Next Article in Journal
Unearthing the “Polonskis”: A Historian’s Odyssey in Family Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Using Foucault: Genealogy, Governmentality and the Problem of Chronic Illness
Previous Article in Journal
Constructing Masculinity through Genetic Legacies: Family Histories, Y-Chromosomes, and “Viking Identities”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Emancipating Intellectual Property from Proprietarianism: Drahos, Foucault, and a Quasi-Genealogy of IP
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Genealogy 2018, 2(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy2010009

On the Genealogy of Kitsch and the Critique of Ideology: A Reflection on Method

Centre for Aristotelian Studies and Critical Theory, Mykolas Romeris University, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania
Received: 17 January 2018 / Revised: 10 February 2018 / Accepted: 11 February 2018 / Published: 17 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Political Genealogy after Foucault)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [223 KB, uploaded 22 February 2018]

Abstract

This paper examines similarities and differences between the genealogical approach to social critique and the Marxist critique of ideology. Given the key methodological aspects of Michel Foucault’s genealogy—the fusion of power and discourse and the Nietzschean notion of the aesthetization of life—the paper argues that Hollywood kitsch maybe interpreted as a new dispositif. A key task of the genealogy of kitsch is to analyze the effects of fake Hollywood narratives: how they form and normalize us, what kind of subjectivities they produce, and what type of social relations they create. La La Land, a 2016 American musical, is discussed as a way of illustration. Theorists of the Frankfurt School also advanced their critiques of the popular culture and its forms of kitsch; yet they followed Marx and his conception of ideology. The paper concludes that the differences between genealogy and the critique of ideology are philosophical. Foucault rejected the Marxist conception of history and the notion of ideology as false consciousness. Kitsch, for a genealogist, is formative rather than repressive; it makes people pursue banal dreams. For a Marxist critic, popular culture as a form of ideology dulls our critical capacities and, therefore, leaves the status quo of alienation intact. View Full-Text
Keywords: Foucault; genealogy; kitsch; critique of ideology; Marx; power; discourse; Hollywood Foucault; genealogy; kitsch; critique of ideology; Marx; power; discourse; Hollywood
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bielskis, A. On the Genealogy of Kitsch and the Critique of Ideology: A Reflection on Method. Genealogy 2018, 2, 9.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Genealogy EISSN 2313-5778 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top