<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ijms</journal-id>
<journal-title>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1422-0067</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms13021720</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijms-13-01720</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Effect of <italic>C</italic>-Terminal Helix on the Stability of FF Domain Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulation</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Liling</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-13-01720">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-ijms-13-01720">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Zanxia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-13-01720">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-ijms-13-01720">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jihua</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-13-01720">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-ijms-13-01720">2</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-ijms-13-01720">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijms-13-01720">
<label>1</label>Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Functional Macromolecular Biophysics, Dezhou University, 566 University Rd. West, Dezhou 253023, China; E-Mails: <email>zhaoll@dzu.edu.cn</email> (L.Z.); <email>qiayilai@mail.ustc.edu.cn</email> (Z.C.)</aff>
<aff id="af2-ijms-13-01720">
<label>2</label>Department of Physics, Dezhou University, 566 University Rd. West, Dezhou 253023, China</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-ijms-13-01720">
<label>*</label>Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: <email>jhwyh@yahoo.com.cn</email>; Tel.: +86-534-8985933; Fax: +86-534-8985884.</corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2012</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>2</month>
<year>2012</year></pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>1720</fpage>
<lpage>1732</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>16</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2011</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>20</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2012</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>1</month>
<year>2012</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2012</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0">
<p>This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).</p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>To investigate the effect of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix on the stability of the FF domain, we studied the native domain FF3-71 from human HYPA/FBP11 and the truncated version FF3-60 with <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix being deleted by molecular dynamics simulations with GROMACS package and GROMOS 43A1 force field. The results indicated that the structures of truncated version FF3-60 were evident different from those of native partner FF3-71. Compared with FF3-71, the FF3-60 lost some native contacts and exhibited some similar structural characters to those of intermediate state. The <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix played a major role in stabilizing the FF3-71 domain. To a certain degree, the FF domain had a tendency to form an intermediate state without the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix. In our knowledge, this was the first study to examine the role of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix of FF domain in detail by molecular dynamics simulations, which was useful to understand the three-state folding mechanism of the small FF domain.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>FF domain</kwd>
<kwd>molecular dynamics simulation</kwd>
<kwd><italic>C</italic>-terminal helix</kwd>
<kwd>structural stability</kwd>
<kwd>intermediate state</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Small single-domain proteins have important roles in studying protein conformational and dynamical properties. Studying these proteins reveals the principles of protein folding. At the same time, it is useful for optimizing a predictive computational method. Many single-domain proteins are thought to be a two-state transition between folded and unfolded states and their folding is a process of cooperative nucleation-condensation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-ijms-13-01720">1</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-ijms-13-01720">3</xref>]. With the increase in research concerning single-domain proteins, some have been found with three-state behaviors such as bacterial immunity protein Im7 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-ijms-13-01720">4</xref>], FF domains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-13-01720">5</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-13-01720">7</xref>], SH3 domains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijms-13-01720">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-ijms-13-01720">9</xref>], single-chain monellin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-ijms-13-01720">10</xref>], hUBF HMG box-5 domain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-ijms-13-01720">11</xref>].</p>
<p>FF domains have about 60–71 amino acid residues involved in transcription, RNA splicing, and signal transduction, and often exist in tandem arrays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijms-13-01720">12</xref>]. They present in a variety of eukaryotic proteins including the transcription factor CA150 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijms-13-01720">12</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijms-13-01720">13</xref>], and the splicing factor Prp40 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-ijms-13-01720">14</xref>]. FF domains are small protein-protein interaction modules and their folding process includes two phases, one is a fast change from the unfolded state to intermediate state and the other is a slower, rate-limiting transition from intermediate state to the native state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-13-01720">7</xref>]. The native structures of FF domain from different proteins have been confirmed and deposited in Protein Data Bank (PDB) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijms-13-01720">12</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijms-13-01720">15</xref>]; these are composed of four helices (from <italic>N</italic>-terminal marked as H1, H2, H3 and H4, respectively) arranged in orthogonal bundle, the third helix H3 is a short 3<sub>10</sub> helix and the other three are α-helices (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1-ijms-13-01720">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<p>FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11 is a 71 amino acid residue fragment and the native structure has been determined using standard nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijms-13-01720">15</xref>]. This domain has been detected with an on-pathway intermediate state during the folding process by different experimental methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-13-01720">5</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-13-01720">7</xref>]. Because of short life-time and low population of the intermediate state under normal conditions, it is a difficult task to confirm and to characterize these states. Korzhnev DM and co-worker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-13-01720">5</xref>] studied this domain with NMR spectroscopy and found that helices H1–H3 were at least partially formed, but helix H4 was largely disordered in folding intermediate state. Jemth P. and co-worker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-ijms-13-01720">16</xref>] characterized the transition state between intermediate and native state by <italic>Φ</italic>-value analysis with 50 mutations, and declared that a folding nucleus centered at the end of H1 and the beginning of H2 came into being at this state. Dmitry M and his co-worker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijms-13-01720">17</xref>] pictured the “invisible” folding intermediate state of FF domain in detail with NMR spectroscopy and computational methods. In the intermediate state of FF domain, they found that the first two helices, H1 and H2, had a similar formation to those in the native state; the H3 was lengthened and changed into α-helix, and the H4 was badly formed. The non-native H3 prevented the formation of the native H4. The same work also indicated that the truncated FF domain with <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix being deleted was well folded and had a nearly identical structure to that of the folding intermediate state.</p>
<p>Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is an important computational technology on biomolecular systems, which detects minute changes and ascertains the dynamical properties of the systems. With the large increments in computer power, the MD simulation has become an effective method in investigating the folding and unfolding of biomolecular systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-ijms-13-01720">18</xref>–<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-ijms-13-01720">20</xref>].</p>
<p>In the present investigation, FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11 (FF3-71) and its truncated version with the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix being deleted (FF3-60), were studied by MD simulations to determine the effect of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix on the stability of the domain. The GROMACS package and GROMOS 43A1 force field were adopted together with explicit SPC water model in the simulations. The conformational changes were assessed by parameters such as the radius of gyration, root mean square deviations of Cα atoms, native contact formation, the interactions between helices and the probability of helix formation. The results indicated that the deletion of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix induced obvious conformational transitions and the truncated version became less stable than the native domain. The truncated version displayed some similar characteristics to the intermediate state.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
<title>2. Results and Discussion</title>
<p>At first, the conformational cluster analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21-ijms-13-01720">21</xref>] was carried out on the simulation trajectories of the two systems with 10 ns intervals. The RMSD value of backbone atoms was the similarity criterion with cutoff of 0.09 nm for FF3-71 and 0.1 nm for FF3-60. Only the clusters that make up 95% of a trajectory were taken into account and counted as a function of time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b22-ijms-13-01720">22</xref>]. The number of clusters did not change after 160 ns (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S1</xref>). Then, we calculated the distributions of radius of gyration (Rg) for two systems and found the distributions had no obvious changes during the last 160-ns trajectories (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S2</xref>). Finally, the conclusion could be drawn that the simulation convergence was obtained approximately. The last 160-ns simulation trajectories were taken into account for the analysis. To depict the conformational transformation, we focused on helix formation, native contact formation, root mean square deviation of Cα atoms from native state (RMSDCα), Rg, interaction of the helical interface and the spiralization or despiralization of some residues.</p>
<sec>
<title>2.1. The Root Mean Square Deviation</title>
<p>To test the structure deviation from initial conformation of the simulation, RMSDCα should be considered. We calculated RMSDCα from the native structure to analyze structural transformation caused by the deletion. The RMSDCα of the residues T13 to E57 were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2-ijms-13-01720">Figure 2</xref> as a function of simulation time together with their distributions. For FF3-71, the RMSDCα changed from 0.07 nm to 0.22 nm and the value 0.15 nm had the maximal probability of 20%. In contrast, the truncated version FF3-60 had larger RMSDCα changing from 0.29 nm to 0.46 nm and the value 0.37 nm had the maximal probability of 17%. The great difference of RMSDCα of the two systems meant the large structural difference between the two systems trajectories. The central structures of the major conformational clusters of two proteins indicated that the orientation of H1,the position of H2 relative to H3 were changed, residue 51 was spiral and the length of H3 was longer than that in FF3-71 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S3</xref>). That is to say, the deletion of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix brought the instability relative to the native partner FF3-71.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2. Helices Formation</title>
<p>In order to test the effect of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix on the formation of helices H1–H3, we calculated the probability of helical formation during the simulations. In the native state, the helical regions are 14 to 28, 36 to 45 and 47 to 51 for H1, H2 and H3 and the corresponding lengths of helix are 15, 10 and 5, respectively. The secondary structure classification was confirmed by program STRIDE [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b23-ijms-13-01720">23</xref>]. The simulation trajectories were analyzed by SPRIDE and the formation of secondary structure for each residue could be obtained. The helix formations during the simulations for each residue residing in the helices H1~H3 were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-ijms-13-01720">Figure 3</xref>. The helix formation probability of residue was the ratio of the conformation number in which this residue formed helical structure to the total conformation number. We also studied helix formation probability with different length (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S4</xref>). The length of helix was the number of residue forming helical structure in a conformation determined by program STRIDE. For instance, the <italic>N</italic>-residue helix meant there were only <italic>N</italic> residues forming the helical structures and the other residues did not form helical structures in a certain region.</p>
<p>First, the helix H1 formation was discussed. The formation probability of α-helix H1 was highlighted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-ijms-13-01720">Figure 3a</xref>. In FF3-71 most residues of H1 retained helical structure during the simulations except the <italic>C</italic>-terminal residue K28 only, with a probability of 61%. H1 was completely formed with probability of 61% and formed 14-residue helix with the probability of 38% in FF3-71 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S4</xref>). By comparison, in FF3-60 the residues E27 and K28 had less chance to form helical structure with probability of 93% and 10%, respectively. The native helix formation probability in FF3-60 was decreased to 10% and 14-resdiue helix was preferred with probability of 84%.</p>
<p>Then we took the helix H2 formation into account. The formation probability of α-helix H2 was highlighted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-ijms-13-01720">Figure 3(b)</xref>. In FF3-71 the last three residues of C-termini had no more than 40% chance to form helical structure, H2 had no chance to form the whole native helix and had the most probability of 56% for 7-residue helix (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S4</xref>). Compared with those in FF3-71, the <italic>N</italic>-terminal residues W36 had also obvious despiralization in FF3-60. H2 was preferred 6-residue helix with 56% in FF3-60 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S4</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally the helix H3 formation was analyzed. The formation probability of 3<sub>10</sub>-helix H1 was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3-ijms-13-01720">Figure 3c</xref>. No residue could keep helical structure throughout the simulations. In FF3-71, the native helix H3 was completely formed with probability of 89% and had also a 6% chance to completely disappear (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S4</xref>). In contrast, all residues in FF3-60 had less probability of forming a helical structure than those in FF3-71 and the whole native helix formation probability was decreased to 77%. H3 had 10% chance to completely disappear.</p>
<p>H3 was a 3<sub>10</sub> helix and had less stability than α-helix. Some termini residues of H1 and H2 had low probability of forming helical structures in FF3-71, which was consistent with the results of NMR experiments that the WT FF domain was conformational labile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-13-01720">5</xref>]. For FF3-71, we also compared 72 HN-O and N-O distances and 1757 hydrogen atom distances with experimental data and found that the positive violations consisted mainly of residues located in the <italic>C</italic>-terminal end of H2, H2-H3 loop and helix H3 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Supplement Figure S5 and S6</xref>). Compared with FF3-71, the helical structure formation became worse in FF3-60, especially for H3, and some termini residues of H1 and H2 were despiralized during the simulations in FF3-60. The conclusion could be obtained that the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix affected the stability of the whole H3 and the terminal residues of H1 and H2.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.3. Native Contact Formation</title>
<p>To test the changes in interactions between residues on account of deletion of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix, we calculated the native contact formation of FF3-71 and FF3-60 during the simulations. We defined a contact as being present if the Cα atom of two residues (<italic>i</italic>, <italic>j</italic> and |<italic>i</italic>−<italic>j</italic>| &gt; 2) was within 8.5 Å [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b24-ijms-13-01720">24</xref>]. Native contact was defined including all contacts which presented in 90% of conformational ensemble obtained from PDB. There were 117 native contacts obtained from residue T13 to E57 for the native state. The formations of native contact were plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4-ijms-13-01720">Figure 4</xref> for the two systems as a function of simulation time, together with their distributions. The results showed that there were only 94 native contacts being mostly formed during the simulations for the native version FF3-71 and the maximal contact number was 102. As discussed above, the FF domain might not be very stable. On the other hand, the MD method used currently required continuing refinement to reproduce the experiment results. Compared with the FF3-71, FF3-60 had much more native contacts unformed during the simulations and the native contact number being mostly formed was only 74, which was much smaller than that of the FF3-71. The deletion of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix changed the interactions among residues and some native interactions disappeared, which resulted in the instability of FF domain.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.4. The Radius of Gyration</title>
<p>The structural transformation sometimes leads to the change of compactness of structure. For a rough measure of the compactness of the structure after deletion of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix, the Rg was calculated and highlighted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5-ijms-13-01720">Figure 5</xref> together with the distribution. For FF3-71, the Rg changed from 1.01 nm to 1.09 nm and the value 1.04 nm had a maximal probability of 36%. For FF3-60, the Rg decreased and changed from 0.96 nm to 1.03 nm, and the value 1.0 nm had a maximal probability of 35.7%. The results meant that the FF3-60 was somewhat more compact than FF3-71. Namely, the truncation of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix induced the compactness of the domain. Some non-native interactions might appear in the truncated version. In the intermediate state, some non-native interactions were detected at the interface of H2 and H3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijms-13-01720">17</xref>].</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.5. H1-H3 Interface Interactions</title>
<p>The previous study indicated that the interactions formed at the H1-H3 interface comprising residues A17, A20, L24 of H1, and L52, L55 of H3 in the intermediate state were obviously different from those in the native protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijms-13-01720">17</xref>]. To test the effect of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix on the H1-H3 interface interactions, we calculated the Rg of the interface residues mentioned above and its distribution for FF3-71 and FF3-60 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6-ijms-13-01720">Figure 6</xref>). We also calculated the distances among the residues (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7-ijms-13-01720">Figure 7</xref>). The distance between two residues was defined as the distance between the two corresponding Cα atoms.</p>
<p>For FF3-71, the Rg of interface residues were changed from 0.65 nm to 0.77 nm and 0.71 nm had the maximal probability of 22%. By comparison, for FF3-60, the Rg of the interface residues were changed from 0.74 nm to 0.88 nm and 0.8 nm had the maximal probability of 16%. The region comprising interface residues became less compact in FF3-60 than that in FF3-71.</p>
<p>Totally, the distance between the interface residues in FF3-60 was larger than those in FF3-71 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7-ijms-13-01720">Figure 7</xref>). The value with maximal probability was taken into account, from FF3-71 to FF3-60, the distance of A17-L52 changed from 0.59 nm to 0.74 nm, the distance of A17-L55 changed from 1.3 nm to 1.38 nm, the distance of A20-L55 changed from 1.5 nm to 1.65 nm and the distance of L24-L52 changed from 1.17 nm to 1.48 nm. The longer distance meant the weaker interaction. The results indicated that the interactions between H1-H3 interface residues were weakened owing to the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix, which was consistent with the study on transition state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-ijms-13-01720">16</xref>].</p>
<p>Further studies of the conformations indicated that the position of H3 in relation to H1 changed, which induced the increases of the Rg and distances mentioned above. In addition, the despiralization of residue L55 (discussed in a later section), could also induce the augmentation of Rg of H1-H3 interface residue.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.6. H2-H3 Interface Interaction</title>
<p>For truncated FF3-60, NMR experiments indicated that some non-native interactions in the intermediate state were observed at the H2-H3 interface involving a hydrophobic cluster consisting of A53, Y49, and I44 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijms-13-01720">17</xref>]. To confirm whether the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix brought about these non-native interactions, we calculated the Rg of residues A53, Y49, and I44 and its distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8-ijms-13-01720">Figure 8</xref>) and the distances of I44-A53 and Y49-A53 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9-ijms-13-01720">Figure 9</xref>).</p>
<p>To take the value with the maximal probability into account, the Rg of interface residues was 0.56 nm for FF3-71 and 0.53nm for FF3-60, respectively. The reduction of Rg meant that the region comprising interface residues became compact with the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix. The distance distribution curves of I44-A53 and Y49-A53 shifted to right along distance-axis. The interactions among those residues became stronger because of the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix and some non-native interactions might have been caused. We could hypothesize that the deletion of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix might have driven the FF domain to the intermediate state.</p>
<p>With the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix, the Rg of H2-H3 interface was decreased, but the Rg of H1-H3 interface was increased. That is to say, the deletion had a different effect on different sub-structures. Without the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix, the position change of H3 in relation to H1 was detected and the angle made by H2 and H3 was varied (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s1-ijms-13-01720">Figure S3</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.7. The Spiralization and Despiralization for Some Residues</title>
<p>In intermediate state, H3 was elongated and L52 and A53, located in the turn between H3 and H4, joined H3 to form α-helix. At the same time, L55 and S56, located in the head of H4, were despiralized and formed a new turn [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijms-13-01720">17</xref>]. We calculated the probability of forming helix for L52, A53, L55 and S56 during the simulations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-13-01720">Table 1</xref>) to confirm whether the truncated version FF3-60 would change towards the intermediate state or not. The data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-13-01720">Table 1</xref> displayed that L55 and S56 were more stable in helix state in FF3-71 with probability of 99.9% and 100%, respectively. In FF3-60, the two residues had obvious despiralization tendency and the spiralization probabilities decreased to 52.1% and 58.9%. The probabilities of forming helix of L52 and A53 were 1.74% and 0.05% in FF3-60, which could not conclude that the two residues had a tendency to form helices because of the small value. However, compared with the probability of 0.05% and 0.0 in FF3-71, it was the fact that the two residues had more chance to form helical structures without the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix.</p>
<p>The despiralization of L55 and S56 meant that some characters of the intermediate state were likely to come into being in FF3-60, and the structural transformation of FF3-60 had preference towards intermediate state.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>3. Methods</title>
<p>The FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijms-13-01720">15</xref>] (PDB entry 1UZC, includes residues 3 to 71, referred to as FF3-71) and the truncated version (includes residues 3 to 60, referred to as FF3-60) were chosen to be studied. The truncated version was derived from FF3-71 with the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix (residues 61 to 71) being removed. MD simulations in the NPT ensemble were performed using the GROMACS software package [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b25-ijms-13-01720">25</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b26-ijms-13-01720">26</xref>] and GROMOS 43A1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b27-ijms-13-01720">27</xref>] force field with simple point charge (SPC) water model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b28-ijms-13-01720">28</xref>].</p>
<p>Protonation states of ionizable groups were chosen for pH 7.0 and the <italic>N</italic>- and <italic>C</italic>-terminals were amidated and acetylated, respectively. The lysine and arginine residues side chain were protonated. The systems were solvated in a rectangular box with the minimum solute-box boundary distance being set to 1.4 nm. There were 7862 and 5232 SPC water molecules for FF3-71 and FF3-60, respectively. The system was first subjected to 1000 steps of steepest descents energy minimization. To maintain neutral condition, some counter-ions were added into the two systems (7 Cl− ions for FF3-71 and 6 Cl− ions for FF3-60) to replace the same number water molecules which had the highest or lowest Coulomb potential. Another energy minimization with the steepest descents method was performed to relax the ions and water molecules. To avoid unnecessary distortion of the protein when the MD simulation was started, a 500 ps equilibration run was first performed, in which the positional restraints were imposed on the solute atoms. During the equilibration run, the temperature was raised from 50 to 300 K. The initial velocities were taken from the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at 50 K. At last, continue MD simulations were performed without any restraints at 300 K for long time. All simulations were carried out at 1 atm. The neighbor list was updated every 10 steps and the periodic boundary conditions in all directions were adopted. The cut-off distance for the short-range neighbor list was 0.9 nm. The particle-mesh Ewald method was used to treat the long-range electrostatic interaction with a grid spacing of 0.12 nm and a fourth order interpolation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b29-ijms-13-01720">29</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b30-ijms-13-01720">30</xref>]. The temperature and pressure of the system was kept constant by the Berendsen thermostat (coupling time 0.1 ps) and barostat (coupling time 0.1 ps) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b31-ijms-13-01720">31</xref>]. The time step for the MD integrator was set to 2 fs and SHAKE method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b32-ijms-13-01720">32</xref>] was applied to constrain all bond lengths with a relative tolerance of 10<sup>−4</sup>. The two independent simulations were lasted 320 ns for each system. The conformations were output every 2 ps and the last 160 ns-long trajectories were selected for the following analysis.</p>
<p>In the native state, there is a flexible <italic>N</italic>-terminal without any local regular secondary structure and the first helix starts from residue K14. For the convenience of comparison and the avoidance of the edge effects of truncating <italic>C</italic>-terminal, the segment consisting residues T13 to E57 were taken into account in the studies.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>4. Conclusions</title>
<p>FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11 is a 71-residue four-helix bundle domain. In this study, we focused on the effect of the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix on the stability of FF domain; the native state FF3-71 and its truncated version FF3-60 were studied by molecular dynamics simulations. The results indicated that the truncated version FF3-60 had obvious difference from the native partner FF3-71. The three helices H1–H3 exhibited instability and native contact number being formed during the simulation decreased obviously due to the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix. Compared with FF3-71, the truncated version FF3-60 was more compact and had larger RMSDCα. This indicated that FF domain became unstable with the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix. At the same time, without the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix, the H1-H3 interface interactions became weak and some non-native interactions had the tendency of coming into being at H2-H3 interface, and the residues L55 and S56 presented obvious despiralization. These characteristics were similar to those in intermediate state. That is, the <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix played a crucial role in the stability of the FF domain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijms-13-01720">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-ijms-13-01720">16</xref>].</p>
<p>Although it is improper to say the last 160 ns-trajectory of FF3-60 represents the intermediate ensemble of FF domain, it is a fact that the FF domain showed an obvious orientation towards the intermediate state owing to the deletion of <italic>C</italic>-terminal helix. With the elongation of the simulation time and more effective sampling methods, the intermediate state might be obtained by simulation of truncated version FF3-60.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary Information</title>
<supplementary-material id="s1-ijms-13-01720" content-type="local-data">
<media xlink:href="ijms-13-01720-s001.pdf" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="pdf"/></supplementary-material></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We would like to thank W.F. van Gunsteren (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) for providing us with the GROMOS++ programs and H.J.C. Berendsen (University of Groningen) for providing us with the GROMACS programs. This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (30970561, 31000324) and the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2009ZRA14027, 2009ZRA14028), which is gratefully acknowledged.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijms-13-01720"><label>1</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Itzhaki</surname><given-names>L.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Otzen</surname><given-names>D.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The structure of the transition state for folding of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2 analysed by protein engineering methods: Evidence for a nucleation-condensation mechanism for protein folding</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>1995</year><volume>254</volume><fpage>260</fpage><lpage>288</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmbi.1995.0616</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7490748</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijms-13-01720"><label>2</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sato</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Phi-value analysis and the nature of protein-folding transition states</article-title><source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source><year>2004</year><volume>101</volume><fpage>7976</fpage><lpage>7981</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0402684101</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15150406</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijms-13-01720"><label>3</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matouschek</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kellis</surname><given-names>J.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Serrano</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering</article-title><source>Nature</source><year>1989</year><volume>340</volume><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/340122a0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2739734</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijms-13-01720"><label>4</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whittaker</surname><given-names>S.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Spence</surname><given-names>G.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gunter Grossmann</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Radford</surname><given-names>S.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>G.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>NMR analysis of the conformational properties of the trapped on-pathway folding intermediate of the bacterial immunity protein Im7</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2007</year><volume>366</volume><fpage>1001</fpage><lpage>1015</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17188712</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijms-13-01720"><label>5</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Korzhnev</surname><given-names>D.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Religa</surname><given-names>T.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lundstrom</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>L.E.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The folding pathway of an FF domain: characterization of an on-pathway intermediate state under folding conditions by <sup>15</sup>N, <sup>13</sup>Cα and <sup>13</sup>C-methyl relaxation dispersion and <sup>1</sup>H/<sup>2</sup>H-exchange NMR spectroscopy</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2007</year><volume>372</volume><fpage>497</fpage><lpage>512</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.012</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17689561</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijms-13-01720"><label>6</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jemth</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>C.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gianni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Demonstration by burst-phase analysis of a robust folding intermediate in the FF domain</article-title><source>Protein Eng. Des. Sel</source><year>2008</year><volume>21</volume><fpage>207</fpage><lpage>214</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/protein/gzm091</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18239073</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijms-13-01720"><label>7</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jemth</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gianni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Day</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>C.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Daggett</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Demonstration of a low-energy on-pathway intermediate in a fast-folding protein by kinetics, protein engineering, and simulation</article-title><source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source><year>2004</year><volume>101</volume><fpage>6450</fpage><lpage>6455</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0401732101</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15096617</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijms-13-01720"><label>8</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neudecker</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zarrine-Afsar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Choy</surname><given-names>W.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muhandiram</surname><given-names>D.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Davidson</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>L.E.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Identification of a collapsed intermediate with non-native long-range interactions on the folding pathway of a pair of Fyn SH3 domain mutants by NMR relaxation dispersion spectroscopy</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2006</year><volume>363</volume><fpage>958</fpage><lpage>976</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.047</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16989862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijms-13-01720"><label>9</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wani</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Udgaonkar</surname><given-names>J.B.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Revealing a concealed intermediate that forms after the rate-limiting step of refolding of the SH3 domain of PI3 kinase</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2009</year><volume>387</volume><fpage>348</fpage><lpage>362</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.060</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19356591</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijms-13-01720"><label>10</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jha</surname><given-names>S.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Udgaonkar</surname><given-names>J.B.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Direct evidence for a dry molten globule intermediate during the unfolding of a small protein</article-title><source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA</source><year>2009</year><volume>106</volume><fpage>12289</fpage><lpage>12294</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0905744106</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19617531</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijms-13-01720"><label>11</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Temperature-induced partially unfolded state of hUBF HMG Box-5: conformational and dynamic investigations of the Box-5 thermal intermediate ensemble</article-title><source>Proteins</source><year>2009</year><volume>77</volume><fpage>432</fpage><lpage>447</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/prot.22454</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19452555</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ijms-13-01720"><label>12</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Murphy</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hansen</surname><given-names>D.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiesner</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muhandiram</surname><given-names>D.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Borg</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sicheri</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>L.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Forman-Kay</surname><given-names>J.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pawson</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Structural studies of FF domains of the transcription factor CA150 provide insights into the organization of FF domain tandem arrays</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2009</year><volume>393</volume><fpage>409</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2009.08.049</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19715701</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ijms-13-01720"><label>13</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabui</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Espejo</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bedford</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jacobson</surname><given-names>R.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeruzalmi</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>McMurray</surname><given-names>J.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Crystal structure of the three tandem FF domains of the transcription elongation regulator CA150</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2009</year><volume>393</volume><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>408</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.086</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19660470</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ijms-13-01720"><label>14</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonet</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramirez-Espain</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Macias</surname><given-names>M.J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Solution structure of the yeast URN1 splicing factor FF domain: comparative analysis of charge distributions in FF domain structures-FFs and SURPs, two domains with a similar fold</article-title><source>Proteins</source><year>2008</year><volume>73</volume><fpage>1001</fpage><lpage>1009</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/prot.22127</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18536009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ijms-13-01720"><label>15</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Friedler</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schon</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bycroft</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The structure of an FF domain from human HYPA/FBP11</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2002</year><volume>323</volume><fpage>411</fpage><lpage>416</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00968-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12381297</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ijms-13-01720"><label>16</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jemth</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Day</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gianni</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Allen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Daggett</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The structure of the major transition state for folding of an FF domain from experiment and simulation</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>2005</year><volume>350</volume><fpage>363</fpage><lpage>378</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2005.04.067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15935381</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ijms-13-01720"><label>17</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Korzhnev</surname><given-names>D.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Religa</surname><given-names>T.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banachewicz</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fersht</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kay</surname><given-names>L.E.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A transient and low-populated protein-folding intermediate at atomic resolution</article-title><source>Science</source><year>2010</year><volume>329</volume><fpage>1312</fpage><lpage>1316</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1191723</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20829478</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ijms-13-01720"><label>18</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shaw</surname><given-names>D.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maragakis</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindorff-Larsen</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Piana</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dror</surname><given-names>R.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eastwood</surname><given-names>M.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bank</surname><given-names>J.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jumper</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Salmon</surname><given-names>J.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shan</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins</article-title><source>Science</source><year>2010</year><volume>330</volume><fpage>341</fpage><lpage>346</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1187409</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20947758</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ijms-13-01720"><label>19</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roterman</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Konieczny</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Banach</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jurkowski</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Intermediates in the protein folding process: a computational model</article-title><source>Int. J. Mol. Sci</source><year>2011</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>4850</fpage><lpage>4860</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms11084850</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21954329</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ijms-13-01720"><label>20</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Effects of different force fields and temperatures on the Structural character of abeta (12–28) peptide in aqueous solution</article-title><source>Int. J. Mol. Sci</source><year>2011</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>8259</fpage><lpage>8274</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms12118259</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22174662</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ijms-13-01720"><label>21</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Daura</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gunsteren</surname><given-names>W.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mark</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folding-Unfolding Thermodynamics of a β-Heptapeptide From Equilibrium Simulations</article-title><source>Proteins</source><year>1999</year><volume>34</volume><fpage>269</fpage><lpage>280</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990215)34:3&lt;269::AID-PROT1&gt;3.0.CO;2-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10024015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b22-ijms-13-01720"><label>22</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jaun</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gunsteren</surname><given-names>W.F.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Folding and Unfolding of Two Mixed α/β Peptides</article-title><source>ChemBioChem</source><year>2009</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>2032</fpage><lpage>2041</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cbic.200900125</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19575368</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b23-ijms-13-01720"><label>23</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frishman</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Argos</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment</article-title><source>Proteins</source><year>1995</year><volume>23</volume><fpage>566</fpage><lpage>579</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/prot.340230412</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8749853</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b24-ijms-13-01720"><label>24</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dedmon</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lindorff-Larsen</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Christodoulou</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vendruscolo</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dobson</surname><given-names>C.M.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Mapping long-range interactions in α-synuclein using spin-label NMR and ensemble molecular dynamics simulations</article-title><source>J. Am. Chem. Soc</source><year>2005</year><volume>127</volume><fpage>476</fpage><lpage>477</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ja044834j</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15643843</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b25-ijms-13-01720"><label>25</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berendsen</surname><given-names>H.J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Spoel</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>van Drunen</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation</article-title><source>Comput. Phys. Commun</source><year>1995</year><volume>91</volume><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b26-ijms-13-01720"><label>26</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lindahl</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hess</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>van der Spoel</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>GROMACS 3.0: A package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis</article-title><source>J. Mol. Model</source><year>2001</year><volume>7</volume><fpage>306</fpage><lpage>317</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b27-ijms-13-01720"><label>27</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Gunsteren</surname><given-names>W.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Billeter</surname><given-names>S.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eising</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hünenberger</surname><given-names>P.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Krüger</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mark</surname><given-names>A.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>W.R.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tironi</surname><given-names>I.G.</given-names></name></person-group><source>Biomolecular Simulation: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide</source><publisher-name>Vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zurich</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Zurich, Switzerland</publisher-loc><year>1996</year></citation></ref>
<ref id="b28-ijms-13-01720"><label>28</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berendsen</surname><given-names>H.J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Postma</surname><given-names>J.P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gunsteren</surname><given-names>W.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hermans</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration</article-title><source>Intermolecular Forces</source><publisher-name>Reidel</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Dordrecht, The Netherlands</publisher-loc><year>1981</year><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>342</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b29-ijms-13-01720"><label>29</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darden</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>York</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pedersen</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Particle mesh Ewald: An <italic>N</italic> log(<italic>N</italic>) method for Ewald sums in large systems</article-title><source>J. Chem. Phys</source><year>1993</year><volume>98</volume><fpage>10089</fpage><lpage>10092</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.464397</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b30-ijms-13-01720"><label>30</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Essmann</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Perera</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berkowitz</surname><given-names>M.L.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A smooth particle mesh ewald method</article-title><source>J. Chem. Phys</source><year>1995</year><volume>103</volume><fpage>8577</fpage><lpage>8593</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.470117</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b31-ijms-13-01720"><label>31</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berendsen</surname><given-names>H.J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Postma</surname><given-names>J.P.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>van Gunsteren</surname><given-names>W.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dinola</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Haak</surname><given-names>J.R.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath</article-title><source>J. Chem. Phys</source><year>1984</year><volume>81</volume><fpage>3684</fpage><lpage>3690</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.448118</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b32-ijms-13-01720"><label>32</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryckaert</surname><given-names>J.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciccotti</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Berendsen</surname><given-names>H.J.C.</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of <italic>n</italic>-alkanes</article-title><source>J. Comp. Phys</source><year>1977</year><volume>23</volume><fpage>327</fpage><lpage>341</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Table</title>
<fig id="f1-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The native structure of FF domain from HYPA/FBP11 (PDB entry 1UZC, the first conformation). The four different colors were used to identify helices H1 (red), H2 (yellow), H3 (blue), and H4 (magenta).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f1.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f2-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>RMSDCα (residues T13 to E57) from native structure as a function of simulation time (left panel) and distributions (right panel) for native domain FF3-71(black line) and truncated version FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f2.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f3-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The formation of helices of two systems for residues residing in α-helix H1 (<bold>a</bold>), α-helix H2 (<bold>b</bold>) and 3<sub>10</sub>-helix H3 (<bold>c</bold>). Black square corresponds to FF3-71 and red circle corresponds to FF3-60. The helix classification was confirmed by program STRIDE. In the native state, the helical boundaries are 14 to 28, 36 to 45 and 47 to 51 and the corresponding lengths of residues are 15, 10 and 5 for H1, H2 and H3, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f3.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f4-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The native contact formation (residues 13–57) as a function of time (left panel) and distribution (right panel) during the simulations for native domain FF3-71 (black line) and truncated version FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f4.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f5-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The radius of gyration (residues 13–57) as a function of time (left panel) and distribution (right panel) during the simulations for native domain FF3-71 (black line) and truncated version FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f5.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f6-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The radius of gyration (residues A17, A20, L24 L52 and L55) as a function of time (left panel) and distribution (right panel) during the simulations for native domain FF3-71(black line) and truncated version FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f6.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f7-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>The distribution of distance between residues A17 and L52 (<bold>a</bold>), A17 and L55 (<bold>b</bold>), A20 and L55 (<bold>c</bold>), L24 and L52 (<bold>d</bold>) in FF3-71 (black line) and FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f7.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f8-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Time evolution (left panel) and distribution (right panel) of radius of gyration of residues A53, Y49, and I44 in the simulations in FF3-71 (black line) and FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f8.gif"/></fig>
<fig id="f9-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption>
<p>The distribution of distance between residues I44 and A53 (<bold>a</bold>), Y49 and A53 (<bold>b</bold>) in FF3-71 (black line) and FF3-60 (red line).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-13-01720f9.gif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-ijms-13-01720" position="float">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The spiralization probability for L52, A53, L55 and S56.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">System</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">F<sub>L52</sub> (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">F<sub>A53</sub> (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">F<sub>L55</sub> (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">F<sub>S56</sub> (%)</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">FF3-71</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">99.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">100</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">FF3-60</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.74</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">0.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">52.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">58.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
