Next Article in Journal
Biodegradable Polymers and Polymer Composites with Antibacterial Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
“Omics” Techniques Used in Marine Biofouling Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrolyzed Conchiolin Protein (HCP) Extracted from Pearls Antagonizes both ET-1 and α-MSH for Skin Whitening
Previous Article in Special Issue
TRPM7-Mediated Ca2+ Regulates Mussel Settlement through the CaMKKβ-AMPK-SGF1 Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms24087474
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Two-Component System Response Regulator ompR Regulates Mussel Settlement through Exopolysaccharides

by
Wei Ma
1,2,†,
Xiaoyu Wang
1,2,†,
Wen Zhang
1,2,
Xiaomeng Hu
1,2,
Jin-Long Yang
1,2,* and
Xiao Liang
1,2,*
1
International Research Center for Marine Biosciences, Ministry of Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center for Cultivating Elite Breeds and Green-Culture of Aquaculture Animals, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7474; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087474
Submission received: 6 March 2023 / Revised: 12 April 2023 / Accepted: 14 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofouling and Antifouling: Application of Omics Technologies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The outer membrane protein (OMP) is a kind of biofilm matrix component that widely exists in Gram-negative bacteria. However, the mechanism of OMP involved in the settlement of molluscs is still unclear. In this study, the mussel Mytilus coruscus was selected as a model to explore the function of ompR, a two-component system response regulator, on Pseudoalteromonas marina biofilm-forming capacity and the mussel settlement. The motility of the ΔompR strain was increased, the biofilm-forming capacity was decreased, and the inducing activity of the ΔompR biofilms in plantigrades decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The extracellular α-polysaccharide and β-polysaccharide of the ΔompR strain decreased by 57.27% and 62.63%, respectively. The inactivation of the ompR gene decreased the ompW gene expression and had no impact on envZ expression or c-di-GMP levels. Adding recombinant OmpW protein caused the recovery of biofilm-inducing activities, accompanied by the upregulation of exopolysaccharides. The findings deepen the understanding of the regulatory mechanism of bacterial two-component systems and the settlement of benthic animals.

1. Introduction

Mytilus coruscus belongs to Mytillidae, which is a typical large fouling organism, and one of the commercial bivalve molluscs [1,2]. In the life cycle of most benthic invertebrates, the process of settlement is necessary for larvae to grow into adults [3]. Unraveling the settlement mechanism is important for developing environment-friendly macrofouling techniques and artificial breeding in marine aquaculture. In the marine environment, a huge number of bacteria exist in the form of biofilms, which coordinate the settlement of benthic animals including mussels [4,5,6].
Biofilms are composed of bacteria and matrix, which can attach to the surface of the base and grow [7,8]. In most bacterial biofilms, the biomass of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) is much higher than that of bacteria, and the EPS include exopolysaccharides, exoproteins, exolipids, etc., which contribute greatly to the formation of biofilms [9,10]. It was proved that some particular bacterial strains in biofilms can promote benthic invertebrates to settle [11,12,13,14].
Gram-negative bacteria are the dominant bacteria in marine bacteria, which are protected by inner and outer membranes [15]. The outer membrane is a selective barrier for substances to enter cells [16], and nutrients cannot directly enter and exit the outer membrane. The outer layer of cells is the outer membrane protein (OMP), which can input nutrients and transform signals from the external environment [17]. Among them, OMPs have strong immunogenicity [18,19], and can mediate intercellular adhesion [20] and the interaction between bacteria and object surfaces, thus forming mature biofilms [21]. In many Gram-negative bacteria, it was found that OmpR can regulate the pore protein of the outer membrane [22]. As a significant global regulatory factor, OmpR can regulate a variety of physiological activities of bacteria, including the expression of outer membrane porin and virulence factors, the formation of bacterial flagella, as well as bacterial motility and chemotaxis [23,24]. The EnvZ/OmpR system of Escherichia coli is a widely studied two-component regulatory system that mediates signal transduction and the expression of outer membrane proteins, as well as biofilm formation [25,26,27]. In Cronobacter sakazakii, it was found that the biofilm formation ability of the ompW gene deletion mutant was increased in response to environmental stress [28]. The outer membrane protein OmpW is an elongated barrel that spans the inner and outer membranes, which can protect bacteria by resisting adverse environmental pressures [29].
Pseudoalteromonas marina is a Gram-negative bacterium widely present in the marine environment [30]. P. marina can secrete abundant EPS to form marine biofilms [6,31]. Previous studies have shown that Pseudoalteromonas can produce many biologically active substances [32] and induce the settlement of benthic invertebrates [13,33,34,35]. Deleting the fliP gene of P. marina brought about an increase in exoprotein, which inhibited the settlement of mussels [36]. Deleting the 01,912 genes of P. marina increased the colanic acid and exopolysaccharide levels, thus promoting the settlement of mussels [6]. OmpW, a prominent OMP of EPS [29,37], has been proven to regulate biofilm formation in other bacteria [28,38]. The interaction between OmpW and biofilm and how the outer membrane regulator impact OmpW remains unclear.
This study explored the relationships between OMP regulator gene ompR, OmpW, biofilm formation, and mussel settlement by constructing a mutant strain of a two-component system response regulator. Here, ompR gene knockout in P. marina was used to (1) analyze the effect on the ability of bacterial growth and biofilm formation; (2) confirm the impacts on inducing mussel settlement activity; and (3) detect the expression difference in the ompW gene and explain the relationship between ompR, ompW, EPS, and settlement.

2. Results

2.1. Colony Morphology, Growth, Swimming Motility, and Biofilm-Forming Ability

The gene ompR was identified by genome annotation from the complete genome of P. marina. The in-frame deletion mutant of ompR of P. marina was constructed, and the coding region was deleted by 721 bp (Figure 1). The biological characteristics of the mutant strain with the deletion of the ompR gene were explored (Figure 2). The single colony of wild-type and mutant strains was regular and round with a smooth surface, and there was no obvious change between them (Figure 2A). Wild-type and mutant strains grew rapidly from 3 to 6 h and gradually slowed down after 12 h. During 6 to 9 h, the growth ability of P. marina was significantly faster than the ΔompR strain (p < 0.05, Figure 2B).
In comparison with P. marina, the ΔompR strain showed enhanced motility, which had a greater range of motion (Figure 2C). The knockout of the ompR gene affected the motility of strains, and the diameter of the formed motile migration zone also increased by 70.93% in contrast to P. marina (p < 0.05, Figure 2D).
CLSM scanning images showed that there were more bacteria clustered in the P. marina biofilms, and the bacterial distribution of the mutant biofilms was significantly loose and reduced compared to the P. marina biofilms (Figure 3A). The biofilm thickness of the ΔompR strain decreased by 24.54% compared to P. marina biofilms (p < 0.05, Figure 3B), so the mutant strain had a weaker biofilm formation ability. In the biofilms formed by the ΔompR strain co-cultured with 10 mg L−1 recombinant OmpW protein, the number of bacteria on the biofilms increased, and the distribution and aggregation of bacteria on the biofilm surface were similar to the wild-type biofilms (Figure 3A), with the biofilm thickness increasing significantly (p < 0.05, Figure 3B), and reaching the levels of P. marina.

2.2. Knockout of ompR Gene Inhibited Mussel Settlement

By comparing with P. marina, the biofilm formation ability of the ΔompR strain and the inducing activity to the plantigrade settlement of M. coruscus were investigated. It was revealed that the deletion of the ompR gene significantly reduced the settlement rate of plantigrades (p < 0.05), and the settlement rate decreased most significantly when the bacterial density was 1 × 108 cells mL−1. Compared with the P. marina biofilms, the induction activity of the mutant biofilms decreased by 45.16% (Figure 4A). In addition, at different initial bacterial densities, the ΔompR biofilm densities all decreased significantly (p < 0.05, Figure 4B).

2.3. CLSM Images of Biofilms

To further analyze the effect of ompR deletion on biofilm formation ability, the CLSM images showed that the extracellular α-polysaccharide, β-polysaccharide, and protein contents were changed significantly in wild-type strains and mutant strains. There was no significant difference in lipid content (Figure 5A). Statistical analysis of the data of the EPS also showed a trend consistent with the results of CLSM scanning. The levels of α-polysaccharide, β-polysaccharide, and protein present in the ΔompR biofilms were lower than those in P. marina biofilms by 57.27%, 62.63%, and 41.09%, respectively (p < 0.05, Figure 5B).
The extracellular α-polysaccharide, β-polysaccharide and protein levels of ΔompR biofilms (with 10 mg L−1 OmpW) and wild-type biofilms were significantly higher than ΔompR biofilms; however, the biovolumes of α-polysaccharide and β-polysaccharide of the ΔompR biofilms with 10 mg L−1 OmpW were still lower than the wild-type biofilms (Figure 5A), which reached 75.18% (p < 0.05) and 58.35% (p < 0.05) of the wild-type biofilms levels, respectively. The exolipid contents did not change significantly among the three groups (Figure 5B).

2.4. Relative Expression of ompR, envZ, and ompW Gene and C-di-GMP Content

After the ompR gene was knocked out, the relative expression of the envZ gene between the wild-type biofilms and ΔompR biofilms had no significant difference (p > 0.05, Figure 6A). The expression results of the ompW gene in the biofilms of the wild-type and mutant strains showed that the ompW gene expressed in both strains; however, the expression level of the ompW gene in the ΔompR biofilms was significantly lower (67.05% lower) than in the P. marina biofilms (p < 0.05, Figure 6B). No significant difference in the bacterial c-di-GMP concentrations between the two strains was found (p > 0.05, Figure 6C).

2.5. Settlement-Inducing Activity of ΔompR Biofilms Formed by the ΔompR Strain Co-Cultured with Recombinant OmpW Protein

Four concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1 recombinant outer membrane protein OmpW were added into ΔompR bacterial solution to form biofilms, respectively. The addition of 10 mg L−1 recombinant OmpW significantly improved the induction activity of the mutant biofilms and restored them to the level of wild-type biofilms (p > 0.05, Figure 7A). The biofilm bacterial density was increased significantly than the mutant biofilms (p < 0.05, Figure 7B) compared with the biofilms formed by ΔompR strains co-cultured with different concentrations of the recombinant OmpW protein.

3. Discussion

Many studies have shown that biofilms can affect the settlement of benthic invertebrates, such as Hydroides elegans and Mytilus galloprovincialis [39,40]. Signaling molecules released by biofilms to induce the settlement of benthic animals are related to EPS; however, the molecular basis of EPS regulation is unclear. Here, our investigation revealed for the first time that the deletion of the ompR gene could downregulate the outer membrane protein gene ompW and reduce the content of exopolysaccharides, thus effectively decreasing the settlement of mussels.
The deletion of the ompR gene enhanced bacterial motility and inhibited biofilm formation in this study. In E. coli, OmpR plays a negative regulatory role in the expression of the flagella flhDC gene [41]. In Xenorhabdus nematophila, deletion of the ompR gene can significantly promote bacterial swimming ability [42]. Furthermore, motility is a major dynamic feature [43]. The slow motility properties stabilize the bacterial adhesion process in P. marina [6]. In this study, the lower biofilm density and thickness may result from the deletion of the ompR gene, which improved the bacterial motility, resulting in the reduction in cell aggregation and poor biofilm formation ability.
In this study, the knockout of the ompR gene in P. marina caused a distinct decrease in the expression level of the ompW gene, accompanied by the downregulation of the content of exopolysaccharides. In Shewanella oneidensis, it was found that the EnvZ/OmpR-dependent regulation of the porin gene almost completely exists in ompR, and only partially in envZ [44]. Similarly, our present study found that there was no significant difference in the expression level of the envZ gene when deleting the ompR gene. Thus, the ompR gene regulates the change in the exopolysaccharide content of the biofilm, which may be not through the envZ gene.
In some bacteria, ompR has been found to regulate the outer membrane proteins [45,46,47]. EnvZ/OmpR can induce the expression of multiple OMP genes, including ompW [48]. Our studies suggested that the deletion of the ompR gene in P. marina caused the downregulation of ompW gene expression and the decrease in exopolysaccharides in the mutant biofilms. Furthermore, the results of the OmpW replenishment experiment showed that the addition of the exogenous protein OmpW increased the content of polysaccharides in the biofilms formed by the mutant bacteria. Therefore, it is speculated that the content change in exopolysaccharides in bacterial biofilms is related to the OmpW protein. However, whether extracellularly added OmpW has similar effects to the naturally expressed OmpW localized in the membrane is unknown. In addition, how extracellularly added protein participates in the secretion of exopolysaccharides remains unclear.
The results of this research indicated that the knockout of the ompR gene did not change the content of bacterial c-di-GMP. In Klebsiella pneumoniae, the ompR gene was found to be the key regulator of the c-di-GMP signal pathway and in affecting the biofilm biovolume [49]. Under the condition of the low osmotic pressure of Yersinia enterocolitica, the deletion of the ompR gene brought about fewer c-di-GMP produced by bacteria [50]. This means that the regulatory relationship between the ompR gene and the second messenger is different in diverse bacteria.
Bacterial exopolysaccharides are key inducers for the larval settlement of benthic invertebrates [6,35,51]. In this study, the inactivation of the ompR gene was the cause of lower extracellular α-polysaccharide and β-polysaccharide levels in ΔompR biofilms. In addition, higher exopolysaccharide levels of biofilms formed by the ΔompR strain co-cultured with recombinant OmpW protein were found. Simultaneously, the induced activity of the ΔompR biofilms was upregulated and recovered to the level of P. marina biofilms after adding the recombinant protein OmpW. Moreover, after deleting the ompR gene, the expression level of the ompW gene decreased, and the content of the exoprotein decreased, suggesting that the expression of the OmpW protein may be reduced. Therefore, it is speculated the reduction in the OmpW protein of ΔompR biofilms reduces the content of exopolysaccharides, thereby inhibiting the settlement of mussels.
Notably, after OmpW supplementation, the biofilm-forming capacity of the ΔompR biofilms increased to the levels of the wild-type biofilms, and the exoprotein content of the ΔompR biofilms recovered to the same levels as the wild-type biofilms. However, the exopolysaccharide content of the reconstituted biofilms was significantly higher than that of the mutant biofilms, but still less than the P. marina biofilms. Furthermore, the types and components of exopolysaccharides affected by the exogenous protein addition need further study. On the other hand, the present study did not conduct the complementation test of the ompR gene back into the deletion strain. Thus, whether a complementation test of the ompR gene into the mutant can restore the biofilm-forming capacity and biofilm-inducing activity remains unclear and needs further bioassays.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mussel Plantigrade Cultivation and Recombinant Outer Membrane Protein

The mussel plantigrades tested in the investigation were purchased from the Zhoushan coast (122°75′ E; 30°71′ N). These plantigrades were used after being cultured in naturally filtered seawater for a week. The plantigrades (shell length: 0.56 ± 0.03 mm, shell height: 0.38 ± 0.02 mm) were selected and applied to subsequent settlement experiments. Recombinant outer membrane protein OmpW was obtained from Hangzhou Hua’an Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China).

4.2. Strains and Plasmids

P. marina was isolated from the natural biofilms. P. marina and ΔompR were both cultivated in Zobell 2216E medium at 25 °C, and the Escherichia coli WM3064 was cultured with 0.3 mM 2,6-diamino-pimelic acid in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37 °C [30,52,53]. Fifty μg mL−1 kanamycins and 25 μg mL−1 erythromycin were added in the construction of the mutant strain to maintain the resistance. The specific information is shown in Table 1.

4.3. Construction of ΔompR Strain

The ΔompR strain was constructed, as previously described [35,53]. The primers used in the experiment were designed according to the ompR gene of P. marina. Finally, the ΔompR mutant was tested using ompR-SF/ompR-LR, ompR-LF/ompR-SR, ompR-SF/ompR-SR, and ompR-LF/ompR-LR. Table 1 exhibits the primers used to amplify the upstream and downstream of the target fragment of the ompR gene.

4.4. Colony Morphology and Growth Ability Determination

The bacteria were incubated at a constant temperature of 25 °C at 200 r/min and then spread on 2216E solid medium after gradient dilution for 5–7 days before filming. The OD600 absorbance of P. marina and ΔompR strains were measured using a spectrophotometer at 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 24 h after culture with 2216E liquid medium at 25 °C (200 r/min).

4.5. Swimming Motility and Migration Zone Diameter

After the tested strains were cultured for 16–18 h, 1 μL of the P. marina and ΔompR bacterial solutions were dropped vertically on the swimming medium. After incubation at 25 °C for 16–18 h, the swimming trajectory was observed. The diameter of the migration zone diameter was determined by setting up 3 groups with 10 parallels in each group.

4.6. The Formation of Biofilms

After being cultured for 16–18 h, the cell precipitations of the P. marina and ΔompR strains were obtained after centrifugation at 3500 r/min for 15 min, being blown and cleaned in autoclaved filtered seawater (AFSW) 3 times, and then adjusted to a volume of 50 mL. The initial bacterial densities were diluted to 1 × 106, 1 × 107, 1 × 108, and 5 × 108 cells mL−1, and the corresponding bacterial solution and AFSW were added to each glass Petri dish. All dishes were loaded with sterilized slides, shielded from light, and stored at 18 °C for 48 h to form biofilms.
The recombinant protein OmpW was added to the bacteria solution (1 × 108 cells mL−1) to form biofilms. The concentration gradient of OmpW was set at 0, 1, 5, 10, and 20 mg L−1.

4.7. The Thickness of Biofilms

Tested biofilms were soaked in formalin for half an hour in advance and then rinsed with 0.9% normal saline. Propidium iodide solution was added to the biofilm for 20 min, and the dye was removed with normal saline. To measure the biofilm thickness, the images of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were collected [6,31]. Each biofilm had three biological replicates, and ten domains were randomly selected for each biofilm.

4.8. The Bacterial Density of Biofilms

After being fixed in 5% formaldehyde solution for more than 24 h, the tested biofilms were soaked in acridine orange solution for 5 min in the dark, then the dye was dried and the samples sealed. Each biofilm test contained three biological replicates, and ten fields were randomly selected from each biofilm to count the cell density using a fluorescence microscope at 1000×.

4.9. Settlement Bioassay

A glass slide containing biofilm was placed in a Petri dish to which 20 mL AFSW and 10 plantigrades were added into one dish, and 9 replicates were set per group. The samples were then incubated at 18 °C in the dark, and the settlement of the plantigrades was observed at 48 h.

4.10. CLSM of Biofilms

Biofilms were stained with 50–70 μL of the corresponding dyes. α-polysaccharide was stained with ConA-TMR, β-polysaccharide was stained with Calcofluor White stain, DiD Oil was used to stain lipids, and FITC was used to stain protein. After 25 min, the floating color on the surface was washed off and the images were captured under a Leica confocal microscope, as previously described in the methods of the literature [6,31]. Recombinant OmpW protein was added at a concentration of 10 mg L−1 to the ΔompR bacteria solution (1 × 108 cells mL−1) to form biofilms for CLSM images.

4.11. RT-qPCR of Biofilms and Bacterial C-di-GMP

The bacterial RNA of wild-type and ΔompR biofilms was extracted using Trizol reagent, and the cDNA was then obtained by reverse transcription and stored at −20 °C for later use. According to the CDS sequences of the envZ and ompW genes, the corresponding envZ -RT-F/R and ompW-RT-F/R primers were designed using Primer 5.0 (Table 2), and gyrB were used as the internal control gene. The qPCR experiment was conducted with the Cham Q TM Universal SYBR® qPCR Master Mix Kit. The relative expressions of the envZ and ompW genes in biofilms formed by wild-type and mutant strains were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method and shown as mean ± standard deviation.
The determination of c-di-GMP content was conducted per the previously described method [6].

4.12. Data Analysis

Image J software (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, version 1.52a) was utilized to analyze the CLSM images of EPS on biofilms and SPSS 25.0 software was used for differential analysis.

5. Conclusions

Knocking out the ompR gene upregulated the bacterial motility and downregulated the biofilm-inducing and forming capacity, accompanied by a decrease in the outer membrane protein ompW gene expression levels and exopolysaccharides, thus inhibiting the settlement of M. coruscus. In addition, OmpW protein supplementation increased the content of exopolysaccharides and promoted mussel settlement. This study is positively significant in exploring the interaction between outer membrane proteins and settlement and provides new insight into the interaction between biofilms and hosts.

Author Contributions

J.-L.Y. and X.L.: supervision, funding acquisition, conceptualization, validation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, and visualization. W.M., X.W. and W.Z.: methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, and writing—original draft preparation. X.H.: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, and writing—original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (20XD1421800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41876159), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFE0204600), the Shanghai Foreign High-End Talent Project (22WZ2504500), the Science and technology innovation action plan “The Belt and Road international joint laboratory construction projects”, and the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai (19590750500).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, J.L.; Li, X.; Liang, X.; Bao, W.Y.; Shen, H.D.; Li, J.L. Effects of natural biofilms on settlement of plantigrades of the mussel Mytilus coruscus. Aquaculture 2014, 424–425, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, C.; Bao, W.Y.; Gu, Z.Q.; Li, Y.F.; Liang, X.; Ling, Y.; Cai, S.L.; Shen, H.D.; Yang, J.L. Larval settlement and metamorphosis of the mussel Mytilus coruscus in response to natural biofilms. Biofouling 2012, 28, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cavalcanti, G.S.; Alker, A.T.; Delherbe, N.; Malter, K.E.; Shikuma, N.J. The influence of bacteria on animal metamorphosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 74, 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bao, W.Y.; Yang, J.L.; Satuito, C.G.; Kitamura, H. Larval metamorphosis of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in response to Alteromonas sp. 1: Evidence for two chemical cues? Mar. Biol. 2007, 152, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, J.L.; Shen, P.J.; Liang, X.; Li, Y.F.; Bao, W.Y.; Li, J.L. Larval settlement and metamorphosis of the mussel Mytilus coruscus in response to monospecific bacterial biofilms. Biofouling 2013, 29, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Peng, L.H.; Liang, X.; Chang, R.H.; Mu, J.Y.; Chen, H.E.; Yoshida, A.; Osatomi, K.; Yang, J.L. A bacterial polysaccharide biosynthesis-related gene inversely regulates larval settlement and metamorphosis of Mytilus coruscus. Biofouling 2020, 36, 753–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Harrison, F.; Buckling, A. Siderophore production and biofilm formation as linked social traits. ISME J. 2009, 3, 632–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sauer, K.; Stoodley, P.; Goeres, D.M.; Hall-Stoodley, L.; Burmølle, M.; Stewart, P.S.; Bjarnsholt, T. The biofilm life cycle: Expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J.W.; Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harder, T.; Lam, C.; Qian, P.Y. Induction of larval settlement in the polychaete Hydroides elegans by marine biofilms: An investigation of monospecific diatom films as settlement cues. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2002, 229, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dahms, H.U.; Dobretsov, S.; Qian, P.Y. The effect of bacterial and diatom biofilms on the settlement of the bryozoan Bugula neritina. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004, 313, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huggett, M.J.; Williamson, J.E.; Nys, R.D.; Kjelleberg, S.; Steinberg, P.D. Larval settlement of the common Australian sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma in response to bacteria from the surface of coralline algae. Oecologia 2006, 149, 604–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huggett, M.J.; Nedved, B.T.; Hadfield, M.G. Effects of initial surface wettability on biofilm formation and subsequent settlement of Hydroides elegans. Biofouling 2009, 25, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gan, L.; Chen, S.; Jensen, G.J. Molecular organization of Gram-negative peptidoglycan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 18953–18957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gupta, R.S. Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: A reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 1435–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Matsuo, Y.; Kido, Y.; Yamaoka, Y. Helicobacter pylori Outer Membrane Protein-Related Pathogenesis. Toxins 2017, 9, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Donnelly, J.J.; Deck, R.R.; Liu, M.A. Immunogenicity of a Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide-Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein complex conjugate vaccine. J. Immunol. 1990, 145, 3071–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wetzler, L.M.; Ho, Y.; Reiser, H. Neisserial porins induce B lymphocytes to express costimulatory B7-2 molecules and to proliferate. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1151–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Soto, G.E.; Hultgren, S.J. Bacterial adhesins: Common themes and variations in architecture and assembly. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 1059–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davey, M.E.; O’Toole, G.A. Microbial biofilms: From ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000, 64, 847–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martıínez-Hackert, E.; Stock, A.M. Structural relationships in the OmpR family of winged-helix transcription factors. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 269, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aiba, H.; Mizuno, T. Phosphorylation of a bacterial activator protein, OmpR, by a protein kinase, EnvZ, stimulates the transcription of the ompF and ompC genes in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1990, 261, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shimada, T.; Takada, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Ishihama, A. Expanded roles of two-component response regulator OmpR in Escherichia coli: Genomic SELEX search for novel regulation targets. Genes Cells 2015, 20, 915–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Harrison-McMonagle, P.; Denissova, N.; Martıínez-Hackert, E.; Ebright, R.H.; Stock, A.M. Orientation of OmpR monomers within an OmpR:DNA complex determined by DNA affinity cleaving. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 555–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prigent-Combaret, C.; Brombacher, E.; Vidal, O.; Ambert, A.; Lejeune, P.; Landini, P.; Dorel, C. Complex regulatory network controls initial adhesion and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli via regulation of the csgD gene. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 7213–7223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cai, S.J.; Inouye, M. EnvZ–OmpR interaction and osmoregulation in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 24155–24161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ye, Y.W.; Ling, N.; Gao, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.F.; Tong, L.W.; Zeng, H.Y.; Zhang, J.M.; Wu, Q.P. Roles of outer membrane protein W (OmpW) on survival, morphology, and biofilm formation under NaCl stresses in Cronobacter sakazakii. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3844–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hong, H.; Patel, D.R.; Tamm, L.K.; Berg, B.V.D. The outer membrane protein OmpW forms an eight-stranded beta-barrel with a hydrophobic channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 7568–7577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, L.H.; Liang, X.; Guo, X.P.; Yoshida, A.; Osatomi, K.; Yang, J.L. Complete genome of Pseudoalteromonas marina ECSMB14103, a mussel settlement-inducing bacterium isolated from the East China Sea. Mar. Genom. 2018, 41, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, X.M.; Zhang, J.; Ding, W.Y.; Liang, X.; Wan, R.; Dobretsov, S.; Yang, J.L. Reduction of mussel metamorphosis by inactivation of the bacterial thioesterase gene via alteration of the fatty acid composition. Biofouling 2021, 37, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Holmström, C.; Kjelleberg, S. Marine Pseudoalteromonas species are associated with higher organisms and produce biologically active extracellular agents. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1999, 30, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Negri, A.P.; Webster, N.S.; Hill, R.T.; Heyward, A.J. Metamorphosis of broadcast spawning corals in response to bacteria isolated from crustose algae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001, 223, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Webster, N.S.; Smith, L.D.; Heyward, A.J.; Watts, J.E.M.; Webb, R.I.; Blackall, L.L.; Negri, A.P. Metamorphosis of a scleractinian coral in response to microbial biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1213–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liang, X.; Zhang, J.B.; Shao, A.Q.; Hu, X.M.; Wan, R.; Yang, J.L. Bacterial cellulose synthesis gene regulates cellular c-di-GMP that control Biofilm formation and mussel larval settlement. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2021, 165, 105330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liang, X.; Zhang, X.K.; Peng, L.H.; Zhu, Y.T.; Yoshida, A.; Osatomi, K.; Yang, J.L. The flagellar gene regualtes biofilm formation and mussel larval settlement and metamorphosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, X.P.; Chen, Q.Y.; Zhang, X.G.; Chen, X.L.; Luo, D.S.; Zhong, Q.P. Antibiofilm and Antiquorum Sensing Potential of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Z057 against Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Foods 2022, 11, 2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gil-Marqués, M.L.; Pachón, J.; Smani, Y. iTRAQ-Based quantitative proteomic analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii under hypoxia and normoxia reveals the role of OmpW as a Virulence factor. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0232821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, S.; Hadfield, M.G. Composition and density of bacterial biofilms determine larval settlement of the polychaete Hydroides elegans. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003, 260, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, J.L.; Guo, X.P.; Ding, W.Y.; Gao, W.; Huang, D.F.; Chen, Y.R.; Liang, X. Interactions between natural biofilm, substratum surface wettability, and mussel plantigrade settlement. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2017, 60, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shin, S.; Park, C. Modulation of flagellar expression in Escherichia coli by acetyl phosphate and the osmoregulator OmpR. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4696–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kim, D.J.; Boylan, B.; George, N.; Forst, S. Inactivation of ompR promotes precocious swarming and flhDC expression in Xenorhabdus nematophila. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 5290–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Son, K.; Brumley, D.R.; Stocker, R. Live from under the lens: Exploring microbial motility with dynamic imaging and microfluidics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 761–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yuan, J.; Wei, B.Y.; Shi, M.M.; Gao, H.C. Functional assessment of EnvZ/OmpR two-component system in Shewanella oneidensis. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dorman, C.J.; Chatfield, S.; Higgins, C.F.; Hayward, C.; Dougan, G. Characterization of porin and ompR mutants of a virulent strain of Salmonella typhimurium: ompR mutants are attenuated in vivo. Infect. Immun. 1989, 57, 2136–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Head, C.G.; Tardy, A.; Kenney, L.J. Relative binding affinities of OmpR and OmpR-phosphate at the ompF and ompC regulatory sites. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 281, 857–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Villarreal, J.M.; Becerra-Lobato, N.; Rebollar-Flores, J.E.; Medina-Aparicio, L.; Carbajal-Gómez, E.; Zavala-García, M.L.; Vázquez, A.; Gutiérrez-Ríos, R.M.; Olvera, L.; Encarnación, S.; et al. The Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi ltrR-ompR-ompC-ompF genes are involved in resistance to the bile salt sodium deoxycholate and in bacterial transformation. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 92, 1005–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ko, D.; Choi, S.H. Mechanistic understanding of antibiotic resistance mediated by EnvZ/OmpR two-component system in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 2419–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lin, T.H.; Chen, Y.; Kuo, J.T.; Lai, Y.C.; Wu, C.C.; Huang, C.F.; Lin, C.T. Phosphorylated OmpR is required for type 3 fimbriae expression in Klebsiella pneumoniae under hypertonic conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meng, J.; Bai, J.Q.; Xu, J.H.; Huang, C.; Chen, J.Y. Differential regulation of physiological activities by RcsB and OmpR in Yersinia enterocolitica. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Szewzyk, U.; Holmstrom, C.; Wrangstadh, M.; Samuelsson, M.-O.; Maki, J.S.; Kjelleberg, S. Relevance of the exopolysaccharide of marine Pseudomonas sp. strain S9 for the attachment of Ciona intestinalis larvae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1991, 75, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dehio, C.; Meyer, M. Maintenance of broad-host-range incompatibility group P and group Q plasmids and transposition of Tn5 in Bartonella henselae following conjugal plasmid transfer from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 538–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zeng, Z.S.; Guo, X.P.; Li, B.Y.; Wang, P.X.; Cai, X.S.; Tian, X.P.; Zhang, S.; Yang, J.L.; Wang, X.X. Characterization of self-generated variants in Pseudoalteromonas lipolytica biofilm with increased antifouling activities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 10127–10139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, P.X.; Yu, Z.C.; Li, B.Y.; Cai, X.S.; Zeng, Z.S.; Chen, X.L.; Wang, X.X. Development of an efficient conjugation-based genetic manipulation system for Pseudoalteromonas. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2015, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 07474 g001 550
Figure 1. The deletion of the ompR gene was confirmed by PCR. M: DNA MakerIII; Wild-type in lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7; ΔompR in lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8. Lane 1 (ompR-SF/LR, 2463 bp), lane 2 (ΔompR-SF/LR, 743 bp), lane 3 (ompR-LF/SR, 2253 bp), lane 4 (ΔompR-LF/SR, 1533 bp), lane 5 (ompR-LF/LR, 3180 bp), lane 6 (ΔompR-LF/LR, 2460 bp), lane 7 (ompR-SF/SR, 1536 bp), and lane 8 (ΔompR-SF/SR, 816 bp).
Figure 1. The deletion of the ompR gene was confirmed by PCR. M: DNA MakerIII; Wild-type in lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7; ΔompR in lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8. Lane 1 (ompR-SF/LR, 2463 bp), lane 2 (ΔompR-SF/LR, 743 bp), lane 3 (ompR-LF/SR, 2253 bp), lane 4 (ΔompR-LF/SR, 1533 bp), lane 5 (ompR-LF/LR, 3180 bp), lane 6 (ΔompR-LF/LR, 2460 bp), lane 7 (ompR-SF/SR, 1536 bp), and lane 8 (ΔompR-SF/SR, 816 bp).
Ijms 24 07474 g001
Ijms 24 07474 g002 550
Figure 2. The growth ability, colony morphology (×50), and bacterial motility of wild-type and ΔompR strains. (A) Colony morphology of wild-type and ΔompR strains; (B) growth curve of wild-type and ΔompR strains (n = 3); (C) swimming motility of wild-type and ΔompR strains; and (D) migration zone diameter of wild-type and ΔompR strains. Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. The growth ability, colony morphology (×50), and bacterial motility of wild-type and ΔompR strains. (A) Colony morphology of wild-type and ΔompR strains; (B) growth curve of wild-type and ΔompR strains (n = 3); (C) swimming motility of wild-type and ΔompR strains; and (D) migration zone diameter of wild-type and ΔompR strains. Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 07474 g002
Ijms 24 07474 g003 550
Figure 3. Biofilm formation and thickness of wild-type and ΔompR strains. (A) The CLSM images of biofilms formed by the wild-type strain, ΔompR strain, and the ΔompR strain co-cultured with 10 mg L−1 recombinant OmpW protein; and (B) statistical analysis of strain biofilm thicknesses (n = 9). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Biofilm formation and thickness of wild-type and ΔompR strains. (A) The CLSM images of biofilms formed by the wild-type strain, ΔompR strain, and the ΔompR strain co-cultured with 10 mg L−1 recombinant OmpW protein; and (B) statistical analysis of strain biofilm thicknesses (n = 9). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 07474 g003
Ijms 24 07474 g004 550
Figure 4. The effect of wild-type biofilms and ΔompR biofilms on mussel settlement and the biofilm density with different initial bacterial densities. (A) Inducing activities of biofilms formed by tested strains on mussel settlement; and (B) biofilm density on glass slips with different initial bacterial densities of tested strains. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. The effect of wild-type biofilms and ΔompR biofilms on mussel settlement and the biofilm density with different initial bacterial densities. (A) Inducing activities of biofilms formed by tested strains on mussel settlement; and (B) biofilm density on glass slips with different initial bacterial densities of tested strains. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 07474 g004
Ijms 24 07474 g005 550
Figure 5. The effect of ompR gene deletion on the content of EPS in biofilms. (A) The CLSM images of EPS in wild-type biofilms, ΔompR biofilms, and biofilms formed by ΔompR co-cultured with 10 mg L−1 recombinant OmpW protein; and (B) biovolume analysis of EPS in biofilms. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The effect of ompR gene deletion on the content of EPS in biofilms. (A) The CLSM images of EPS in wild-type biofilms, ΔompR biofilms, and biofilms formed by ΔompR co-cultured with 10 mg L−1 recombinant OmpW protein; and (B) biovolume analysis of EPS in biofilms. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 07474 g005
Ijms 24 07474 g006 550
Figure 6. The difference in envZ (A) and ompW (B) gene expression, and c-di-GMP concentration (C) of experimental strains. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. The difference in envZ (A) and ompW (B) gene expression, and c-di-GMP concentration (C) of experimental strains. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 07474 g006
Ijms 24 07474 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect on the inducing activity and biofilm density of ΔompR biofilms after adding recombinant OmpW protein. (A) The effect of the inducing activities of biofilms formed by the ΔompR strain on the plantigrade settlement after the addition of different concentrations of OmpW; and (B) the biofilm density of the ΔompR biofilms on glass slips after the addition of OmpW. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Effect on the inducing activity and biofilm density of ΔompR biofilms after adding recombinant OmpW protein. (A) The effect of the inducing activities of biofilms formed by the ΔompR strain on the plantigrade settlement after the addition of different concentrations of OmpW; and (B) the biofilm density of the ΔompR biofilms on glass slips after the addition of OmpW. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 07474 g007
Table
Table 1. Strains, plasmids, and primers were used in this study.
Table 1. Strains, plasmids, and primers were used in this study.
Bacterial Strains/Plasmids/PrimersRelevant FeaturesSource
StrainsE. coli WM3064RP4 (tra) in the chromosome, DAP[52]
P. marina ECSMB14103Wild-type[5,6]
ΔompRThe deletion of the ompR mutant strainThis study
PlasmidspK18mobsacB-erypK18mobsacB with erythromycin resistance[54]
pK18mobsacB-ery-ompRRecombinant plasmid used to knock out ompR genesThis study
PrimersompR-UFCGCGGATCCCGAATGCGAGTAAGTGGTGTThis study
ompR-URCCGCTCGAGTTCCTGACGGTGAAAAGTAGThis study
ompR-DFCCGCTCGAGTTTGTCGTTTCGTGTCCCATThis study
ompR-DRACGCGTCGACCCTTTAGGGAGTGGTTGAGCThis study
ompR-SFTACCCTGAAAGCGGAATTThis study
ompR-SRGCGAACACGTCGGTCTATThis study
ompR-LFGGTTCAAATACCGACTCTAThis study
ompR-LRGATTGTTGTTTCGTGCTGTThis study
Table
Table 2. The primer sequences used in this study.
Table 2. The primer sequences used in this study.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Usage
envZ-RT-FGGTATAGCGGCCCTTGAAAART-qPCR
envZ-RT-RGATACTCGTCTTGGTCGCTCRT-qPCR
ompW-RT-FATTGATTGCTGCTACGCCRT-qPCR
ompW-RT-RCTGTGCCACTAACGAGGGRT-qPCR
gyrB-RT-FGCAGCCGAAACGCCTTCTTCTRT-qPCR
gyrB-RT-RCCGATGATGGCACAGGCTTACART-qPCR
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Hu, X.; Yang, J.-L.; Liang, X. Two-Component System Response Regulator ompR Regulates Mussel Settlement through Exopolysaccharides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087474

AMA Style

Ma W, Wang X, Zhang W, Hu X, Yang J-L, Liang X. Two-Component System Response Regulator ompR Regulates Mussel Settlement through Exopolysaccharides. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087474

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Wei, Xiaoyu Wang, Wen Zhang, Xiaomeng Hu, Jin-Long Yang, and Xiao Liang. 2023. "Two-Component System Response Regulator ompR Regulates Mussel Settlement through Exopolysaccharides" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087474

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop