Next Article in Journal
Molecular Mechanisms Underlying TDP-43 Pathology in Cellular and Animal Models of ALS and FTLD
Next Article in Special Issue
Synergistic Effect of Methyl Jasmonate and Abscisic Acid Co-Treatment on Avenanthramide Production in Germinating Oats
Previous Article in Journal
Suppression of PGC-1α Drives Metabolic Dysfunction in TGFβ2-Induced EMT of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Biochemistry of Phytocannabinoids and Metabolic Engineering of Their Production in Heterologous Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms22094702
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Light and Dark on the Phenolic Compound Accumulation in Tartary Buckwheat Hairy Roots Overexpressing ZmLC

by
Chang Ha Park
1,
Ye Eun Park
1,
Hyeon Ji Yeo
1,
Nam Il Park
2 and
Sang Un Park
1,3,*
1
Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Korea
2
Department of Plant Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 7 Jukheon-Gil, Gangneung 25457, Korea
3
Department of Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4702; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094702
Submission received: 2 April 2021 / Revised: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 27 April 2021 / Published: 29 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Plant Secondary Metabolism 2021)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fagopyrum tataricum ‘Hokkai T10′ is a buckwheat cultivar capable of producing large amounts of phenolic compounds, including flavonoids (anthocyanins), phenolic acids, and catechin, which have antioxidant, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory properties. In the present study, we revealed that the maize transcription factor Lc increased the accumulation of phenolic compounds, including sinapic acid, 4-hydroxybenzonate, t-cinnamic acid, and rutin, in Hokkai T10 hairy roots cultured under long-photoperiod (16 h light and 8 h dark) conditions. The transcription factor upregulated phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis pathway genes, yielding total phenolic contents reaching 27.0 ± 3.30 mg g−1 dry weight, 163% greater than the total flavonoid content produced by a GUS-overexpressing line (control). In contrast, when cultured under continuous darkness, the phenolic accumulation was not significantly different between the ZmLC-overexpressing hairy roots and the control. These findings suggest that the transcription factor (ZmLC) activity may be light-responsive in the ZmLC-overexpressing hairy roots of F. tataricum, triggering activation of the phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis pathways. Further studies are required on the optimization of light intensity in ZmLC-overexpressing hairy roots of F. tataricum to enhance the production of phenolic compounds.

1. Introduction

Fagopyrum tataricum (Tartary buckwheat) is a common specialty crop with a bitter flavor that has been actively consumed for its various bioactive compounds, such as vitamins, flavonoids, amino acids, and proteins [1]. Additionally, the intake of Tartary buckwheat is considered beneficial as previous studies have identified a variety of strong biological and pharmacological properties, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, diabetic control, and carcinogenesis and tumor inhibition [2,3,4].
Agrobacterium rhizogenes is considered a natural plant genetic engineer that can induce transgenic hairy roots, in the form of adventitious roots, by transferring the T-DNA region on the root-inducing (Ri) plasmid to the host plant genome [5]. The hairy roots from mother plants have been shown to sustain vigorous growth without exogenous phytohormone application compared with their non-transgenic counterparts [6]. They also have the ability to produce the secondary metabolites present in the mother plant [7], often in greater quantity than in the parent [7]. Furthermore, A. rhizogenes-mediated hairy roots have been utilized for transgenic plant development, the increase in phytochemical production, and the investigation of metabolic processes [8].
Leaf Color (LC) is a regulatory protein in Zea mays involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis [9]. Ectopic expression of this transcription factor in various plant species results in anthocyanin accumulation and the related purple color in transgenic plants, as well as an increase in the contents of other phenolic compounds, including phenolic acids and flavonoids. For example, exogenous expression of ZmLC enhanced phenolic compounds by regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in the flowers of tobacco [10] and the leaves of apples [11]. Additionally, Park et al. reported that ZmLC overexpression in Scutellaria baicalensis hairy roots increased in baicalin, baicalein, and wogonin (a flavone group), with activation of the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway [12]. However, in several species, ZmLC did not have a strong effect [13,14], whereas co-expression with Pl (purple leaf) ultimately enhanced anthocyanin accumulation; ZmLC expression returned no visible effect in creeping bentgrass [15]. Interestingly, anthocyanin accumulation was reported to be light-dependent in ZmLC-transgenic maize seeds [16], as well as in petunia [17], alfalfa [18], and cotton leaves [19].
Previous studies have reported that Tartary buckwheat hairy roots are viable for phenolic compound production because of the high concentration in these phenolics [20,21]. However, there is little research on the effect of ZmLC overexpression on flavonoid biosynthesis in the hairy roots of this species. In this study, we induced ZmLC-transgenic hairy roots from Tartary buckwheat to enhance the accumulation of phenolics and investigated the effect of hairy root culture under both long photoperiod (16 h light and 8 h dark) conditions and continuous darkness on phenolic compound accumulation (Figure 1).

2. Results

2.1. Hairy Root Induction

qRT-PCR was performed to measure ZmLC expression in the GUS- and three -transgenic hairy root lines. ZmLC-transgenic hairy root lines showed higher ZmLC expression than in the GUS line, verifying the production of one and three independent transgenic Tartary buckwheat hairy root lines overexpressing GUS and ZmLC, respectively (Figure 2).

2.2. Effect of Dark Treatment on the Production of Phenolic Compounds in ZmLC- and GUS-Transgenic Hairy Root Lines of Tartary Buckwheat

Three ZmLC- and one GUS-transgenic hairy root line (control) of Tartary buckwheat with fresh weights that were not significantly different were cultured in continuous darkness at 25 °C for two weeks (Table 1). The expression of 12 phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthetic genes (FtPAL, FtC4H, Ft4CL, FtCHS, FtCHI, FtF3H, FtF3′H1, FtFLS2, FtDFR, FtLAR, FtANS, and FtANR) was assessed in the four lines, revealing that FtCHI, FtF3H, and FtANS expression was slightly higher in controls, but the expression of most genes was not significantly different (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 4, nine phenolic compounds (4-hydroxybenzonate, chlorogenic acid, t-cinnamic acid, sinapic acid, catechin, (−)-epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, rutin, and quercetin) were detected in three ZmLC- and one GUS-transgenic hairy root lines of Tartary buckwheat. The level of epicatechin gallate was slightly higher in the GUS-transgenic hairy root line than in the three ZmLC-transgenic lines; in addition, the total content (sum of the nine phenolics) was not significantly different among the transgenic hairy root lines. The phenolic contents of the transgenic hairy roots cultured in continuous darkness were consistent with the results of gene expression analysis.

2.3. Effect of Light Treatment on the Production of Phenolic Compound in ZmLC- and GUS-Transgenic Hairy Root Lines of Tartary Buckwheat

Three ZmLC- and one GUS-transgenic hairy root line (control) of Tartary buckwheat were cultured at 25 °C under a long photoperiod (16 h light and 8 h dark) for two weeks. The fresh weights of the transgenic lines were not significantly different (Table 2). According to the gene expression profiles, the majority of genes were likely to be more highly expressed in the ZmLC-transgenic hairy roots than in controls. The expression of Ft4CL, FtF3H, FtFLS2, FtDFR, FtANS, and FtANR was higher in the ZmLC-transgenic hairy roots in particular (Figure 5). The HPLC analysis showed an increase in phenolic compounds in ZmLC-transgenic hairy root lines in comparison with controls, which was consistent with the profiles in Figure 6. In particular, the total content (sum of nine phenolics) was 1.32-, 1.60-, and 1.61-fold higher in the three ZmLC-transgenic hairy root lines than the controls, and greater concentrations of 4-hydroxybenzonate, t-cinnamic acid, sinapic acid, and rutin were also shown in these lines.

3. Discussion

In this study, the transgenic hairy root lines of Tartary buckwheat were analyzed for phenolic compounds, including 4-hydroxybenzonate, chlorogenic acid, t-cinnamic acid, sinapic acid, catechin, (−)-epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, rutin, and quercetin. Previous data have revealed that the hairy roots of Tartary buckwheat can be a rich source of many phenolics, such as rutin, quercetin, (−)-epicatechin, catechin, and chlorogenic acid, which were identified in the hairy and seedling roots of Tartary buckwheat by Kim et al. [22]. Similarly, Thew et al. described rutin, quercetin, and 4-hydroxybenzonate in Hokkai T10 hairy roots [23], and Kim et al. detected 4-hydroxybenzonate, chlorogenic acid, t-cinnamic acid, rutin, and quercetin in Tartary buckwheat plantlets [24]. The results obtained in this study indicated that continuous darkness treatment did not affect the phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis in the GUS- and three ZmLC-transgenic hairy root lines of Tartary buckwheat, whereas the long-photoperiod treatment enhanced the biosynthesis of these lines. Therefore, it is suggested that the effect of ZmLC on the accumulation of phenolics, including flavonoids, was light-induced, which is corroborated by previous studies describing the exogenous expression of ZmLC in petunia [17,25], tomato [26], alfalfa [18], and cotton [19] exhibiting light-induced anthocyanin pigmentation. Specifically, Albert et al. [17] and Bradley et al. [25] reported that anthocyanin accumulation was improved in ZmLC-transgenic petunia plants grown under high light conditions. Tomato seedlings heterologously expressing ZmLC and ZmC1 had three- to four-fold greater anthocyanin concentrations than wild-type seedlings under light stress [26]. Furthermore, ZmLC was highly expressed in ZmLC-overexpressing alfalfa leaves, whereas anthocyanin production was found only under high light intensity [18]. Fan et al. reported that ZmLC-transgenic cotton plants exhibited white fibers that changed to red after light treatment [19].
Many studies have focused on the enhancement of flavonoid production in bacteria [27,28], yeast [29], and plants [21]. Hairy roots from various plant species have been developed for the production of phenolic compounds because of their ability to produce large amounts of metabolites and their high growth rates [30]. Light intensity, irradiance (continuous irradiance or continuous darkness), and quality can be paramount in the greening, growth, and metabolite biosynthesis of hairy roots. Jacob and Malpathak reported that light irradiation turned the roots of Acmella oppositifolia, Lippia dulcis, and Datura stramonium green and increased their phytochemical yield [31]. Light significantly increased the concentration of rutin in the hairy roots of F. tataricum Hokkai T10, and baicalein in hairy root cultures of Scutellaria lateriflora compared to the dark-grown roots of these species [23,32]. Abbasi et al. exposed the hairy roots of Echinacea purpurea to 50-days of continuous light (60 μmol·s−1·m−2) and found increased concentrations of anthocyanins caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and cichoric acid compared with the samples in continuous darkness [33]. Liu et al. reported a greater artemisinin yield in Artemisia annua hairy roots with an increase in light intensity of up to 3000 lux [34]. In this study, phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis were upregulated under a relatively low light intensity (30 μmol·s−1·m−2) in Hokkai T10 hairy roots overexpressing ZmLC. Therefore, further research on the optimization of light intensity to improve the phenolic compound production in transgenic hairy roots should be performed.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

HPLC grade methanol were purchased from Samchun Pure Chemical, Pyeongtaek, Korea. Ethanol, NaClO, and acetic acid were purchased from Daejung, Siheung, Korea. LB broth, SH medium, cefotaxime, and kanamycin were purchased from Kisanbio, Seoul, Korea.

4.2. Plant Materials

Hokkai T10 seeds were obtained from the National Agricultural Research Center (Hokkaido, Japan). The seeds were soaked in 70% aqueous ethanol (v/v) for 1 min, followed by 4% NaClO for 10 min. After rinsing the seeds with sterilized water five times, they were incubated on half-strength SH solid medium (pH 5.8) in a growth chamber at 25 °C under normal white fluorescent bulbs with a flux rate of 30 μmol·s−1·m−2 and a long photoperiod (16 h light and 8 h dark) for 3 weeks, in preparation for hairy root induction.

4.3. Hairy Root Induction

The protocol for hairy root induction was that of Thew et al. [20]. Agrobacterium rhizogenes R1000 strains harboring pB7FWG2, ZmLC, or GUS pB7FWG2, were incubated in 30 mL of LB broth at 180 rpm and 28 °C for 1 d. After centrifugation (A600 = 0.6) and removal of the supernatant, the cell pellet was resuspended in SH liquid medium. The buckwheat seedlings were cut to the appropriate size in a Petri dish (Hyundai Micro, Seoul, Korea), containing the A. rhizogenes suspension and incubated for 20 min, followed by drying by patting with sterile paper for suspension removal. Subsequently, the explants were loaded onto an SH solid medium and then co-cultured in continuous darkness at 25 °C. After 2 days, the explants were rinsed with autoclaved water and then patted dry with sterile paper. They were then incubated on a half-strength SH solid medium containing 500 mg/L cefotaxime and 50 g/mL kanamycin. Hairy roots began to appear at the infected sites of the explants within 3 weeks, at which time the individual hairy roots were cultured on a half-strength SH solid medium containing 500 mg/L cefotaxime and 50 g/mL kanamycin at 25 °C in continuous darkness for 4 weeks. After transferring each hairy root onto fresh SH solid medium, the roots were cultured for an additional 4 weeks. Five grams of each hairy root line was then suspended in 30 mL of half-strength SH liquid medium at 110 rpm and 25 °C in continuous darkness for 2 weeks. The ZmLC- or GUS-transgenic hairy root lines were harvested and ground with liquid nitrogen. Some of the sample powders were used for DNA and RNA extraction, and the remaining samples were freeze-dried for secondary metabolite analysis.

4.4. Extraction of Genomic DNA and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Analysis

Genomic DNA of three ZmLC-transgenic lines and one GUS-transgenic hairy root line of Tartary buckwheat were isolated using a plant DNA extraction kit (Geneaid Biotech Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan). The primers for rol A–D and bar genes and conditions for the PCR reaction were based on a previous study [35]. PCR products of the expected lengths (500, 360, 900, 514, and 1035 bp) of bar and rol A, B, C, and D, respectively, were separated on a 1% agarose gel (data not shown).

4.5. Extraction of Total RNA and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA of three ZmLC-transgenic lines and one GUS-transgenic hairy root line of Tartary buckwheat was isolated using the CTAB method combined with the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). The quantity of RNA extracted from each line was measured using a NanoVue Plus spectrophotometer (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), and the quality of RNA was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. One microgram of each hairy root line RNA was reverse-transcribed using a First Strand Synthesis Kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and PCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After a twenty-fold dilution of each cDNA, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed.

4.6. Gene Expression Analysis

A CFX96 Real-Time System combined with a C1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used with gene-specific primers to express FtPAL, FtC4H, Ft4CL, FtCHS, FtCHI, FtF3H, FtF3′H1, FtFLS2, FtDFR, FtLAR, and FtANS in three ZmLC-transgenic and one GUS-transgenic hairy root line of Tartary buckwheat, as previously reported by Li et al. [21]. The reaction was started with a pre-denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, primer annealing at 60 °C for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 20 s, and final amplification at 72 °C for 15 min. Three technical and biological replicates of the four lines of Tartary buckwheat were used for the reaction.

4.7. HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

HPLC analysis of phenolic compounds in ZmLC- and GUS-transgenic hairy root lines of Tartary buckwheat was performed according to the method reported by Park et al. [35]. Briefly, 1.5 mL of 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol was added to a tube containing 100 mg of three ZmLC-transgenic and one GUS-transgenic hairy root line and vortexed for 1 min. After sonication for 1 h and centrifugation at 11,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 min, the supernatant was syringe-filtered into a vial. Phenolics were separated using methanol (A) and 0.2% acetic acid-water (B). The HPLC system (NS-4000, Futecs Co., Daejeon, Korea), column (OptimaPak, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm, RStech Co., Daejeon, Korea), and analysis conditions were obtained from a previous study [35]. Comparison of retention time and spiking tests were performed to identify the phenolics, and the calibration curves for each phenolic compound were used to determine the concentration in the samples.

5. Conclusions

This is the first study on the effect of continuous light and darkness on the accumulation of phenolic compounds, including rutin, in ZmLC-transgenic hairy roots through the enhancement of phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthesis in hairy roots cultured under continuous light. Furthermore, this study suggested that Tartary buckwheat Hokkai T10 can be a viable plant source for the application of metabolic engineering with the aim of overproducing beneficial metabolites.

Author Contributions

S.U.P. conceived and designed the experiments. C.H.P., Y.E.P., H.J.Y. and N.I.P. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. C.H.P. wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) (NRF- 2019R1A2C1005171), Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bonafaccia, G.; Marocchini, M.; Kreft, I. Composition and technological properties of the flour and bran from common and tartary buckwheat. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kawa, J.M.; Taylor, C.G.; Przybylski, R. Buckwheat concentrate reduces serum glucose in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7287–7291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chan, P.-K. Inhibition of tumor growth in vitro by the extract of fagopyrum cymosum (fago-c). Life Sci. 2003, 72, 1851–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ujita, M.; Nagayama, H.; Kanie, S.; Koike, S.; Ikeyama, Y.; Ozaki, T.; Okumura, H. Carbohydrate binding specificity of recombinant human macrophage β-glucan receptor dectin-1. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hu, Z.B.; Du, M. Hairy root and its application in plant genetic engineering. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2006, 48, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shanks, J.V.; Morgan, J. Plant ‘hairy root’culture. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1999, 10, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, Y.J.; Wyslouzil, B.E.; Weathers, P.J. Secondary metabolism of hairy root cultures in bioreactors. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2002, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Makhzoum, A.B.; Sharma, P.; Bernards, M.A.; Trémouillaux-Guiller, J. Hairy roots: An ideal platform for transgenic plant production and other promising applications. In Phytochemicals, Plant Growth, and the Environment; David, R.G., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 42, pp. 95–142. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ludwig, S.R.; Habera, L.F.; Dellaporta, S.L.; Wessler, S.R. Lc, a member of the maize R gene family responsible for tissue-specific anthocyanin production, encodes a protein similar to transcriptional activators and contains the myc-homology region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 7092–7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Huang, Z.-A.; Zhao, T.; Wang, N.; Zheng, S.-S. Ectopic expression of Lc differentially regulated anthocyanin biosynthesis in the floral parts of tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum L.) plants. Bot. Stud. 2016, 57, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Li, H.H.; Flachowsky, H.; Fischer, T.C.; Hanke, M.-V.; Forkmann, G.; Treutter, D.; Schwab, W.; Hoffmann, T.; Szankowski, I. Maize Lc transcription factor enhances biosynthesis of anthocyanins, distinct proanthocyanidins and phenylpropanoids in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Planta 2007, 226, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Park, C.H.; Xu, H.; Yeo, H.J.; Park, Y.E.; Hwang, G.-S.; Park, N.I.; Park, S.U. Enhancement of the flavone contents of Scutellaria baicalensis hairy roots via metabolic engineering using maize Lc and Arabidopsis PAP1 transcription factors. Metab. Eng. 2021, 64, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Boase, M.R.; Bradley, J.M.; Borst, N.K. Genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens of florists’ chrysanthemum (Dendranthema xgrandiflorum) cultivar ‘Peach Margaret’. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 1998, 34, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bradley, J.M.; Deroles, S.C.; Boase, M.R.; Bloor, S.; Swinny, E.; Davies, K.M. Variation in the ability of the maize Lc regulatory gene to upregulate flavonoid biosynthesis in heterologous systems. Plant Sci. 1999, 140, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, Y.-J.; Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, S.J.; Cho, K.-C.; Chandrasekhar, T.; Song, P.-S.; Woo, Y.-M.; Kim, J.-I. Production of purple-colored creeping bentgrass using maize transcription factor genes Pl and Lc through Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Procissi, A.; Dolfini, S.; Ronchi, A.; Tonelli, C. Light-dependent spatial and temporal expression of pigment regulatory genes in developing maize seeds. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1547–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Albert, N.W.; Lewis, D.H.; Zhang, H.; Irving, L.J.; Jameson, P.E.; Davies, K. Light-induced vegetative anthocyanin pigmentation in Petunia. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2191–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ray, H.; Yu, M.; Auser, P.; Blahut-Beatty, L.; McKersie, B.; Bowley, S.; Westcott, N.; Coulman, B.; Lloyd, A.; Gruber, M.Y. Expression of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins after transformation of alfalfa with maize Lc. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1448–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fan, X.; Fan, B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, W. Anthocyanin accumulation enhanced in Lc-transgenic cotton under light and increased resistance to bollworm. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2016, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Thwe, A.; Valan Arasu, M.; Li, X.; Park, C.H.; Kim, S.J.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Park, S.U. Effect of different Agrobacterium rhizogenes strains on hairy root induction and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn). Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, X.; Sathasivam, R.; Park, N.I.; Wu, Q.; Park, S.U. Enhancement of phenylpropanoid accumulation in tartary buckwheat hairy roots by overexpression of MYB transcription factors. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 156, 112887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, Y.K.; Li, X.; Xu, H.; Park, N.I.; Uddin, M.R.; Pyon, J.Y.; Park, S.U. Production of phenolic compounds in hairy root culture of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn). J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 2009, 12, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Thwe, A.A.; Kim, Y.J.; Li, X.; Kim, Y.B.; Park, N.-I.; Kim, H.H.; Kim, S.-J.; Park, S.U. Accumulation of phenylpropanoids and correlated gene expression in hairy roots of tartary buckwheat under light and dark conditions. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 174, 2537–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, N.S.; Kwon, S.-J.; Cuong, D.M.; Jeon, J.; Park, J.S.; Park, S.U. Accumulation of phenylpropanoids in tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) under salt stress. Agronomy 2019, 9, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bradley, J.M.; Davies, K.M.; Deroles, S.C.; Bloor, S.J.; Lewis, D.H. The maize Lc regulatory gene up-regulates the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway of Petunia. Plant J. 1998, 13, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bovy, A.; de Vos, R.; Kemper, M.; Schijlen, E.; Pertejo, M.A.; Muir, S.; Collins, G.; Robinson, S.; Verhoeyen, M.; Hughes, S. High-flavonol tomatoes resulting from the heterologous expression of the maize transcription factor genes LC and C1. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2509–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, J.; Tian, C.; Xia, Y.; Mutanda, I.; Wang, K.; Wang, Y. Production of plant-specific flavones baicalein and scutellarein in an engineered E. coli from available phenylalanine and tyrosine. Metab. Eng. 2019, 52, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Solopova, A.; van Tilburg, A.Y.; Foito, A.; Allwood, J.W.; Stewart, D.; Kulakauskas, S.; Kuipers, O.P. Engineering Lactococcus lactis for the production of unusual anthocyanins using tea as substrate. Metab. Eng. 2019, 54, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sáez-Sáez, J.; Wang, G.; Marella, E.R.; Sudarsan, S.; Pastor, M.C.; Borodina, I. Engineering the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for high-level resveratrol production. Metab. Eng. 2020, 62, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, C.H.; Zhao, S.; Yeo, H.J.; Park, Y.E.; Baska, T.B.; Arasu, M.V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Park, S.U. Comparison of Different Strains of Agrobacterium rhizogenes for Hairy Root Induction and Betulin and Betulinic Acid Production in Morus alba. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2017, 12, 1934578X1701200403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jacob, A.; Malpathak, N. Green hairy root cultures of Solanum khasianum Clarke—A new route to in vitro solasodine production. Curr. Sci. 2004, 1442–1447. [Google Scholar]
  32. Marsh, Z.; Yang, T.; Nopo-Olazabal, L.; Wu, S.; Ingle, T.; Joshee, N.; Medina-Bolivar, F. Effect of light, methyl jasmonate and cyclodextrin on production of phenolic compounds in hairy root cultures of Scutellaria lateriflora. Phytochem 2014, 107, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Abbasi, B.H.; Tian, C.-L.; Murch, S.J.; Saxena, P.K.; Liu, C.-Z. Light-enhanced caffeic acid derivatives biosynthesis in hairy root cultures of Echinacea Purpurea. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, C.-Z.; Guo, C.; Wang, Y.-C.; Ouyang, F. Effect of light irradiation on hairy root growth and artemisinin biosynthesis of Artemisia Annu. Process Biochem. 2002, 38, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cuong, D.M.; Park, C.H.; Bong, S.J.; Kim, N.S.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Enhancement of glucosinolate production in watercress (Nasturtium officinale) hairy roots by overexpressing cabbage transcription factors. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 4860–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 04702 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed biosynthetic pathways for phenylpropanoid and flavonoids in Tartary Buckwheat hairy roots overexpressing ZmLC after dark and light treatment, respectively. Italicized red and blue text indicate significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively (p < 0.05), after dark and light treatment, respectively, whereas the italicized green text indicates genes that failed to show any significant differences. Red and blue text indicate a significant decrease and increase in phenolic compounds, respectively (p < 0.05), after dark and light treatment, respectively, whereas the green text indicates phenolic compounds that failed to show any significant differences.
Figure 1. Proposed biosynthetic pathways for phenylpropanoid and flavonoids in Tartary Buckwheat hairy roots overexpressing ZmLC after dark and light treatment, respectively. Italicized red and blue text indicate significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively (p < 0.05), after dark and light treatment, respectively, whereas the italicized green text indicates genes that failed to show any significant differences. Red and blue text indicate a significant decrease and increase in phenolic compounds, respectively (p < 0.05), after dark and light treatment, respectively, whereas the green text indicates phenolic compounds that failed to show any significant differences.
Ijms 22 04702 g001
Ijms 22 04702 g002 550
Figure 2. qRT-PCR analysis for ZmLC of GUS- and ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines.
Figure 2. qRT-PCR analysis for ZmLC of GUS- and ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines.
Ijms 22 04702 g002
Ijms 22 04702 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of dark treatment on the expression profiles of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Effect of dark treatment on the expression profiles of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 22 04702 g003
Ijms 22 04702 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of dark treatment on the phenolic compound accumulation of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4. Effect of dark treatment on the phenolic compound accumulation of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 22 04702 g004
Ijms 22 04702 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of light treatment on the expression profiles of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLc-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Effect of light treatment on the expression profiles of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLc-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 22 04702 g005
Ijms 22 04702 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of light treatment on the phenolic compound accumulation of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Figure 6. Effect of light treatment on the phenolic compound accumulation of hairy root cultures in Fagopyrum tataricum. C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line 1; LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines. Asterisks represent statistical significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 22 04702 g006
Table
Table 1. Fresh weight (g) of GUS- and ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines cultured at 25 °C in continuous darkness for two weeks.
Table 1. Fresh weight (g) of GUS- and ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines cultured at 25 °C in continuous darkness for two weeks.
LineFresh Weight (g)
C 11.52 ± 0.10
LC1 21.83 ± 0.45
LC21.69 ± 0.18
LC32.04 ± 0.21
1 C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line; 2 LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines.
Table
Table 2. Fresh weight (g) of GUS- and ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines cultured at 25 °C in the long-photoperiod condition for two weeks.
Table 2. Fresh weight (g) of GUS- and ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines cultured at 25 °C in the long-photoperiod condition for two weeks.
LineFresh Weight (g)
C 11.83 ± 0.86
LC1 23.25 ± 1.25
LC22.45 ± 0.95
LC32.11 ± 0.57
1 C: GUS-overexpressing hairy root line; 2 LCn: ZmLC-overexpressing hairy root lines.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, C.H.; Park, Y.E.; Yeo, H.J.; Park, N.I.; Park, S.U. Effect of Light and Dark on the Phenolic Compound Accumulation in Tartary Buckwheat Hairy Roots Overexpressing ZmLC. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094702

AMA Style

Park CH, Park YE, Yeo HJ, Park NI, Park SU. Effect of Light and Dark on the Phenolic Compound Accumulation in Tartary Buckwheat Hairy Roots Overexpressing ZmLC. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(9):4702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Chang Ha, Ye Eun Park, Hyeon Ji Yeo, Nam Il Park, and Sang Un Park. 2021. "Effect of Light and Dark on the Phenolic Compound Accumulation in Tartary Buckwheat Hairy Roots Overexpressing ZmLC" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 9: 4702. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop