Next Article in Journal
Partial Rescue of F508del-CFTR Stability and Trafficking Defects by Double Corrector Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Protective Effect of Water-Soluble C60 Fullerene Nanoparticles on the Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury of the Muscle Soleus in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Nanomaterial Shape Influence on Cell Behavior
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Eco-Friendly Approach to the Control of Pathogenic Microbes and Anopheles stephensi Malarial Vector Using Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles (Mg-NPs) Fabricated by Penicillium chrysogenum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nucleic Acid Delivery with Red-Blood-Cell-Based Carriers

by
Giulia Della Pelle
1,2,* and
Nina Kostevšek
1
1
Department for Nanostructured Materials, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(10), 5264; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105264
Submission received: 28 April 2021 / Revised: 11 May 2021 / Accepted: 12 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticles and Their Biological and Biomedical Application)

Abstract

:
Gene therapy has the potential to become a staple of 21st-century medicine. However, to overcome the limitations of existing gene-delivery therapies, that is, poor stability and inefficient and delivery and accumulation of nucleic acids (NAs), safe drug-delivery systems (DDSs) allowing the prolonged circulation and expression of the administered genes in vivo are needed. In this review article, the development of DDSs over the past 70 years is briefly described. Since synthetic DDSs can be recognized and eliminated as foreign substances by the immune system, new approaches must be found. Using the body’s own cells as DDSs is a unique and exciting strategy and can be used in a completely new way to overcome the critical limitations of existing drug-delivery approaches. Among the different circulatory cells, red blood cells (RBCs) are the most abundant and thus can be isolated in sufficiently large quantities to decrease the complexity and cost of the treatment compared to other cell-based carriers. Therefore, in the second part, this article describes 70 years of research on the development of RBCs as DDSs, covering the most important RBC properties and loading methods. In the third part, it focuses on RBCs as the NA delivery system with advantages and drawbacks discussed to decide whether they are suitable for NA delivery in vivo.

1. Introduction

Despite some successes, the effective treatment of most cancers remains problematic for several reasons: the lack of drug specificity and the drug-resistant properties of cancer cells and metastases that are a major contributor to the deaths of cancer patients. In recent years, the development of sophisticated genomic, proteomic and bioinformatics techniques have made it possible for us to glimpse the intricate interplay of numerous cellular genes and regulatory genetic elements responsible for cancerous phenotypes. As a result, one of the key advances in this new era is gene therapy, which focuses on the therapeutic delivery of nucleic acids (NAs), such as the small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) or plasmid DNA (pDNA), into a patient’s cells to replace the abnormal or absent genes with healthy ones. However, NAs present challenges related to stability and in vivo delivery that need to be overcome [1,2]. For example, NAs are prone to degradation by enzymes, are rapidly excreted from the body and negatively charged, which limits their uptake in target tissues and cells [3]. The introduction of large quantities of double-stranded RNA in mammalian cells also activates interferon-related pathways [4]. Therefore, safe delivery systems, allowing the prolonged circulation and expression of the administered genes in vivo must be developed [5].
A drug-delivery system (DDS) must carry a sufficient amount of drug to the target site with the most efficient kinetics, avoiding side effects. The DDS should improve the drug’s water solubility, thermostability and reduce susceptibility to degrading enzymes. The ideal DDS must add at least another function to the whole formulation [6], for example, “theranostic” approaches, combining therapeutic and diagnostic abilities [7,8,9]. Currently, most of NAs carriers has a cationic charge in order to maximize stability of the formulation and to enhance cell delivery [10], while there are some concerns about the toxicity; therefore, neutral or mildly anionic materials to entrap or carry NA have begun to be investigated, to ensure a better bio-compatibility and broad the application range [11].
Though highly developed and well-characterized, most synthetic DDSs are recognized and eliminated as a foreign substance by the immune system. To overcome this, biomimetic cell-membrane-based nano-carriers were proposed. Disguised by the cell membranes, the drugs, nanoparticles or other active components can act as autogenous material due to their bio-compatibility. Among the different circulatory cells (monocyte, erythrocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, leukocyte, dendritic cells, stem cells, and extracellular vesicles), red blood cells (RBCs) are the most abundant and thus can be isolated in sufficiently large quantities to decrease the complexity and cost of the treatment compared to other cell-based carriers [12,13]. Later in this paper, the state of the art for the use of the red blood cells (RBCs) as drug carriers will be presented. Since the delivery of NAs has great promise for the treatment of several diseases, in Section 4 we will focus on the delivery of NAs with both whole RBCs and derived vesicles as their carriers. This is the first systematic review of erythrocytes used as NA-based drug carriers. In addition, the so-far unexploited advantages and the drawbacks will be examined.

2. Evolution of Drug-Delivery Systems (DDSs)

The first DDS was introduced in 1953, based on Spansule® technology [14], while the first incorporation of a drug into non-toxic polymers occurred in 1976 [15], leading to the concepts of “sustained release” and “controlled release”. The number of papers and achievements has grown exponentially since then [6,16]. For a long time, chemists and pharmacologists searched for, with polymeric, encapsulated or via mechanical devices, a zero order, that is, a totally controlled [17,18,19] pharmacokinetic, to maintain the concentration of the drug. This led to a huge increase in the research of biocompatible polymers and hydrogels. Later it was realized that a zero-order kinetic of release is not necessary to achieve an efficient pharmacology effect, so the idea was abandoned [20]. This led to the development of pH, temperature, light, redox reactions, ultrasound, triggered DDS, made up of various biodegradable materials that promote a secondary effect, for example, immunogenic or anti-inflammatory [21].
The greatest successes have been achieved with nanotechnologies [22] and the re-purposing of old molecules resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic [23,24,25]. Liposome encapsulation is the technique of choice for last-generation DDSs [26]. Liposomes are easy to synthesize and modify to add new features such as a liquid-crystal transition-point shift, membrane rigidity or conjugation with stealth polymers. They represent the most cost-effective nanostructure. Furthermore, liposomal formulations are capable of the so-called EPR effect (enhanced permeability and retention) [27]. Such nanostructures extravasate easily and tend to accumulate in the proximity of tumors due to the leaky nature of tumor blood vessels, rich in fenestrations and poor in smooth muscles. So far, in humans, the effect has only been widely documented for Doxil® [28], while there remains widespread skepticism about the existence of this phenomenon in humans [29].
There are only a few drugs approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) that exploit a liposomal DDS [30]: doxorubicin, sold as Doxil® or Caelyx® [28], amphotericin B, sold as AmBisome®, and MM-398®/Onivyde, a irinotecan-loaded nanoliposome formulation containing 5-fluoro-uracil [31]. Recently, there is the Pfizer-BioNTech Sars-cov-2 vaccine (an mRNA contained in DSPC liposomes, NCT04368728). The Thermodox [32,33] formulation, containing a lysolipid, is actually in phase-III clinical trials for radio-frequency ablation treatment. DSPE-PEG2000 is present in a 10:90 lipid ratio, enough to show a “stealth effect”, while MSPC (1–4%) lysolipid ensures a payload release upon heating. Examples of targeted, differentially loaded, coated, liposomes are numerous in the literature [26,34,35].
Artificial nanoparticles (polymeric, dendrimeric, liposomal or combinatory approaches) are often recognized as non-self by the immune system [36,37], so compromising both the “non nocere” principle to healthy tissues and the appropriate circulation time, jeopardizing the overall therapeutic effect. The most famous example is the case of polyethylene glycol (PEG), a commonly used excipient, known to shield its cargo from the Reticuloendothelial System (RES) (or Mononuclear Phagocytic System [38,39] It acts as a hapten when bound to protein drugs such as IFNα [40], but there are only a few studies indicating the presence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) against PEG elicited by liposomal PEG formulations [41,42,43,44]. Similarly, an immune reaction is elicited towards polyamidoamine (PAMAM), only when bound to a protein carrier, whatever the identity [45]. Initially, artificial nanoparticles were synthesized to be “ignored” by the macrophages, omitting a thorough characterization of how properties like shape, zeta-potential, and solubility influence the immunogenicity of the carrier [37,46]. After realizing that a totally inert nanocarrier cannot be synthesized, effort was put into the codification of a so-called “nano-bio barrier” [47,48] and bring to a new level the “stealth effect” on RES: bio-mimesis, to enhance drug release and elicit/modulate/avoid immune reactions. For instance, newly developed poloxamers like Pluronic® block copolymers [49,50] and the ever-growing application of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PGLA) [51,52,53], paved the way for a new generation of (tentative) DDS, that is, cell-based systems. So, although liposome formulations remain the most used, cell-based DDSs could soon compete. Here we describe how erythrocytes have been used to encapsulate NAs for use as drugs. We will emphasize the shape, geometry, surface potential, membrane permeability of erythrocytes and nanoparticles, and we attempt to decide whether they are suitable for NA delivery in vivo.

3. Erythrocyte-Based DDSs

3.1. The Single Erythrocyte: A Complex System

Erythrocytes are the most abundant cells in our bodies, representing 70% of all the cells in the average adult human. They are conserved in the cell lines of all mammals, devoted to oxygen transportation by hemoglobin (Hb), a four-heme-ringed protein they are packed with [54], and of carbon dioxide in the form of bicarbonate ions. They are an approximately 8-µm biconcave disk, anucleated, with a lifespan of 120 days [55]. Their membrane can be considered, from the DDS point of view, a perfect stealth, biocompatible, highly deformable (up to 3 µm in capillaries) [56,57], coating for drugs and diagnostic agents. It is made of phospholipids plus a considerable amount of cholesterol (up to 30% in mass [58]) and shows unique elastic properties due to its cytoskeletal reticulum, composed of different proteins, collectively known as spectrin [59,60], assisted by actin and ankyrin. A different phospholipid content, in the two leaflets of the membrane, is kept constant by flippase and floppase [61,62,63] (the cholesterol is equally distributed) and, furthermore, by calpain (an enzyme hydrolyzing protein membrane anchorages to actin) and gelsolin (that severs actin filaments). All of these enzymes are activated by the presence of calcium ions. Indeed, flippase inactivation leads to membrane budding, leading to natural extracellular vesicles [64,65,66]. Erythrocytes are also the cells in the human body that release the most extracellular vesicles. They lose, by aging, around 30% of their dry mass by budding. However, this is not a completely random process. It is known that the responsibility for this budding lies with the phosphatidylserine’s presence in the outer leaflet and that, probably, clearance towards the membrane attack complex of a complement protein system [67]. The required ATP for membrane-lipid-related reactions is provided by glycolysis Embden- Meyerhof enzymes and it accounts for nearly all the energy expended by an erythrocyte [68,69]. With respect to the elastic properties of the erythrocyte membrane, it was observed that the membrane is able to form tethers in RBCs too [70,71]. As recently reviewed by Ciana [72], erythrocyte exhibits a web-like network of lipid rafts, mostly composed of glycosphingolipids, sphingomyelins, and cholesterol, an anchorage site for spectrin cytoskeleton. So, any contamination with circulating granulocytes, containing proteases and hydrolases, in ex vivo conditions, damages the erythrocyte structure. Erythrocyte’s physiological shape is biconcave, while stomatocytes and echinocytes are pathological three-dimensional structures [73]. The molecular bases of such an arrangement are still unknown, but they probably rely on the different membrane densities between the rim and the dimple of the cell [74] (more details in Section 4.2.1).
Erythrocyte proteome and interactome have been the subject of much research in the past 10 years, leading to discover of a considerable complexity [75,76,77]. Interestingly, it was only during the 1970s that researchers began to realize that RBCs are not only Hb containers. They are also involved in an innate immune response, transferring opsonized particles to macrophages with CR1 protein [78], cytokine storm clearance [79], ROS protection [80], and, of course, initiators of blood clotting by phosphatidylserine (usually confined on the inner leaflet) exposure via a pro-thrombin pathway [81,82]. Erythrocytes also exhibit the so-called, for macrophages, “don’t eat me!” marker CD47 [75,83,84], allowing them to be recognized as self by the RES (specifically by SIRPα receptor on macrophages [78]). They also possess an integral protein, called the decay-accelerating factor, that inhibits complement activation [85]. Their aging process is related to the loss of a segment of the band-3 protein, which is lacking only in senescent cells. This has been known for a long time as the “senescent antigen”. So far, it is the only known auto-immunogenic feature of these cells [86] in the absence of illnesses. A glycocalyx component, sialic acid, also has a huge role in complement complex activation; it usually inhibits complement cascade initiation, but once this begins, it acts as a promoter [87]. Its crystal structure has been recently (2015) elucidated [88].
These properties are an elegant compromise among easy functionalization, loading efficiency, and biocompatibility, with nearly every patient taking care of blood type. The synthesis of erythrocyte ghosts (i.e., erythrocytes depleted of Hb) is easy and quick [5,89]. Anucleated in humans, a non-coding RNA has only recently [90] been discovered in human RBCs. Furthermore, RBCs proteome has been already characterized also with the recent evidence of a nitric oxide synthase in inner leaflet of the cytoplasmatic membrane [91], while a ribonuclease T2 activity was reported by Kabanova et al. in 2009 [92]. Conversely, human erythrocytes are naturally rich in an aspecific RNAse inhibitor, of 31 kDa [93], that, in vitro, removed any RNAse activity in the erythrocyte lysates. Virtually, the RBCs, lacking a nucleus, despite the afore-mentioned conflicting data, could have the advantage of avoiding horizontal gene transfer and, therefore, spreading malevolent mutations. This could be a problem with other cell-type-based carriers.
Being so ductile, self-marked, capable of natural tropism towards soft tissues, and intrinsically nuclease-free, erythrocytes have been used as a cargo for NAs: the red cell loading modalities as be applied to NA delivery will be described in the next section.

3.2. Development of RBCs as DDSs: Main Techniques

A ground-breaking paper in 1973 [94] a new era for RBC use. Garrett Ihler and his team demonstrated that enzymes up to 180 kDa can be trapped inside an erythrocyte ghost. This term was first used by Hoffmann [95], who also developed a rapid protocol to allow the RBC to release its Hb based on osmotic shocks. This approach became the golden rule for subsequent experimentation with RBC membranes, and led to numerous refinements (already reviewed in the 1980s [96]), as far as they can be carried out in non-pyrogenic conditions. The topic of drug delivery via RBC ghosts was enriched by the Muzykantov group [97]. Multiple techniques have been developed to improve the use of the RBC membrane as a carrier or disguising agent for drugs; they can be divided into three major groups:
  • Surface functionalization (also called external loading);
  • Coatings for nanoparticles;
  • Erythrocyte ghosts and nano-erythrosomes (internal loading);
We will focus on point three, with special attention on NA loading (Table 1). We suggest consulting [23,89,98,99] about points 1 and 2.

3.3. Internal Loading Methods

3.3.1. Hypotonic (pre) Swelling

This cluster of methods relies on the capability of the erythrocyte (full or ghost) to form transient pores of 200–500 nm [107] if the surrounding environment is hypotonic [108,109] (Figure 1).
The membrane double layer is also subjected to engulfment. When the membrane comes into contact with an isotonic medium, which may or not contain the drug of interest, it reseals, and the erythrocyte returns to its initial volume, while the drug passively flows inside the ghost, where it is trapped. The same approach is widely used to deplete the erythrocyte from Hb [95,110]. Of course, multiple variations of this have been developed, like Hb precipitation with PEG [111], pre-incubation with a hypotonic drug solution and then hypertonic resealing [112], and gradual drug loading [109]. In the only recent paper on the efficient loading of RBC ghosts with plasmidic DNA [100], Larson et al. pre-swelled them in hypotonic phosphate buffer, incubated with plasmidic DNA, than concluded with resealing, adding a hypertonic solution of sodium chloride. The hypotonic pre-swelling approach was commonly used in the 1980s to load RBC ghosts with both RNA and DNA. A complex method for PEG6000-mediated fusion was developed by Wiberg [101], who did not see the RBC ghosts as drug carriers, but as transfecting agents. Earlier, [103] applied a similar techniqueto convey tRNA to a cultured cell. Recently, for active liver targeting, antibody-conjugated, erythrocyte ghosts were loaded via hypotonic swelling with antisense nucleotides [102].
The patented red-cell loader (EryDel) is based on hypotonic pre-swelling. It is approved for blood detoxification, loading the patient’s own erythrocytes with a drug such as dexamethasone 21-phosphate and asparaginase [115,116]. These formulations are in clinical trials II/III [117,118].
Hypotonic swelling’s advantages are its blandness, mild conditions (usually room temperature), variability that can be technically applied (also in terms of scalability), and, importantly, the relatively limited damage inflicted to the membrane structure and the mimetic ability of the erythrocyte. Nevertheless, the technique is not suitable for every compound. The molecule should be highly water soluble or must be loaded as a pro-drug (i.e., functionalized with phosphate, citrate, lysin, etc.) to enhance the water solubility, to diffuse inside the swollen erythrocyte and should be chemically inert towards ghost glycocalyx, to avoid external binding and reduce the encapsulation efficiency.

3.3.2. Dialysis Methods

The principle of dialysis has been applied to erythrocyte ghosts for loading. Most commonly, a bag containing an isotonic solution of erythrocyte ghosts is inserted into 4–10 volumes of a hypotonic solution containing the drug, that passively diffuses inside the bag. The latter cut off being below the molecular weight of the drug [119]. The method was established and refined by Ihler for glucocerebrosidase [120] and recently used by Levene et al. in the successful (currently trial II) encapsulation of [121] thymidine phosphorylase. The GRASPA® formulation, containing for lymphoblastic leukemia is based on dialysis for human L-asparaginase (whose model can be found in fig.1 as elucidated by [113]) loading in erythrocytes [122]. However, despite having passed trial III in 2010, it has not received EMA approval. EryTech developed EryCaps®, the French counterpart to the red-cell loader, based on hypotonic dialysis [123] with single-use cartridges. A formulation containing E. coli thymidine phosphorilase is also undergoing clinical trials [114] (fig.1). Despite being one of the easiest and most ductile loading methods, there are just three examples of this technique used to load NAs [104,105,106]. This could be due to the high levels of sterility required and nuclease inhibitors needed to be added to the buffer.

3.3.3. Electroporation

Electroporation is the preferred technique to deliver small molecules, proteins or NAs into a cell or a liposome because of the controllability of the physical parameters, the high transfection yields and the preparative procedures [124]. Therefore, the thermodynamic parameters and the density of the created membrane pores depend on the power and duration of the electrical pulse. The phenomenon is also dependent on the membrane’s surface potential, shape, intrinsic permeability and membrane dielectric constant. The electroporation experiments must be specifically optimized for each cell line [125,126]. A number of automatic devices exist [124]. Electroporation has been widely used to lysate [127] and to load erythrocyte ghosts. Usually, the RBCs are suspended from a known hematocrit in an isotonic medium, also containing the drug to be entrapped, subjected to a single pulse of tens of kV/cm (~300 V applied by the electrode) (Figure 1), or more pulses at lower kV/cm, and immediately transferred to a pre-heated isotonic medium to allow resealing [128]. Later, Zimmermann pioneered this approach to load RBCs with methotrexate [129]. The technique was refined for interleukin-2 [130], daunarubicin and doxorubicin [131]. Furthermore, electroporation is probably the most suitable technique for loading NAs inside a DDS. In 2014 the Nair group [13] used electroporation to load mRNA, for a tumor vaccine, with whole blood cells, being composed primarily of erythrocytes and antigen-presenting cells, taking advantage of the presence of RNAse inhibitors in the RBCs. Then, erythrocyte extracellular vesicles (membrane derived and showing similar chemical and physical properties) were used to deliver antisense oligonucleotides [66] to leukemia cells. The EVs were loaded using electroporation with a 25% encapsulation efficiency at 250 V. In addition, plasmid DNA was loaded into erythrocyte ghosts using electroporation [5]. In the same study, they demonstrated that the encapsulation shields the NAs from DNAse I and II activity.
Despite the ease of the technique and the capability to load nearly every drug by modulating the pore size and duration, electroporation remains on a laboratory scale and appears to be unsuitable for large-scale application.

4. Erythrocyte Membrane as a Carrier for NAs: State of the Art, Advantages, Potential and Drawbacks

Despite being very promising drug carriers, due to their natural role as actual carriers only a few RBC-based formulations are in clinical trials. These include RBC-encapsulated asparaginase (Erytech, Phase 3) and Kan101 (Anokion, Phase 1). Table 2 lists all the ongoing clinical trials based on erythrocyte membrane processing. There is only a small number because of technical difficulties with loading, compatibility in blood type for donor-recipient when autologous loading is not possible, a lack of characterized proteome and interactome for RBCs, the low quality of the preparations, difficult standardization, and a low encapsulation efficiency. After an initial sharp increase in papers on the topic in the 1960s and 70s, research largely stopped after the HIV outbreak [132]. During the period to 2020, on the other hand, the DDS field focused on polymers, dendrimers, antibody/aptamer conjugated artificial nanoparticles, and liposomes, neglecting RBCs. However, the number of publications grew steadily. After the emergence of companies such as Erydel, Erytech, publicly funded research again took an interest in this topic [98]. Interestingly, not even after the RNA interference discovery [133], and the opening up of new frontiers for gene therapy [134], was there an increase in the tentative loading of NAs, neither for transfection purposes nor for gene therapy. This is surprising, because, being largely devoid of RNA molecules, they do not pose a problem with horizontal gene transfer.
Erythrocyte ghost generation is a well-known and optimized process, but their use as a DDS has a number of drawbacks. Among them, reasons why they have not yet been used for NA delivery can be traced back.

4.1. A Stealth Erythrocyte Ghost: Antigen Compatibility Issue

Autologous blood should be used to avoid allergic reactions. Therefore, the loading procedure must have patient compliance and a scaled-up loading system. Allogenic blood administration is subject to the AB0 compatibility system and the Rhesus antigens (Rh) problem, present as polypeptides inside the RBC membrane (probably ionic channels, codified by adjacent loci [135]). Recently, Zhao et al. solved this problem [136], caused mainly by the most immunogenic antigen, RhD, by engineering a RBC membrane to become, via an immobilized horseradish peroxidase, shielded by a tyramine-polysialic acid 3D hydrogel structure. Therefore, safely administering the subsequently modified erythrocytes in the bloodstream. Previously, the same results for antigen D were achieved with PEGylation [137]. The immunological attenuation for the AB0 antigen system (present in erythrocytes glycocalyx) is traditionally achieved with PEGylation. The RBC ghosts are surface decorated with PEG, usually on lysine residues of Band-3 protein [138,139,140]. The resulting stability and susceptibility to lysis is very dependent on the coupling [97] and linking [141]. In addition, methoxy-PEG [142] is used. Camouflage has been used to decorate the RBC surface using maleimidophenyl-PEG via iminothiolane-mediated thiolation [143,144] or poly-dopamine [145]. Unfortunately, anti-PEG antibodies, IgM and IgG, have been detected in the adult population [40]. This could lead to phenomena like accelerated blood clearance [43], thus totally nullifying the aim of encapsulation, that is, to extend the circulation time.

4.2. Erythrocyte Membrane, Ghost Shape and Permeability: Is It Suitable for NAs Delivery?

4.2.1. Shape

Antigen compatibility leads to another issue involving the maintenance of flexibility, elasticity, and the shape of RBC ghosts. They are naturally deformable entities, but modifications to the surface reports denied any substantial difference between the regular and modified RBCs. Their rheology was intensively investigated for nearly forty years [146,147], and still thriving with the advancements in microfluidics such as “lab-on-chip” approach [148,149]. From a technical point of view, shape and rheology characterization could help scaling up RBCs processing for heterologous applications, speeding up quality assessment of starting material, a step that is currently neglected and that deserves attention.
It is however widely known that shape is a key factor in DDS design [150,151,152,153], in terms of porosity rather than symmetry [154]. As a thumb rule, irregularly shaped or extreme-aspect-ratio particles are less prone to opsonization and subsequent macrophages uptake. With increasing symmetry (i.e., cylindrical and then spherical) cells capable of phagocytosis show higher degrees of internalization and adhesion to the nanoparticles. Furthermore, sharp-edged, high-aspect-ratio nanoparticles easily achieve endosomal escape [155].
Curvature and shape also influence cell fusion [156], a process in which the membranes of two cells come into contact, first via an hemifusion (the close approach of leaflets) and later, membrane budding and conjoining. The erythrocyte membrane, rather than via the traditional PEG-mediated mechanism [157] (where PEG is able, via a still not totally clear mechanism, to help fusion of bilayers [158]), is able to fuse with other erythrocytes via a fusogenic electric pulse, by disturbing the spectrin network (Figure 2) [159]. Their fusogenic pathways are, therefore, SNARE independent [160]. Carrier-target-cell fusion is an important step in therapeutic RNA delivery, especially with exosome mimicking liposomes [161,162]. This can happen via many mechanisms, such as phagocytosis, pinocytosis, endocytosis, lipid-rafts mediate fusion, and tunnelling nanotubes [163]. How the erythrocytes’ surface properties can be optimized is discussed in Section 4.3.
The erythrocyte’s shape is approximatively biconcave. When depleted of Hb (i.e., ghosts) it is still a matter of debate whether they keep, in an isosmotic medium, such a shape, since it is known that, having an ultracomplex membrane composition and a unique cytoskeleton network, their morphology is very dependent upon electrolytes [164]. Relying mainly on the actin-spectrin network, as shown by [165], such a shape is also maintained in ghosts. Furthermore, it is still not known whether the hyperosmotic resealing of the erythrocytes affects the subsequent shape. A stomatocyte is a transient form, cup-like, as opposed to echinocyte, with the latter showing remarkable spiculations on the outer leaflet in SEM investigations [73,166]. Such behavior was partially explained by the so-called “bilayer-couple” effect, in which the more charged inner leaflet causes distortion of the membrane folding [167]. More recent insights showed that this is due to the phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine translocation and that the process is reversible when elicited by electroporation in the presence of ATP [130]. It is also caused by a chlorpromazine treatment [73,168].
In a few examples of erythrocyte used as a transfection agent [101,169,170] and loaded with NAs, the Sendai virus was first used as a fusing agent by the recipient cells to carry over the “micro-injection”, and later the PEG coating and electrostimulation (see Section 3.2). The mechanisms underlying the membrane fusion were later elucidated and in theory could be applicable to the targeted release of NAs from RBC ghosts, with cell-environment-compatible approaches [160].
Shape is a crucial parameter from the pharmacological point of view. However, erythrocytes have not been characterized in this way. It is also not known whether such processes are ATP-driven, or for how long the discoidal shape is retained in its absence. It is not even known whether aberrant forms such as spherocytes and echinocytes are somehow immunogenic and inflammatory, and whether the deformed membrane can cause early drug diffusion. In order to optimize a drug carrier, and to load it with drugs that are chemically different from what was already used, it is important to explain its overall interaction in vivo and in contact with different target tissues.

4.2.2. Permeability and Drug-Release Mechanism

There is a lack of specific pharmacokinetic characterization for the permeability and diffusion rates of the RBC membrane with respect to foreign molecules, whether it is acidic, basic, or zwitterionic. However, the ion-induced exchange of drugs between the environment and the erythrocyte is well documented [171,172]. Conversely, the semi permeability (i.e., selective permeability to different solutes) properties of the RBC membrane, dependent upon pore formation and lipidic composition, loaded with NAs of variable molecular weight are totally unknown, in terms of mechanism and kinetics. Nevertheless, it seems that loaded DNA is not released, in vitro, in 24 h [102]. It is known, however, that an increase in cholesterol and in surface protein glycation reduces the diffusion rates [58,173,174,175].
It should be pointed out that all the in-trial erythrocyte-based formulations (for example GRASPA®, asparaginase loaded in erythrocytes ghosts) contain a systemically working agent (i.e., an enzyme or a glucocorticoid), while an mRNA (for vaccines, cancer immunotherapy or heterologous expression), a siRNA and an anti-sense RNA (for gene therapy) have to be delivered straight to the target, avoiding any contact with the host tissues. Early drug diffusion (i.e., to achieve a controlled release) outside the carrier has to be avoided [176]. This could be by complexing the NA drug with nanoparticles [177,178], lipocomplexes [179] or encapsulating the active ingredient in prodrug form [116]. A glutaraldehyde treatment on a protein cytoskeleton ought to be used only in extreme cases [57]. Traditional, circulation, half-life increasing techniques, such as PEGylation or conjugation with albumin [180], can be applied to the drug [181]. Furthermore, more advanced approaches have been attempted to delay and control the drug release, for instance, through a mellitin-cobalamin hemolytic complex (light triggered) [182]. To use whole erythrocytes as a DDS in the case of gene therapy, RNA vaccines or transfection agents, will need further studies and improvement to build a reliable model comprising blood interactome, RBC proteome, and erythrocyte membrane vs. tissue membrane interactions to ensure maximum delivery timed capacity. Furthermore, natural vesiculation could also be exploited as a spontaneous sustained delivery mechanism, but more studies are needed.

4.3. Improvement of Erythrocyte-Based Drug Carriers: Nano-Erythrosomes

Cell-based therapy is promising, but there are many challenges to be faced when an established system needs adapting to a different drug. All the knowledge described in the previous section has led, as a further step in the biomimetic DDS field, to the generation of nano-erythrosomes [183,184]. Nano-erythrosomes, whose advantages and drawbacks are summarized in Table 3, can be prepared via shear-stress processes, such as sonication and the subsequent extrusion of ghosts up to 200 nm of filter size exclusion [176]. The Deàk group [185,186] characterized the rheological properties of nano-erythrosomes relative to erythrocyte ghosts. No significant protein denaturation occurred during the sonication/extrusion process. The thickness of the overall bilayer is around 11 nm (SAXS data), while for a native erythrocyte it is around 50 nm and 20–25 if compressed up to 103 Pa [187]. The samples are relatively inhomogeneous in terms of hydrodynamic radii. The lipid bilayer is 4 nm thick, while the rest is a glycocalyx forest and cytoskeleton, somewhat deformed by the shear-stress processing. Most of the peripheral proteins are then washed out, while the ones necessary for the stealth effect remain [186]. The Lejeune group reported the absence of in vivo toxicity [184]. Furthermore, the hypotonic swelling of ghosts, sonication and extrusion, do not significantly affect the membrane marker loss such as CD47 and TER119 [188]. So far, nano-erythrosomes have been used as antigen carrier for immune vaccines directed to the spleen [189], daunorubicin-decorated [184], for fasudil encapsulation [190], indocyanine green loaded [191,192], as a stealth coating for an Escherichia coli-based microswimmer [188], and loaded with iron-oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging [193]. The CD47 features are advantageous if a macrophage intracellular delivery is desired (for instance, in the case of HIV infected macrophages). For healthy erythrocytes, it usually works like “don’t eat me” markers for macrophages, that is, in senescent or unhealthy cells it undergoes conformational changes, binding other co-factors, thus acting as a promoter of phagocytosis by RES effectors [78].
A nano-erythrosome suspension can also be described with colloidal matter properties, like for other drug-delivery nanoparticles, such as zeta-potential, which is similar to native erythrocytes, that is, around −20/−42 mV [185,194], due to syalil moieties that are present. Similar to liposomes, the disturbance of the order of acyl tails in lipids can be measured. This was shown to be reversible up to 50° [195]. Therefore, a suspension could be characterized using techniques such as DLS, SAXS, SANS, freeze-fracture/liquid cell TEM, 1D-NMR, Fourier-transformed IR and Raman spectroscopies. It should be pointed out that the biconcave shape is still retained in nano-erythrosomes when extrusion is avoided [186,194]. Such an irregular shape could be advantageous as a DDS for endosomal escape [155]. As for parental erythrocytes, such a phenomenon is probably due to the Canham-Helfrich effect [196,197]. Moreover, at the phase-transition temperature for membrane lipids (50 °C), they exhibit a reversible but remarkable polygonal arrangement of spectrin-actin-ankyrin scaffold upon dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) doping [186], usually found in clathrin-coated vesicles. Furthermore, as colloidal matter, they are not prone to coalescence due to electrostatic repulsion and behave in a suspension as nearly undistinguishable from uni-lamellar vesicles such as coated of PEG2000 [193,194]. The composition of nano-erythrosomes, in terms of lipids and integral membrane proteins, is superimposable on that of erythrocyte extracellular vesicles (exosomes and micro-vesicles altogether) [198,199], while the latter lack external cytoskeleton, being originated by events of vesiculation [200]. We can speculate that most of the effects studied for EV and applications are also adaptable, at least avoiding mechano-elastic implication, to nano-erythrosomes.

4.3.1. Nano-Erythrosomes: Clearance and Endocytic/Phagocytic Pathways

Nano-erythrosomes, while retaining erythrocyte stealth, biocompatible, atoxic, and efficient carrier properties, have the advantages of a liposomes-sized particle. Traditionally, according to the ADME rules, the tentative resolution of the “distribution” rate problem has focused on RES macrophages residing in the liver, bone marrow and lymph nodes, and hepatic clearance (by Kupffer cells). Conversely, a recent pharmacological problem is that of spleen clearance [202,203]. In normal conditions and no surface-functionalization, erythrocyte-sized nanoparticles are cleared by the spleen in the red pulp. Being a highly perfused organ (170 mL/min/100 g), and composed by the endothelial cells, having little or no capacity of storage, the impact of a nanoparticle on the spleen is basically on the white pulp, colonized mainly by B lymphocytes and marginal-zone macrophages. It was determined [202] that size has a dramatic influence on the fate of a nanoparticle in the human body. However, for entities like liposomes or colloidal nanoparticles of 100–200 nm, the main fate after intravenous delivery is the uptake from splenic macrophages in the white pulp. For larger hydrodynamic radii (up to 400 nm) the filtration is mainly on the red pulp and it accounts, in a few hours, to nearly the whole of the administered dose [153]. The lesser known system of Scavenger Endothelial Cells (SEC) [204], mainly residing in the liver sinusoids, competes with RES for the nanoparticles’ uptake. Nanoparticle clearance from the bloodstream is clathrin-mediated, not phagocytic, for 70-nm silica nanoparticles, while no data are available about liposome-like objects [205]. Therefore, size-reduction processes such as extrusion and sonication also delay the clearance of the DDS from the blood. An optimal size, to avoid opsonization and immune-system recognition in blood and tissues [206], albumin, or HDL/LDL deposition in blood [153,207], IgM binding [208] and to minimize splenic, hepatic, and renal clearance [43,206], would be 100–200 nm. It should be recalled that the term reticuloendothelial system (RES) refers to a various and scattered population of phagocytic cells of the liver, bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen, brain microglia, and each population and phenotype has a different optimum nanoparticle uptake [38]. MPS (mononuclear phagocytic system) is a broader definition for phagocytic/endocytic cells, also residing in blood and tissues [209], which help clearance organ RES to get rid of the nanoparticles (Figure 3).
Uptake by phagocytic cells, composing MPS and RES, could be also avoided or at least reduced, for nano-erythrosomes, by the lack of formation of the so-called “biocorona”. This was discovered and studied by the Vroman group in the 1960s [210,211] (Figure 3). The complement protein, apo-lipoproteins, opsonins, albumin, thus not masking the presence of CD47 and TER119 and, most importantly, subsequently eliminating the need for PEGylation, chitosan, pluronic [49] or dextran coating, that is, branched polymers known to elicit several immune responses [43,212]. Moreover, while the fenestrations of normal arteries range from 5 to 100 nm in diameter [203], in the case of defective blood vessels in cancer tissue [213], known to be leaky, the pores can reach 2 µm. This leads to the EPR effect [27], exploited in cases of liposome-based formulations in passive tumor targeting. The natural origin of nano-erythrosomes, and, therefore, the lack of biocorona formation, will help reduce the total clearance. It was determined by the Maeda group in 1986 that protein and polymer complexes are more efficiently accumulated in tumors and that liver and spleen clearances are dramatically lower [214]. In any case, RES phagocytosis could also be desirable sometimes, such as in HIV-infected macrophages [106,215]. Internalization and degradation processes can be accelerated by irreversible clustering of band-3 protein via a zinc chloride treatment [216], causing IgG opsonization, that can be extended to nano-erythrosomes. It has yet to be determined whether nano-erythrosomes retain CR1 (complement receptor 1) as parental erythrocytes, a complement complex receptor known to cause, upon recognition of opsonized particles, a conformational change in surrounding lipid double layer. If this is the case, how this will affect nano-erythrosomes behavior in vivo [78].
In the case of NA loading, that is, as gene-therapy agents, the delivery of the cargo must be cytoplasmatic. Miniaturization could also improve the endocytosis and internalization. Liposomes are usually internalized by a cell via endosomes, phagocytized, or fused with an outer bilayer, releasing the cargo within the cytoplasm [217]. The pH resistance of nano-erythrosomes is also unknown. Thus, so is their ability to release the payload when in contact with endosomal acidic pH. Due to the similar size, it can be assumed that nano-erythrosomes too, despite the stiffness of the membrane due to the presence of cholesterol, can take advantage of similar pathways. So far, even if in presence of precise hints on the internalization of nanoerythrosomes by cancer cells and endothelial cells [192,218], the mechanism is still unclear.
Therefore, while nano-erythrosomes show features belonging to both erythrocytes and liposomes, they have not been used for transfection or gene therapy.

4.3.2. Tissue Penetration of Nano-Erythrosomes in Solid Tumors and Active Targeting

A commonly neglected problem for the in-vivo application of liposomes is their tissue penetration, that is, the ability to reach deep tumor regions, far from main blood vessels. A nanoparticle, to exert its payload release activity, has to cross several barriers: (1) to reach the tumoral blood vessels; (2) to extravasate from them, and pass through epithelia; (3) to survive the journey inside the extracellular matrix and the stroma and come into contact with tumor cells; (4) to make it to every region of tumor tissue, via intercellular or interstitial transport and, finally, to release its payload [219]. Solid tumor cells are usually far from blood vessels, the latter being compressed and less efficient for nutrient and oxygen transportation [220]. Therefore, anaerobiosis and autophagy are efficient tumoral markers [221]. A huge challenge in nanomedicine for gene-therapy applications is to reach the stem tumoral cells, even more fundamental than being internalized by the cells. The activity of therapeutic NAs is independent of the cell cycle stage (often crucial for traditional chemotherapy), the limiting step is the diffusion and drug release by carriers [222], hampered by the dense extracellular matrix that the tumor cells are surrounded by. The microfluidic of the neoplastic blood vessels is also distorted by the high pressure exerted by abnormal cells and the lack of lymph drainage. No coherent model for liposomal nanoparticle behavior in such vessels has been developed [223], although there have been some attempts to find a route to better tumor penetration [224]. A bio-mimetic DDS, such as nano-erythrosomes, can better dissolve within the collagen extracellular matrix, due to being partly protein composed [214]. The presence of metalloproteinases in the ECM of some solid tumors [225] can also improve the drug release from nano-erythrosomes, degrading the membrane proteins and disrupting the membrane structure.
Active targeting can also improve tissue penetration, as it is a common technique in DDS design [226,227]. The erythrocyte surface has been decorated with multiple agents, for example, via biotin-avidin coupling, lipid fusion, amino acid binding [97,228,229]. A similar approach was used to conjugate RBC-derived membranes, when used as a cloaking agent for nanoparticles, with antibodies [230]. Antibody conjugation has also been exploited for nano-erythrosomes. While loaded with indocyanine green for near-infrared fluorescence imaging, they are conjugated with anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth receptor) antibodies via DSPE-PEG-NH2 (2000 Da in molecular weight), to achieve better in vivo imaging properties [192]; also, they have been functionalized with ephrin-B1 ligand receptor, to actively target human dermal microvascular endothelial cells [218].

4.4. Possible Bottleneck: The Encapsulation Efficiency of NAs

There are only a few examples of NA-encapsulated erythrocytes (or derived objects). Such a process poses challenges. The main aim of encapsulation is to protect the NAs from the body, which, in the case of contact with the naked, double-stranded RNA, reacts violently by activating interferone-tyrosin-kinases cascade [4]. The second aim is to deliver the cargo directly into the recipient cell, via a fusogenic or endocytic pathway. That has to be elicited somehow, and the effectiveness of this step determinates the transfection efficiency. Antisense oligonucleotides, where approved, such as Eteplirsen against Duchenne muscular atrophy (an only FDA, not EMA, approved orphan drug) have to be modified to avoid cleavage by nucleases, in the form of phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer [231], or, as Prexigebersen (phase II, NCT02781883), have to be microencapsulated. In RNA-interference-based therapy, the reaction against dsRNA can be avoided by administering a DNA strand codifying for the relative short-hairpin RNA [232]. In a drug’s scaling-up process, the first challenge is the efficiency of encapsulation of the drug inside the carrier. Such a process is regulated by the loading method, charge, carrier size, state of aggregation of the drug, and the lipid composition if dealing with liposomes [233,234]. While for weakly alkaline drugs the remote loading (and entrapping) technique based on the transmembrane ammonium sulphate gradient can be used, the same cannot be applied to NAs [235]. In other words, there are no chemical routes to follow to enrich and entrap a NA, unmodified, in a carrier. The negative charge of NAs has been used with the development of cationic liposomes for gene therapy. For example, SGT-53 (NCT02340156) is a regular p53 (a famous oncosuppressor gene) cDNA, entrapped in a DOTAP/DOPE liposome decorated with a targeting antibody. In such structures, the NA is condensed with a lipidic core, in lipoplexes [179]. Otherwise, a solid lipid nanoparticle (not hollow) has been developed to bind NAs, thus controlling their release kinetics: EnCore, currently used to entrap MYC oncogene ASO [236].
Nano-erythrosomes and parental erythrocytes show a negative surface charge, due to the sialic acid moieties. Theoretically, this will impair the encapsulation efficiency of the NAs. Therefore, a possible solution could be the use of DNA block copolymers, neutralizing the NA’s negative charge by complexing the DNA with an hydrophobic polymeric core [237]. Conversely, the use of “helper lipids”, developed for cationic nanoparticles, could improve the transfection efficiency for nano-erythrosomes, customizing the chemical composition according to the target tissues [238]. The lipid-fusion-loading technique can be used to load erythrocytes and nano-erythrosomes with NAs.
The negative charge of NAs leads them towards cationic residues such as lysine and arginine, as shown by their adsorption in L-lysin dendrimers [239,240]. The extent of such binding, if somehow sterically impaired by the presence of the glycocalyx, is unknown. mRNA is, however, known, in some exceptional cases, to insert permanently into DOPC double layers [241,242], Such studies have never been carried out for homologous in sequence DNA. Therefore, a mix of electrostatic repulsion between the surface sialic acid moieties and the NA, the adsorption in the glycocalyx forest, the interaction with surface proteins, and, lastly, the eventual insertion of the RNA in the double layer, will hamper the loading efficiency of erythrocytes and nano-erythrosomes. Therefore, an accurate selection based on molecular charge and overall hydrophobicity surface must be carried out for a NA if it is to be loaded into RBCs, while a nuclease enzymatic treatment could show the binding localization on the outer surface.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspective

Erythrocytes have long been used as DDSs, but only recently began to attract attention outside the academic community. This is thanks to the approval of some erythrocyte-based technologies such as the proposals of Erydel and Erytech, while GRASPA (L-asparaginase encapsulated in RBCs) did not make it to the end of the trial-II process. Erythrocytes could provide, without any further modification, everything a DDS needs: stealth ability to deceive the immune system, protection against proteases and nucleases present in the blood, a long half-life in the latter, leading to longer therapeutic effects. They are easy to collect and administering the patient with self-erythrocytes loaded with the drug could avoid any allergic reaction. Among the drawbacks, there is the not-fully-characterized rheology of the membrane, in terms of shape, porosity, permeability, and supramolecular behavior, from a pharmacokinetic point of view, especially when trying to use erythrocytes as carriers for NA-based drugs. The latter are currently a topic in pharmacology, due to the discovery of RNA interference and the recent advancements in gene therapy. Only a few examples could be counted for the applications of erythrocytes for the previously mentioned molecules, while the whole topic, also thanks to the development of Sars-Cov-2 mRNA vaccines, continues to thrive. The recent “nano revolution” in pharmacology has reached the declining field of erythrocyte research too: extracellular vesicles, with sizes ranging around 100–200 nm, also from erythrocytes, have begun to be a subject of interest. Furthermore, in the late 1990s, nano-erythrosomes were developed from the sonication and extrusion of RBC ghosts. They retain the stealth abilities of erythrocytes, but their reduced size allows them to circumvent clearance issues, while permitting a widespread distribution of the loaded drug. All the knowledge acquired along decades about erythrocyte membrane and cytoskeletal proteins could also be applied to them. While they have been fully characterized from a colloidal matter point of view, biological data about the interaction with tissues, cell fusion or phagocytosis, eventual endosomal escape, and, finally, stability when drug-loaded, are still lacking. They could be an interesting platform to develop new-generation NA-based drugs that are stealthy and autologous.

Author Contributions

G.D.P. draft preparation and revision, N.K. revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency ARRS (project numbers P2-0084 and PR-10482).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

DDSdrug delivery system
RBCred blood cell
RBCMred-blood-cell membrane
Hbhemoglobin
NPnanoparticle
NAnucleic acid
EVextracellular vesicle
SNAREsoluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor
PAApoly-acryl-amide
ROSreactive oxygen species
DOTAPN-[1-(2,3-Dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium methyl-sulphate
DOPEdioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine
RESReticulo-endothelial system
MPSMononuclear phagocyte system
SECScavenger endothelial cell
ASOantisense oligo-nucleotides
PGLApoly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)
ECMextracellular matrix

References

  1. Wagner, T.E.; Becraft, J.R.; Bodner, K.; Teague, B.; Zhang, X.; Woo, A.; Porter, E.; Alburquerque, B.; Dobosh, B.; Andries, O.; et al. Small-molecule-based regulation of RNA-delivered circuits in mammalian cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kaczmarek, J.C.; Kowalski, P.S.; Anderson, D.G. Advances in the delivery of RNA therapeutics: From concept to clinical reality. Genome Med. 2017, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Zukancic, D.; Suys, E.J.A.; Pilkington, E.H.; Algarni, A.; Al-Wassiti, H.; Truong, N.P. The importance of poly(Ethylene glycol) and lipid structure in targeted gene delivery to lymph nodes by lipid nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gantier, M.P.; Williams, B.R.G. The response of mammalian cells to double-stranded RNA. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2007, 18, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Byun, H.M.; Suh, D.; Yoon, H.; Kim, J.M.; Choi, H.G.; Kim, W.K.; Ko, J.J.; Oh, Y.K. Erythrocyte ghost-mediated gene delivery for prolonged and blood-targeted expression. Gene Ther. 2004, 11, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Wei, G.; Huang, Y.; Yu, H.; Gan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mei, L.; et al. Recent progress in drug delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 9, 1145–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ryu, J.H.; Lee, S.; Son, S.; Kim, S.H.; Leary, J.F.; Choi, K.; Kwon, I.C. Theranostic nanoparticles for future personalized medicine. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thorat, N.D.; Townley, H.E.; Patil, R.M.; Tofail, S.A.M.; Bauer, J. Comprehensive approach of hybrid nanoplatforms in drug delivery and theranostics to combat cancer. Drug Discov. Today 2020, 25, 1245–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kostevšek, N.; Cheung, C.C.L.L.; Serša, I.; Kreft, M.E.; Monaco, I.; Franchini, M.C.; Vidmar, J.; Al-Jamal, W.T.; Comes Franchini, M.; Vidmar, J.; et al. Magneto-liposomes as MRI contrast agents: A systematic study of different liposomal formulations. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, Z.; Thayumanavan, S. Noncationic Material Design for Nucleic Acid Delivery. Adv. Ther. 2020, 3, 1900206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ho, L.W.C.; Liu, Y.; Han, R.; Bai, Q.; Choi, C.H.J. Nano-Cell Interactions of Non-Cationic Bionanomaterials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Phua, K.K.L.; Nair, S.K.; Leong, K.W. Messenger RNA (mRNA) nanoparticle tumour vaccination. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7715–7729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Phua, K.K.L.; Boczkowski, D.; Dannull, J.; Pruitt, S.; Leong, K.W.; Nair, S.K. Whole Blood Cells Loaded with Messenger RNA as an Anti-Tumor Vaccine. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2014, 3, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Gelvin, E.P.; McGavack, T.H.; Kenigsberg, S. The anorexigenic effect of sustained-release dexedrine preparations. Am. J. Dig. Dis. 1953, 20, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Langer, R.; Folkman, J. Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules. Nature 1976, 263, 797–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, K. Controlled drug delivery systems: Past forward and future back. J. Control. Release 2014, 190, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Brooke, D.; Washkuhn, R.J. Zero-order drug delivery system: Theory and preliminary testing. J. Pharm. Sci. 1977, 66, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Langer, R.S.; Peppas, N.A. Present and future applications of biomaterials in controlled drug delivery systems. Biomaterials 1981, 2, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lipper, R.A.; Higuchi, W.I. Analysis of Theoretical Behavior of a Proposed Zero-Order Drug Delivery System. J. Pharm. Sci. 1977, 66, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Park, K. Drug delivery of the future: Chasing the invisible gorilla. J. Control. Release 2016, 240, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Reza Rezaie, H.; Esnaashary, M.; Aref arjmand, A.; Öchsner, A.; Rezaie, H.R.; Esnaashary, M. A Review of Biomaterials and Their Applications in Drug Delivery; SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018; pp. 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hoffman, A.S. The origins and evolution of “controlled” drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2008, 132, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, D.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Ji, H.; Peng, R.; Jin, L.; Wu, W. Advances in refunctionalization of erythrocyte-based nanomedicine for enhancing cancer-targeted drug delivery. Theranostics 2019, 9, 6885–6900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schein, C.H. Repurposing approved drugs on the pathway to novel therapies. Med. Res. Rev. 2020, 40, 586–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mittal, N.; Garg, V.; Bhadada, S.K.; Katare, O.P. Role of novel drug delivery systems in coronavirus disease-2019 (covid-19): Time to act now. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zylberberg, C.; Matosevic, S. Pharmaceutical liposomal drug delivery: A review of new delivery systems and a look at the regulatory landscape. Drug Deliv. 2016, 23, 3319–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Maeda, H. Tumor-selective delivery of macromolecular drugs via the EPR effect: Background and future prospects. Bioconjug. Chem. 2010, 21, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barenholz, Y. Doxil® The first FDA-approved nano-drug: Lessons learned. J. Control. Release 2012, 160, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Danhier, F. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine? J. Control. Release 2016, 244, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ventola, C.L. Progress in nanomedicine: Approved and investigational nanodrugs. Pharm. Ther. 2017, 42, 742–755. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, H. Onivyde for the therapy of multiple solid tumors. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2016, 9, 3001–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ferrari, R.; Sponchioni, M.; Morbidelli, M.; Moscatelli, D. Polymer nanoparticles for the intravenous delivery of anticancer drugs: The checkpoints on the road from the synthesis to clinical translation. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 22701–22719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mazzotta, E.; Tavano, L.; Muzzalupo, R. Thermo-sensitive vesicles in controlled drug delivery for chemotherapy. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Goldberg, M.; Langer, R.; Jia, X. Nanostructured materials for applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2007, 18, 241–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Beltrán-Gracia, E.; López-Camacho, A.; Higuera-Ciapara, I.; Velázquez-Fernández, J.B.; Vallejo-Cardona, A.A. Nanomedicine review: Clinical developments in liposomal applications. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Edgar, J.Y.C.; Wang, H. Introduction for Design of Nanoparticle Based Drug Delivery Systems. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 23, 2108–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sushnitha, M.; Evangelopoulos, M.; Tasciotti, E.; Taraballi, F. Cell Membrane-Based Biomimetic Nanoparticles and the Immune System: Immunomodulatory Interactions to Therapeutic Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gustafson, H.H.; Holt-Casper, D.; Grainger, D.W.; Ghandehari, H. Nanoparticle uptake: The phagocyte problem. Nano Today 2015, 10, 487–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Turecek, P.L.; Bossard, M.J.; Schoetens, F.; Ivens, I.A. PEGylation of Biopharmaceuticals: A Review of Chemistry and Nonclinical Safety Information of Approved Drugs. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 460–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lubich, C.; Allacher, P.; de la Rosa, M.; Bauer, A.; Prenninger, T.; Horling, F.M.; Siekmann, J.; Oldenburg, J.; Scheiflinger, F.; Reipert, B.M. The Mystery of Antibodies Against Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) What do we Know? Pharm. Res. 2016, 33, 2239–2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Judge, A.; McClintock, K.; Phelps, J.R.; MacLachlan, I. Hypersensitivity and loss of disease site targeting caused by antibody responses to PEGylated liposomes. Mol. Ther. 2006, 13, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Judge, A.D.; Sood, V.; Shaw, J.R.; Fang, D.; McClintock, K.; MacLachlan, I. Sequence-dependent stimulation of the mammalian innate immune response by synthetic siRNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 457–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mohamed, M.; Abu Lila, A.S.; Shimizu, T.; Alaaeldin, E.; Hussein, A.; Sarhan, H.A.; Szebeni, J.; Ishida, T. PEGylated liposomes: Immunological responses. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 710–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, P.; Sun, F.; Liu, S.; Jiang, S. Anti-PEG antibodies in the clinic: Current issues and beyond PEGylation. J. Control. Release 2016, 244, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lee, S.C.; Parthasarathy, R.; Duffin, T.D.; Botwin, K.; Zobel, J.; Beck, T.; Lange, G.; Kunneman, D.; Janssen, R.; Rowold, E.; et al. Recognition properties of antibodies to PAMAM dendrimers and their use in immune detection of dendrimers. Biomed. Microdevices 2001, 3, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Qin, X.; Li, T.; Qiu, J.; Yin, T.; Huang, J.; McGinty, S.; Pontrelli, G.; Ren, J.; et al. Biomimetic Nanotherapies: Red Blood Cell Based Core–Shell Structured Nanocomplexes for Atherosclerosis Management. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nel, A.E.; Mädler, L.; Velegol, D.; Xia, T.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Somasundaran, P.; Klaessig, F.; Castranova, V.; Thompson, M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Albanese, A.; Tang, P.S.; Chan, W.C.W. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Pitto-Barry, A.; Barry, N.P.E. Pluronic® block-copolymers in medicine: From chemical and biological versatility to rationalisation and clinical advances. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3291–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Li, L.; Yang, Q.; Shi, L.; Zheng, N.; Li, Z.; Li, K.; Qiao, S.; Jia, T.; Sun, T.; Wang, Y. Novel phthalocyanine-based polymeric micelles with high near-infrared photothermal conversion efficiency under 808 nm laser irradiation for: In vivo cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2247–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, W.; Park, K. Biomimetic Polymers for In Vivo Drug Delivery. Bioinspired Biomim. Polym. Syst. Drug Gene Deliv. 2015, 109–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cun, D.; Jensen, D.K.; Maltesen, M.J.; Bunker, M.; Whiteside, P.; Scurr, D.; Foged, C.; Nielsen, H.M. High loading efficiency and sustained release of siRNA encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles: Quality by design optimization and characterization. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2011, 77, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Shah, R.B.; Schwendeman, S.P. A biomimetic approach to active self-microencapsulation of proteins in PLGA. J. Control. Release 2014, 196, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hamidi, M.; Zarrin, A.; Foroozesh, M.; Mohammadi-Samani, S. Applications of carrier erythrocytes in delivery of biopharmaceuticals. J. Control. Release 2007, 118, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pasini, E.M.; Kirkegaard, M.; Mortensen, P.; Lutz, H.U.; Thomas, A.W.; Mann, M. In-depth analysis of the membrane and cytosolic proteome of red blood cells. Blood 2006, 108, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hochmuth, R.M.; Mohandas, N.; Blackshear, P.L. Measurement of the Elastic Modulus for Red Cell Membrane Using a Fluid Mechanical Technique. Biophys. J. 1973, 13, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Shevkoplyas, S.S.; Yoshida, T.; Gifford, S.C.; Bitensky, M.W. Direct measurement of the impact of impaired erythrocyte deformability on microvascular network perfusion in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 2006, 6, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chabanel, A.; Flamm, M.; Sung, K.L.P.; Lee, M.M.; Schachter, D.; Chien, S. Influence of cholesterol content on red cell membrane viscoelasticity and fluidity. Biophys. J. 1983, 44, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Hainfeld, J.F.; Steck, T.L. The sub-membrane reticulum of the human erythrocyte: A scanning electron microscope study. J. Supramol. Cell. Biochem. 1977, 6, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Byers, T.J.; Branton, D. Visualization of the protein associations in the erythrocyte membrane skeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1985, 82, 6153–6157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Li, H.; Lykotrafitis, G. Erythrocyte membrane model with explicit description of the lipid bilayer and the spectrin network. Biophys. J. 2014, 107, 642–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Payliss, B.J.; Hassanin, M.; Prenner, E.J. The structural and functional effects of Hg(II) and Cd(II) on lipid model systems and human erythrocytes: A review. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2015, 193, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. De Oliveira, S.; Saldanha, C. An overview about erythrocyte membrane. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2010, 44, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Burnier, L.; Fontana, P.; Kwak, B.R.; Anne, A.S. Cell-derived microparticles in haemostasis and vascular medicine. Thromb. Haemost. 2009, 101, 439–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Daleke, D.L. Regulation of phospholipid asymmetry in the erythrocyte membrane. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2008, 15, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Usman, W.M.; Pham, T.C.; Kwok, Y.Y.; Vu, L.T.; Ma, V.; Peng, B.; Chan, Y.S.; Wei, L.; Chin, S.M.; Azad, A.; et al. Efficient RNA drug delivery using red blood cell extracellular vesicles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kuo, W.P.; Tigges, J.C.; Toxavidis, V.; Ghiran, I. Red Blood Cells: A Source of Extracellular Vesicles. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1660, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  68. Van Wijk, R.; Van Solinge, W.W. The energy-less red blood cell is lost: Erythrocyte enzyme abnormalities of glycolysis. Blood 2005, 106, 4034–4042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Minakami, S.; Suzuki, C.; Saito, T.; Yoshikawa, H. Studies on erythrocyte glycolysis I. determination of the glycolytic intermediates in human erythrocytes. J. Biochem. 1965, 58, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Borghi, N.; Brochard-Wyart, F. Tether extrusion from red blood cells: Integral proteins unbinding from cytoskeleton. Biophys. J. 2007, 93, 1369–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Hochmuth, R.M.; Marcus, W.D. Membrane tethers formed from blood cells with available area and determination of their adhesion energy. Biophys. J. 2002, 82, 2964–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ciana, A.; Achilli, C.; Minetti, G. Membrane rafts of the human red blood cell. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2014, 31, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Reinhart, W.H.; Chien, S. Red cell rheology in stomatocyte-echinocyte transformation: Roles of cell geometry and cell shape. Blood 1986, 67, 1110–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hoffman, J.F. Evidence that asymmetry of the membrane/cytoskeletal complex in human red blood cell ghosts is responsible for their biconcave shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 1641–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. D’Alessandro, A.; Righetti, P.G.; Zolla, L. The red blood cell proteome and interactome: An update. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 144–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bryk, A.H.; Wiśniewski, J.R. Quantitative Analysis of Human Red Blood Cell Proteome. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 2752–2761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Bruschi, M.; Seppi, C.; Arena, S.; Musante, L.; Santucci, L.; Balduini, C.; Scaloni, A.; Lanciotti, M.; Righetti, P.G.; Candiano, G. Proteomic analysis of erythrocyte membranes by soft immobiline gels combined with differential protein extraction. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 1304–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. de Back, D.Z.; Kostova, E.B.; van Kraaij, M.; van den Berg, T.K.; van Bruggen, R. Of macrophages and red blood cells; A complex love story. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Anderson, H.L.; Brodsky, I.E.; Mangalmurti, N.S. The Evolving Erythrocyte: Red Blood Cells as Modulators of Innate Immunity. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 1343–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Morera, D.; MacKenzie, S.A. Is there a direct role for erythrocytes in the immune response? Vet. Res. 2011, 42, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Weisel, J.W.; Litvinov, R.I. Red blood cells: The forgotten player in hemostasis and thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2019, 17, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Whelihan, M.F.; Zachary, V.; Orfeo, T.; Mann, K.G. Prothrombin activation in blood coagulation: The erythrocyte contribution to thrombin generation. Blood 2012, 120, 3837–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Oldenborg, P.A.; Zheleznyak, A.; Fang, Y.F.; Lagenaur, C.F.; Gresham, H.D.; Lindberg, F.P. Role of CD47 as a marker of self on red blood cells. Science 2000, 288, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hatherley, D.; Graham, S.C.; Turner, J.; Harlos, K.; Stuart, D.I.; Barclay, A.N. Paired Receptor Specificity Explained by Structures of Signal Regulatory Proteins Alone and Complexed with CD47. Mol. Cell 2008, 31, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sun, X.; Funk, C.D.; Deng, C.; Sahu, A.; Lambris, J.D.; Song, W.C. Role of decay-accelerating factor in regulating complement activation on the erythrocyte surface as revealed by gene targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Kay, M.M.B. Localization of senescent cell antigen on band 3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 5753–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Marshall, P.; Hasegawa, A.; Davidson, E.A.; Nussenzweig, V.; Whitlow, M. Interaction between complement proteins C5b-7 and erythrocyte membrane sialic acid. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 184, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Arakawa, T.; Kobayashi-Yurugi, T.; Alguel, Y.; Iwanari, H.; Hatae, H.; Iwata, M.; Abe, Y.; Hino, T.; Ikeda-Suno, C.; Kuma, H.; et al. Crystal structure of the anion exchanger domain of human erythrocyte band 3. Science 2015, 350, 680–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Rossi, L.; Fraternale, A.; Bianchi, M.; Magnani, M.; Minetti, G.; Palis, J.; Magnani, M.; Rossi, L.; Fraternale, A.; Bianchi, M. Red Blood Cell Membrane Processing for Biomedical Applications. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Talhouarne, G.J.S.; Gall, J.G. 7SL RNA in vertebrate red blood cells. RNA 2018, 24, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kleinbongard, P.; Schulz, R.; Rassaf, T.; Lauer, T.; Dejam, A.; Jax, T.; Kumara, I.; Gharini, P.; Kabanova, S.; Özüyaman, B.; et al. Red blood cells express a functional endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Blood 2006, 107, 2943–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Kabanova, S.; Kleinbongard, P.; Volkmer, J.; Andrée, B.; Kelm, M.; Jax, T.W. Gene expression analysis of human red blood cells. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2009, 6, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Moenner, M.; Vosoghi, M.; Ryazantsev, S.; Glitz, D.G. Ribonuclease inhibitor protein of human erythrocytes: Characterization, loss of activity in response to oxidative stress, and association with Heinz bodies. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 1998, 24, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ihler, G.M.; Glew, R.H.; Schnure, F.W. Enzyme loading of erythrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70, 2663–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hoffman, J.F. Physiological Characteristics of Human Red Blood Cell Ghosts. J. Gen. Physiol. 1958, 42, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Lewis, D.A.; Alpar, H.O. Therapeutic possibilities of drugs encapsulated in erythrocytes. Int. J. Pharm. 1984, 22, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Muzykantov, V.R. Drug delivery by red blood cells: Vascular carriers designed by mother nature. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2010, 7, 403–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Koleva, L.; Bovt, E.; Ataullakhanov, F.; Sinauridze, E. Erythrocytes as Carriers: From Drug Delivery to Biosensors. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Xia, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Hou, X.; Feng, N. Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles: A novel drug delivery system for antitumor application. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 9, 675–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Larson, G.; Pieterse, A.; Quick, G.; Van Der Bijl, P.; Van Zyl, J.; Hawtrey, A. Development of a reproducible procedure for plasmid DNA encapsulation by red blood cell ghosts. BioDrugs 2004, 18, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wiberg, F.C.; Sunnerhagen, P.; Kaltoft, K.; Zeuthen, J.; Bjursell, G. Replication and expression in mammalian cells of tramfected DNA; description of an improved erythrocyte ghost fusion technique. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983, 11, 7287–7302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Kim, S.-H.H.; Kim, E.-J.J.; Hou, J.-H.H.; Kim, J.-M.M.; Choi, H.-G.G.; Shim, C.-K.K.; Oh, Y.-K.K. Opsonized erythrocyte ghosts for liver-targeted delivery of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kaltoft, K.; Zeuthen, J.; Engbaek, F.; Piper, P.W.; Celis, J.E. Transfer of tRNAs to somatic cells mediated by Sendai-virus-induced fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73, 2793–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Auer, D.; Brandner, G. Loading of Human Red Blood Cells with DNA and RNA. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 1976, 31, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chiarantini, L.; Cerasi, A.; Fraternale, A.; Andreoni, F.; Scarí, S.; Giovine, M.; Clavarino, E.; Magnani, M. Inhibition of macrophage iNOS by selective targeting of antisense PNA. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 8471–8477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Fraternale, A.; Paoletti, M.F.; Casabianca, A.; Orlandi, C.; Millo, E.; Balestra, E.; Damonte, G.; Perno, C.F.; Magnani, M. Erythrocytes as carriers of antisense PNA addressed against HIV-1 gag-pol transframe domain. J. Drug Target. 2009, 17, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Seeman, P. Transient holes in the erythrocyte membrane during hypotonic hemolysis and stable holes in the membrane after lysis by saponin and lysolecithin. J. Cell Biol. 1967, 32, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gothoskar, A.V. Resealed Erythrocytes: A Review. Pharm. Technol. 2004, 28, 140–154. [Google Scholar]
  109. Tajerzadeh, H.; Hamidi, M. Evaluation of hypotonic preswelling method for encapsulation of enalaprilat in intact human erythrocytes. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000, 26, 1247–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Steck, T.L. Preparation of Impermeable Inside-Out and Right-Side-Out Vesicles from Erythrocyte Membranes. In Methods in Membrane Biology; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 1974; Volume 255, pp. 245–281. [Google Scholar]
  111. Arias, M.; Quijano, J.C.; Haridas, V.; Gutterman, J.U.; Lemeshko, V.V. Red blood cell permeabilization by hypotonic treatments, saponin, and anticancer avicins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2010, 1798, 1189–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Cheng, Z.; Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Raza, F.; Li, Y.; Yuan, W.; Qiu, M.; Su, J. Autologous erythrocytes delivery of berberine hydrochloride with long-acting effect for hypolipidemia treatment. Drug Deliv. 2020, 27, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Nomme, J.; Su, Y.; Lavie, A. Elucidation of the Specific Function of the Conserved Threonine Triad Responsible for Human l-Asparaginase Autocleavage and Substrate Hydrolysis. J. Mol. Biol. 2014, 426, 2471–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Timofeev, V.; Abramchik, Y.; Zhukhlistova, N.; Muravieva, T.; Fateev, I.; Esipov, R.; Kuranova, I. 3′-Azidothymidine in the active site of Escherichia coli thymidine phosphorylase: The peculiarity of the binding on the basis of X-ray study. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2014, 70, 1155–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mambrini, G.; Mandolini, M.; Rossi, L.; Pierigè, F.; Capogrossi, G.; Salvati, P.; Serafini, S.; Benatti, L.; Magnani, M. Ex vivo encapsulation of dexamethasone sodium phosphate into human autologous erythrocytes using fully automated biomedical equipment. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 517, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rossi, L.; Pierigè, F.; Aliano, M.P.; Magnani, M. Ongoing Developments and Clinical Progress in Drug-Loaded Red Blood Cell Technologies. BioDrugs 2020, 34, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Villa, C.H.; Seghatchian, J.; Muzykantov, V. Drug delivery by erythrocytes: “Primum non nocere”. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2016, 55, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Bourgeaux, V.; Lanao, J.; Bax, B.; Godfrin, Y. Drug-loaded erythrocytes: On the road toward marketing approval. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2016, 10, 665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Gutiérrez Millán, C.; Castañeda, A.Z.; Sayalero Marinero, M.L.; Lanao, J.M. Factors associated with the performance of carrier erythrocytes obtained by hypotonic dialysis. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2004, 33, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Deloach, J.; Ihler, G. A dialysis procedure for loading erythrocytes with enzymes and lipids. BBA Gen. Subj. 1977, 496, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Levene, M.; Bain, M.D.; Moran, N.F.; Nirmalananthan, N.; Poulton, J.; Scarpelli, M.; Filosto, M.; Mandel, H.; Mackinnon, A.D.; Fairbanks, L.; et al. Clinical Medicine Safety and Efficacy of Erythrocyte Encapsulated Thymidine Phosphorylase in Mitochondrial Neurogastrointestinal Encephalomyopathy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Godfrin, Y.; Horand, F.; Franco, R.; Dufour, E.; Kosenko, E.; Bax, B.E.; Banz, A.; Skorokhod, O.A.; Lanao, J.M.; Vitvitsky, V.; et al. International seminar on the red blood cells as vehicles for drugs. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2012, 12, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Gay, F.; Aguera, K.; Sénéchal, K.; Tainturier, A.; Berlier, W.; Maucort-Boulch, D.; Honnorat, J.; Horand, F.; Godfrin, Y.; Bourgeaux, V. Methionine tumor starvation by erythrocyte-encapsulated methionine gamma-lyase activity controlled with per os vitamin B6. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 1437–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Shi, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, J.; Chen, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yao, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xie, J. A Review on Electroporation-Based Intracellular Delivery. Molecules 2018, 23, 3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Venslauskas, M.S.; Šatkauskas, S. Mechanisms of transfer of bioactive molecules through the cell membrane by electroporation. Eur. Biophys. J. 2015, 44, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Weaver, J.C.; Chizmadzhev, Y.A. Theory of electroporation: A review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1996, 41, 135–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Moroz, V.; Kozlova, E.; Negovsky, V.A. Opposite effects of electroporation of red blood cell membranes under the influence of zinc ions. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2012, 14, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  128. Zimmermann, U.; Pilwat, G.; Riemann, F. Preparation of erythrocyte ghosts by dielectric breakdown of the cell membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1975, 375, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zimmermann, U.; Pilwat, G.; Esser, B.; Zimmermann, U. The Effect of Encapsulation in Red Blood Cells on the Distribution of Methotrexate in Mice. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 1978, 16, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Mitchell, D.; James, G.; Kruse, C. Bioactivity of electric field-pulsed human recombinant interleukin-2 and its encapsulation into erythrocyte carriers. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 1990, 12, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lucas, A.; Lam, D.; Cabrales, P. Drug Delivery Doxorubicin-loaded red blood cells reduced cardiac toxicity and preserved anticancer activity Doxorubicin-loaded red blood cells reduced cardiac toxicity and preserved anticancer activity. Drug Deliv. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Glassman, P.M.; Villa, C.H.; Ukidve, A.; Zhao, Z.; Smith, P.; Mitragotri, S.; Russell, A.J.; Brenner, J.S.; Muzykantov, V.R. Vascular Drug Delivery Using Carrier Red Blood Cells: Focus on RBC Surface Loading and Pharmacokinetics. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Büning, H. Gene therapy enters the pharma market: The short story of a long journey. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Agre, P.; Smith, B.L.; Hartel-Schenk, S. Biochemistry of the Erythrocyte Rh Polypeptides: A Review. Front. Physiol. 1990, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Zhao, Y.; Fan, M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Shao, C.; Jin, B.; Wang, X.; Hui, L.; Wang, S.; Liao, Z.; et al. Surface-anchored framework for generating RhD-epitope stealth red blood cells. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Tan, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Xu, H.; Ji, S.; Li, S.; Gong, F.; Zhang, Y. Decreased immunorejection in unmatched blood transfusions by attachment of methoxypolyethylene glycol on human red blood cells and the effect on D antigen. Transfusion 2006, 46, 2122–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Scott, M.D.; Murad, K.L.; Koumpouras, F.; Talbot, M.; Eaton, J.W. Chemical camouflage of antigenic determinants: Stealth erythrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7566–7571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Armstrong, J.K.; Meiselman, H.J.; Fisher, T.C. Covalent binding of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) to the surface of red blood cells inhibits aggregation and reduces low shear blood viscosity. Am. J. Hematol. 1997, 56, 26–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Winslow, R.M.; Vandegriff, K.D.; Intaglietta, M. Advances in Blood Substitutes: Industrial Opportunities and Medical Challenges. In Advances in Blood Substitutes; Birkhäuser Boston: Boston, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  141. Chen, A.M.; Scott, M.D. Current and future applications of immunological attenuation via pegylation of cells and tissue. BioDrugs 2001, 15, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Murad, K.L.; Mahany, K.L.; Brugnara, C.; Kuypers, F.A.; Eaton, J.W.; Scott, M.D. Structural and functional consequences of antigenic modulation of red blood cells with methoxypoly(ethylene glycol). Blood 1999, 93, 2121–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nacharaju, P.; Boctor, F.N.; Manjula, B.N.; Acharya, S.A. Surface decoration of red blood cells with maleimidophenyl-polyethylene glycol facilitated by thiolation with iminothiolane: An approach to mask A, B, and D antigens to generate universal red blood cells. Transfusion 2005, 45, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Nacharaju, P.; Manjula, B.N.; Acharya, S.A. Thiolation mediated Pegylation platform to generate functional universal red blood cells. Artif. Cells Blood Substit. Biotechnol. 2007, 35, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wang, B.; Wang, G.; Zhao, B.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Tang, R. Antigenically shielded universal red blood cells by polydopamine-based cell surface engineering. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3463–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Chien, S.; Sung, K.L.; Skalak, R.; Usami, S.; Tözeren, A. Theoretical and experimental studies on viscoelastic properties of erythrocyte membrane. Biophys. J. 1978, 24, 463–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Shiga, T.; Maeda, N.; Kon, K. Erythrocyte rheology. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 1990, 10, 9–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Man, Y.; Kucukal, E.; An, R.; Watson, Q.D.; Bosch, J.; Zimmerman, P.A.; Little, J.A.; Gurkan, U.A.; Gurkan, U.A. Microfluidic assessment of red blood cell mediated microvascular occlusion. Lab Chip 2020, 20, 2086–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Tomaiuolo, G.; Barra, M.; Preziosi, V.; Cassinese, A.; Rotoli, B.; Guido, S. Microfluidics analysis of red blood cell membrane viscoelasticity. Lab Chip 2011, 11, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Jindal, A.B. The effect of particle shape on cellular interaction and drug delivery applications of micro- and nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 532, 450–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yang, Y.; Nie, D.; Liu, Y.; Yu, M.; Gan, Y. Advances in particle shape engineering for improved drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Barua, S.; Yoo, J.W.; Kolhar, P.; Wakankar, A.; Gokarn, Y.R.; Mitragotri, S. Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3270–3275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Moghimi, S.M.; Hunter, A.C.; Andresen, T.L. Factors controlling nanoparticle pharmacokinetics: An integrated analysis and perspective. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2012, 52, 481–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Toy, R.; Peiris, P.M.; Ghaghada, K.B.; Karathanasis, E. Shaping cancer nanomedicine: The effect of particle shape on the in vivo journey of nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 2014, 9, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Chu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, C.; Fang, C.Y.; Rehor, I.; Cigler, P.; Chang, H.C.; Lin, G.; Liu, R.; et al. Unambiguous observation of shape effects on cellular fate of nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Bastida-Ruiz, D.; Van Hoesen, K.; Cohen, M. The dark side of cell fusion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Hui, S.W.; Isac, T.; Boni, L.T.; Sen, A. Action of polyethylene glycol on the fusion of human erythrocyte membranes. J. Membr. Biol. 1985, 84, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lentz, B.R.; Biophys, E. PEG as a tool to gain insight into membrane fusion. Eur. Biophys. J. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Chernomordik, L.V.; Sowers, A.E. Evidence that the spectrin network and a nonosmotic force control the fusion product morphology in electrofused erythrocyte ghosts. Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 1026–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Hernández, J.M.; Podbilewicz, B. The hallmarks of cell-cell fusion. Development 2017, 144, 4481–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Foged, C. siRNA Delivery with Lipid-based Systems: Promises and Pitfalls. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Lu, M.; Zhao, X.; Xing, H.; Xun, Z.; Zhu, S.; Lang, L.; Yang, T.; Cai, C.; Wang, D.; Ding, P. Comparison of exosome-mimicking liposomes with conventional liposomes for intracellular delivery of siRNA. Int. J. Pharm. 2018, 550, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. O’Brien, K.; Breyne, K.; Ughetto, S.; Laurent, L.C.; Breakefield, X.O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Johnson, R.M.; Robinson, J. Morphological changes in asymmetric erythrocyte membranes induced by electrolytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1976, 70, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hoffman, J.F.; Discher, D.E.; Narla, M.; Waugh, R.E. Biconcave shape of human red-blood-cell ghosts relies on density differences between the rim and dimple of the ghost’s plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14847–14851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Johnson, R.M.; Taylor, G.; Meyer, D.B. Shape and volume changes in erythrocyte ghosts and spectrin-actin networks. J. Cell Biol. 1980, 86, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Herrmann, A.; Müller, P.; Glaser, R. Shape transformation of erythrocyte ghosts depends on ion concentrations. Biosci. Rep. 1985, 5, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Favretto, M.E.; Cluitmans, J.C.A.; Bosman, G.J.C.G.M.; Brock, R. Human erythrocytes as drug carriers: Loading efficiency and side effects of hypotonic dialysis, chlorpromazine treatment and fusion with liposomes. J. Control. Release 2013, 170, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Furusawa, M.; Nishimura, T.; Yamaizumi, M.; Okada, Y. Injection of foreign substances into single cells by cell fusion. Nature 1974, 249, 449–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Loyter, A.; Zakai, N.; Kulka, R.G. “Ultramicroinjection” of macromolecules or small particles into animal cells. A new technique based on virus-induced cell fusion. J. Cell Biol. 1975, 66, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Tacheva, B.; Paarvanova, B.; Ivanov, I.T.; Tenchov, B.; Georgieva, R.; Karabaliev, M. Drug exchange between albumin nanoparticles and erythrocyte membranes. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Matsumoto, Y.; Ohsako, M. Transport of drugs through human erythrocyte membranes: pH dependence of drug transport through labeled human erythrocytes in the presence of band 3 protein inhibitor. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 81, 428–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Birlouez-Aragon, I.; Scalbert-Menanteau, P.; Morawiec, M.; Shafiezadeh, M. Evidence for a relationship between protein glycation and red blood cell membrane fluidity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990, 170, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Cooper, R.A. Influence of increased membrane cholesterol on membrane fluidity and cell function in human red blood cells. J. Supramol. Cell. Biochem. 1978, 8, 413–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Grunze, M.; Deuticke, B. Changes of membrane permeability due to extensive cholesterol depletion in mammalian erythrocytes. BBA Biomembr. 1974, 356, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhang, H. Erythrocytes in nanomedicine: An optimal blend of natural and synthetic materials. Biomater. Sci. 2016, 4, 1024–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Harisa, G.I.; Badran, M.M.; AlQahtani, S.A.; Alanazi, F.K.; Attia, S.M. Pravastatin chitosan nanogels-loaded erythrocytes as a new delivery strategy for targeting liver cancer. Saudi Pharm. J. 2016, 24, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hamidi, M.; Rafiei, P.; Azadi, A.; Mohammadi-Samani, S. Encapsulation of valproate-loaded hydrogel nanoparticles in intact human erythrocytes: A novel nano-cell composite for drug delivery. J. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 100, 1702–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, W.; Guo, R.; Sun, H.; Chen, X.; Deng, N. Barriers and Strategies of Cationic Liposomes for Cancer Gene Therapy. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2020, 18, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. van Witteloostuijn, S.B.; Pedersen, S.L.; Jensen, K.J. Half-Life Extension of Biopharmaceuticals using Chemical Methods: Alternatives to PEGylation. ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 2474–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Tai, W. Current aspects of siRNA bioconjugate for in vitro and in vivo delivery. Molecules 2019, 24, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Vickerman, B.M.; O’banion, C.P.; Tan, X.; Lawrence, D.S. Light-Controlled Release of Therapeutic Proteins from Red Blood Cells. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Lejeune, A.; Moorjani, M.; Gicquaud, C.; Lacroix, J.; Poyet, P.; Gaudreault, C.R. Nanoerythrosome, a new derivative of erythrocyte ghost: Preparation and antineoplastic potential as drug carrier for daunorubicin. Anticancer Res. 1994, 14, 915–919. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  184. Lejeune, A.; Poyet, P.; C.-Gaudreault, R.; Gicquaud, C. Nanoerythrosomes, a new derivative of erythrocyte ghost: III. Is phagocytosis involved in the mechanism of action? Anticancer Res. 1997, 17, 3599–3603. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  185. Deák, R.; Mihály, J.; Szigyártó, I.C.; Wacha, A.; Lelkes, G.; Bóta, A. Physicochemical characterization of artificial nanoerythrosomes derived from erythrocyte ghost membranes. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Deák, R.; Mihály, J.; Szigyártó, I.C.; Beke-Somfai, T.; Turiák, L.; Drahos, L.; Wacha, A.; Bóta, A.; Varga, Z. Nanoerythrosomes tailoring: Lipid induced protein scaffolding in ghost membrane derived vesicles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 109, 110428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Heinrich, V.; Ritchie, K.; Mohandas, N.; Evans, E. Elastic thickness compressibilty of the red cell membrane. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 1452–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. Buss, N.; Yasa, O.; Alapan, Y.; Akolpoglu, M.B.; Sitti, M. Nanoerythrosome-functionalized biohybrid microswimmers. APL Bioeng. 2020, 4, 26103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Han, X.; Shen, S.; Fan, Q.; Chen, G.; Archibong, E.; Dotti, G.; Liu, Z.; Gu, Z.; Wang, C. Red blood cell-derived nanoerythrosome for antigen delivery with enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Gupta, N.; Patel, B.; Nahar, K.; Ahsan, F. Cell permeable peptide conjugated nanoerythrosomes of fasudil prolong pulmonary arterial vasodilation in PAH rats. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2014, 88, 1046–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Bahmani, B.; Bacon, D.; Anvari, B. Erythrocyte-derived photo-theranostic agents: Hybrid nano-vesicles containing indocyanine green for near infrared imaging and therapeutic applications. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Mac, J.T.; Nuñez, V.; Burns, J.M.; Guerrero, Y.A.; Vullev, V.I.; Anvari, B. Erythrocyte-derived nano-probes functionalized with antibodies for targeted near infrared fluorescence imaging of cancer cells. Biomed. Opt. Express 2016, 7, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Kostevšek, N.; Miklavc, P.; Kisovec, M.; Podobnik, M.; Al-Jamal, W.; Serša, I. Magneto-Erythrocyte Membrane Vesicles’ Superior T2 MRI Contrast Agents to Magneto-Liposomes. Magnetochemistry 2021, 7, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Kuo, Y.C.; Wu, H.C.; Hoang, D.; Bentley, W.E.; D’Souza, W.D.; Raghavan, S.R. Colloidal Properties of Nanoerythrosomes Derived from Bovine Red Blood Cells. Langmuir 2016, 32, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Pouliot, R.; Saint-Laurent, A.; Chypre, C.; Audet, R.; Vitté-Mony, I.; -Gaudreault, R.C.; Auger, M. Spectroscopic characterization of nanoErythrosomes in the absence and presence of conjugated polyethyleneglycols: An FTIR and 31P-NMR study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2002, 1564, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Seguin, B.; Fried, E. Microphysical derivation of the Canham-Helfrich free-energy density. J. Math. Biol. 2014, 68, 647–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Canham, P.B. The minimum energy of bending as a possible explanation of the biconcave shape of the human red blood cell. J. Theor. Biol. 1970, 26, 61–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Pham, C.T.; Zhang, X.; Lam, A.; Le, M.T.N. Red blood cell extracellular vesicles as robust carriers of RNA-based therapeutics. Cell Stress 2018, 2, 239–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Harisa, G.I.; Badran, M.M.; Alanazi, F.K. Erythrocyte nanovesicles: Biogenesis, biological roles and therapeutic approach: Erythrocyte nanovesicles. Saudi Pharm. J. 2017, 25, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Ciana, A.; Achilli, C.; Gaur, A.; Minetti, G. Membrane Remodelling and Vesicle Formation During Ageing of Human Red Blood Cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 42, 1127–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Wadhwa, R.; Aggarwal, T.; Thapliyal, N.; Kumar, A.; Priya; Yadav, P.; Kumari, V.; Reddy, B.S.C.; Chandra, P.; Maurya, P.K. Red blood cells as an efficient in vitro model for evaluating the efficacy of metallic nanoparticles. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Cataldi, M.; Vigliotti, C.; Mosca, T.; Cammarota, M.R.; Capone, D. Emerging role of the spleen in the pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies, nanoparticles and exosomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Longmire, M.; Choyke, P.L.; Kobayashi, H. Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: Considerations and caveats. Nanomedicine 2008, 3, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Sørensen, K.K.; McCourt, P.; Berg, T.; Crossley, C.; Le Couteur, D.; Wake, K.; Smedsrød, B. The scavenger endothelial cell: A new player in homeostasis and immunity. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2012, 303, R1217–R1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Hayashi, Y.; Takamiya, M.; Jensen, P.B.; Ojea-Jiménez, I.; Claude, H.; Antony, C.; Kjaer-Sorensen, K.; Grabher, C.; Boesen, T.; Gilliland, D.; et al. Differential Nanoparticle Sequestration by Macrophages and Scavenger Endothelial Cells Visualized in Vivo in Real-Time and at Ultrastructural Resolution. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 1665–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Ishida, T.; Harashima, H.; Kiwada, H. Liposome Clearance. Biosci. Rep. 2002, 22, 197–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Lima, T.; Bernfur, K.; Vilanova, M.; Cedervall, T. Understanding the Lipid and Protein Corona Formation on Different Sized Polymeric Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Pedersen, M.B.; Zhou, X.; Larsen, E.K.U.; Sørensen, U.S.; Kjems, J.; Nygaard, J.V.; Nyengaard, J.R.; Meyer, R.L.; Boesen, T.; Vorup-Jensen, T. Curvature of Synthetic and Natural Surfaces Is an Important Target Feature in Classical Pathway Complement Activation. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1931–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  209. Yona, S.; Gordon, S. From the Reticuloendothelial to Mononuclear Phagocyte System—The Unaccounted Years. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Vroman, L. Effect of adsorbed proteins on the wettability of hydrophilic and hydrophobic solids. Nature 1962, 196, 476–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Lazarovits, J.; Chen, Y.Y.; Sykes, E.A.; Chan, W.C.W. Nanoparticle-blood interactions: The implications on solid tumour targeting. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2756–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Neun, B.W.; Barenholz, Y.; Szebeni, J.; Dobrovolskaia, M.A. Understanding the role of anti-PEG antibodies in the complement activation by Doxil in vitro. Molecules 2018, 23, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Hashizume, H.; Baluk, P.; Morikawa, S.; McLean, J.W.; Thurston, G.; Roberge, S.; Jain, R.K.; McDonald, D.M. Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 1363–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Matsumura, Y.; Maeda, H. A New Concept for Macromolecular Therapeutics in Cancer Chemotherapy: Mechanism of Tumoritropic Accumulation of Proteins and the Antitumor Agent Smancs. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 6387–6392. [Google Scholar]
  215. Benatti, U.; Giovine, M.; Damonte, G.; Gasparini, A.; Scarfi, S.; De Flora, A.; Fraternale, A.; Rossi, L.; Magnani, M. Azidothymidine homodinucleotide-loaded erythrocytes as bioreactors for slow delivery of the antiretroviral drug Azidothymidine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 220, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Chiarantini, L.; Rossi, L.; Fraternale, A.; Magnani, M. Modulated red blood cell survival by membrane protein clustering. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1995, 144, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Bozzuto, G.; Molinari, A. Liposomes as nanomedical devices. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Hanley, T.; Yin, R.; Mac, J.T.; Tan, W.; Anvari, B. Functionalized erythrocyte-derived optical nanoparticles to target ephrin-B2 ligands. J. Biomed. Opt. 2019, 24, 85002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Yang, H.; Tong, Z.; Sun, S.; Mao, Z. Enhancement of tumour penetration by nanomedicines through strategies based on transport processes and barriers. J. Control. Release 2020, 328, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Minchinton, A.I.; Tannock, I.F. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Daskalaki, I.; Gkikas, I.; Tavernarakis, N. Hypoxia and selective autophagy in cancer development and therapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Kwon, I.K.; Lee, S.C.; Han, B.; Park, K. Analysis on the current status of targeted drug delivery to tumors. J. Control. Release 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Baxter, L.T.; Jain, R.K. Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors. I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc. Res. 1989, 37, 77–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Zein, R.; Sharrouf, W.; Selting, K. Physical Properties of Nanoparticles That Result in Improved Cancer Targeting. J. Oncol. 2020, 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Itoh, Y.; Nagase, H. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer. Essays Biochem. 2002, 38, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  226. Attia, M.F.; Anton, N.; Wallyn, J.; Omran, Z.; Vandamme, T.F. An overview of active and passive targeting strategies to improve the nanocarriers efficiency to tumour sites. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 71, 1185–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Yu, X.; Trase, I.; Ren, M.; Duval, K.; Guo, X.; Chen, Z. Design of Nanoparticle-Based Carriers for Targeted Drug Delivery. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Villa, C.H.; Pan, D.C.; Zaitsev, S.; Cines, D.B.; Siegel, D.L.; Muzykantov, V.R. Delivery of drugs bound to erythrocytes: New avenues for an old intravascular carrier. Ther. Deliv. 2015, 6, 795–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Smirnov, V.N.; Domogatsky, S.P.; Dolgov, V.V.; Hvatov, V.B.; Klibanov, A.L.; Koteliansky, V.E.; Muzykantov, V.R.; Repin, V.S.; Samokhin, G.P.; Shekhonin, B.V. Carrier-directed targeting of liposomes and erythrocytes to denuded areas of vessel wall. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 6603–6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Zhang, Z.; Qian, H.; Huang, J.; Sha, H.; Zhang, H.; Yu, L.; Liu, B.; Hua, D.; Qian, X. Anti-EGFR-iRGD recombinant protein modified biomimetic nanoparticles loaded with gambogic acid to enhance targeting and antitumor ability in colorectal cancer treatment. Int. J. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 4961–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  231. Lim, K.R.; Maruyama, R.; Yokota, T. Eteplirsen in the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2017, 11, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  232. Tolcher, A.W.; Rodrigueza, W.V.; Rasco, D.W.; Patnaik, A.; Papadopoulos, K.P.; Amaya, A.; Moore, T.D.; Gaylor, S.K.; Bisgaier, C.L.; Sooch, M.P.; et al. A phase 1 study of the BCL2-targeted deoxyribonucleic acid inhibitor (DNAi) PNT2258 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2014, 73, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  233. Kepczyński, M.; Nawalany, K.; Kumorek, M.; Kobierska, A.; Jachimska, B.; Nowakowska, M. Which physical and structural factors of liposome carriers control their drug-loading efficiency? Chem. Phys. Lipids 2008, 155, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Zucker, D.; Marcus, D.; Barenholz, Y.; Goldblum, A. Liposome drugs’ loading efficiency: A working model based on loading conditions and drug’s physicochemical properties. J. Control. Release 2009, 139, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Haran, G.; Cohen, R.; Bar, L.K.; Barenholz, Y. Transmembrane ammonium sulfate gradients in liposomes produce efficient and stable entrapment of amphipathic weak bases. BBA Biomembr. 1993, 1151, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Tolcher, A.W.; Papadopoulos, K.P.; Patnaik, A.; Rasco, D.W.; Martinez, D.; Wood, D.L.; Fielman, B.; Sharma, M.; Janisch, L.A.; Brown, B.D.; et al. Safety and activity of DCR-MYC, a first-in-class Dicer-substrate small interfering RNA (DsiRNA) targeting MYC, in a phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 11006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Schnitzler, T.; Herrmann, A. DNA block copolymers: Functional materials for nanoscience and biomedicine. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Cheng, X.; Lee, R.J. The role of helper lipids in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) designed for oligonucleotide delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 99, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Kodama, Y.; Kuramoto, H.; Mieda, Y.; Muro, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Kurosaki, T.; Sakaguchi, M.; Nakamura, T.; Kitahara, T.; Sasaki, H. Application of biodegradable dendrigraft poly-l-lysine to a small interfering RNA delivery system. J. Drug Target. 2017, 25, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Gorzkiewicz, M.; Konopka, M.; Janaszewska, A.; Tarasenko, I.I.; Sheveleva, N.N.; Gajek, A.; Neelov, I.M.; Klajnert-Maculewicz, B. Application of new lysine-based peptide dendrimers D3K2 and D3G2 for gene delivery: Specific cytotoxicity to cancer cells and transfection in vitro. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 95, 103504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Vlassov, A.; Khvorova, A.; Yarus, M. Binding and disruption of phospholipid bilayers by supramolecular RNA complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 7706–7711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  242. Janas, T.; Yarus, M. Visualization of membrane RNAs. RNA 2003, 9, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Summary of internal loading methods. Hb can be maintained or not according to the processing procedure and the identity of the cargo. In the inset the most important unwanted effects are shown. The explanation can be found in the text. PDB entries: Human L-Asparaginase 4O0H [113]; E. coli thymidine phosphorylase 4LHM [114]; Mouse Band 3 4YZF [88]. Models were created using VMD software.
Figure 1. Summary of internal loading methods. Hb can be maintained or not according to the processing procedure and the identity of the cargo. In the inset the most important unwanted effects are shown. The explanation can be found in the text. PDB entries: Human L-Asparaginase 4O0H [113]; E. coli thymidine phosphorylase 4LHM [114]; Mouse Band 3 4YZF [88]. Models were created using VMD software.
Ijms 22 05264 g001
Figure 2. Native erythrocytes and ghosts are features that must be taken in account while developing a drug carrier. Band 3 protein (4YZF [88]), a bicarbonate/chloride ion exchanger, in contact with cytoskeleton via ankyrin, shows on its surface the AB0 antigen glycans; glycocalyx also comprises sialic acid, a phagocytosis mediator or inhibitor; CD47 (2JJS, [84]) is an ubiquitous integral protein that acts as a switch for macrophages phagocytosis interacting with a SIRPα receptor.
Figure 2. Native erythrocytes and ghosts are features that must be taken in account while developing a drug carrier. Band 3 protein (4YZF [88]), a bicarbonate/chloride ion exchanger, in contact with cytoskeleton via ankyrin, shows on its surface the AB0 antigen glycans; glycocalyx also comprises sialic acid, a phagocytosis mediator or inhibitor; CD47 (2JJS, [84]) is an ubiquitous integral protein that acts as a switch for macrophages phagocytosis interacting with a SIRPα receptor.
Ijms 22 05264 g002
Figure 3. Main clearance pathways of erythrocytes, nano-erythrosomes and uncoated liposomes (i.e., without PEGylation). Solid black arrows represent the majority fate of the nanoparticles. In yellow arrows, the rapid and unescapable clearance exerted by spleen and liver on nanoparticle after mononuclear phagocyte system recognition. Dashed arrows show the minority clearance pathways. In the interaction with mononuclear phagocyte system, there is a strong dependence on the opsonization of nanoparticles, by antibodies, serum albumin, etc. If the nanoparticle is loaded with dsRNA, the sensing of such a presence elicits the activation of interferone-tyrosin kinase cascade [4] and RNAse L activity. Then, the liposome is degraded by the liver. In the case of nano-erythrosomes, the supposed clearance pathways partially superimpose on the liposomes. However, being recognized as self, they are not be prone to MPS interaction. The most wanted localization of a nanoparticle in cancer therapy is in tumor tissues. Nanoparticles have to be small enough to take advantage of the EPR effect [27] Lastly, the natural process of aging in erythrocytes leads to their degradation in the spleen. The spleen model can be retrieved here (bit.ly/3uMnhsl)e for attribution.
Figure 3. Main clearance pathways of erythrocytes, nano-erythrosomes and uncoated liposomes (i.e., without PEGylation). Solid black arrows represent the majority fate of the nanoparticles. In yellow arrows, the rapid and unescapable clearance exerted by spleen and liver on nanoparticle after mononuclear phagocyte system recognition. Dashed arrows show the minority clearance pathways. In the interaction with mononuclear phagocyte system, there is a strong dependence on the opsonization of nanoparticles, by antibodies, serum albumin, etc. If the nanoparticle is loaded with dsRNA, the sensing of such a presence elicits the activation of interferone-tyrosin kinase cascade [4] and RNAse L activity. Then, the liposome is degraded by the liver. In the case of nano-erythrosomes, the supposed clearance pathways partially superimpose on the liposomes. However, being recognized as self, they are not be prone to MPS interaction. The most wanted localization of a nanoparticle in cancer therapy is in tumor tissues. Nanoparticles have to be small enough to take advantage of the EPR effect [27] Lastly, the natural process of aging in erythrocytes leads to their degradation in the spleen. The spleen model can be retrieved here (bit.ly/3uMnhsl)e for attribution.
Ijms 22 05264 g003
Table 1. Comparison of techniques and cases of erythrocytes loaded with NAs.
Table 1. Comparison of techniques and cases of erythrocytes loaded with NAs.
Loading TechniqueNA LoadedEncapsulation EfficiencyPre-Treatment of n.a.Integrity of NAReference
Hypotonic swellingPlasmidic and genomic DNA20%Compacted with PEG6000 Not reported[100]
Hypotonic swelling and freeze-thaw cyclesDNA for transfection6–20% NoneNot reported[101]
Hypotonic swellingAnti-sense Oligonucleotides10%Complexed with 25 kDa polyethyleneimineNot reported[102]
Hypotonic swellingtRNA10%NoneAround 50% on PAA gel[103]
ElectroporationmRNA on whole blood cellsNo quantifiedNoneNo data[13]
Hypotonic swelling + electroporationPlasmidic DNANot quantified NoneInteger and amplifiable with RT-PCR[5]
Isotonic dialysis RNA and DNAUp to 35% with 37° incubation; larger for smaller moleculesNoneInteger as assayed on gel-electrophoresis[104]
Hypotonic dialysisAntisense Peptide NA14%NoneAssumed integer as assayed by HPLC[105]
Hypotonic dialysisAntisense Peptide NAsAround 10%NoneAssumed integer as assayed by HPLC[106]
Table 2. Erythrocyte-based formulations in clinical trials. All URLs were accessed in 10 May 2021.
Table 2. Erythrocyte-based formulations in clinical trials. All URLs were accessed in 10 May 2021.
Condition TreatedDrugCompanyTrial Number
Ataxia telangiectasiaDexamethasone 21-phosphateEryDel
Italy & USA
http://www.erydel.com
NCT02770807
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia/pancreatic cancerAsparaginaseERYtech Pharma
France and USA
http://www.erytech.com
NCT02195180
Mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalomyopathyThymidine phosphorylaseSt George’s, University of London UK
The Clinical Trial Company UK
Orphan Technologies Ltd. CH
NCT03866954
PhenylketonuriaRTX-134Rubius USA
http://www.rubiustx.com
NCT04110496
Celiac diseaseKAN101Anokion
USA & Switzerland
https://anokion.com
NCT04248855
Table 3. Summary of established advantages and possible drawbacks of nano-erythrosomes use as drug carrier.
Table 3. Summary of established advantages and possible drawbacks of nano-erythrosomes use as drug carrier.
PropertiesAdvantages Possible Drawbacks
Interaction with blood plasma
  • Virtually no opsonization, complement activation, protein deposition, IgG or IgM interaction in mature and normal erythrocytes
  • Low immunogenic effect on innate immune system cells without any further functionalization if used as DDS for epitope vaccination;
  • Unknown, if any, composition of the “biocorona” of nanoparticles
Accumulation and clearance
  • Assumed being able to cross leaky blood vessels fenestration and tendency to accumulate in cancer tissues due to EPR effect.
  • Extravasation could lead to a-specific delivery
  • Phosphatidylserine exposure on outer leaflet could lead to rapid clearance;
  • Due to the size of hydrodynamic radius (100–200 nm), there could be still uptake from spleen MZ-macrophages and hepatic Kupffer cells;
  • Unknown mechanisms of internalization in cells, of endosomal capture and escape (if any)
Drug delivery and release mechanism
  • Possible internalization similarly to liposomes: bilayer fusion, endocytosis and endosomal escape, phagocytosis.
  • Unknown solubility or partition of a random drug within the bilayer or in the hollow core;
  • Unknown kinetic of model-drug release;
Surface modifications
  • Huge yield in terms of surface/volume ratio, 1000–2000 nano-erythrosomes of 200 nm from one single erythrocyte;
  • Easy surface decoration for multiple purposes due to the presence of membrane proteins retained (targeting, PEGylation, polymer coating)
  • External loading with organic nanoparticles could lead to merging ROS generation and subsequent lysis [201]
Stability
  • No known tendency to coalesce and aggregate, due to electrical repulsion among nanoparticles;
  • Thermodynamic stability even after freeze drying [185,186]
  • No need for surface stabilizing agents.
  • In absence of ATP unknown kinetic of flip flop of lipids;
  • Unknown pH resistance;
  • Possible mechanic and osmotic fragility due to hemoglobin depletion and shear stress treatments.
Drug loading efficiency
  • In isotonic condition, polarity and solubility in water of the drug are not conditions affecting the loading efficiency;
  • Embedding the drug in the bilayer and in the glycocalyx is possible.
  • Eventual binding of the drug to inner-membrane of the nano-erythrosome must be characterized;
  • Uncertainty of which loading method is the most suitable;
  • Remote active loading techniques cannot be used [28];
  • Electric repulsion between carrier and drug in case of NAs;
  • Possible unwanted external loading of NAs on surface proteins
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Della Pelle, G.; Kostevšek, N. Nucleic Acid Delivery with Red-Blood-Cell-Based Carriers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105264

AMA Style

Della Pelle G, Kostevšek N. Nucleic Acid Delivery with Red-Blood-Cell-Based Carriers. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(10):5264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Della Pelle, Giulia, and Nina Kostevšek. 2021. "Nucleic Acid Delivery with Red-Blood-Cell-Based Carriers" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 10: 5264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop