Next Article in Journal
ER Stress is Involved in Epithelial-To-Mesenchymal Transition of Alveolar Epithelial Cells Exposed to a Hypoxic Microenvironment
Previous Article in Journal
The Inescapable Effects of Ribosomes on In-Cell NMR Spectroscopy and the Implications for Regulation of Biological Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms20061298
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Methoxsalen and Bergapten Prevent Diabetes-Induced Osteoporosis by the Suppression of Osteoclastogenic Gene Expression in Mice

by
Ju Ri Ham
1,
Ra-Yeong Choi
1,
Hae-In Lee
2 and
Mi-Kyung Lee
1,*
1
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea
2
Mokpo Marin Food-Industry Research Center, Mokpo 58621, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(6), 1298; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061298
Submission received: 25 January 2019 / Revised: 1 March 2019 / Accepted: 11 March 2019 / Published: 14 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pharmacology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study evaluated whether bergapten and methoxsalen could prevent diabetes-induced osteoporosis and its underlying mechanism. For 10 weeks, bergapten or methoxsalen (0.02%, w/w) was applied to diabetic mice that were provided with a high-fat diet and streptozotocin. Bone mineral density (BMD) and microarchitecture quality were significantly reduced in the diabetic control group; however, both bergapten and methoxsalen reversed serum osteocalcin, bone-alkaline phosphatase and femur BMD. These coumarin derivatives significantly increased bone volume density and trabecular number, whereas they decreased the structure model index of femur tissue in diabetic mice. Conversely, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP) staining revealed that these derivatives reduced osteoclast numbers and formation in diabetic bone tissue. Additionally, both bergapten and methoxsalen tended to downregulate the expression of osteoclast-related genes such as receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), nuclear of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) and TRAP in diabetic femurs, with NFATc1 and TRAP expression showing significant reductions. Our data suggest that both bergapten and methoxsalen prevent diabetic osteoporosis by suppressing bone resorption.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes and osteoporosis are increasing worldwide, and these conditions have led to high morbidity and mortality among the elderly [1]. Both type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been associated with decreased bone strength and increased risk of bone fractures [2]. Diabetes-related osteoporosis is a general metabolic bone disorder that increases the tendency for fractures due to osteopenia, microstructural changes in bone tissue, decreased bone strength and increased friability, which is one of the main complications of diabetes affecting the skeletal system [3]. The mechanisms linking DM to osteoporosis have not been fully explained, but insulin deficiency and dysfunction, obesity and hyperinsulinemia, altered levels of estrogen, leptin and adiponectin and DM-related complications may be associated with impaired bone metabolism and increased risk of fractures [1].
Furanocoumarins, which occur in various herbal and citrus extracts, possess antibacterial, antioxidant, immunomodulator, apoptotic and anticancer activities [4]. Bergapten (BP, 5-methoxypsoralen) and methoxsalen (MTS, 8-methoxypsoralen) (Figure 1), two important derivatives of furanocoumarin, are linear furanocoumarins found in natural foods such as celeriac, celery (fresh), lemon, parsley and parsnip [5,6,7,8,9,10]. After oral intake in both humans and animals, furanocoumarins can be absorbed rapidly in the gastrointestinal tract [11,12]. They are metabolized mainly via cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase in the liver and transformed by epoxidation, hydroxylation, glucuronide conjugation and the hydrolytic opening of the lactone ring [13,14]. BP and MTS bind to serum albumin [13,15]. BP binds to low-density lipoprotein in serum, while MTS has metabolic activation with subsequent covalent binding of metabolites to the microsomal protein [13]. The main excretion route is the kidney and 5–10% is excreted via feces [13].
BP is known as a natural anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor agent and it has been used to prevent lipopolysaccharide-mediated osteoclast formation, bone resorption and osteoclast survival in vitro [16]. Fang et al. [17] suggested BP as a new strategy for T2DM because it ameliorates insulin resistance by the ER (endoplasmic reticulum)-mediated PI3K/AKT activation pathway in HepG2 cells. BP prevented osteoporosis in high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance with osteoprotegerin (OPG) knockout mice by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT, JNK/MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways [3]. However, the effects of BP on hyperglycemia-induced osteoporosis are not yet understood. MTS is also a natural photoactive compound found in many plant seeds [18] and a structural isomer of BP, but its anti-osteoporotic function has been relatively less studied compared with BP. We would like to develop BP or MTS as a food ingredient or a food supplement for preventing DM-related osteoporosis. We recently showed the anti-osteoporotic activity of MTS in ovariectomized mice [19]. Therefore, this study was conducted to elucidate the anti-osteoporotic ability of BP and MTS in high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice.

2. Results

2.1. The Effects of BP and MTS on General Characteristics in Diabetic Mice

Body weight, serum insulin and adiponectin levels in DM decreased compared with the non-diabetic (NC) group, whereas blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels increased (Table 1). Both BP and MTS did not affect these general characteristics of diabetes (Table 1). Serum calcium (Ca) and inorganic phosphorus (IP) concentrations were significantly lower in DM than in the NC. However, BP significantly increased the IP content and MTS slightly recovered it compared with the DM group (Table 1).

2.2. The Effects of BP and MTS on Serum Osteoblast and Osteoclast Markers in Diabetic Mice

Serum bone-alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OCN) levels were significantly lower in the DM group than in the NC group. However, both BP and MTS significantly increased OCN levels by 3.4- and 2.5-fold, respectively, when compared with the DM group (Figure 2a). Bone-ALP levels were also significantly higher in the BP (2.1-fold) and MTS (2.6-fold) supplementation groups than those of the DM group (Figure 2b). Thus, BP is more efficient in increasing the OCN, whereas MTS is more effective on the bone-ALP level in DM-induced osteoporotic mice. The serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP) concentration was significantly reduced in both the BP and MTS groups compared to the DM group (Figure 2c).

2.3. The Effects of BP and MTS on Bone Microarchitecture and Histology in Diabetic Mice

Femur length did not differ between experimental groups (Table 2). Femur weights were significantly lower in the DM group than the NC group; however, BP significantly increased femur weight whereas MTS supplementation increased femur weight slightly when compared to the DM group (Table 2). Neither the length nor weight of tibia differed among groups (Table 2).
Hyperglycemia significantly decreased femoral bone mineral density (BMD), but both BP and MTS similarly reversed the bone loss. BP also significantly increased the tibial BMD compared to the DM group and showed a slight increase compared with NC and MTS groups (Figure 3a,b). Moreover, DM altered both femoral and tibial trabecular architecture, demonstrating that bone volume density (BV/TV) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) were significantly decreased and that structure model index (SMI) was increased in the DM group as compared with the NC group (Table 2). Both BP and MTS similarly increased femoral BV/TV, trabecular number (Tb.N) and Tb.Th, whereas they decreased SMI in diabetic mice. Tibial BV/TV, Tb.Th and SMI also recovered in response to BP supplementation, while MTS only increased Tb.Th compared to the DM group. Trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) in both femur and tibia did not differ among groups (Table 2).
Upon hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, both BP and MTS were determined analogously to augment the thickness and volume relative to the DM group (Figure 3c). On the other hand, TRAP staining, one of the bone resorption markers, revealed that BP and MTS reduced osteoclast numbers and formation in diabetic bone tissue (Figure 3d).

2.4. The Effects of BP and MTS on Bone Metabolism-Related Gene Expression in Diabetic Mice

To identify the effects of BP and MTS supplementation on bone remodeling, we examined the Wnt pathway, osteoblast and osteoclast-related femoral mRNA expression. DM increased the gene expression of beta-catenin (β-catenin), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), OPG, nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) and TRAP as well as decreased that of osterix (OSX) and OCN compared with the NC group (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Both BP and MTS significantly downregulated glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β), β-catenin, RUNX2, OPG, NFATc1 and TRAP gene expression compared to DM (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) was also greatly down-regulated by both BP and MTS, but these differences were not significant (Figure 5). BP and MTS showed similar effects on the changes in gene expression.

3. Discussion

The present study was the first to demonstrate that both MTS and BP supplementation at 0.02% (w/w) similarly protected against diabetes-induced osteoporosis in mice, which was demonstrated by increased BMD and bone quality. Osteoporosis has a multifactorial etiology and can be postmenopausal, senile or diabetic, and it is characterized by reduced bone mass and poor bone quality, resulting in decreased bone strength with an increased risk of fractures [20,21]. The osteoporotic mechanism in all cases is an imbalance between bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts, which leads to a decreased BMD [20,22]. Diabetic osteopathy is characterized by microarchitectural changes that decrease the bone quality, leading to increased bone fractures in both types of DM [20,23,24]. Previous studies reported that BMD is lower in T1DM, whereas it was normal, low or even high in T2DM relative to that of healthy people [25,26]. In this study, T2DM was induced by combining an HFD (40% kcal from fat) for 4 weeks, which produced insulin resistance, with STZ injection, which caused initial β-cell dysfunction [27]. This model is known to closely mimic not only the phenotype, but also the pathogenesis of human T2DM [28,29]. Since microarchitecture is essential to assessment of bone mechanical properties [30], we conducted quantitative micro-computed tomography (µCT) analysis of the trabecular bone microarchitecture. The results showed that diabetes caused a marked decrease in trabecular BMD, BV/TV, Tb.Th and Tb.N, as well as an increase in SMI that is similar to the changes in estrogen-deficient mice [19]. However, both BP and MTS reversed these changes effectively. Thus, BP and MTS significantly improved the BMD and microarchitecture of trabecular bone in diabetic mice.
OCN, one of the bone formation markers, decreased in DM patients and was inversely correlated with glucose levels [31,32]. Preclinical studies have suggested that OCN stimulates insulin secretion, enhancing energy expenditure and increasing the expression of adiponectin and thus tissue insulin sensitivity [33,34]. In the current study, both BP and MTS significantly elevated the serum OCN and bone-ALP levels that were lowered by diabetes; however, they did not affect blood glucose, HbA1c or serum insulin level when compared to the DM group. These results indicate that the action of BP and MTS on bone loss in diabetic mice may be independent of the regulation of blood glucose level.
To identify how BP and MTS can alleviate diabetes-induced bone loss, we determined their effects on bone metabolism using femur tissue. To maintain bone volume and quality, the differentiation of osteoclasts and osteoblasts is tightly regulated through communication between and within these two cell lineages [35]. The Wnt pathway inhibits osteoclastogenesis by inducing OPG and suppresses bone resorption by an OPG-independent mechanism acting directly on osteoclast precursors [36]. Interestingly, the present study showed that the expression of some critical osteogenesis-related genes in the BP and MTS groups, such as β-catenin, RUNX2 and OPG, were close to the values of the NC group, whereas the expression of these genes in the DM group was significantly increased relative to the NC group, indicating that their expression could, in part, be a compensatory response to hyperglycemia-related bone loss under DM. Kiechl et al. [37] reported that OPG concentration was not elevated prior to T2DM onset, but that it increased after disease occurrence in subjects with diabetes, which was consistent with our findings. In addition, we found that ALP gene expression in femur tissues was similar to changes in the RUNX2 gene. A previous study reported that since RUNX2 directly binds to the ALP intron 1, ALP is tightly regulated by RUNX2 [38]. However, we found no obvious alterations in OSX and OCN expression in either the BP or MTS group. Thus, the effects of BP and MTS on gene expressions of osteoblast activity under hyperglycemia was not fully elucidated in this study.
A previous study reported that hyperglycemia elevated RANKL expression, which aggregated osteoclast absorption and osteoporosis [39]. Herein, we found that, although there was no statistical significance, RANKL gene expression in DM was 4.2-fold higher than that in the NC group, which was suppressed by BP or MTS supplementation. RANKL selectively induces NFATc1 expression, which is a master switch for regulating the terminal differentiation of osteoclasts [40]. Therefore, the RANKL pathway has been recognized as an effective therapeutic strategy against diabetic osteoporosis [41]. NFATc1 plays a pivotal role in osteoclast fusion and osteoclast activation via the upregulation of various genes responsible for osteoclast adhesion, migration and acidification as well as the degradation of inorganic and organic bone matrix [42]. Our results showed that both BP and MTS significantly downregulated NFATc1 and TRAP gene expressions in diabetic mice. The activation of NFATc1 induces the transcription of osteoclast-specific genes such as TRAP, matrix metallopepetidase-9 (MMP-9), osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR) and cathepsin-K [43,44]. TRAP activity is a marker often used for identifying osteoclasts [45]; therefore, we carried out femoral TRAP staining. The current study confirmed that femoral TRAP staining in the DM group was increased relative to the NC group; however, both BP and MTS effectively recovered TRAP staining, which resulted in decreased serum TRAP levels in these groups compared with the DM group. Taken together, our data suggest that both BP and MTS inhibit osteoclastogenesis via the suppression of NFATc1 and TRAP activation rather than the regulation of osteoblastogenesis in diabetic mice. Thus, BP and MTS could be applicable as a new food supplement or pharmacological agent for the prevention of osteoporosis in diabetics; however, their efficacy and safety need to be supported by clinical trials.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Bergapten and methoxsalen (purity > 98%) were purchased from TCI (Tokyo, Japan). STZ was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Many kits were purchased; serum bone-ALP and OCN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits from Elabscience (Wuhan, China), a TRAP ELISA kit from Cusabio Biotech (Wuhan, China), an insulin kit from Morinaga Institute of Biological Science, Inc. (Yokohama, Japan) and an adiponectin kit from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). TRIzol reagent, ReverTra Ace qPCR RT master mix and SYBR green PCR kit were acquired from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA), Toyobo (Osaka, Japan) and Qiagen (Hilden, Germany), respectively.

4.2. Animals

Four-week-old C57BL/6N mice were purchased from Orient Bio Inc. (Seongnam, Korea). The mice were individually housed in polycarbonate cages and kept in a temperature and humidity-controlled environment (22 ± 2 °C, 50 ± 5% humidity) under a 12/12-h light/dark cycle. All experimental protocols involving the use of animals were conducted in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sunchon National University’s guidelines (approval number, SCNU IACUC-2016-11, approval date: 17 November 2016). Mice were fed a pelletized commercial chow diet for 1 week after arrival, then randomly divided into non-diabetic (n = 8) and diabetic (n = 30) groups. Non-diabetic (NC) mice were fed a normal diet (11% calories from fat) and diabetic mice were fed an HFD (40% calories from fat) for 4 weeks, and then injected with STZ (100 mg/kg body weight in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH 4.2) into the peritoneum on two consecutive days. After 7 days, only STZ-treated mice that exhibited a fasting blood glucose level ≥13.9 mmol/L were used in the study. Diabetic mice were randomly divided into three groups of eight mice each—an untreated diabetic (DM control) group, a diabetic-bergapten (DM + BP) group and a diabetic-methoxsalen (DM + MTS) group. The non-diabetic mice were fed a normal diet, and diabetic mice were fed an HFD for 10 weeks. In the present study, both BP and MTS were added to the HFD diet at 0.02%, which was based on our previous study [19]. The results demonstrated that 0.02% MTS supplementation effectively increased BMD and decreased osteoclast numbers and formation in femur tissues of ovariectomized mice. Body weight was measured weekly and food consumption was measured daily. After 10 weeks, all the experimental mice were fasted overnight and then anesthetized with ether. Whole blood samples were gained from the inferior vena cava under anesthesia conditions and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C to obtain serum for biomarker analysis.

4.3. Bone Microarchitecture Analysis Using Micro-Computed Tomography (µCT)

The femur and tibia of all mice were obtained, removed and cleaned of adherent soft tissues. They were soaked and stored in 70% ethyl alcohol solution until the scanning. Femoral and tibial lengths were determined using a Vernier caliper (Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan).
The femur and tibia of each mouse were wrapped in plastic wrap to avoid drying and placed in a sample holder. We scanned each femur and tibia using a Skyscan 1272 µCT system (Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) under the following scanning conditions and parameters: 70 kV, 142 µA, 0.5 mm aluminum filter, 26.5 µm resolution, rotation step of 0.4° and triple frame averaging. The reconstruction of the projection images was performed in NRecon software (Bruker, Belgium). The CTAn program (version 1.16.4.1, Bruker, Belgium) was used to quantitatively analyze the data of BMD, BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp and SMI. The BMD is a representative bone density parameter. BV/TV, a bone volume fraction, independently suggests how much mineral fill exists in the bone tissue. Tb.N means the average number of trabeculae per unit length. Tb.Th and Tb.Sp define the mean thickness of the trabeculae and mean distance between the trabeculae, respectively. SMI is an indicator of the structure of the trabecular, indicating where it is plate or rod-like [46].

4.4. Histological Analysis of Bone Tissue

The distal metaphysis of each femur and tibia was fixed in 10% formaldehyde buffer at 4 °C for histological measurement. The fixed samples were decalcified with 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer. The decalcified samples were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 3–5 μm, then stained with H&E and TRAP. The stained areas were viewed using an optical microscope at 200× magnification.

4.5. Biochemical Analysis

The fasting blood glucose concentration was monitored using a glucometer (G-doctor, AllMedicus, Co., Ltd., Anyang, Korea) to test venous blood drawn from the tail vein every week after a 6-h fast. The HbA1c concentration in whole blood was measured using a NycoCard Reader II (Alere/Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway). The insulin and adiponectin levels were determined using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay kit. Serum bone-ALP, OCN and TRAP levels were measured using mouse ELISA kits. Serum Ca and IP levels were determined using an automated blood analyzer (Dri-Chem 3500i: Fujifilm Medical System Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

4.6. Real-Time PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the femur tissues with TriZol reagent following the manufacturer’s protocols. One microgram of the total RNA was then converted to cDNA using a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT master mix. Next, mRNA expression was measured by RT-qPCR (real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction) using a SYBR green PCR kit and the CFX96TM real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The primers used were as follows: ALP: forward GTTGCCAAGCTGGGAAGAACAC and reverse CCCACCCCGCTATTCCAAAC; β-catenin: forward CAGTGCAGGAGGCCGAG and reverse TCAGGTCAGCTTGAGTAGCC; GSK3β: forward TTGGACAAAGGTCTTCCGGC and reverse GGTCCCGCAATTCATCGAAA; LRP5: forward GGAGTTCTCAGCCCATCCTT and reverse GTAGGAGGCTCACCACAAGT; NFATc1: forward AGGACCCGGAGTTCGACTT and reverse GTCGAGGTGACACTAGGGGA; OCN: forward TTTCTGCTCACTCTGCTGACC and reverse CGCCGGAGTCTGTTCACTAC; OPG: forward GCCACGCAAAAGTGTGGAAT and reverse TTTGGTCCCAGGCAAACTGT; OSX: forward CACCCATTGCCAGTAATCTTCAA and reverse ATAGTGAGCTTCTTCCTGGGTA; RANKL: forward CGAGGAAGGGAGAGAACGAT and reverse AGGTACTTGCCGTAGTCTCG; RUNX2: forward TACAACTAAAACAGGGACTGGGT and reverse AGGCTGTTTGACGCCATAGT; TRAP: forward AGGAAGAGCCTTCAAGTAAGTG and reverse CCACCCATGAATCCATCTTCT; WNT10A: forward CGAGGTTTTCGAGAGAGTGC and reverse TTCAGTTTACCCAGAGCGCA; beta-actin (β-actin): forward GATCAGCAAGCAGGAGTACGA and reverse GGTGTAAAACGCAGCTCAGTAAC. All of the gene expressions were relatively normalized against the β-actin gene.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as the means ± standard error (S.E.). SPSS software was used to analyze all statistical tests (Chicago, IL, USA). Statistically significant differences among the groups were determined by one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple-range test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

Both BP and MTS attenuated diabetes-induced osteoporosis via the downregulation of osteoclastic metabolism in mice, but they did not improve hyperglycemia when applied at 0.02% in the diet. Based on these results, BP and MTS can be used in combination with anti-hyperglycemic agents to improve osteoporosis in individuals with diabetes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.R.H., R.-Y.C., H.-I.L. and M.-K.L.; Data curation, J.R.H.; Formal analysis, J.R.H., R.-Y.C. and M.-K.L.; Investigation, J.R.H. and R.-Y.C.; Methodology, J.R.H.; Supervision, M.-K.L.; Writing—original draft, J.R.H. and M.-K.L.; Writing—review and editing, H.-I.L. and M.-K.L.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. NRF-2015R1C1A2A01052146).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Russo, G.T.; Giandalia, A.; Romeo, E.L.; Nunziata, M.; Muscianisi, M.; Ruffo, M.C.; Catalano, A.; Cucinotta, D. Fracture risk in type 2 diabetes: Current perspectives and gender differences. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 2016, 1615735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Poiana, C.; Capatina, C. Fracture risk assessment in patients with diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Densitom. 2017, 20, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, X.; Zhu, Z.; Han, S.; Zhang, Z. Bergapten exerts inhibitory effects on diabetes-related osteoporosis via the regulation of the PI3K/AKT, JNK/MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways in osteoprotegerin knockout mice. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 38, 1661–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mirzaei, S.A.; Dehkordi, N.G.; Ghamghami, M.; Amiri, A.H.; Abdolahinia, E.D.; Elahian, F. ABC-transporter blockage mediated by xanthotoxin and bergapten is the major pathway for chemosensitization of multidrug-resistant cancer cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2017, 337, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Radziejewska-Kubzdela, E.; Czapski, J.; Czaczyk, K.; Biegańska-Marecik, R. The effect of pre-treatment and modified atmosphere packaging on contents of phenolic compounds and sensory and microbiological quality of shredded celeriac. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 1140–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Melough, M.M.; Lee, S.G.; Cho, E.; Kim, K.; Provatas, A.A.; Perkins, C.; Park, M.K.; Qureshi, A.; Chun, O.K. Identification and quantitation of furocoumarins in popularly consumed foods in the US Using QuEChERS extraction coupled with UPLC-MS/MS analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5049–5055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chaudhary, S.K.; Ceska, O.; Warrington, P.J.; Ashwood-Smith, M.J. Increased furocoumarin content of celery during storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1985, 33, 1153–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Surico, G.; Varvaro, L.; Solfrizzo, M. Linear furocoumarin accumulation in celery plants infected with Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1987, 35, 406–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tisserand, R.; Young, R. Essential oil profiles. In Essential Oil Safety, 2nd ed.; Tisserand, R., Young, R., Eds.; Churchill Livingstone: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2014; pp. 187–482. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ostertag, E.; Becker, T.; Ammon, J.; Bauer-Aymanns, H.; Schrenk, D. Effects of storage conditions on furocoumarin levels in intact, chopped, or homogenized parsnips. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2565–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Melough, M.M.; Cho, E.; Chun, O.K. Furocoumarins: A review of biochemical activities, dietary sources and intake, and potential health risks. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 113, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Muni, I.A.; Scheneider, F.H.; Olsson, T.A.; King, M. Absorption, distribution, and excretion of 8-methoxypsoralen in HRA/skh mice. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 1984, 66, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  13. Eisenbrand, G. Toxicological assessment of furanocoumarin in foodstuffs. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bickers, D.R.; Pathak, M.A. Psoralen pharmacology: Studies on metabolism and enzyme induction. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 1984, 66, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  15. Artuc, M.; Stuettgen, G.; Schalla, W.; Schaefer, H.; Gazith, J. Reversible binding of 5- and 8-methoxypsoralen to human serum proteins (albumin) and to epidermis in vitro. Br. J. Dermatol. 1979, 101, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zheng, M.; Ge, Y.; Li, H.; Yan, M.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y. Bergapten prevents lipopolysaccharide mediated osteoclast formation, bone resorption and osteoclast survival. Int. Orthop. 2014, 38, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fang, K.; Dong, H.; Jiang, S.; Li, F.; Wang, D.; Yang, D.; Gong, J.; Huang, W.; Lu, F. Diosgenin and 5-methoxypsoralen ameliorate insulin resistance through ER-α/PI3K/Akt-signaling pathways in HepG2 cells. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 2016, 7493694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, Y.C.; Chou, C.T.; Liang, W.Z.; Kuo, C.C.; Hsu, S.S.; Wang, J.L.; Jan, C.R. Effect of methoxsalen on Ca2+ homeostasis and viability in human osteosarcoma cells. Chin. J. Physiol. 2017, 60, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ham, J.R.; Choi, R.; Yee, S.; Hwang, Y.; Kim, M.; Lee, M. Methoxsalen supplementation attenuates bone loss and inflammatory response in ovariectomized mice. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2017, 278, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jackuliak, P.; Payer, J. Osteoporosis, fractures, and diabetes. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2014, 2014, 820615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and therapy. JAMA 2001, 285, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johansson, H.; Kanis, J.A.; Oden, A.; Johnell, O.; McCloskey, E. BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos. Int. 2009, 20, 1675–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nyman, J.S.; Even, J.L.; Jo, C.; Herbert, E.G.; Murry, M.M.; Cockrell, G.E.; Wahl, E.C.; Bunn, R.C.; Lumpkin, C.K., Jr.; Fowlkes, J.L.; et al. Increasing duration of type 1 diabetes pertubs the strength-structure relationship and increase brittleness of bone. Bone 2011, 48, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thrailkill, K.M.; Lumpkin C.K., Jr.; Bunn, R.C.; Kemp, S.F.; Fowlkes, J.L. Is insulin an anabolic agent in bone? Dissecting the diabetic bone for clues. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 289, E735–E745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Napoli, N.; Chandran, M.; Pierroz, D.D.; Abrahamsen, B.; Schwartz, A.V.; Ferrari, S.L. Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Raska, I., Jr.; Rasková, M.; Zikán, V.; Skrha, J. Body composition is associated with bone and glucose metabolism in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Physiol. Res. 2017, 66, 99–111. [Google Scholar]
  27. Srinivasan, K.; Viswanad, B.; Asrat, L.; Kaul, C.; Ramarao, P. Combination of high-fat diet-fed and low-dose streptozotocin-treated rat: A model for type 2 diabetes and pharmacological screening. Pharmacol. Res. 2005, 52, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Reed, M.J.; Meszaros, K.; Entes, L.J.; Claypool, M.D.; Pinkett, J.G.; Gadbois, T.M.; Reaven, G.M. A new rat model of type 2 diabetes: The fat-fed, streptozotocin-treated rat. Metab.-Clin. Exp. 2000, 49, 1390–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Asrafuzzaman, M.; Cao, Y.; Afroz, R.; Kamato, D.; Gray, S.; Little, P.J. Animal models for assessing the impact of natural products on the aetiology and metabolic pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 1242–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dalle Carbonare, L.; Giannini, S. Bone microarchitecture as an important determinant of bone strength. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2004, 27, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rubin, M.R. Bone cells and bone turnover in diabetes mellitus. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2015, 13, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rosen, C.J.; Chesnut, C.H., III; Mallinak, N.J. The predictive value of biochemical markers of bone turnover for bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women treated with hormone replacement or calcium supplementation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 1904–1910. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferron, M.; Hinoi, E.; Karsenty, G.; Ducy, P. Osteocalcin differentially regulates beta cell and adipocyte gene expression and affects the development of metabolic diseases in wild-type mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 5266–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, N.K.; Sowa, H.; Hinoi, E.; Ferron, M.; Ahn, J.D.; Confavreux, C.; Dacquin, R.; Mee, P.J.; McKee, M.D.; Jung, D.Y. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism by the skeleton. Cell 2007, 130, 456–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Irie, N.; Takada, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Matsuzaki, Y.; Naruse, C.; Asano, M.; Iwakura, Y.; Suda, T.; Matsuo, K. Bidirectional signaling through ephrinA2-EphA2 enhances osteoclastogenesis and suppresses osteoblastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 14637–14644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sanches, C.P.; Vianna, A.G.D.; de Carvalho Barreto, F. The impact of type 2 diabetes on bone metabolism. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2017, 9, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kiechl, S.; Wittmann, J.; Giaccari, A.; Knoflach, M.; Willeit, P.; Bozec, A.; Moschen, A.R.; Muscogiuri, G.; Sorice, G.P.; Kireva, T. Blockade of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANKL) signaling improves hepatic insulin resistance and prevents development of diabetes mellitus. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Léotoing, L.; Davicco, M.; Lebecque, P.; Wittrant, Y.; Coxam, V. The flavonoid fisetin promotes osteoblasts differentiation through Runx2 transcriptional activity. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 1239–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hsieh, T.; Sheu, S.; Sun, J.; Chen, M. Icariin inhibits osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption by suppression of MAPKs/NF-κB regulated HIF-1α and PGE2 synthesis. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Takayanagi, H.; Kim, S.; Koga, T.; Nishina, H.; Isshiki, M.; Yoshida, H.; Saiura, A.; Isobe, M.; Yokochi, T.; Inoue, J. Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev. Cell 2002, 3, 889–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, C.; Guo, X.; Yao, W.; Zhang, C. Cereblon (CRBN) deletion reverses streptozotocin induced diabetic osteoporosis in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 496, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xia, G.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Xue, C. Phosphorylated peptides from Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) prevent estrogen deficiency induced osteoporosis by inhibiting bone resorption in ovariectomized rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 9550–9557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Teitelbaum, S.L. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 2000, 289, 1504–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sundaram, K.; Nishimura, R.; Senn, J.; Youssef, R.F.; London, S.D.; Reddy, S.V. RANK ligand signaling modulates the matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene expression during osteoclast differentiation. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Walsh, N.C.; Cahill, M.; Carninci, P.; Kawai, J.; Okazaki, Y.; Hayashizaki, Y.; Hume, D.A.; Cassady, A.I. Multiple tissue-specific promoters control expression of the murine tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase gene. Gene 2003, 307, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bouxsein, M.L.; Boyd, S.K.; Christiansen, B.A.; Guldberg, R.E.; Jepsen, K.J.; Muller, R. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010, 25, 1468–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 20 01298 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of bergapten and methoxsalen.
Figure 1. Structures of bergapten and methoxsalen.
Ijms 20 01298 g001
Ijms 20 01298 g002 550
Figure 2. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on serum osteocalcin (OCN) (a); bone- alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (b) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP) (c) in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). ab Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Figure 2. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on serum osteocalcin (OCN) (a); bone- alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (b) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP) (c) in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). ab Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Ijms 20 01298 g002
Ijms 20 01298 g003 550
Figure 3. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) (a); bone micro-computed tomography (μCT) image (b); bone hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining (c) and bone tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP)staining (d) in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). ab Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). Magnification 200×; red arrows indicate osteoclasts. NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Figure 3. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on bone mineral density (BMD) (a); bone micro-computed tomography (μCT) image (b); bone hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining (c) and bone tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5 (TRAP)staining (d) in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). ab Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). Magnification 200×; red arrows indicate osteoclasts. NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Ijms 20 01298 g003
Ijms 20 01298 g004 550
Figure 4. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on the femur Wnt pathway (a) and femur osteoblast (b)-related gene expression in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). abc Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Figure 4. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on the femur Wnt pathway (a) and femur osteoblast (b)-related gene expression in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). abc Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Ijms 20 01298 g004
Ijms 20 01298 g005 550
Figure 5. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on the femur osteoclast-related gene expression in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). abc Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Figure 5. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on the femur osteoclast-related gene expression in diabetic mice. Values are expressed as the means ± S.E. (n = 8). abc Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Ijms 20 01298 g005
Table
Table 1. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on general characteristics in diabetic mice.
Table 1. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on general characteristics in diabetic mice.
NCDMDM+BPDM+MTS
Initial body weight (g)26.31 ± 0.4126.33 ± 0.4826.22 ± 0.5026.68 ± 0.36
Final body weight (g)33.10 ± 0.97 b24.76 ± 0.48 a25.79 ± 0.81 a25.74 ± 1.31 a
Blood glucose (mmol/L)9.96 ± 0.29 a27.07 ± 0.98 b27.22 ± 1.37 b28.05 ± 1.11 b
HbA1C (%)4.31 ± 0.08 a9.64 ± 0.58 b9.22 ± 0.60 b9.43 ± 0.29 b
Serum
Insulin (pg/mL)742.72 ± 87.26 b322.78 ± 22.80 a536.85 ± 92.75 ab384.31 ± 49.03 a
Adiponectin (μg/mL)0.93 ± 0.02 b0.69 ± 0.02 a0.66 ± 0.03 a0.67 ± 0.06 a
Ca (U/L)8.55 ± 0.21 b7.57 ± 0.30 a7.72 ± 0.25 a7.75 ± 0.11 a
IP (U/L)9.01 ± 0.52 c5.32 ± 0.45 a6.98 ± 0.53 b6.06 ± 0.33 ab
Values are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 8). abc Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; Ca, calcium; IP, inorganic phosphorus; NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.
Table
Table 2. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on bone morphometry and microstructure parameters in diabetic mice.
Table 2. The effects of bergapten or methoxsalen supplementation on bone morphometry and microstructure parameters in diabetic mice.
NCDMDM+BPDM + MTS
Femoral morphometry
Length (mm)15.63 ± 0.1115.37 ± 0.1615.58 ± 0.3515.17 ± 0.21
Weight (mg)83.89 ± 1.57 b73.11 ± 3.48 a81.57 ± 3.07 b80.35 ± 1.93 ab
Femoral trabecular bone microstructures
BV/TV (%)32.00 ± 2.59 b19.63 ± 2.34 a30.14 ± 1.93 b26.90 ± 1.70 b
Tb.N (mm−1)2.55 ± 0.13 b1.81 ± 0.17 a2.51 ± 0.16 b2.44 ± 0.09 b
Tb.Th (μm)124.17 ± 3.75 c107.10 ± 2.73 a120.64 ± 4.40 bc109.79 ± 4.50 ab
Tb.Sp (μm)223.76 ± 9.69262.87 ± 15.97237.70 ± 20.27254.00 ± 14.10
SMI2.02 ± 0.10 a2.39 ± 0.08 b1.98 ± 0.09 a1.99 ± 0.06 a
Tibial morphometry
Length (mm)18.16 ± 0.1318.07 ± 0.1018.21 ± 0.0818.28 ± 0.34
Weight (mg)60.04 ± 1.6155.50 ± 1.3460.36 ± 2.8259.47 ± 1.85
Tibial trabecular bone microstructures
BV/TV (%)31.26 ± 2.52 bc20.82 ± 2.88 a34.57 ± 3.17 c24.66 ± 3.10 ab
Tb.N (mm−1)2.67 ± 0.132.12 ± 0.222.77 ± 0.222.15 ± 0.17
Tb.Th (μm)116.12 ± 4.44 b96.43 ± 3.90 a123.77 ± 3.30 b112.52 ± 8.36 b
Tb.Sp (μm)222.28 ± 7.68234.95 ± 13.08218.12 ± 19.93246.71 ± 10.74
SMI2.19 ± 0.11 ab2.41 ± 0.10 b1.96 ± 0.14 a2.37 ± 0.05 b
Values are expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 8). abc Different letters indicate significant differences among experimental groups (p < 0.05). BV/TV, bone volume density; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; SMI, structure model index; NC, normal control group; DM, diabetic control group; DM+BP, diabetic-bergapten group; DM+MTS, diabetic-methoxsalen group.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ham, J.R.; Choi, R.-Y.; Lee, H.-I.; Lee, M.-K. Methoxsalen and Bergapten Prevent Diabetes-Induced Osteoporosis by the Suppression of Osteoclastogenic Gene Expression in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061298

AMA Style

Ham JR, Choi R-Y, Lee H-I, Lee M-K. Methoxsalen and Bergapten Prevent Diabetes-Induced Osteoporosis by the Suppression of Osteoclastogenic Gene Expression in Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(6):1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ham, Ju Ri, Ra-Yeong Choi, Hae-In Lee, and Mi-Kyung Lee. 2019. "Methoxsalen and Bergapten Prevent Diabetes-Induced Osteoporosis by the Suppression of Osteoclastogenic Gene Expression in Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 6: 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop