Next Article in Journal
Drug Repurposing of the Unithiol: Inhibition of Metallo-β-Lactamases for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
Next Article in Special Issue
Future Prospects of Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Is There Hope in Other Immune Checkpoints Targeting Molecules?
Previous Article in Journal
CRISPR Therapeutics for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Previous Article in Special Issue
TRIM37 Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Progression through Modulation of Cell Growth, Migration, Invasion, and Tumor Immune Microenvironment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms23031833
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Granzymes: The Molecular Executors of Immune-Mediated Cytotoxicity

by
Zachary L. Z. Hay
and
Jill E. Slansky
*
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031833
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 25 January 2022 / Accepted: 27 January 2022 / Published: 6 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Immunology of Solid Tumors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes, differentiated CD8+ T cells, use multiple mechanisms to mediate their function, including release of granules containing perforin and granzymes at target cells. Granzymes are a family of cytotoxic proteases that each act on unique sets of biological substrates within target cells, usually to induce cell death. Granzymes are differentially expressed within T cells, depending on their environment and activation state, making the granzyme cytotoxic pathway dynamic and responsive to individual circumstances. In this review, we describe what is currently known about granzyme structure, processing, and granzyme-induced cell death in the context of cancer and in some other inflammatory diseases.

1. Introduction

Granzymes (Gzms), a family of cytotoxic proteases, are key players in cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) elimination of target cells. Gzms are also expressed by other immune cells, such as natural killer cells [1,2] and mast cells [3], but we mainly focus on CD8 T cell expression of Gzms here. Activated CD8 T cells recognize and eliminate their targets as their T cell receptor (TCR) interacts with target cell MHC class I molecules loaded with peptide (pMHC). The T cells’ environment allows dynamic T cell responses to pMHC. This dynamic response includes elimination of target cells through expression of specific Gzms. A more complete understanding of the Gzm system may reveal potential molecular targets to improve CTL activity against cancer and other cells.
Recent breakthroughs utilizing the human immune system to target and eliminate malignancies has revolutionized how cancer is treated. Checkpoint blockade therapy, adoptive T cell therapy, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy have shown clinical benefits and rely on generating or augmenting a T cell response against cancer cells for their efficacy. T cells mediate their cytotoxic function through multiple mechanisms, which is of particular interest given the advancements in immunotherapies [4,5]. While T cells have a multitude of functions in regulating their microenvironments, such as modulating angiogenesis [6], affecting the inflammatory state [7], and recruiting other immune cells [8], a critical function remains—killing of target cells in an antigen-specific manner. Elimination of specific target cells is a key facet of the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapies. Targeting the cytotoxic activities of T cells may prove critical to improving the efficacy of treatments without increasing unwanted side effects or increasing the number of T cells needed for treatment.
There are three main pathways that CTLs use to kill target cells: the death ligand pathway, production of cytokine interferon gamma (IFNγ), and the cytotoxic granule pathway. In the death ligand pathway, a secreted or cell surface ligand, such as Fas ligand (FasL) or TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), interacts with its receptor on the target cell, which induces cell death. The Fas/FasL interaction leads to activation of the caspase cascade and apoptosis in target cells ensues [9,10,11]. This pathway relies on target cell expression of receptors for death ligands, which are modulated by target tumor cells, preventing activation of cell death, and providing a mechanism of escape from immune-mediated cytotoxicity [12].
IFNγ reduces tumor cell proliferation through activation of the transcription factor STAT1, which regulates the kinase inhibitor p21 and inhibits cell cycle progression [13]. IFNγ also increases tumor cell death by increasing the expression of Fas and TRAIL [14,15] and potentiates increased apoptosis by upregulating the expression of multiple caspases [16,17]. Finally, IFNγ directly acts on endothelial cells to stop blood flow in vascularized tumors leading to tumor collapse [18]. While much of IFNγ’s activity is indirectly cytotoxic, relying on other mechanisms for ultimate destruction of tumor cells, it has a critical role in T cell-mediated tumor cell lysis.
CTLs primarily eliminate target tumor cells using cytotoxic granules [19]. CTLs store cytotoxic molecules in specialized lysosomes/secretory vesicles termed granules that, upon ligation of their T cell receptor (TCR), are released towards the immunological synapse at the target cell [20,21]. In addition to Gzms, cytotoxic granules contain a host of other proteases, including cathepsins, which can activate other lysosomal proteases [22] and granulysin, which can destroy intracellular microbial membranes [23,24,25]. Cytotoxic granules also contain perforin, a pore-forming protein that damages the cellular membrane of target cells and mediates entry of Gzms into the target cell cytosol [26,27,28]. The Gzm proteases each act upon specific and unique substrates within the target cell to initiate cell death [29,30,31].
Gzms are critical to multiple disease states, contributing to the progression of atopic dermatitis [32,33], cardiovascular disease [34], diabetes [35], and other inflammatory diseases, including sepsis [36]. Gzm B inhibition also reduces disease severity in autoimmune skin blistering diseases [37]. Increased expression of Gzms is therefore not inherently protective; in fact, it participates in a range of pathologies. The disease processes that Gzms contribute to highlight their destructive potential, necessary for immune-mediated defense against intracellular pathogens and malignancies, but they are also a danger when dysregulated. The cytotoxic activity requires regulation of Gzm production critical to the effective, but safe, functioning of cytotoxic immune cells. The contribution of Gzms to these different disease states may make them ideal targets to treat a range of immune-mediated diseases and their participation in protective immune responses could be key to enhancing targeted cytotoxicity against cancer cells.

2. Granzymes

The Gzm enzymes can be divided into three subclasses separated by chromosomal location (Table 1). The Gzm A locus of Gzms contains Gzm A and K and is located on chromosome 13 in mice and chromosome 5 in humans [38,39]. The Gzm B locus that contains Gzm B, and a varying number of related Gzms, depending on the organism, is contained on chromosome 14 in both mouse and human genomes [39,40]. The Gzm M locus, which contains only Gzm M, is located on chromosome 10 in mice and 19 in humans [39].
The Gzm B locus contains Gzm B and Gzm H in humans, and in mice contains Gzm C–G and N. The mouse Gzm B locus is organized as (5′ → 3′) Gzm B, C, F, N, G, D, E. All Gzms from this locus other than Gzm B are orphan Gzms, designating that they do not yet have defined substrates. Little is currently known about these orphan Gzms in either humans or mice; however, experiments using recombinant Gzm proteins have demonstrated the capacity of these molecules to induce unique forms of cell death in target cancer cells and unique expression profiles of cytotoxic mediators, even those contained within the same locus. Experimental immunotherapies in the early phases of development are testing different death pathways to improve the immune response against cancer [41,42,43,44,45].

3. Gzm Sequence and Phylogeny Analysis

Phylogenetic trees constructed from the protein sequences encoding each Gzm in humans and mice, which show similarity between Gzms A, K, and M, suggesting that they likely evolved together and that these Gzms predate the divergence of rodents and primates (Figure 1A). Gzm H in humans and Gzm C in mice most closely resemble human and mouse Gzm B, respectively. Additionally, both Gzms are adjacent to their respective Gzm B suggesting similarity of function between Gzms H and C. However, phylogenetic analysis does not predict the substrate specificity of each individual Gzm, even among largely homologous enzymes. The potential divergence of target substrates between species adds additional complexity to comparing enzyme activities between species. The remaining Gzms in the mouse Gzm B locus all cluster with one another, and many have the most sequence homology of all mouse Gzms (Figure 1B) but remain the least studied Gzms. The greatest sequence homology within Gzms is found on the same locus. Gzm M is the sole member of its locus and has the least sequence homology with all other Gzms, sharing no more than 36.9% of its sequence with any other Gzm. Gzms D and E share the greatest homology with 91.1% shared sequence.
The presence of additional Gzm genes in the mouse genome suggests that mice had more pressure to maintain a greater range or redundancy in immune-mediated cytotoxicity to combat evasive intracellular infections, and that some mouse Gzms may function in response to specific pathogens or cell death evasion tactics. The lack of homologous Gzms for all mouse Gzms does not preclude the possibility that these orphan mouse Gzms could retain functionality in human cells and may retain their specific cytotoxic function across species, which has been confirmed in multiple Gzms already [46]. Alternatively, other yet-unidentified molecules in human cells may replace the function of these mouse Gzms.
While each Gzm has been shown to act on unique sets of substrates, thus far (Table 2), and even have divergent cytotoxic functions, they remain largely homologous in many ways. All Gzms share critically conserved amino acid sequence elements that confer similarities in their enzymatic activities (Figure 2A,B). By aligning Gzm sequences, we determined the percent sequence homology shared between all Gzms (Figure 1B).
All Gzms are produced as zymogens, or proenzymes, that require both the cleavage of a leader sequence and a dipeptide to become fully activated [69,70,71]. The leader sequence is predominantly hydrophobic residues in all Gzms, although the sequence and sequence length diverge somewhat, especially in the Gzm B locus (Figure 2). The dipeptide is largely conserved amongst Gzms, especially within the Gzm B locus, where they all share the same dipeptide amino acid sequence “EE,” except for Gzm B itself. Each active Gzm starts with the highly conserved “IIGG” amino acids, which is present in all Gzms except Gzm N. Each Gzm contains three sets of cystine residues that form disulfide bonds which dictate the Gzm structure. Marked with small circles in Figure 2A,B, there are the highly conserved residues that form the catalytic triad (S-H-D) in the active site of these Gzms. The S-H-D motif is one of the most common catalytic triads and relies on the histidine to polarize the serine hydroxyl group. This motif creates an effective nucleophile which initiates the enzymatic activity on substrates and is further characterized by the formation of an oxyanion hole which stabilizes charge buildup on substrate intermediates [72,73].

4. Gzm Production and Regulation

Given the cytotoxic potential and potent effects on immunity that many Gzms have, CTLs have evolved multiple methods to protect themselves from their own cytotoxic proteases. CTLs are safeguarded by producing Gzms in an inactive state. As discussed above, a highly conserved feature of all Gzms, across species, is their production as an inactive zymogen [69,70,71]. Gzms are translated with both a leader sequence and a dipeptide that must be cleaved from the N-terminus before the Gzms are enzymatically active [69,70,71] (Figure 3). The leader sequence is predicted to mediate entry into the cytotoxic granule and is cleaved in the process, though the Gzm remains inactive due to the dipeptide sequence. Cathepsin C and other proteases stored in the granules cleave the dipeptide [74]. The active Gzms are stored safely inside the granules, segregated from the cytosol, to avoid damage to the CTL in which they were produced.
In addition to segregation and storage of Gzms within CTL, transcription of Gzm mRNA is also regulated in different environments and activation states of the CTL. In fact, Gzms are some of the most differentially regulated genes in T cells, with some of the orphan Gzms having the most distinct differences in expression based upon the environment in which the T cell is found [75]. Further elucidation of the function of each of these Gzms is needed to conclude if the orphan Gzms are playing a critical role through their unique substrate specificity and function in mediating an effective immune response.
While there are multiple steps between mRNA production and production of the active Gzm, these steps do not appear to be mechanisms regulating the expression of these proteins, just their activity within the cells in which they are produced. RNA expression strongly correlates with protein expression for Gzms in T cells and suggests that Gzm production is largely regulated at the RNA transcript level, rather than post-transcriptionally [76,77].
Gzms can be expressed by multiple different immune cell subtypes and the expression pattern of each Gzm within different cell subtypes differs. Using the Immunological Proteomic Resource (ImmPRes), we determined the amount Gzm proteins produced in different immune cell subtypes in mice hematopoietic cells (Figure 4). The hematopoietic cells probed in the ImmPRes dataset include T cells, natural killer cells, eosinophils, mast cells, and macrophages, and is a powerful resource to determine protein production of difficult to measure molecules, including the majority of the Gzms, which do not yet have a commercial antibody available for detection. ImmPRes probed T cells from different lineages and in multiple conditions. From this dataset we show that each Gzm is differentially regulated in T cells after alternative forms of activation. However, this dataset does not represent every environmental pressure that affects T cells and their production of Gzms. Within the tumor microenvironment (TME), multiple Gzms are increased in CD8+ T cells [78,79], indicating that Gzm expression is responsive to T cell environmental pressures, not all of which can be measured in vitro.
Gzm B is expressed in the widest range of immune cells, including every T cell subset examined apart from naive CD4+ T cells and macrophages. Gzm B also appears to be the most abundant Gzm in most of the cell populations in which Gzms are expressed, followed by GzmA. The increased abundance of Gzm A and B over other Gzms in ImmPRes is consistent with current literature, which has long suggested that these Gzms are the most abundant [80,81].
Differences in Gzm expression between CTLs from different environments and activation states has driven research preferentially into studying Gzms highly expressed in the models most commonly available, and has likely precluded investigation into Gzms expressed in more specific T cell subsets. These more restrictively expressed Gzms may represent more effective cytotoxic molecules that are only upregulated upon specific environmental cues or stimulation events and may warrant their further investigation.
The requirement for expression of not only a specific Gzm in the immune cell but for its unique substrate to be present in the target cell adds further difficulty to understanding the complex interactions needed for Gzm-induced cell death.

5. Cytotoxicity and Other Impacts of Gzms

Not all Gzms have specific cytotoxic functions, and some are non-cytotoxic intra and extracellularly [82,83,84]. However, the main function of most Gzms is still presumed to be direct elimination of target cells, though the specific mechanism and type of cell death induced varies. Using Gzms as a tool to improve the effector function of T cells may increase the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies, but to test this possibility, further understanding of each Gzm’s molecular function is still required.
Below we will describe what is currently known about the function of individual Gzms, which is summarized in Table 2 and in Figure 5.

5.1. Gzm B

Gzm B is the best studied and characterized Gzm, and as such there are many reagents available for further study. Gzm B knock out mice [85], colorimetric assays to measure Gzm B enzymatic activity [86], recombinant Gzm B proteins [87,88], multiple antibody clones against human and mice Gzm B to allow for detection by flow cytometry, Western blot, immune histochemistry and ELISA [22,89] have all facilitated experiments to understand Gzm B better than the other Gzms.
Gzm B activates the caspase cascade through cleavage of one of the primary executioners of apoptosis, caspase-3, and in humans specifically, through the cleavage of the protein Bid, which is also a part of the canonical apoptotic pathway [90,91,92,93,94] (Figure 5). This process culminates in cell blebbing, where cellular contents are packaged and released, followed by efficient phagocytosis of the dying cell before complete loss of cell membrane integrity [95]. Apoptosis is a largely “immunologically silent” or even suppressive form of cell death [96,97,98]. Gzm B is one of the most widely expressed Gzms in T cells regardless of activation status, whereas other Gzms are expressed in higher quantities under specific conditions [99]. This widespread expression of Gzm B highlights the importance that it induces a less immunogenic form of cell death and is likely an adaptive feature of Gzm B’s induction of canonical apoptotic cell death, rather than inducing a form of cell death that could increase inflammation.
Additionally, human Gzm B can cleave and activate Bid, into truncated Bid, which can then activate the proteins Bax and/or Bak. Bax and Bak oligomerize in the mitochondrial outer membrane, permeabilizing the membrane and allowing for the release of cytochrome C, which is usually stored in the mitochondrial inter-membrane space, into the cytosol [46]. Release of cytochrome C initiates the assembly of the apoptosome, composed of Apaf-1 and caspase-9, which is critical in activating other caspases and continuing the caspase cascade to induce apoptosis [100,101,102,103].
Mouse GzmB and Human GzmB both show enzymatic activity against caspase-3 and caspase-7, and both enzymes induce cell death in tumor cells from both species. However, their substrate preferences and activities diverge [46]. Human Gzm B alone cleaves BID from either species but can cleave only human ICAD and caspase-8. Mouse Gzm B does not cleave BID, ICAD, or caspase-8 from either species [46]. This highlights the specificity of Gzms for their substrates and how alterations between species in either the Gzm or the substrate can result in differences in activity. Ultimately, both human and mouse Gzm B have some shared substrates and are functional in both species to initiate the caspase cascade and trigger specifically apoptotic cell death (Table 2).

5.2. Gzm A

Early data showed that Gzm A and Gzm B are the most abundant Gzms and were the only Gzms detected, though at lower frequencies, in inactivated T cell subsets [80,81]. However, while other Gzms are not as widely expressed, their production can be drastically increased in smaller CTL subsets within specific environments and potentially different types of activation [75,78,79], and may represent important subpopulations of highly functional, or dysfunctional, T cells.
Gzm A function is not completely defined, and contradictory results are reported on the mechanism of cell death Gzm A induces [47,50,51,104]. However, multiple experiments show that Gzm A acts as an initiator of pro-inflammatory signaling within target cells [104,105]. More specifically, it is established that Gzm A directly cleaves a key mediator of the inflammatory response, the pro-cytokine IL-1B [50], which is necessary in the activation and secretion of this cytokine.
Additionally, Gzm A directly cleaves human gasdermin B, a member of the gasdermin family of proteins that forms pores in the plasma membrane [47]. Specifically, when Gzm A cleaves the gasdermin inhibitory domains the remaining pore forming domains oligomerize and bind to phospholipids of the plasma membrane, leaving a hole. Cell death ensues by pyroptosis [106,107,108], a pro-inflammatory form of cell death. Canonical pyroptosis was previously considered reliant on the formation of an inflammasome by activated caspase-1 and cleavage of gasdermin D [109,110]. However, gasdermin B is one of multiple gasdermins that are now known to be executioners of pyroptotic cell death [111,112]. Gzm A-induced cell death is caspase-independent [47,51,104], but through direct activation of gasdermin B, initiates the terminal step of the pyroptotic pathway.
Another substrate of Gzm A is the protein NDUFS3, which is a mitochondrial matrix protein and critical component of the electron transport chain [51]. Gzm A disruption of this process causes an increase in reactive oxygen species. This process is independent of mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), does not result in the cleavage of Bid or release of apoptogenic factors [113], nor does it require bak or bax activity [114]. This unique combination of events suggests another mechanism through which Gzm A induces cell death: through an MOMP- and caspase-independent pathway, that generates reactive oxygen species and disrupts ATP generation.
While there are multiple different pathways Gzm A could be interacting with in target cells, the consensus amongst these studies is that Gzm A functions to induce an inflammatory form cytotoxicity.

5.3. Gzm M

Gzm M is the only member of the Gzm M locus [39] and can induce cytotoxicity in target human cells though not target mouse cells [67]. However, the exact nature of this cell death, if it is observed, varies between studies [64,67]. Gzm M has been shown to induce both a caspase-dependent and a caspase-independent form of apoptotic cell death in humans [64,115]. Gzm M is largely expressed by natural killer cells, though CTLs also express this enzyme. One mechanism through which human Gzm M executes its cytotoxic function is through cleavage of the protein Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD) [64]. Cleaved FADD self-oligomerizes and associates with caspase-8, which is then processed into its active state to initiate the caspase cascade [116]. While both mouse and human Gzm M induce apoptosis in human cancer cells in vitro, Gzm M from either species does not induce apoptosis in mouse cancer cells [67]. Other studies report that natural killer cells from Gzm M-deficient mice have impaired control of tumor growth in vivo [117], suggesting a critical function of mouse Gzm M outside of direct induction of apoptosis. Gzm M-induced cell death induces morphological changes in target cells, including chromatin condensation and the presence of large cytoplasmic vacuoles. Both mouse and human Gzm M cleave α-tubulin of either species and disrupt the microtubule network [67], contributing to observed morphological changes [118]. These studies present mechanisms through which both mouse and human Gzm M affect target cancer cells; although, they also highlight how changes in Gzm substrates between species can impact the function of individual Gzms.

5.4. Gzm K

Gzm K is clustered and most homologous with Gzm A. Gzm K and A share some substrate specificities, though Gzm K does have other unique functions. In humans, Gzm K has been found to have multiple biological substrates, including SET [59], Bid [119], and Ape1 [62]. Critically, Gzm A does not have enzymatic activity against Bid, highlighting a potential functional difference between these Gzms. In mice, the function of Gzm K is less well studied, but similar to Gzm A, there is some evidence that mouse Gzm K initiates inflammation in target cells [120].

5.5. Gzm F

An initial study of Gzm F, an orphan mouse Gzm, suggests that it induces a caspase-independent, necroptotic-like form of cell death [55]. Necroptotic cell death is a regulated form of cell death that has strong immunogenic effects [121] in part through the release of cellular contents and damage-associated molecular patterns [122].
The induction of this immunogenic form of cell death in an antigen-specific manner could present a leverageable tool to influence the TME but requires a better understanding of the mechanism of Gzm F-induced cell death. Gzm F-induced cell death results in cellular membrane disruption and phosphatidylserine externalization at concentrations and time points where Gzm B induces phosphatidylserine externalization but no membrane disruption. These differences suggest a unique form of cell death induction. Additionally, Gzm F induces mitochondrial damage, and single-stranded DNA nicking, rather than DNA fragmentation, cellular organelle damage, and extensive vacuolization of the cytoplasm, indicative of necroptosis-like cell death [56]. Disruption of the mitochondria results in impairment of electron transport and ATP generation. ATP decline switches the form of cell death from apoptosis to more necrotic-like forms of cell death [57], demonstrating how Gzm F suppresses apoptosis by preventing the formation of the apoptosome. Gzm F impairment has a significant impact on CTL-induced cytotoxicity in caspase-inhibited tumor cells. Taken together, these findings suggest an immunogenic form of cell death unique amongst the Gzm family.
Analysis of publicly available datasets has shown that Gzm F is one of the most highly upregulated genes in CD8 T cells in the TME [78,79]. This increase in Gzm F could be a marker of a specific T cell activation status intended to increase cytotoxic activity in exhausted CD8 T cells or could be a mechanism for terminally exhausted T cells to eliminate themselves. Further work is still required to understand the function of one of the most highly upregulated genes in T cells within the TME and to determine the capacity of Gzm F-mediated necroptotic-like cell death to modulate the TME’s immunogenicity.

5.6. Gzm C

Little is currently known about Gzm C, an orphan mouse Gzm. However, preliminary studies of this protease have indicated that it induces cell death in target cells. Gzm C is directly downstream of Gzm B and has the greatest sequence homology to mouse Gzm B of all mouse Gzms, though the form of cytotoxicity is unique from Gzm B-induced cell death.
Gzm C-induced cell death is caspase-independent, and does not rely on activation of BID, or CAD nuclease, and results in rapid phosphatidylserine externalization and single-stranded DNA nicking, rather than double-stranded DNA cleavage [54]. Additionally, the molar quantity required for activity and the kinetics of Gzm C-induced cytotoxicity are similar to those for Gzm B-induced cell death, suggesting that Gzm C expression can influence the type of cell death induced and that it plays a non-redundant role in T cell-mediated cytotoxicity [54].

5.7. Gzm H

Gzm H is the only other granzyme located on the Gzm B locus in humans. Gzm H is still poorly understood, though there has been some preliminary work to define Gzm H’s function. In one study, Gzm H acted independently of caspases, did not activate Bid, and did not induce the release of cytochrome C [123], suggesting that Gzm H induces a non-apoptotic form of cell death. However, another study found Gzm H induces a caspase-dependent form of cell death that directly activates Bid and induces DNA fragmentation, similar to Gzm B activity [124]. Both studies used recombinant Gzm H but came to conflicting conclusions regarding the mechanism of Gzm H-induced cell death. Critically, both agreed that Gzm H has cytotoxic activities.

6. Conclusions

Gzms are often released in the terminal step of T cell interactions with target cells and present a means for antigen-specific T cells to directly influence the TME. The specific pathway each Gzm impacts target cells is being elucidated; although, many Gzms remain poorly understood. Taken together, the lack of fully defined pathways and potential for direct, antigen-specific, immune-mediated manipulation of the TME make the Gzm molecules prime targets for further investigation and potential immunotherapies.
The granule exocytosis pathway participates in a wide range of cellular mechanisms to induce cytotoxicity in target cells. While we have described what is known about the function of Gzms in CTLs individually, Gzms are not expressed individually. One CTL expresses multiple different Gzm genes at different levels under different conditions [99]. Thus, any crosstalk between Gzms and the microenvironment or each other may have consequences. The studies to date of individual Gzms may not reveal the full picture. Each Gzm works in concert with other Gzms, activating different pathways simultaneously, and any synergistic effects will depend on the array of Gzms being produced by a given CTL. While research to examine individual Gzms is critical to furthering our understanding, experiments examining how these Gzms work in collaboration, or in genetically engineered immune cells directly, are notably lacking from the field at present.
Studies using mass cytometry have confirmed that separate T cell differentiation stages utilize different and specialized cytotoxic programs, as characterized by their expression of different Gzms and cytotoxic mediators measured [99]. The cytotoxic profile may contribute to predicting patient outcomes, design more effective immunotherapies, and suggest the importance of understanding when and where each CTL expresses individual Gzms.
Gzms are some of the most differentially expressed genes in T cells taken from different environments [75,78,79]. Gzm B is often used to gauge T cell activation and cytotoxic capacity. However, other Gzms have more significant changes in their expression levels than Gzm B, suggesting that Gzm B expression alone is not sufficient to predict T cell function. The alternative functions of the whole Gzm family indicates that CTL could be using the mechanism of cell death to further orchestrate and control the immune response subsequent to target cell destruction. Alternative forms of cell death may impact the TME, stimulating or suppressing immunogenicity. This dynamic may be a component of T cell-mediated cancer treatment that is not yet effectively leveraged. Gzms are the key mechanism utilized by CTLs to directly eliminate cancer cells, so furthering our understanding of the functions of each Gzm represents an unmet opportunity to improve T cell-mediated immunotherapies.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Z.L.Z.H.; writing—reviewing and editing, Z.L.Z.H. and J.E.S.; funding acquisition, J.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institutes of Health, grant number R01 CA226879-04 and by the National Institutes of Health NIAID training grant (Training Program in Immunology; T32-AI07405) award to Z.L.Z.H.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge that Figure 3 and Figure 4 were created with BioRender.com (accessed on 24 November 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pardo, J.; Balkow, S.; Anel, A.; Simon, M.M. Granzymes are essential for natural killer cell-mediated and perf-facilitated tumor control. Eur. J. Immunol. 2002, 32, 2881–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Goujon, M.; McWilliam, H.; Li, W.; Valentin, F.; Squizzato, S.; Paern, J.; Lopez, R. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W695–W699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pardo, J.; Wallich, R.; Ebnet, K.; Iden, S.; Zentgraf, H.; Martin, P.; Ekiciler, A.; Prins, A.; Müllbacher, A.; Huber, M.; et al. Granzyme B is expressed in mouse mast cells in vivo and in vitro and causes delayed cell death independent of perforin. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14, 1768–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Buchan, S.L.; Fallatah, M.; Thirdborough, S.M.; Taraban, V.Y.; Rogel, A.; Thomas, L.J.; Penfold, C.A.; He, L.Z.; Curran, M.A.; Keler, T.; et al. PD-1 Blockade and CD27 Stimulation Activate Distinct Transcriptional Programs That Synergize for CD8(+) T-Cell-Driven Antitumor Immunity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 2383–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tumeh, P.C.; Harview, C.L.; Yearley, J.H.; Shintaku, I.P.; Taylor, E.J.M.; Robert, L.; Chmielowski, B.; Spasic, M.; Henry, G.; Ciobanu, V.; et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 2014, 515, 568–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hur, J.; Yang, H.M.; Yoon, C.H.; Lee, C.S.; Park, K.W.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, T.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Kang, H.J.; Chae, I.H.; et al. Identification of a novel role of T cells in postnatal vasculogenesis: Characterization of endothelial progenitor cell colonies. Circulation 2007, 116, 1671–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Raphael, I.; Nalawade, S.; Eagar, T.N.; Forsthuber, T.G. T cell subsets and their signature cytokines in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Cytokine 2015, 74, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zlotnik, A.; Yoshie, O. Chemokines: A New Classification System and Their Role in Immunity. Immunity 2000, 12, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Waring, P.; Müllbacher, A. Cell death induced by the Fas/Fas ligand pathway and its role in pathology. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1999, 77, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ashkenazi, A.; Dixit, V.M. Death receptors: Signaling and modulation. Science 1998, 281, 1305–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ashkenazi, A.; Dixit, V.M. Apoptosis control by death and decoy receptors. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1999, 11, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bullani, R.R.; Wehrli, P.; Viard-Leveugle, I.; Rimoldi, D.; Cerottini, J.C.; Saurat, J.H.; Tschopp, J.; French, L.E. Frequent downregulation of Fas (CD95) expression and function in melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2002, 12, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bromberg, J.F.; Horvath, C.M.; Wen, Z.; Schreiber, R.D.; Darnell, J.E. Transcriptionally active Stat1 is required for the antiproliferative effects of both interferon alpha and interferon gamma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 7673–7678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, X.; Fu, X.Y.; Plate, J.; Chong, A.S. IFN-gamma induces cell growth inhibition by Fas-mediated apoptosis: Requirement of STAT1 protein for up-regulation of Fas and FasL expression. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 2832–2837. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Takeda, K.; Smyth, M.J.; Cretney, E.; Hayakawa, Y.; Kayagaki, N.; Yagita, H.; Okumura, K. Critical role for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in immune surveillance against tumor development. J. Exp. Med. 2002, 195, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Fulda, S.; Debatin, K.-M. IFNγ sensitizes for apoptosis by upregulating caspase-8 expression through the Stat1 pathway. Oncogene 2002, 21, 2295–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chin, Y.E.; Kitagawa, M.; Kuida, K.; Flavell, R.A.; Fu, X.Y. Activation of the STAT signaling pathway can cause expression of caspase 1 and apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 5328–5337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kammertoens, T.; Friese, C.; Arina, A.; Idel, C.; Briesemeister, D.; Rothe, M.; Ivanov, A.; Szymborska, A.; Patone, G.; Kunz, S.; et al. Tumour ischaemia by interferon-γ resembles physiological blood vessel regression. Nature 2017, 545, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Martínez-Lostao, L.; Anel, A.; Pardo, J. How Do Cytotoxic Lymphocytes Kill Cancer Cells? Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 5047–5056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Bots, M.; Medema, J.P. Granzymes at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 5011–5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jenne, D.E.; Tschopp, J. Granzymes, a family of serine proteases released from granules of cytolytic T lymphocytes upon T cell receptor stimulation. Immunol. Rev. 1988, 103, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trapani, J.A.; Browne, K.A.; Dawson, M.; Smyth, M.J. Immunopurification of functional Asp-ase (natural killer cell granzyme B) using a monoclonal antibody. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 195, 910–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dotiwala, F.; Mulik, S.; Polidoro, R.B.; Ansara, J.A.; Burleigh, B.A.; Walch, M.; Gazzinelli, R.T.; Lieberman, J. Killer lymphocytes use granulysin, perforin and granzymes to kill intracellular parasites. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ernst, W.A.; Thoma-Uszynski, S.; Teitelbaum, R.; Ko, C.; Hanson, D.A.; Clayberger, C.; Krensky, A.M.; Leippe, M.; Bloom, B.R.; Ganz, T.; et al. Granulysin, a T Cell Product, Kills Bacteria by Altering Membrane Permeability. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 7102–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Stenger, S.; Hanson Dennis, A.; Teitelbaum, R.; Dewan, P.; Niazi Kayvan, R.; Froelich Christopher, J.; Ganz, T.; Thoma-Uszynski, S.; Melián, A.n.; Bogdan, C.; et al. An Antimicrobial Activity of Cytolytic T Cells Mediated by Granulysin. Science 1998, 282, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Law, R.H.; Lukoyanova, N.; Voskoboinik, I.; Caradoc-Davies, T.T.; Baran, K.; Dunstone, M.A.; D’Angelo, M.E.; Orlova, E.V.; Coulibaly, F.; Verschoor, S.; et al. The structural basis for membrane binding and pore formation by lymphocyte perforin. Nature 2010, 468, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lichtenheld, M.G.; Olsen, K.J.; Lu, P.; Lowrey, D.M.; Hameed, A.; Hengartner, H.; Podack, E.R. Structure and function of human perforin. Nature 1988, 335, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Osińska, I.; Popko, K.; Demkow, U. Perforin: An important player in immune response. Cent Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 39, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Odake, S.; Kam, C.M.; Narasimhan, L.; Poe, M.; Blake, J.T.; Krahenbuhl, O.; Tschopp, J.; Powers, J.C. Human and murine cytotoxic T lymphocyte serine proteases: Subsite mapping with peptide thioester substrates and inhibition of enzyme activity and cytolysis by isocoumarins. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 2217–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chowdhury, D.; Lieberman, J. Death by a thousand cuts: Granzyme pathways of programmed cell death. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 389–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Poe, M.; Blake, J.T.; Boulton, D.A.; Gammon, M.; Sigal, N.H.; Wu, J.K.; Zweerink, H.J. Human cytotoxic lymphocyte granzyme B. Its purification from granules and the characterization of substrate and inhibitor specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Turner, C.T.; Zeglinski, M.R.; Richardson, K.C.; Santacruz, S.; Hiroyasu, S.; Wang, C.; Zhao, H.; Shen, Y.; Sehmi, R.; Lima, H.; et al. Granzyme B Contributes to Barrier Dysfunction in Oxazolone-Induced Skin Inflammation through E-Cadherin and FLG Cleavage. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 141, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hiroyasu, S.; Hiroyasu, A.; Granville, D.J.; Tsuruta, D. Pathological functions of granzyme B in inflammatory skin diseases. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2021, 104, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zeglinski, M.R.; Granville, D.J. Granzymes in cardiovascular injury and disease. Cell. Signal. 2020, 76, 109804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Thomas, H.E.; Trapani, J.A.; Kay, T.W.H. The role of perforin and granzymes in diabetes. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17, 577–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Garzón-Tituaña, M.; Arias, M.A.; Sierra-Monzón, J.L.; Morte-Romea, E.; Santiago, L.; Ramirez-Labrada, A.; Martinez-Lostao, L.; Paño-Pardo, J.R.; Galvez, E.M.; Pardo, J. The Multifaceted Function of Granzymes in Sepsis: Some Facts and a Lot to Discover. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hiroyasu, S.; Zeglinski, M.R.; Zhao, H.; Pawluk, M.A.; Turner, C.T.; Kasprick, A.; Tateishi, C.; Nishie, W.; Burleigh, A.; Lennox, P.A.; et al. Granzyme B inhibition reduces disease severity in autoimmune blistering diseases. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baker, E.; Sayers, T.J.; Sutherland, G.R.; Smyth, M.J. The genes encoding NK cell granule serine proteases, human tryptase-2 (TRYP2) and human granzyme A (HFSP), both map to chromosome 5q11-q12 and define a new locus for cytotoxic lymphocyte granule tryptases. Immunogenetics 1994, 40, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, J.; Vrettou, C.; Connelley, T.; Morrison, W.I. Identification and annotation of bovine granzyme genes reveals a novel granzyme encoded within the trypsin-like locus. Immunogenetics 2018, 70, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Trapani, J.A. Granzymes: A family of lymphocyte granule serine proteases. Genome Biol. 2001, 2, Reviews3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, X. The inducers of immunogenic cell death for tumor immunotherapy. Tumori 2018, 104, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Serrano-del Valle, A.; Anel, A.; Naval, J.; Marzo, I. Immunogenic Cell Death and Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Galluzzi, L.; Garg, A.D. Immunology of Cell Death in Cancer Immunotherapy. Cells 2021, 10, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Messmer, M.N.; Snyder, A.G.; Oberst, A. Comparing the effects of different cell death programs in tumor progression and immunotherapy. Cell Death Differ. 2019, 26, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van Hoecke, L.; Van Lint, S.; Roose, K.; Van Parys, A.; Vandenabeele, P.; Grooten, J.; Tavernier, J.; De Koker, S.; Saelens, X. Treatment with mRNA coding for the necroptosis mediator MLKL induces antitumor immunity directed against neo-epitopes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Cullen, S.P.; Adrain, C.; Lüthi, A.U.; Duriez, P.J.; Martin, S.J. Human and murine granzyme B exhibit divergent substrate preferences. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhou, Z.; He, H.; Wang, K.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Su, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, W.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Granzyme A from cytotoxic lymphocytes cleaves GSDMB to trigger pyroptosis in target cells. Science 2020, 368, eaaz7548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Beresford, P.J.; Kam, C.M.; Powers, J.C.; Lieberman, J. Recombinant human granzyme A binds to two putative HLA-associated proteins and cleaves one of them. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 9285–9290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Fan, Z.; Beresford, P.J.; Oh, D.Y.; Zhang, D.; Lieberman, J. Tumor suppressor NM23-H1 is a granzyme A-activated DNase during CTL-mediated apoptosis, and the nucleosome assembly protein SET is its inhibitor. Cell 2003, 112, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Irmler, M.; Hertig, S.; MacDonald, H.R.; Sadoul, R.; Becherer, J.D.; Proudfoot, A.; Solari, R.; Tschopp, J. Granzyme A is an interleukin 1 beta-converting enzyme. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 181, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Martinvalet, D.; Dykxhoorn, D.M.; Ferrini, R.; Lieberman, J. Granzyme A Cleaves a Mitochondrial Complex I Protein to Initiate Caspase-Independent Cell Death. Cell 2008, 133, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Fan, Z.; Beresford, P.J.; Zhang, D.; Lieberman, J. HMG2 interacts with the nucleosome assembly protein SET and is a target of the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protease granzyme A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 2810–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Fan, Z.; Beresford, P.J.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Z.; Novina, C.D.; Yoshida, A.; Pommier, Y.; Lieberman, J. Cleaving the oxidative repair protein Ape1 enhances cell death mediated by granzyme A. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Johnson, H.; Scorrano, L.; Korsmeyer, S.J.; Ley, T.J. Cell death induced by granzyme C. Blood 2003, 101, 3093–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Shi, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, S.; Fan, Z. Granzyme F induces a novel death pathway characterized by Bid-independent cytochrome c release without caspase activation. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16, 1694–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, D.; Yu, J.; Zhang, L. Necroptosis: An alternative cell death program defending against cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1865, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Leist, M.; Single, B.; Castoldi, A.F.; Kühnle, S.; Nicotera, P. Intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration: A switch in the decision between apoptosis and necrosis. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 185, 1481–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bovenschen, N.; Quadir, R.; van den Berg, A.L.; Brenkman, A.B.; Vandenberghe, I.; Devreese, B.; Joore, J.; Kummer, J.A. Granzyme K Displays Highly Restricted Substrate Specificity That Only Partially Overlaps with Granzyme A*. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 3504–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhao, T.; Zhang, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Hua, G.; Lu, H.; Hou, Q.; Liu, H.; Fan, Z. Granzyme K cleaves the nucleosome assembly protein SET to induce single-stranded DNA nicks of target cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Plasman, K.; Demol, H.; Bird, P.I.; Gevaert, K.; Van Damme, P. Substrate Specificities of the Granzyme Tryptases A and K. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 6067–6077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bouwman, A.C.; van Daalen, K.R.; Crnko, S.; ten Broeke, T.; Bovenschen, N. Intracellular and Extracellular Roles of Granzyme K. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guo, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhao, T.; Fan, Z. Granzyme K degrades the redox/DNA repair enzyme Ape1 to trigger oxidative stress of target cells leading to cytotoxicity. Mol. Immunol. 2008, 45, 2225–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cullen, S.P.; Afonina, I.S.; Donadini, R.; Lüthi, A.U.; Medema, J.P.; Bird, P.I.; Martin, S.J. Nucleophosmin is cleaved and inactivated by the cytotoxic granule protease granzyme M during natural killer cell-mediated killing. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 5137–5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, S.; Xia, P.; Shi, L.; Fan, Z. FADD cleavage by NK cell granzyme M enhances its self-association to facilitate procaspase-8 recruitment for auto-processing leading to caspase cascade. Cell Death Differ. 2012, 19, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Hu, D.; Liu, S.; Shi, L.; Li, C.; Wu, L.; Fan, Z. Cleavage of survivin by Granzyme M triggers degradation of the survivin-X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) complex to free caspase activity leading to cytolysis of target tumor cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 18326–18335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lu, H.; Hou, Q.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, L.; Fan, Z. Granzyme M directly cleaves inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase (CAD) to unleash CAD leading to DNA fragmentation. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 1171–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. de Poot, S.A.H.; Westgeest, M.; Hostetter, D.R.; van Damme, P.; Plasman, K.; Demeyer, K.; Broekhuizen, R.; Gevaert, K.; Craik, C.S.; Bovenschen, N. Human and mouse granzyme M display divergent and species-specific substrate specificities. Biochem. J. 2011, 437, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Takano, N.; Matusi, H.; Takahashi, T. Granzyme N, a Novel Granzyme, Is Expressed in Spermatocytes and Spermatids of the Mouse Testis1. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 71, 1785–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Caputo, A.; Garner, R.S.; Winkler, U.; Hudig, D.; Bleackley, R.C. Activation of recombinant murine cytotoxic cell proteinase-1 requires deletion of an amino-terminal dipeptide. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 17672–17675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dikov, M.M.; Springman, E.B.; Yeola, S.; Serafin, W.E. Processing of procarboxypeptidase A and other zymogens in murine mast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 25897–25904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Smyth, M.J.; McGuire, M.J.; Thia, K.Y. Expression of recombinant human granzyme B. A processing and activation role for dipeptidyl peptidase I. J. Immunol. 1995, 154, 6299–6305. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hedstrom, L. Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chemical Rev. 2002, 102, 4501–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sattar, R.; Ali, S.A.; Abbasi, A. Bioinformatics of granzymes: Sequence comparison and structural studies on granzyme family by homology modeling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 308, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sutton, V.R.; Waterhouse, N.J.; Browne, K.A.; Sedelies, K.; Ciccone, A.; Anthony, D.; Koskinen, A.; Mullbacher, A.; Trapani, J.A. Residual active granzyme B in cathepsin C-null lymphocytes is sufficient for perforin-dependent target cell apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Grossman, W.J.; Revell, P.A.; Lu, Z.H.; Johnson, H.; Bredemeyer, A.J.; Ley, T.J. The orphan granzymes of humans and mice. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2003, 15, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sedelies, K.A.; Sayers, T.J.; Edwards, K.M.; Chen, W.; Pellicci, D.G.; Godfrey, D.I.; Trapani, J.A. Discordant regulation of granzyme H and granzyme B expression in human lymphocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 26581–26587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Cai, S.F.; Fehniger, T.A.; Dai, X.; Cao, X.; Ley, T.J. Differential Regulation of Granzyme B and C Expression in Murine Cytotoxic T and NK Cells. Blood 2007, 110, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Waugh, K.A.; Leach, S.M.; Moore, B.L.; Bruno, T.C.; Buhrman, J.D.; Slansky, J.E. Molecular Profile of Tumor-Specific CD8+ T Cell Hypofunction in a Transplantable Murine Cancer Model. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 1477–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Arina, A.; Beckett, M.; Fernandez, C.; Zheng, W.; Pitroda, S.; Chmura, S.J.; Luke, J.J.; Forde, M.; Hou, Y.; Burnette, B.; et al. Tumor-reprogrammed resident T cells resist radiation to control tumors. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Garcia-Sanz, J.A.; MacDonald, H.R.; Jenne, D.E.; Tschopp, J.; Nabholz, M. Cell specificity of granzyme gene expression. J. Immunol. 1990, 145, 3111–3118. [Google Scholar]
  81. Lieberman, J. The ABCs of granule-mediated cytotoxicity: New weapons in the arsenal. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003, 3, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Matsubara, J.A.; Tian, Y.; Cui, J.Z.; Zeglinski, M.R.; Hiroyasu, S.; Turner, C.T.; Granville, D.J. Retinal Distribution and Extracellular Activity of Granzyme B: A Serine Protease That Degrades Retinal Pigment Epithelial Tight Junctions and Extracellular Matrix Proteins. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Buzza, M.S.; Zamurs, L.; Sun, J.; Bird, C.H.; Smith, A.I.; Trapani, J.A.; Froelich, C.J.; Nice, E.C.; Bird, P.I. Extracellular matrix remodeling by human granzyme B via cleavage of vitronectin, fibronectin, and laminin. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 23549–23558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Sharma, M.; Merkulova, Y.; Raithatha, S.; Parkinson, L.G.; Shen, Y.; Cooper, D.; Granville, D.J. Extracellular granzyme K mediates endothelial activation through the cleavage of protease-activated receptor-1. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 1734–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Heusel, J.W.; Wesselschmidt, R.L.; Shresta, S.; Russell, J.H.; Ley, T.J. Cytotoxic lymphocytes require granzyme B for the rapid induction of DNA fragmentation and apoptosis in allogeneic target cells. Cell 1994, 76, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hagn, M.; Sutton, V.R.; Trapani, J.A. A colorimetric assay that specifically measures Granzyme B proteolytic activity: Hydrolysis of Boc-Ala-Ala-Asp-S-Bzl. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 93, e52419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Pham, C.T.; Thomas, D.A.; Mercer, J.D.; Ley, T.J. Production of fully active recombinant murine granzyme B in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 1629–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Sun, J.; Bird, C.H.; Buzza, M.S.; McKee, K.E.; Whisstock, J.C.; Bird, P.I. Expression and purification of recombinant human granzyme B from Pichia pastoris. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 261, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rong, J.; Xu, X.; Ewen, C.; Bleackley, R.C.; Kane, K.P. Isolation and characterization of novel single-chain Fv specific for human granzyme B. Hybrid. Hybridomics 2004, 23, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Andrade, F.; Roy, S.; Nicholson, D.; Thornberry, N.; Rosen, A.; Casciola-Rosen, L. Granzyme B directly and efficiently cleaves several downstream caspase substrates: Implications for CTL-induced apoptosis. Immunity 1998, 8, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Yang, X.; Stennicke, H.R.; Wang, B.; Green, D.R.; Janicke, R.U.; Srinivasan, A.; Seth, P.; Salvesen, G.S.; Froelich, C.J. Granzyme B mimics apical caspases. Description of a unified pathway for trans-activation of executioner caspase-3 and -7. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 34278–34283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Sutton, V.R.; Davis, J.E.; Cancilla, M.; Johnstone, R.W.; Ruefli, A.A.; Sedelies, K.; Browne, K.A.; Trapani, J.A. Initiation of apoptosis by granzyme B requires direct cleavage of bid, but not direct granzyme B-mediated caspase activation. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Julien, O.; Wells, J.A. Caspases and their substrates. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 24, 1380–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tadokoro, D.; Takahama, S.; Shimizu, K.; Hayashi, S.; Endo, Y.; Sawasaki, T. Characterization of a caspase-3-substrate kinome using an N- and C-terminally tagged protein kinase library produced by a cell-free system. Cell Death Dis. 2010, 1, e89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wickman, G.R.; Julian, L.; Mardilovich, K.; Schumacher, S.; Munro, J.; Rath, N.; Zander, S.A.; Mleczak, A.; Sumpton, D.; Morrice, N.; et al. Blebs produced by actin–myosin contraction during apoptosis release damage-associated molecular pattern proteins before secondary necrosis occurs. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 20, 1293–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ferguson, T.A.; Herndon, J.; Elzey, B.; Griffith, T.S.; Schoenberger, S.; Green, D.R. Uptake of apoptotic antigen-coupled cells by lymphoid dendritic cells and cross-priming of CD8(+) T cells produce active immune unresponsiveness. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 5589–5595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Fadok, V.A.; Bratton, D.L.; Konowal, A.; Freed, P.W.; Westcott, J.Y.; Henson, P.M. Macrophages that have ingested apoptotic cells in vitro inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production through autocrine/paracrine mechanisms involving TGF-beta, PGE2, and PAF. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 890–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Huang, Q.; Li, F.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Shi, W.; Liu, F.F.; O’Sullivan, B.; He, Z.; Peng, Y.; Tan, A.C.; et al. Caspase 3-mediated stimulation of tumor cell repopulation during cancer radiotherapy. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 860–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bengsch, B.; Ohtani, T.; Herati, R.S.; Bovenschen, N.; Chang, K.M.; Wherry, E.J. Deep immune profiling by mass cytometry links human T and NK cell differentiation and cytotoxic molecule expression patterns. J. Immunol. Methods 2018, 453, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zou, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. An APAF-1·Cytochrome c Multimeric Complex Is a Functional Apoptosome That Activates Procaspase-9*. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 11549–11556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Saleh, A.; Srinivasula, S.M.; Acharya, S.; Fishel, R.; Alnemri, E.S. Cytochrome c and dATP-mediated Oligomerization of Apaf-1 Is a Prerequisite for Procaspase-9 Activation*. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 17941–17945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Hu, Y.; Benedict, M.A.; Ding, L.; Núñez, G. Role of cytochrome c and dATP/ATP hydrolysis in Apaf-1-mediated caspase-9 activation and apoptosis. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 3586–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cain, K.; Brown, D.G.; Langlais, C.; Cohen, G.M. Caspase Activation Involves the Formation of the Aposome, a Large (∼700 kDa) Caspase-activating Complex*. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 22686–22692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Wilson, J.A.; Prow, N.A.; Schroder, W.A.; Ellis, J.J.; Cumming, H.E.; Gearing, L.J.; Poo, Y.S.; Taylor, A.; Hertzog, P.J.; Di Giallonardo, F.; et al. RNA-Seq analysis of chikungunya virus infection and identification of granzyme A as a major promoter of arthritic inflammation. PLoS Pathogens 2017, 13, e1006155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Metkar, S.S.; Menaa, C.; Pardo, J.; Wang, B.; Wallich, R.; Freudenberg, M.; Kim, S.; Raja, S.M.; Shi, L.; Simon, M.M.; et al. Human and mouse granzyme A induce a proinflammatory cytokine response. Immunity 2008, 29, 720–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Aglietti, R.A.; Estevez, A.; Gupta, A.; Ramirez, M.G.; Liu, P.S.; Kayagaki, N.; Ciferri, C.; Dixit, V.M.; Dueber, E.C. GsdmD p30 elicited by caspase-11 during pyroptosis forms pores in membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7858–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Ding, J.; Wang, K.; Liu, W.; She, Y.; Sun, Q.; Shi, J.; Sun, H.; Wang, D.C.; Shao, F. Pore-forming activity and structural autoinhibition of the gasdermin family. Nature 2016, 535, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ruan, J.; Pan, Y.; Magupalli, V.G.; Wu, H.; Lieberman, J. Inflammasome-activated gasdermin D causes pyroptosis by forming membrane pores. Nature 2016, 535, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Duncan, J.A.; Canna, S.W. The NLRC4 Inflammasome. Immunol. Rev. 2018, 281, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Sollberger, G.; Strittmatter, G.E.; Garstkiewicz, M.; Sand, J.; Beer, H.D. Caspase-1: The inflammasome and beyond. Innate Immun. 2014, 20, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Shi, J.; Gao, W.; Shao, F. Pyroptosis: Gasdermin-Mediated Programmed Necrotic Cell Death. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Galluzzi, L.; Vitale, I.; Aaronson, S.A.; Abrams, J.M.; Adam, D.; Agostinis, P.; Alnemri, E.S.; Altucci, L.; Amelio, I.; Andrews, D.W.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 486–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Martinvalet, D.; Zhu, P.; Lieberman, J. Granzyme A induces caspase-independent mitochondrial damage, a required first step for apoptosis. Immunity 2005, 22, 355–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Zhu, P.; Zhang, D.; Chowdhury, D.; Martinvalet, D.; Keefe, D.; Shi, L.; Lieberman, J. Granzyme A, which causes single-stranded DNA damage, targets the double-strand break repair protein Ku70. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Kelly, J.M.; Waterhouse, N.J.; Cretney, E.; Browne, K.A.; Ellis, S.; Trapani, J.A.; Smyth, M.J. Granzyme M mediates a novel form of perforin-dependent cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 22236–22242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Muppidi, J.R.; Lobito, A.A.; Ramaswamy, M.; Yang, J.K.; Wang, L.; Wu, H.; Siegel, R.M. Homotypic FADD interactions through a conserved RXDLL motif are required for death receptor-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 1641–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Pegram, H.J.; Haynes, N.M.; Smyth, M.J.; Kershaw, M.H.; Darcy, P.K. Characterizing the anti-tumor function of adoptively transferred NK cells in vivo. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2010, 59, 1235–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bovenschen, N.; de Koning, P.J.A.; Quadir, R.; Broekhuizen, R.; Damen, J.M.A.; Froelich, C.J.; Slijper, M.; Kummer, J.A. NK Cell Protease Granzyme M Targets α-Tubulin and Disorganizes the Microtubule Network. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 8184–8191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhao, T.; Zhang, H.; Guo, Y.; Fan, Z. Granzyme K directly processes bid to release cytochrome c and endonuclease G leading to mitochondria-dependent cell death. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 12104–12111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Joeckel, L.T.; Wallich, R.; Martin, P.; Sanchez-Martinez, D.; Weber, F.C.; Martin, S.F.; Borner, C.; Pardo, J.; Froelich, C.; Simon, M.M. Mouse granzyme K has pro-inflammatory potential. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 1112–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Green, D.R.; Ferguson, T.; Zitvogel, L.; Kroemer, G. Immunogenic and tolerogenic cell death. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Kaczmarek, A.; Vandenabeele, P.; Krysko, D.V. Necroptosis: The release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity 2013, 38, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Fellows, E.; Gil-Parrado, S.; Jenne, D.E.; Kurschus, F.C. Natural killer cell–derived human granzyme H induces an alternative, caspase-independent cell-death program. Blood 2007, 110, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hou, Q.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, H.; Lu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, L.; Fan, Z. Granzyme H induces apoptosis of target tumor cells characterized by DNA fragmentation and Bid-dependent mitochondrial damage. Mol. Immunol. 2008, 45, 1044–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 01833 g001 550
Figure 1. Gzm sequence homology and predicted relationships within this class of proteases. Alignments generated using Clustal Omega [.tar.gz (1.2.4)]. (A) The dendrogram depicts predicted phylogenetic relationships based on protein sequences of all mouse and human Gzms. (B) This table shows the percentage each mouse Gzm is homologous with every other mouse Gzm; similarity increases as the color trend green and decreases as the color tends red.
Figure 1. Gzm sequence homology and predicted relationships within this class of proteases. Alignments generated using Clustal Omega [.tar.gz (1.2.4)]. (A) The dendrogram depicts predicted phylogenetic relationships based on protein sequences of all mouse and human Gzms. (B) This table shows the percentage each mouse Gzm is homologous with every other mouse Gzm; similarity increases as the color trend green and decreases as the color tends red.
Ijms 23 01833 g001
Ijms 23 01833 g002 550
Figure 2. Protein sequence alignment of selected Gzms. Alignments were generated using Snapgene’s MUSCLE alignment and ordered based on species and chromosomal location. A consensus sequence, shown in black above each individual Gzm sequence, is given when there was 60% or greater consensus amongst Gzms examined. Comparing select Gzms from the human and mouse Gzm B locus (A) or comparing all mouse Gzms (B), there is considerable similarity between each Gzm sequence examined, but the differences observed change the substrates of individual Gzm and their cytotoxic activity. Annotations in both (A,B) mark the same features. Line 1 indicates the leader sequence and line 2 indicates the dipeptide that is cleaved to fully activate each individual Gzm. The box marked 3 is the start of the active enzyme, and this “IIGG” sequence is highly conserved amongst all Gzm. Highly conserved disulfide bonds are marked with a double line beneath the cystine residues that form the bonds, and stretching between cystine residues, that comprise the bonds where possible. These disulfide bonds form variable loops that are critical to the structure and function of each Gzm. The three highly conserved residues making up the catalytic triad are marked with a black circle above the conversed residues symbol, histidine (H), aspartic acid (D), and serine (S). The catalytic triad participates in the active site of all Gzms, which is located at the junction of two beta-sheet domains. Box 4 indicates the substrate binding subsite 1, which contains a critical functional motif for substrate binding specificity shown within the dotted box. The Gzm B locus Gzms have a conserved tyrosine (Y) as the central residue in this motif, whereas other Gzms have less restriction.
Figure 2. Protein sequence alignment of selected Gzms. Alignments were generated using Snapgene’s MUSCLE alignment and ordered based on species and chromosomal location. A consensus sequence, shown in black above each individual Gzm sequence, is given when there was 60% or greater consensus amongst Gzms examined. Comparing select Gzms from the human and mouse Gzm B locus (A) or comparing all mouse Gzms (B), there is considerable similarity between each Gzm sequence examined, but the differences observed change the substrates of individual Gzm and their cytotoxic activity. Annotations in both (A,B) mark the same features. Line 1 indicates the leader sequence and line 2 indicates the dipeptide that is cleaved to fully activate each individual Gzm. The box marked 3 is the start of the active enzyme, and this “IIGG” sequence is highly conserved amongst all Gzm. Highly conserved disulfide bonds are marked with a double line beneath the cystine residues that form the bonds, and stretching between cystine residues, that comprise the bonds where possible. These disulfide bonds form variable loops that are critical to the structure and function of each Gzm. The three highly conserved residues making up the catalytic triad are marked with a black circle above the conversed residues symbol, histidine (H), aspartic acid (D), and serine (S). The catalytic triad participates in the active site of all Gzms, which is located at the junction of two beta-sheet domains. Box 4 indicates the substrate binding subsite 1, which contains a critical functional motif for substrate binding specificity shown within the dotted box. The Gzm B locus Gzms have a conserved tyrosine (Y) as the central residue in this motif, whereas other Gzms have less restriction.
Ijms 23 01833 g002
Ijms 23 01833 g003 550
Figure 3. Gzm processing in cytotoxic T cells. Gzms are produced as zymogens with a leader sequence and dipeptide on the amino-terminus, which holds the Gzms in an enzymatically inactive conformation. (1) Gzms are transported and stored cytotoxic granules and their leader sequence is cleaved leaving behind a dipeptide. (2) In the cytotoxic granule cathepsins, a class of proteases present in lysosomes and cytotoxic granules, cleave the N-terminal dipeptide from the Gzms, converting them to their active conformation. (3) Gzms are stored in their active conformation in the cytotoxic granules until their release along with perforin, which mediates entry of Gzms through the target cell membrane into target cell cytosol. (4) Upon TCR activation the cytotoxic granules are released towards the immunologic synapse. Perforin mediates entry of Gzms into the cytosol of target cells where Gzms can initiate they cytotoxic activity.
Figure 3. Gzm processing in cytotoxic T cells. Gzms are produced as zymogens with a leader sequence and dipeptide on the amino-terminus, which holds the Gzms in an enzymatically inactive conformation. (1) Gzms are transported and stored cytotoxic granules and their leader sequence is cleaved leaving behind a dipeptide. (2) In the cytotoxic granule cathepsins, a class of proteases present in lysosomes and cytotoxic granules, cleave the N-terminal dipeptide from the Gzms, converting them to their active conformation. (3) Gzms are stored in their active conformation in the cytotoxic granules until their release along with perforin, which mediates entry of Gzms through the target cell membrane into target cell cytosol. (4) Upon TCR activation the cytotoxic granules are released towards the immunologic synapse. Perforin mediates entry of Gzms into the cytosol of target cells where Gzms can initiate they cytotoxic activity.
Ijms 23 01833 g003
Ijms 23 01833 g004 550
Figure 4. Gzm protein expression within hematopoietic cells as determined by mass spectrometry. Using the Immunological proteomic resource (ImmPRes), an open access proteomic database of murine immune cell populations generated using large scale quantitative mass-spectrometry, we examined Gzm expression within hematopoietic cells. Identification of protein expression utilized data-dependent acquisition tandem mass spectrometry. Copy number refers to the average protein concentration per cell. From this dataset we have found that GzmB seems to have the most diverse expression within different cell types examined and is often the most abundant Gzm. Other Gzms have more unique expression patterns and are only expressed on a smaller subset of the immune cells examined. Critically, T cell expression of most Gzms seems to be dependent on their activation status.
Figure 4. Gzm protein expression within hematopoietic cells as determined by mass spectrometry. Using the Immunological proteomic resource (ImmPRes), an open access proteomic database of murine immune cell populations generated using large scale quantitative mass-spectrometry, we examined Gzm expression within hematopoietic cells. Identification of protein expression utilized data-dependent acquisition tandem mass spectrometry. Copy number refers to the average protein concentration per cell. From this dataset we have found that GzmB seems to have the most diverse expression within different cell types examined and is often the most abundant Gzm. Other Gzms have more unique expression patterns and are only expressed on a smaller subset of the immune cells examined. Critically, T cell expression of most Gzms seems to be dependent on their activation status.
Ijms 23 01833 g004
Ijms 23 01833 g005 550
Figure 5. The different pathways of Gzm-mediated cytotoxicity. CTL degranulate towards the immunological synapse, releasing perforin and Gzms. Perforin forms pores in target cell membranes and facilities Gzm entry into the cytosol of target cells. Once in the cytosol each Gzm acts upon unique substrates to initiate their divergent functions. Gzm A and K have been shown to be largely inflammatory, and their primary function may be to induce release of inflammatory cytokines rather than directly inducing cell death. Gzm F is shown to induce rupture of the cellular membrane through an unknown mechanism that closely resembles necroptotic cell death. Gzm C also induces rupture of the cell membrane through an unknown mechanism and induces other unique cytotoxic changes. Gzm M can act directly on microtubule substrates. Gzm B induces apoptosis by acting directly on caspases. Gzms can be produced simultaneously by the same cell, but many of them are highly transcriptionally regulated in the T cell, so multiple of these pathways can be activated at the same time, depending on the T cells specific expression of each Gzm.
Figure 5. The different pathways of Gzm-mediated cytotoxicity. CTL degranulate towards the immunological synapse, releasing perforin and Gzms. Perforin forms pores in target cell membranes and facilities Gzm entry into the cytosol of target cells. Once in the cytosol each Gzm acts upon unique substrates to initiate their divergent functions. Gzm A and K have been shown to be largely inflammatory, and their primary function may be to induce release of inflammatory cytokines rather than directly inducing cell death. Gzm F is shown to induce rupture of the cellular membrane through an unknown mechanism that closely resembles necroptotic cell death. Gzm C also induces rupture of the cell membrane through an unknown mechanism and induces other unique cytotoxic changes. Gzm M can act directly on microtubule substrates. Gzm B induces apoptosis by acting directly on caspases. Gzms can be produced simultaneously by the same cell, but many of them are highly transcriptionally regulated in the T cell, so multiple of these pathways can be activated at the same time, depending on the T cells specific expression of each Gzm.
Ijms 23 01833 g005
Table
Table 1. Granzyme chromosomal location and size in mice (A) and humans (B) 1.
Table 1. Granzyme chromosomal location and size in mice (A) and humans (B) 1.
(A)
ChromosomeLocationLength within Genome (bp)
Gzm K13 cchr13:113,308,172-113,317,4319260
Gzm A13 cchr13:113,230,361-113,237,5157155
Gzm B14 cchr14:56,496,295-56,499,7173423
Gzm C14 cchr14:56,468,898-56,472,1133216
Gzm F14 cchr14:56,442,720-56,448,8746155
Gzm N14 cchr14:56,403,254-56,412,0568803
Gzm G14 cchr14:56,394,039-56,397,0362998
Gzm D14 cchr14:56,367,013-56,370,0653053
Gzm E14 cchr14:56,355,083-56,358,0823000
Gzm M10 cchr10:79,524,854-79,531,0956242
(B)
ChromosomeLocationLength within Genome (bp)
Gzm K5chr5:55,024,256-55,034,57010,315
Gzm A5chr5:55,102,646-55,110,2527607
Gzm B14 cchr14:24,630,954-24,634,1903237
Gzm H14 cchr14:24,606,480-24,609,6853206
Gzm M19 cchr19:544,053-549,9225870
1 Gzms are clustered on 3 different chromosomes, the Gzm A locus (blue), the Gzm B locus (orange), and the Gzm M locus (gray). Genome data was extracted from the UCSC genome browser using the Mouse Jun 2020 GRCm39/mm39 assembly and the Human Dec 2013 GRCh38/hg38 assembly. Gzms located on the complementary strand of the chromosome are identified with a “c” in the chromosome column.
Table
Table 2. Substrates and functions of all mouse Gzms and human homologues if known 1.
Table 2. Substrates and functions of all mouse Gzms and human homologues if known 1.
Known SubstratesFunction
Gzm A *Gasdermin B [47], SET [48,49], pro–IL-1β [50], NDUFS3 [51], histone H1 [52], HMGB2 [52], and ApeI [53]Gzm A’s primary role is to activate and release pro-inflammatory cytokines from target cells.
Mouse and human Gzm A induces pyroptosis in human cells through the cleavage and activation of human gasdermin B (there is no known mouse homologue for gasdermin B) [47]. Additionally, Gzm A can target multiple nuclear and mitochondrial targets that likely contribute to its specific form of caspase-independent cytotoxicity.
Gzm B *Mouse and Human: pro-caspase 3, pro-caspase 7
Human only: Bid, inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase (ICAD), pro-caspase 8 [46]		Gzm B cell death results in the activation of the caspase cascade and induction of canonical apoptosis in both mouse and humans.
Gzm COrphan (undetermined)Gzm C induces a caspase-independent form of cell death that results in single-stranded DNA nicking and mitochondrial swelling. Gzm C does not activate BID or the CAD nuclease, suggesting it has alternative targets and initiates different pathways from Gzm B [54].
Gzm DOrphan (undetermined)Undetermined
Gzm EOrphan (undetermined)Undetermined
Gzm FOrphan (undetermined)Gzm F has been suggested to induce a “necroptotic-like” form of cell death[55]. Gzm F-induced cell death is caspase-independent, induces mitochondrial damage independent of the Bid pathway, results in rupture of the cellular membrane, single stranded DNA nicking, cellular organelle damage, and extensive vacuolization of the cytoplasm [55]. This death phenotype strongly resembles necroptosis [56,57].
Gzm GOrphan (undetermined)Undetermined
Gzm K *SET [58,59], β-tubulin [60], APE1 [59,61,62]Gzm K induces single-stranded DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and cell membrane damage through a caspase-independent mechanism [58,59].
Gzm M *Human: nucleophosmin [63], FADD [64], survivin [65], ICAD [66]
Mouse and Human: alpha-Tubulin [67]		Gzm M induces apoptosis in humans though its function is undetermined in mice. Gzm M does not induce cell death in multiple mouse tumor models in vitro but mouse Gzm M can induce apoptosis in target human cancer cells in vitro [67].
Gzm NOrphan (undetermined)To our knowledge, Gzm N has not been found to be significantly expressed in T cells or other immune cells. Its expression has been found in the testes in one study, specifically in spermatocytes and spermatids, though its biological function was not determined [68].
1 Gzms without a known substrate are designated orphan and mouse Gzms with a known human homologue with the same name are marked with an asterisk.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hay, Z.L.Z.; Slansky, J.E. Granzymes: The Molecular Executors of Immune-Mediated Cytotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031833

AMA Style

Hay ZLZ, Slansky JE. Granzymes: The Molecular Executors of Immune-Mediated Cytotoxicity. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3):1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031833

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hay, Zachary L. Z., and Jill E. Slansky. 2022. "Granzymes: The Molecular Executors of Immune-Mediated Cytotoxicity" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3: 1833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031833

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop