Next Article in Journal
Computational Study on E-Hooks of Tubulins in the Binding Process with Kinesin
Next Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Nanoparticles and Composite Hydrogel Systems for Delivery of Peptide Antibiotics
Previous Article in Journal
PLGA-Based Composites for Various Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polycondensed Peptide Carriers Modified with Cyclic RGD Ligand for Targeted Suicide Gene Delivery to Uterine Fibroid Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms23042037
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cellulose Cryogels as Promising Materials for Biomedical Applications

by
Irina V. Tyshkunova
,
Daria N. Poshina
and
Yury A. Skorik
*
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoi VO 31, 199004 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 2037; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042037
Submission received: 20 January 2022 / Revised: 4 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 February 2022 / Published: 12 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biopolymers in Drug and Gene Delivery Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The availability, biocompatibility, non-toxicity, and ease of chemical modification make cellulose a promising natural polymer for the production of biomedical materials. Cryogelation is a relatively new and straightforward technique for producing porous light and super-macroporous cellulose materials. The production stages include dissolution of cellulose in an appropriate solvent, regeneration (coagulation) from the solution, removal of the excessive solvent, and then freezing. Subsequent freeze-drying preserves the micro- and nanostructures of the material formed during the regeneration and freezing steps. Various factors can affect the structure and properties of cellulose cryogels, including the cellulose origin, the dissolution parameters, the solvent type, and the temperature and rate of freezing, as well as the inclusion of different fillers. Adjustment of these parameters can change the morphology and properties of cellulose cryogels to impart the desired characteristics. This review discusses the structure of cellulose and its properties as a biomaterial, the strategies for cellulose dissolution, and the factors affecting the structure and properties of the formed cryogels. We focus on the advantages of the freeze-drying process, highlighting recent studies on the production and application of cellulose cryogels in biomedicine and the main cryogel quality characteristics. Finally, conclusions and prospects are presented regarding the application of cellulose cryogels in wound healing, in the regeneration of various tissues (e.g., damaged cartilage, bone tissue, and nerves), and in controlled-release drug delivery.

1. Introduction

Cryogelation is one of the newly developed protocols for the production of polysaccharide materials for biomedical purposes [1]. Polysaccharide-based cryogels form a spongy super-macroporous structure during freeze-drying, making them highly promising materials for tissue engineering [2]. The production of polysaccharide cryogels has recently become a popular approach for the development of scaffolds [3], and these matrices are readily obtained by dissolving a polysaccharide (usually cellulose) in an appropriate solvent, followed by polymer regeneration from solution (solvent removal), freezing, and freeze-drying. Figure 1 shows the scheme for producing cellulose cryogels.
At the regeneration step, the polymer passes from the dissolved state to an insoluble state, and subsequent freezing leads to ice crystal formation. The removal of the ice during freeze-drying then generates pores and leaves a cryogel with a complex three-dimensional structure [4]. The high porosity and hydrophilicity, high water retention capacity, interconnectedness of the pores, and material consistency make cryogels very similar to natural soft tissues [5], while their mechanical stability allows their use in vivo [6]. Cryogels can also stimulate the in vivo production of various natural molecules, including antibodies, and they can act as in vitro bioreactors for the expansion of cell lines and as a means of cell separation. Excellent in vivo results have been obtained using cryogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering, as cryogels can promote the resumption of growth in numerous damaged tissues [3]. However, the surface properties of tissue engineering materials affect cell affinity [1], and these properties depend on a large number of different factors, including the conditions used for polysaccharide dissolution, regeneration, and freezing.
Biocompatibility is one of the main requirements for cryogels used as scaffolds. The ideal scaffold should be porous, biodegradable, biocompatible, and bioresorbable and should not trigger an immune response or inflammation [7]. Consequently, scaffolds made from natural polymers have several advantages over those made from synthetic polymers, as natural polymers are bioresorbable and biocompatible, have low immunogenicity and cytotoxicity, and can stimulate intercellular interactions. By contrast, the degradation of synthetic polymers can generate harmful by-products and can have problems in terms of injection and infection [1]. Natural biopolymers, particularly cellulose, have therefore become very popular materials for the preparation of porous products used for biomedical purposes, such as wound healing, tissue engineering, and drug delivery [8,9].
Cellulose has found particular favor in biomedical sciences due to its mechanical strength, biocompatibility, and hydrophilicity, making it a promising polysaccharide for the production of biocompatible porous cryogels [10,11,12]. Cellulose-based materials have been proposed for a variety of biomedical applications [13,14] because, unlike other polysaccharides, cellulose is relatively bioinert and is not biodegraded in the human body. Thus, newly regenerated tissue cannot displace a cellulosic scaffold, which can be an advantage in tissue engineering. Cellulose materials have found applications in the regeneration of bone [15], neural [16], and cartilage [17] tissues, as well as in wound dressings [18]. The bioinertness of cellulose also meets the requirement that a scaffold material should not induce foreign body responses [19].
This review considers the preparation of cellulose-based cryogels using the freeze-drying technique, and presents data on the use of these cryogels for biomedical purposes. The structural features and properties of cellulose and the difficulties associated with the dissolution of cellulose are reviewed. Information on the methods for dissolving cellulose and producing cellulose cryogels is presented. The influence of various factors on the structure and properties of the produced materials is discussed, and the advantages of the freeze-drying process are analyzed. Recent studies on the production and use of cellulose cryogels for biomedical purposes are summarized, and the main quality parameters of these cryogels are presented. The current status and prospects for the use of cryogels in tissue engineering are discussed.
Previously published reviews on the biomedical application of cryogels have provided much information on various polysaccharide cryogels, but cellulose cryogels have received relatively little attention. The available reviews on cellulose cryogels contain information on production methods and the characterization of properties and morphology, without indicating possible directions for biomedical application [20,21]. Other reviews consider cellulose cryogels to be sorbents [12,22]. Reviews that focus on the biomedical applications of cryogels contain information on many polysaccharide cryogels, with little [2,3,23,24] or no mention of cellulose cryogels [1]. A review of nanocellulose sponges and their biomedical applications has been published [25]. By contrast, we present data on the use of different cellulose types (cellulose of various origins). This review is especially focused on analyzing data on cellulose cryogels obtained by freeze-drying, offering information on the use of various cellulose types for producing biomedical cryogels. The information presented starts with the structural features of cellulose and its solvents for the production of cryogels and ends with data on the biomedical applications of various cellulose cryogels.

2. Cellulose as a Source for Producing Biomedical Materials

Cellulose is a promising raw material for the production of functional biomedical materials [10]. Cellulose can be shaped in many different ways: into beads [26], fibers with a diameter from tens of nm to tens of microns [27], films (cellophane), porous foams (sponges), and aerogels [20,28,29]. The morphology and properties of these objects can be very different.
Cellulose, as a biomedical material, has certain advantages over other traditional biopolymers, including its prevalence (it can be isolated from various natural materials), availability, low toxicity, renewability, and biocompatibility, making the development of cellulose-based cryogels a promising research direction [30]. The freeze-drying of cellulose hydrogels imparts a complex heterogeneous structure to cellulose, creating useful building blocks for complex hierarchical structures [31]. Porous cellulose materials are very attractive for a variety of biomedical applications, including controlled drug release, tissue engineering scaffolds, matrices for cell growth, biosensors, and antibacterial wound dressings [12,31,32,33,34,35]. Each of these applications requires materials with a specific morphology, pore size distribution, specific surface area, and material density. However, the complex supramolecular structure of cellulose creates difficulties in its dissolution and processing into biomedical products.
Cellulose consists of anhydroglucose units (C6H10O5) linked by β-glycosidic (1 → 4) bonds and has a high crystalline content [36]. The hydroxyl groups in the cellulose macromolecule are involved in intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Figure 2b), which lead to the formation of various ordered crystal structures.
Crystalline allomorphs of cellulose I, II, III, and IV are distinguished according to their X-ray diffractometry and solid-state 13C NMR spectra. Cellulose I, the most abundant form in nature, is a crystalline native cellulose, whereas cellulose II is obtained by mercerization (alkaline treatment) or regeneration (solubilization and subsequent recrystallization) (Figure 2c). Celluloses IIII and IIIII can be formed from celluloses I and II, respectively, by treatment with liquid ammonia, and the reaction is reversible [38]. Cellulose IVI and IVII can be obtained by heating celluloses IIII and IIIII, respectively [39]. Lightweight porous materials can be obtained from celluloses I or II [12], but most research has focused on cellulose I. The crystalline structure of cellulose I is a mixture of two different crystalline forms: cellulose Iα (triclinic) and Iβ (monoclinic) (Figure 2a) [40]. The relative amounts of cellulose Iα and Iβ vary depending on the cellulose source (for example, the Iβ form is dominant in higher plants, whereas the Iα form is typically found in algae and bacteria). Cellulose crystallites are usually about 5 nm wide; however, these crystallites are imperfect, and part of the cellulose structure is less ordered, termed amorphous. The traditional two-phase cellulose model describes cellulose chains containing both crystalline (ordered) and amorphous (less ordered) regions [41].
This added complexity of the supramolecular structure of cellulose creates difficulties in its dissolution and processing. Typical cellulose solvents include 7–9% aqueous NaOH [26,42,43], Cu-ethylenediamine (or Cd-ethylenediamine) complexes [44], LiCl/dimethylacetamide (DMAc) [45], N-methyl-morpholine-N-oxide monohydrate [46,47,48,49], molten salt hydrates, and ionic liquids [50,51,52,53] (Table 1).
However, most of these are toxic, have only limited ability to dissolve high molecular weight cellulose, and are difficult to remove from the final product [55]. The processing steps required for dissolution, gelation, and solvent removal for cellulose cryogel formation are very slow and can take several days [56]. However, one advantage of the insolubility of cellulose in water and typical organic liquids is that, with proper reinforcement, the structure of lightweight cellulose materials can be retained when they are immersed in most liquids [57].
Interest in porous biomedical materials continues to grow, as evidenced by the number of publications each year [2,58,59,60]. Cellulose is a promising raw material for the production of cryogels.

3. Advantages of Freeze-Drying and Factors Affecting the Structure and Properties of Cryogels

Freeze-drying allows the preservation of the micro- and nanostructure of the material and the generation of a large specific surface area (up to 300 m2/g) in the dried state [14,61]. One advantage of freeze-drying is that it has no requirement for the use of flammable liquids (e.g., ethanol/acetone that are required for supercritical drying, which also allows preservation of the nanostructure of the material); another is that the structure of the resulting material corresponds to the structure of the frozen dispersion [62]. Ice crystals formed during the freezing of the dispersion change the distribution of particles, and subsequent drying creates pores where the ice crystals had formed [63]. The morphology of the materials obtained by freeze-drying can vary from random networks to lamellar solid structures. These different types of network structures can produce equally lightweight materials; therefore, they can be easily designed and produced with environmental friendliness and safety in mind.
The final properties of a cryogel, including its biocompatibility, mechanical, and thermal properties, and degradability, depend on many factors (Figure 3).
The chemical composition of the cryogel is probably the most important factor, since it determines the biocompatibility and degradability of the cryogel and, to some extent, affects the mechanical and thermal properties of the cryogel. The porosity and degree of crosslinking mainly affect the mechanical properties, while crosslinking itself affects the biocompatibility and degradability of the cryogel [2]. The pore size, wall thickness, and density affect the properties of cryogels [64], as thicker and higher-density walls improve their mechanical properties. The thickness and density, in turn, depend on the concentration of the polymer and the type of crosslinking in the cryogel.
The production processes used to form the cryogels also affect their structure. For example, an increase in the freezing rate or a decrease in the cryogelation temperature decreases the cryogel pore size because the solvent freezes at a higher rate, allowing for the growth of only a small number of ice crystals [65,66]. Further, a temperature gradient occurs during cryogelation, which leads to a non-uniform pore size distribution [67]. Initially, the external part of the sample is exposed to a low temperature, which leads to an increase in the freezing rate and a smaller pore size than that subsequently formed in the internal cryogel material. However, this heterogeneous pore size distribution is not an obstacle to the use of cryogels in tissue engineering, since many tissues of the human body also have heterogeneous morphology [68]. Cryostructuring, including directional freezing of cryogels, has been used to achieve varying degrees of porosity (45–75%, pore size 70–85 nm) or to equalize the porosity or anisotropy within cryogels [60].
The mechanical properties of cryogels are commonly evaluated using compression testing [3]. Reducing the pore size of cryogels has been reported to increase compressive strength [69], whereas increasing porosity increases the compressive deformation of the cryogel [70]. For one type of cryogel (injection cryogels), low compression deformation is undesirable; their ideal porosity is 91% [67].
Cryogels used in biomedical applications may require that the material eventually degrade within the body, but cryogels still need to perform their functions before this degradation occurs. Therefore, knowledge of the changes in the mechanical properties of cryogels throughout their degradation would be useful [71]. The thickness of the cryogel walls is assumed to decrease during enzymatic degradation, and in some cases, the walls are destroyed. Whether this process occurs for cryogels degraded by other mechanisms (e.g., by cleavage of disulfides [72] or chemical hydrolysis [59]) is unclear. The degradation of cryogels leads to an increase in pore size, possibly due to thinning of the pore walls and a decrease in crosslinking [73]. The mechanical properties of degraded cryogels are largely overlooked in the current literature, despite their importance for applications such as scaffold materials [71]. Due to their non-biodegradability in the human body, the main application areas of cellulose materials are bone tissue regeneration (bone implants) [15,66,67] and the production of wound dressings [18].
The following sections provide a more detailed description of some of the variables that affect the structure and properties of cryogels: the type and degree of crosslinking, the concentration and molecular weight of the polymer, the parameters of gelation and cryoconcentration, and the effects of capillary forces, temperature, and freezing rate.

3.1. Type and Degree of Crosslinking

Crosslinking can provide better mechanical performance and integrity for cellulose cryogels. The type of crosslinking affects the rigidity and degree of swelling, which in turn affects the elastic and mechanical properties and pore size of the cryogel. Methods for cryogel formation include chemical crosslinking and physical gel formation using natural or synthetic polymers [65]. Chemical crosslinking occurs during the storage of the polymer solution at a given temperature, whereas physical crosslinking occurs during the thawing step, where faster thawing results in weaker gels [6]. Physical crosslinking generates cryogels with pore sizes of less than 10 µm [74,75,76,77], whereas chemical crosslinking allows for cryogels with large pore sizes of 80–200 µm [28,68,72]. One hypothesis to explain the difference in structure formation during physical and chemical gelation of cellulose is that, during physical gelation, the chains self-associate to form a heterogeneous network with “thick” walls and pores of different sizes. By contrast, during chemical gelation, chemical bonds act as separators between the chains, thereby breaking their self-association and preventing packaging. The result is a more uniform chemical network with higher swelling and transparency when wet and lower density when dry [33].
The degree of crosslinking (i.e., the ratio of monomer to crosslinking agent) in a chemically crosslinked cryogel affects its mechanical properties. Chemical crosslinking can provide good mechanical properties; however, the compounds used as crosslinkers are often toxic, difficult to remove, and not biocompatible [78]. The effect of the amount of the crosslinking agent on the mechanical properties of cellulose cryogels is debatable, as some data show an increase in the compressive modulus with an increase in the crosslinking agent concentration [79], whereas other studies indicate an increase in the storage modulus for cellulose cryogels from 45 to 675 Pa with a decrease in the crosslinking agent concentration [80]. An increase in the crosslinking agent concentration (epichlorohydrin) also results in the formation of an inhomogeneous structure of the cellulose cryogel, whereas dense areas are observed when the pore size is 200 μm [33].
The degree of crosslinking in physically crosslinked cryogels is controlled by changing the number of freeze-thaw cycles [2]. Physical crosslinking does not use any organic solvents or toxic crosslinking agents, thereby eliminating any danger of residues in the final material and making this method very promising for biomedical applications [78]. Physical crosslinking is also easier, and this translates into cost savings. The problem with physical methods is obtaining satisfactory properties without any chemical modification while maintaining biocompatibility, biodegradability, and bioactivity [78]. However, according to some data, compared to their chemically crosslinked counterparts, physically crosslinked cryogels demonstrate greater mechanical strength [81] and crystallinity (cellulose cryogels) [33].

3.2. Concentration and Molecular Weight of the Polymer

A minimum (critical) concentration of cellulose is required to retain the integrity (shape) of the produced cryogel (i.e., to retain the integrity of the network after removing the liquid phase) [22,77,78]. This critical concentration is probably related to percolation within the precursor network [82,83], where overlap or interaction between cellulose chains results in the formation of an autonomous network [34]. At a concentration below the critical value, the network is unstable, and shrinkage increases with decreasing cellulose concentration [83]. A cellulose concentration of more than 3% in solution is required to obtain cryogels, as studies have shown that cryogels do not form at concentrations of less than 3% [28,54]. The critical concentration of the polymer also affects the mechanical properties of the produced cryogels [84].
Solutions with high polymer concentrations produce cryogels with small average pore sizes. This is due to an increase in the availability of crosslinked groups and a decrease in the availability of free water. As with conventional hydrogel formation, increasing the polymer content increases the rigidity of the cryogels. An increase in the polymer concentration also leads to a decrease in porosity and swelling of the cryogel [54,85], while decreasing the degradation rate [85].
The molecular weight of the polymer affects the structure of the cryogel. The use of polymer solutions with a lower molecular weight at the same mass concentration in a gel solution leads to the formation of larger pores compared to the use of gel solutions of polymers with a higher molecular weight [24,54,83]. Higher molecular weight polymer solutions will generate smaller pores due to the relatively smaller volume of free water that can form ice crystals in the solution. Similar observations were recorded when producing cryogels based on cellulose with various degrees of polymerization [21] compared to the concentrations of other polymers (gelatin) in a gel solution [86,87].
An increase in the degree of cellulose polymerization leads to an increase in the undissolved fraction in the solution, which reduces the content of dissolved cellulose in the matrix solution. This leads to the formation of voids in the dry matter [20]. Thus, the incomplete dissolution of cellulose with a high degree of polymerization and an increase in material heterogeneity will worsen the mechanical properties of the final cellulose composites.

3.3. Gelation and Cryoconcentration Parameters

The temperature and dissolution time (gelation) of the polymer affect the cryogel structure and properties. These parameters are typically set to values that provide the best structure and properties for each cryogel. For example, the optimal dissolution time is 24 h at room temperature for microcrystalline cellulose [54] and 16 h at room temperature for chitin [88]. An optimum temperature also exists for gelation and cryogelation for maximization of the pore size [89]. The effect of the gelation and crystallization rate of the solution on the physical properties of cryogels therefore becomes important.
To obtain a macroporous structure of cryogel by cryogelation, the gel solution must first partially crystallize to form solidified solvent crystals (pore-forming agents). This can be complicated by the action of hydrogel components that lower the freezing point of the solution (the “freezing point lowering effect”) and by the effects of supercooling. To obtain a homogeneous macroporous hydrogel, the crosslinking rate of the polymer must be lower than the crystallization rate of the solvent [90]. If crosslinking occurs faster than the solvent can crystallize, a non-macroporous gel will form. Conversely, larger pores can be formed by reducing the crosslinking rate (the formation and growth of crystal pore-forming agents). The inhibitory effect of supercooling during solvent crystallization can be overcome by increasing the cooling rate. This increase leads to the formation of smaller [91] or even irregular pores [92], depending on the extent of the increase in the cooling rate.
The cryoconcentration of components in the liquid phase also affects the process of cryogel formation. For example, cryoconcentration lowers the critical concentration required for gelation, thereby allowing gel solutions with low monomer content that would not normally set at room temperature to set under cryo-conditions. Cryoconcentration can also speed up the gelation process [6]. The effect of cryoconcentration on the mechanical properties of the cryogel is of interest, given that the compaction of the polymer in the pore walls significantly increases local mechanical properties, such as elasticity.

3.4. Capillary Forces

The capillary forces between the particles of a porous material affect its density. A decrease in capillary forces decreases the density of the material, resulting in lighter materials [93]. Freeze-drying avoids capillary forces; for example, freezing at −18 °C and subsequent freeze-drying produced the lightest cellulose material (density 0.0002 g/cm3) from a 0.1% cellulose nanofibril hydrogel [94]. The cooling rate is lower for this type of freezing (−18 °C) than when liquid nitrogen is used for freezing. This promotes the growth of ice crystals and produces a material of lower density [83,94].

3.5. Freezing Parameters

The freezing temperature affects the cryogel morphology and can result in the formation of a lamellar structure and highly porous gels with preserved micro- and nanostructure [61]. Smaller pores can be formed by lowering the temperature [95]. At lower temperatures, the solvent crystallizes more rapidly, resulting in the formation of smaller solvent crystals (pore-forming agents). However, due to the increased crystallization of the solvent, the liquid microphase becomes more concentrated, which leads to the formation of thinner and denser pore walls. A 15 °C decrease in the freezing point has been shown to cause a decrease in the pore diameter of polyacrylamide cryogels by an average of 30 μm [96]. By contrast, the pore sizes of cryogels based on polyvinyl alcohol, laminin, or gelatin crosslinked with glutaraldehyde were unaffected by the freezing point [65]. Freezing at −20 °C resulted in the formation of lamellar structures with few pores. A decrease in the pre-freezing temperature to −80 °C and −196 °C led to the appearance of more porous structures. In general, a lower pre-freezing temperature produces a more porous and less agglomerated cryogel structure [95].
Rapid cooling of the dispersion is effective for producing numerous and small ice crystals and leads to the formation of small pores (hence, a high specific surface area) [83,97]. The effects of temperature and freezing rate have been demonstrated on cellulose cryogels [98] cooled at −68 °C and −40 °C. Smaller pore sizes were obtained at the lower temperature (−68 °C) due to the higher cooling rate. Cryogels with the highest specific surface area of 201 m2/g (i.e., the smallest pore size) were obtained at −196 °C [98]. The opposite approach (a low cooling rate) is used to increase the lightness of the cryogel [98]. Optimum freezing conditions can be determined by the initial crystallization temperature of the solvent and the freezing point for each polymer solution [99].
The structure of the cryogel will also be influenced by the type of cellulose solvent and the inclusion of various fillers or additives. Cryogel scaffolds often have more than one component and can consist of mixtures of two or more polymers or composites. Composite cryogels can be produced using both polymers and additives (nanoparticles and fibers) to obtain a material with improved physical, chemical, and biological properties. These cryogels can combine the beneficial properties of each component [59]. For example, cryogels of carrageenan/cellulose nanofibrils as carriers of antimicrobial α-aminophosphonate derivatives were produced by crosslinking with glyoxal. Cellulose nanofibrils significantly strengthened the composite material, improving its mechanical properties. Scaffolds of this material have been proposed for use as antimicrobial wound-healing materials and have been shown to be effective against Staphylococcus aureus infection [100].
Composite nanocellulose/gelatin cryogels with controlled porosity and network structure and good biocompatibility were obtained by chemical crosslinking of dialdehyde starch and subsequently used as carriers for the controlled release of 5-fluorouracil [101]. An increase in nanocellulose content (from 0.5 to 5 parts relative to gelatin) increased the specific surface area and porosity of the composite cryogel. The swelling coefficients first increased and then decreased with an increase in the nanocellulose content. Increasing the nanocellulose content resulted in improved drug loading and crosslinking rates.
The next section provides information on a variety of cellulose cryogels and cellulose-based composite cryogels produced using different solvents. The quality characteristics of the produced cryogels and their applications for biomedical purposes are presented.

4. Cellulose-Based Cryogels and Their Applications in Biomedicine

Cellulose cryogels, as a new generation of porous materials, are of great interest in tissue engineering, as they offer new solutions and improve existing systems and procedures [3]. In addition to their high porosity and mechanical strength, cellulose cryogels can be modified to enhance the attachment of certain other materials (e.g., extracellular matrix proteins, cultured cells, or chemicals) that can promote cell immobilization and growth [102,103] on cryogel scaffolds. Table 2 provides data on cellulose-based cryogels obtained by freeze-drying using various solvents and includes the main characteristics of the cryogels and the possible directions of their biomedical applications (Table 2).
The use of various solvents and cellulose dissolution techniques has produced cryogels with suitable properties, morphology, and mechanics for biomedical applications. Further, cellulose-based cryogels have shown good sorption properties; for example, keratin/cellulose cryogels have been successfully fabricated for the adsorption of oil/solvent [115]. Highly porous (more than 90%) and ultra-light (density less than 0.035 g/cm3) cellulose/biochar cryogels have also shown high sorption capacities. The addition of 5% biochar to a cellulose cryogel yielded the highest sorption capacity, at 73 g/g of petroleum [116]. Cryogels formed from hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and bacterial cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) have shown good adsorption of organic pollutants [117]. Shapable cellulose nanofiber/alginate cryogels with underwater super-elasticity have been used for protein purification [118]. Highly porous (94.7–97.1%) light (density 0.016–0.028 g/cm3) hydrophobic cellulose cryogels (unbleached long fiber of Pinus elliottii) have shown a high homogeneous sorption capacity (65.18 g/g) and heterogeneous sorption capacity (68.42 g/g) (solvent organosilane methyltrimethoxysilane) [119]. Thus, cellulose cryogels can be produced with different microstructures and properties, and varying the conditions of cellulose dissolution and the parameters for producing cryogels can result in cryogels with many different desirable qualities.

5. Conclusions

Due to the advantages of the freeze-drying method, interest is growing in the production of polysaccharide-based porous materials by cryogelation. The use of natural polymers for the production of cryogels, in contrast to synthetic polymers, makes it possible to create biocompatible medical materials (scaffolds) with a minimal immune response. Cellulose, due to its availability, renewability, non-toxicity, and biocompatibility, is a promising raw material for producing cryogels for biomedical applications. The production of cellulose cryogels by freeze-drying is a promising and steadily developing direction in tissue engineering. Cellulose cryogels have unique properties imparted by their interconnected super-macroporous structure and mechanical stability that make them attractive materials for a variety of applications. Much research has focused on the development of cellulose cryogels for tissue engineering. The results show that cellulose cryogels are promising tools and are applicable as scaffolds for various tissue types.
Physical and chemical parameters affect the formation of cryogels, such as the origin of the cellulose, dissolution parameters, type of solvent, temperature, freezing rate, and the inclusion of various fillers. Varying the parameters of cellulose dissolution, production technology, and freezing can change the properties of the cryogels and set the desired final characteristics of the product. Due to its complex supramolecular structure, cellulose is difficult to dissolve. Thus, an important task remains the selection of a cellulose solvent that can be easily removed from the final product prior to its use for biomedical purposes. The production of composite cryogels is promising for imparting additional properties to the cryogel (changes in morphology and mechanical properties). An important direction for research in the field of cryogels is the preservation of the properties of cryogels during their use. Cellulose cryogels have huge potential in the repair and regeneration of various tissue types, including cartilage tissue, bone tissue, and nerves, in wound healing, and in the delivery of controlled release drugs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.V.T. and Y.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, I.V.T. and D.N.P.; writing—review and editing, Y.A.S.; funding acquisition, I.V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

I.V.T. was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 19-33-60014).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bakhshpour, M.; Idil, N.; Perçin, I.; Denizli, A. Biomedical applications of polymeric cryogels. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jones, L.O.; Williams, L.; Boam, T.; Kalmet, M.; Oguike, C.; Hatton, F.L. Cryogels: Recent applications in 3D-bioprinting, injectable cryogels, drug delivery, and wound healing. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 2553–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hixon, K.R.; Lu, T.; Sell, S.A. A comprehensive review of cryogels and their roles in tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomaterialia 2017, 62, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arvidsson, P.; Plieva, F.M.; Lozinsky, V.I.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. Direct chromatographic capture of enzyme from crude homogenate using immobilized metal affinity chromatography on a continuous supermacroporous adsorbent. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 986, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, P.; Chen, W.; Bai, S.; Wang, Q.; Duan, W. Facile preparation of poly (vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide nanocomposites and their foaming behavior in supercritical carbon dioxide. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 107, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lozinsky, V.I.; Plieva, F.M.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. The potential of polymeric cryogels in bioseparation. Bioseparation 2001, 10, 163–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kemençe, N.; Bölgen, N. Gelatin-and hydroxyapatite-based cryogels for bone tissue engineering: Synthesis, characterization, in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2017, 11, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, S.; Malfait, W.J.; Guerrero-Alburquerque, N.; Koebel, M.M.; Nyström, G. Biopolymer aerogels and foams: Chemistry, properties, and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7580–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Surya, I.; Olaiya, N.; Rizal, S.; Zein, I.; Sri Aprilia, N.; Hasan, M.; Yahya, E.B.; Sadasivuni, K.; Abdul Khalil, H. Plasticizer enhancement on the miscibility and thermomechanical properties of polylactic acid-chitin-starch composites. Polymers 2020, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Klemm, D.; Heublein, B.; Fink, H.P.; Bohn, A. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3358–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bajpai, S.; Swarnkar, M. New semi-ipn hydrogels based on cellulose for biomedical application. J. Polym. 2014, 2014, 376754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ferreira, E.S.; Rezende, C.A.; Cranston, E.D. Fundamentals of cellulose lightweight materials: Bio-based assemblies with tailored properties. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 3542–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jorfi, M.; Foster, E.J. Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nemoto, J.; Saito, T.; Isogai, A. Simple freeze-drying procedure for producing nanocellulose aerogel-containing, high-performance air filters. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 19809–19815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Courtenay, J.C.; Filgueiras, J.G.; Deazevedo, E.R.; Jin, Y.; Edler, K.J.; Sharma, R.I.; Scott, J.L. Mechanically robust cationic cellulose nanofibril 3D scaffolds with tuneable biomimetic porosity for cell culture. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Béduer, A.; Braschler, T.; Peric, O.; Fantner, G.E.; Mosser, S.; Fraering, P.C.; Benchérif, S.; Mooney, D.J.; Renaud, P. A compressible scaffold for minimally invasive delivery of large intact neuronal networks. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015, 4, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Naseri, N.; Poirier, J.-M.; Girandon, L.; Fröhlich, M.; Oksman, K.; Mathew, A.P. 3-dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: Tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 5999–6007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lu, T.; Li, Q.; Chen, W.; Yu, H. Composite aerogels based on dialdehyde nanocellulose and collagen for potential applications as wound dressing and tissue engineering scaffold. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 94, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hickey, R.J.; Pelling, A.E. Cellulose biomaterials for tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Korhonen, O.; Budtova, T. All-cellulose composite aerogels and cryogels. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2020, 137, 106027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buchtová, N.; Pradille, C.; Bouvard, J.-L.; Budtova, T. Mechanical properties of cellulose aerogels and cryogels. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 7901–7908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Baimenov, A.; Berillo, D.A.; Poulopoulos, S.G.; Inglezakis, V.J. A review of cryogels synthesis, characterization and applications on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 276, 102088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Eggermont, L.J.; Rogers, Z.J.; Colombani, T.; Memic, A.; Bencherif, S.A. Injectable cryogels for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 418–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Memic, A.; Colombani, T.; Eggermont, L.J.; Rezaeeyazdi, M.; Steingold, J.; Rogers, Z.J.; Navare, K.J.; Mohammed, H.S.; Bencherif, S.A. Latest advances in cryogel technology for biomedical applications. Adv. Ther. 2019, 2, 1800114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ferreira, F.V.; Otoni, C.G.; Kevin, J.; Barud, H.S.; Lona, L.M.; Cranston, E.D.; Rojas, O.J. Porous nanocellulose gels and foams: Breakthrough status in the development of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today 2020, 37, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Trygg, J.; Fardim, P.; Gericke, M.; Mäkilä, E.; Salonen, J. Physicochemical design of the morphology and ultrastructure of cellulose beads. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 93, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pääkkö, M.; Vapaavuori, J.; Silvennoinen, R.; Kosonen, H.; Ankerfors, M.; Lindström, T.; Berglund, L.A.; Ikkala, O. Long and entangled native cellulose i nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically porous templates for functionalities. Soft Matter 2008, 4, 2492–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buchtova, N.; Budtova, T. Cellulose aero-, cryo-and xerogels: Towards understanding of morphology control. Cellulose 2016, 23, 2585–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saylan, Y.; Denizli, A. Supermacroporous composite cryogels in biomedical applications. Gels 2019, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dong, H.; Xie, Y.; Zeng, G.; Tang, L.; Liang, J.; He, Q.; Zhao, F.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, Y. The dual effects of carboxymethyl cellulose on the colloidal stability and toxicity of nanoscale zero-valent iron. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 1682–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ganesan, K.; Dennstedt, A.; Barowski, A.; Ratke, L. Design of aerogels, cryogels and xerogels of cellulose with hierarchical porous structures. Mater. Des. 2016, 92, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. García-González, C.; Alnaief, M.; Smirnova, I. Polysaccharide-based aerogels—Promising biodegradable carriers for drug delivery systems. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1425–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ciolacu, D.; Rudaz, C.; Vasilescu, M.; Budtova, T. Physically and chemically cross-linked cellulose cryogels: Structure, properties and application for controlled release. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 151, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Budtova, T. Cellulose ii aerogels: A review. Cellulose 2019, 26, 81–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdul Khalil, H.; Adnan, A.; Yahya, E.B.; Olaiya, N.; Safrida, S.; Hossain, M.; Balakrishnan, V.; Gopakumar, D.A.; Abdullah, C.; Oyekanmi, A. A review on plant cellulose nanofibre-based aerogels for biomedical applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Klemm, D.; Philpp, B.; Heinze, T.; Heinze, U.; Wagenknecht, W. Comprehensive Cellulose Chemistry: Fundamentals and Analytical Methods; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  37. Koyama, M.; Helbert, W.; Imai, T.; Sugiyama, J.; Henrissat, B. Parallel-up structure evidences the molecular directionality during biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 9091–9095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hayashi, J.; Sufoka, A.; Ohkita, J.; Watanabe, S. The confirmation of existences of cellulose iiii, iiiii, ivi, and ivii by the X-ray method. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed. 1975, 13, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gardiner, E.S.; Sarko, A. Packing analysis of carbohydrates and polysaccharides. 16. The crystal structures of celluloses ivi and ivii. Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Atalla, R.H.; Vanderhart, D.L. Native cellulose: A composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984, 223, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nisizawa, K. Mode of action of cellulases. J. Ferment. Technol. 1973, 51, 267–304. [Google Scholar]
  42. Budtova, T.; Navard, P. Cellulose in naoh–water based solvents: A review. Cellulose 2016, 23, 5–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Roy, C.; Budtova, T.; Navard, P. Rheological properties and gelation of aqueous cellulose−Naoh solutions. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Heinze, T.; Koschella, A. Solvents applied in the field of cellulose chemistry: A mini review. Polímeros 2005, 15, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Henniges, U.; Schiehser, S.; Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A. Cellulose solubility: Dissolution and analysis of ‘‘problematic’’cellulose pulps in the solvent system DMAc/LiCl. ACS Symp. Ser. 2010, 1033, 165–177. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A.; Adorjan, I.; Hofinger, A.; Sixta, H.; Firgo, H.; Kosma, P. Cellulose solutions in n-methylmorpholine-n-oxide (nmmo)–degradation processes and stabilizers. Cellulose 2002, 9, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rosenau, T.; Potthast, A.; Sixta, H.; Kosma, P. The chemistry of side reactions and byproduct formation in the system nmmo/cellulose (lyocell process). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2001, 26, 1763–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rosenau, T.; French, A.D. N-methylmorpholine-n-oxide (nmmo): Hazards in practice and pitfalls in theory. Cellulose 2021, 28, 5985–5990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cuissinat, C.; Navard, P. Swelling and dissolution of cellulose part 1: Free floating cotton and wood fibres in n-methylmorpholine-n-oxide–water mixtures. Macromol. Symp. 2006, 244, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hermanutz, F.; Gähr, F.; Uerdingen, E.; Meister, F.; Kosan, B. New developments in dissolving and processing of cellulose in ionic liquids. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 262, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, H.; Gurau, G.; Rogers, R.D. Ionic liquid processing of cellulose. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1519–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pircher, N.; Carbajal, L.; Schimper, C.; Bacher, M.; Rennhofer, H.; Nedelec, J.-M.; Lichtenegger, H.C.; Rosenau, T.; Liebner, F. Impact of selected solvent systems on the pore and solid structure of cellulose aerogels. Cellulose 2016, 23, 1949–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; He, J.; Zhang, J. Application of ionic liquids for dissolving cellulose and fabricating cellulose-based materials: State of the art and future trends. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tyshkunova, I.V.; Chukhchin, D.G.; Gofman, I.V.; Poshina, D.N.; Skorik, Y.A. Cellulose cryogels prepared by regeneration from phosphoric acid solutions. Cellulose 2021, 28, 4975–4989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Egal, M.; Budtova, T.; Navard, P. Structure of aqueous solutions of microcrystalline cellulose/sodium hydroxide below 0 c and the limit of cellulose dissolution. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sehaqui, H.; Zhou, Q.; Berglund, L.A. High-porosity aerogels of high specific surface area prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose (nfc). Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 1593–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Medronho, B.; Romano, A.; Miguel, M.G.; Stigsson, L.; Lindman, B. Rationalizing cellulose (in) solubility: Reviewing basic physicochemical aspects and role of hydrophobic interactions. Cellulose 2012, 19, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yahya, E.B.; Alzalouk, M.M.; Alfallous, K.A.; Abogmaza, A.F. Antibacterial cellulose-based aerogels for wound healing application: A review. Biomed. Res. Ther. 2020, 7, 4032–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Savina, I.N.; Zoughaib, M.; Yergeshov, A.A. Design and assessment of biodegradable macroporous cryogels as advanced tissue engineering and drug carrying materials. Gels 2021, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shiekh, P.A.; Andrabi, S.M.; Singh, A.; Majumder, S.; Kumar, A. Designing cryogels through cryostructuring of polymeric matrices for biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 144, 110234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Beaumont, M.; König, J.; Opietnik, M.; Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T. Drying of a cellulose ii gel: Effect of physical modification and redispersibility in water. Cellulose 2017, 24, 1199–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Haseley, P.; Oetjen, G.-W. Freeze-Drying, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Newark, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sehaqui, H.; Salajková, M.; Zhou, Q.; Berglund, L.A. Mechanical performance tailoring of tough ultra-high porosity foams prepared from cellulose i nanofiber suspensions. Soft Matter 2010, 6, 1824–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Plieva, F.M.; Karlsson, M.; Aguilar, M.-R.; Gomez, D.; Mikhalovsky, S.; Galaev, I.Y. Pore structure in supermacroporous polyacrylamide based cryogels. Soft Matter 2005, 1, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Henderson, T.M.; Ladewig, K.; Haylock, D.N.; McLean, K.M.; O’Connor, A.J. Cryogels for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2682–2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Okay, O. Polymeric Cryogels: Macroporous Gels with Remarkable Properties; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 263. [Google Scholar]
  67. Koshy, S.T.; Ferrante, T.C.; Lewin, S.A.; Mooney, D.J. Injectable, porous, and cell-responsive gelatin cryogels. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 2477–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Mackova, H.; Plichta, Z.k.; Hlidkova, H.; Sedláček, O.; Konefal, R.; Sadakbayeva, Z.; Duskova-Smrckova, M.; Horak, D.; Kubinova, S. Reductively degradable poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels with oriented porosity for tissue engineering applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 10544–10553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bölgen, N.; Plieva, F.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B.; Pişkin, E. Cryogelation for preparation of novel biodegradable tissue-engineering scaffolds. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2007, 18, 1165–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dispinar, T.; Van Camp, W.; De Cock, L.J.; De Geest, B.G.; Du Prez, F.E. Redox-responsive degradable peg cryogels as potential cell scaffolds in tissue engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2012, 12, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Zhang, H.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, W. Control of scaffold degradation in tissue engineering: A review. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2014, 20, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Petrov, P.D.; Tsvetanov, C.B. Cryogels via uv irradiation. Polym. Cryogels 2014, 263, 199–222. [Google Scholar]
  73. Meena, L.K.; Raval, P.; Kedaria, D.; Vasita, R. Study of locust bean gum reinforced cyst-chitosan and oxidized dextran based semi-ipn cryogel dressing for hemostatic application. Bioact. Mater. 2018, 3, 370–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Plieva, F.M.; Karlsson, M.; Aguilar, M.R.; Gomez, D.; Mikhalovsky, S.; Galaev, I.Y.; Mattiasson, B. Pore structure of macroporous monolithic cryogels prepared from poly (vinyl alcohol). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 1057–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vrana, N.E.; Cahill, P.A.; McGuinness, G.B. Endothelialization of pva/gelatin cryogels for vascular tissue engineering: Effect of disturbed shear stress conditions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 94, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bernhardt, A.; Despang, F.; Lode, A.; Demmler, A.; Hanke, T.; Gelinsky, M. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on alginate–gelatine–hydroxyapatite scaffolds with anisotropic pore structure. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2009, 3, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Beluns, S.; Gaidukovs, S.; Platnieks, O.; Gaidukova, G.; Mierina, I.; Grase, L.; Starkova, O.; Brazdausks, P.; Thakur, V.K. From wood and hemp biomass wastes to sustainable nanocellulose foams. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Wu, J. Physically crosslinked hydrogels from polysaccharides prepared by freeze–thaw technique. React. Funct. Polym. 2013, 73, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Qin, X.; Lu, A.; Zhang, L. Gelation behavior of cellulose in naoh/urea aqueous system via cross-linking. Cellulose 2013, 20, 1669–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chang, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, L.; Kennedy, J.F. Structure and properties of hydrogels prepared from cellulose in naoh/urea aqueous solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bagri, L.; Bajpai, J.; Bajpai, A. Cryogenic designing of biocompatible blends of polyvinyl alcohol and starch with macroporous architecture. J. Macromol. Sci.® Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 46, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heath, L.; Thielemans, W. Cellulose nanowhisker aerogels. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1448–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Martoïa, F.; Cochereau, T.; Dumont, P.J.; Orgéas, L.; Terrien, M.; Belgacem, M. Cellulose nanofibril foams: Links between ice-templating conditions, microstructures and mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 2016, 104, 376–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Teraoka, I. Polymer Solutions: An Introduction to Physical Properties; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ceylan, S.; Demir, D.; Gül, G.; Bölgen, N. Effect of polymer concentration in cryogelation of gelatin and poly (vinyl alcohol) scaffolds. Biomater. Biomech. Bioeng. 2019, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  86. Tripathi, A.; Kathuria, N.; Kumar, A. Elastic and macroporous agarose–gelatin cryogels with isotropic and anisotropic porosity for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A Off. J. Soc. Biomater. Jpn. Soc. Biomater. Aust. Soc. Biomater. Korean Soc. Biomater. 2009, 90, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Van Vlierberghe, S.; Dubruel, P.; Lippens, E.; Cornelissen, M.; Schacht, E. Correlation between cryogenic parameters and physico-chemical properties of porous gelatin cryogels. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2009, 20, 1417–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tyshkunova, I.V.; Chukhchin, D.G.; Gofman, I.V.; Pavlova, E.N.; Ushakov, V.A.; Vlasova, E.N.; Poshina, D.N.; Skorik, Y.A. Chitin cryogels prepared by regeneration from phosphoric acid solutions. Materials 2021, 14, 5191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dinu, M.V.; Ozmen, M.M.; Dragan, E.S.; Okay, O. Freezing as a path to build macroporous structures: Superfast responsive polyacrylamide hydrogels. Polymer 2007, 48, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hwang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Varghese, S. Poly (ethylene glycol) cryogels as potential cell scaffolds: Effect of polymerization conditions on cryogel microstructure and properties. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gang, E.J.; Jeong, J.A.; Hong, S.H.; Hwang, S.H.; Kim, S.W.; Yang, I.H.; Ahn, C.; Han, H.; Kim, H. Skeletal myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 2004, 22, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Ozmen, M.M.; Dinu, M.V.; Dragan, E.S.; Okay, O. Preparation of macroporous acrylamide-based hydrogels: Cryogelation under isothermal conditions. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 44, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Erlandsson, J.; Pettersson, T.; Ingverud, T.; Granberg, H.; Larsson, P.A.; Malkoch, M.; Wågberg, L. On the mechanism behind freezing-induced chemical crosslinking in ice-templated cellulose nanofibril aerogels. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 19371–19380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Chen, W.; Yu, H.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, J. Ultralight and highly flexible aerogels with long cellulose i nanofibers. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 10360–10368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lozinsky, V.; Vainerman, E.; Ivanova, S.; Titova, E.; Shtil’man, M.; Belavtseva, E.; Rogozhin, S. Study of cryostructurization of polymer systems. Vi. The influence of the process temperature on the dynamics of formation and structure of cross-linked polyacrylamide cryogels. Acta Polym. 1986, 37, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ivanov, R.V.; Lozinsky, V.I.; Noh, S.K.; Lee, Y.R.; Han, S.S.; Lyoo, W.S. Preparation and characterization of polyacrylamide cryogels produced from a high-molecular-weight precursor. Ii. The influence of the molecular weight of the polymeric precursor. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Otoni, C.G.; Figueiredo, J.S.; Capeletti, L.B.; Cardoso, M.B.; Bernardes, J.S.; Loh, W. Tailoring the antimicrobial response of cationic nanocellulose-based foams through cryo-templating. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 1975–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Li, G.; Nandgaonkar, A.G.; Habibi, Y.; Krause, W.E.; Wei, Q.; Lucia, L.A. An environmentally benign approach to achieving vectorial alignment and high microporosity in bacterial cellulose/chitosan scaffolds. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 13678–13688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. He, X.; Yao, K.; Shen, S.; Yun, J. Chemical engineering science: Freezing characteristics of acrylamide-based aqueous solution used for the preparation of supermacroporous cryogels via cryo-copolymerization. Cell. Polym. 2007, 26, 145–147. [Google Scholar]
  100. Elsherbiny, D.A.; Abdelgawad, A.M.; El-Naggar, M.E.; El-Sherbiny, R.A.; El-Rafie, M.H.; El-Sayed, I.E.-T. Synthesis, antimicrobial activity, and sustainable release of novel α-aminophosphonate derivatives loaded carrageenan cryogel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Z.; Dai, H.; Wu, W. Nanocellulose/gelatin composite cryogels for controlled drug release. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 6381–6389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lozinsky, V.; Galaev, I.Y.; Plieva, F.M.; Savina, I.N.; Jungvid, H.; Mattiasson, B. Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mikhalovsky, S.; Savina, I.; Dainiak, M.; Ivanov, A.; Galaev, I. 5.03-Biomaterials/Cryogels, 2nd ed.; Moo-Young, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 11–22. [Google Scholar]
  104. Chen, W.; Yuan, S.; Shen, J.; Chen, Y.; Xiao, Y. A composite hydrogel based on pectin/cellulose via chemical cross-linking for hemorrhage. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 627351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bozova, N.; Petrov, P.D. Highly elastic super-macroporous cryogels fabricated by thermally induced crosslinking of 2-hydroxyethylcellulose with citric acid in solid state. Molecules 2021, 26, 6370. [Google Scholar]
  106. Petrov, P.; Mokreva, P.; Kostov, I.; Uzunova, V.; Tzoneva, R. Novel electrically conducting 2-hydroxyethylcellulose/polyaniline nanocomposite cryogels: Synthesis and application in tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 140, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Serex, L.; Braschler, T.; Filippova, A.; Rochat, A.; Béduer, A.; Bertsch, A.; Renaud, P. Pore size manipulation in 3D printed cryogels enables selective cell seeding. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3, 1700340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Odabas, S. Collagen–carboxymethyl cellulose–Tricalcium phosphate multi-lamellar cryogels for tissue engineering applications: Production and characterization. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2016, 31, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Santos, G.d.S.d.; Santos, N.R.R.d.; Pereira, I.C.S.; Andrade, A.J.d.; Lima, E.M.B.; Minguita, A.P.; Rosado, L.H.G.; Moreira, A.P.D.; Middea, A.; Prudencio, E.R. Layered cryogels laden with brazilian honey intended for wound care. Polímeros 2020, 30, e2020031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cai, H.; Sharma, S.; Liu, W.; Mu, W.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Deng, Y. Aerogel microspheres from natural cellulose nanofibrils and their application as cell culture scaffold. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 2540–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, J.; Cheng, F.; Grénman, H.; Spoljaric, S.; Seppälä, J.; Eriksson, J.E.; Willför, S.; Xu, C. Development of nanocellulose scaffolds with tunable structures to support 3D cell culture. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 148, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ferreira, F.V.; Souza, L.; Martins, T.M.M.; Lopes, J.H.; Mattos, B.D.; Mariano, M.; Pinheiro, I.F.; Valverde, T.M.; Livi, S.; Camilli, J.A.; et al. Nanocellulose/bioactive glass cryogels as scaffolds for bone regeneration. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 19842–19849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Ghafari, R.; Jonoobi, M.; Amirabad, L.M.; Oksman, K.; Taheri, A.R. Fabrication and characterization of novel bilayer scaffold from nanocellulose based aerogel for skin tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhang, F.; Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Meng, X.; Tong, G.; Deng, Y. Temperature-sensitive poly-nipam modified cellulose nanofibril cryogel microspheres for controlled drug release. Cellulose 2016, 23, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Guiza, K.; Ben Arfi, R.; Mougin, K.; Vaulot, C.; Michelin, L.; Josien, L.; Schrodj, G.; Ghorbal, A. Development of novel and ecological keratin/cellulose-based composites for absorption of oils and organic solvents. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 46655–46668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kunz Lazzari, L.d.; Perondi, D.; Zattera, A.J.; Campomanes Santana, R.M. Cellulose/biochar cryogels: A study of adsorption kinetics and isotherms. Langmuir 2021, 37, 3180–3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Toledo, P.V.; Martins, B.F.; Pirich, C.L.; Sierakowski, M.R.; Neto, E.T.; Petri, D.F. Cellulose based cryogels as adsorbents for organic pollutants. Macromol. Symp. 2019, 383, 1800013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Tian, Y.; Zhang, X.; Feng, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhong, T. Shapeable and underwater super-elastic cellulose nanofiber/alginate cryogels by freezing-induced oxa-michael reaction for efficient protein purification. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 272, 118498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Lazzari, L.K.; Zampieri, V.B.; Zanini, M.; Zattera, A.J.; Baldasso, C. Sorption capacity of hydrophobic cellulose cryogels silanized by two different methods. Cellulose 2017, 24, 3421–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 02037 g001 550
Figure 1. Ways to produce cellulose cryogel for biomedical applications: (a) via dissolution and regeneration; (b) using nanowhiskers.
Figure 1. Ways to produce cellulose cryogel for biomedical applications: (a) via dissolution and regeneration; (b) using nanowhiskers.
Ijms 23 02037 g001
Ijms 23 02037 g002 550
Figure 2. Complex molecular structure of cellulose: (a) native cellulose I unit cells, triclinic Iα and monoclinic Iβ [37] © 2022 National Academy of Sciences; (b) H-bond network of cellulose I; (c) polymorph transitions.
Figure 2. Complex molecular structure of cellulose: (a) native cellulose I unit cells, triclinic Iα and monoclinic Iβ [37] © 2022 National Academy of Sciences; (b) H-bond network of cellulose I; (c) polymorph transitions.
Ijms 23 02037 g002
Ijms 23 02037 g003 550
Figure 3. Influence of different factors on cellulose cryogel properties.
Figure 3. Influence of different factors on cellulose cryogel properties.
Ijms 23 02037 g003
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of typical cellulose solvents.
Table 1. Characteristics of typical cellulose solvents.
SolventAdvantagesDisadvantagesReference
LiCl/DMAcIt does not cause any destruction of the cellulose, provided that destructive pretreatments are avoided (such as heating over 80 °C).The difficulty of removing LiCl from the final products.[45]
Ionic liquidsThey completely dissolve the material’s components.Ionic liquids do not evaporate, have low volatility, which complicates their regeneration.[50,51,52,53]
7–9%NaOH/water
(7%NaOH/12%urea/water)		Cellulose gels can be obtained.The thermodynamic quality of the solvent decreases with increasing temperature, as the number of cellulose–cellulose interactions increases more rapidly than the number of cellulose–solvent interactions; Na+ ions penetrate deeply into the cellulose structure, making it difficult to remove alkali.[26,42,43]
Complexing compounds of Cu with ethylenediamine (or Cd-ethylenediamine complexes)Commonly used to determine the molecular weight of cellulose.The difficulty of removing from the final products.[44]
N-methyl-morpholine-N-oxide monohydrateDirect solvent of cellulose:
N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) is a cellulose solvent used industrially for the spinning of cellulosic fibers (the Lyocell process). NMMO is known to change the highly crystalline structure of cellulose after dissolution and regeneration.		In theory, this dissolution process is merely physical, but in practice many side reactions might occur.[46,47,48,49]
Concentrated phosphoric acidRapid dissolution, easily removed and regenerated.Causes significant destruction of macromolecules.[54]
Table
Table 2. Cellulose cryogels for biomedical applications.
Table 2. Cellulose cryogels for biomedical applications.
PolymerProductionCharacteristicsApplicationReference
MCCCalcium thiocyanate tetrahydrate and water (117 °C)Porosity 94.3%
Density 84.1 kg/m3
Surface area 23 m2/g
E 13.27 ± 1.5 МРа		New filter types, various biomedical applications.[31]
MCC8 wt% NaOH-water (cross-linking with epichlorohydrin)Pore size up to 200 µm
Density 0.04–0.121 g/cm3		Drug release, materials with controlled morphology and porosity.[33]
MCC/pectin1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium chlorideDense network structureHemostatic material (had no effect on cell proliferation but offered favorable properties in liver hemostasis).[104]
HECCryogenic treatment with citric acid, freeze-dryingInterconnected pores 100–180 µmMatrices for immobilized enzymes and cells, readily degraded in acidic conditions[105]
HEC/polyanilineStirred at 40 °C in water for 20 min, sonicated tissue engineering scaffolds, high survival and proliferation in electric field, good adhesion, spreading, and rearrangement onto materials.[106]
CMCDissolved in deionized water and crosslinking with adipic acid dihydrazide and a small excess of the carbodiimide at −20 °C.E 4.2 ± 1.4 MPaNeural tissue engineering, cell delivery (restoration of brain tissue through delivery to the neural network).[16]
CMC/ColMixing two streams: CMC solution (2%) in deionized water with adipic acid dihydrazide, buffer solution and solution N-(3-dimethylaminopopyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide chloridate (EDC, in deionized water). The resulting cryogels were soaked in the collagen solution, and then soaked in the EDC solution to fix the collagen.Porosity > 90%
Uniform density		Tissue engineering, spreading and proliferation of NOR-10 fibroblasts.[107]
CMC/Col
CMC/Col/TCP		Mixing two solutions (1:2)-CMC solution (distilled water), Col solution (acetic acid).
TCP was added to the final solution.		Average lamellar spaces 204 ± 95 µm (Col/CMC) and 195 ± 21 µm (Col/CMC/TCP)
E 309 ± 18 kPa (Col/CMC) and 481 ± 27 kPa (Col/CMC/TCP)		Regeneration of hard tissues, non-toxic and compatible with blood.[108]
CMC/PVA/honeySolvent water, each layer was applied alternately with preliminary freezing of the previous. Wound healing, showed activity against S. aureus compared to their counterparts without honey.[109]
CNF
(bleached softwood kraft pulp)		Mechanical defibrillation in deionized water, sonication to obtain the nanofibril aqueous gel, which then sprayed and atomized at 40 MPa, frozen in liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried.Density 0.0018 g/cm3
Surface area 389 m2/g		Tissue engineering, evaluated using 3T3 NIH cells.[110]
CNF
(bleached birch Kraft
Pulp)		Solvent-TEMPO, sodium bromide, NaOH.
TEMPO-oxidized cellulose fibers (NaClO) were precipitated in ethanol.
CNF hydrogels were obtained from the CNF films followed by solvent exchange from ethanol to tertbutanol, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and freeze-dried.		Porosity 88.0–99.7%
Pore size 10–200 µm
Density 0.004–0.180 g/cm3
Surface area 158–308 m2/g
E 28–104.4 kPa		Tissue engineering, evaluated using HeLa and Jurkat cells.[111]
CNF
(cellulose powder)		CNF powder in deionized water dispersed by sonication, crosslinked with glyoxal solutions, frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried.For CNF cryogel 35 ± 9 µm, for crosslinked cryogel 60 ± 20 µm
0.003–0.11 g/cm3 for CNF cryogel,
0.003–0.09 g/cm3 for crosslinked cryogel
Up to 1 m2/g
0.1 MPa for CNF cryogel,
50.8 ± 8 MPa for crosslinked cryogel		Bone tissue engineering, assayed in vitro with MG-63 cells.[15]
CNF/Col
(wood powder of 60–80 meshes)		NCFs were sonicated, oxidized by NaIO4. The dialdehyde NCFs were mixed with collagen 1:1, frozen and freeze-dried.Porosity 90–95%
Density 0.02–0.03 g/cm3		Tissue engineering, supported fibroblast proliferation.[18]
CNF/gelatin/chitosan
(high-purity softwood cellulose)		Crosslinking in situ with genipin, frozen and freeze-dried.Porosity 95%
Pore size 75–200 µm
Density 0.06–0.09 g/cm3
E 1–3 MPa		Cartilage tissue engineering (ASC and L929 cells)[17]
CNF/ bioactive glassCellulose nanofibrils (CNF) are introduced.High porosity
Pore size 96–168 µm
E 24 ± 1 kPa		Bone tissue engineering (MC3T3-E1 cells and calvarial bone defect in rats in vivo)[112]
CNF/PVA
(commercial CNF)		Crosslinking with polyamide-epichlorohydrin, frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried.Porosity 88.5–95.3%Pore size 90 and 20 µm
Density 0.006–0.05 g/cm3
Compressive strength
5–220 kPa
E 0.04–8.3 kPa		Skin tissue engineering, supported fibroblast cells. [113]
CNF)/
NIPAm
(commercial bleached softwood kraft pulp)		Crosslinked and sonicated, frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried.Density 0.01–0.14 g/m3Drug release.[114]
Cellulose (wood dust from the plywood sanding)Nanocellulose suspension from alkaline treated wood waste powders was redispersed in deionized water, frozen and freeze-dried.Porosity 97.8–99.8%
Pore diameter 3.7–8.3 nm
Density 0.004–0.036 g/m3
Surface area 419–457 m2/g,
E 7–165 kPa,
Thermal performance 34–44 mW/m⋅K		Biomedicine, pollution filtering, thermal insulation.[77]
MCC—microcrystalline cellulose, ECH—epichlorohydrin, HEC—hydroxyethylcellulose, CMC—carboxymethyl cellulose, ECM—extracellular matrix, EDC—N-(3-dimethylaminopopyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide chloridate, Col—collagen, TCP—tricalcium phosphate, TEMPO—2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl oxyl, PVA—polyvinyl alcohol, CNF—cellulose nanofibril, NIPAm—N-isopropylacrylamide.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tyshkunova, I.V.; Poshina, D.N.; Skorik, Y.A. Cellulose Cryogels as Promising Materials for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042037

AMA Style

Tyshkunova IV, Poshina DN, Skorik YA. Cellulose Cryogels as Promising Materials for Biomedical Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(4):2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tyshkunova, Irina V., Daria N. Poshina, and Yury A. Skorik. 2022. "Cellulose Cryogels as Promising Materials for Biomedical Applications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 4: 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop