Next Article in Journal
Effect of Auxins and Associated Metabolic Changes on Cuttings of Hybrid Aspen
Next Article in Special Issue
Decision Support System for Adaptive Regional-Scale Forest Management by Multiple Decision-Makers
Previous Article in Journal
A Tree Species Effect on Soil That Is Consistent Across the Species’ Range: The Case of Aspen and Soil Carbon in North America
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Participatory Decision Support Systems in Forest Management

by
Montserrat Acosta
1 and
Serafín Corral
2,*
1
Department of Techniques and Projects in Engineering and Architecture, University of La Laguna, 38200 Canary Islands, Spain
2
CEDESOG-Department of Applied Economics and Qualitative Methods, University of La Laguna, 38200 Canary Islands, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2017, 8(4), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040116
Submission received: 17 February 2017 / Revised: 5 April 2017 / Accepted: 5 April 2017 / Published: 10 April 2017

Abstract

Growing concern about issues such as environmental quality or the sustainability of natural resources has led to the use of the Decision Support System (DSS), which originated in the business field, and is now part of environmental decision-making processes. The presence of environmental, social, or economic dimensions has helped decision support systems to evolve to be able to tackle investigations that can contemplate all these variables, such as in the case of multicriteria decision analyses. In addition, new lifestyles, in which society recognizes more and more the contribution of forests to its welfare, have led to the need to involve stakeholders in decision-making processes. This article presents a review of different Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) and participatory decision support systems applied to forest environments. This last point is presented from the perspective of stakeholder participation in the processes and from the point of view of procedures or tools used. To do this, some of the research performed in forest environments within this current century is reviewed.
Keywords: DSS; MCDA; forest management; stakeholders’ participation; integrated assessment DSS; MCDA; forest management; stakeholders’ participation; integrated assessment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acosta, M.; Corral, S. Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Participatory Decision Support Systems in Forest Management. Forests 2017, 8, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040116

AMA Style

Acosta M, Corral S. Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Participatory Decision Support Systems in Forest Management. Forests. 2017; 8(4):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acosta, Montserrat, and Serafín Corral. 2017. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Participatory Decision Support Systems in Forest Management" Forests 8, no. 4: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040116

APA Style

Acosta, M., & Corral, S. (2017). Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Participatory Decision Support Systems in Forest Management. Forests, 8(4), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040116

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop