowing down the rate of respiration and water loss from the fruit and can subsequently slow the rate of physiological postharvest deterioration [10]. A variety of structural ingredients, including proteins, lipids, and polysaccharides such as cellulose, chitosan, starch, and pectin, can be used in the coating formulation due to the diversification of edible coating manufacture [11,12]. The building elements of the edible coatings are classified into hydrocolloids (proteins and polysaccharides), lipids, and composites [13]. Layer-by-layer (LbL) electrostatic self-assembly coating is a promising technology adopted to prolong the shelf-life of whole and fresh-cut fruits [14].
Sodium alginate (SA; E401) is defined as a “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) ingredient used in the food industry as an emulsifier, stabilizer, thickener, and gelling agent; it has a low price and great advantages. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC; E466) is a water-soluble polysaccharide with suitable biodegradable and edible film-forming properties that can be generated in big quantities and at low cost from a variety of sources [15]. Several studies evaluated the efficacy of hydrocolloids composed of carboxymethylcellulose or sodium alginate for the formulation of mono- and bi-layer coatings, which can increase the postharvest life of citrus [16], pistachio kernels [17], mango [18], ‘Kinnow’ mandarin [19], pear [20], strawberries [21], and walnut kernel [22]. Despite the fact that some studies have reported the antioxidant properties of films or coatings obtained by SA-CMC, little is known about their effect on food [23,24]. An edible coating realized by SA-CMC with Brewer Yeast has been used to prevent a qualitative decay and significantly increase the shelf life of grapes [25].
Edible coatings combined with organic acids represent a valid tool to preserve the quality and extend the storability of fresh product [26]. Oxalic acid (OA) is a naturally occurring substance that has a variety of physiological effects on plant tissues. Several studies showed that oxalic acid was involved in controlling tissue enzyme browning, inducing systemic resistance, retarding fruit ripening, suppressing the lipid peroxidation, and controlling qualitative decay [27,28,29,30].
Citric acid plays an important role in physiological and metabolic respiratory pathways [31]; furthermore, its copper chelating action inhibits the activity of polyphenol oxidase [32]. It has been reported that citric acid can prevent browning and extend the shelf life of several fruit crops [31,33,34].
However, fresh-cut apples are highly perishable, and several studies have been conducted to improve the postharvest life of minimally processed apple fruits using the following methods: alginate and gellan-based edible coatings [35], photodynamic bacteria inactivation with quercetin/pectine edible coating [36], corn zein-based water-soluble coating formulation impregnated with nisin [37], whey protein isolate/high methoxyl pectin-based carvacrol emulsions [38], and probiotic film based on gellan gum, cranberry extract, and Lactococcus lactis [39].
Currently, no other studies have been conducted on the synergistic effect of carboxymethyl cellulose and sodium alginate combined with oxalic and citric acid on the preservation of ready-to-eat apple or other fruit crops. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of different layer-by-layer edible coatings on the quality and biochemical characteristics of minimally processed ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apples during 12 days of cold storage.

2. Results and Discussions

2.1. Physicochemical Traits

Fresh-cut fruits and vegetables respond quickly to wounding stress, producing large amounts of ethylene and a rising respiratory rate, with loss of firmness and rapid qualitative decay [40]. In Table 1, the physicochemical parameters of coated and uncoated apple slices at 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage are reported. Weight loss is a key factor that influences the quality and storage life of fruits [41]. The weight loss significantly increased during storage in all samples (p ≤ 0.05), but tested coatings helped to reduce the moisture transfer from the fresh-cut fruit to the surrounding environment. CMC and SA-based treatment, alone or in conjunction with CA and AO, on fresh-cut apple fruits showed a reduction in the weight loss compared to control samples, demonstrating a synergistic effect of different compounds in the tested coatings (Table 1). Both CMC+SA+AO- and CMC+SA+CA+AO-coated apple slices showed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower weight loss compared to other samples at the end of storage (Table 1). Several studies have demonstrated that edible coatings produce a barrier layer on the fruit cutting surface, reducing the moisture transfer responsible for shrinkage, water loss, and decay [42,43]. In particular, in fresh-cut apples, the weight loss can be reduced by applying a bilayer probiotic edible coating containing carboxymethyl cellulose, zein, and Lactobacillus plantarum 299v [44] and an active coating composed of aloe vera gel or alginate and calcium lactate with ferulic acid [45].
The important commercial indicators of fruit quality are sugar content and acidity, which are related to fruit ripening and influence the organoleptic quality [46]. TSS increased throughout storage in all samples with a significant difference among coated and control fruits. CMC+SA+CA+AO-coated apple showed the lowest values (11.9 ± 0.06) at day 12 (Table 1), demonstrating the effectiveness of this coating in slowing down the moisture loss and fruit ripening with the breakdown of starch to sugar. Manzoor et al. [41] reported that the TSS of fresh-cut kiwifruit coated with alginate, carboxymethylcellulose, ascorbic acid, and vanillin was low compared to the control sample. Other authors also suggested that the TSS of the coated apple samples was stable during the 7 days of storage [44,45].
During storage, the changes in apple acidity affect the sugar/acid ratio responsible for apple flavor. At the end of storage, the lowest significant TA value was observed in the control sample, while it was higher for CMC+SA+AO and CMC+SA+CA+AO (Table 1).
The decrease in TA content observed in the control sample is due to a higher respiration rate that caused the oxidation of organic acids and their decreases over time [47].
A significant increase in the pH value was detected in all samples with a lower value in the control compared to coated samples throughout storage (Table 1). Other studies reported that no significant change in the pH value has been observed in apple slices coated with bilayer probiotic, with pectin combined to essential oil and with a combination of ferulic acid with aloe vera gel or alginate during cold storage [44,45,48].

2.2. Secondary Metabolite Content

Phenolic compounds are found in abundance in higher plants. In response to damage stress, plants rapidly produce more phenols, which triggers an injury defense response for wound healing and repair. Processing procedures, including peeling, coring, cutting, and slicing, cause serious mechanical damage to fresh-cut fruits and vegetables, triggering the production of phenolic compounds to be activated [49]. In our study, total phenols (POL) were enhanced by LbL coating application, with or without antibrowning agents (Figure 1a). However, the POL of CMC+SA+OA+CA samples was higher than that of all other samples, with values of 213.17 ± 10.97, 249.19 ± 0.81, and 272.96 ± 2.79 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW at 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage (Figure 1a). Compared with the control sample, CMC+SA+OA apples revealed an increase of about 25, 82, and 120% at three times analyzed, respectively (Figure 1a). On the contrary, the CMC+SA and CMC+SA+CA samples showed significantly higher values than the control, with a stable trend up to 8 days of cold storage, reaching maximum values of 193.63 ± 5.02 and 181.65 ± 4.76 mg GAE 100 g−1 FW, respectively, at the end of storage (Figure 1a).
Flavonoid (FLA) production increased in all treated samples, while it decreased in the control sample (Figure 1b). FLA, during the 12 days of storage at 4 °C, in the control sample decreased from 60.24 ± 1.99 to 47.87 ± 4.23 mg CA 100 g−1 FW. In the coated samples, the values increased from 71.32 ± 1.30 to 81.27 ± 2.40 mg CA 100 g−1 FW in the CMC+SA treatment, from 70.20 ± 1.67 to 80.38 ± 1.93 mg CA 100 g−1 FW in the CMC+SA+CA samples, and from 75.05 ± 2.66 to 87.52 ± 1.36 mg CA 100 g−1 FW in the CMC+SA+OA apples at the end of storage (Figure 1b). As with POL, FLA showed the highest value in the CMC+SA+OA+CA samples with values of 103.64 ± 2.79, 113.35 ± 3.69, and 126.27 ± 4.21 mg CA 100 g−1 FW at 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 1b).
Anthocyanins are water-soluble pigments that give fruits, flowers, and leaves a variety of appealing colors. In our study, anthocyanin content (ANT) decreased in the control samples, with a minimum of 2.14 ± 0.57 at 12 days of cold storage (Figure 1c). The CMC+SA sample showed a 2-fold higher value (4.52 ± 0.47 mg C3G 100 g−1 FW) than the control sample at the end of cold storage, while in the CMC+SA+CA apple, ANT, after an increase recorded at 4 days cold storage (2.96 ± 0.04 mg C3G 100 g−1 FW), decreased to 2.74 ± 0.19 at the end of the storage period (Figure 1c). However, the ANT of the CMC+SA+OA and CMC+SA+OA+CA samples was higher than all that of the other samples, with values of 3.89 ± 0.47 and 5.17 ± 0.15 mg C3G 100 g−1 FW for the first timing, 5.80 ± 1.05 and 7.98 ± 0.14 mg C3G 100 g−1 FW for the second timing, and 7.24 ± 0.38 and 10.15 ± 0.02 C3G 100 g−1 FW for the last timing (Figure 1c).
Figure 1. Total phenols (a), flavonoids (b), anthocyanins (c), ascorbic acid (d), DPPH (e), FRAP (f), and ABTS (g) in the control (C) and treated samples with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 1. Total phenols (a), flavonoids (b), anthocyanins (c), ascorbic acid (d), DPPH (e), FRAP (f), and ABTS (g) in the control (C) and treated samples with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Ijms 24 08315 g001
Fruit are well-known sources of bioactive compounds, with antioxidant properties conferring a lot of beneficial effects for human health [50]. The main phenolic substances found in fruit are phenolic acid, monophenol, flavonoids, and hydroxyl cinnamic acid derivatives. Additionally, flavonoids also comprise anthocyanins, flavonols, and isoflavones [40]. Several studies have demonstrated an increase in phenolic compound content in coated fresh-cut fruits due to the phenylalanine ammonia lyase activation, which is the first step in phenylpropanoid metabolism, after cutting [40,45,51]. Phenol synthesis is considered a defense mechanism activated against wounding and the levels of these compounds are the result of a balance between their biosynthesis and utilization rate [52,53]. An increase in phenolic substances in fresh-cut fruit can improve the functional value of these products [40].
Fruit growth, postharvest storage, and stress tolerance are all regulated by ascorbic acid, which also impacts fruit ripening [50]. In the present study, ascorbic acid content (AA) decreased in the control sample, with a minimum of 12.16 ± 0.21 mg AA 100 g−1 FW after 12 days of storage and a maximum of 14.59 ± 0.07 mg AA 100 g−1 FW after 4 days of storage (Figure 1d). In all treated samples, there is an increase in ascorbic acid. Samples coated with CMC+SA, CMC+SA+CA, and CMC+SA+OA showed an increase of 32, 24, and 18% after 4 days, 63, 50, and 43% after 8 days, and 73, 53, and 60% at the end of cold storage, respectively (Figure 1d). The sample coated with the CMC+SA+OA+CA complex coating showed an increase of 36, 92, and 166% in the three times considered compared to the control samples at the same times (Figure 1d). The ascorbic acid content reported herein (~17 mg/100 g DW at T0) is similar to values previously reported for the ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple [54]. The change in ascorbic acid content could be due to the activation of some genes involved in its recycling process following mechanical wounding [55]. In addition to its role as an antioxidant, ascorbic acid also has an important dietary value [56]. The increase in ascorbic acid content in coated fresh-cut apple could be due to the low oxygen permeability of the several coatings, which lowered the activity of the enzymes and prevented the oxidation of ascorbic acid combined with reduced water loss [57].
Total fruit antioxidant capability can be assessed using a range of techniques that can consider the various processes [57]. The total antioxidant capacity of coated and uncoated ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apples was evaluated by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazine (DPPH) radical, ABTS•+ radical cation, and Fe(III) reducing efficacy (FRAP). In general, the application of LBL coatings significantly improved the antioxidant activity of fresh-cut apples (Figure 1e–g). In particular, the lowest antioxidant activity using the DPPH method was recorded in the control samples, with values of 4.20 ± 0.04, 3.86 ± 0.13, and 3.16 ± 0.05 µmol TE g−1 FW at 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 1e). Compared to the control, the CMC+SA apples showed an increase in antioxidant activity of approximately 25, 32, and 100% at the three timings of storage (Figure 1e). A less pronounced, but still significant, percentage increase in the DPPH assay was also recorded in the CMC+SA+CA and CMC+SA+OA samples with values of about 16 and 23% after 4 days, 24 and 33% after 8 days, and 61 and 70% after 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 1e). In the case of the CMC+SA+OA+CA samples, the DPPH values ranged from 5.94 ± 0.04 to 8.17 ± 0.03 µmol TE g−1 FW at the end of storage (Figure 1e). FRAP increased in all treated samples (Figure 1f). In the control samples, the FRAP value reached a minimum of 3.55 ± 0.02 µmol TE g−1 FW at 4 days and a maximum of 4.63 ± 0.04 µmol TE g−1 FW at 8 days of cold storage. FRAP showed a similar trend in the CMC+SA, CMC+SA+CA, and CMC+SA+OA samples, with statistically significant increases of approximately 37, 29, and 39% after 4 days cold storage, 10, 5 and 23% after 8 days, and 15, 19, and 30% at the end of cold storage compared to control samples (Figure 1f). The samples coated with the complex coating (CMC+SA+OA+CA) exhibited the highest FRAP value with a percentage increase of 41, 42, and 85% compared to the values found in the control samples at 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 1f). ABTS radical scavenging activity was higher in the coated apple slices compared to the control (Figure 1g). In our study, ABTS increased in the control samples, with a minimum of 1.92 ± 0.04 µmol TE g−1 FW at 4 days of cold storage and a maximum of 3.11 ± 0.05 µmol TE g−1 FW after 12 days (Figure 1f). The samples coated with CMC+SA showed the lowest variation from the control, although still statistically significant, with percentages of 51, 15, and 25% compared to the control in the three timings of storage, respectively (Figure 1f). A significant increment of ABTS was also recorded in the CMC+SA+CA and CMC+SA+OA samples, with values higher than the control of 57 and 74% after 4 days, 27 and 53% after 8 days, and 36 and 47% after 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 1f). However, the ABTS of the CMC+SA+OA+CA samples was 2-fold higher (4.16 ± 0.11, 4.48 ± 0.02, and 5.53 ± 0.08 µmol TE g−1 FW) than that of the control samples throughout storage (Figure 1f).
In fresh-cut fruits, phenolic compounds and ascorbic acid have key roles in antioxidant activity [40]. The fresh-cut processing operation contributes to the increase in phenolic content and, consequently, antioxidant capacity of these products, as demonstrated in several fresh-cut fruits such as carrot, onion, potato, and dragon fruit [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. The edible coatings retained the phenolic content during storage as well as improving antioxidant activity and slowing down qualitative decay [42]. Nicolau-Lapena et al. [45] demonstrated that ferulic acid with Aloe vera gel or alginate coating was effective in maintaining a high antioxidant content with an increase in the AOX by DPPH and FRAP values during storage in fresh-cut apple.

2.3. Antioxidant Enzymes

The wounding process also activate defense gene transcription in plant cells as well as an antioxidant defense system that includes several enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and all enzymes involved in the glutathione–ascorbate cycle, that scavenge reactive oxygen free radicals, involved in cell membrane damage due to lipid peroxidation [62]. As shown in Figure 2, the SOD and CAT activity increased significantly (p < 0.05) in all coated samples compared to the control sample. SOD activity showed the lowest values in the control samples (1.85 ± 0.05, 1.80 ± 0.07, and 2.28 ± 0.04 U g−1 FW) throughout storage (Figure 2a). SOD activity reached the maximum values of 3.33 ± 0.01 and 3.45 ± 0.02 U g−1 FW in the CMC+SA+OA- and CMC+SA+OA+CA-coated samples, respectively, at the end of the cold storage (Figure 2a). Lower values (2.37 ± 0.03 and 2.57 ± 0.03 U g−1 FW) were recorded in the CMC+SA- and CMC+SA+CA-coated samples after 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 2a).
Similarly, CAT activity was lower in the control samples, with values of 69.25 ± 0.94, 71.66 ± 1.24, and 74.83 ± 0.32 µmol g−1 FW as cold storage progressed (Figure 2b). CAT activity increased during cold storage in coated samples with the polysaccharidic bilayer (CMC+SA) and with the polysaccharidic bilayer combined by CA (TB), OA, and CA+OA, reaching the highest values of 94.58 ± 0.39 and 104.84 ± 2.35 µmol g−1 FW in the CMC+SA+OA- and CMC+SA+OA+CA-treated samples after 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 2b). ROS produced in the fruit cell can be scavenged, or processed, by highly efficient antioxidant systems [63]. The ROS-processing systems, important for fruit metabolism, involve different enzymes, such as SOD and CAT, needed to modulate ROS levels. Cutting styles can modify cellular homeostasis, leading to the increase in ROS production in the site or adjacent to wounded cells. In fresh-cut pitaya fruits, it has been observed that an increase in antioxidant enzyme activity can finely modulate ROS during cold storage [61] and methyl salicylate-based pretreatment on fresh-cut pitaya can accelerate the ROS response against cutting process and regulate ROS levels by activating antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, APX, and CAT [64]. Kou et al. [65] demonstrated that ‘Huang guan’ pears treated with chitosan, pullulan, and calcium coating maintained higher SOD and CAT activity than uncoated samples, although a reduction in SOD and CAT activity decline in the peel during seven months of cold storage was observed.
Figure 2. Superoxide dismutase (a) and catalase (b) activity of the control (C) and treated with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 2. Superoxide dismutase (a) and catalase (b) activity of the control (C) and treated with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Ijms 24 08315 g002
The AA-GSH pathway takes part in the scavenging of ROS, whereas AA and GSH not only directly remove a variety of ROS but also carry out several other activities to keep the cytosol and other cellular organelles in a favorable state to increase the antioxidant capacity and lessen oxidative stress, which is brought on by various abiotic stresses [66].
The first enzyme of the AA-GSH cycle is APX, which converts hydrogen peroxide into water and monodehydroascorbate (MDHA), with AA acting as an electron donor. In our study, APX increased in all samples. The enzyme’s activity was lower in the control and CMC+SA+CA-coated samples, followed by the CMC+SA-coated samples, in all timings considered (Figure 3a). APX activity was higher in the CMC+SA+OA and CMC+SA+OA+CA samples, with values of 0.43 ± 0.02 and 0.53 ± 0.01 µmol g−1 FW after 4 days, 0.55 ± 0.01 and 0.63 ± 0.02 µmol g−1 FW after 8 days, and 0.63 ± 0.02 and 0.76 ± 0.02 µmol g−1 FW after 12 days of storage (Figure 3a).
A part of MDHA is spontaneously converted into dehydroascorbate (DHA) and AA by monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR). MDHAR activity followed an increasing trend in all samples. In particular, slight statistically significant variations were recorded in the CMC+SA- and CMC+SA+CA-coated samples, whereas in the CMC+SA+OA and CMC+SA+OA+CA apple slices, the enzyme activity was 1.6- and 2-fold higher than in the control at the end of the cold storage (Figure 3b).
After this, DHA, by using GSH, produces GSSG through the action of dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR). DHAR enzyme activity increased in all samples during cold storage. The control samples showed the lowest activity with values of 1.37 ± 0.01, 1.51 ± 0.01, and 1.66 ± 0.02 µmol kg−1 FW in the three timings of storage (Figure 3c). As with other enzymes, the highest activity was detected in the case of DHAR in the CMC+SA+OA+CA- coated samples, with values of 1.94 ± 0.03, 2.32 ± 0.04, and 2.63 ± 0.08 µmol kg−1 FW at 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage (Figure 3c).
Ultimately, employing NADPH as the electron donor, this GSSG regenerates GSH by the action of gluthatione reductase (GR). All treated samples showed an increase in GR activity compared to the control samples. In particular, the CMC+SA and CMC+SA+CA samples revealed an increase in GR activity around 11, 14, and 18% after 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 3d). In CMC+SA+OA and CMC+SA+OA+CA apple slices, after 12 days of cold storage, there was an increase in enzyme activity of 31 and 42%, respectively (Figure 3d).
Similarly to our results, cellulose nanofibers increased the APX activity in fresh-cut ‘Red Fuji’ during 8 days of cold storage [67]. Carbossimethylcellulose with calcium chloride and liquid paraffin increased the activity of APX more than the control in pakchoi samples. The same increase was recorded for the other enzymes belonging to the AA-GSH cycle in treated pakchoi samples [68]. A coating composed of S-nitrosoglutathione-chitosan nanoparticles improved the MDHAR and DHAR activities in fresh-cut ‘Fuji’ apples throughout the whole storage time compared to control samples [69]. Similarly, Ackar et al. [70] demonstrated that a chitosan coating improved the AA-GSH cycle enzyme activities in fresh-cut Fuji apples more than the control samples.
Figure 3. Ascorbate peroxidase (a), monodehydroascorbate reductase (b), dehydroascorbate reductase (c), and glutathione reductase (d) activity of the control (C) and treated with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 3. Ascorbate peroxidase (a), monodehydroascorbate reductase (b), dehydroascorbate reductase (c), and glutathione reductase (d) activity of the control (C) and treated with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Ijms 24 08315 g003

2.4. Enzymatic Browning and Oxidative Damage

Enzymatic browning is a natural phenomenon that occurs widely in minimally processed fruits and vegetables because of the bruising, cutting, and peeling stages. Enzymatic browning is caused by polyphenoloxidase (PPO), which is found in most fruits, vegetables, and certain seafood. Together with PPO, the related oxidative enzyme guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) may also cause enzymatic browning in fruits and vegetables [71]. In our study, GPX activity showed a statistically significant exponential increase in the control samples, with a maximum value of 121.30 ± 7.74 nmol g−1 FW after 12 days of cold storage (Figure 4). A slight significant increase was observed in all coated samples, although lower than the control samples. CMC+SA- and CMC+SA+CA-coated apples displayed the highest GPX values of 90.38 ± 1.06 and 101.88 ± 1.04 nmol g−1 FW at the end of cold storage, respectively. The CMC+SA+OA and CMC+SA+OA+CA apple slices revealed the efficacy of treatment with the lowest values of GPX activity (88.31 ± 0.28 and 79.80 ± 2.08 nmol g−1 FW) at the end of storage (Figure 4). In our study, PPO activity was probably delayed by coating application (Figure 5). The highest activity was recorded in the control samples (3.65 ± 0.14 µmol g−1 FW), while the lowest activity was observed in the CMC+SA+OA- and CMC+SA+OA+CA-coated samples (0.88 ± 0.02 and 1.01 ± 0.05 µmol g−1 FW) at the end of storage (Figure 5b). CMC+SA- and CMC+SA+CA-coated apple exhibited a PPO activity 3.3- and 2.5-fold lower (1.09 ± 0.07 and 1.41 ± 0.03 µmol g−1 FW) than the control samples at the last recorded timing (Figure 5b). In the presence of oxygen molecules, PPO catalyzes two distinct reactions: the hydroxylation of monophenols in o-diphenols and the oxidation of o-diphenols to o-quinones [71]. In this study, the o-diphenol content followed the same trend as PPO activity (Figure 5c). In particular, the content of o-diphenols was higher in the control samples, with an increasing percentage of 88, 114, 204, and 224% compared to CMC+SA-, CMC+SA+CA-, CMC+SA+OA-, and CMC+SA+OA+CA-treated samples at 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 4 and Figure 6). The browning index (BI) was highest in the control samples, followed by CMC+SA and CMC+SA+CA, while the samples with a low browning index were CMC+SA+OA and CMC+SA+CA+OA (Table S1; Figure 4).
Fresh-cut apple browning has been directly linked to PPO, although it also depends on the chemical structure and quantity of polyphenols [45]. In this study, coating application alleviated enzymatic browning by reducing PPO and GPX activities. According to our results, coatings composed of Acacia senegal, xanthan, and karaya gums inactivated PPO and GPX activity in fresh-cut apples [72]. Nicolau-Lapena et al. [45] reported that coatings with Aloe vera and alginate-calcium lactate delayed the enzymatic browning caused by PPO in apple discs. Fresh-cut apple cv Taaptimjaan coated with Aloe vera at 75% concentration displayed the lowest PPO and GPX activities after 6 days of cold storage [5]. Chitosan and chitosan–stevia coatings reduced the PPO activity in fresh-cut ‘Amasya’ apple, shielding the fruit from exposure to oxygen [73]. Similarly, chitosan nanoparticles reduced PPO activity but did not influence GPX activity in fresh-cut ‘Gala’ [74]. Cellulose nanofibers decreased the enzymatic browning caused by PPO and GPX activity in fresh-cut ‘Red Fuji’ during the cold storage [67].
LOX can have a positive or negative function in the response of the fruit to physical injury, depending on whether it is involved in autocatalytic peroxidation processes or as a signaling molecule that activates cellular defense [75,76]. Hydroperoxides produced by the action of LOX can cause tissue damage by inhibiting protein synthesis and altering cell membranes. Our results showed that the treatments significantly reduced the LOX activity (Figure 5d). Coating treatment influenced the LOX activity, which was 2-fold higher in the control samples compared to the CMC+SA+OA+CA apple slices at the end of cold storage (Figure 5d). The other treatments also improved the fruit’s resistance to lipoxidation; LOX activity in the control samples was 1.4-, 1.2-, and 1.7-fold higher than in the CMC+SA, CMC+SA+CA, CMC+SA+OA samples after 12 days of cold storage, respectively (Figure 5d). In line with our results, Wang et al. [67] reported that the coating formed by cellulose nanofibers improved the storability of ‘Red Fuji’ apples, inhibiting the LOX activity during cold storage. Moreover, arabic gum coating and γ-aminobutyric acid treatments (alone or in combination) significantly reduced LOX activity in Kinnow mandarins after 60 days of cold storage [19].
Figure 4. Browning surface in CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5.
Figure 4. Browning surface in CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5.
Ijms 24 08315 g004
Figure 5. Guaiacol peroxidase (a), polyphenoloxidase (b), ortho-diphenols (c), lipoxygenase (d) and malondialdehyde (e) in control (C) and treated samples with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 5. Guaiacol peroxidase (a), polyphenoloxidase (b), ortho-diphenols (c), lipoxygenase (d) and malondialdehyde (e) in control (C) and treated samples with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0, 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Ijms 24 08315 g005
Cellular membrane lipid peroxidation is triggered by cold and stress, with MDA as a byproduct. MDA production is considered an ROS-induced biomarker during cold storage [77]. The MDA content was higher in the control samples than in the treated samples after 4, 8, and 12 days of cold storage. After 12 days of storage, the highest MDA content (30.45 ± 0.35 nmol g−1) was recorded in control samples, followed by CMC+SA and CMC+SA+CA-treated apples (20.83 ± 0.56 and 20.75 ± 0.62 nmol g−1), while the lowest MDA content was recorded in the CMC+SA+OA- and CMC+SA+OA+CA-treated samples (13.29 ± 0.58 and 10.24 ± 0.13 nmol g−1) (Figure 5e). The application of coating minimizes the generation of MDA by suppressing the accumulation of ROS by enhancing the accumulation of antioxidants in different fruit crops, such as apricot [78], persimmon [79], and sweet cherries [80]. Furthermore, cellulose nanofibril application reduced the MDA content in the treated apples by 1.34 times compared to control groups [67]. The chitosan coating, with or without heat treatment, retarded the increase in MDA content and maintained lower levels than control throughout storage time in ‘Gala’ treated samples [81]. Xin et al. [82] demonstrated that whey protein with TGase and sunflower oil film led to a reduction in MDA concentration by about 22% compared to uncoated apples.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A large multivariate dataset’s dimensionality might be reduced due to the principal component analysis (PCA). All the variance in the examined variables is explained by the identification of the principal components (PCs) (Figure 6). The first two principal components accounted for 88.48% of the variation (50.01 and 38.47% for PC1 and PC2, respectively) in treated and untreated minimally processed apple slices (Figure 6). CAT (r2 = 0.955), APX (r2 = 0.961), MDHAR (r2 = 0.959), DHAR (r2 = 0.981), GR (r2 = 0.964), POL (r2 = 0.764), DPPH (r2 = 0.816), ANT (r2 = 0.908), AA (r2 = 0.784), FLA (r2 = 0.845), FRAP (r2 = 0.954), and ABTS (r2 = 0.960) were positively correlated with PC1. In contrast, pH (r2 = 0.788), TSS (r2 = 0.972), WL (r2 = 0.943), MDA (r2 = 0.944), PPO (r2 = 0.925), LOX (r2 = 0.922), and o-DiPh (r2 = 0.925) were positively correlated with PC2, while TA (r2 = −0.855) negatively to one.
Figure 6. Principal component analysis on qualitative and biochemical traits in control (C, blue) and treated samples with CMC+SA (TA, green), CMC+SA+CA (TB, red), CMC+SA+AO (TC, yellow), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD, violet) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0 (T0), 4 (T1), 8 (T2), and 12 days (T3) of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5.
Figure 6. Principal component analysis on qualitative and biochemical traits in control (C, blue) and treated samples with CMC+SA (TA, green), CMC+SA+CA (TB, red), CMC+SA+AO (TC, yellow), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD, violet) in fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0 (T0), 4 (T1), 8 (T2), and 12 days (T3) of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5.
Ijms 24 08315 g006
The Pearson coefficient was used to conduct a correlation-based analysis, which revealed substantial negative (in red) and positive (in blue) connections between all examined attributes (Figure 7). The fruit’s TSS increases as it ripens and becomes sweeter and less acidic. The main elements used to assess the quality of food are pH, titratable acidity, and soluble solid levels [83]. In our study, pH showed a positive correlation with TSS (r = 0.768; p ≤ 0.01) and a negative connection with TA (r = −0.560; p ≤ 0.01). Pre-preparations, such as peeling, chopping, and slicing, cause serious mechanical damage to fresh-cut fruits and vegetables. These processing procedures improve the secondary metabolite production [40]. In this study, all the secondary metabolism components examined had positive correlations with one another: POL with FLA (r = 0.942; p ≤ 0.01), AA (r = 0.890; p ≤ 0.01), and ANT (r = 0.824; p ≤ 0.01) and subsequently with DPPH (r = 0.836; p ≤ 0.01), FRAP (r = 0.751; p ≤ 0.01), and ABTS (r = 0.720; p ≤ 0.01). Physiological conditions determine a low ROS generation in plant tissue. Wounding stress can compromise cellular homeostasis, increase respiration, and activate other ROS sources such as amine oxidases and NADPH oxidases, increasing ROS production around the injured cells [61]. In these cases, all antioxidant enzymes are activated. In our study, all antioxidant enzymes are positively correlated with each other: CAT with SOD (r = 0.923; p ≤ 0.01), APX (r = 0.945; p ≤ 0.01), MDHAR (r = 0.893; p ≤ 0.01), DHAR (r = 0.946; p ≤ 0.01), and GR (r = 0.943; p ≤ 0.01). The imbalance in ROS metabolism led to overactive lipoxygenase and the consequent accumulation of malondialdehyde, which contributes to oxidative damage to the cell membrane and affects storage quality. In addition, GPX- and PPO-induced enzymatic pathways can lead to the most damaging browning, which, in combination with lipid oxidation reactions, results in significant fruit loss [84]. In our study, we found a positive correlation between all the factors that determine fruit decay and browning. In fact, PPO showed a positive correlation between o-DiPh (r = 0.927; p ≤ 0.01) and MDA (r = 0.848; p ≤ 0.01) levels and GPX (r = 0.857; p ≤ 0.01) and LOX (r = 0.824; p ≤ 0.01) activities.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Fruit Sample and Experimental Design

‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apples were hand-harvested on 25th September in an experimental orchard located in Pignataro Maggiore (Caserta, Italy) at the CREA—Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops (41°04′ N. 14°19′ E with an altitude of 61 m above sea) and were transported to the laboratory, screened for uniformity, appearance, and the absence of physical defects or decay. Fruits were placed in ‘melaio’ to redden for 20 days. The whole fruits were sanitized with sodium hypochlorite (1% v/v) and sterile water and sliced. Four solutions of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) 1% w/v, sodium alginate (SA) 1% w/v, oxalic acid (OA) 0.5% w/v, and citric acid (CA) 1% w/v were prepared.
The apple slices were divided into five lots. The control lot was immersed in sterile water for 2 min, interspersed with 1 min of air drying. The second lot (TA) consisted of dipping, as for the control lot, in CMC and SA, the third lot (TB) in CMC, SA, and CA, the fourth lot (TC) in CMC, SA, and OA, and the fifth lot (TD) in all four solutions. The choice of all concentrations was determined by preliminary tests. At the end of coating application, the samples (n = 60, about 250 g each) were dried for 1 h at room temperature and stored in PET trays for ready-to-eat fruit at 4 ± 0.5 °C and 95% relative humidity. All analyses were carried out on three biological replicates at 0 (T0), 4 (T1), 8 (T2), and 12 (T3) days of cold storage, and three technical replicates were performed per biological replicate. Samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

3.2. Physicochemical Traits

For physicochemical analysis, the juice from the apple slices was obtained using a juice extractor (Hurom H-AA, Soul, Republic of Korea). The total soluble solid content (TSS) was assessed using a digital refractometer (Sinergica Soluzioni, DBR35, Pescara, Italy) and expressed as °Brix. Titratable acidity (TA) was carried out according to Magri et al. [85], by titrating 5 mL of diluted juice (1:5 v/v) with 0.1 mol L−1 NaOH and expressed as g of malic acid equivalent (MAE) per L of juice (g MAE L−1). The weight loss (WL) was established by calculating the difference between the initial weight from the final weight divided by initial weight at every sample timing, and the results were expressed as a percentage. The pH value was measured using a digital pH meter (Model 2001, Crison, Barcelona, Spain) at 25 °C. The slice colors were assessed using a Minolta colorimeter (CR5. Minolta Camera Co., Osaka, Japan) to determine chromaticity values L* (lightness), a* (green to red), and b* (blue to yellow). The browning index was calculated by converting the Hunter scale (Lab) values through the formula:
BI = 100 100 L 2 +   a 2 +   b 2
The results were expressed as the percentage of browning (%).

3.3. Secondary Metabolites

Slices of apple were homogenized (1:10 w/v) in a hydroalcoholic solution (methanol/water 80:20 v/v). The hydroalcoholic extract was used to determine the secondary metabolite content. The total phenolic content (TP) was evaluated through the Folin–Ciocâlteu method described by Magri et al. [85], with some modifications. The mixture assay contained 20 µL hydroalcoholic extract, 100 µL Folin’s reagent, and sodium carbonate 7.5% w/v. The results were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent per 100 g−1 of fresh weight (mg GAE per 100 g−1 FW). The flavonoid content (TF) was assessed as reported by Morra et al. [86]. The results were expressed as mg of catechin equivalent (CE) per 100 g−1 FW.
The ascorbic acid (AA) content was determined according to Malorni et al. [87], with some modifications. Apple fruits (1:5, w/v) were mixed with a solution of 16% v/v metaphosphoric acid and 0.18% w/v disodium ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (Na-EDTA). The homogenate was centrifuged at 11,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The assay mixture was developed using 400 μL of extract, 0.3% w/v metaphosphoric acid, and diluted Folin’s reagent (1:5, v/v). The results were expressed as mg ascorbic acid (AA) per g−1 FW.

3.4. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity based on the DPPH method was measured according to Cirillo et al. [88], with slight modification. The reaction mix included DPPH 63.4 µM and 80 µL of hydroalcoholic extract. The AOX was expressed as µmol Trolox equivalent (TE) g−1 of FW.
For the ABTS assay, the stock solutions consisted of 7.4 mM 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS•+) solution and 2.6 mM potassium persulfate solution. The working solution was then prepared by mixing the two stock solutions in equal quantities and allowing them to react for 12 h at room temperature in the dark. The solution was then diluted by mixing the ABTS•+ solution with phosphate-buffered saline 1X pH 8.0 to obtain an absorbance of about 0.8–0.9 units at 730 nm. The results were expressed as µmol TE g−1 of FW.
For the reducing power assay (FRAP), 100 µL of methanolic extract was mixed with a NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer 0.2 M, pH 6.0. Samples were incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. After this step, trichloroacetic acid solution 10% was added in the tubes, and they were placed on a shaker plate for 10 min. Subsequently, a sample of the reaction mixture was homogenated with ferric chloride 0.1%. The sample’s absorbance was monitored at 720 nm. The results were expressed as µmol TE g−1 of FW.

3.5. Extraction for Enzymatic Activities

The TE crude extract was achieved by homogenizing tissue powder (1:3; w/v) with an extraction buffer containing 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 1 mM sodium EDTA (pH 7), 6.25 mM polyethylene glycol (PEG), 5% (w/w) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP), and 5 mM ascorbic acid, only for the APX enzyme extraction. The activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), and glutathione oxidoreductase (GR) were screened with this crude extract.
The TPPO crude extract was obtained by mixing apple powder (1:1.5 w/v) with 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.4 containing 2% (w/v) of PVPP.
The TLOX was realized by blending frozen apple tissue (1:3 w/v) with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.8, 1 mM sodium–EDTA pH 7.0, and 2% (w/v) of PVPP.
The protein content in all crude enzyme extracts examined was evaluated using the Bradford assay [89].

3.5.1. Catalase and Superoxide Dismutase Activity

CAT (EC 1.11.1.6) activity was estimated as described by Magri and Petriccione, 2022 [90], with slight modifications. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 27 mM H2O2, and 100 μL of crude enzyme extract. The reaction was checked at 240 nm, and catalase activity was expressed as μmol of H2O2 per g FW.
SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) was assessed as reported by Magri et al. [91], with some modifications. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.8, 1.0 mM Na-EDTA pH 7.0, 13 mM methionine, 75 μM nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT), 0.5 μM riboflavin, and 100 μL of proteic extract. The absorbance was registered at 560 nm and expressed as U g−1 FW.

3.5.2. Ascorbate–Glutathione Pathway

All analysis was carried out as reported by Magri et al. [91], with slight modifications. APX (EC 1.11.1.11) activity was assayed using 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 0.33 mM ascorbic acid, 0.42 mM H2O2, 0.66 mM Na-EDTA pH 7.0, and 100 µL of crude enzyme extract. The reaction was monitored at 290 nm, and the enzyme activity was expressed as µmol of ascorbate g−1 of FW.
MDHAR (EC 1.6.5.4) activity was executed using of 50 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride pH of 7.6 (Tris-HCl), 2.5 mM sodium ascorbate, 0.1 mM reduced disodium salt hydrate (NADH), 0.25 U ascorbate oxidase, and 50 µL of crude enzyme extract. The absorbance was registered at 340 nm and expressed in mol kg−1 FW.
DHAR (EC 1.8.5.1) activity was assessed by combining 50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.0, 0.1 mM sodium EDTA pH 8.0, 2.5 mM reduced glutathione, 0.2 mM dehydroascorbate, and 50 µL of crude enzyme extract. The reaction was started by adding dehydroascorbate, and the increase in ascorbate was recorded at 265 nm. The results were expressed as mol kg−1 FW.
GR (EC 1.6.4.2) activity was carried out mixing 50 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.0, 0.5 mM glutathione disulfide (GSSG), 50 µL of crude enzyme extract, and 0.2 mM dihydro nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). The absorbance was recorded at 340 nm and was expressed in mol kg−1 FW.

3.5.3. Enzymatic Browning and Markers of Oxidative Damage

GPX (EC 1.11.1.7) activity was determined as described by Caracciolo et al. [92], with slight modification. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0, 1 mM sodium-EDTA pH 7.0, 8 mM H2O2, 15 mM guaiacol, and 100 μL of crude enzyme extract. GPX activity was monitored at 470 nm, and the results were expressed in nmol g−1 FW.
PPO (EC.1.10.3.1) was defined as described by Battaglia et al. [93], with some modifications. The reaction mixture contained 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.4, 0.07 M catechol, and 50 μL crude enzyme extract and the results were expressed as µmol g−1 FW.
The ortho-diphenols content (o-DiPh) was carried out as reported by Vella et al. [94], with slight modifications. The hydroalcoholic extract was added to the reaction mixture consisting of 0.1 M HCl, 0.3 M sodium nitrite, 80 mM sodium molybdate dihydrate, and 0.2 M sodium hydroxide. The absorbance was recorded at 500 nm, and the results were expressed in mg caffeic acid 100 g−1 FW.
LOX (EC. 1.13.11.34) was carried out as reported by Adiletta et al. [95], with slight modifications. The reaction was conducted in the presence of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6, 5 mM linoleic acid sodium salt, and 100 µL crude enzyme extract (10 µL). LOX activity was recorded at 234 nm and expressed as nmol hydroperoxides g−1 FW.
The MDA content was assessed as highlighted by Goffi et al. [96], with slight modifications. The extraction buffer contained 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid, 0.5% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid, and 0.25 N HCl. Frozen tissue (1:8 w/v) was homogenized with the extraction buffer, held at 95 °C for 30 min, and subsequently cooled on ice. The supernatant’s absorbance was measured at 450, 532, and 600 nm. The amount of MDA was expressed as nmol g−1 FW.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

Mean and standard deviation are the only data expressions (SD). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s test at 5% significance level were used to analyze the mean differences between the minimally processed untreated apples and the coated apples. Different letters indicate differences considered significant at p < 0.05. Pearson’s correlation was used to examine the correlation coefficients between different characteristics (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to explain how treatments affect physicochemical properties and antioxidant systems and to identify the principal components that account for most of the variance in the data set. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software suite (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and OriginPro 2023 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).

4. Conclusions

In this study, a new treatment based on the combined effect of two beneficial and eco-sustainable compounds combined with two organic acids, such as malic and oxalic acid, have been evaluated. CMC and SA are alternately self-assembled on the surface of ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple slices and functionalized with organic acids. This study demonstrated that the combined coating was an efficient tool in controlling the qualitative, biochemical, and enzymatic parameters of fresh-cut apple fruit. The application of this coating led to a decrease in the weight loss, pH, and TSS of the samples, allowing the prolonged cold storage of apple slices. Furthermore, the coatings improved the non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidant defense system with a reduction in oxidative damages. The results demonstrated that CMC+SA+OA+CA significantly inhibited flesh browning, maintained lower color changes, PPO, LOX activity, and o-diphenol and MDA content of fresh-cut apple fruit compared to the control during 12 days of cold storage. The combined use of CMC+SA+OA+CA can be a valid and eco-friendly treatment for fresh-cut apple fruits to prolong their postharvest life during cold storage. Future experiments aim to test the microbiological properties of the layer-by-layer edible coating and consumer acceptability through the establishment of panel tests.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24098315/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and M.P.; methodology, A.M., P.R., G.C. and M.P.; software, A.M.; validation, A.M. and M.P.; formal analysis, A.M., P.R., G.C. and M.P.; investigation, A.M.; resources, M.P.; data curation, A.M., P.R., G.C. and M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M. and M.P.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and M.P.; visualization, M.P.; supervision, M.P.; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Decreto Direttoriale n. 1211 del 30 luglio 2020, Project n. ARS01_00640 “POFACS—Conservabilità, qualità sicurezza dei prodotti ortofrutticoli ad alto contenuto di servizio”, CUP B84E20000250005.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oyenihi, A.B.; Belay, Z.A.; Mditshwa, A.; Caleb, O.J. An apple a day keeps the doctor away: The potentials of apple bioactive constituents for chronic disease prevention. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 2291–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dhalaria, R.; Verma, R.; Kumar, D.; Puri, S.; Tapwal, A.; Kumar, V.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K. Bioactive Compounds of Edible Fruits with Their Anti-Aging Properties: A Comprehensive Review to Prolong Human Life. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gorny, J.R. New opportunities for fresh-cut apples. Fresh Cut. 2003, 11, 404. [Google Scholar]
  4. Toivonen, P.M.; Brummell, D.A. Biochemical bases of appearance and texture changes in fresh-cut fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2008, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Supapvanich, S.; Pimsaga, J.; Srisujan, P. Physicochemical changes in fresh-cut wax apple (Syzygium samarangenese [Blume] Merrill & LM Perry) during storage. Food Chem. 2011, 127, 912–917. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lu, S.; Luo, Y.; Turner, E.; Feng, H. Efficacy of sodium chlorite as an inhibitor of enzymatic browning in apple slices. Food Chem. 2007, 104, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Friedman, M. Food browning and its prevention: An overview. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 631–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumarihami, H.P.C.; Kim, Y.H.; Kwack, Y.B.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.G. Application of chitosan as edible coating to enhance storability and fruit quality of Kiwifruit: A Review. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 292, 110647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rohasmizah, H.; Azizah, M. Pectin-based edible coatings and nanoemulsion for the preservation of fruits and vegetables: A review. Appl. Food Res. 2022, 2, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, H.J. Development of advanced edible coatings for fruits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999, 10, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Menezes, J.; Athmaselvi, K.A. Study on effect of pectin based edible coating on the shelf life of sapota fruits. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 2016, 13, 1195–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kocira, A.; Kozłowicz, K.; Panasiewicz, K.; Staniak, M.; Szpunar-Krok, E.; Hortyńska, P. Polysaccharides as Edible Films and Coatings: Characteristics and Influence on Fruit and Vegetable Quality—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yildirim-Yalcin, M.; Tornuk, F.; Toker, O.S. Recent advances in the improvement of carboxymethyl cellulose-based edible films. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Modesti, M.; Zampella, L.; Petriccione, M. Chitosan mono-and bilayer edible coatings for preserving postharvest quality of fresh fruit. In Polymers for Agri-Food Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 465–486. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wüstenberg, T. Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives in the Food Industry: Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Arnon, H.; Zaitsev, Y.; Porat, R.; Poverenov, E. Effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and chitosan bilayer edible coating on postharvest quality of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 87, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khajeh-Ali, S.; Shahidi, F.; Sedaghat, N. Evaluation of the effect of carboxy methyl cellulose edible coating containing Astragalus honey (Astragalus gossypinus) on the shelf-life of pistachio kernel. Food Control. 2022, 139, 109094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ali, S.; Akbar Anjum, M.; Sattar Khan, A.; Nawaz, A.; Ejaz, S.; Khaliq, G.; Iqbal, S.; Ullah, S.; Naveed Ur Rehman, R.; Moaaz Ali, M.; et al. Carboxymethyl Cellulose Coating Delays Ripening of Harvested Mango Fruits by Regulating Softening Enzymes Activities. Food Chem. 2022, 380, 131804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ali, S.; Anjum, M.A.; Ejaz, S.; Hussain, S.; Ercisli, S.; Saleem, M.S.; Sardar, H. Carboxymethyl cellulose coating delays chilling injury development and maintains eating quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin fruits during low temperature storage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 168, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Shu, C.; Chen, L.; Cao, J.; Jiang, W. The combination treatment of chlorogenic acid and sodium alginate coating could accelerate the wound healing of pear fruit by promoting the metabolic pathway of phenylpropane. Food Chem. 2023, 414, 135689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, C.; Jin, T.; Liu, W.; Hao, W.; Yan, L.; Zheng, L. Effects of hydroxyethyl cellulose and sodium alginate edible coating containing asparagus waste extract on postharvest quality of strawberry fruit. LWT 2021, 148, 111770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gull, A.; Masoodi, F.A.; Masoodi, L.; Gani, A.; Muzaffar, S. Effect of sodium alginate coatings enriched with α-tocopherol on quality of fresh walnut kernels. Food Chem. Adv. 2023, 2, 100169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ruan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y.; Gao, X.; Xiong, G.; Liang, J. Preparation and Antioxidant Activity of Sodium Alginate and Carboxymethyl Cellulose Edible Films with Epigallocatechin Gallate. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 134, 1038–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Han, Y.; Yu, M.; Wang, L. Physical and antimicrobial properties of sodium alginate/carboxymethyl cellulose films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 15, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yinzhe, R.; Shaoying, Z. Effect of Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Alginate Coating Combined with Brewer Yeast on Postharvest Grape Preservation. ISRN Agron. 2013, 2013, 871396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ehteshami, S.; Abdollahi, F.; Ramezanian, A.; Dastjerdi, A.M.; Rahimzadeh, M. Enhanced chilling tolerance of pomegranate fruit by edible coatings combined with malic and oxalic acid treatments. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 250, 388–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zheng, X.; Tian, S. Effect of oxalic acid on control of postharvest browning of litchi fruit. Food Chem. 2006, 96, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tian, S.; Wan, Y.; Qin, G.; Xu, Y. Induction of defense responses against Alternaria rot by different elicitors in harvested pear fruit. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 70, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zheng, X.; Tian, S.; Gidley, M.J.; Yue, H.; Li, B. Effects of exogenous oxalic acid on ripening and decay incidence in mango fruit during storage at room temperature. Posthar Biol. Technol. 2007, 45, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kayashima, T. Oxalic acid is available as a natural antioxidant in some systems. Biochim. Et. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2002, 1573, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, K.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Yuan, C.; Zhong, J.; Chen, Y. Influence of postharvest citric acid and chitosan coating treatment on ripening attributes and expression of cell wall related genes in cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill.) fruit. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 198, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, L.; Liao, T.; Liu, W.; Zou, L.; Liu, C.; Terefe, N.S. Inhibitory effects of organic acids on polyphenol oxidase: From model systems to food systems. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3594–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Apai, W.; Sardsud, V.; Boonprasom, P.; Sardsud, U. Effects of chitosan and citric acid on pericarp browning and polyphenol oxidase activity of longan fruit. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2009, 31, 621–628. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yang, C.; Lee, F.-W.; Cheng, Y.-J.; Chu, Y.-Y.; Chen, C.-N.; Kuan, Y.-C. Chitosan coating formulated with citric acid and pomelo extract retards pericarp browning and fungal decay to extend shelf life of cold-stored lychee. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 310, 111735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rojas-Graü, M.A.; Tapia, M.S.; Martín-Belloso, O. Using polysaccharide-based edible coatings to maintain quality of fresh-cut Fuji apples. LWT 2008, 41, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Du, T.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Su, Z.; Sun, H.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W. Phytochemicals-based edible coating for photodynamic preservation of fresh-cut apples. Food Res. Int. 2023, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mendes-Oliveira, G.; Gu, G.; Luo, Y.; Zografos, A.; Minas, I.; Nou, X. Edible and water-soluble corn zein coating impregnated with nisin for Listeria monocytogenes reduction on nectarines and apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2021, 185, 111811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, Q.; Qing, Y.; Qiang, L.; Du, G.; Shi, K.; Tang, J.; Yan, X.; Chen, H.; Yue, Y.; He, Y.; et al. Improving microbiological and physicochemical properties of fresh-cut apples using carvacrol emulsions. Food Biosci. 2023, 52, 102450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, T.; Li, Z.; Zou, X.; Huang, X.; Zhai, X.; Shi, J.; Shen, T.; Gong, Y.; et al. Novel gellan gum-based probiotic film with enhanced biological activity and probiotic viability: Application for fresh-cut apples and potatoes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, W.; Sarengaowa Guan, Y.; Feng, K. Biosynthesis of Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Activity in Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 25, 906069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Manzoor, S.; Gull, A.; Wani, S.M.; Ganaie, T.A.; Masoodi, F.A.; Bashir, K.; Malik, A.R.; Dar, B.N. Improving the Shelf Life of Fresh Cut Kiwi Using Nanoemulsion Coatings with Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Agents. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 101015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maringgal, B.; Hashim, N.; Tawakkal, I.S.M.A.; Mohamed, M.T.M. Recent advance in edible coating and its effect on fresh/fresh-cut fruits quality. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 96, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Magri, A.; Cice, D.; Capriolo, G.; Petriccione, M. Effects of Ascorbic Acid and Melatonin Treatments on Antioxidant System in Fresh-Cut Avocado Fruits During Cold Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2022, 15, 2468–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wong, C.H.; Mak, I.E.K.; Li, D. Bilayer Edible Coating with Stabilized Lactobacillus Plantarum 299v Improved the Shelf Life and Safety Quality of Fresh-Cut Apple Slices. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 30, 100746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nicolau-Lapeña, I.; Aguiló-Aguayo, I.; Kramer, B.; Abadias, M.; Viñas, I.; Muranyi, P. Combination of Ferulic Acid with Aloe Vera Gel or Alginate Coatings for Shelf-Life Prolongation of Fresh-Cut Apples. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 27, 100620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Harker, F.R.; Marsh, K.B.; Young, H.; Murray, S.H.; Gunson, F.A.; Walker, S.B. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: Sweet and acid taste of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 24, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cofelice, M.; Lopez, F.; Cuomo, F. Quality control of fresh-cut apples after coating application. Foods 2019, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Naqash, F.; Masoodi, F.A.; Ayob, O.; Parvez, S. Effect of active pectin edible coatings on the safety and quality of fresh-cut apple. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 57, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pérez-López, U.; Sgherri, C.; Miranda-Apodaca, J.; Micaelli, F.; Lacuesta, M.; Mena-Petite, A. Concentration of phenolic compounds is increased in lettuce grown under high light intensity and elevated CO2. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 123, 233–241. [Google Scholar]
  50. Gomes-Rochette, N.F.; Da Silveira Vasconcelos, M.; Nabavi, S.M.; Mota, E.F.; Nunes-Pinheiro, D.C.S.; Daglia, M. Fruit as potent natural antioxidants and their biological effects. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2016, 17, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amodio, M.L.; Derossi, A.; Colelli, G. Modeling phenolic content during storage of cut fruit and vegetables: A consecutive reaction mechanism. J. Food Eng. 2014, 140, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Torres-Contreras, A.M.; Nair, V.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A. Stability of bioactive compounds in broccoli as affected by cutting styles and storage time. Molecules 2017, 22, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Reyes, L.F.; Villarreal, J.E.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L. The increase in antioxidant capacity after wounding depends on the type of fruit or vegetable tissue. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1254–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. D’Abrosca, B.; Scognamiglio, M.; Corrado, L.; Chiocchio, I.; Zampella, L.; Mastrobuoni, F.; Petriccione, M. Evaluation of different training systems on Annurca apple fruits revealed by agronomical, qualitative, and NMR-based metabolomic approaches. Food Chem. 2017, 222, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Suza, W.P.; Avila, C.A.; Carruthers, K.; Kulkarni, S.; Goggin, F.L.; Lorence, A. Exploring the impact of wounding and jasmonates on ascorbate metabolism. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yousuf, B.; Qadri, O.S. Preservation of Fresh-Cut Fruits, and Vegetables by Edible Coatings. In Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: Technologies and Mechanisms for Safety Control; Siddiqui, M.W., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  57. Huang, D.; Ou, B.; Prior, R.L. The chemistry behind antioxidant capacity assays. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1841–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Surjadinata, B.B.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L. Biosynthesis of phenolic antioxidants in carrot tissue increases with wounding intensity. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Berno, N.D.; Tezotto-Uliana, J.V.; Santos Dias, C.T.; Kluge, R.A. Storage temperature and type of cut affect the biochemical and physiological characteristics of fresh-cut purple onions. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 93, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Torres-Contreras, A.M.; Nair, V.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Jacobo-Velaìzquez, D.A. Plants as biofactories: Stress-induced production of chlorogenic acid isomers in potato tubers as affected by wounding intensity and storage time. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 62, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, X.; Long, Q.; Gao, F.; Han, C.; Jin, P.; Zheng, Y. Effect of Cutting Styles on Quality and Antioxidant Activity in Fresh-Cut Pitaya Fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 124, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Guan, Y.G.; Hu, W.Z.; Jiang, A.L.; Xu, Y.P.; Zhao, M.R.; Yu, J.X.; Ji, Y.; Yang, X.; Feng, K. The effect of cutting style on the biosynthesis of phenolics and cellular antioxidant capacity in wounded broccoli. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Decros, G.; Baldet, P.; Beauvoit, B.; Stevens, R.; Flandin, A.; Colombié, S.; Gibon, Y.; Pétriacq, P. Get the Balance Right: ROS Homeostasis and Redox Signalling in Fruit. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019, 10, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, B.; Li, M.; Liu, J.; Sun, W.; Min, D.; Li, F.; Li, X. Methyl salicylate pretreatment maintains quality and antioxidant capacity of fresh-cut pitaya fruit by modulating phenylpropanoid metabolism and antioxidant system. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 309, 111705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kou, X.-H.; Guo, W.-l.; Guo, R.-z.; Li, X.-y.; Xue, Z.-h. Hui Effects of Chitosan, Calcium Chloride, and Pullulan Coating Treatments on Antioxidant Activity in Pear Cv. “Huang Guan” during Storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Borhannuddin Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Anee, T.I.; Parvin, K.; Nahar, K.; Al Mahmud, J.; Fujita, M. Regulation of Ascorbate-Glutathione Pathway in Mitigating Oxidative Damage in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, F.; Chang, D.; You, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X. Effects of cellulose nanofibrils treatment on antioxidant properties and aroma of fresh-cut apples. Food Chem. 2023, 415, 135797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yu, K.; Zhou, L.; Xu, J.; Jiang, F.; Zhong, Z.; Zou, L.; Liu, W. Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Water Barrier Coating Regulated Postharvest Quality and ROS Metabolism of Pakchoi (Brassica Chinensis L.). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2022, 185, 111804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, H.; Fan, Z.; Wu, J.; Zhu, S. Effects of Pre-Treatment with S-Nitrosoglutathione-Chitosan Nanoparticles on Quality and Antioxidant Systems of Fresh-Cut Apple Slices. LWT 2021, 139, 110565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ackah, S.; Bi, Y.; Xue, S.; Yakubu, S.; Han, Y.; Zong, Y.; Atuna, R.A.; Prusky, D. Post-harvest chitosan treatment suppresses oxidative stress by regulating reactive oxygen species metabolism in wounded apples. Front. Plant. Sci. 2022, 13, 959762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, Y.; Duan, X.; Qu, H.; Zheng, S. Browning: Enzymatic Browning. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Caballero, B., Finglas, P.M., Toldrá, F., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  72. Sarpong, F.; Oteng-Darko, P.; Golly, M.K.; Amenorfe, L.P.; Rashid, M.T.; Zhou, C. Comparative Study of Enzymes Inactivation and Browning Pigmentation of Apple (Malus Domestica) Slices by Selected Gums during Low Temperature Storage. J. Food Biochem. 2018, 42, e12681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Karagöz, Ş.; Demirdöven, A. Effect of Chitosan Coatings with and without Stevia Rebaudiana and Modified Atmosphere Packaging on Quality of Cold Stored Fresh-Cut Apples. LWT 2019, 108, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pilon, L.; Spricigo, P.C.; Miranda, M.; de Moura, M.R.; Assis, O.B.G.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Ferreira, M.D. Chitosan Nanoparticle Coatings Reduce Microbial Growth on Fresh-Cut Apples While Not Affecting Quality Attributes. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Laudert, D.; Pfannschmidt, U.; Lottspeich, F.; Holländer-Czytko, H.; Weiler, E.W. Cloning, molecular and functional characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana allene oxide synthase (CYP 74), the first enzyme of the octadecanoid pathway to jasmonates. Plant. Mol. Biol. 1996, 31, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hildebrand, D.F. Lipoxygenases. Physiol. Plant. 1989, 76, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Albornoz, K.; Cantwell, M.I.; Zhang, L.; Beckles, D.M. Integrative analysis of postharvest chilling injury in cherry tomato fruit reveals contrapuntal spatio-temporal responses to ripening and cold stress. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ali, S.; Akbar Anjum, M.; Nawaz, A.; Naz, S.; Ejaz, S.; Shahzad Saleem, M.; Tul-Ain Haider, S.; Ul Hasan, M. Effect of Gum Arabic Coating on Antioxidative Enzyme Activities and Quality of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Fruit during Ambient Storage. J. Food Biochem. 2021, 45, 13656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Saleem, M.S.; Ejaz, S.; Anjum, M.A.; Nawaz, A.; Naz, S.; Hussain, S.; Ali, S.; Canan, İ. Postharvest Application of Gum Arabic Edible Coating Delays Ripening and Maintains Quality of Persimmon Fruits during Storage. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2020, 44, 14583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dong, F.; Wang, X. Guar Gum and Ginseng Extract Coatings Maintain the Quality of Sweet Cherry. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 89, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shao, X.F.; Tu, K.; Tu, S.; Tu, J. A Combination of Heat Treatment and Chitosan Coating Delays Ripening and Reduces Decay in “Gala” Apple Fruit. J. Food Qual. 2012, 35, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xin, Y.; Yang, C.; Zhang, J.; Xiong, L. Application of Whey Protein-Based Emulsion Coating Treatment in Fresh-Cut Apple Preservation. Foods 2023, 12, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Alharaty, G.; Ramaswamy, H.S. The Effect of Sodium Alginate-Calcium Chloride Coating on the Quality Parameters and Shelf Life of Strawberry Cut Fruits. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qi, X.; Zhao, J.; Jia, Z.; Cao, Z.; Liu, C.; Li, J.; Su, Y.; Pan, Y.; He, C.; Xu, Y.; et al. Potential Metabolic Pathways and Related Processes Involved in Pericarp Browning for Postharvest Pomegranate Fruits. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Magri, A.; Malorni, L.; Cozzolino, R.; Adiletta, G.; Siano, F.; Picariello, G.; Cice, D.; Capriolo, G.; Nunziata, A.; Di Matteo, M.; et al. Agronomic, Physicochemical, Aromatic and Sensory Characterization of Four Sweet Cherry Accessions of the Campania Region. Plants 2023, 12, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Morra, L.; Bilotto, M.; Mignoli, E.; Sicignano, M.; Magri, A.; Cice, D.; Cozzolino, R.; Malorni, L.; Siano, F.; Picariello, G.; et al. New Mater-Bi, Biodegradable Mulching Film for Strawberry (Fragaria × Ananassa Duch.): Effects on Film Duration, Crop Yields, Qualitative, and Nutraceutical Traits of Fruits. Plants 2022, 11, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Malorni, L.; Cozzolino, R.; Magri, A.; Zampella, L.; Petriccione, M. Influence of Plant-Based Biostimulant (BORTAN) on Qualitative and Aromatic Traits of Rocket Salad (Diplotaxis tenuifolia L.). Plants 2023, 12, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cirillo, A.; Magri, A.; Scognamiglio, M.; D’Abrosca, B.; Fiorentino, A.; Petriccione, M.; Di Vaio, C. Evaluation of Morphological, Qualitative, and Metabolomic Traits during Fruit Ripening in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Horticulturae 2022, 8, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Magri, A.; Petriccione, M. Melatonin treatment reduces qualitative decay and improves antioxidant system in highbush blueberry fruit during cold storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 102, 4229–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Magri, A.; Adiletta, G.; Petriccione, M. Evaluation of antioxidant systems and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in feijoa edible flowers at different flowering stages. Foods 2020, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Caracciolo, G.; Magri, A.; Petriccione, M.; Maltoni, M.L.; Baruzzi, G. Influence of cold storage on pear physico-chemical traits and antioxidant systems in relation to superficial scald development. Foods 2020, 9, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Battaglia, V.; Sorrentino, R.; Verrilli, G.; del Piano, L.; Sorrentino, M.C.; Petriccione, M.; Sicignano, M.; Magri, A.; Cermola, M.; Cerrato, D.; et al. Potential Use of Cardunculus Biomass on Pleurotus eryngii Production: Heteroglycans Content and Nutritional Properties (Preliminary Results). Foods 2023, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Vella, F.M.; Cautela, D.; Laratta, B. Characterization of Polyphenolic Compounds in Cantaloupe Melon By-Products. Foods 2019, 8, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Adiletta, G.; Magri, A.; Albanese, D.; Liguori, L.; Sodo, M.; Di Matteo, M.; Petriccione, M. Overall quality and oxidative damage in packaged freshly shelled walnut kernels during cold storage. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 3483–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Goffi, V.; Magri, A.; Botondi, R.; Petriccione, M. Response of antioxidant system to postharvest ozone treatment in ‘Soreli’ kiwifruit. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 7. Pearson’s correlation matrix for qualitative and biochemical traits (p < 0.01).
Figure 7. Pearson’s correlation matrix for qualitative and biochemical traits (p < 0.01).
Ijms 24 08315 g007
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters (WL: weight loss; TSS: total soluble solid; TA: titratable acidity) of control (C) and treated with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0 (T0), 4 (T1), 8 (T2), and 12 days (T3) of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. The results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters (WL: weight loss; TSS: total soluble solid; TA: titratable acidity) of control (C) and treated with CMC+SA (TA), CMC+SA+CA (TB), CMC+SA+AO (TC), and CMC+SA+CA+AO (TD) fresh-cut ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ apple after 0 (T0), 4 (T1), 8 (T2), and 12 days (T3) of cold storage at 4 °C ± 0.5. The results are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Physicochemical TraitsTimingCTATBTCTD
WL (%)T00 ± 0 a0 ± 0 a0 ± 0 a0 ± 0 a0 ± 0 a
T12.36 ± 0.07 i0.73 ± 0.03 de0.57 ± 0.01 c0.32 ± 0.01 b0.20 ± 0.02 b
T24.06 ± 0.10 l1.39 ± 0.06 g1.18 ± 0.03 f0.72 ± 0.04 de0.5 ± 0.02 c
T34.94 ± 0.18 m1.63 ± 0.03 h1.41 ± 0.05 g0.85 ± 0.01 e0.72 ± 0.02 de
TSS (°Brix)T011.3 ± 0.06 a11.3 ± 0.07 a11.3 ± 0.06 a11.3 ± 0.06 a11.3 ± 0.06 a
T112.4 ± 0.03 g11.6 ± 0.06 cd11.6 ± 0.03 cd11.4 ± 0.03 ab11.4 ± 0.03 ab
T212.8 ± 0.06 h12.2 ± 0.10 f12 ± 0.06 e11.7 ± 0.06 d11.5 ± 0.06 bc
T313.6 ± 0.09 i12.6 ± 0.10 h12.4 ± 0.06 g12.1 ± 0.06 f11.9 ± 0.06 e
TA (g MAE L−1)T09.28 ± 0.06 h9.28 ± 0.06 h9.28 ± 0.06 h9.28 ± 0.06 h9.28 ± 0.06 h
T18.24 ± 0.08 c9.28 ± 0.13 h9.15 ± 0.06 efgh9.31 ± 0.08 h9.31 ± 0.08 h
T27.87 ± 0.09 b8.95 ± 0.07 def9.01 ± 0.02 defg9.25 ± 0.08 gh9.18 ± 0.04 fgh
T37.64 ± 0.16 a8.81 ± 0.07 d8.91 ± 0.04 de9.11 ± 0.04 efgh9.15 ± 0.06 efgh
pHT04.06 ± 0.02 a4.06 ± 0.02 a4.06 ± 0.02 a4.06 ± 0.02 a4.06 ± 0.02 a
T14.16 ± 0.02 de4.15 ± 0.04 cde4.16 ± 0.01 de4.13 ± 0.01 bcd4.06 ± 0.01 a
T24.18 ± 0.01 de4.17 ± 0.02 de4.16 ± 0.01 de4.16 ± 0.01 de4.10 ± 0.01 ab
T34.25 ± 0.01 g4.23 ± 0.01 fg4.19 ± 0.01 ef4.19 ± 0.01 ef4.11 ± 0.01 abc
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magri, A.; Rega, P.; Capriolo, G.; Petriccione, M. Impact of Novel Active Layer-by-Layer Edible Coating on the Qualitative and Biochemical Traits of Minimally Processed ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ Apple Fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098315

AMA Style

Magri A, Rega P, Capriolo G, Petriccione M. Impact of Novel Active Layer-by-Layer Edible Coating on the Qualitative and Biochemical Traits of Minimally Processed ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ Apple Fruit. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(9):8315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098315

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magri, Anna, Pietro Rega, Giuseppe Capriolo, and Milena Petriccione. 2023. "Impact of Novel Active Layer-by-Layer Edible Coating on the Qualitative and Biochemical Traits of Minimally Processed ‘Annurca Rossa del Sud’ Apple Fruit" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 9: 8315. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098315

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop