<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ijms</journal-id>
<journal-title>International Journal of Molecular Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1422-0067</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms10010018</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ijms-10-00018</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group>
<subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Isolation and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers for Yellow Perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>)</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>Aibin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-10-00018">1</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Yao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-ijms-10-00018">2</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>Bonnie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-ijms-10-00018">3</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Han-Ping</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-ijms-10-00018">1</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="C1">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group>
<aff id="af1-ijms-10-00018">
<label>1</label>Aquaculture Genetics and Breeding Laboratory, Ohio State University Aquaculture Research and Development Integration Program, 1864 Shyville Road, Piketon, Ohio 45661, USA. E-Mail:
<email>zhan.7@osu.edu</email></aff>
<aff id="af2-ijms-10-00018">
<label>2</label>Department of Chemical &amp; Biomolecular Engineering, Ohio State University, 140 West 19th Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. E-Mail:
<email>wang.934@osu.edu</email></aff>
<aff id="af3-ijms-10-00018">
<label>3</label>Ecological Genetics Laboratory, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284, USA. E-Mail:
<email>blbrown@vcu.edu</email></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="C1">*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail:
<email>wang900@ag.osu.edu</email>; Tel. +1-740-289-2071; Fax: +1-740-289-7491</corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<month>1</month>
<year>2009</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year></pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>18</fpage>
<lpage>27</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2008</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2008</year></date></history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>© 2009 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (<ext-link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" ext-link-type="uri">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link>).</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2009</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<p>This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (<ext-link xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" ext-link-type="uri">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link>).</p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<p>To perform whole genome scanning for complex trait analysis, we isolated and characterized a total of 21 novel genomic-SSRs and EST-SSRs for yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>), using the methods of construction of SSR-enrichment libraries and EST database mining of a related species <italic>P. fluviatilis</italic>. Of 16 genomic-SSR primer pairs examined, eight successfully amplified scorable products. The number of alleles at these informative loci varied from 3 – 14 with an average of 8.5 alleles per locus. When tested on wild perch from a population in Pennsylvania, observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.07 – 0.81 and from 0.37 – 0.95, respectively. Of 2,226 EST sequences examined, only 110 (4.93%) contained microsatellites and for those, 13 markers were tested, 12 of which exhibited polymorphism. Compared with genomic-SSRs, EST-SSRs exhibited a lower level of genetic variability with the number of alleles of averaging only 2.6 alleles per locus. Cross-species utility indicated that three of the genomic-SSRs and eight of the EST-SSRs successfully cross-amplified in a related species, the walleye (<italic>Sander vitreus</italic>).</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Microsatellite</kwd>
<kwd>genomic-SSRs</kwd>
<kwd>EST-SSRs</kwd>
<kwd>yellow perch <italic>Perca flavescens</italic></kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>, Mitchell 1814), widely distributed in fresh waters of the USA and Canada, is an important ecological and aquacultural species, especially in the Great Lakes Region and the Midwestern states of the U.S. This species has been considered one of the most flavorful species among all panfish and carries special advantages in exhibiting a mild taste and firm flesh with low fat and phospholipid content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-ijms-10-00018">1</xref>]. Due to commercial and recreational overexploitation, harvests have declined since the 1990s. To supply continued high market demand, breeding programs such as O’GIFT (Ohio Genetic Improvement of Farmed-fish Traits) have been launched to improve growth rate and disease resistance of yellow perch. Further investigation of these and other important multigenic traits depends on the availability of molecular genetic markers and use of such markers in efficient breeding programs (e.g. marker assisted selection).</p>
<p>Microsatellite analysis based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) offers the finest resolution to date for studying molecular variation in perch. Most of the microsatellite DNA markers are Type II markers, which are developed from anonymous genomic sequences. Previously, Type II markers were isolated and characterized to perform the landscape genetic analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-ijms-10-00018">2</xref>] and to evaluate broodstock populations of yellow perch [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-ijms-10-00018">3</xref>]. Comparatively, Type I markers, which are associated with genes of known functions, are more useful for comparative genome mapping [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-ijms-10-00018">4</xref>]. Type I markers often serve as anchorage points for genomic segments. Lack of Type I markers in yellow perch and many other aquaculture species has hindered major progress in genomics and genetic studies in aquatic animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-ijms-10-00018">4</xref>]. Although an amount of Type II microsatellite DNA markers were developed for yellow perch, the number of markers is still insufficient for planned QTL analysis of traits such as growth or disease resistance. To increase the numbers of independent simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci available for genomic studies in <italic>Perca flavescens</italic>, we evaluated loci from several microsatellite-enriched libraries and mined online cDNA databases as suggested by a number of researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-10-00018">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-ijms-10-00018">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-10-00018">7</xref>]. Of particular interest was whether microsatellite markers developed from expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences (i.e. Type I markers) of species related to <italic>P. flavescens</italic> would be sufficiently polymorphic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijms-10-00018">8</xref>].</p>
<p>In the present study, we report bioinformatic mining of the EST database of a related species, European perch (<italic>Perca fluviatilis</italic>), from which we developed polymorphic EST microsatellites for yellow perch. The rates of polymorphism recorded for these markers, both genomic and EST microsatellites, were evaluated by genotyping 30 individuals sampled from a wild population. Additionally, the cross utility of these markers was tested in a related species, the walleye (<italic>Sander vitreus</italic>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2. Experimental Section</title>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>2.1. EST database mining</title>
<p>To develop EST-SSRs for yellow perch, European perch EST sequences were obtained from GenBank dbEST (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST/index.html" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbEST/index.html</ext-link>). All data were scanned using the software SSR Hunter version 1.3 (<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.biosoft.net/dna/SSRHunter.htm" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.biosoft.net/dna/SSRHunter.htm</ext-link>) using search parameters set to more than seven repetitions for di-nucleotide repeats, five for tri-, four for tetra-, and three for penta-and hexanucleotide repeats.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2. Microsatellite-enriched library construction</title>
<p>Microsatellite-enriched libraries were conducted using the method described by Li <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-ijms-10-00018">3</xref>]. Briefly, the genomic DNA isolated from fin tissue was digested with a restriction enzyme <italic>Sau</italic>3A at 37°C for 3 hours. The fragments with the size range of 0.5 – 2 kb were recovered from an agarose gel. A synthesized adaptor SAUL (A: 5′-GCGGTACCCGGGAAGCTTGG-3′ and B: 5′-GATCCCAAGCTTCCCGGGTACCGC-3′) was ligated to the fragments using T4 DNA ligase. Microsatellite-containing fragments were selectively coupled to biotinylated repeat motifs [(CA)<sub>n</sub>, (GT)<sub>n</sub>, (AAC)<sub>11</sub>, (GAAT)<sub>10</sub>, (ACAT)<sub>11</sub>, (AAAG)<sub>11</sub>, (GTA)<sub>15</sub>, and (AAT)<sub>15</sub>], captured, and washed. Fragments containing microsatellites were ligated to a TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and transformed into competent <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> cells. Positive clones were selected for PCR amplification using M13 universal primers and the PCR products were sequenced.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>2.3. Sequence analysis and primer design</title>
<p>To exclude duplicates, all sequences, including genomic and EST sequences, were subjected to BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor Software for grouping clusters using multiple sequence alignment. Microsatellites with the same flanking regions were considered as the same loci. The independent sequences were submitted to the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) for homology searches using BLASTN (<ext-link xlink:href="http://blast.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/top-e.html" ext-link-type="uri">http://blast.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/top-e.html</ext-link>) against the vertebrate DNA databases to exclude loci previously reported. Sequences with the longest perfect repeats and flanking regions were selected for PCR primer design (Primer Premier version 5.0 software; <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.PremierBiosoft.com/faq.html" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.PremierBiosoft.com/faq.html</ext-link>). One primer of each primer pair was modified at the 5′-end with an M13 universal tail (5′-CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′) as described by Boutin <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-ijms-10-00018">9</xref>].</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.4. DNA extraction, PCR amplification and genotyping</title>
<p>A total of 30 adult yellow perch were collected live from a wild population in Lake Wallenpaupack in Pennsylvania, U.S. Individual fin-clips were stored immediately into 95% ethanol. For each specimen, DNA was extracted from 50 mg of tissue according to the methods described by Waters <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-ijms-10-00018">10</xref>]. Amplification of microsatellite loci was performed with three primers, the tailed primer, the nontailed primer, and the M13 universal 5′-labelled (FAM, TET, or NED) primer that contained the same sequence as the M13 universal tail. The PCR reaction mix contained approximately 50 ng of genomic DNA, 3 μL of JumpStart RedMix (Sigma), 1.5 pmol of both nontailed and labelled primers, 0.1 pmol of the tailed primer, and 100 μM of spermidine in a total volume of 6 μL. The PCR conditions were programmed as one cycle of denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 30s at 95°C, 30s at locus-specific annealing temperature (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>), and 45s at 72°C, ending with a final step at 72°C for 5 min. Amplification products were separated using an ABI 3130 Prism DNA genetic analyzer and the genotyping results were analyzed using Genemap® 4.0 software.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>2.5. Genetic data analysis</title>
<p>For a certain locus, the allele size range (<italic>S</italic>) was directly obtained from the Genemap® 4.0 software. The number of alleles (<italic>A</italic>) and their frequency (<italic>F</italic>), the observed heterozygosity (<italic>H<sub>o</sub></italic>) and the expected heterozygosity (<italic>H<sub>e</sub></italic>) were calculated using the computer program POPGENE 32. The Markov chain method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-ijms-10-00018">11</xref>] was used to estimate the probability of significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and pairwise tests for linkage disequilibrium (LD) were performed using the program GENEPOP online version (<ext-link xlink:href="http://genepop.curtin.edu.au/" ext-link-type="uri">http://genepop.curtin.edu.au/</ext-link>) using the default parameters. Significance criteria were adjusted for the number of simultaneous tests using Bonferroni correction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b12-ijms-10-00018">12</xref>].</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.6. Cross utility</title>
<p>To determine the potential for cross utility, amplification of the identified markers was assessed in one related species, the walleye (<italic>Sander vitreus</italic>). The same PCR conditions and genotyping methods were used as described above except that annealing temperature was re-optimized at each locus.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
<title>3. Results and Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>3.1. Genomic-SSRs</title>
<p>A total of 16 sequences derived from the microsatellite-enriched libraries were selected for primer design. The optimization results showed that eight primer pairs could successfully amplify target fragments of the expected sizes. All eight loci exhibited polymorphism in the individuals tested. The numbers of alleles varied from 3 – 14 with an average of 8.5 alleles per locus. The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.07 to 0.81 and from 0.20 to 0.95, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>). None of the loci showed significant linkage disequilibrium. After sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, five loci were found to depart significantly from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). To exclude the impact of short allele dominance (large allele dropout), data were subject to analysis with Micro-Checker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-ijms-10-00018">13</xref>]. No evidence for large allele drop-out was found for any of the loci. Further tests indicated that heterozygote deficiency at these loci was responsible for the departure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>). Another possible explanation for the departure from HWE is the dramatic contemporary decline in spawning populations, and consequent non-random mating and genetic bottlenecks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-ijms-10-00018">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-ijms-10-00018">15</xref>]. A final possibility is subpopulation structure which cannot be ruled out without further analysis.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.2. EST-SSRs</title>
<p>In the process of EST database mining, a total of 2,226 EST sequences were deposited in GenBank. The mining results showed that 110 (4.93%) sequences contained microsatellites that conformed to our mining criteria (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2-ijms-10-00018">Table 2</xref>). As found in other species, di-nucleotide repeats were the most abundant, accounting for 73.64% of all repeats located. This ratio is much higher than has been reported for some other aquatic species such as shrimp, bivalves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-10-00018">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-ijms-10-00018">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-ijms-10-00018">16</xref>], and other freshwater fish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-10-00018">7</xref>]. Surprisingly, the most abundant di-nucleotide repeat type was AG/CT, which is not consistent with reported findings for other fish such as common carp <italic>Cyprinus carpio</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-ijms-10-00018">7</xref>], pufferfish <italic>Fugu rubripes</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-ijms-10-00018">17</xref>] and catfish <italic>Ictalurus punctatus</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b18-ijms-10-00018">18</xref>] where, in general, the AC/GT repeat type is the most abundant di-nucleotide microsatellite. Similar to our findings, whole genome scanning has indicated that AG/CT is the most abundant type in some aquatic animals such as scallop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b19-ijms-10-00018">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-ijms-10-00018">20</xref>]. Biased sampling, due primarily to the small number of EST sequences examined in this study, may explain the current findings. To further confirm or refine the observation for yellow perch, more sequences or whole genome scanning are needed.</p>
<p>Twenty-three EST-derived sequences were chosen for PCR primer design. Among them, 13 primer pairs (56.5%) amplified products of the expected size. The presence of long introns between primers in genomic DNA, primer sequences spanning across introns and/or mutations, and indels (insertions or deletions) in the primer annealing sites between the two perch species may explain the non-amplification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-ijms-10-00018">5</xref>]. However, the success ratio we observed for EST-derived microsatellites is slightly higher than those in other studies using the same strategy, such as development of Japanese sea urchin (<italic>Strongylocentrotus intermedius</italic>) using the EST sequences of a related species of purple sea urchin (<italic>S. purpuratus</italic>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-ijms-10-00018">8</xref>].</p>
<p>Although we selected relatively long microsatellite regions, the polymorphism assessment results revealed low levels of genetic diversity at these loci. Two or three alleles were detected at most loci and only one locus displayed 5 alleles in the individuals tested (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>). Similarly low genetic diversity was also observed in terms of heterozygosity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>). In previous studies where levels of polymorphism have been compared between Type I and Type II microsatellite DNA markers in the same species, the level of polymorphism of Type I markers has usually been observed to be slightly lower [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b20-ijms-10-00018">20</xref>] but not nearly so dramatic as the differences we observed in polymorphism between EST-SSRs and genomic-SSRs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>). Evolutionary conservation and lower mutation rates within gene-coding sequences is a possible explanation for our observation but does not account for the prior published results. The practical implications are as described by Eujayl <italic>et al</italic>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b21-ijms-10-00018">21</xref>], that a suite of more mutationally-stable EST-SSRs could complement highly variable genomic-SSRs to reconstruct past evolutionary events and to identify regions of genomes that are identical by descent. This would be of particular utility in genomic, gene mapping, and QTL studies across species within <italic>Perca</italic>.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.3. Cross utility</title>
<p>Of eight genomic-SSRs and 12 EST-SSRs, three (37.5%) and eight (66.7%) loci were successfully cross-amplified in the walleye (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1-ijms-10-00018">Table 1</xref>), respectively. The cross utility results confirmed that Type I microsatellite markers have higher success ratio than that of Type II microsatellites in the cross-species amplifications among closely-related species. Although the walleye belongs to a different genus, the high cross-amplification ratio was also observed at both genomic-SSR and EST-SSR loci.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>4. Conclusions</title>
<p>In the present study, a total of 21 novel genomic-SSRs and EST-SSRs for yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>) were developed using the methods of construction of SSR-enrichment libraries and EST database mining of a related species. Compared with the genomic-SSRs, the EST-SSRs for yellow perch displayed a relatively lower level of genetic variability not only in number of alleles but also in heterozygosity. As described in other publications, mining EST databases provides an efficient and low-cost approach to obtaining new microsatellite markers for species of interest. Furthermore, the results also demonstrated the feasibility of microsatellite marker development by EST database mining of a genetically related species in fish.</p></sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>This study was supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2005-38879-02357 and 2006-38879-03684. Salaries and research support were provided by state and federal funds appropriated to The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. We thank Hong Yao for genotyping.</p></ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="b1-ijms-10-00018"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malison</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><source>A white paper on the status and needs of yellow perch aquaculture in the North Carolina regions</source><publisher-name>North Central Regional Aquaculture Center, Michigan State University</publisher-name><publisher-loc>East Lansing, Michigan, USA</publisher-loc></citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-ijms-10-00018"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leclerc</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Wirth</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernatchez</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>), and cross-species amplification within the family Percidae</article-title><source>Mol. Ecol. Notes</source><year>2000</year><volume>9</volume><fpage>995</fpage><lpage>997</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00939-3.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-ijms-10-00018"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name><name><surname>Givens</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Czesny</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isolation and characterization of microsatellites in yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>)</article-title><source>Mol. Ecol. Notes</source><year>2007</year><volume>7</volume><fpage>600</fpage><lpage>603</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01645.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-ijms-10-00018"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Serapion</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kucuktas</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bioinformatic mining of type I microsatellites from expressed sequence tags of Channel catfish (<italic>Ictalurus punctatus</italic>)</article-title><source>Mar. Biotechnol</source><year>2004</year><volume>6</volume><fpage>364</fpage><lpage>377</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10126-003-0039-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15136916</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-ijms-10-00018"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>ZM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>XL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Microsatellite markers derived from bay scallop <italic>Argopecten irradians</italic> expressed sequence tags</article-title><source>Fish. Sci</source><year>2005</year><volume>71</volume><fpage>1341</fpage><lpage>1346</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01100.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-ijms-10-00018"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>XL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>ZM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Zhikong scallop by screening SSR-enriched library</article-title><source>J. Fish. China</source><year>2008</year><volume>32</volume><fpage>353</fpage><lpage>361</lpage><comment>(in Chinese with English abstract)</comment></citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-ijms-10-00018"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Tong</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development of novel EST-SSR markers in common carp by data mining from public EST sequences</article-title><source>Aquaculture</source><year>2007</year><volume>271</volume><fpage>558</fpage><lpage>574</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.06.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-ijms-10-00018"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>ZC</given-names></name><name><surname>Zou</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>CB</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>WD</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Characterization of 28 polymorphic microsatellites for Japanese sea urchin (<italic>Strongylocentrotus intermedius</italic>) via mining EST database of a related species (<italic>S. purpuratus</italic>)</article-title><source>Ann. Zool. Fenn</source><year>2008</year><volume>45</volume><fpage>181</fpage><lpage>184</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5735/086.045.0303</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-ijms-10-00018"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boutin-Ganache</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Raposo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Raymond</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analysis performed with two different allele sizing methods</article-title><source>BioTechniques</source><year>2001</year><volume>31</volume><fpage>24</fpage><lpage>28</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11464515</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-ijms-10-00018"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waters</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Epifanio</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Gunter</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Homing behaviour facilitates subtle population differentiation among river populations of <italic>Alosa sapidissima</italic>: Microsatellites and mtDNA</article-title><source>J. Fish Bio</source><year>2000</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>622</fpage><lpage>636</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00760.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-ijms-10-00018"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles</article-title><source>Biometrics</source><year>1992</year><volume>48</volume><fpage>361</fpage><lpage>372</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2532296</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1637966</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-ijms-10-00018"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rice</surname><given-names>WR</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Analyzing tables of statistical tests</article-title><source>Evolution</source><year>1989</year><volume>43</volume><fpage>223</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2409177</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-ijms-10-00018"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Oosterhout</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Hutchinson</surname><given-names>WF</given-names></name><name><surname>Wills</surname><given-names>DPM</given-names></name><name><surname>Shipley</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Micro-checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data</article-title><source>Mol. Ecol. Notes</source><year>2004</year><volume>4</volume><fpage>535</fpage><lpage>538</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-ijms-10-00018"><label>14.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>HP</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Givens</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Wallat</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Yellow perch strain evaluation I: Genetic variation of six brood stock populations</article-title><source>Aquaculture</source><year>2007</year><volume>271</volume><fpage>142</fpage><lpage>151</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.06.022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-ijms-10-00018"><label>15.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leclerc</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Mailhot</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Mingelbier</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bernatchez</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The landscape genetics of yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>) in a large fluvial ecosystem</article-title><source>Mol. Ecol</source><year>2008</year><volume>17</volume><fpage>1702</fpage><lpage>1717</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03710.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18331242</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-ijms-10-00018"><label>16.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development and characterization of EST-SSR markers in the eastern oyster <italic>Crassostrea virginica</italic></article-title><source>Mar. Biotechnol</source><year>2008</year><volume>9</volume><fpage>500</fpage><lpage>511</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-ijms-10-00018"><label>17.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names>YJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Elgar</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bishop</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The identification and haracterization of microsatellites in the compact genome of the Japanese pufferfish, <italic>Fugu rubripes</italic>: erspectives in functional and comparative genomic analyses</article-title><source>J. Mol. Biol</source><year>1998</year><volume>278</volume><fpage>843</fpage><lpage>854</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmbi.1998.1752</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9614946</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b18-ijms-10-00018"><label>18.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Serapion</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kucuktas</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>JN</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>ZJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Bioinformatic mining of type I microsatellites from expressed sequence tags of channel catfish (<italic>Ictalurus punctatus</italic>)</article-title><source>Mar. Biotechnol</source><year>2004</year><volume>6</volume><fpage>364</fpage><lpage>377</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10126-003-0039-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15136916</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b19-ijms-10-00018"><label>19.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>XL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>ZM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Initial analysis of tandemly repetitive sequences in the genome of Zhikong scallop (<italic>Chlamys farreri</italic> Jones et Preston)</article-title><source>DNA sequence</source><year>2007</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>205</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="b20-ijms-10-00018"><label>20.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhan</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>ZM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>XL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>CZ</given-names></name><name><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>ZQ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Characterization of 95 novel microsatellite markers for Zhikong scallop Chlamys farreri using FIASCO-colony hybridization and EST database mining</article-title><source>Fish. Sci</source><year>2008</year><volume>74</volume><fpage>516</fpage><lpage>526</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01554.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="b21-ijms-10-00018"><label>21.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eujayl</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Sorrells</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Baum</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Wolters</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Powell</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Isolation of EST-derived microsatellite markers for genotyping the A and B genomes of wheat</article-title><source>Theor. Appl. Genet</source><year>2002</year><volume>104</volume><fpage>399</fpage><lpage>407</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s001220100738</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12582712</pub-id></citation></ref></ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Tables</title>
<table-wrap id="t1-ijms-10-00018" position="float">
<label>Table 1.</label>
<caption>
<p>Characterization of genomic-SSRs and EST-SSRs for yellow perch (<italic>Perca flavescens</italic>).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="center">Locus name Accession</th>
<th align="center">Primer sequence (5′-3′)</th>
<th align="center"><italic>T</italic><italic>a</italic></th>
<th align="center">Repeats</th>
<th align="center"><italic>S</italic> (bp)</th>
<th align="center"><italic>A</italic></th>
<th align="center"><italic>H</italic><italic>o</italic></th>
<th align="center"><italic>H</italic><italic>e</italic></th>
<th align="center"><italic>P</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center">Cross utility (<italic>T</italic><italic>a</italic>; <italic>A</italic>)</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/> FJ547096</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-TTGGACAAAAATAACTCACT
<break/>R: AGAGTAGAAATGCGGTTGCT</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(TTC)<sub>16</sub></td>
<td align="center">180–210</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">0.8077</td>
<td align="center">0.8620</td>
<td align="center">0.8312</td>
<td align="center">52; 3</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP72<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547097</td>
<td align="left">F: AAAGAGAGCAAAGGGGAAGA
<break/>R: M13-TGTGTAAGAAACAGGCAGGT</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(GGT)<sub>5</sub>GAA (GGT)<sub>5</sub>GAA(GGT)<sub>16</sub></td>
<td align="center">255–264</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">0.3846</td>
<td align="center">0.4970</td>
<td align="center">0.4615</td>
<td align="center">54; 2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547098</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-CCGGCTACTTCATGTTAAAA
<break/>R: GTGGGAATAAGGGTTAGGCT</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(AGAT)<sub>14</sub></td>
<td align="center">331–387</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">0.5185</td>
<td align="center">0.9371</td>
<td align="center">0.0093<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP89<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547099</td>
<td align="left">F: ATGGAGATTTACAGCCCCTA
<break/>R: M13-ACTAATAACCACCATCCTGC</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(CA)<sub>5</sub>GA(CA)<sub>18</sub></td>
<td align="center">191–227</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">0.1238</td>
<td align="center">0.6260</td>
<td align="center">0.0000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP90<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547100</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-AGAAAAGAGGGAAAGAAGG
<break/>R: CCGCTATTTCACTCTGTTTT</td>
<td align="center">52</td>
<td align="center">(GAAA)<sub>16</sub></td>
<td align="center">123–171</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
<td align="center">0.5556</td>
<td align="center">0.7596</td>
<td align="center">0.8084</td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547101</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-TTCACATTCAATAGGAGTAGAGT
<break/>R: CTGTAAAACCATTGCCGATAAA</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">(ACAT)<sub>15</sub></td>
<td align="center">331–407</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">0.0714</td>
<td align="center">0.8331</td>
<td align="center">0.0003<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547102</td>
<td align="left">F: GTGCCCTTTGTCACCCAT
<break/>R: M13-GCCCTCATTTATGTCTCTCC</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(CA)<sub>14</sub></td>
<td align="center">127–133</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">0.0870</td>
<td align="center">0.3710</td>
<td align="center">0.0001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">52; 1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">YP105<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">†</xref>
<break/>FJ547103</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-TAGAAGCAAAACCCGTGA
<break/>R: TGTCCCTCACCAGCCAGT</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(CTA)<sub>14</sub></td>
<td align="center">169–214</td>
<td align="center">14</td>
<td align="center">0.4815</td>
<td align="center">0.9511</td>
<td align="center">0.0028<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DR730576</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-CTCCCAAAATAAAGCCAATGTC
<break/>R: ACAGAGTTTCAGGCACTTGTGG</td>
<td align="center">54</td>
<td align="center">(TC)<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center">250–268</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0714</td>
<td align="center">0.0701</td>
<td align="center">0.8907</td>
<td align="center">54; 2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DR730639</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-GCAGAAATGCTACATAGATCCT
<break/>R: AGTCAATATCCTCCAAATGTGC</td>
<td align="center">52</td>
<td align="center">(GT)<sub>16</sub></td>
<td align="center">124–136</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">0.5714</td>
<td align="center">0.5396</td>
<td align="center">0.8719</td>
<td align="center">50; 3</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE06#
<break/>DV671343</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-TTGCCTGAGGTTGTATTGAGAA
<break/>R: ACAGTCGTAGCAGAGGGTCAC</td>
<td align="center">52</td>
<td align="center">(AG)7</td>
<td align="center">164–176</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">1.0000</td>
<td align="center">52; 2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE07<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DV671312</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-CGGCACGAGGGGACTGTAATC
<break/>R: TGTGCTCTTTCCCTTGTGACCG</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">(AAC)<sub>6</sub></td>
<td align="center">109–121</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">0.1045</td>
<td align="center">0.0018<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">54; 1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE08<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DV671070</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-GTCTTAAACAAGTCTTCATAGCAC
<break/>R: GGACAGAGAACACATAGAGAATC</td>
<td align="center">56</td>
<td align="center">(TAA)<sub>11</sub></td>
<td align="center">160–168</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">1.0000</td>
<td align="center">50; 1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE11<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DW985750</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-CTTAGACAGACCGACCTACAG
<break/>R: ATGTCAGCCAAGATGTAATG</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">(TGA)<sub>12</sub></td>
<td align="center">220–223</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">1.0000</td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE12<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DV752650</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-TGCGTGCCAAGGGCGGTGTT
<break/>R: CCGTCCCCTCAACAAATACC</td>
<td align="center">54</td>
<td align="center">(CCT)<sub>5</sub></td>
<td align="center">131–149</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">0.0708</td>
<td align="center">0.0018<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">54; 1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE14<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DV671188</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-AGCCACAAAGCTGAACATAG
<break/>R: TGCCATGTTGTATCTCCCAC</td>
<td align="center">52</td>
<td align="center">(AT)<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center">258–264</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">0.1429</td>
<td align="center">0.1351</td>
<td align="center">0.7270</td>
<td align="center">50; 1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE15<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DR731110</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-GTATTAGTCTATGTATATTGCC
<break/>R: CGGGATGTCACTTACTTCTC</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
<td align="center">(TATC)<sub>17</sub></td>
<td align="center">292–296</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">0.0357</td>
<td align="center">1.0000</td>
<td align="center">50; 1</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE19<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DV671307</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-TGTCTAACGATTGCTTTTCCT
<break/>R: CAATGAAAAATAAACATGCGTGACC</td>
<td align="center">56</td>
<td align="center">(AT)<sub>10</sub></td>
<td align="center">80–82</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0000</td>
<td align="center">0.0701</td>
<td align="center">0.0016<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE20<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DR731052</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-GATCCATCCTGCTCAGACTC
<break/>R: AAGAGATTGAGTTTGGTAGC</td>
<td align="center">56</td>
<td align="center">(TC)<sub>23</sub></td>
<td align="center">281–283</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0.0000</td>
<td align="center">0.0701</td>
<td align="center">0.0016<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PFE22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">#</xref>
<break/>DR730585</td>
<td align="left">F: M13-ATACAGAGGCCTTCATTTGT
<break/>R: CAGCTACAGTTCATTCTACCT</td>
<td align="center">56</td>
<td align="center">(TA)<sub>9</sub></td>
<td align="center">280–282</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">0.0714</td>
<td align="center">0.0701</td>
<td align="center">0.8907</td>
<td align="center">—</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><fn id="tfn1-ijms-10-00018">
<p><italic>T<sub>a</sub></italic>: annealing temperature (°C); <italic>S</italic>: allele size range (M13 universal tail included);</p></fn><fn id="tfn2-ijms-10-00018">
<p><italic>A</italic>: number of alleles;</p></fn><fn id="tfn3-ijms-10-00018">
<p><italic>H<sub>o</sub></italic>: observed heterozygosity;</p></fn><fn id="tfn4-ijms-10-00018">
<p><italic>H<sub>e</sub></italic>: expected heterozygosity;</p></fn><fn id="tfn5-ijms-10-00018">
<p><italic>P</italic>-value: <italic>P</italic>-values for exact test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE); M13: universal M13 tail (5′-CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′);</p></fn><fn id="tfn6-ijms-10-00018">
<p>Cross utility: primers cross amplified for the walleye (<italic>Sander vitreus</italic>) (<italic>N</italic> = 4);</p></fn><fn id="tfn7-ijms-10-00018">
<label><sup>#</sup>:</label>
<p>EST-SSRs developed for yellow perch;</p></fn><fn id="tfn8-ijms-10-00018">
<label><sup>†</sup>:</label>
<p>genomic-SSRs derived from microsatellite-enriched library;</p></fn><fn id="tfn9-ijms-10-00018">
<label><sup>*</sup>:</label>
<p>departure from HWE after Bonferroni correction.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t2-ijms-10-00018" position="float">
<label>Table 2.</label>
<caption>
<p>The fates of EST sequences of European perch (<italic>Perca fluviatilis</italic>) used for Type I marker development for yellow perch (<italic>P. flavescens</italic>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ijms-10-00018t1.gif"/></table-wrap></sec></back></article>
