Next Article in Journal
Correction: Yan Chen, et al. Dual Agent Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles Enhanced Antitumor Activity in a Multidrug-Resistant Breast Tumor Eenograft Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2761–2772.
Previous Article in Journal
Is Upregulation of Aquaporin 4-M1 Isoform Responsible for the Loss of Typical Orthogonal Arrays of Particles in Astrocytomas?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Interactions of Aquaporins and Mineral Nutrients in Higher Plants

1
Jiangsu Key Lab for Organic Waste Utilization, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Institut des Sciences de la Vie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve B-1348, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(8), 1229; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081229
Submission received: 16 May 2016 / Revised: 21 July 2016 / Accepted: 26 July 2016 / Published: 29 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
Aquaporins, major intrinsic proteins (MIPs) present in the plasma and intracellular membranes, facilitate the transport of small neutral molecules across cell membranes in higher plants. Recently, progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of aquaporin subcellular localization, transport selectivity, and gating properties. Although the role of aquaporins in maintaining the plant water status has been addressed, the interactions between plant aquaporins and mineral nutrients remain largely unknown. This review highlights the roles of various aquaporin orthologues in mineral nutrient uptake and transport, as well as the regulatory effects of mineral nutrients on aquaporin expression and activity, and an integrated link between aquaporins and mineral nutrient metabolism was identified.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aquaporins, small integral proteins that belong to the ancient family of major intrinsic proteins (MIPs), have been found in all kingdoms of life. In plants, aquaporins reside in the plasma membrane and tonoplast and play important roles in plant water relations by facilitating the transport of water across biological membranes and regulating osmotic potential and hydraulic conductivity [1,2]. The regulatory roles of aquaporins in cellular water transport have been reported in previous studies [3,4,5,6]. In general, the molecular mechanisms of water transport across plasma membranes regulated by aquaporins are mainly attributed to co-translational and post-translational modification, aquaporin gating, and tetramer assembly and cellular trafficking of plasma membrane intrinsic proteins [1,4].
Based on amino acid sequence similarities, aquaporins are classified into seven subfamilies. The plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) and the tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) are the most abundant aquaporins in the plasma membrane and tonoplast, respectively [3,4]. The nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs), are located in the peribacteroid membrane of nitrogen-fixing symbiotic root nodules of leguminous plants and are also present in the plasma membrane of other species [7]. The small basic intrinsic proteins (SIPs) are small proteins mainly localized in the ER membrane [8], and the uncharacterized X intrinsic proteins (XIPs) are plasma membrane aquaporins that function in the transport of uncharged substrates [9]. The hybrid intrinsic proteins (HIPs) and the glycerol facilitator (GlpF)-like intrinsic proteins (GIPs) are present exclusively in moss [10]. The large number of plant aquaporins has been explained by their importance in regulating plant metabolic processes under various physiological states and environmental conditions [11]. For example, aquaporins are essential for plant defence responses against biotic and abiotic stresses, such as drought [12], salt stress [13,14], cold [15,16], nutrient deprivation [17], heavy metals [18,19], and pathogen infection [20,21]. Aquaporins play complex integrated roles in the response to different environmental stressors and are involved in plant growth and metabolic processes. PIPs and TIPs are involved in drought, salt, and cold stress through hydraulic conductivity and transpiration regulation, while TIPs and NIPs are involved in biotic stress, predominantly nutrient homeostasis between pathogens and host plants [22].
Mineral nutrients, which are usually present in the soil solution in organic and inorganic forms, are essential for plant growth and production. Physiological analysis indicated that ion uptake was regulated by transporters in the root plasma membranes, and there is a strong interaction between mineral nutrients and water status in which mineral nutrient uptake is accompanied by water absorption. In addition to facilitating water diffusion, a number of aquaporins have also been shown to transport other small neutral molecules, such as urea [23,24], ammonia (NH3) [25,26], carbon dioxide (CO2) [27,28,29], boric acid [17,30,31], silicic acid [32,33,34], lactic acid [35], hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [9,36,37,38], and other molecules with physiological significance [39]. Aquaporin trafficking and their subcellular relocalization act as a critical point for regulating the internal redistribution of mineral nutrients by transporting them from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the plasma membrane via the Golgi apparatus, as well as undergoing repeated cycles of endocytosis and recycling through the early endosome to the multivesicular body/prevacuolar compartments before eventually being targeted to the vacuole [4]. However, the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the interactions of aquaporin and mineral nutrients should be further investigated. In this review, the role of aquaporins in maintaining the plant water and mineral nutrient status is discussed, and the cellular aspects of plant aquaporin functions and regulation of mineral nutrients are also extensively reviewed.

2. Nitrogen (N)

Nitrogen (N), one of the most important mineral nutrients in higher plants, is involved in plant metabolism as a constituent of amino acids, proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, chlorophyll, co-enzymes, phytohormones, and secondary metabolites [40,41]. The interaction between aquaporins and N assimilation was first identified following the observation that the expression of several aquaporin genes responded to different N sources, such as AtTIP2;1, which was up-regulated by N starvation or NH4+ supply [26], while both PtdPIP1;2 and PtdSIP1;2 were down-regulated under high N fertilization levels [42]. Aquaporins have been suggested to be involved in water transport in response to nitrogen availability [42,43,44]. In our previous study, a high N (mixture of NH4+ and NO3) supply enhanced aquaporin (AQP) expression and decreased root aerenchyma and lignin, resulting in a high water absorption rate [44], which was consistent with results that show that high N supply increases root hydraulic conductivity and AQP expression in rice plants [43]. The possible mechanisms of aquaporin regulated hydraulic conductivity in response to N availability may be attributed to the changes in aquaporin abundance and activity [43]. Aquaporins play an important role in N absorption, mobilization, and detoxification, as well as other nitrogen metabolic processes in higher plants [23]. The PIP, NIP, and TIP subfamilies have been shown to transport N compounds, including ammonia and urea [23,24].

2.1. Nitrate

Nitrate is the major inorganic N source absorbed by upland plants, and the process of nitrate uptake and metabolism is tightly associated with water utilization, which is regulated by AQP. Nitrate was suggested to be a critical signalling factor for radial water fluxes in the roots [45,46,47], and the increased root hydraulic conductivity (Lpr) by nitrate was shown to correlate with up-regulation of aquaporin expression [46,47,48]. In maize, the expression of ZmPIP1;5b was strongly up-regulated by nitrate [49], and in tomato plants, several AQP genes were up-regulated by the nitrate supply [50], which can mediate and control the increased water influx into the root cells.
Recently, Li et al. [51] showed that Lpr and PIP expression were controlled by both exogenous and internal nitrate concentrations in Arabidopsis, and Lpr and PIP expressions were higher under 5 mM NO3 than 0.5 mM NO3. In nrt2.1 (the high-affinity NO3 transporter) mutant plants, NO3 content decreased in both the roots and shoots, which resulted in decreases in Lpr and PIP expression, indicating that the nitrate supply was positively correlated with enhanced root AQP activity and Lpr. However, the interactions between nitrate and aquaporins vary over time. In the short term, hours to days, nitrate induced aquaporin expression [50], while over multiple days, root morphology and proliferation were significantly altered by the nitrate supply, resulting in increases in root nitrate acquisition [52,53].

2.2. Ammonia/Ammonium

Root NH4+ uptake occurs mainly via ammonium transporters (AMT) in the plasma membrane, while NH3 has been proposed to enter the cells by free diffusion in higher plants. Transport of NH3/NH4+ and urea into the vacuole would allow for N storage and eliminate their toxicity to the plant [54], and when N was needed, the stored nitrogen could be remobilized by a passive, low-affinity transport pathway, which may involve the TIP proteins [23]. Indeed, several tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) have been shown to facilitate the NH3 transport, such as ZmTIP1;1 and ZmTIP1;2 [55]. TIPs from wheat (TaTIP2;1) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AtTIP2;1 and AtTIP2;3) not only function as water-conducting membrane pores but also facilitate the transport of NH3 across membranes and therefore mediate the remarkable loading and acid-trapping of the protonated form (NH4+) in the vacuole [26,56]. However, the importance of the channel pores in ammonia transport by TIP2;2 from wheat has been challenged by the finding that NH3 is not transported with water but through a separate pathway [25]. The crystal structure of an NH3 permeable aquaporin AtTIP2;1 demonstrated that an intriguing water-filled side pore, next to the substrate-binding histidine, is involved in deprotonating ammonium ions, thereby increasing the permeation of NH3 [57].
Additionally, there was a potential correlation between ammonium uptake and water absorption, which was regulated by AQP. In rice plants, ammonium could increase the expression of PIP and TIP genes in the roots and resulted in a higher water uptake rate compared with that of nitrate (Figure 1a). Under water stress, ammonium increased drought tolerance of rice plants by inducing aquaporin expression and/or activity, which corresponded with increased root water uptake ability [58]. However, in French bean plants with a ‘one shoot-two roots’ split root system, Guo et al. [59] demonstrated that the mRNA expression of PIP1 was higher in the roots supplied with nitrate than those supplied with ammonium (Figure 1b). Generally, rice prefers ammonium nutrition while beans prefer nitrate nutrition, demonstrating that AQP expression is upregulated under favoured nitrogen nutrition. These results suggested that ammonium and nitrate differentially regulated water uptake and AQP in different plant species.

2.3. Urea

Urea is a major N fertilizer used in agricultural production and is also a naturally occurring and readily available N source in soil. Urea is an uncharged small solute and passes through plant membranes via AQP [49,61,62,63], and members of the PIP, NIP, and TIP subfamilies have been shown to facilitate urea crossing membranes [23,24,64]. NIPs and PIPs, localized to the plasma membrane, function in urea movement between the apoplast and the symplast of plant cells [33,65,66]. In comparison, TIPs were targeted mainly to the tonoplast or other endo-membranes and are involved in equilibrating urea concentrations between different cellular compartments [23].
In Arabidopsis, several native NIPs, such as AtNIP6;1 and AtNIP5;1, were shown to transport urea, and AtNIP6;1 was also predicted to conduct substantial amounts of ammonia [64], and AtNIP5;1 was identified to transport boron acid [67]. However, AtNIP5;1 was identified to facilitate urea uptake only under B deficiency, in both high and low urea concentrations [67]. In maize plants, ZmNIP2;1, ZmNIP2;4, and ZmTIP4;4 were found to be involved in urea transport and played critical roles in urea uptake and movement, and stabilized urea concentrations in the tonoplast [23,63]. CsNIP2;1, a plasma membrane transporter from Cucumis sativus, facilitates urea uptake and internal transport during N remobilization and N delivery in plants [62]. In maize roots, the ZmPIP1;5, an aquaporin transport for water and urea, diverges from other PIP membranes by urea transport activity [49], and the expression of ZmPIP1;5 is induced by nitrate and modulated during the day-night cycle. Vacuoles could be used for short-term urea storage to avoid toxicity in the cytoplasm; this process was regulated by TIPs, which contribute to urea remobilization from the vacuole and equilibration within the cell [24,68]. Under nitrogen deficient conditions, expression of ZmNIP2;1 and ZmNIP2;4 was not affected, whereas the expression of ZmTIP4;4 increased significantly in the roots and expanded leaves, suggesting that ZmTIP4;4-regulated urea transport was essential for unloading vacuolar urea across the tonoplast under N starvation conditions [63]. Moreover, AtTIP1;1, AtTIP1;2, AtTIP2;1, and AtTIP4;1, which are different from the high-affinity H+/urea symporter AtDUR3, provide a less concentration- and pH-dependent pathway for urea transport from the external growth medium into the cytosol or from the cytosol into the vacuole [23,61]. AtTIP1;3 and AtTIP5;1, the only highly expressed pollen-specific aquaporins, function in N remobilization via transport of mitochondrial urea to the cytoplasm [61,69].
Aquaporins are tightly linked with N metabolism in higher plants, and the PIP, NIP, and TIP subfamilies have been shown to transport NH3 and urea, and maintain the balance between the cytoplasm and vacuole. Understanding the principles of N compounds passing through the plasma membrane by aquaporins allow us to modulate the N uptake and utilization, and improve the nitrogen use efficiency in plants. Nitrate and ammonium were different in regulation of plant water uptake and AQP expression depending on the plant species. Nitrate is suggested to be a critical signalling factor to induce PIPs expression and increase root hydraulic conductivity in nitrate preferred plants, while ammonia increases PIPs and TIPs expression and water uptake in ammonia preferred plants. The regulation of AQP by different nitrogen forms provides an effective pathway to increased plant water stress and water use efficiency in plants.

3. Phosphorus (P)

Phosphorus (P) is necessary for the synthesis of nucleic acids, which contains the genetic code of the plant for production of proteins and other compounds essential for plant structure, seed yield, and genetic transfer. A number of studies have indicated that the enhancement in plant growth with P fertilization is associated with an increased capacity of the plants to transport water [70,71]. The activity or density of aquaporins in the plasma membrane of root cells is diminished during nutrient stress, such as N- and P deprivation [48].
P is involved in root water uptake by altering aquaporin expression and/or activity [48,72]. P deficiency reduced aquaporin activity or abundance in the root plasma membrane [48] and was associated with a decrease in water uptake [72], which was attributed to phosphorylation of the plant aquaporins [73]. In Arabidopsis roots, the changes in the phosphorylation status of PIP aquaporins were positively correlated to changes in root hydraulic conductivity under NaCl, NO, and N and P starvation treatments [74]. Additionally, plants often exhibit disruption of water transport that is associated with enhanced ethylene production, which modulates root hydraulic conductivity by affecting the aquaporin activity under P deficient conditions [75,76]. As plant aquaporins are regulated by cytosolic pH and free Ca2+ activity [77], ethylene can elicit a rapid increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration by activating the Ca2+-permeable channels [78], as a result of inhibiting aquaporin activity. In sorghum plants, the root hydraulic conductivity of water-stressed plants with a sufficient P supply recovered faster than that of plants without a P supply, suggesting that sufficient P could increase AQP expression and/or activity after water recovery [79]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, which formed symbiotic associations with host plants, can uptake and deliver inorganic P to the host through hyphal networks. Under water stress, AM symbiosis can increase the tolerance of plants by regulating the AQP gene expression, osmotic adjustments, and plant growth [80,81].
The role of P on aquaporins is mainly focused on its phosphorylation functions by regulating aquaporin activity and abundance, and corresponds with regulated root hydraulic conductivity and water uptake. Further studies are needed to elucidate the specific functions of AQP genes regulated by AM symbiosis, in order to reveal the exact mechanism of AM symbiosis to deliver P and alter plant adaptation to environmental stressors.

4. Potassium (K)

Potassium ion (K+), the most abundant cation in higher plants, functions in osmo-regulation, cation-anion balance, stomatal movement, photosynthesis, energy transfer, carbohydrate phloem transport, enzyme activation, and protein synthesis, as well as stress resistance [41]. As K+ is the major osmolyte, its uptake will be accompanied by water flux through the aquaporins, and there was a positive correlation between K absorption and water uptake [82]. It was suggested that aquaporins could function as turgor sensors to modulate the conductance of K+ channels [83]. Transcripts encoding aquaporins were strongly affected by K+ starvation, even without water stress [84]. In Arabidopsis, iterative group analysis (iGA) identified 12 aquaporin genes in the shoots and 15 genes in the roots that were significantly up-regulated after K+ resupply [85]. The trafficking and activity of plasma membrane aquaporin PIPs is regulated by the SNARE SYP121, a plasma membrane resident syntaxin involved in vesicle trafficking, signaling, and regulation of K+ channels [86,87]. SYP121 plays a role in the regulation and maintenance of membrane osmotic water permeability through a coordinated regulation of the plasma membrane density of both PIP and K+ channels in membrane delivery and recycling [86].
The aquaporins may participate in ion homeostasis at the whole plant level by regulating the ratio of apoplastic/symplastic water flow and thus directing solute flux through different plant tissues. In onion roots, water transport was sensitive to inhibitors of aquaporins and K+ channels, and the decrease in hydraulic conductivity after K+ channel inhibitor treatment indicates that K+ fluxes are involved in aquaporin activity in the plasma membrane [88]. In Arabidopsis roots, the expression of genes encoding water channels of the aquaporins PIP1b, PIP2b, and TIP, as well as the K+ transporter HAK5 were reduced after K+ channel inhibitor (CsCl) treatment [89], suggesting that K+ channel blockers could reduce the hydraulic conductivity of the plasma membrane by down-regulating or blocking water channels.
It has been reported that aquaporins and K+ channels can function as plant osmo-regulators to maintain cytosolic osmolarity and increase the tolerance of the plant to drought or other stressors [90,91]. In rice, the expression of PIP and K+ channels responded similarly to K deficiency and water stress, in which expression of PIPs and K+ channel-encoding genes was induced by K+ starvation and down-regulated by water deficit during a short time, suggesting that aquaporins and K+ channels are functionally co-regulated during cell turgor regulation [90]. Loading K+ into the plant xylem could regulate the xylem hydraulic conductivity, which can help maintain cell turgor, stomatal aperture, and gas exchange rates, as a result of increasing drought tolerance [92,93]. During drought stress, plants modulate their water and ion uptake capacities by regulating aquaporins and K+ channels at the transcriptional level to respond to the water deficiency [90,94,95].
Aquaporins participate in whole plant ion homeostasis and act as turgor sensors to modulate the K+ channels. Aquaporins and K+ channels can function as plant osmo-regulators to maintain cytosolic osmolarity and increase tolerance to drought stress, which corresponds with rapid recovery of the shoot water status, cell turgidity, and thus plant growth. The coordination of aquaporins and K+ transport in plants during different stressors and physiological states, may be regulated by different signalling pathways.

5. Calcium (Ca)

Calcium (Ca) is an essential macronutrient that functions in the cell wall and membranes, acting as a counter-cation for inorganic and organic anions in the vacuole, as well as a secondary messenger in cell signal transduction [41,96,97]. Generally, Ca2+ enters the root apoplast via the mass flow from the soil solution [41], suggesting that transpiration-regulated water flow may be involved in Ca2+ delivery and storage, which could be regulated by aquaporins [97]. Conversely, Ca2+ could affect AQP activity and/or expression, and aquaporin expression was suppressed by Ca2+ starvation [84]. It has been reported that the inhibition of maize root water transport by HgCl2 was detected only in the presence of Ca2+ in the nutrient solution, suggesting that Ca2+ is involved in regulating aquaporin activity [98].
Several studies demonstrated that the aquaporin functions could be regulated by Ca2+ [99,100] and triggered by environmental stressors [101]. Under water stress, the expression or activity of aquaporins was affected [94,98], and this process could be facilitated by excess Ca2+ [102]. Salt stress decreased water transport through the plasma membrane and the root cortical cells by reducing Hg-sensitive aquaporin activity, and the ameliorative effect of Ca2+ on salt stress was related to aquaporin function [72,103,104]. In pepper plants, cytosolic Ca2+ decreased after long-term exposure to salt stress with a corresponding overall inhibition of aquaporins [105]. Reversible phosphorylation, a potential mechanism for plant aquaporin regulation during development and in the response of plants to environmental stimuli [73,106,107], could be regulated by Ca2+, indicating a link between aquaporin regulation and Ca2+ signalling [105].
In guard cells, extracellular Ca2+ is involved in stomatal movement by acting as an elicitor (second messenger) or aquaporin blocker, which may initiate the signal cascade and lead to the post-transcriptional regulation of aquaporins or directly block aquaporins [108]. The aquaporin gate was regulated by cytosolic Ca2+ transport, especially the opening and closing of verapamil-sensitive Ca2+ channels [104]. In vitro phosphorylation of the aquaporin PM28A was directly dependent on submicromolar Ca2+ concentrations [99]. Ca2+ is involved in plasma membrane aquaporin regulation via a chain of processes within the cell, but its effects are not due to alteration of the stability of the plasma membrane [104].
Cytosolic Ca2+ transport and Ca2+ channels might directly regulate water flow by acting on aquaporins, which would affect nutrient movement through the plant. In the response of plants to environmental stimuli, the functions of aquaporin could be regulated by Ca2+ via reversible phosphorylation. However, the regulation mechanism of Ca2+ on aquaporins and its physiological role in whole plant conditions remains to be established.

6. Boron (B)

Boron (B) is an essential micronutrient for plant growth and development, especially for the structure and function of the plant cell wall [41]. B deficiency and toxicity in plants results in a significant reduction in quality and yield of many crops worldwide [109,110]. Aquaporins have been shown to function in B transport in higher plants [111,112], and are required for normal plant growth under B deficiency and toxic conditions [17,113,114].
AtNIP5;1, a boric acid channel that belongs to the major intrinsic proteins (MIPs), is predominantly expressed in epidermal, cortical, and endodermal cells [17,30]. Under B deficiency, AtNIP5;1 expression was strongly up-regulated, which is critical for efficient B transport into the roots [17]. In nip5;1 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana, both root and shoot growth were inhibited under B deficiency [17], indicating that NIP5;1 was essential for the overall B uptake that was required for plant growth and development under B limitation. AtNIP6;1, which is homologous to AtNIP5;1, was shown to facilitate the rapid penetration of boric acid across the membrane and normal distribution of boric acid in plant tissues, but it is completely impermeable to water [113]. Similarly, the water channel OsNIP3;1 was also found to be a B-inducible channel in rice involved in B uptake and distribution [115].
In barley, the tolerance to excessive soil B is controlled by downregulated expression of HvNIP2;1 to reduce B uptake and leaf blade B accumulation. Expression of Bot1, a BOR1 ortholog that provides B tolerance to barley, was induced to eliminate B from the roots and sensitive tissues [114]. HvNIP2;1 is essential for B toxicity tolerance in barley in combination with Bot1. AtTIP5;1 plays a critical role in the B transport pathway possibly via vacuolar compartmentation, and the overexpression of AtTIP5;1 may facilitate the elimination of B toxicity in plants [116]. OsPIP1;3, OsPIP2;4, OsPIP2;6, and OsPIP2;7, members of the major intrinsic proteins (MIPs) family, were involved in both influx and efflux of B transport, and their expressions were strongly upregulated under B toxicity [117,118]. Briefly, aquaporins are essential for reducing the accumulation of toxic boric acid levels in plant tissues [9].
Aquaporins were involved in B uptake and distribution, and PIP, NIP, TIP, and XIP subfamilies have been shown to transport boric acid. Under B deficiency, NIPs are essential for efficient B uptake and distribution that is required for plant growth and development. Whereas under B toxicity, NIPs, TIPs, and PIPs are involved in reducing the accumulation of toxic boric acid levels in plant tissues. Manipulation of these aquaporins could be highly useful in improving plant tolerance to B deficiency or toxicity.

7. Silicon (Si)

Silicon (Si), the second most abundant element in the earth’s crust, is important for plant growth and development. Si is beneficial to the mechanical and physiological properties of plants and helps plants to overcome biotic and abiotic stress [34,119,120,121]. Under salt stress, Si can improve plant tolerance through enhancing root water uptake which contributes to the regulation of aquaporin activity and gene expression [122,123]. The Si uptake by plants in soil solution is through silicic acid [Si(OH)4], an uncharged molecule [34]. Silicic acid enters the plant roots mainly by water flow via the apoplastic and symplastic pathways, and the symplastic pathway involves the presence of water channels, mainly NIPs [124]. In rice, two Si transporters, Lsi1 and Lsi2, have been shown to be involved in Si uptake. Lsi1 is localized on the distal side of the plasma membrane of the exodermal and endodermal cells and functions as an influx transporter [33,125], whereas Lsi2 is located on the proximal side of the same root cells and functions as an efflux transporter [125,126]. The combination of Lsi1 and Lsi2 enables rice to efficiently transport silicic acid from the soil solution into the xylem of the roots. Lsi1 (also named OsNIP2;1) belongs to the NIP subfamily of aquaporins, and previous studies have shown that NIP proteins are permeable to a wide range of substrates, such as silicic acid [33], arsenite [125], boric acid [17], urea and formamide [64], glycerol [127], lactic acid [35], as well as selenite [128]. Lsi6 (OsNIP2;2), which is localized in the xylem parenchyma cells of leaf blades and sheaths, was also identified as responsible for Si xylem unloading [129]. In barley, a Lsi1 ortholog of HvLsi1 (HvNIP2;1), localized in the plasma membrane of epidermal cells and all cortical cells in roots, was identified as a Si influx transporter and shown to be involved in the radial transport of Si through the epidermal and cortical layers of the basal roots [32].
Si absorption is facilitated by NIPs, and two Si transporters have been identified that are involved in Si uptake, Lsi1 and Lsi2, which function as an influx and efflux transporter, respectively. Cooperation of Lsi1 and Lsi2 is required for the efficient transport of Si. The identification of Si transporters provides an insight into the Si uptake system in plants and a new approach for producing crops with high resistance to various biotic and abiotic stresses by genetic modification. To further elucidate the Si accumulation mechanism and understand the critical role of Si at the whole plant level, molecular and physiological characterization of Si transporters in different plant species is required in the future.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

A wide range of selectivity profiles and regulatory properties allow aquaporins to be involved in multiple functions in plant growth and development, such as water transport, and nitrogen, carbon, and micronutrient acquisition. Aquaporins, mainly PIPs, TIPs, and NIPs, have been shown to facilitate the transport of plant mineral nutrients across plasma membranes and cell organelles (Figure 2), such as ammonia, urea, boric acid, and silicic acid. Aquaporins are responsible for ensuring different mineral nutrient availability for the plant and play essential roles in mineral nutrient absorption, mobilization, detoxification, and homeostasis. There is a tight link between plant aquaporins and mineral nutrients. Aquaporin expression is regulated by mineral nutrient availability and plant species. Aquaporin function can be regulated by mineral nutrients in the response of plants to environmental stimuli, such as drought and salt stress, nutrient deficiency, and toxicity. Understanding the interactions between aquaporins and mineral nutrients allow us to modulate the water and mineral nutrient uptake and utilization, and improve the water and nutrient use efficiency in plants, as well as increase tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. In the future, attention should be focused on:
(1)
The functions of aquaporins in the transport of other novel putative substrates, such as Mg, S, and other micronutrients, which await further investigation.
(2)
New aquaporin subclasses and unknown functions of aquaporins recently discovered in certain plant species should be deciphered.
(3)
Investigation of the interactions between water and mineral nutrient transport, as well as interactions between different mineral nutrients regulated by aquaporins will be required.
(4)
The role of aquaporins during biotic and abiotic stress, and the relevance of altered aquaporin expression for biotechnological improvement of plant tolerance must be explored.
(5)
Aquaporin functions need to be further investigated concerning whole plant physiology, which requires a better understanding of how the various aquaporin transport activities are coupled with plant mineral nutrient transport proteins.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB150505 and 2013CB127403), the National Key R & D Program (2016YFD0200300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272236 and 31401941), the Key Fund Project of Jiangsu Province (BK20150059), the Jiangsu Postdoctoral Science Foundation (1402148C), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571768).

Author Contributions

Min Wang and Shiwei Guo wrote the paper; Lei Ding performed the experiments; Limin Gao and Yingrui Li analyzed the data; Qirong Shen and Shiwei Guo commented and improved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heinen, R.B.; Ye, Q.; Chaumont, F. Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 2971–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Maurel, C. Aquaporins and water permeability of plant membranes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 48, 399–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Maurel, C.; Santoni, V.; Luu, D.T.; Wudick, M.M.; Verdoucq, L. The cellular dynamics of plant aquaporin expression and functions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Maurel, C.; Verdoucq, L.; Luu, D.T.; Santoni, V. Plant aquaporins: Membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 595–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Maurel, C.; Chrispeels, M.J. Aquaporins. A molecular entry into plant water relations. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bienert, G.P.; Chaumont, F. Plant aquaporins: Roles in water homeostasis, nutrition, and signaling processes. In Transporters and Pumps in Plant Signaling; Geisler, M., Venema, K., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin & Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wallace, I.S.; Choi, W.G.; Roberts, D.M. The structure, function and regulation of the nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein family of plant aquaglyceroporins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1758, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ishikawa, F.; Suga, S.; Uemura, T.; Sato, M.H.; Maeshima, M. Novel type aquaporin SIPs are mainly localized to the ER membrane and show cell-specific expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 5814–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Bienert, G.P.; Bienert, M.D.; Jahn, T.P.; Boutry, M.; Chaumont, F. Solanaceae XIPs are plasma membrane aquaporins that facilitate the transport of many uncharged substrates. Plant J. 2011, 66, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Danielson, J.A.H.; Johanson, U. Unexpected complexity of the aquaporin gene family in the moss Physcomitrella patens. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hachez, C.; Zelazny, E.; Chaumont, F. Modulating the expression of aquaporin genes in planta: A key to understand their physiological functions? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1758, 1142–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.J.; Shuman, J.; Shulaev, V.; Davletova, S.; Mittler, R. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sade, N.; Gebretsadik, M.; Seligmann, R.; Schwartz, A.; Wallach, R.; Moshelion, M. The role of tobacco Aquaporin1 in improving water use efficiency, hydraulic conductivity, and yield production under salt stress. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, Y.; Hu, W.; Liu, J.H.; Zhang, J.B.; Jia, C.H.; Miao, H.X.; Xu, B.Y.; Jin, Z.Q. A banana aquaporin gene, MaPIP1;1, is involved in tolerance to drought and salt stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, C.; Zhou, S.Y.; Hu, W.; Deng, X.M.; Wei, S.Y.; Yang, G.X.; He, G.Y. The wheat aquaporin gene TaAQP7 confers tolerance to cold stress in transgenic tobacco. Z. Naturforsch. C. 2014, 69, 142–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ahamed, A.; Murai-Hatano, M.; Ishikawa-Sakurai, J.; Hayashi, H.; Kawamura, Y.; Uemura, M. Cold stress-induced acclimation in rice is mediated by root-specific aquaporins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Takano, J.; Wada, M.; Ludewig, U.; Schaaf, G.; von Wiren, N.; Fujiwara, T. The Arabidopsis major intrinsic protein NIP5;1 is essential for efficient boron uptake and plant development under boron limitation. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1498–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhao, F.J.; Ago, Y.; Mitani, N.; Li, R.Y.; Su, Y.H.; Yamaji, N.; McGrath, S.P.; Ma, J.F. The role of the rice aquaporin Lsi1 in arsenite efflux from roots. New Phytol. 2010, 186, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhao, F.J.; Ma, J.F.; Meharg, A.A.; McGrath, S.P. Arsenic uptake and metabolism in plants. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 777–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zou, J.J.; Rodriguez-Zas, S.; Aldea, M.; Li, M.; Zhu, J.; Gonzalez, D.O.; Vodkin, L.O.; DeLucia, E.; Clough, S.J. Expression profiling soybean response to Pseudomonas syringae reveals new defense-related genes and rapid HR-specific downregulation of photosynthesis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kim, M.J.; Kim, H.R.; Paek, K.H. Arabidopsis tonoplast proteins TIP1 and TIP2 interact with the cucumber mosaic virus 1a replication protein. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 3425–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Afzal, Z.; Howton, T.C.; Sun, Y.; Mukhtar, M.S. The roles of aquaporins in plant stress responses. J. Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, L.H.; Ludewig, U.; Gassert, B.; Frommer, W.B.; von Wiren, N. Urea transport by nitrogen-regulated tonoplast intrinsic proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gerbeau, P.; Guclu, J.; Ripoche, P.; Maurel, C. Aquaporin Nt-TIPa can account for the high permeability of tobacco cell vacuolar membrane to small neutral solutes. Plant J. 1999, 18, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bertl, A.; Kaldenhoff, R. Function of a separate NH3-pore in Aquaporin TIP2;2 from wheat. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 5413–5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Loque, D.; Ludewig, U.; Yuan, L.X.; von Wiren, N. Tonoplast intrinsic proteins AtTIP2;1 and AtTIP2;3 facilitate NH3 transport into the vacuole. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Flexas, J.; Ribas-Carbó, M.; Hanson, D.T.; Bota, J.; Otto, B.; Cifre, J.; McDowell, N.; Medrano, H.; Kaldenhoff, R. Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO2 in vivo. Plant J. 2006, 48, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Uehlein, N.; Lovisolo, C.; Siefritz, F.; Kaldenhoff, R. The tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is a membrane CO2 pore with physiological functions. Nature 2003, 425, 734–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ding, L.; Gao, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, M.; Gu, M.; Ren, B.; Xu, G.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. Aquaporin plays an important role in mediating chloroplastic CO2 concentration under high-N supply in rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Physiol. Plant. 2016, 156, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kato, Y.; Miwa, K.; Takano, J.; Wada, M.; Fujiwara, T. Highly boron deficiency-tolerant plants generated by enhanced expression of NIP5;1, a boric acid channel. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Durbak, A.R.; Phillips, K.A.; Pike, S.; O’Neill, M.; Mares, J.; Gallavotti, A.; Malcomber, S.T.; Gassmann, W.; McSteen, P. Transport of boron by the tassel-less1 aquaporin is critical for vegetative and reproductive development in maize. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2978–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chiba, Y.; Mitani, N.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. HvLsi1 is a silicon influx transporter in barley. Plant J. 2009, 57, 810–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ma, J.F.; Tamai, K.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Konishi, S.; Katsuhara, M.; Ishiguro, M.; Murata, Y.; Yano, M. A silicon transporter in rice. Nature 2006, 440, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N. Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Choi, W.G.; Roberts, D.M. Arabidopsis NIP2;1, a major intrinsic protein transporter of lactic acid induced by anoxic stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 24209–24218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bienert, G.P.; Moller, A.L.B.; Kristiansen, K.A.; Schulz, A.; Moller, I.M.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Jahn, T.P. Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dynowski, M.; Schaaf, G.; Loque, D.; Moran, O.; Ludewig, U. Plant plasma membrane water channels conduct the signalling molecule H2O2. Biochem. J. 2008, 414, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bienert, G.P.; Chaumont, F. Aquaporin-facilitated transmembrane diffusion of hydrogen peroxide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bienert, G.P.; Schussler, M.D.; Jahn, T.P. Metalloids: Essential, beneficial or toxic? Major intrinsic proteins sort it out. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kusano, M.; Fukushima, A.; Redestig, H.; Saito, K. Metabolomic approaches toward understanding nitrogen metabolism in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1439–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Marschner, H.; Marschner, P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: London, UK; Academic Press: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hacke, U.G.; Plavcova, L.; Almeida-Rodriguez, A.; King-Jones, S.; Zhou, W.C.; Cooke, J.E.K. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on xylem traits and aquaporin expression in stems of hybrid poplar. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 1016–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ishikawa-Sakurai, J.; Hayashi, H.; Murai-Hatano, M. Nitrogen availability affects hydraulic conductivity of rice roots, possibly through changes in aquaporin gene expression. Plant Soil 2014, 379, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ren, B.B.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.P.; Sun, G.M.; Li, Y.; Shen, Q.R.; Guo, S.W. Water absorption is affected by the nitrogen supply to rice plants. Plant Soil 2015, 396, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wilkinson, S.; Bacon, M.A.; Davies, W.J. Nitrate signalling to stomata and growing leaves: Interactions with soil drying, ABA, and xylem sap pH in maize. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1705–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gloser, V.; Zwieniecki, M.A.; Orians, C.M.; Holbrook, N.M. Dynamic changes in root hydraulic properties in response to nitrate availability. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2409–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gorska, A.; Ye, Q.; Holbrook, N.M.; Zwieniecki, M.A. Nitrate control of root hydraulic properties in plants: Translating local information to whole plant response. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Clarkson, D.T.; Carvajal, M.; Henzler, T.; Waterhouse, R.N.; Smyth, A.J.; Cooke, D.T.; Steudle, E. Root hydraulic conductance: Diurnal aquaporin expression and the effects of nutrient stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gaspar, M.; Bousser, A.; Sissoeff, I.; Roche, O.; Hoarau, J.; Mahe, A. Cloning and characterization of ZmPIP1-5b, an aquaporin transporting water and urea. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Y.H.; Garvin, D.F.; Kochian, L.V. Nitrate-induced genes in tomato roots. Array analysis reveals novel genes that may play a role in nitrogen nutrition. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1323–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, G.; Tillard, P.; Gojon, A.; Maurel, C. Dual regulation of root hydraulic conductivity and plasma membrane aquaporins by plant nitrate accumulation and high-affinity nitrate transporter NRT2.1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Remans, T.; Nacry, P.; Pervent, M.; Filleur, S.; Diatloff, E.; Mounier, E.; Tillard, P.; Forde, B.G.; Gojon, A. The Arabidopsis NRT1.1 transporter participates in the signaling pathway triggering root colonization of nitrate-rich patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19206–19211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Walch-Liu, P.; Ivanov, I.I.; Filleur, S.; Gan, Y.B.; Remans, T.; Forde, B.G. Nitrogen regulation of root branching. Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, W.H.; Kohler, B.; Cao, F.Q.; Liu, L.H. Molecular and physiological aspects of urea transport in higher plants. Plant Sci. 2008, 175, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Barzana, G.; Aroca, R.; Bienert, G.P.; Chaumont, F.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. New insights into the regulation of aquaporins by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in maize plants under drought stress and possible implications for plant performance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Jahn, T.P.; Moller, A.L.B.; Zeuthen, T.; Holm, L.M.; Klaerke, D.A.; Mohsin, B.; Kuhlbrandt, W.; Schjoerring, J.K. Aquaporin homologues in plants and mammals transport ammonia. FEBS Lett. 2004, 574, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kirscht, A.; Kaptan, S.S.; Bienert, G.P.; Chaumont, F.; Nissen, P.; de Groot, B.L.; Kjellbom, P.; Gourdon, P.; Johanson, U. Crystal structure of an ammonia-permeable aquaporin. PLoS Biol. 2016, 14, e1002411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ding, L.; Gao, C.M.; Li, Y.R.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Xu, G.H.; Shen, Q.R.; Kaldenhoff, R.; Kai, L.; Guo, S.W. The enhanced drought tolerance of rice plants under ammonium is related to aquaporin (AQP). Plant Sci. 2015, 234, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guo, S.W.; Kaldenhoff, R.; Uehlein, N.; Sattelmacher, B.; Brueck, H. Relationship between water and nitrogen uptake in nitrate- and ammonium-supplied Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ding, L.; Li, Y.R.; Wang, Y.; Gao, L.M.; Wang, M.; Chaumont, F.; Shen, Q.R.; Guo, S.W. Root ABA accumulation enhances rice seedling drought tolerance under ammonium supply: Interaction with aquaporins. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, in press. [Google Scholar]
  61. Soto, G.; Alleva, K.; Mazzella, M.A.; Amodeo, G.; Muschietti, J.P. AtTIP1;3 and AtTIP5;1, the only highly expressed Arabidopsis pollen-specific aquaporins, transport water and urea. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582, 4077–4082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, L.; Yan, J.; Vatamaniuk, O.K.; Du, X. CsNIP2;1 is a plasma membrane transporter from Cucumis sativus that facilitates urea uptake when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 616–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gu, R.L.; Chen, X.L.; Zhou, Y.L.; Yuan, L.X. Isolation and characterization of three maize aquaporin genes, ZmNIP2;1, ZmNIP2;4 and ZmTIP4;4 involved in urea transport. BMB Rep. 2012, 45, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wallace, I.S.; Roberts, D.M. Distinct transport selectivity of two structural subclasses of the nodulin-like intrinsic protein family of plant aquaglyceroporin channels. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 16826–16834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chaumont, F.; Barrieu, F.; Jung, R.; Chrispeels, M.J. Plasma membrane intrinsic proteins from maize cluster in two sequence subgroups with differential aquaporin activity. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 1025–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gao, Z.X.; He, X.L.; Zhao, B.C.; Zhou, C.J.; Liang, Y.Z.; Ge, R.C.; Shen, Y.Z.; Huang, Z.J. Overexpressing a putative aquaporin gene from wheat, TaNIP, enhances salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yang, H.Y.; Menz, J.; Haussermann, I.; Benz, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Ludewig, U. High and low affinity urea root uptake: Involvement of NIP5;1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 1588–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tyerman, S.D.; Bohnert, H.J.; Maurel, C.; Steudle, E.; Smith, J.A.C. Plant aquaporins: Their molecular biology, biophysics and significance for plant water relations. J. Exp. Bot. 1999, 50, 1055–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Soto, G.; Fox, R.; Ayub, N.; Alleva, K.; Guaimas, F.; Erijman, E.J.; Mazzella, A.; Amodeo, G.; Muschietti, J. TIP5;1 is an aquaporin specifically targeted to pollen mitochondria and is probably involved in nitrogen remobilization in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010, 64, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Cheeseman, J.M.; Lovelock, C.E. Photosynthetic characteristics of dwarf and fringe Rhizophora mangle L. in a Belizean mangrove. Plant Cell Environ. 2004, 27, 769–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lovelock, C.E.; Ball, M.C.; Choat, B.; Engelbrecht, B.M.J.; Holbrook, N.M.; Feller, I.C. Linking physiological processes with mangrove forest structure: Phosphorus deficiency limits canopy development, hydraulic conductivity and photosynthetic carbon gain in dwarf Rhizophora mangle. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Carvajal, M.; Cooke, D.T.; Clarkson, D.T. Responses of wheat plants to nutrient deprivation may involve the regulation of water-channel function. Planta 1996, 199, 372–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Johansson, I.; Karlsson, M.; Shukla, V.K.; Chrispeels, M.J.; Larsson, C.; Kjellbom, P. Water transport activity of the plasma membrane aquaporin PM28A is regulated by phosphorylation. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Di Pietro, M.; Vialaret, J.; Li, G.W.; Hem, S.; Prado, K.; Rossignol, M.; Maurel, C.; Santoni, V. Coordinated post-translational responses of aquaporins to abiotic and nutritional stimuli in Arabidopsis roots. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2013, 12, 3886–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Li, Y.S.; Mao, X.T.; Tian, Q.Y.; Li, L.H.; Zhang, W.H. Phosphorus deficiency-induced reduction in root hydraulic conductivity in Medicago falcata is associated with ethylene production. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kamaluddin, M.; Zwiazek, J.J. Ethylene enhances water transport in hypoxic aspen. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 962–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Alleva, K.; Niemietz, C.M.; Maurel, C.; Parisi, M.; Tyerman, S.D.; Amodeo, G. Plasma membrane of Beta vulgaris storage root shows high water channel activity regulated by cytoplasmic pH and a dual range of calcium concentrations. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 609–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhao, M.G.; Tian, Q.Y.; Zhang, W.H. Ethylene activates a plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable channel in tobacco suspension cells. New Phytol. 2007, 174, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shangguan, Z.P.; Lei, T.W.; Shao, M.A.; Xue, Q.W. Effects of phosphorus nutrient on the hydraulic conductivity of sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) seedling roots under water deficiency. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2005, 47, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yooyongwech, S.; Samphumphuang, T.; Tisarum, R.; Theerawitaya, C.; Cha-um, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) improved water deficit tolerance in two different sweet potato genotypes involves osmotic adjustments via soluble sugar and free proline. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2016, 198, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. He, F.; Zhang, H.Q.; Tang, M. Aquaporin gene expression and physiological responses of Robinia pseudoacacia L. to the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and drought stress. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Guo, S.W.; Shen, Q.R.; Brueck, H. Effects of local nitrogen supply on water uptake of bean plants in a split root system. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hill, A.E.; Shachar Hill, B.; Shachar Hill, Y. What are aquaporins for? J. Membr. Biol. 2004, 197, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Maathuis, F.J.M.; Filatov, V.; Herzyk, P.; Krijger, G.C.; Axelsen, K.B.; Chen, S.X.; Green, B.J.; Li, Y.; Madagan, K.L.; Sanchez-Fernandez, R.; et al. Transcriptome analysis of root transporters reveals participation of multiple gene families in the response to cation stress. Plant J. 2003, 35, 675–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Armengaud, P.; Breitling, R.; Amtmann, A. The potassium-dependent transcriptome of Arabidopsis reveals a prominent role of jasmonic acid in nutrient signaling. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2556–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Besserer, A.; Burnotte, E.; Bienert, G.P.; Chevalier, A.S.; Errachid, A.; Grefen, C.; Blatt, M.R.; Chaumont, F. Selective regulation of maize plasma membrane aquaporin trafficking and activity by the SNARE SYP121. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3463–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hachez, C.; Laloux, T.; Reinhardt, H.; Cavez, D.; Degand, H.; Grefen, C.; de Rycke, R.; Inze, D.; Blatt, M.R.; Russinova, E.; et al. Arabidopsis SNAREs SYP61 and SYP121 coordinate the trafficking of plasma membrane aquaporin PIP2;7 to modulate the cell membrane water permeability. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3132–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tazawa, M.; Sutou, E.; Shibasaka, M. Onion root water transport sensitive to water channel and K+ channel inhibitors. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sahr, T.; Voigt, G.; Paretzke, H.G.; Schramel, P.; Ernst, D. Caesium-affected gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Liu, H.Y.; Sun, W.N.; Su, W.A.; Tang, Z.C. Co-regulation of water channels and potassium channels in rice. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 128, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.S.; Shen, Q.R.; Guo, S.W. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7370–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Oddo, E.; Inzerillo, S.; La Bella, F.; Grisafi, F.; Salleo, S.; Nardini, A. Short-term effects of potassium fertilization on the hydraulic conductance of Laurus nobilis L. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zwieniecki, M.A.; Melcher, P.J.; Holbrook, N.M. Hydrogel control of xylem hydraulic resistance in plants. Science 2001, 291, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Galmes, J.; Pou, A.; Alsina, M.M.; Tomas, M.; Medrano, H.; Flexas, J. Aquaporin expression in response to different water stress intensities and recovery in Richter-110 (Vitis sp.): Relationship with ecophysiological status. Planta 2007, 226, 671–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Cuéllar, T.; Pascaud, F.; Verdeil, J.L.; Torregrosa, L.; Adam-Blondon, A.F.; Thibaud, J.B.; Sentenac, H.; Gaillard, I. A grapevine Shaker inward K+ channel activated by the calcineurin B-like calcium sensor 1-protein kinase CIPK23 network is expressed in grape berries under drought stress conditions. Plant J. 2010, 61, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Bush, D.S. Calcium regulation in plant-cells and its role in signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1995, 46, 95–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gilliham, M.; Dayod, M.; Hocking, B.J.; Xu, B.; Conn, S.J.; Kaiser, B.N.; Leigh, R.A.; Tyerman, S.D. Calcium delivery and storage in plant leaves: Exploring the link with water flow. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 2233–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ionenko, I.F.; Anisimov, A.V.; Karimova, F.G. Water transport in maize roots under the influence of mercuric chloride and water stress: A role of water channels. Biol. Plant. 2006, 50, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Johansson, I.; Larsson, C.; Ek, B.; Kjellbom, P. The major integral proteins of spinach leaf plasma membranes are putative aquaporins and are phosphorylated in response to Ca2+ and apoplastic water potential. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1181–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Azad, A.K.; Sawa, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Shibata, H. Characterization of protein phosphatase 2A acting on phosphorylated plasma membrane aquaporin of tulip petals. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004, 68, 1170–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Steudle, E.; Henzler, T. Water channels in plants: Do basic concepts of water transport change? J. Exp. Bot. 1995, 46, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wu, Y.; Liu, X.F.; Wang, W.F.; Zhang, S.Q.; Xu, B.C. Calcium regulates the cell-to-cell water flow pathway in maize roots during variable water conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 58, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Carvajal, M.; CerdÁ, A.; MartÍNez, V. Does calcium ameliorate the negative effect of NaCl on melon root water transport by regulating aquaporin activity? New Phytol. 2000, 145, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cabanero, F.J.; Martinez-Ballesta, M.C.; Teruel, J.A.; Carvajal, M. New evidence about the relationship between water channel activity and calcium in salinity-stressed pepper plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 224–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Martinez-Ballesta, M.C.; Cabanero, F.; Olmos, E.; Periago, P.M.; Maurel, C.; Carvajal, M. Two different effects of calcium on aquaporins in salinity-stressed pepper plants. Planta 2008, 228, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Luu, D.T.; Maurel, C. Aquaporins in a challenging environment: Molecular gears for adjusting plant water status. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vera-Estrella, R.; Barkla, B.J.; Bohnert, H.J.; Pantoja, O. Novel regulation of aquaporins during osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2318–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yang, H.M.; Zhang, X.Y.; Tang, Q.L.; Wang, G.X. Extracellular calcium is involved in stomatal movement through the regulation of water channels in broad bean. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 50, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shorrocks, V.M. The occurrence and correction of boron deficiency. Plant Soil 1997, 193, 121–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Blevins, D.G.; Lukaszewski, K.M. Boron in plant structure and function. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 481–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Dordas, C.; Chrispeels, M.J.; Brown, P.H. Permeability and channel-mediated transport of boric acid across membrane vesicles isolated from squash roots. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 1349–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Fitzpatrick, K.L.; Reid, R.J. The involvement of aquaglyceroporins in transport of boron in barley roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1357–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tanaka, M.; Wallace, I.S.; Takano, J.; Roberts, D.M.; Fujiwara, T. NIP6;1 is a boric acid channel for preferential transport of boron to growing shoot tissues in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2860–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Schnurbusch, T.; Hayes, J.; Hrmova, M.; Baumann, U.; Ramesh, S.A.; Tyerman, S.D.; Langridge, P.; Sutton, T. Boron toxicity tolerance in barley through reduced expression of the multifunctional aquaporin HvNIP2;1. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1706–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hanaoka, H.; Fujiwara, T. Channel-mediated boron transport in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007, 48, S227. [Google Scholar]
  116. Pang, Y.Q.; Li, L.J.; Ren, F.; Lu, P.L.; Wei, P.C.; Cai, J.H.; Xin, L.G.; Zhang, J.A.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.C. Overexpression of the tonoplast aquaporin AtTIP5;1 conferred tolerance to boron toxicity in Arabidopsis. J. Genet. Genom. 2010, 37, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mosa, K.A.; Kumar, K.; Chhikara, S.; Musante, C.; White, J.C.; Dhankher, O.P. Enhanced boron tolerance in plants mediated by bidirectional transport through plasma membrane intrinsic proteins. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kumar, K.; Mosa, K.A.; Chhikara, S.; Musante, C.; White, J.C.; Dhankher, O.P. Two rice plasma membrane intrinsic proteins, OsPIP2;4 and OsPIP2;7, are involved in transport and providing tolerance to boron toxicity. Planta 2014, 239, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Epstein, E. Silicon. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 50, 641–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Richmond, K.E.; Sussman, M. Got silicon? The non-essential beneficial plant nutrient. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ma, J.F. Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2004, 50, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhu, Y.X.; Xu, X.B.; Hu, Y.H.; Han, W.H.; Yin, J.L.; Li, H.L.; Gong, H.J. Silicon improves salt tolerance by increasing root water uptake in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1629–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Liu, P.; Yin, L.N.; Wang, S.W.; Zhang, M.J.; Deng, X.P.; Zhang, S.Q.; Tanaka, K. Enhanced root hydraulic conductance by aquaporin regulation accounts for silicon alleviated salt-induced osmotic stress in Sorghum bicolor L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 111, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Guerriero, G.; Hausman, J.F.; Legay, S. Silicon and the plant extracellular matrix. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Xu, X.Y.; Su, Y.H.; McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.J. Transporters of arsenite in rice and their role in arsenic accumulation in rice grain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 9931–9935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Tamai, K.; Konishi, S.; Fujiwara, T.; Katsuhara, M.; Yano, M. An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature 2007, 448, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Dean, R.M.; Rivers, R.L.; Zeidel, M.L.; Roberts, D.M. Purification and functional reconstitution of soybean nodulin 26. An aquaporin with water and glycerol transport properties. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Zhao, X.Q.; Mitani, N.; Yamaji, N.; Shen, R.F.; Ma, J.F. Involvement of silicon influx transporter OsNIP2; 1 in selenite uptake in rice. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 1871–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Yamaji, N.; Mitatni, N.; Ma, J.F. A transporter regulating silicon distribution in rice shoots. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1381–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of different nitrogen sources (ammonium vs. nitrate) on aquaporin (AQP) expression in rice (a) and French bean plants (b). Rice plants were supplied with 2.5 mM ammonium [(NH4)2SO4] or nitrate [Ca(NO3)2] for two weeks. Root samples were collected for RNA isolation, and quantitative real-time PCR (q-RT-PCR) was performed to detect the relative expression of the plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) and tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) [60]; (b) French bean plants were grown in a split-root system, in which half of the roots were supplied with 5 mM ammonium [(NH4)2SO4] or nitrate [Ca(NO3)2]. The PIP1 aquaporin expression in the roots was determined via Northern blot analysis until day 5 after the treatments [59].
Figure 1. Effect of different nitrogen sources (ammonium vs. nitrate) on aquaporin (AQP) expression in rice (a) and French bean plants (b). Rice plants were supplied with 2.5 mM ammonium [(NH4)2SO4] or nitrate [Ca(NO3)2] for two weeks. Root samples were collected for RNA isolation, and quantitative real-time PCR (q-RT-PCR) was performed to detect the relative expression of the plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) and tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) [60]; (b) French bean plants were grown in a split-root system, in which half of the roots were supplied with 5 mM ammonium [(NH4)2SO4] or nitrate [Ca(NO3)2]. The PIP1 aquaporin expression in the roots was determined via Northern blot analysis until day 5 after the treatments [59].
Ijms 17 01229 g001aIjms 17 01229 g001b
Figure 2. The multiple cellular functions of plant aquaporins in mineral nutrition. The figure illustrates the variety of transporter functions of aquaporins in various subcellular compartments. The different subclasses of aquaporins are identified in different colours. The plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) might be involved in the internal re-distribution of mineral nutrients by transporting them from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the plasma membrane via the Golgi apparatus. Moreover, PIPs also undergo repeated cycles of endocytosis and recycling through the early endosome to the multivesicular body/prevacuolar compartments before eventually being targeted to the vacuole. PIPs primarily facilitated urea and boric acid transport, while tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) are principally involved in urea, NH3, and boric acid transport, and nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs) are involved in urea, boric acid, and silicic acid transport.
Figure 2. The multiple cellular functions of plant aquaporins in mineral nutrition. The figure illustrates the variety of transporter functions of aquaporins in various subcellular compartments. The different subclasses of aquaporins are identified in different colours. The plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) might be involved in the internal re-distribution of mineral nutrients by transporting them from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the plasma membrane via the Golgi apparatus. Moreover, PIPs also undergo repeated cycles of endocytosis and recycling through the early endosome to the multivesicular body/prevacuolar compartments before eventually being targeted to the vacuole. PIPs primarily facilitated urea and boric acid transport, while tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs) are principally involved in urea, NH3, and boric acid transport, and nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs) are involved in urea, boric acid, and silicic acid transport.
Ijms 17 01229 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, M.; Ding, L.; Gao, L.; Li, Y.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The Interactions of Aquaporins and Mineral Nutrients in Higher Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081229

AMA Style

Wang M, Ding L, Gao L, Li Y, Shen Q, Guo S. The Interactions of Aquaporins and Mineral Nutrients in Higher Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(8):1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Min, Lei Ding, Limin Gao, Yingrui Li, Qirong Shen, and Shiwei Guo. 2016. "The Interactions of Aquaporins and Mineral Nutrients in Higher Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 8: 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081229

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop