Next Article in Journal
Natural Medicines and Their Underlying Mechanisms of Prevention and Recovery from Amyloid Β-Induced Axonal Degeneration in Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Putative Roles for Peptidylarginine Deiminases in COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Male sterile 305 Mutation Leads the Misregulation of Anther Cuticle Formation by Disrupting Lipid Metabolism in Maize
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mitochondrial Genome Assembly of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) Reveals Two Different atp6 Gene Sequences in Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Accessions

1
Department of Agronomy Food Natural Resources Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Campus of Agripolis, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy
2
Department of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(13), 4664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134664
Submission received: 6 June 2020 / Revised: 29 June 2020 / Accepted: 29 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Fertility and Sexual Reproduction)

Abstract

:
Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) has always aroused interest among researchers and breeders, being a valuable resource widely exploited not only to breed F1 hybrid varieties but also to investigate genes that control stamen and pollen development. With the aim of identifying candidate genes for CMS in fennel, we adopted an effective strategy relying on the comparison between mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) of both fertile and sterile genotypes. mtDNA raw reads derived from a CMS genotype were assembled in a single molecule (296,483 bp), while a draft mtDNA assembly (166,124 nucleotides, 94 contigs) was performed using male fertile sample (MF) sequences. From their annotation and alignment, two atp6-like sequences were identified. atp6, the putative mutant copy with a 300 bp truncation at the 5’-end, was found only in the mtDNA of CMS samples, while the wild type copy (atp6+) was detected only in the MF mtDNA. Further analyses (i.e., reads mapping and Sanger sequencing), revealed an atp6+ copy also in CMS samples, probably in the nuclear DNA. However, qPCRs performed on different tissues proved that, despite its availability, atp6+ is expressed only in MF samples, while apt6 mRNA was always detected in CMS individuals. In the light of these findings, the energy deficiency model could explain the pollen deficiency observed in male sterile flower. atp6 could represent a gene whose mRNA is translated into a not-fully functional protein leading to suboptimal ATP production that guarantees essential cellular processes but not a high energy demand process such as pollen development. Our study provides novel insights into the fennel mtDNA genome and its atp6 genes, and paves the way for further studies aimed at understanding their functional roles in the determination of male sterility.

1. Introduction

Plant male sterility (MS), is generally defined as the inability of plants to produce functional pollen, dehiscent anthers, or viable male gametes [1]. According to their mode of inheritance, two types of MS are recognized: Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS), which is caused by mitochondrial genes coupled with fertility restoring nuclear genes, and nuclear or genic male sterility (NMS or GMS), determined exclusively by nuclear genes [2].
Both types of MS are currently exploited for breeding purposes and hybrid constitution and the worldwide crop production has tremendously benefited from their utilization. It is estimated that hybrid vigor can offer, on average, from 20% to over 50% increases [3] and this would explain why hybrid seeds market, valued at $52 billion in 2016, is expected to reach at $99 billion by 2023, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 9.7% [4].
CMS is more widely used than GMS because this maternally inherited trait can be applied, preserved and restored more efficiently [5,6]. In fact, a CMS-based hybrid seed technology only requires a CMS line, a sterility maintainer line, and a fertility restorer line [7,8]. Moreover, in addition to its wide application in hybrid production, CMS provides important resources to investigate stamen and pollen development and to study the crosstalk between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes [9]. Most of the CMS genes reviewed by Chen and Liu [1] belonged to the mitochondrial electron transfer chain (mtETC) or to the ATP synthase complex and, among them, it is worth mentioning cox1 [9,10], atp8 [11], and atp6 [5,12,13]. In other cases, species-specific mitochondrial open reading frames (ORFs) encoding for transmembrane proteins were found to be responsible for CMS [14,15]. According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [16] CMS-related genes have been identified and deposited for at least 76 plant species, including cereals such as bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) [17], rice (Oryza sativa) [18], and maize (Zea mays) [19], and crops like stem mustard (Brassica juncea) [20,21], onion (Allium cepa) [9], pepper (Capsicum annuum) [5], radish (Raphanus sativus) [22], sunflower (Helianthus annuus) [23], and carrot (Daucus carota) [11]. In fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), the presence of a naturally occurring NMS system has never been reported while several spontaneous CMS mutants have been discovered and exploited by breeders since the late 1960s [24,25]. These mutants are widely used for the development of F1 hybrids [2] that, today, represent the 95% of the cultivated fennel varieties [26]. Strikingly, despite its economic relevance (more than 1 million tons produced in 2018, with a gross production value of $6.5 billion [27]), the genetic mechanism underlying the cytoplasmic male sterility in fennel is far from being understood and no candidate gene has been identified yet. What is more, the only biological data currently available for this species in public databases (e.g., GenBank) are the plastome [28], an early genome draft [2] and a leaf transcriptome [29].
It is now well understood that one of the most effective strategies to identify CMS candidate genes relies on the comparison between mitochondrial genomes of both fertile and sterile genotypes, to search for differences in terms of sequences or structure organization [30,31]. In the last few years the identification of such genes has been greatly facilitated by the advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): To date 311 plant mitochondrial genomes are available in the NCBI organelle genome database [32] and this number is constantly increasing thanks to the ongoing evolution of sequencing technology and the decrease in sequencing costs [33].
Following this approach, in the present study we performed a fennel genome mitochondrial assembly based on data collected from public repositories and we then looked for nucleotide variants comparing sequences from both fertile and sterile lines.

2. Results

2.1. Mitochondrial Genome Sequence and Annotation

486,047,668 reads Illumina HiSeq 2500 (150 bp PE, Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) derived from the Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of a cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) accession (SRX7730623) of Foeniculum vulgare, were assembled in a single mtDNA molecule of 296,483 bp with a GC contents of 45.9% (Supplementary File 1). Mapping back the reads to validate the mtDNA assembly, the proportion of properly aligned reads was 0.3% with an average coverage depth of 758×. From the annotation step performed through GeSeq [34] 24 mtDNA genes, 26 ORFs, 25 tRNAs, and 9 rRNAs were identified (Figure 1, Supplementary File 2).
In parallel, 17,377,226 reads Ion GeneStudio S5 System (400 bp SE, Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) were retrieved from the WGS of a male fertile (MF) fennel accession (SRX2770225) and assembled in 94 contigs (Supplementary File 3), ranging from 168 bp to 10,174 bp (total length 166,124 bp, N50 = 4702, L50 = 12) and a GC contents of 46.3%. The percentage of raw reads that were correctly mapped back to the MF mtDNA contigs was 0.4%, with an average coverage depth of 151×. GeSeq [34] allowed for the identification and annotation of 24 mtDNA genes, 24 ORFs, 19 tRNAs, and 9 rRNAs were identified (Supplementary File 4).
From a comparison among the CMS and MF mitochondrial genomes, a one-to-one correspondence was found for three ribosomal protein large subunits (rpl2, rpl5, rpl10), six ribosomal protein small subunits (rps1, rps3, rps4, rps7, rps12, rps13); nine nadh dehydrogenase subunits (nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5, nad6, nad7, and nad9, complex I), three cytochrome oxidase subunits (cox1, cox2, and cox3, complex IV), cytochrome b (cob, complex III), five atp synthase subunits (atp1, atp4, atp6, atp8 and atp9, complex V), four cytochrome C synthesis related proteins (ccmB, ccmC, ccmFc and ccmFn), matR, and mttB.

2.2. SNP and InDel Detection

In order to identify sequence variations between the MF and CMS accessions, SNPs and InDels were searched aligning the mtDNA MF contigs against the CMS mtDNA. As shown in Table 1, 63 variants, namely 36 SNPs and 27 InDels, were detected.
Among the sequence variations, 22 occurred in extra genic regions, 6 within intron regions and, as a main finding, atp6 and rps3 were the only two CDS regions showing nucleotide variants between fertile and sterile samples (Table 1, in bold). As regards the rps3 gene (1659 bp), all the 3 SNPs resulted non-synonymous (Figure S1), while for atp6, 31 variants were responsible for 28 amino acid mismatches (Figure S2). More interestingly, the first 300 bp of the MF atp6 copy (from now on defined as atp6+, 1167 bp) were missing in the atp6 copy (henceforth atp6, 864 bp) found in male sterile mtDNA (Figure 2).

2.3. Selection of Candidate Gene Controlling Cytoplasmic Male Sterility

Following the results obtained for atp6, raw sequencing reads from both MF and CMS GenBank accessions were mapped back to atp6+ and atp6. As reported in Figure 3, panel A, MF reads were successfully mapped only to the atp6+ copy, while CMS reads aligned both against atp6+ and atp6. However, the alignment coverage of these latter reads against the atp6+ copy was considerably lower than the coverage exhibited against the atp6 (Figure 3, panel A).
The results obtained from the reads mapping were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing two different CMS lines and their MF maintainers by means of two different gene-specific primer sets. As shown in Figure 3, panel B, male fertile samples exhibited PCR amplicons only for atp6+, while the CMS accessions were successfully amplified at both loci. Although atp6+ primers binding sites were found conserved in both CMS and MF accessions, the intensity of the band for atp6+ was very low for male sterile individuals (Figure 3B, the original picture of the agarose gel is available as Figure S3). The same result was also confirmed in a further amplification experiment conducted on four additional different commercial CMS accessions and their MF maintainers (Figure S4).
Finally, from the alignment of the resulting proteins of atp6+ (388 amino acids) and atp6 (287 amino acids) with atp6 of Daucus carota (Dc_atp6, 383 amino acids), the percentage of pairwise identical residues was 92.3% between atp6+ and Dc_atp6 and 90.2% between atp6 and Dc_atp6 (Figure 3, panel C). This finding, along with the comparable sequence length of atp6+ and Dc_atp6 (i.e., 388 vs. 383 amino acids), led to the hypothesis that atp6+ represents the wt allele.

2.4. Expression Analyses of atp6+, atp6, atp1, and atp9

The expression patterns of four genes, atp6+, atp6 atp1, and atp9 were successfully analyzed in leaves and flowers at three different developmental stages (0% flowering, 50% flowering and 100% flowering) of two CMS commercial lines and their MF maintainer (Figure 4). atp6+ and atp6 were found to be constantly and exclusively expressed only in MF or CMS, respectively (Figure 4, panels A and B). Vice versa, atp1 and atp9, used here as positive controls, were constantly expressed in all the tissues considered without significant differences between CMS and MF samples (Figure 4, panels C and D).

3. Discussion

In the last five years, the knowledge about extranuclear genomes of the Apiaceae family, whose aromatic plants are extensively used for several purposes, including food products (e.g., celery and fennel), beverages (e.g., carrot), flavoring components (e.g., cumin), cosmetics (e.g., tōki), and pharmaceuticals (e.g., carrot and fennel) [35,36], has considerably advanced thanks to the advent of NGS technologies. Several studies have greatly contributed not only to uncover the sequence, but also to comprehend the structure, expression, and variation of these organelles [37,38,39]. However, it must be acknowledged that in the face of 42 chloroplast (cp) genomes deposited in NCBI from as many Apiaceae species, only two mitochondrial (mt) genomes are available (i.e., Daucus carota and Bupleurum falcatum). A similar discrepancy is also observed at a wider level (i.e., plant level), being the number of plastid genomes (3.720) accessible in NCBI ten times larger than that of mitochondrial assemblies (311). This numerical disproportion can be attributed to several factors. First, in contrast to the cpDNA genome, mtDNA is more often characterized by heteroplasmy phenomena (i.e., co-existence of additional mitochondrial genome types called mitotypes) [40] and by a variety of different arrangements and configurations (circular, linear or branched molecules) [41,42,43] that can strongly affect their correct and exhaustive assembly. Moreover, when compared to cpDNA genomes, mtDNA has proven to be bigger and to contain more repeat regions as well as significant amounts of nuclear and chloroplast genomic sequences [44]. All these peculiarities, along with technical issues linked to the amount and the type of available reads (short vs. long), may limit the accurate assembly of this organelle genome. These observations would explain the different findings achieved in this study for the mtDNA assembly of male sterile and male fertile accessions of Foeniculum vulgare. We successfully managed to assembly the CMS mtDNA in a single molecule while the MF mtDNA was assembled only to a contig level. The main reason behind this discrepancy lies on the huge gap in terms of raw sequences available for the two contrasting phenotypes, being the MF reads accessible in GenBank less than a twentieth of the CMS ones. In fact, the poor coverage characterizing MF reads has complicated the assembly of extra genic regions and repetitive structures leading to the translation into gaps and incomplete results. On the contrary, the assembly of genic regions were comparable between the two mtDNAs and, in both cases, we were able to reconstruct the full sequences of 33 genes (excluding ORFs and tRNAs). This number is in agreement with what reported by Kubo and Newton [45], and Morley and Nielsen [46]: Excluding tRNAs and all the species-specific ORFs, the number of mitochondrial genes usually ranges from 27 (Beta vulgaris) to 39 (Zea Mays).
Based on the most complete assembly (the CMS one), the estimated size of the fennel mtDNA assembled in this study is 296,483 bp, 1.94 greater than the fennel plastome (153 kb) assembled by Peery et al. [28]. This is in line with what observed for Daucus carota (from the same family, Apiaceae) whose mtDNA is 281,132 bp in length and the ratio mtDNA/cpDNA is 1.80.
The SNP calling analysis, performed mapping the MF contigs to the CMS mtDNA, allowed us to detect 42 polymorphic loci able to discriminate the two antagonist phenotypes (i.e., MF and CMS plant genotypes) and, most importantly, to reveal the presence of two different atp6 copies. atp6+, considered the wild type copy based on the highest similarity with atp6 in Daucus carota was detected only in the male fertile mtDNA, atp6, the putative mutant copy with a 300 bp truncation at the 5’-end, was available only in the mtDNA of male sterile samples. As already observed for Rhazya stricta [47] and Arabidopsis thaliana [48], atp6, compared to other mt genes, is often characterized by extended repeat sequences located at the upstream region suggesting that this gene is more likely involved in genomic recombination events. Despite the data available for the MF mtDNA are not sufficient to demonstrate the presence of repeated regions in the 5’ region of atp6+, it is reasonable to assume that the truncation of 300 bp in atp6 is attributable to a mitochondrial rearrangement.
Following the validation analyses (i.e., mapping back the sequencing reads to both atp6 copies and performing PCR based on copies-specific primers) two main findings were achieved. First, atp6 was confirmed to be present only in the CMS samples and, thus, the F2/R2 primer couple (namely the one used to specifically amplify the atp6 copy) can be directly used in a molecular assay suitable for breeding purposes and for selecting only CMS samples. Second, atp6+ was detected also in CMS samples. However, the intensity of the atp6+ PCR band and the reads coverage was lower when compared to the mutant (atp6) counterpart (Figure 3A,B and Figures S3 and S4), suggesting that atp6+ is present as single copy in the nuclear genome, while atp6 is present in the mitochondrial genome, as supported by the CMS mtDNA assembly, the higher sequencing coverage and greater band intensity. A possible transfer of the atp6 gene to the nuclear genome would not be exclusive to Foeniculum vulgare: Genes duplication and/or relocation from the mitochondrion to the nucleus is a recurrent and consistent feature of eukaryotic genome evolution [49] and this phenomenon has already been described both in plants [50] and animals [51]. This was also confirmed in Daucus carota from an ex-post analysis that we performed aligning the mitochondrial atp6 gene (NC_017855.1:6101-7252) to the entire genome: An almost identical copy of this gene was found also within the chromosome 7 (NC_030387.1:11491922-11492723, E-value = 0.0, % identity = 99.50). It is also reasonable to think that a nuclear copy of atp6 is also present in MF genotypes, but, unfortunately, this hypothesis cannot be verified because the only whole genome sequencing available for fennel comes from a CMS individual [2].
The transcription analyses added another piece to this increasingly complex puzzle. While other ATP synthase subunits (i.e., atp1 and atp9) were constantly and equally expressed (i.e., no significant expression difference observed between CMS and MF), atp6+ was ubiquitously expressed in all the tissues of the MF samples and never detected in any CMS tissues. Thus, it can be postulated that the nuclear atp6+ copy is probably a pseudogene. Moreover, despite the 300 bp truncation at the 5’-end, atp6 mRNA was found to be constantly available in all the tissues analyzed for the CMS. The main findings are summarized in Figure 5.
It is well known that atp6 is a key component of the transmembrane Fo portion of the ATP synthase and it is frequently associated with CMS phenomena both in monocotyledon species such as rice [52], maize [53], and dicotyledon species such as pepper [5], sugar beet [13], brown mustard [12], carrot [39], kenaf [54], and sunflower [55].
Our results fit with the “energy deficiency model” according to which, the partial or total loss of function of one or more subunits belonging to the mtETC (complexes I-IV) or to the ATP synthase (complex V), can determine mitochondrial deficiencies [1]. This is supported by several evidences available in the scientific literature. In CMS sugar beet a truncated copy of cox2 (a subunit of complex IV) showed a decreased activity when compared to the wt copy and proved a molecular link between mtETC defect and male sterility [56]. In pol CMS of Brassica napus the mutant atp6 protein is thought to diminish the functionality of the complex V [57] while in CMS sunflower a chimeric protein orf522 seems to reduce the ATPase activity [58]. In Foeniculum vulgare, based on our findings, we assumed that atp6, being the only gene expressed in CMS fennel plants, must be also translated into protein. It can be assumed that atp6 proteins may affect ATP production by forming less efficient ATPase complexes that guarantee essential cellular processes (and thus the plant growth) but not a high energy demand process such as pollen development. Further analyses of post-translation events are necessary to determine the role of atp6 on the male-sterility induction.
In conclusion, our study provides useful findings and novel insights into the fennel mtDNA genome and its atp6 genes, and paves the way for functional studies in order to shed light on their roles in the determination of male sterility.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Assembly of Mitochondrial DNA

Two SRA sequence datasets, namely SRX2770225, and SRX7730623, were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank, under the taxonomy ID: 48038 (Foeniculum vulgare). The first archive was obtained from a male fertile sample (hereafter named “MF reads”), whereas SRX7730623 reads derived from a cytoplasmic male sterile accession (hereafter named “CMS reads”).
CMS reads were assembled using GetOrganelle software [59], a fast de novo genome organelle assembler. The program was run providing as seed the mitochondrial genome of D. carota (GenBank accession NC_017855.1), using the option -fast and setting the k-mers length used by SPAdes assembler [60] to 21, 65, and 105.
Since GetOrganelle is not optimized to run with Ion GeneStudio S5 sequences, an alternative approach was used instead to assemble the MF mitochondrial genome. At first, the reads set was aligned to the CMS mitochondrial genome using Bowtie2 program [61]. All the mapping reads were retrieved, and de novo assembled using SPAdes [60]. Spades was run setting the option –iontorrent and adjusting the k-mers length to 21,33,55,77,99 and 127.
Both genomes were finally annotated by means of GeSeq [34] using the mtDNA of Daucus carota (NC_017855.1) as a reference.

4.2. Variant Calling and Sanger DNA Sequencing Validation

The two new assembled genomes were compared to detect any variant. Contigs assembled from MF reads were mapped against the CMS mtDNA, using the “basic variant detection” tool (CLC Genomics Workbench 11.0.1, CLC Bio).
Following the results obtained from the variant calling analysis, raw reads from both MF and CMS accessions were mapped against the atp6 gene copy found within the mtDNA fertile (defined as atp6+) and the atp6 gene copy found within the mtDNA sterile (named atp6). Mapping was performed using the “map reads to contigs” tool of CLC Genomics Workbench 11.0.1 software (CLC Bio, Århus, Denmark) at default settings.
The two atp6 gene copies were also validated through a Sanger sequencing. Geneious 11.1.4 software (http://www.geneious.com [62]) was used to design primers, for the specific amplification of both atp6 copies. In details, for the analysis of atp6+, the following primers were used: F1: ATCGACCTGAACAACATATACGGA R1: GCTGGCGATTTCCGACAAGT while for atp6, F2: TCACTGAGCACTGTCTG and R2: CCTAGAGTCTTTCGATACTATA were employed. PCR reactions were performed on genomic DNA purified (DNAeasy Plant Mini Kit, Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), from 4 samples: Two CMS individuals from as many commercial lines and two samples from their two isogenic MF maintainers. Reactions were set up in a 20 µL reaction volume, containing 1× Platinum® Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), 0.5 µM of primers, 15 ng of genomic DNA and water up to volume A Veriti 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was programmed with the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 58 or 53 °C (atp6+ or atp6, respectively) for 30 s, 72 °C 90 s, and final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. Amplification was evaluated on a 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel stained with 1 x SYBR SafeTM DNA Gel Stain (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Amplicons were purified through ExoSap-IT (Applied Biosystems), sequenced (ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer, Applied Biosystem) using both forward and reverse gene specific primers, analyzed in Geneious 11.1.4 and deposited to GenBank (MT199323 and MT199324).

4.3. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The same four lines used for DNA sequencing validation (i.e., two CMS commercial lines and their two isogenic MF maintainers) were used for expression analyses. From each line we collected (in two biological replicates) four tissues: leaf, flower before anthesis (0% flowering), flower in half anthesis (50% flowering) and flower in full anthesis (100% flowering). Samples were ground in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was extracted using the SpectrumTM Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality and quantity were checked by means of conventional electrophoresis and spectrophotometry using a NanoDrop-1000 (Thermo Scientific). cDNA was synthetized starting from 500 ng of RNA using the SuperScriptTM IV VILO Master Mix (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Five genes, namely atp6+, atp6, atp1, and atp9 and gapdh (this latter used as housekeeping gene) were selected and primers were designed using Geneious 11.1.4 (Table S1). All the qPCRs were performed on a QuantStudio 3 machine (Thermo Scientific) following the PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix method (Applied Biosystems). Each reaction was carried out in a volume of 10 µL containing 5 µL of 2× SYBR Green, 0.5 µM of primers, 2 µL of 1:10-diluted cDNA and water up to volume. The run method set was as follows: initial denaturation 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s and primer annealing, extension and gathering the fluorescence signal at 60 °C for 30 s. Subsequently, the melting curve analysis was achieved to verify the specificity of the primer with the following program: 95 °C/15 s, 60 °C/1 min, and 95 °C/15 s. The output data were analyzed according to Livak et al. [63]. The baseline and threshold cycles (Ct) were automatically determined by the software of the system and the three technical replicates taken for each biological replicate were averaged. The resulting mean Ct values were normalized as difference in Ct values (ΔCt) between the analyzed mRNA and gapdh reference gene. The ΔCt values of each sample were then normalized with respect to the ΔCt values of the MF samples (ΔΔCt). Finally, the variation was reported as fold change (2−ΔΔCt).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/13/4664/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.P.; Methodology, F.P. and G.M.; Software, N.V. and F.P.; Writing—original draft preparation, F.P. and A.V.; Writing—review and editing, F.P., A.V., G.M., N.V. and G.B.; Funding acquisition, G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Alice Patella and Domiziana Battaggia for their help with some PCR experiments performed at the Laboratory of Genomics for Breeding, University of Padova (Italy). We wish to thank also Ian Dry and Elena Gonnelli for many helpful discussions on cytoplasmic male sterility.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Chen, L.; Liu, Y.-G. Male Sterility and Fertility Restoration in Crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014, 65, 579–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Palumbo, F.; Galla, G.; Vitulo, N.; Barcaccia, G. First draft genome sequencing of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.): Identification of simple sequence repeats and their application in marker-assisted breeding. Mol. Breed. 2018, 38, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tester, M.; Langridge, P. Breeding Technologies to Increase Crop Production in a Changing World. Science 2010, 327, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prasannan, A. Hybrid Seeds Market by Crop, Duration, Seed Treatment, Farm Type and Acreage: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast 2017-2023; Allied Market Research: Portland, OR, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, P.; Lu, Q.; Ai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Wu, L.; Liu, J.; Cheng, Q.; Sun, L.; Shen, H. Candidate gene selection for cytoplasmic male sterility in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) through whole mitochondrial genome sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Budar, F.; Pelletier, G. Male sterility in plants: Occurrence, determinism, significance and use. Comptes Rendus l’Academie des Sci. Ser. III 2001, 324, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, X.; Kaur, A.P.; MacKenzie, S.A.; Dweikat, I.M. Substoichiometric shifting in the fertility reversion of cytoplasmic male sterile pearl millet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Priyadarshan, P.M. Male sterility. In Plant breeding: Classical to Modern; Priyadarshan, P.M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 105–129. ISBN 9789811370953. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, B.; Yang, T.J.; Kim, S. Identification of a gene responsible for cytoplasmic male-sterility in onions (Allium cepa L.) using comparative analysis of mitochondrial genome sequences of two recently diverged cytoplasms. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, J.Y.; Lee, Y.P.; Lee, J.; Choi, B.S.; Kim, S.; Yang, T.J. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence and identification of a candidate gene responsible for cytoplasmic male sterility in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) containing DCGMS cytoplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 1763–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakajima, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Muranaka, T.; Oeda, K. A novel orfB-related gene of carrot mitochondrial genomes that is associated with homeotic cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 46, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jing, B.; Heng, S.; Tong, D.; Wan, Z.; Fu, T.; Tu, J.; Ma, C.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Shen, J. A male sterility-associated cytotoxic protein ORF288 in Brassica juncea causes aborted pollen development. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1285–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yamamoto, M.P.; Kubo, T.; Mikami, T. The 5′-leader sequence of sugar beet mitochondrial atp6 encodes a novel polypeptide that is characteristic of Owen cytoplasmic male sterility. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2005, 273, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Z.; Zou, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, L.; Wu, H.; Su, D.; Chen, Y.; Guo, J.; Luo, D.; et al. Cytoplasmic Male Sterility of Rice with Boro II Cytoplasm Is Caused by a Cytotoxic Peptide and is restored by Two Related PPR Motif Genes via Distinct Modes of mRNA Silencing. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Tang, H.V.; Pring, D.R.; Shaw, L.C.; Salazar, R.A.; Muza, F.R.; Yan, B.; Schertz, K.F. Transcript processing internal to a mitochondrial open reading frame is correlated with fertility restoration in male-sterile sorghum. Plant J. 1996, 10, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. National Library of Medicine National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleotide Database. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/ (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  17. Liu, C.G.; Hou, N.; Liu, L.K.; Liu, J.C.; Kang, X.S.; Zhang, A.M. A YA-type cytoplasmic male-sterile source in common wheat. Plant Breed. 2006, 125, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, J.Z.; Zhi-Guo, E.; Zhang, H.L.; Shu, Q.Y. Workable male sterility systems for hybrid rice: Genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, and utilization. Rice 2014, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gabay-Laughnan, S.; Laughnan, J.R. Male sterility and restorer genes in maize. In The Maize Handbook; Freeling, M., Walbot, V., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 418–423. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhao, N.; Xu, X.; Wamboldt, Y.; Mackenzie, S.A.; Yang, X.; Hu, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, M. MutS HOMOLOG1 silencing mediates ORF220 substoichiometric shifting and causes male sterility in Brassica juncea. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Heng, S.; Liu, S.; Xia, C.; Tang, H.Y.; Xie, F.; Fu, T.; Wan, Z. Morphological and genetic characterization of a new cytoplasmic male sterility system (oxa CMS) in stem mustard (Brassica juncea). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Hao, W.; Li, J.; Qi, M.; Zhang, L. Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing Reveals orf463a May Induce Male Sterility in NWB Cytoplasm. Genes 2020, 11, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hans Köhler, R.; Horn, R.; Lössl, A.; Zetsche, K. Cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower is correlated with the co-transcription of a new open reading frame with the atpA gene. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1991, 227, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quagliotti, L.; Accati, E.; Milanesio, M. Preliminary report on a functional type of male-sterility in fennel. In Proceedings of the 5th Eucarpia Congress, Milan, Italy, 30 September–2 October 1968; pp. 359–363. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ramanujam, S.; Tewari, V.P. Heterosis breeding in fennel. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 1970, 30, 732–737. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bruins, M. Modernising fennel. Available online: https://european-seed.com/2015/10/modernising-fennel/. (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  27. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Value of Agricultural Production. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/ (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  28. Peery, R.; Kuehl, J.V.; Boore, J.L.; Raubeson, L. Comparisons of three Apiaceae chloroplast genomes—coriander, dill and fennel. In Proceedings of the Botany 2006 Meeting, Chico, CA, USA, 28 July–2 August 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Palumbo, F.; Vannozzi, A.; Vitulo, N.; Lucchin, M.; Barcaccia, G. The leaf transcriptome of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.) enables characterization of the t-anethole pathway and the discovery of microsatellites and single-nucleotide variants. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, S.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, N.; Wang, Y.; Nie, H.; Hua, J. The comparison of four mitochondrial genomes reveals cytoplasmic male sterility candidate genes in cotton. BMC Genomics 2018, 19, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Allen, J.O.; Fauron, C.M.; Minx, P.; Roark, L.; Oddiraju, S.; Guan, N.L.; Meyer, L.; Sun, H.; Kim, K.; Wang, C.; et al. Comparisons among two fertile and three male-sterile mitochondrial genomes of maize. Genetics 2007, 177, 1173–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Organelle Genome Resources. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/organelle/ (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  33. Wu, Z.; Hu, K.; Yan, M.; Song, L.; Wen, J.; Ma, C.; Shen, J.; Fu, T.; Yi, B.; Tu, J. Mitochondrial genome and transcriptome analysis of five alloplasmic male-sterile lines in Brassica juncea. BMC Genomics 2019, 20, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tillich, M.; Lehwark, P.; Pellizzer, T.; Ulbricht-Jones, E.S.; Fischer, A.; Bock, R.; Greiner, S. GeSeq–Versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W6–W11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ngahang Kamte, S.L.; Ranjbarian, F.; Cianfaglione, K.; Sut, S.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Bruno, M.; Afshar, F.H.; Iannarelli, R.; Benelli, G.; Cappellacci, L.; et al. Identification of highly effective antitrypanosomal compounds in essential oils from the Apiaceae family. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sayed-Ahmad, B.; Talou, T.; Saad, Z.; Hijazi, A.; Merah, O. The Apiaceae: Ethnomedicinal family as source for industrial uses. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lee, H.O.; Joh, H.J.; Kim, K.; Lee, S.C.; Kim, N.H.; Park, J.Y.; Park, H.S.; Park, M.S.; Kim, S.; Kwak, M.; et al. Dynamic chloroplast genome rearrangement and DNA barcoding for three apiaceae species known as the medicinal herb “bang-poong”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yao, X.Y.; Chen, Z.X.; Wang, Q.Z. The complete chloroplast genome of Torilis scabra (Apiaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resour. 2019, 4, 2914–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tan, G.F.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Xiong, A.S. Different lengths, copies and expression levels of the mitochondrial atp6 gene in male sterile and fertile lines of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Mitochondrial DNA Part A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 2018, 29, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gualberto, J.M.; Newton, K.J. Plant Mitochondrial Genomes: Dynamics and Mechanisms of Mutation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2017, 68, 225–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kozik, A.; Rowan, B.A.; Lavelle, D.; Berke, L.; Eric Schranz, M.; Michelmore, R.W.; Christensen, A.C. The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Sloan, D.B. One ring to rule them all? Genome sequencing provides new insights into the “master circle” model of plant mitochondrial DNA structure. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 978–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mower, J.P.; Case, A.L.; Floro, E.R.; Willis, J.H. Evidence against equimolarity of large repeat arrangements and a predominant master circle structure of the mitochondrial genome from a monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) lineage with cryptic CMS. Genome Biol. Evol. 2012, 4, 670–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Zhang, F.; Li, W.; Gao, C.W.; Zhang, D.; Gao, L.Z. Deciphering tea tree chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of Camellia sinensis var. assamica. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kubo, T.; Newton, K.J. Angiosperm mitochondrial genomes and mutations. Mitochondrion 2008, 8, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Morley, S.A.; Nielsen, B.L. Plant mitochondrial DNA. Front. Biosci. 2017, 22, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar]
  47. Park, S.; Ruhlman, T.A.; Sabir, J.S.M.; Mutwakil, M.H.Z.; Baeshen, M.N.; Sabir, M.J.; Baeshen, N.A.; Jansen, R.K. Complete sequences of organelle genomes from the medicinal plant Rhazya stricta (Apocynaceae) and contrasting patterns of mitochondrial genome evolution across asterids. BMC Genomics 2014, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Marienfeld, J.; Unseld, M.; Brandt, P.; Brennicke, A. Genomic recombination of the mitochondrial atp6 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana at the protein processing site creates two different presequences. DNA Res. 1996, 3, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Brandvain, Y.; Wade, M.J. The functional transfer of genes from the mitochondria to the nucleus: The effects of selection, mutation, population size and rate of self-fertilization. Genetics 2009, 182, 1129–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Funes, S.; Davidson, E.; Gonzalo Claros, M.; Van Lis, R.; Pérez-Martínez, X.; Vázquez-Acevedo, M.; King, M.P.; González-Halphen, D. The typically mitochondrial DNA-encoded ATP6 subunit of the F1F0-ATPase is encoded by a nuclear gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 6051–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Kohn, A.B.; Citarella, M.R.; Kocot, K.M.; Bobkova, Y.V.; Halanych, K.M.; Moroz, L.L. Rapid evolution of the compact and unusual mitochondrial genome in the ctenophore, Pleurobrachia bachei. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2012, 63, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Itabashi, E.; Kazama, T.; Toriyama, K. Characterization of cytoplasmic male sterility of rice with Lead Rice cytoplasm in comparison with that with Chinsurah Boro II cytoplasm. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dewey, R.E.; Timothy, D.H.; Levings, C.S. Chimeric mitochondrial genes expressed in the C male-sterile cytoplasm of maize. Curr. Genet. 1991, 20, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhao, Y.; Liao, X.; Zhou, B.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, R. Mutation in the coding sequence of atp6 are associated with male sterile cytoplasm in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Euphytica 2016, 207, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Makarenko, M.S.; Usatov, A.V.; Tatarinova, T.V.; Azarin, K.V.; Logacheva, M.D.; Gavrilova, V.A.; Kornienko, I.V.; Horn, R. Organization features of the mitochondrial genome of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) with ANN2-type male-sterile cytoplasm. Plants 2019, 8, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ducos, E.; Touzet, P.; Boutry, M. The male sterile G cytoplasm of wild beet displays modified mitochondrial respiratory complexes. Plant J. 2001, 26, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. An, H.; Yang, Z.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Shen, J.; Tu, J.; Ma, C.; Fu, T. Comparative transcript profiling of the fertile and sterile flower buds of pol CMS in B. napus. BMC Genomics 2014, 15, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sabar, M.; Gagliardi, D.; Balk, J.; Leaver, C.J. ORFB is a subunit of F1F0-ATP synthase: Insight into the basis of cytoplasmic male sterility in sunflower. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jin, J.-J.; Yu, W.-B.; Yang, J.-B.; Song, Y.; DePamphilis, C.W.; Yi, T.-S.; Li, D.-Z. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. bioRxiv 2019, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Annotation of Foeniculum vulgare mitochondrial genome assembled from a cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) accession. The annotation was created with GeSeq [34] and visualized with OGDRAW. Genes marked with an asterisk (*) contain introns.
Figure 1. Annotation of Foeniculum vulgare mitochondrial genome assembled from a cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) accession. The annotation was created with GeSeq [34] and visualized with OGDRAW. Genes marked with an asterisk (*) contain introns.
Ijms 21 04664 g001
Figure 2. Nucleotide acid alignment of atp6 genes sequences retrieved from the mtDNA of male fertile (MF, atp6+) and cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS, atp6) accessions of Foeniculum vulgare.
Figure 2. Nucleotide acid alignment of atp6 genes sequences retrieved from the mtDNA of male fertile (MF, atp6+) and cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS, atp6) accessions of Foeniculum vulgare.
Ijms 21 04664 g002
Figure 3. (A) Nucleotide alignment between the two atp6 copies retrieved within the mitochondrial genomes of Foeniculum vulgare. atp6+ indicates the wild type gene (1167 bp) found in the male fertile (MF) mtDNA while atp6 is an atp6-like sequence lacking the first 300 bp (864 bp) retrieved in the cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) mtDNA. Raw sequencing reads from MF and CMS accessions were mapped to atp6+ and atp6. (B) PCR profiles generated in two CMS commercial lines and their MF maintainers with specific primers for atp6+(left) and atp6 (right). (C) Protein alignment of atp6+, atp6, and the atp6 protein from Daucus carota (Dc_atp6).
Figure 3. (A) Nucleotide alignment between the two atp6 copies retrieved within the mitochondrial genomes of Foeniculum vulgare. atp6+ indicates the wild type gene (1167 bp) found in the male fertile (MF) mtDNA while atp6 is an atp6-like sequence lacking the first 300 bp (864 bp) retrieved in the cytoplasmic male sterile (CMS) mtDNA. Raw sequencing reads from MF and CMS accessions were mapped to atp6+ and atp6. (B) PCR profiles generated in two CMS commercial lines and their MF maintainers with specific primers for atp6+(left) and atp6 (right). (C) Protein alignment of atp6+, atp6, and the atp6 protein from Daucus carota (Dc_atp6).
Ijms 21 04664 g003
Figure 4. Evaluation of atp6+ (A), atp6 (B), atp1 (C), and atp9 (D) mRNA expression by qPCR analysis. Expression analysis were conducted on male fertile (MF, n = 4, red triangles) and male sterile samples (CMS, n = 4, blue squares). Four different tissues were evaluated for each gene: leaf (L), flower before anthesis (0% flowering, FBA), flower in half anthesis (50% flowering, FHA) and flower in full anthesis (100% flowering, FFA). Ct values were normalized for gapdh. Statistical significance was evaluated with unpaired Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05). All data are shown as mean ± SD.
Figure 4. Evaluation of atp6+ (A), atp6 (B), atp1 (C), and atp9 (D) mRNA expression by qPCR analysis. Expression analysis were conducted on male fertile (MF, n = 4, red triangles) and male sterile samples (CMS, n = 4, blue squares). Four different tissues were evaluated for each gene: leaf (L), flower before anthesis (0% flowering, FBA), flower in half anthesis (50% flowering, FHA) and flower in full anthesis (100% flowering, FFA). Ct values were normalized for gapdh. Statistical significance was evaluated with unpaired Student’s t-test (* p < 0.05). All data are shown as mean ± SD.
Ijms 21 04664 g004
Figure 5. Involvement of atp6 in cytoplasmic male sterility in fennel. The atp6+ gene duplication and transfer from the mtDNA to the nuclear genome is a recurrent and consistent feature of eukaryotic genome evolution that seems to have characterized also the evolutionary path of Foeniculum vulgare. Subsequently, a mitochondrial rearrangement event produced a truncation of 300 bp in the mtDNA atp6 copy (atp6) leading to a cytoplasmic male sterility phenotype. Expression analyses revealed that (i) atp6+ gene is constantly expressed in male fertile plants (MF), where it is available both in the mtDNA and, probably, in the nuclear DNA (ii) atp6+ gene is never expressed in male sterile plants, where is available only in the nuclear DNA (probably as pseudogene) (iii) atp6 is constantly expressed in male sterile plants (MF), where is available in the mtDNA.
Figure 5. Involvement of atp6 in cytoplasmic male sterility in fennel. The atp6+ gene duplication and transfer from the mtDNA to the nuclear genome is a recurrent and consistent feature of eukaryotic genome evolution that seems to have characterized also the evolutionary path of Foeniculum vulgare. Subsequently, a mitochondrial rearrangement event produced a truncation of 300 bp in the mtDNA atp6 copy (atp6) leading to a cytoplasmic male sterility phenotype. Expression analyses revealed that (i) atp6+ gene is constantly expressed in male fertile plants (MF), where it is available both in the mtDNA and, probably, in the nuclear DNA (ii) atp6+ gene is never expressed in male sterile plants, where is available only in the nuclear DNA (probably as pseudogene) (iii) atp6 is constantly expressed in male sterile plants (MF), where is available in the mtDNA.
Ijms 21 04664 g005
Table 1. Variant analysis results. Variant location in CMS mtDNA, variant type (Ins = Insertion, Del = Deletion, SNV = Single Nucleotide variant, MNV = Multiple Nucleotide Variant), reference allele (CMS), alternative allele (MF) and annotation (ID) are reported (bold indicates a variant located within the exon).
Table 1. Variant analysis results. Variant location in CMS mtDNA, variant type (Ins = Insertion, Del = Deletion, SNV = Single Nucleotide variant, MNV = Multiple Nucleotide Variant), reference allele (CMS), alternative allele (MF) and annotation (ID) are reported (bold indicates a variant located within the exon).
CMS mtDNA PositionTypeRefAltIDCMS mtDNA PositionTypeRefAltID
4407^4408Ins-T 210132SNVAGatp6
4413^4414Ins-T 210134..210137MNVACCCGGAAatp6
9932DelA- 210140..210141MNVCCTTatp6
9937DelA- 210143SNVAGatp6
17054SNVTA 210145SNVCTatp6
17779SNVAC 210148..210150MNVCGATAGatp6
19036DelT- 210152..210153MNVTAGGatp6
23779..23780DelGG-nad4 (intron)210155SNVTGatp6
26757^26758Ins-Gnad4 (intron)210157..210158MNVCTAGatp6
29433DelG-nad4 (intron)210160..210163MNVATATCCCCatp6
38972^38973Ins-A 210168..210171MNVGCTTATCCatp6
85033DelA- 210176SNVTCatp6
97184DelA- 210179SNVTAatp6
97194DelC- 210193..210194MNVAACCatp6
103048DelT- 210218SNVGTatp6
106177^106178Ins-T 210225SNVGCatp6
109983DelG- 210276SNVGAatp6
110419SNVTG 210291SNVTCatp6
175249SNVTCrps3210293SNVGAatp6
175458SNVCGrps3210296SNVTGatp6
176686SNVGArps3210374SNVCTatp6
181657DelT-cox2 (intron)212667DelT-
210097..210102DelCCGCTC-atp6213187SNVAG
210103..210105MNVCCATTTatp6213216SNVAC
210111SNVCTatp6238616^238617Ins-C
210113SNVGAatp6238643^238644Ins-G
210117SNVAGatp6240379^240380Ins-TTTATTATorf43
210117^210118Ins-AGatp6247260DelC-
210122SNVAGatp6248437DelA-
210124..210126MNVTAAGTGatp6293347DelT-nad2 (intron)
210129^210130Ins-CTTatp6295317DelT-nad2 (intron)
210130SNVATatp6

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palumbo, F.; Vitulo, N.; Vannozzi, A.; Magon, G.; Barcaccia, G. The Mitochondrial Genome Assembly of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) Reveals Two Different atp6 Gene Sequences in Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Accessions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134664

AMA Style

Palumbo F, Vitulo N, Vannozzi A, Magon G, Barcaccia G. The Mitochondrial Genome Assembly of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) Reveals Two Different atp6 Gene Sequences in Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Accessions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(13):4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134664

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palumbo, Fabio, Nicola Vitulo, Alessandro Vannozzi, Gabriele Magon, and Gianni Barcaccia. 2020. "The Mitochondrial Genome Assembly of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) Reveals Two Different atp6 Gene Sequences in Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Accessions" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 13: 4664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21134664

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop