Biobanking of Exosomes in the Era of Precision Medicine: Are We There Yet?
AbstractThe emerge of personalized medicine demands high-quality human biospecimens with appropriate clinical annotation, especially in complex diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, and metabolic alterations in which specimen heterogeneity and individual responses often complicate the development of precision therapeutic programs. In the growing field of extracellular vesicles (EVs) research, exosomes (EXOs)—a particular type of EVs—have been proposed as an advantageous diagnostic tool, as effective delivery vehicles and as therapeutic targets. However, the lack of consensus on isolation methods and rigorous criteria to characterize them puts the term EXO into question at the time that might explain some of the controversial results found in the literature. A lack of response in the biobank network to warrant standard optimized procedures for the isolation, characterization, and storage of EXOs will undoubtedly lead to a waste of resources and failure. This review is aimed at highlighting the increasing importance of EXOs for the clinic, especially in the cancer field, and at summarizing the initiatives taken to improve current isolation procedures, classification criteria, and storage conditions of EXOs as an effort to identify technological demands that biobank platforms face for the incorporation of EXOs and other extracellular vesicle fractions as valuable biospecimens for research. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Mora, E.M.; Álvarez-Cubela, S.; Oltra, E. Biobanking of Exosomes in the Era of Precision Medicine: Are We There Yet? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 13.
Mora EM, Álvarez-Cubela S, Oltra E. Biobanking of Exosomes in the Era of Precision Medicine: Are We There Yet? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(1):13.Chicago/Turabian Style
Mora, Edna M.; Álvarez-Cubela, Silvia; Oltra, Elisa. 2016. "Biobanking of Exosomes in the Era of Precision Medicine: Are We There Yet?" Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, no. 1: 13.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.