Next Article in Journal
Antibacterial and Cytocompatible: Combining Silver Nitrate with Strontium Acetate Increases the Therapeutic Window
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Characterization and Phylogenetic Analysis of GSK Genes in Maize and Elucidation of Their General Role in Interaction with BZR1
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 15
10.3390/ijms23158057
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Integrated Analysis of Microarray, Small RNA, and Degradome Datasets Uncovers the Role of MicroRNAs in Temperature-Sensitive Genic Male Sterility in Wheat

by
Yongjie Liu
1,2,†,
Dan Li
1,3,†,
Shengquan Zhang
1,
Liping Zhang
1,2,
Jie Gong
1,2,
Yanhong Li
1,2,
Jiamin Chen
1,2,
Fengting Zhang
1,
Xiangzheng Liao
1,
Zhaobo Chen
1,
Yongbo Wang
1,
Binshuang Pang
1,2,
Jinxiu Ma
1,
Xianchao Chen
1,
Jiangang Gao
1,
Changping Zhao
1,2,* and
Shiqing Gao
1,2,*
1
Institute of Hybrid Wheat, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
2
Molecular Genetic Beijing Key Laboratory of Hybrid Wheat, Beijing 100097, China
3
College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8057; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158057
Submission received: 2 June 2022 / Revised: 10 July 2022 / Accepted: 17 July 2022 / Published: 22 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Temperature-sensitive genic male sterile (TGMS) line Beijing Sterility 366 (BS366) has been utilized in hybrid breeding for a long time, but the molecular mechanism underlying male sterility remains unclear. Expression arrays, small RNA, and degradome sequencing were used in this study to explore the potential role of miRNA in the cold-induced male sterility of BS366. Microspore observation showed defective cell plates in dyads and tetrads and shrunken microspores at the vacuolated stage. Differential regulation of Golgi vesicle transport, phragmoplast formation, sporopollenin biosynthesis, pollen exine formation, and lipid metabolism were observed between cold and control conditions. Pollen development was significantly represented in the 352 antagonistic miRNA-target pairs in the integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA profiles. The specific cleavage of ARF17 and TIR1 by miR160 and miR393 were found in the cold-treated BS366 degradome, respectively. Thus, the cold-mediated miRNAs impaired cell plate formation through repression of Golgi vesicle transport and phragmoplast formation. The repressed expression of ARF17 and TIR1 impaired pollen exine formation. The results of this study will contribute to our understanding of the roles of miRNAs in male sterility in wheat.

1. Introduction

Known as one of the most effective strategies to increase crop yield, heterosis has been widely used for crops [1]. Although male sterility is an unfavorable trait for an individual plant, it is a prerequisite for hybrid seed production and recurrent selection breeding [2]. Dozens of genic male sterile (GMS) genes have been cloned from maize, Arabidopsis, and rice, but only Ms1, Ms2, and Ms5 have been cloned from wheat [3,4,5,6]. Thus, a deep understanding of the mechanism underlying male sterility in the TGMS line will be of great value for heterosis utilization.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of ~21 nt non-coding RNAs that are important regulators ubiquitously existing in plants [7]. MiRNAs function in the posttranscriptional regulation of target gene expression via transcript cleavage or translational inhibition [8,9]. The involvement of miRNAs in plant reproductive organ development [10,11] and male sterility have been reported in plants [12,13]. Conserved miRNAs such as miR156, miR159, miR160, miR164, miR167, miR396, miR5200, and miR2275 were reported to be critical for reproductive development [14]. miR156 and its targets, the squamosa promoter-binding protein-like (SPL) genes, are highly conserved and regulate the vegetative-to-reproductive transition in plants [10]. Overexpression of soybean miR156b in Arabidopsis led to male sterility under heat stress [15]. miR159 targets GAMYB-like genes, resulting in anther defects or male sterility [16]. Overexpression of miR160 in cotton leads to anther indehiscence under high-temperature (HT) conditions, possibly due to the excessive activation of auxin signaling with the suppression of ARF10 and ARF17 [13]. In maize, zma-miR164 targets the orthologues of OsDEX1 and OsABCG15, which are key functional genes in rice anther development [17,18]. In Arabidopsis, miR167 has been reported to be important for the fertility of both ovules and anthers by targeting ARF6 and ARF8 [19]. miR172 regulates APETALA2 (AP2) and AP2-like genes. Overexpression of miR172 caused the conversion of sepals and petals into carpels and reduced the stamen number [20,21]. In addition, miR171 and miR396 are involved in floral development and male sterility by targeting scarecrow-like (SCL) and growth regulatory factor (GRF) genes [22,23].
To date, 77 mature miRNAs and 75 hairpin precursors have been registered in the miRBase for wheat (release 22). However, the microRNA population and its regulatory functions in wheat male sterility remain unclear [8,12,24]. Hence, it is of great application value and theoretical significance to explore the roles of miRNAs associated with male sterility. Beijing Sterility 366 (BS366) is a temperature-sensitive genic male sterile line (TGMS). It is male sterile at 12 °C (cold) and male fertile at 20 °C (control) with 12 h daylight. In this study, wheat genome expression arrays, small RNA, and degradome sequencing data from anthers of BS366 under control and cold conditions were used to explore the potential role of miRNA in wheat male sterility. Our results will provide novel insights into the roles of miRNAs in the male sterility of wheat.

2. Results

2.1. Pollen Development Was Defective in BS366 under Cold Conditions

Wheat TGMS line BS366 was male fertile at 20 °C but sterile at 12 °C with 12 h of daylight. Both cold- and control-treated BS366 plants appear completely normal in growth habit and vigor before anthesis. Cold-treated BS366 has exposed anthers that are indehiscent compared with BS366 under control conditions (Figure 1a,b); nearly all the pollen in cold-treated BS366 was sterile compared with 88% in the control-treated BS366 (Figure 1a). Cold-treated plants are completely male-sterile and do not produce seed.
The morphology of BS366 pollen was examined at successive developmental stages under cold and control conditions. the pollen mother cells (PMCs) of BS366 under cold conditions was the same as that under control conditions (Figure 2a,e). However, severe defects were observed in some dyads and tetrads, with a defective cell plate in the cold-treated BS366 (Figure 2b,c,f,g). Dyads and tetrads that lacked smooth cell plates were unable to produce uninucleate pollen grains. Although pollen grains at the early uninucleate stages were normal for BS366 under cold conditions (Figure 2d,h), the pollen grains shrank severely from the vacuolated stage to the mature stage (Figure 2i,m). Compared with the control-treated BS366 (Figure 2j,k), no starch accumulated inside the microspore, and a smaller nucleus without generative and vegetative cells was observed (Figure 2n,o). The cold-treated pollen grains could not be stained by I2-KI like the normal pollen (Figure 2l,p).

2.2. Construction of the Co-Expression Network for All of the Expressed Genes

To understand the gene regulatory network and identify genes responding to cold treatment in BS366, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) algorithms were carried out for all of the expressed probes. In total, 16,246 expressed probes were used to construct co-expression modules. The flashClust tools package was used to perform the cluster analysis (Figure S1). Before WGCNA, network topology analysis for various soft thresholding powers was carried out to determine the candidate power values for relative, balanced scale independence, and mean connectivity in WGCNA. As shown in Figure S2, the scale independence reached 0.85 when the power value was 13. Thus, a power value of 13 was selected to produce a hierarchical clustering tree for the expressed probes (Figure 3). Finally, 16,318 probes were assigned to 18 expression modules. The number of probes for each module ranged from 50 to 3813 (Table S1). The correlation of different modules is shown in Figure S3. Among the 18 modules, probes in blue, brown, yellow, and turquoise made up the majority (72%) of all the expressed probes.

2.3. Expression and Function Analysis of Genes in the Blue and Brown Modules

The expression of genes assigned to the blue and brown modules was opposite. There were 3506 probes assigned to the blue module, in which probes were suppressed under cold (A/B) conditions but induced under control (E/F) conditions during stages 2.2, 2.5, and 3.0 (Figure 4a). In total, 3105 probes were assigned to the brown module, in which probes were expressed at higher levels during stages 2.2, 2.5, and 3.0 under cold (A/B) conditions than under control (E/F) conditions (Figure 4b). After converting the probe IDs to gene IDs, gene ontology (GO) analysis was carried out for the genes assigned to both modules. Genes in the blue module were mainly enriched in biological processes such as carbohydrate metabolic process, ATP metabolic process, nucleotide phosphorylation, vacuolar transport, Golgi organization, and lipid oxidation (Figure 4c and Supplementary Table S2). As shown in Figure 4d and Supplementary Table S2, biological processes including mRNA splicing via spliceosome, microtubule cytoskeleton organization, nuclear division, and nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process, were significantly represented for genes in the brown module. The correlations of the genes in both modules were used to construct the co-expression network. Networks for the top 200 correlations were constructed using ClueGO in Cytoscape. In the blue module, three genes involved in lipid metabolism (LTPG6, lipase, and LTP2), one gene (ACIP1) encoding a microtubule-associated protein, and one gene encoding a NF-YC4 transcription factor were among the top ten hub genes (Figure 4e). In the brown module, genes encoding three histone proteins, one LTP protein, and one NAC transcription factor were among the top ten hub genes (Figure 4f).

2.4. The Differentially Expressed Genes between Cold and Control Conditions

To explore the expression changes of genes under cold conditions, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between A/E and B/F were identified for five development stages. The common DEGs for A vs. E and B vs. F comparisons were identified. There are 231, 164, 1581, 1897, and 3412 DEGs common to the A vs. E and B vs. F groups at five successive stages (Figure 5a). The number of downregulated genes was greater than that of upregulated genes at all five stages except stage 3.0. The number of DEGs between cold and control conditions increased noticeably from the 2.2 stage (Figure 5b). A heatmap of all the DEGs between cold and control conditions at five stages is shown in Figure 5c. These results may indicate that three later stages may be more important for the pollen viability of BS366. Thus, GO and KEGG analysis were carried out for DEGs at these development stages.
As shown in Figure 6a, the pollen and anther cutin development processes differed between cold and control conditions as early as stage 2.2. Biological processes such as the sporopollenin biosynthetic process, pollen exine formation, and pollen wall assembly were significantly represented at stage 2.2. KEGG analysis revealed that the enrichment of cutin, suberine, and wax biosynthesis pathway was first observed at stage 2.2. Aside from processes mentioned above, phragmoplast and cell plate formation-related processes, such as microtubule-based movement, microtubule motor activity, motor activity, microtubule binding, and tubulin binding were also first observed at stage 2.2. The significant enrichment of the lipid metabolism pathway was first observed at stage 2.5 in the KEGG analysis. Biological processes such as the fatty acid metabolic process, fatty acid synthase activity, and CoA-ligase activity were significantly represented at stage 3.0. KEGG analysis revealed that pathways involved in lipid metabolism, fatty acid biosynthesis, and fatty acid degradation were significantly represented at stage 3.0.

2.5. Differential Expression of Genic Male Sterility Genes

To date, more than one hundred GMS genes have been cloned from other plants [25]. The expression patterns of wheat orthologues of these GMS genes were analyzed in this study. For example, TaTDF1-4D encodes an R2R3-MYB transcription factor; TaMMD1-4D encodes a PHD domain-containing protein; and TaUDT-1D, TaAMS-6A, TaAMS-6B, and TaAMS-6D encode bHLH transcription factors. TaUDT1-2D was significantly repressed by cold treatment during stage 3.0, while TaTDF1-4D and TaMMD1-4D were induced by cold treatment during stage 3.0. The expression of TaAMS-6A and TaAMS-6B was downregulated at stage 1.5 but upregulated at stage 3.0 under cold conditions. TaMMD1-3D was only induced by cold treatment during stage 3.0. The expression of TaGPAT6-3B was repressed during the two late stages, but TaGPAT6-3A was only suppressed during stage 3.0. CalS5 encodes a callose synthase [26], and KNS4 encodes a type II arabinogalactan β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferase [27]. RPG1 encodes a sugar transporter in Arabidopsis [28]. In this study, TaCalS5-7B, TaKNS4-3B, and TaKNS4-3D were all induced during stages 2.5 and 3.0, but TaRPG1-7D was repressed during stages 2.5 and 3.0 under cold conditions (Figure 7a). The expression of several GMS genes was validated using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT–PCR) during the pollen mother cell (PMC) stage, meiosis stage, uninucleate stage, and vacuolated stage under both cold and control conditions. The expression of TaTDF-4D was significantly induced at both the PMC and vacuolated stage but repressed at the meiosis and uninucleate stages. TaTDR-7D was significantly induced at the meiosis stage but repressed at two latter stages. The expression of TaGPAT6-3B and TaDTC-5D was repressed at the meiosis stage but induced at the vacuolated stage. TaMIL-2D was significantly repressed at two early stages, but finally induced at the vacuolated stage under cold conditions. Both TaKNS4-1B and TaAMS-6A were significantly induced at the PMC stage, but they were repressed under cold conditions at the vacuolated and uninucleate stages, respectively. (Figure 7b).

2.6. Mapping of sRNA Reads to the Reference Genome

After filtering and quality control of the raw reads, a total of 77,531,794 clean tags were generated for seven libraries, with an average of 11,075,970 reads per library. Reads from seven libraries were mapped to the wheat genome (IWGSC RefSeq v1.1), and the underlying gene annotation was used to assign reads to the respective gene models (ftp://ftp.ensemblgenomes.org/pub/plants/release-44/gff3/triticum_aestivum, accessed on 12 August 2020). Finally, 87.51% (77,531,794/67,862,447) of the reads were mapped to the genome. A total of 31,670,965 reads were uniquely mapped to the genome, with a unique mapping rate of 33.98% (Table S3). The length distribution of the tags across all of the libraries was analyzed. The most abundant siRNAs were 21- and 24-nt lengths, with the highest percentages of 25.39% and 65.79% in libraries T0 and A1.5, respectively (Figure S4). All of the aligned read sequences were then annotated by reference to the Rfam database (version 11.0, http://rfam.xfam.org/, accessed on 12 August 2020) and GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 12 August 2020), which allowed for the removal of rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA sequences (Figure S5); the remaining tags were used to query the wheat and other plant miRNAs in miRBase.
Finally, this analysis yielded 510 already documented miRNAs (known miRNAs), including 108 wheat miRNAs and 402 miRNAs in other plants. There were 413 and 420 known miRNAs expressed in cold (A) and control conditions (E), respectively (Figure S6). Under cold conditions, 270 known miRNAs were commonly expressed during stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0. There were 19, 36, and 37 known miRNAs specific to stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively. Under control conditions, 250 known miRNAs were expressed during all three stages. There were 30, 49, and 28 known miRNAs exclusively expressed during stages 1.5, 2.2 and 3.0, respectively. Among the top 100 expressed miRNAs, there were miRNAs from the miR156, miR159, miR165, miR166, miR167, miR171, miR172, miR2118, miR319, miR396, tae-miR156, tae-miR159, tae-miR164, tae-miR167, and tae-miR171 miRNA families (Supplementary Table S4). These results indicate that these highly expressed miRNAs may be involved in anther development in wheat. After blasting against miRNAs in miRBase, reads with no homology to any previously known miRNA/pre-miRNA were used to predicate the novel miRNAs using MIREAP. Finally, 4478 novel miRNAs were predicted in seven libraries, including 4264, 4206 and 3797 for the cold, control, and T0 samples, respectively (Figure S6). Under cold conditions, there were 2554 novel miRNAs expressed in common during the three stages, with 113, 211, and 252 specific to stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively. In the control samples, there were 2312 novel miRNAs expressed in common during the three stages, with 246, 250, and 231 specific to stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively (Figure S6).

2.7. Differentially Expressed miRNA Identification, Target Prediction and Function Analysis

To identify cold-responsive miRNAs during anther development, the expression levels of the miRNAs were compared within/between the cold and control conditions. The differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were processed using the criteria of |fold change| > 2 and p value < 0.05. In total, 1177 and 1206 DEMs were identified between adjacent stages for cold and control conditions, respectively. There were 1119 DEMs between the cold and control conditions for the three stages. There were 388 DEMs common to the three sections, with 328, 342, and 180 DEMs specific to the control, cold and cold vs. control sections, respectively (Figure 8a). A large proportion of DEMs (939/1119) between cold and control conditions were also differentially expressed under cold or control conditions. There were 510, 439, and 436 DEMs between the two conditions during stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively (Figure 8a). The number of DEMs upregulated under cold conditions during the three stages varied, with stage 2.2 having the most DEMs (306) and stage 1.5 having the fewest DEMs (98) (Figure 8b). Compared with 417 DEMs during stage 1.5, only 133 DEMs and 193 DEMs were downregulated during stages 2.2 and 3.0. The expression heatmap showed that three samples under cold conditions clustered together and differed from the 2.2 and 3.0 stages under control conditions (Figure 8c). Several conserved miRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between the two conditions. For example, miR160a-3p and miR160d-3p were consistently differentially expressed during all three stages. The expression of miR2275b significantly differed from that of miR2275b-5p during stages 2.2 and 3.0. Compared to the control conditions, miR319-5p and miR167e-3p were induced, while miR159a and miR167f-3p were repressed during stages 2.2 and 3.0 under cold conditions (Figure 8d). miR164b-3p showed higher expression levels during stage 1.5 under cold conditions. The expression levels of miR319a and miR319p were higher during stages 2.2 and 3.0 under cold conditions, respectively.
The candidate target prediction was processed using psRobot (http://omicslab.genetics.ac.cn/psRobot/, accessed on 12 August 2020) and TargetFinder (http://jcclab.science.oregonstate.edu/node/view/56334, accessed on 12 August 2020). Targets predicted by both methods were used as the final targets for miRNAs. Among the 1119 DEMs between two conditions, 887 miRNAs were found to have corresponding target genes. In total, 13,026 miRNA-target pairs were found, corresponding to 7158 genes. Among the DEMs with target genes, 738 of the 887 genes had more than one target. A total of 3068 of 7160 targets were predicted to be targeted by more than one miRNA. A total of 4604 miRNA-target pairs were identified for the known miRNAs, corresponding to 3555 candidate genes and 201 known DEMs (Supplementary Table S5).
To gain an overview of the function of the DEMs between cold and control conditions, GO analysis was carried out for the 3555 targets. Biological processes including lignin catabolic process, phenylpropanoid catabolic process, microsporogenesis, and anther wall tapetum morphogenesis were significantly represented. In the cellular component category, Golgi apparatus-related GO terms were represented. Cellular components such as the cell plate, CCAAT-binding factor complex, and nucleus were significantly represented (Figure 8e). All of these results indicate that miRNAs may mediate male sterility in BS366 through regulating the cell plate, Golgi network, lignin catabolic process, phenylpropanoid catabolic process, and anther wall tapetum morphogenesis.
To study the potential interconnection between conserved known DEMs, expression correlation analysis (Pearson correlation) was carried out for those miRNAs mentioned above. As shown in Figure S7, high correlation was observed between some miRNA families. The miR2275, miR319, and miR156 families are highly correlated with all the miRNA families in this analysis (|Pearson correlation coefficient| > 0.8). The miRNAs from the miR159 family were highly correlated with miRNAs from the miR156, miR165, miR169, miR2275, and miR319 families. The miRNAs from the miR160 family were highly correlated with miRNAs from the miR169, miR2275, and miR319 families. The miRNAs of the miR165 family are highly correlated with all the miRNA families except miR167, miR391, miR171, and miR396. miR167 was highly correlated with the miR2275 and miR319 families. Expression of miRNAs including miR159a, miR319-5p, miR167e-3p, and miR2275b-5p decreased at the late stages. These results suggested that the expression of those miRNAs might be repressed by other miRNAs. As shown in Figure S7, miR159a was negatively correlated with miR156d-3p, miR165b-5p, miR2275a-3p, and miR319p. The expression of miR2275b-5p was negatively correlated with that of miR167f-3p, miR2275b, tae-miR2275-3p, and tae-miR396-5p. miR167e-3p was negatively correlated with miR2275b, tae-miR2275-3p, and tae-miR396-5p. Thus, we may conclude that a potential interconnection among those miRNAs exists.

2.8. The Antagonistic miRNA–Target Pairs Identified during Three Stages

To explore the role of miRNAs in the expression of their candidate target genes, an integrated analysis was performed for the miRNA sequencing and array expression data. The differentially expressed targets and DEMs were identified during respective stages. Finally, 634 differentially expressed miRNA–target pairs (both the targets and miRNAs were differentially expressed) were found, with 84, 304, and 295 miRNA–target pairs for stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively (Figure 9a and Supplementary Table S6). miRNAs usually work by cleaving their targets; thus, the expression of miRNAs and their corresponding target genes would be negatively correlated. Finally, 352 antagonistic miRNA–target pairs were identified, with 29, 161, and 172 pairs for stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively (Figure 9b and Supplementary Table S6). More antagonistic miRNA–mRNA pairs were observed for stages 2.2 and 3.0. Only one miRNA–target pair was in common during stages 1.5 and 3.0, but nine common miRNA–target pairs were found for stages 2.2 and 3.0. The expression patterns of all of the antagonistic expressed miRNA–target pairs are shown in Figure 9c. Finally, 138 DEMs and 206 putative target genes were included to form 352 negative miRNA–target pairs (Supplementary Table S6). GO analysis of the 206 targets revealed that biological processes such as carbohydrate catabolic process, microgametogenesis, gametophyte development, and pollen development were significantly represented (Figure 9d and Supplementary Table S7).
In the network of genetic regulation in organisms, the role of TFs is to regulate mRNA transcription, while the function of miRNAs is to regulate the stability of mRNAs and affect their translation after transcription. Among the 352 opposite miRNA–target pairs, miRNA–TF pairs were identified for three stages (Figure 10 and Supplementary Table S6). At stage 3.0, upregulated miR167e-3p repressed the expression of ARF16 (TraesCS7D02G161900); the expression of the Tify transcription factor (TraesCS4D02G295900) was repressed by the upregulated miR5568c-3p; downregulation of miR1130 induced the expression of genes encoding WRKY34 (TraesCS4A02G193600) and bZIP (TraesCS2B02G113200). The downregulation of miR6224a-3p and miR8612 induced the expression of PHD transcription factor (TraesCS2A02G312700) and bHLH transcription factor (TraesCS2B02G289900), respectively. Downregulated novel-m1862-3p induced the expression of a TaGAMYB-like gene, an orthologue of HvGAMYB (TraesCS3A02G336500) at stages 1.5 and 3.0. In addition, the downregulated miR159a induced the expression of TaMYB65 (TraesCS1D02G307500, an orthologue of MYB65 in Arabidopsis) during stage 2.2.
Orthologues of GMS genes with potential roles in male sterility were also found in the negative miRNA–target pairs (Supplementary Table S6 and Figure 10). TaDPW2 (TraesCS2B02G215000, an orthologue of OsDPW2) was negatively regulated by miR5281b during stage 1.5. During stage 3.0, TaMMD1 (TraesCS4D02G050000, an orthologue of MMD1 in Arabidopsis) was negatively regulated by novel-m0652-5p. The expression of several miRNAs together with their target genes was studied using qRT–PCR (Figure 11). The expression of tae-miR156 was induced at all stages, but significantly induced at the middle uninucleate stage. The expression of SPL was repressed from the meiosis stage, but significantly repressed at the uninucleate stage. tae-miR160 and tae-miR167e were repressed at the vacuolated stage, but their putative target genes GAMYB and ARF12 were both repressed at earlier stages. The expression of tae-miR160 was a little higher under cold conditions than under control conditions from the uninucleate stage, but ARF18 was significantly repressed from the middle uninucleate stage. tae-miR2275-3p was repressed only during the vacuolated stage; its putative target genes were induced during the PMC and middle uninucleate stages but repressed under meiosis and vacuolated stages. The expression of miR159 was significantly repressed under cold conditions during the PMC and vacuolated stages, but its putative target gene MYB65 was significantly induced during the middle and vacuolated stages. The expression of novel-miR0652 and novel-miR1862 differed in the expression data, but not in qRT–PCR validation. The putative target of novel-miR1862, GAMYB-like was induced at the PMC stage, but repressed at the middle and vacuolated stages.

2.9. Identification of miRNA Target Genes via Degradome Sequencing

Target gene validation is important to further understand the biological functions of miRNAs. To identify the targets cleaved by the candidate miRNAs identified in the present study, degradome sequencing was used for the cold- and control-treated BS366 anthers. In total, 36,647,546 and 27,244,395 raw reads were obtained from DF (degradome for anthers under fertile condition) and DS (degradome for anthers under sterile condition), respectively. After removing the reads < 15 nt and adaptors, 35,971,562 and 26,622,338 unique reads from the DF and DS libraries, respectively, were mapped to the wheat genome. The cleaved targets for miRNAs were identified based on a method in the CleaveLand pipeline [29]. The sliced target transcripts were categorized into five categories (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) according to the relative abundance of the tags at the target sites. Targets in category 0 were evaluated as the most significant.
In our degradome dataset, 495 target transcripts for 572 known miRNA families were identified in the two libraries, corresponding to 1141 miRNA-target cleavage pairs. Of the 495 target transcripts, 115 (23.23%) were found in both libraries, 355 (71.72%) were found only in the DS library, and 41 (8.28%) were found only in the DF library (Supplementary Table S8). As expected, most of the transcripts targeted by the highly conserved miRNAs were associated with conserved target genes. miR160 targeted the ARF17 gene (TraesCS1A02G156600) in both DS and DF libraries. The transcript levels of ARF17 were higher in the DS than those in the DF library (Figure 12a). Tae-miR159a targeted MYB65 (TraesCS1A02G308100) in both DS and DF libraries. The reads of MYB65 were more abundant in the DF library than in the DS library (Figure 12b). miR166 targeted HB-HD-ZIP genes (TraesCS1B02G173900, TraesCS1A02G157500) in both DS and DF libraries. The reads of HD-Zip were more abundant in the DF library than in the DS library (Figure 12c).
There are genes that could only be cleaved by corresponding miRNAs in the DS library. The cleavage of ARF17 genes (TraesCS1B02G173700, TraesCS1D02G155100) was only observed in the DS library (Figure 13a,c). An NF-YA transcription factor encoding gene (TraesCS2A02G172500) was targeted by miR169a only in the DS library (Figure 13b). TaAP2-A (TraesCS2A02G514200) was targeted by miR172 only in the DS library (Figure 13d). Two TIR1 genes (TraesCS1B02G119100 and TraesCS1D02G099900) were cleaved by miR393 only under cold conditions (Figure 13e). A HD-Zip coding gene (TraesCS1D02G155200) was cleaved by miR166a under cold conditions (Figure 13f).

3. Discussion

3.1. The Potential Role of Conserved miRNAs in the Anther Development of Wheat

The fertility of TGMS lines is impaired by temperature. It has been reported that epigenetic regulation, such as DNA methylation and miRNA regulation, participates in male sterility in plant TGMS lines [8,30]. Several conserved miRNAs have been reported to be essential for reproductive development in plants, including miR156, miR159, miR160, miR164, miR165, miR167, miR169, miR319, miR2275, tae-miR160, tae-miR171, tae-miR396, and tae-miR2275 [14] (Figure 7). In this study, miR159 was found to be highly abundant and differentially expressed between cold and control conditions during stage 2.2. The miR159-GAMYB pathway is conserved in higher plants, where GAMYB expression promotes programmed cell death in seeds (aleurone) and anthers (tapetum) [31]. The closely related MYB33 and MYB65 genes of Arabidopsis have high sequence similarity to the barley (Hordeum vulgare) GAMYB gene. T-DNA insertional mutants were isolated for both genes, and an myb33myb65 double mutant was defective in anther development [32]. In Arabidopsis, miR159 is a three-member gene family whose mature products differ by a single nucleotide. The three targets of miR159-MYB33, MYB65, and MYB101 have been reported to be involved in vegetative to reproductive transition, anther development, male-specific cytokinesis, and programmed cell death (PCD) [32,33]. In this study, miR159a was predicted to negatively regulate GAMYB transcription factor (TraesCS1D02G307500), an orthologue of MYB domain protein 65 (MYB65) in Arabidopsis. The cleavage of TaMYB65 was validated in the degradome sequencing. These results suggest that miRNA159a-MYB65 may also have a function in BS366 male sterility. miR172 regulates APETALA2 (AP2) and AP2-like genes. The role of miR172 in the regulation of flowering time and floral organs has been reported in Arabidopsis [20]. The cleavage of TaAP2-1A was only found in the cold-treated degradome. This result suggested that miR172-AP2 may have a function in the male sterility of BS366.

3.2. Impaired Cell Plate Formation during Meiosis

Cellular trafficking is the foundation of cellular morphology and function. The Golgi apparatus plays an important role in the secretion and transportation of cellular vesicles during cellular trafficking [34]. During cytokinesis in plants, the physical insertion of a membranous cell plate depends on the cytokinetic apparatus of the phragmoplast [35]. It has been reported that Golgi-derived vesicles transport xyloglucans and other cell wall-containing materials to form the phragmoplast [36]. In this study, a defect in sterile BS366 was first observed during the dyad stage, with abnormal cell plate formation (Figure 2). A disrupted dynamic organization of phragmoplast microtubules and deposition of the cell plate under sterile conditions was observed in sterile BS366 at meiosis [37]. In the blue module, vesicle-mediated transport and Golgi vesicle transport were significantly repressed. The DEMs between cold and control conditions were mainly involved in Golgi vesicle transport, Golgi-associated vesicle membrane, and phragmoplast. The expression of putative vesicle-associated protein 2 was predicted to be repressed by miR6224a-3p during the 3.0 stage. Thus, miRNAs may play a critical role in the defective dyad and tetrad. Phragmoplasts in plants are composed of microtubules (MTs), microfilaments, motor proteins, and several regulators [38]. In the brown module, genes involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization were induced under cold conditions (Figure 4). One gene (ACIP1) encoding a microtubule-associated protein was one of the hub genes in this module (Figure 4). Genes involved in tubulin binding, microtubule binding, and motor activity were differentially expressed between cold and control conditions from stage 2.2 (Figure 6). A Tubulin 1 was targeted by miR5340 and miR5293 in the DS library. One beta tubulin 6 was targeted by miR1155 in the DS library (Supplementary Table S8). These results suggested that cell plate formation is disturbed by the altered Golgi vesicle transport and phragmoplast formation, and miRNA regulation may play important roles in these processes.

3.3. Suppression of Lipid Metabolism Was Responsible for Male Sterility in BS366

Fatty acids and their derivatives are essential components of anther cuticle development and pollen wall formation; lipids are mainly synthesized in the tapetum and transported to the anther wall layers and pollen to promote anther and pollen wall development [39]. The anther cuticle is an extracellular lipidic layer that covers the anther surface [40]. The cuticle is an insoluble and hydrophobic matrix (cutin), which is formed almost exclusively by the interesterification of C16- and C18-polyhydroxy fatty acids [41]. Under cold conditions, the lipid metabolism, oxidation, and transport were repressed in the blue module (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S2). Genes encoding LTPG6, lipase, and LTP2 involved in lipid transport were among the ten hub genes. Genes involved in lipid metabolism were differentially expressed between cold and control conditions as early as stage 2.2. The sporopollenin biosynthetic process and pollen exine formation were significantly represented. The cutin, suberine, and wax biosynthesis pathway was among the top 20 enriched pathways (Figure 6). The outer wall of pollen and spores, namely the exine, is composed of sporopollenin, which is highly resistant to chemical reagents and enzymes [39]. Sporopollenin, discovered in the outer exine layer of pollen walls, is a lipid- and phenolic-based polymer with high carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen cross-linking Phenylpropanoid pathway derivatives are essential components of sporopollenin in seed plants [42]. Lipid metabolism-related GMS genes involved in the biosynthesis and transport of sporopollenin and anther cutin have been discussed in maize, rice, and Arabidopsis [39]. Male GMS genes such as OsDPW, OsDPW2, OsC6, AtMs2, AtACOS5, AtCYP703A2, and Zmms44 were previously reported to be involved in the biosynthesis and transport of sporopollenin and anther cutin. In this study, wheat orthologues of OsDPW, AtMs2, AtACOS5, and AtCYP703A2 were repressed during stages 2.2 and 2.5 under cold conditions. The orthologues of Zmms44 and OsDPW2 were induced during stage 3.0 under cold conditions. The expression of a wheat orthologue of OsC6 was repressed during stages 2.5 and 3.0 under cold conditions. A wheat orthologue of AtCER3, a biosynthetic enzyme involved in the production of very long-chain alkanes, was repressed during stage 2.2, 2.5, and 3.0 [43]. It has been reported that glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) is mainly involved in anther cutin biosynthesis. Mutation of AtGPAT6 causes defective tapetum development and leads to the abortion of pollen grains and defective pollen wall formation [44]. Two wheat orthologues of AtGPAT6 were repressed under cold conditions during stage 3.0. OsABCG26 was responsible for the transport of cutin to form the anther cuticle [45]. The expression of TaABCG26, an orthologue of OsABCG26, was repressed under cold conditions. All of these results indicated that the specific repression of lipid- and fatty acid-related processes might impair the cuticle and pollen exine formation in BS366.

3.4. The Auxin Signaling Pathway Is Essential to Male Sterility in BS366

The plant hormone auxin plays a critical role in nearly all aspects of plant development including embryogenesis, organogenesis, and reproductive development [46,47]. Auxin regulates transcriptional response via its receptors, TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESISTANT 1 (TIR1) and AUXIN F-BOX (AFB) [48]. The auxin signaling module is composed of auxin response factors (ARFs), which can either activate or repress the downstream target genes through binding to auxin response elements (AuxRE; TGTCTC/GAGACA) in the promoters [49]. miR160, miR167, and miR393 are involved in auxin signaling through targeting ARFs, AFB, and TIR1, respectively [50]. Studies have shown that auxin regulates anther dehiscence, pollen maturation, and filament elongation during late anther development [51,52]. Plants expressing miR160-resistant ARF17 showed abnormal stamen structure and reduced fertility [53]. The absence of primexine in the arf17 mutant leads to pollen wall patterning defects and pollen degradation [54]. This indicates a potential role for ARF17 in plant fertility. In the degradome data, TraesCS1A02G156600 (ARF17-1A) was cleaved by miR160 under both conditions, but more cleaved reads were found under control conditions. The cleavage of TraesCS1B02G173700 (ARF17-1B) and TraesCS1D02G155100 (ARF17-1D) by miR160 was only found under cold conditions. ARFs interact with auxin/indole acetic acid repressors (Aux/IAAs), which themselves form co-receptor complexes with one of six TIR1/AFB proteins [55]. Two TIR1 genes (TraesCS1B02G119100 and TraesCS1D02G099900) were cleaved by miR393 under cold conditions. Several Auxin-responsive protein-coding genes, including IAA12, IAA14, IAA15, and IAA18, were repressed in BS366 under cold conditions. Auxin-induced protein-coding genes were repressed under cold conditions (Supplementary Table S9). Thus, the cleavage of TIR1 and AFR17 may result in male sterility in BS366 through pollenwall pattern formation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

BS366 is a temperature-sensitive genic male sterile line. It is male sterile at 12 °C (cold) and male fertile at 20 °C (control) with 12 h daylight. Seeds of BS366 were planted in plastic pots in early October. The plastic pots were embedded in the ground in early October 2021 and moved into the greenhouse after natural vernalization. Before the five-leaf stage, ten pots of BS366 plants of uniform growth were selected and then randomly assigned to the cold and control temperature groups. The cold and control treatments of BS366 were carried out according to Liu et al. [56].

4.2. Phenotypic Analysis of BS366

Ten BS366 plants were used for the pollen viability evaluation. Anthers from three middle florets of one spike were mixed into three replicates to assess the pollen viability per plant. Anthers were separately crushed and stained with 1% iodine-potassium iodide (I2-KI) solution. The fertile pollen ratio of each replicate was calculated for the cold- and control-treated BS366. BS366 plants of uniform growth were selected and then bagged at heading stage. Ten individual plants with three main spikes were chosen for phenotype evaluation. Spikelet seed-setting rate was calculated using (Number of spikelet seeds per ear/Total number of spikelets per ear) × 100% at maturity stage. For microspore phenotype observation, anthers at respective stages under both conditions were collected and fixed in FAA solution (formaldehyde:glacial acetic acid:50% ethanol = 5:5:9). To evaluate pollen viability, cold and control anthers were separately crushed, stained with 1% I2-KI solution and photographed under an Olympus BX-53 microscope (Tokyo, Japan). For microspore phenotype observation, the anthers were mashed with tweezers to release the pollen and dyed with improved carbol fuchsin solution. Photographs of microspores and pollen were obtained using an Olympus BX-53 microscope (Tokyo, Japan).

4.3. Data Acquisition

The microarray analysis was primarily based on previous Affymetrix microarray data [37]. Samples were collected from different developmental stages of the TGMS line BS366 under different treatment conditions (A, 10 °C with 12 h light/12 h dark; B, 10 °C with 14 h light/10 h dark; E, 20 °C with 12 h light/12 h dark; F, 20 °C with 14 h light/10 h dark). The small RNA and degradome data were downloaded from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accessed on 21 July 2020) with the accession numbers GSE36867 and GSE37134. The sequences of all of the transcripts used to design the probes used in the Affymetrix GeneChip Wheat Genome Arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were downloaded (https://www.thermofisher.com/, accessed on 21 July 2020) and blasted against the IWGSC reference v1.1 genome with a cut off of 1 × 10−10 to convert all of the Array IDs into gene IDs. Only Array IDs that had corresponding genes were retrieved for further analysis.

4.4. Bioinformatics Analysis

All array IDs in the Affymetrix GeneChip Wheat Genome Arrays were annotated to the IWGSC reference v1.1 genome, and the array IDs were transformed into gene IDs. For genes with more than one array ID, only the one with a higher average expression level was used for the latter analysis. Differentially expressed genes were analyzed using the limma package in R with a cut-off p value less than 0.05 and fold change greater than 2 [57]. After filtering the low-quality reads and removing the adaptor sequences in the small RNA sequencing, clean reads (sRNAs) in the range of 18–30 nt were retained for further analysis. All of the unique sequences were aligned to the IWGSC reference v1.1 genome to obtain tag expression and genomic location information using SOAP [58]. Reads that mapped to wheat rRNA, tRNA, scRNA, snRNA, or snoRNA were removed based on blasting against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 12 August 2020) and Rfam RNA family databases with default settings. The remaining tags were blasted against the wheat database and then the other plant databases in miRBase release 20 (http://mirbase.org/ accessed on 13 August 2020), using the BLAST search to identify the known miRNAs [59]. Reads that did not annotate to any category were used to predict novel miRNAs using the miRNA prediction program MIREAP (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/, accessed on 15 August 2020). The clean reads for each miRNA were normalized using the following formula: normalized expression (TPM) = mapped read count/total reads × 1000,000. The differentially expressed miRNAs were identified using DEGseq with a threshold of fold change higher than 2 and a p value lower than 0.05 [60]. The miRNA targets were predicted using psRobot and TargetFinder software. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was carried out for DEGS in the array data and the target genes of the miRNAs using TBtools [61].
Raw reads of degradome sequencing data were preprocessed to remove adapters and low-quality tags. Clean tags were aligned to the GenBank and Rfam 11.0 databases to annotate the rRNA, tRNA, scRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA, and were mapped to the wheat genome to obtain cDNA sense and antisense tags. The tags mapped to cDNA or mRNA sequences were used to predict the cleavage sites. PAREsnip (http://srna-workbench.cmp.uea.ac.uk/tools/paresnip/, accessed on 28 August 2020) and CleaveLand 3.0 (http://sites.psu.edu/axtell/, accessed on 28 August 2020) were used to identify potentially cleaved targets. All targets were classified into five categories (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) according to a previous study [62]. Based on the expression characteristics of the wheat transcriptome data, t-plots were built for the high-efficiency analysis of the potential miRNA targets.

4.5. Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis

Gene co-expression networks were constructed using the Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) package in R software. The soft-thresholding power β was calculated in the construction of each module using the pickSoftThreshold function of the WGCNA. This method provides a suitable power value for network construction by calculating the scale-free topology fit index for a set of candidate powers, ranging from 1 to 30. In this way, the appropriate power was determined when the index value for the reference dataset exceeded 0.85. Once the soft-thresholding power value was set, the WGCNA algorithms were used to construct the co-expression modules in R software. A one-step network construction method was used to identify the co-expression modules using the blockwiseModules function. The minimum number of genes for each module was set at 40. Network visualization for genes in each module and network between miRNAs and their targets were performed using Cytoscape software version 3.7 [63] with a cut-off of the weight parameter at 0.3.

4.6. Sample Preparation, RNA Isolation, and Real-Time qRT–PCR

Anthers of BS366 under different conditions were sampled from three main spikes of fifteen individual plants at the pollen mother cell (PMC) stage, meiosis stage, early uninucleate stage, middle uninucleate stage, and vacuolated stage. All samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA, USA). The concentration and quality were determined with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. For real-time qRT–PCR, cDNA was synthesized according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser, Takara; miRcute Plus miRNA qPCR Kit, TIGEN). Differentially expressed genes and miRNAs were validated with a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) using SYBR Green II (Takara). Expression levels of the mRNAs in the samples were normalized against the endogenous wheat actin gene with primer sequences 5′-TACTCCCTCACAACAACCG-3′ and 5′-AGAACCTCCACTGAGAACAA-3′. The expression levels of the miRNAs were normalized using miR-U6 with the primer sequence 5′-GCCTGACACGCACAAATCGAGAAAT-3′. The relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. All the expression analyses were carried out with three technique and biological replicates. Primer sequences were designed using Primer3 input version 4.0.0 (http://primer3.ut.ee/, accessed on 12 June 2021) and primer premier5. The primers for expression validation are listed in Supplementary Table S10.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the differential regulation of Golgi vesicle transport and phragmoplast formation processes were responsible for defective cell plate formation in the dyads and tetrads during meiosis. DEGs involved in lipid metabolism, the sporopollenin biosynthetic process, and pollen exine formation may be essential to shrinking microspores at the vacuolated stage. The specific cleavage of ARF17 and TIR1 by miR160 and miR393 repressed the auxin signaling pathway during pollen wall pattern formation under cold conditions. The results of our work on these differentially expressed miRNAs and their targets in anthers provide a new understanding of TGMS wheat, which will help us better understand the potential regulatory mechanisms of male sterility in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23158057/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.L. (Yongjie Liu) and S.Z. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. D.L., Y.L. (Yanhong Li), J.C. and J.G. (Jie Gong) conducted the expression experiment. L.Z. provided the microarray data. S.G., C.Z. and X.L. designed the experiment and revised the manuscript. F.Z., Z.C., Y.W. and J.M. provided the plant materials. B.P., X.C. and J.G. (Jiangang Gao) provided the raw expression data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Foundation for Youths of BAAFS, grant number QNJJ202008; the Important Genetically Modified Crops New Germplasm Creation, grant number KJCX20200205; and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Crop Phenomics (KJCX201917).

Data Availability Statement

The microarray data used for this study are deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accessed on 1 June 2022) under accession number GSE200128. The small RNA and degradome data were downloaded from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, accessed on 21 July 2020) with the accession numbers GSE36867 and GSE37134.

Acknowledgments

We thank Liping Zhang (Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences) for providing us the genome microarray data for BS366.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Longin, C.F.; Muhleisen, J.; Maurer, H.P.; Zhang, H.; Gowda, M.; Reif, J.C. Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, Y.J.; Zhang, D. Molecular Control of Male Fertility for Crop Hybrid Breeding. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, S.; Heng, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhou, K.; Pei, J.; He, H.; Deng, X.W.; et al. Poaceae-specific MS1 encodes a phospholipid-binding protein for male fertility in bread wheat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 12614–12619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Tucker, E.J.; Baumann, U.; Kouidri, A.; Suchecki, R.; Baes, M.; Garcia, M.; Okada, T.; Dong, C.; Wu, Y.; Sandhu, A.; et al. Molecular identification of the wheat male fertility gene Ms1 and its prospects for hybrid breeding. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xia, C.; Zhang, L.C.; Zou, C.; Gu, Y.Q.; Duan, J.L.; Zhao, G.Y.; Wu, J.J.; Liu, Y.; Fang, X.H.; Gao, L.F.; et al. A TRIM insertion in the promoter of Ms2 causes male sterility in wheat. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ni, F.; Qi, J.; Hao, Q.; Lyu, B.; Luo, M.C.; Wang, Y.; Chen, F.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C.; Epstein, L.; et al. Wheat Ms2 encodes for an orphan protein that confers male sterility in grass species. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 2004, 116, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Li, H.; Guo, J.; Zhang, C.; Zheng, W.; Song, Y.; Wang, Y. Identification of Differentially Expressed miRNAs between a Wheat K-type Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Line and Its Near-Isogenic Restorer Line. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 1604–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, L.; Heikkinen, L.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Sun, H.; Wong, G. Trends in the development of miRNA bioinformatics tools. Brief Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1836–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ferreira e Silva, G.F.; Silva, E.M.; Azevedo Mda, S.; Guivin, M.A.; Ramiro, D.A.; Figueiredo, C.R.; Carrer, H.; Peres, L.E.; Nogueira, F.T. microRNA156-targeted SPL/SBP box transcription factors regulate tomato ovary and fruit development. Plant J. 2014, 78, 604–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fan, Y.; Yang, J.; Mathioni, S.M.; Yu, J.; Shen, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, Z.; Xu, C.; et al. PMS1T, producing phased small-interfering RNAs, regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 15144–15149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Tang, Z.H.; Zhang, L.P.; Xu, C.G.; Yuan, S.H.; Zhang, F.T.; Zheng, Y.L.; Zhao, C.P. Uncovering Small RNA-Mediated Responses to Cold Stress in a Wheat Thermosensitive Genic Male-Sterile Line by Deep Sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 721–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Ding, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, N.; Xu, J.; Hu, Q.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xie, S.; Zhu, L.; Min, L.; et al. microRNAs involved in auxin signalling modulate male sterility under high-temperature stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant J. 2017, 91, 977–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Luo, Y.; Guo, Z.; Li, L. Evolutionary conservation of microRNA regulatory programs in plant flower development. Dev. Biol. 2013, 380, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ding, X.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, L.; Zhao, T.; Yang, S. Heat-Responsive miRNAs Participate in the Regulation of Male Fertility Stability in Soybean CMS-Based F(1) under High Temperature Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Alonso-Peral, M.M.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Allen, R.S.; Schnippenkoetter, W.; Ohms, S.; White, R.G.; Millar, A.A. The microRNA159-regulated GAMYB-like genes inhibit growth and promote programmed cell death in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 757–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, Z.; An, X.; Zhu, T.; Yan, T.; Wu, S.; Tian, Y.; Li, J.; Wan, X. Discovering and Constructing ceRNA-miRNA-Target Gene Regulatory Networks during Anther Development in Maize. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yu, J.; Meng, Z.; Liang, W.; Behera, S.; Kudla, J.; Tucker, M.R.; Luo, Z.; Chen, M.; Xu, D.; Zhao, G.; et al. A Rice Ca2+ Binding Protein Is Required for Tapetum Function and Pollen Formation. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1772–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wu, M.F.; Tian, Q.; Reed, J.W. Arabidopsis microRNA167 controls patterns of ARF6 and ARF8 expression, and regulates both female and male reproduction. Development 2006, 133, 4211–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Aukerman, M.J.; Sakai, H. Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a MicroRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2730–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, X. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 2004, 303, 2022–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ma, Z.; Hu, X.; Cai, W.; Huang, W.; Zhou, X.; Luo, Q.; Yang, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, J. Arabidopsis miR171-targeted scarecrow-like proteins bind to GT cis-elements and mediate gibberellin-regulated chlorophyll biosynthesis under light conditions. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hewezi, T.; Baum, T.J. Complex feedback regulations govern the expression of miRNA396 and its GRF target genes. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 749–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sun, L.; Sun, G.; Shi, C.; Sun, D. Transcriptome analysis reveals new microRNAs-mediated pathway involved in anther development in male sterile wheat. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wan, X.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; Dong, Z.; An, X.; Ma, B.; Tian, Y.; Li, J. Maize Genic Male-Sterility Genes and Their Applications in Hybrid Breeding: Progress and Perspectives. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 321–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dong, X.; Hong, Z.; Sivaramakrishnan, M.; Mahfouz, M.; Verma, D.P. Callose synthase (CalS5) is required for exine formation during microgametogenesis and for pollen viability in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 42, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Suzuki, T.; Narciso, J.O.; Zeng, W.; van de Meene, A.; Yasutomi, M.; Takemura, S.; Lampugnani, E.R.; Doblin, M.S.; Bacic, A.; Ishiguro, S. KNS4/UPEX1: A Type II Arabinogalactan β-(1,3)-Galactosyltransferase Required for Pollen Exine Development. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 183–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sun, M.X.; Huang, X.Y.; Yang, J.; Guan, Y.F.; Yang, Z.N. Arabidopsis RPG1 is important for primexine deposition and functions redundantly with RPG2 for plant fertility at the late reproductive stage. Plant Reprod. 2013, 26, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Addo-Quaye, C.; Miller, W.; Axtell, M.J. CleaveLand: A pipeline for using degradome data to find cleaved small RNA targets. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 130–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ma, Y.Z.; Min, L.; Wang, M.J.; Wang, C.Z.; Zhao, Y.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Fang, Q.D.; Wu, Y.L.; Xie, S.; Ding, Y.H.; et al. Disrupted Genome Methylation in Response to High Temperature Has Distinct Affects on Microspore Abortion and Anther Indehiscence. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 1387–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, Y.; Alonso-Peral, M.; Wong, G.; Wang, M.B.; Millar, A.A. Ubiquitous miR159 repression of MYB33/65 in Arabidopsis rosettes is robust and is not perturbed by a wide range of stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Millar, A.A.; Gubler, F. The Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes, MYB33 and MYB65, are microRNA-regulated genes that redundantly facilitate anther development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Allen, R.S.; Li, J.; Stahle, M.I.; Dubroué, A.; Gubler, F.; Millar, A.A. Genetic analysis reveals functional redundancy and the major target genes of the Arabidopsis miR159 family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 16371–16376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Hirokawa, N. Kinesin and dynein superfamily proteins and the mechanism of organelle transport. Science 1998, 279, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lee, Y.R.; Giang, H.M.; Liu, B. A novel plant kinesin-related protein specifically associates with the phragmoplast organelles. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2427–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Jürgens, G. Cytokinesis in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yang, D.; Zhao, C.; Zheng, Y. Cold stress contributes to aberrant cytokinesis during male meiosis I in a wheat thermosensitive genic male sterile line. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lee, Y.R.; Liu, B. The rise and fall of the phragmoplast microtubule array. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wan, X.; Wu, S.; Li, Z.; An, X.; Tian, Y. Lipid Metabolism: Critical Roles in Male Fertility and Other Aspects of Reproductive Development in Plants. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 955–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kunst, L.; Samuels, L. Plant cuticles shine: Advances in wax biosynthesis and export. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Domínguez, E.; Heredia-Guerrero, J.A.; Heredia, A. Plant cutin genesis: Unanswered questions. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yaacob, S.; Jamil, R.Z.R.; Suah, F.B.M. Sporopollenin based materials as a versatile choice for the detoxification of environmental pollutants-A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 207, 990–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kim, H.; Yu, S.I.; Jung, S.H.; Lee, B.H.; Suh, M.C. The F-Box Protein SAGL1 and ECERIFERUM3 Regulate Cuticular Wax Biosynthesis in Response to Changes in Humidity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 2223–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bu, R.F.; Wang, R.H.; Wei, Q.C.; Hu, H.Y.; Sun, H.L.; Song, P.W.; Yu, Y.G.; Liu, Q.L.; Zheng, Z.C.; Li, T.; et al. Silencing of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase 6 (GPAT6) gene using a newly established virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) system in cucumber alleviates autotoxicity mimicked by cinnamic acid (CA). Plant Soil 2019, 438, 329–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Yan, W.; Xie, G.; Lu, J.; Wang, N.; Lu, Q.; Yao, N.; Yang, G.; Xia, J.; et al. An ABC transporter, OsABCG26, is required for anther cuticle and pollen exine formation and pollen-pistil interactions in rice. Plant Sci. 2016, 253, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Vanneste, S.; Friml, J. Auxin: A trigger for change in plant development. Cell 2009, 136, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sundberg, E.; Østergaard, L. Distinct and dynamic auxin activities during reproductive development. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a001628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Uchida, N.; Takahashi, K.; Iwasaki, R.; Yamada, R.; Yoshimura, M.; Endo, T.A.; Kimura, S.; Zhang, H.; Nomoto, M.; Tada, Y.; et al. Chemical hijacking of auxin signaling with an engineered auxin-TIR1 pair. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Okushima, Y.; Overvoorde, P.J.; Arima, K.; Alonso, J.M.; Chan, A.; Chang, C.; Ecker, J.R.; Hughes, B.; Lui, A.; Nguyen, D.; et al. Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana: Unique and overlapping functions of ARF7 and ARF19. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 444–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sun, G. MicroRNAs and their diverse functions in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 80, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cecchetti, V.; Altamura, M.M.; Falasca, G.; Costantino, P.; Cardarelli, M. Auxin regulates Arabidopsis anther dehiscence, pollen maturation, and filament elongation. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1760–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Xu, X.F.; Wang, B.; Feng, Y.F.; Xue, J.S.; Qian, X.X.; Liu, S.Q.; Zhou, J.; Yu, Y.H.; Yang, N.Y.; Xu, P.; et al. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 Directly Regulates MYB108 for Anther Dehiscence. Plant Physiol. 2019, 181, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mallory, A.C.; Bartel, D.P.; Bartel, B. MicroRNA-directed regulation of Arabidopsis AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for proper development and modulates expression of early auxin response genes. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1360–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yang, J.; Tian, L.; Sun, M.X.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhu, J.; Guan, Y.F.; Jia, Q.S.; Yang, Z.N. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR17 is essential for pollen wall pattern formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 720–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lakehal, A.; Chaabouni, S.; Cavel, E.; Le Hir, R.; Ranjan, A.; Raneshan, Z.; Novák, O.; Păcurar, D.I.; Perrone, I.; Jobert, F.; et al. A Molecular Framework for the Control of Adventitious Rooting by TIR1/AFB2-Aux/IAA-Dependent Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1499–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Y.J.; Li, D.; Gong, J.; Wang, Y.B.; Chen, Z.B.; Pang, B.S.; Chen, X.C.; Gao, J.G.; Yang, W.B.; Zhang, F.T.; et al. Comparative transcriptome and DNA methylation analysis in temperature-sensitive genic male sterile wheat BS366. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, R.; Li, Y.; Kristiansen, K.; Wang, J. SOAP: Short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kozomara, A.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: Integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D152–D157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Wang, L.K.; Feng, Z.X.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.W.; Zhang, X.G. DEGseq: An R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ji, Y.; Chen, P.; Chen, J.; Pennerman, K.K.; Liang, X.; Yan, H.; Zhou, S.; Feng, G.; Wang, C.; Yin, G.; et al. Combinations of Small RNA, RNA, and Degradome Sequencing Uncovers the Expression Pattern of microRNA−mRNA Pairs Adapting to Drought Stress in Leaf and Root of Dactylis glomerata L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 08057 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of BS366 under cold and control conditions. Images of control- (a) and cold-treated (b) BS366 spikes at anthesis; the pollen fertility (c) and seed setting (d) of BS366 under cold and control conditions.
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of BS366 under cold and control conditions. Images of control- (a) and cold-treated (b) BS366 spikes at anthesis; the pollen fertility (c) and seed setting (d) of BS366 under cold and control conditions.
Ijms 23 08057 g001
Ijms 23 08057 g002 550
Figure 2. The microspores of BS366 under cold and control conditions. Microspores under control (a–d,i–l) and cold (e–h,m–p) conditions. Meiotic interphase (a,e), meiotic dyad (b,f), meiotic tetrad (c,g), early uninucleate stage (d,h), vacuolated stage (i,m), binucleate stage (j,n), and mature pollen stage (k,o). Pollen grains of BS366 under control (l) and cold (p) conditions stained with I2-KI. Bars in (a–k,m–o) 20 μm; bars in (c,d) 100 μm.
Figure 2. The microspores of BS366 under cold and control conditions. Microspores under control (a–d,i–l) and cold (e–h,m–p) conditions. Meiotic interphase (a,e), meiotic dyad (b,f), meiotic tetrad (c,g), early uninucleate stage (d,h), vacuolated stage (i,m), binucleate stage (j,n), and mature pollen stage (k,o). Pollen grains of BS366 under control (l) and cold (p) conditions stained with I2-KI. Bars in (a–k,m–o) 20 μm; bars in (c,d) 100 μm.
Ijms 23 08057 g002
Ijms 23 08057 g003 550
Figure 3. Clustering dendrograms and expression heatmap of all the expressed probes obtained via hierarchical clustering of topological overlapping dissimilarity. A total of 18 co-expression modules were constructed and are shown in different colors. Blue and red in the heatmap indicate low and high expression, respectively.
Figure 3. Clustering dendrograms and expression heatmap of all the expressed probes obtained via hierarchical clustering of topological overlapping dissimilarity. A total of 18 co-expression modules were constructed and are shown in different colors. Blue and red in the heatmap indicate low and high expression, respectively.
Ijms 23 08057 g003
Ijms 23 08057 g004 550
Figure 4. Expression and gene ontology (GO) analysis of genes in the blue and brown modules. Gene expression pattern in the blue (a) and brown (b) modules: In the heatmap, red indicates upregulated genes, black indicates neutral genes, and green indicates downregulated genes. The bar plots show the eigengene values. The GO analysis of genes in the blue (c) and brown (d) modules: All of the biological processes were fused using ClueGO, and processes with similar functions were clustered into 25 (c) and 20 (d) clusters. The names of the significantly represented clusters are shown in larger and colored fonts. Cycles with different colors indicate that the GO term can be associated with different groups. The other GO terms are shown in smaller and gray font. Gene co-expression network of genes in the blue (e) and brown (f) modules: The top 200 connections are shown for each module. Genes with the top 10 connections are shown in larger sizes and are colored red to yellow. Red and yellow indicate higher and lower numbers of interactions between the genes, respectively, and orange indicates the median number of interactions of genes.
Figure 4. Expression and gene ontology (GO) analysis of genes in the blue and brown modules. Gene expression pattern in the blue (a) and brown (b) modules: In the heatmap, red indicates upregulated genes, black indicates neutral genes, and green indicates downregulated genes. The bar plots show the eigengene values. The GO analysis of genes in the blue (c) and brown (d) modules: All of the biological processes were fused using ClueGO, and processes with similar functions were clustered into 25 (c) and 20 (d) clusters. The names of the significantly represented clusters are shown in larger and colored fonts. Cycles with different colors indicate that the GO term can be associated with different groups. The other GO terms are shown in smaller and gray font. Gene co-expression network of genes in the blue (e) and brown (f) modules: The top 200 connections are shown for each module. Genes with the top 10 connections are shown in larger sizes and are colored red to yellow. Red and yellow indicate higher and lower numbers of interactions between the genes, respectively, and orange indicates the median number of interactions of genes.
Ijms 23 08057 g004
Ijms 23 08057 g005 550
Figure 5. Differentially expressed genes between cold and control conditions. (a) Venn diagram of all the differentially expressed genes at five stages. (b) Number of differentially expressed genes that were up- or downregulated at each stage. Up means upegulated under cold conditions compared to the control conditions at respective stages. (c) Hierarchical cluster analysis of all differentially expressed genes.
Figure 5. Differentially expressed genes between cold and control conditions. (a) Venn diagram of all the differentially expressed genes at five stages. (b) Number of differentially expressed genes that were up- or downregulated at each stage. Up means upegulated under cold conditions compared to the control conditions at respective stages. (c) Hierarchical cluster analysis of all differentially expressed genes.
Ijms 23 08057 g005
Ijms 23 08057 g006 550
Figure 6. Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes between cold and control conditions. GO and KEGG analysis of DEGs between cold and control conditions at stages 2.2 (a), 2.5 (b), and 3.0 (c). Left, GO enrichment analysis; right, KEGG analysis.
Figure 6. Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes between cold and control conditions. GO and KEGG analysis of DEGs between cold and control conditions at stages 2.2 (a), 2.5 (b), and 3.0 (c). Left, GO enrichment analysis; right, KEGG analysis.
Ijms 23 08057 g006
Ijms 23 08057 g007 550
Figure 7. The expression and validation of genic male sterility genes. (a) Heatmap of the differentially expressed male sterility genes during three developmental stages. (b) qRT–PCR analysis of the selected male sterility genes. Asterisks indicate significant differences between cold and control conditions (Student’s t-test, * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01). PMC, pollen mother cell stage; ME, meiosis stage; UN, uninucleate stage; VA, vacuolated stage.
Figure 7. The expression and validation of genic male sterility genes. (a) Heatmap of the differentially expressed male sterility genes during three developmental stages. (b) qRT–PCR analysis of the selected male sterility genes. Asterisks indicate significant differences between cold and control conditions (Student’s t-test, * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01). PMC, pollen mother cell stage; ME, meiosis stage; UN, uninucleate stage; VA, vacuolated stage.
Ijms 23 08057 g007
Ijms 23 08057 g008 550
Figure 8. Differentially expressed miRNAs between cold and control conditions at the respective stages. (a) Venn diagram of the differentially expressed miRNAs at stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0 (left); Venn diagram of the differentially expressed miRNAs in cold and control conditions, and the DEMs between the cold and control conditions. (b) The up- and downregulation of DEMs between cold and control conditions. (c) Expression heatmap for all DEMs in/between cold and control conditions. (d) Heatmap of the conserved known DEMs mentioned. (e) GO analysis of the predicted targets for the DEMs between cold and control conditions. A and E in (a) represent cold and control; C, F, and P in (e) indicate cellular component, molecular function, and biological process, respectively.
Figure 8. Differentially expressed miRNAs between cold and control conditions at the respective stages. (a) Venn diagram of the differentially expressed miRNAs at stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0 (left); Venn diagram of the differentially expressed miRNAs in cold and control conditions, and the DEMs between the cold and control conditions. (b) The up- and downregulation of DEMs between cold and control conditions. (c) Expression heatmap for all DEMs in/between cold and control conditions. (d) Heatmap of the conserved known DEMs mentioned. (e) GO analysis of the predicted targets for the DEMs between cold and control conditions. A and E in (a) represent cold and control; C, F, and P in (e) indicate cellular component, molecular function, and biological process, respectively.
Ijms 23 08057 g008
Ijms 23 08057 g009 550
Figure 9. The predicted opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs and functional analysis. (a) Differentially expressed miRNA–target pairs identified in the array and miRNA sequencing data. (b) Heatmap of the differentially expressed miRNA–target pairs with opposite expression patterns. miRNAs and genes with opposite expression patterns were framed using the same color in the heatmap for miRNAs and genes. The purple, red, and black frames represent opposite miRNAs and target genes at stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively. (c) Venn diagram of the predicted opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs at three developmental stages. (d) GO analysis of the target genes from the opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs.
Figure 9. The predicted opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs and functional analysis. (a) Differentially expressed miRNA–target pairs identified in the array and miRNA sequencing data. (b) Heatmap of the differentially expressed miRNA–target pairs with opposite expression patterns. miRNAs and genes with opposite expression patterns were framed using the same color in the heatmap for miRNAs and genes. The purple, red, and black frames represent opposite miRNAs and target genes at stages 1.5, 2.2, and 3.0, respectively. (c) Venn diagram of the predicted opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs at three developmental stages. (d) GO analysis of the target genes from the opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs.
Ijms 23 08057 g009
Ijms 23 08057 g010 550
Figure 10. The predicted opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs for known DEMs between the cold and control conditions. Red V-shape represents miRNAs; green circle represents genes; purple triangle represents transcription factors.
Figure 10. The predicted opposite miRNA–mRNA pairs for known DEMs between the cold and control conditions. Red V-shape represents miRNAs; green circle represents genes; purple triangle represents transcription factors.
Ijms 23 08057 g010
Ijms 23 08057 g011 550
Figure 11. Expression of conserved miRNAs and target genes at different developmental stages between cold and control conditions. F indicates control conditions, S indicates cold conditions. Asterisks indicate significant differences between cold and control conditions (Student’s t-test, * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01). PMC, pollen mother cell stage; ME, meiosis stage; UN, uninucleate stage; MUN, middle uninucleate stage; VA, vacuolated stage.
Figure 11. Expression of conserved miRNAs and target genes at different developmental stages between cold and control conditions. F indicates control conditions, S indicates cold conditions. Asterisks indicate significant differences between cold and control conditions (Student’s t-test, * p-value < 0.05, ** p-value < 0.01). PMC, pollen mother cell stage; ME, meiosis stage; UN, uninucleate stage; MUN, middle uninucleate stage; VA, vacuolated stage.
Ijms 23 08057 g011
Ijms 23 08057 g012 550
Figure 12. T-plots of representative miRNA targets under cold and control conditions. (a) The T-plots of ARF17 targeted by miR160. (b) The T-plots of MYB65 targeted by tae-159a. (c) The T-plots of HB-HD-ZIP targeted by miR166a. Upper panel, cold conditions; lower panel, control conditions. The red line represents the sliced target transcripts and is indicated by an arrow. The alignments show the miRNA with a portion of its target sequence (middle panel).
Figure 12. T-plots of representative miRNA targets under cold and control conditions. (a) The T-plots of ARF17 targeted by miR160. (b) The T-plots of MYB65 targeted by tae-159a. (c) The T-plots of HB-HD-ZIP targeted by miR166a. Upper panel, cold conditions; lower panel, control conditions. The red line represents the sliced target transcripts and is indicated by an arrow. The alignments show the miRNA with a portion of its target sequence (middle panel).
Ijms 23 08057 g012
Ijms 23 08057 g013 550
Figure 13. T-plots of representative miRNA targets under cold conditions. (a) The T-plots of ARF17 targeted by miR160a. (b) The T-plots of NF-YA targeted by miR169a. (c) The T-plots of ARF17 targeted by miR160a. (d) The T-plots of TaAP2-A targeted by miR172. (e) The T-plots of TIR1 targeted by miR393. (f) The T-plots of HD-ZIP targeted by miR66a. The red line represents the sliced target transcripts and is indicated by an arrow. The alignments show the miRNA with a portion of its target sequence.
Figure 13. T-plots of representative miRNA targets under cold conditions. (a) The T-plots of ARF17 targeted by miR160a. (b) The T-plots of NF-YA targeted by miR169a. (c) The T-plots of ARF17 targeted by miR160a. (d) The T-plots of TaAP2-A targeted by miR172. (e) The T-plots of TIR1 targeted by miR393. (f) The T-plots of HD-ZIP targeted by miR66a. The red line represents the sliced target transcripts and is indicated by an arrow. The alignments show the miRNA with a portion of its target sequence.
Ijms 23 08057 g013
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Gong, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, F.; Liao, X.; Chen, Z.; et al. Integrated Analysis of Microarray, Small RNA, and Degradome Datasets Uncovers the Role of MicroRNAs in Temperature-Sensitive Genic Male Sterility in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158057

AMA Style

Liu Y, Li D, Zhang S, Zhang L, Gong J, Li Y, Chen J, Zhang F, Liao X, Chen Z, et al. Integrated Analysis of Microarray, Small RNA, and Degradome Datasets Uncovers the Role of MicroRNAs in Temperature-Sensitive Genic Male Sterility in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(15):8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yongjie, Dan Li, Shengquan Zhang, Liping Zhang, Jie Gong, Yanhong Li, Jiamin Chen, Fengting Zhang, Xiangzheng Liao, Zhaobo Chen, and et al. 2022. "Integrated Analysis of Microarray, Small RNA, and Degradome Datasets Uncovers the Role of MicroRNAs in Temperature-Sensitive Genic Male Sterility in Wheat" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 15: 8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop