Next Article in Journal
In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of the Effects of Drug 2c and Derivatives on Ovarian Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation into the Effects of Processing Factors on the Properties and Scaling-Up Potential of Propranolol-Loaded Chitosan Nanogels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceutics
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/pharmaceutics16050663
pharmaceutics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Progress of Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Stilbenoids

by
Xiancai Li
1,*,
Yongqing Li
2,
Binghong Xiong
1 and
Shengxiang Qiu
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
2
Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2024, 16(5), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050663
Submission received: 5 April 2024 / Revised: 13 May 2024 / Accepted: 14 May 2024 / Published: 15 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Challenges and Future Prospects of Antibacterial Therapy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial drugs have made outstanding contributions to the treatment of pathogenic infections. However, the emergence of drug resistance continues to be a major threat to human health in recent years, and therefore, the search for novel antimicrobial drugs is particularly urgent. With a deeper understanding of microbial habits and drug resistance mechanisms, various creative strategies for the development of novel antibiotics have been proposed. Stilbenoids, characterized by a C6–C2–C6 carbon skeleton, have recently been widely recognized for their flexible antimicrobial roles. Here, we comprehensively summarize the mode of action of stilbenoids from the viewpoint of their direct antimicrobial properties, antibiofilm and antivirulence activities and their role in reversing drug resistance. This review will provide an important reference for the future development and research into the mechanisms of stilbenoids as antimicrobial agents.

1. Introduction

Microorganisms are life forms with the widest distribution, the most abundant species and the largest biomass on earth. Some microorganisms, such as intestinal beneficial microorganisms, industrial microbial strains and agricultural microbial agents, are widely used in the human health industry and agricultural production and have greatly promoted the development of the economy and society. Others, however, cause pathogenic diseases. Bacterial infections were fatal until the 1940s, when penicillin was discovered. In the years that followed, the discovery of antibiotics released people from the hegemony of infection and improved our quality of life and life expectancy. However, with the abuse of antimicrobial drugs, many new challenges in the treatment of pathogenic infections have emerged recently. First of all, new pathogens continue to emerge, such as SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, and there is still a lack of effective drugs against these pathogens. Second, the development of drug resistance makes it difficult to treat previously curable infections. According to statistics, an estimated 4.95 million people died from bacterial AMR in 2019, of which 1.27 million died directly [1]. Third, many existing antimicrobials have defects. For example, the antifungal drugs azole, polyene and echinomycin can cause a variety of side effects in the human body. Therefore, it is urgent to find more efficient and safer antimicrobials.
Stilbenoid, characterized by a C6–C2–C6 carbon skeleton, possess a wide range of pharmacological activities. For example, resveratrol has demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, hypolipidemic, hypoglycemic and anticancer activities [2,3,4]. It can also be used as a supplement to prevent cardiovascular system diseases, nervous system diseases and cancer [5]. In addition, the antimicrobial activity of stilbenoids is also of great concern to phytochemists and pharmacologists. Plant-derived stilbenoids are a class of important phytoalexins produced by plants to protect against pathogen infections and toxins. Mattio et al. summarized the sources, chemical structures and the antibacterial mechanism of natural stilbenoids [6]. The role of stilbenoid-abundant extracts in the mitigation of mycotoxins in food and feedstuffs has also attracted great interest [7]. However, there is no review providing a comprehensive overview of the antimicrobial (antibacterial and antifungal) mechanisms of stilbenoids from the perspective of their direct microbicidal activity, antibiofilm activity and/or regulation of the pathogenicity of microbes. Here, this review will emphasize recent achievements in these aspects of stilbenoids.

2. The Family of Stilbenoids

Resveratrol was the first stilbenoid to be discovered. It was originally isolated from the root of Veratrum grandiflorum in 1939 by Takaoka [8]. Subsequently, with the introduction of more accurate metabolite identification/isolation techniques and chemical synthesis, more and more complex stilbenoids were identified. These stilbenoids can be divided into three categories according to their chemical structure, including monomers and oligomers (Figure 1).
Monomeric stilbenes, such as resveratrol, piceatannol, pterostilbene and pinosylvin, are characterized by two phenyl rings, joined by an ethylene bridge. Oligomeric stilbenes are a group of compounds polymerized from monomeric stilbene. Resveratrol oligomers, which consist of two to eight or more resveratrol subunits, are the largest group of the oligomeric stilbenes [9]. Hopeaphenol, a tetramer of resveratrol isolated from Hopea odorata and Balanocarpus heimti, was the first oligomeric stilbenoid to be discovered in 1951 [10]. Subsequently, more and more oligomeric stilbenes from plants were identified. Oligomers can be polymerized from either homogenous or heterogeneous monomeric stilbenes. For example, hopeaphenol and ε-viniferin are polymerized from resveratrol units, while Gnetuhianin Q is a mixed dimer that is polymerized from both isorhapotigenin and resveratrol. Gnetuhainin K is the mixed dimer of gnetol and isorhapotigenin [11]. Those oligomers can be divided into benzofuran oligomers and benzocyclopentane oligomers.
Bibenzyls (e.g., amorfrutin B and erianin, etc.) are comprised of two aromatic rings linked by an ethyl bridge. Monomeric bibenzyls can be polymerized into bisbibenzyls. However, no oligomers polymerized by more than three bibenzyl units have been found.
Phenanthrenoids include the phenanthrenes, 9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes and their oligomers. More than one hundred dimers have been identified [12]. However, only three triphenanthrenes have been reported [13,14,15].

3. Structural Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity of Stilbenoids

Simple monomeric stilbenes (including resveratrol, piceatannol and pinosylvin) or bibenzyls (including 5-hydroxy-lunularic acid and 3,3′,5-trihydroxybibenzyl), synthesized through the phenylpropanoid pathway, are the precursor of many other stilbenoids in plants. It is generally believed that phenanthrenes and 9,10-dihydrophenanthrenes are formed by the oxidative coupling of the aromatic rings of stilbene and bibenzyl precursors, respectively [16,17]. However, other views on the biosynthesis of phenanthrenoids have been discussed in another review [16]. Subsequently, the diversity of stilbenoids is greatly increased via enzymatic modifications of side groups on the precursors, such as methylation, prenylation, oligomerization, hydroxylation, glycosylation and isomerization. The chemical diversity of stilbenoids provides them with a wide range of antimicrobial activities (Table 1), especially drug-resistant microbes.

3.1. Methylation

Methylation is the most common modification in plants. Methylation alters the chemical properties of hydroxyl stilbenes and therefore affects their antimicrobial activity. For example, rapid absorption and metabolism result in the limited oral bioavailability of resveratrol, which restricts the application of this potentially valuable compound in clinical trials [18,19]. However, pterostilbene, a dimethoxy derivative of resveratrol, shows better bioavailability and stronger antifungal activity [20]. In addition, stilbenes such as pinosylvin, piceatannol and pinostilbene, which contain a varied number of methylated groups, also exhibit higher antimicrobial activity compared to resveratrol [21,22,23,24]. Li et al. shows that the chemical affinity balance of substituent groups of stilbenes is key for their antifungal activity [25].

3.2. Isomerization

Structurally, stilbenes can exist as cis (Z) and trans (E) isomers, based on the configuration of the ethylene bridge, such as trans-resveratrol and cis-resveratrol. Generally, the two isomers exhibit different chemical characteristics and thereby different biological activities. The E-type configuration is more common in nature. This configuration is not sterically hindered, being therefore more stable. For example, research showed that trans-resveratrol exhibited stronger antibacterial effects compared to cis-resveratrol [26].

3.3. Prenylation

Prenyl groups can be attached to the skeleton at different positions and in different configurations (e. g., chain or ring-closed prenylation). One isoprenyl (3,3-dimethylallyl) moiety bound to the aromatic ring of stilbenes is the most common form in nature. In addition, prenyl patterns such as 3-methyl-but-1-enyl and geranyl are also often introduced to various positions of the stilbene backbone, along with oxidation, methylation and cyclization moieties, increasing the structural diversity of stilbenoids. Prenylation of compounds improves the binding affinity to receptors and is beneficial to membrane partitioning, consequently enhancing bioactivity [27]. For example, prenylated stilbenoids generally exhibit stronger antibacterial activity with MICs (minimal inhibitory concentration) in the µg/mL range. Improved properties, such as hydrophobicity, charge or molecular geometry, may contribute to their enhanced activity [28]. However, the rule is not absolute. For example, isopentenylated longistylin C shows lower antifungal activity than pinosylvin monomethyl ether (PME) [25]. This is closely related to their mechanism of action.

3.4. Oligomerization

Oligomeric stilbenoids are formed by oxidative coupling between homogenous or heterogeneous monomeric stilbenoids. A series of oligomeric stilbenoids has been identified in recent years, of which some are superior in bioactivity, stability and selectivity compared to the parental monomers [29,30]. For example, tapinarof is a stilbene drug isolated from the gammaproteobacterial Photorhabdus genus [31]. Duotap-520, isolated from Photorhabdus gammaproteobacteria, is the dimer of tapinarof and exhibits enhanced activity against Gram-positive bacteria (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis), with no resistance development even after daily non-lethal exposure for a duration of three months [31]. Interestingly, this metabolic dimer of tapinarof has gained antibacterial activity but has lost its anti-inflammatory activity [31]. Another dimer is dehydro-δ-viniferin, which shows enhanced antibacterial activity compared to monomer resveratrol [32].
Table 1. Antimicrobial activities and mechanisms of stilbenoids.
Table 1. Antimicrobial activities and mechanisms of stilbenoids.
TargetsCompoundsDetailsDetermination
Methods		Refs
Cell membraneLongistylin AMRSA, MIC = 1.56 µg/mL; disturbing membrane potential and increasing permeability.Micro-well dilution.[33]
ToremifeneP. gingivalis and S. mutans, MICs = 12.5–25 µM; disrupting the cell membrane.Micro-well dilution.[34]
Dehydro-δ-viniferinL. monocytogenes, MIC = 2 μg/mL.Micro-well dilution.[35]
PterostilbeneF. nucleatum, MIC = 20 µg/mL utilizing 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin as a solubilizer.Micro-well dilution.[36]
ResveratrolS. aureus ATCC 25923, MIC = 512 μg/mL; P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, MIC > 512 μg/mL.Micro-well dilution.[32]
Cajaninstilbene acid derivative 5bS. aureus ATCC25923, MIC = 4 μg/mL; S. epidermidis ATCC12228, MIC = 1 μg/mL; B. subtilis ATCC6633, MIC = 0.5 μg/mL; interferring in PG synthesis pathway by targeting PgsA.Micro-well dilution.[37,38]
PMEA. flavus, IC50 = 260 μg/mL; binding the phospholipids of cell membrane.Agar drug plate growth assay.[25]
Cell wallDuotap-520MRSAs, MICs = 4 μM; VRE, MIC = 6 μM; binding to lipid II.Micro-well dilution.[39]
GW458344XInhibiting MurC activity, IC50 = 368 μM; MurD, IC50 = 104 μM; MurE, IC50 = 49 μM; MurF, IC50 = 59 μM.Enzyme activity test.[40]
135CS. aureus, MICs = 0.12–0.5 μg/mL; targeting cell wall teichoic acids.Micro-well dilution.[41]
Plagiochin EInhibiting the activity of chitin synthases.Enzyme activity test.[42]
TamoxifenS. pombe, MIC = 32 μg/mL; inhibiting Ccr1 NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase activitie.Micro-well dilution.[43]
DNAResveratrol-trans-dihydrodimerB. cereus, MIC = 15.0 μM; L. monocytogenes, MIC = 125 μM; S. aureus, MIC = 62.0 μM; E. coli, MIC = 123 μM, upon addition of the efflux pump inhibitor; inhibiting DNA gyrase.Micro-well dilution.[44]
Triazolyl-pterostilbene derivative 4dMRSAs, MICs = 1.2–2.4 μg/mL, MBCs = 19.5–39 μg/mL; inhibiting the activity of DNA polymerase.Micro-well dilution.[45]
OxyresveratrolC. albicans ATCC90028, MIC = 5.0 μg/mL; C. parapsilosis ATCC22019, MIC = 5 μg/mL; inflicting cleavage on DNA.Micro-well dilution.[46]
ResveratrolS. typhimurium, MIC = 5 μg/mL; inducing DNA disruption.Micro-well dilution.[47]
MitochondriaResveratrolC. albicans ATCC 90028, MIC = 20 µM; inducing mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.Micro-well dilution.[48]
Plagiochin EC. albicans CA2, MIC = 16 μg/mL; inducing mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.-[49,50]
ATPaseResveratrol and piceatannolInhibiting ATPase activity; piceatannol, IC50 = 14 μM; resveratrol, IC50 = 94 μM.Enzyme activity test.[51]
Cell-divisionResveratrolE. coli, MIC = 456 μg/mL; preventing Z-ring formation.-[52]
PTS systemCajaninstilbene acidSensitive Enterococcus strains and VRE strains, MICs = 0.5–2 μg/mL; inhibiting carbohydrate specific type II transporters of PTS system.Micro-well dilution; proteomics; q-PCR.[53]
Calmodulin–calcineurin pathwayTamoxifenS. pombe, MIC = 35 μg/mL; Candida spp. and C. neoformans, MICs = 8–64 μg/mL; directly binding to calmodulin.Agar drug plate growth assay; micro-well dilution[54,55,56]
Virulence factorsErianinS. aureus ATCC25904, MIC = 512 μg/mL; inhibiting the activity of SrtA with a IC50 = 20.91 ± 2.31 μg/mL.Micro-well dilution.[57]
ResveratrolReducing the secretion of α-hemolysin by downregulating saeRS.Red blood hemolysis assay.[58,59]
DIDSInhibiting V. vulnificus toxicity to HeLa cells at 10–300 μM with no influence on host cell viability and bacterial growth; reducing the expression of TolCV1.-[60]
RaloxifeneEnhancing the survival percentage of C. elegans infected with P. aeruginosa PA14 at 12.5–100 μg/mL; inhibiting pyocyanin production by binding and inhibiting PhzB2.-[61]
(-)-HopeaphenolReducing cell entry and subsequent intracellular growth of bacteria; inhibiting the expression of YopE with a IC50 = 8.8 μM; inhibiting the activity of YopH with a IC50 = 2.9 μM.A luminescent reporter-gene assay (YopE); an enzyme-based YopH assay.[62,63]
Hopeaphenol, isohopeaphenol, kobophenol A and ampelopsin AReducing the pathogenicity of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 on leaves; reducing the expression of hrpA, hrpL and hopP1 genes without influence on bacterial growth. [64,65]
BiofilmResveratrolInhibiting swarming of P. mirabilis at 15 μg/mL, and completely inhibited swarming at 60 μg/mL.-[66]
S. typhimurium SL1344, MIC > 512 μg/mL; inhibiting adhesion of S. typhimurium to HeLa cells; downregulating the expression of flagella genes.-[67]
P. gingivalis, MICs= 78.12–156.25 μg/mL; reducing the expression fimbriae genes.-[68]
V. cholerae, MIC = 60 μg/mL; antibiofilm at 10–30 μg/mL; inhibiting the activity of AphB.Crystal violet assay; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[69]
S. mutans, MIC = 800 μg/mL; inhibiting biofilm formation at 50–400 μg/mL; reducing the biosynthesis of polysaccharide.Growth curve assay; crystal violet assay; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[70,71]
Inhibiting pyocyanin production of P. aeruginosa PAO1 by directly binding LasR.-[72]
Reducing MN production.-[73]
Resveratrol and oxyresveratrolAntibiofilm at 10 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL; reducing fimbriae production and the swarming motility of UPEC.Crystal violet assay; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[74]
Trans-stilbeneReducing biofilm of S. aureus ATCC6538 at 50–200 μg/mL; decreasing the expression of intercellular adhesion locus.Crystal violet assay; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[58]
PiceatannolS. mutans, MIC50 = 564 ± 38 μM; antibiofilm, IC50 = 52 ± 6 μM; inhibiting the activity of GtfB and GtfC.Crystal violet assay; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[75]
OxyresveratrolS. mutans, MIC = 500 μg/mL; reducing biofilm formation at 62.5–250 μg/mL; suppressing the expression of gtfB and gtfC.Micro-well dilution; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[76]
Amorfrutin BAntibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa PAO1 with a biofilm inhibition ratio of 50.3 ± 2.7 at 50 μM; binding the receptors of signal molecule.Crystal violet assay.[77]
Cajaninstilbene acid analogue 3oInhibiting biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa with inhibition ratio of 49.50 ± 1.35% at 50 μM; suppressing the expression of lasB and pqsA.Crystal violet assay.[78]
Riccardin DInhibiting biofilm formation at 16 µg/mL and 64 µg/mL using central venous catheter (CVC)-associated C. albicans biofilms in an infectious rabbit model; reducing the expression of hypha-specific genes.XTT reduction assay; scanning electron microscopy; confocal laser scanning microscopy.[79,80]
PterostilbeneInhibiting the formation of C. albicans biofilms in vitro at 1–32 μg/mL; downregulating the expression of filamentation-related genes.XTT reduction assays; confocal laser scanning microscopy; scanning electron microscopy.[81]
Reversing antibiotic resistanceResveratrolEnhancing the efficacy of aminoglycosides against Gram-positive pathogens; inhibiting the activity of ATP synthase.-[82]
Increasing susceptibility of P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm to aminoglycosides; inhibiting the expression of signaling molecule synthase genes lasI and rhlI.-[83,84]
PterostilbeneRestoring the effectiveness of meropenem against NDM-expressing strains; inhibiting NDM-1 hydrolysis activity at 4–32 μg/mL.-[85]
Cajaninstilbene acidRestoring the susceptibility of polymyxin B to mcr-1 positive Gram-negative bacteria; inhibiting the enzymatic activity of MCR-1.-[86]
Resveratrol, pterostilbene, and pinosylvinIncreasing sensitivity of A. butzleri strains to chloramphenicol, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin by acting as EPIs.-[87,88,89]
PiceatannolIncreasing sensitivity of S. aureus to ciprofloxacin by decreasing PMF.-[90]

4. Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Stilbenoids

Stilbenoids exert antimicrobial activities via various modes (Figure 2). The antimicrobial mechanisms mainly include (I) acting on conventional targets, (II) acting on nonconventional targets and (III) reversing antibiotic resistance. Firstly, stilbenoids can inhibit conventional targets, such as the cell membrane, cell wall, DNA, the calmodulin–calcineurin pathway, mitochondria, cell division and the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent phosphotransferase system. Secondly, stilbenoids can function as antibiofilm or antivirulence agents. Stilbenoids inhibit biofilm formation and assist in the eradication of preformed biofilms. Moreover, stilbenoids can reverse drug resistance by inhibiting alternative targets, target-modifying enzymes or antibiotic-modifying enzymes.

4.1. Direct Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Stilbenoids

4.1.1. Targeting the Cell Membrane

The antimicrobial mechanism elucidates the membrane-disruption effects of stilbenoids, resulting in the leakage of cell contents and subsequent cell death. For example, the anti-MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) activity of longistylin A, a stilbene isolated from the leaves of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp, is mediated by disturbing the bacterial membrane potential and increasing permeability [33]. Li et al. showed that PME exerted anti-Aspergillus flavus activity by binding the phospholipids, leading to decreased fluidity and increased permeability of the cell membrane [25]. In addition, toremifene (an FDA-approved anticancer agent synthesized in 1981), pterostilbene, dehydro-δ-viniferin (a stilbene dimer chemically semi-synthesized from resveratrol), resveratrol and so on, are all shown to exert antimicrobial activity by disrupting the cell membrane [32,34,36].
Membrane-associated protein PgsA catalyzes glycerolphosphate to replace cytidine monophosphate to produce phosphatidylglycerol phosphate (PG-P). Subsequently, PG-P is dephosphorylated by PgpP to yield phosphatidylglycerol (PG), a major component of cell membrane [91]. Research has shown that a chemically synthesized cajaninstilbene acid-derivative, 5b, interferes in the PG synthesis pathway by targeting PgsA [37].

4.1.2. Targeting the Cell Wall

The bacterial cell wall is a peptidoglycan polymer network that is composed of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc), with a pentapeptide attached. Firstly, the UDP-MurNAc-pentapeptide is coupled with bactoprenyl-phosphate (lipid I) on the cytosolic side of the cell membrane, followed by the coupling of the GlcNAc sugar by the enzyme MurG to produce lipid II. Next, lipid II, containing the complete peptidoglycan subunit, is translocated to the outside of the cell membrane. The subunits are inserted into the cell wall by penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) to make the cell wall grow further. Finally, the lipid anchor is returned to the cell for the next round of synthesis [92]. Duotap-520, a natural stilbene dimer isolated from Photorhabdus, can bind to lipid II, preventing the role of lipid II [39]. Bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis is catalyzed by a series of Mur ligases in the intracellular steps. Research has shown that chemically synthesized aza-stilbene GW458344X is a competitive inhibitor of MurD, an enzyme catalyzing the reaction from UDP-MurNAc-Ala to UDP-MurNAc-dipeptide [40]. Wall teichoic acids (WTAs) are anionic glycopolymers anchored in the cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria and have critical functions in bacterial physiology. The first-committed step of WAT biosynthesis is catalyzed by TagA, a membrane-associated glycosyltransferase [93]. The two-component transporter TagGH is responsible for the exportation of WATs [94]. A mutation in genes (tagH, tagA and tagG) has conferred drug resistance to S. aureus against the chemically synthesized tris-stilbene 135C. Therefore, 135C showed promising activity against Gram-positive bacteria, probably via targeting cell wall teichoic acids [41].
The fungal cell wall, a complex matrix with no mammalian counterpart, plays a role in maintaining cell shape and integrity, and therefore presents an ideal drug target. The cell wall consists of complex components, mainly polysaccharides (glucans, mannans and chitins), proteins and lipids. Studies showed that the macrocyclic bis(bibenzyl) plagiochin E caused damage in cell wall of C. albicans by inhibiting chitin synthetase activities [42]. The NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase Ccr1 plays a role in the cell wall assembly of budding yeast [95]. The deletion of Ccr1 could cause defects in yeast cell wall integrity. Tamoxifen, an estrogen receptor antagonist used for treating breast cancer, has been found to inhibit Ccr1 NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase activities of fission yeast and C. albicans in a dose-dependent manner, thereby causing defects in cell wall integrity [43].

4.1.3. Targeting the DNA

Stilbenoids can inhibit the synthesis of DNA. For example, resveratrol-trans-dihydrodimer, obtained by the oligomerization of resveratrol catalyzed by soybean peroxidase in vitro, has been shown to inhibit DNA synthesis by reducing DNA gyrase activity via blocking the ATP-binding site of the enzyme [44]. Another study demonstrated that the chemically synthesized triazolyl-pterostilbene derivatives (4d, 7d and 7e) exhibited potent anti-MRSA activity by inhibiting the activity of DNA polymerase [45]. Stilbenoids can also damage DNA. For example, oxyresveratrol inflicted cleavage on DNA by directly binding to the DNA, which in turn led to mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in C. albicans [46]. Resveratrol induces DNA disruption via pro-oxidant activity (including increasing ROS and malondialdehyde accumulation and depleting glutathione) against Salmonella typhimurium [47].

4.1.4. Targeting the Mitochondria

Mitochondria not only power life via their varied metabolic functions, but also play a central role in apoptotic cell death. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization upon stimulation usually causes cytochrome c release from the mitochondria and subsequent metacaspase activation, and eventually commits a cell to die [96]. As such, targeting mitochondrial membrane to manipulate cell death holds tremendous antimicrobial potential. Studies have demonstrated that resveratrol caused the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), leading to metacaspase activation, cytochrome c release and eventually apoptosis of C. albicans [48]. Another study showed that plagiochin E could induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in yeast, mainly including the activation of F(0)F(1)-ATPase, inhibition of dehydrogenase and release of cytochrome c, leading to metacaspase activation [49,50].

4.1.5. Actions on other Conventional Targets

The cell membrane and wall, the DNA and mitochondria mentioned above are all conventional antimicrobial targets. In addition, stilbenoids can also act on other conventional targets. For example, resveratrol and piceatannol inhibited both the ATPase activity and ATP synthesis of Escherichia coli reversibly [51]. Resveratrol can also exert antibacterial activity by downregulating FtsZ expression and preventing Z-ring formation. FtsZ can polymerize to form a dynamic ring (Z-ring) to promote cell division in prokaryotes. The Z-ring plays a role in recruiting division-related proteins and directing septal peptidoglycan synthesis to initiate division [52,97].
The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) consists of the coupled carbohydrate-specific transporters (called “EIIs”) and two general components, EI and HPr, encoded by ptsI and ptsH, respectively [98]. The PTS catalyzes the coupled phosphorylation of carbohydrates and their transport into cells. Firstly, the phosphoryl groups derived from PEP are transferred from the EI to an EII with the mediation of HPr. Finally, the phosphoryl groups are transferred to a carbohydrate substrate by its cognate EII [53]. Given that this system plays an important role in catalytic transport and has extensive regulatory functions, it presents an important drug target for the development of antibacterial agents [99]. Cajaninstilbene acid has been shown to inhibit vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus by inhibiting the carbohydrate-specific type II transporters of the PTS system, as confirmed by proteomics and fluorescence quantitative PCR [53].
Tamoxifen is a known inhibitor of mammalian calmodulin. Recent studies have found that tamoxifen could exert antifungal activity through targeting the calmodulin–calcineurin pathway. Evidence suggests that tamoxifen could induce a consistent phenotype in C. albicans, resembling yeasts that have lost the calmodulin function (e. g., disrupting cell integrity, blocking new bud emergence, interfering with the polarization of the actin cytoskeleton and inhibiting germ tube formation). Moreover, the increased expression of calmodulin inhibited the antifungal activity of tamoxifen. The strains with mutations in calmodulin are hypersensitive to tamoxifen [54,55]. MYO2 is a calmodulin-binding protein involved in various cellular polarized growth processes [100]. Studies demonstrated that tamoxifen can interfere with the interaction between Myo2p and calmodulin in yeast [55]. Another study also showed that toremifene and tamoxifen exert the anti-cryptococcal activity by directly binding to calmodulin, leading to suppressed calmodulin-mediated calcineurin activation and nuclear localization of the transcription factor Crz1/SP-1 [56,101].

4.2. Stilbenoids Targeting Virulence Factors

With the continuous emergence of multidrug-resistant microbes, conventional antibiotics are becoming increasingly ineffective at treating microbial infections. Virulence determines the pathogenicity of pathogens. Pathogens achieve host colonization, tissue damage and immune evasion/modulation with the help of virulence factors. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in disrupting the microbial virulence mechanisms that disarm pathogenic microbes rather than killing them using anti-infective/anti-virulence drugs. Anti-virulence agents aim to inhibit the virulence factors (adhesins, invasins, enzymes and toxins) or other surface proteins that allow the pathogens to survive in adverse conditions, which, in turn, slows the infection rate [102]. It has been greatly encouraged to research and develop agents for clinical use that specifically target the production of virulence factors, without inhibiting planktonic cell growth, to control infection in the resistance era. Firstly, an anti-virulence treatment strategy places less selective pressure on microbes to evolve novel antibiotic resistance mechanisms [103]. Secondly, anti-virulence agents can, in theory, distinguish between the endogenous microbiome and infectious pathogens, which is something that conventional antibiotics do not have.
Surface proteins can assist the bacteria to adhere to the surface of host organ tissues and evade the host’s immune defense with the assistance of transpeptidase [104,105]. For example, the deletion of sortase A (SrtA), an important transpeptidase in S. aureus, could downregulate the level of surface proteins and thereby relieve infection symptoms of S. aureus in mouse models, without any influence on the bacterial growth [106]. Erianin, a bibenzyl isolated from Dendrobium chrysotoxum [107], could inhibit the activity of SrtA at subminimum inhibitory concentrations by binding to SrtA, leading to the reduced adhesion of S. aureus to fibrinogen without influencing bacterial growth and thereby improving survival in mice infected with S. aureus [57].
The toxins have been implicated in the pathogenesis, such as hemolysins, leukocidins, superantigens and surface proteins. For example, α-hemolysin (Hla) is secreted by S. aureus and can lyse erythrocyte by directly binding to the cell membrane, forming perforations. Studies have shown that resveratrol and trans-stilbene can markedly inhibit the hemolysis of S. aureus at subinhibitory concentrations by repressing the expression of the hla gene, thereby attenuating S. aureus virulence in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans [58]. The two-component system SaeRS plays a crucial role in the production of virulence factors [108]. Studies showed that resveratrol could reduce the secretion of α-hemolysin by downregulating saeRS [59]. Moreover, the toxin RtxA1 of Vibrio vulnificus can cause membrane permeabilization upon host contact. It has been shown that although 4,4′-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid disodium salt hydrate (DIDS) could not exert antibacterial activity against V. vulnificus, it significantly inhibited the secretion of RtxA1 by reducing the expression of TolCV1 [60]. The outer membrane portal TolC (designated TolCV1 and TolCV2 in V. vulnificus), coupled with tripartite efflux pumps, is crucial for the export of RtxA1 [109].
Pyocyanin, produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, can assist bacteria in escaping the host’s immune system and successfully establishing infection by preventing T-cells from effectively responding against P. aeruginosa and by inhibiting the activity of monocytes and macrophages, thus reducing the production of cytokines [110]. Therefore, pyocyanin biosynthesis is an important target for novel antimicrobial drug discovery. Pyocyanin synthesis is catalyzed by a series of enzymes encoded by the homologous phzA1B1C1D1E1F1G1 and phzA2B2C2D2E2F2G2 operons. The estrogen receptor modulator, raloxifene, was found to inhibit pyocyanin production by binding and inhibiting PhzB2, and thereby attenuating P. aeruginosa virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans model [61].
The type III secretion system (T3SS) is a complex “molecular syringe” consisting of a base embedded within the bacterial membrane, a needle filament that connects the bacteria to the host cell, a tip that functions as a platform for the assembly of the translocon, and a transposon that spans the host cell membrane [111]. The T3SS functions to inject effectors of bacteria into host cells, leading to damaged cell structure and compromised immune response and eventually assisting in bacterial infection. The T3SS is an attractive drug target for developing novel antibacterial agents, since it is crucial in virulence and evolutionarily conserved in Gram-negative pathogens. In addition, the endogenous gut microflora lacks the T3SS and therefore is not likely to be affected by anti-T3SS agents. (−)-Hopeaphenol, a natural tetramer of resveratrol, was found to reduce cell entry and subsequent intracellular growth of bacteria by inhibiting the translocation of effector protein YopE from Y. pseudotuberculosis and ExoS from P. aeruginosa into HeLa cells. (−)-Hopeaphenol could inhibit the expression and secretion of the translocator protein YopD of T3SS [62,63]. The type III secretion system (also called the Hrp secretion system) is encoded by hrp (which stands for hypersensitive reaction and pathogenicity) genes in plant pathogenic bacteria. HrpL can activate hrp and avr gene expression by recognizing consensus motifs in the promotors of these genes [112]. HrpA encodes components of the type III secretion system [113]. Research showed that resveratrol-derived oligomers (hopeaphenol, isohopeaphenol, kobophenol A and ampelopsin A), isolated from grapevine roots, could reduce the pathogenicity of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 on tomato leaves by reducing the expression of hrpA, hrpL and hopP1 genes without influencing bacterial growth [64,65].

4.3. Stilbenoids Targeting Biofilms

It is estimated that 40–80% of bacteria and archaea on earth reside in biofilms [114]. A biofilm is a macrocolony of microorganisms that are attached to a surface, and a key factor that cause chronic infections (e.g., cystic fibrosis, dental plaque, chronic wounds, urinary infection, prosthetic joint infection, chronic otitis media, middle ear cholesteatoma, chronic adenoiditis, chronic prostatitis and cardiac valve infection) [115,116]. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), more than 80% of human microbial infections are related to biofilms [117]. Biofilms offer microorganisms strong competitive advantages under various environmental challenges [118]. For example, it has been estimated that bacteria in biofilms are 10,000 times more resistant to antibiotics than plankton bacteria [119,120]. Several reasons could account for the antibiotic tolerance of biofilms. Firstly, it is difficult for antibiotics to invade into the deeper layers of biofilm due to the protection of the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix [121]. In addition, the biofilm increases the transfer rate of horizontal genes, which are responsible for antibiotic resistance [122]. Moreover, the microbes in biofilm have a relatively low rate of cell growth and reproduction. Reduced metabolic activity will lead to decreased antibiotic effectiveness [123]. Moreover, biofilms can also colonize medical devices (for example, catheters and implants). Thus, biofilm is an attractive target for the development of new antibiotics to treat aggressive pathogenic infections.
Biofilm formation can be described in five progressive stages: initial reversible attachment; irreversible attachment; the first layer formation; formation of mushroom- or tower-like structures; and dispersion and reattachment [115]. Diverse studies have shown that stilbenoids can target the major events in the formation processes to prevent biofilm formation and induce mature biofilm clearance.

4.3.1. Prevention of Initial Attachment

It is essential to move close enough to a physical surface for the formation of microbial biofilms. Studies have shown that flagella and fimbriae are crucial for bacterial attachment to surfaces. Stilbenoids can inhibit microbial attachment by reducing these factors. For example, flagella-mediated motility is essential for overcoming the electrostatic repulsion of microbial cells and surfaces, while fimbriae-mediated twitching motility assists bacterial cells to aggregate to form microcolonies [124,125,126]. Resveratrol inhibited flagellin production and the swarming of Proteus mirabilis, thereby inhibiting their ability to invade human urothelial cells [66]. Another study showed that resveratrol downregulated the expression of flagella genes, leading to reduced swimming motility and, therefore, compromised adhesion of Salmonella typhimurium to HeLa cells [67].
Fimbriae, encoded by the fimA gene, can be classified into six genotypes (type I, Ib, II, III, IV and V). Studies have found that resveratrol could suppress the expression of fimA and xadA (which encode an afimbrial adhesion), thereby reducing cell surface adhesion of the Gram-negative bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, which can cause Pierce’s disease in grapevines [127]. Resveratrol dose-dependently prevented the biofilm formation of P. gingivalis by reducing the expression of genes which encode fimbriae (type II and IV) [68]. Resveratrol and oxyresveratrol reduced fimbriae production and the swarming motility of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), leading to reduced biofilm formation and hemagglutinating ability, reducing the defense of UPEC against human whole blood [74]. In addition, type IV toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP) is an important attachment factor [128]. AphB controls the expression of TcpP. TcpP activates TCP by controlling the expression of ToxT, a direct activator of TCP [129]. Resveratrol can suppress biofilm formation of V. cholerae by inhibiting the activity of AphB [69].
The slime substance polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) is critical for adhesion on hydrophilic surfaces. It can be synthesized by products of the intercellular adhesion (ica) locus [130]. Studies showed that trans-stilbene could reduce the biofilm by decreasing the expression of the intercellular adhesion locus (icaA and icaD) in S. aureus [58].

4.3.2. Targeting Biofilm Maturation

After initial attachment and aggregation, the pathogens will further become embedded and secured in the matrix. This process is called biofilm maturation. Biofilm maturation includes cell–cell interaction, hyphal differentiation (fungi) and extracellular matrix production [131]. The development of the microcolony into a mature biofilm is regulated by various regulatory systems, such as the quorum-sensing (QS) system, the two-component regulatory systems and the type III secretion system [132]. Stilbenoids can target extracellular polymeric substance (EPS), signaling regulatory systems, as well as other surface properties of pathogens that are required for the development of the biofilm.
Microbes in biofilms are wrapped in a self-produced EPS matrix. The components of the EPS mainly include extracellular DNA, lipids, polysaccharides and proteins [133]. Among them, polysaccharides can provide a number of benefits to the cells in the biofilm, such as assisting in intercellular adhesion and protection and providing structural support [134]. Studies found that resveratrol could inhibit the biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans by reducing the biosynthesis of polysaccharides [70,71]. Water-insoluble glucans form the structural scaffold of biofilms. Extracellular glucosyltransferases GtfB and GtfC are involved in the biosynthesis of water-insoluble glucans. Studies showed that piceatannol could inhibit the activity of GtfB and GtfC, leading to the compromised biofilm formation of S. mutans in a dose-dependent manner, both in vitro and in vivo [75]. Another study showed that oxyresveratrol reduced S. mutans biofilm formation by suppressing the expression of gtfB and gtfC [76,135].
Acetic acid, as a signaling molecule, can stimulate bacterial biofilm formation [136]. Streptococcus mutans is a major inducer of dental caries. An effective way to treat this disease is to replace S. mutans by Lactobacillus casei within the dental plaque. Studies have found that oxyresveratrol could promote L. casei to produce acetic acid, which inhibited the biofilm formation of S. mutans and therefore facilitated L. casei to compete with S. mutans [76,135].
Quorum sensing (QS) is a kind of communication between microbial cells. Bacteria can secrete signaling molecules into their surroundings. Signaling molecules can be imported into cells after the bacterial population density reaches a certain threshold, directly binding to the receptor LasR to regulate biofilm formation or the production of virulence factors [83,137]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa has four QS systems: las, rhl, pqs and iqs. pqs QS regulates the biosynthesis of pyocyanin [138]. Pyocyanin can facilitate extracellular electron transfer in P. aeruginosa biofilms, therefore supporting the growth of biofilms [139,140]. Research has found that amorfrutin B, a bibenzyl isolated from Amorpha fruticose [141], can reduce the pyocyanin production and biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa by competitively binding the receptors of the signal molecules ODdHL and PQS, thereby inhibiting the expression of downstream genes such as lasB, rhlA and pqsA [77]. Cajaninstilbene acid analogue 3o also inhibited the QS systems by suppressing the expression of lasB and pqsA, leading to the inhibition of biofilm formation [78]. Moreover, resveratrol could inhibit the biofilm formation and pyocyanin production of P. aeruginosa PAO1 by directly binding LasR [72].
Hyphal differentiation is required for robust biofilm formation. Research showed that although mutants of hyphal formation can develop into biofilm, these biofilms are loose, rather than stable, compared with wild-type biofilms [131]. The Ras/cAMP/Efg1 pathway plays a key role in fungal morphological transitions by regulating the expression of hyphae-specific genes, such as HGC1 (functioning in the polarized growth of hyphae), ALS3 (encoding a cell wall surface protein related to adhesion), HWP1 (encoding a cell wall mannose protein, which is essential for the normal growth of the mycelium) and ECE1 (encoding a membrane protein, which is related to the extension of hyphal). Efg1 is a transcription factor, regulating the expression of hyphae-specific genes [142]. Stilbenoids can target the morphological transition of C. albicans, thereby inhibiting biofilm formation. For example, the macrocyclic bisbibenzyl riccardin D has been reported to inhibit the biofilm formation of C. albicans both in vitro and in vivo by reducing the expression of hypha-specific genes (ALS1, ALS3, ECE1, EFG1, HWP1 and CDC35) and therefore hypha formation [79,80]. Another study showed that pterostilbene could inhibit biofilm formation and destroy mature biofilms both in vitro and in vivo. Pterostilbene could downregulate the expression of filamentation-related genes in the Ras/cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathway, including ECE1, ALS3, HWP1, HGC1 and RAS1. The addition of exogenous cAMP reverted the defect in pterostilbene-induced filamentous growth [81].

4.3.3. Disarming Pathogens within the Biofilm

It is clear that biofilms continuously release planktonic cells or small clusters of pathogens by dispersal, seeding new sites of infection and ensuring further replication of biofilms [143]. Stilbenoids can interfere with this process by targeting the enzymes involved in it, thereby eradicating the preformed biofilms. For example, S. aureus could escape neutrophil extracellular traps by cleaving their DNA-backbone through secreting micrococcal nuclease (MN). MN also inhibits biofilm development and adhesion by cleaving the extracellular DNA. Reports have shown that resveratrol could reduce MN production, which assists the host immune system to clear the biofilm of S. aureus in clinical situations [73].

4.4. Reversing Antibiotic Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health problem. Microbes use various mechanisms to resist the action of antimicrobials [144]. Some are intrinsic mechanisms, by which bacteria can use genes they already possess to avoid antibiotic exposure, and some are acquired mechanisms, by which bacteria evolve new genetic materials under antibiotic exposure in order to survive. Inhibiting resistance mechanisms is a potential approach to combat drug resistance.
Studies have shown that ATP synthase is an intrinsic resistance factor of bacteria. For example, the inactivation of genes encoding the subunits of ATP synthase could significantly increase the efficacy of gentamicin against S. aureus [145]. Another study showed that the deletion of the ATP synthase subunit atpG increased the efficacy of aminoglycosides against E. coli [146]. Resveratrol could enhance the efficacy of aminoglycosides against various Gram-positive pathogens. Mechanism research has revealed that resveratrol could inhibit the activity of ATP synthase [82].
Biofilm reduces antibiotic permeability due to the protection of the EPS matrix. For example, the minimum biofilm eradication concentrations of clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were 44, 407 and 364 times higher than the minimum bactericidal concentrations for colistin, ciprofloxacin and imipenem, respectively [147]. Considering the roles of biofilm in antimicrobial resistance, inhibiting the formation of biofilm theoretically enhances the effect of antibiotics. P. aeruginosa infection is a serious disease in patients with cystic fibrosis and is difficult to treat due to the persistence of biofilms. A study has shown that the biofilms of P. aeruginosa PAO1 were more susceptible to aminoglycosides in the presence of resveratrol. Mechanism research has revealed that resveratrol could function as a QS inhibitor. QS deficiency leads to thin and less developed biofilms [83]. Resveratrol could inhibit the expression of the signaling molecule synthase genes lasI and rhlI in P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms [84].
Antimicrobial resistance can be conferred by drug-modifying enzymes. The enzymatic degradation of antibiotics involves the hydrolysis of their functional groups, thereby rendering them ineffective. For example, the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) can hydrolyze almost all β-lactam antibiotics. Liu et al. discovered that pterostilbene could significantly inhibit the NDM-1 hydrolysis activity by binding to the catalytic pocket of NDM-1, thereby preventing the substrate from binding to this protein, effectively restoring the effectiveness of meropenem against NDM-expressing strains and protecting mice from pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae [85].
Bacteria can prevent antibiotics from reaching to corresponding target by enzymatic modification of the target protein. For example, polymyxin disrupts membrane integrity by binding to the lipid A moiety of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), ultimately causing cell death. Polymyxin is the last line of defense against Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the plasmid-borne mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1 (encoding phosphoethanolamine transferase) significantly decreases the efficiency of polymyxin against Gram-negative bacteria. mcr-1 is widely spread throughout the world and significantly threatens the usefulness of polymyxin. It can append phosphoethanolamine to a phosphate on lipid A, reducing the electrostatic interaction between LPS and polymyxin, thereby increasing bacteria resistance to polymyxin [148]. Recent studies have demonstrated that Cajaninstilbene acid from Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp can significantly restore the susceptibility of polymyxin B to mcr-1 positive Gram-negative bacteria through inhibiting the enzymatic activity of MCR-1 via binding the active center [86].
Active efflux is mediated by the upregulation of efflux pumps that extrude antibiotics from bacteria to reduce drug concentrations in the cell to non-cytotoxic levels. Recently, efflux pump inhibitors (EPIs) that can reverse antibiotic resistance have received great attention. The AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump, consisting of the inner membrane protein AcrB and the outer membrane protein TolC, linked by AcrA, can transport various toxic compounds out of bacteria, contributing to drug resistance [149,150]. Research has shown that resveratrol could significantly inhibit tolC-promoter activity and decrease tolC expression [87]. Moreover, stilbenes (resveratrol, pterostilbene and pinosylvin) enhance the susceptibility of A. butzleri strains to chloramphenicol, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin by acting as EPIs [88,89]. Proton motive force (PMF) is essential for efflux pumps to export drugs [151]. Piceatannol could decrease PMF of S. aureus, particularly the Δψ component, leading to increased sensitivity of bacteria to ciprofloxacin [90].

5. Conclusions

The heavy use of antibiotics to treat pathogenic infections in humans and animals, as well as in agriculture has promoted the development of drug resistance in microbial populations. Presently, we are entering an era of ever-increasing resistance, in which the treatment of pathogen infection through the use of some conventional antibiotics can no longer be taken for granted, and the need for new antibiotics has never been more urgent [152]. The development of effective therapies against resistant microorganisms and emerging pathogenic microorganisms is a public health priority. The chemical structure of stilbenoids is new in the field of antimicrobial drugs and has received great attention. Stilbenoids demonstrate a diverse range of functions, including direct microbicidal activity, a wide range of effects on biofilms, virulence factors and the reversal of drug resistance, highlighting the considerable possibility of developing stilbenoids as a potential antimicrobial agent. Drug repurposing has emerged as a novel paradigm to find antimicrobial agents. Several stilbenoids with antimicrobial activities have been approved for clinical use, such as toremifene, raloxifene and resveratrol, which are easier to obtain approval for in the treatment of pathogenic infections. However, the practical application of stilbenoids needs to consider challenges such as toxicity, solubility, stability or other factors in advance. Some of these problems could be addressed by chemical modification or by developing delivery devices such as nanocapsules, liposomes and nano-carrier systems [153]. We expect major breakthroughs and revolutionary technologies in the research on stilbenoids. This will serve as a new driving force for improving people’s health.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; writing—review and editing, X.L., Y.L. and B.X.; financial supporting, X.L. and S.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic and Applied Basic Research Youth Fund Project of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2022A1515110442), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (Grant No. 2023A04J0716), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82073733).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Meng, T.; Xiao, D.; Muhammed, A.; Deng, J.; Chen, L.; He, J. Anti-Inflammatory Action and Mechanisms of Resveratrol. Molecules 2021, 26, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Szkudelski, T.; Szkudelska, K. Resveratrol and diabetes: From animal to human studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Basis Dis. 2015, 1852, 1145–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Szczepańska, P.; Rychlicka, M.; Groborz, S.; Kruszyńska, A.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Rapak, A.; Gliszczyńska, A.; Lazar, Z. Studies on the Anticancer and Antioxidant Activities of Resveratrol and Long-Chain Fatty Acid Esters. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bonnefont-Rousselot, D. Resveratrol and Cardiovascular Diseases. Nutrients 2016, 8, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mattio, L.M.; Catinella, G.; Dallavalle, S.; Pinto, A. Stilbenoids: A Natural Arsenal against Bacterial Pathogens. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tran, T.M.; Atanasova, V.; Tardif, C.; Richard-Forget, F. Stilbenoids as Promising Natural Product-Based Solutions in a Race against Mycotoxigenic Fungi: A Comprehensive Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 5075–5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Takaoka, M. Resveratrol, a new phenolic compound, from Veratrum grandiflorum. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1939, 60, 1090–1100. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xue, Y.Q.; Di, J.M.; Luo, Y.; Cheng, K.J.; Wei, X.; Shi, Z. Resveratrol oligomers for the prevention and treatment of cancers. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2014, 2014, 765832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lin, M.; Yao, C.-S. Natural Oligostilbenes. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Attaur, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 33, pp. 601–644. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, Y.H.; Huang, K.S.; Lin, M. Four new stilbene dimers from the lianas of Gnetum hainanense. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2001, 3, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Natale, A.; Pollio, A.; De Marco, A.; Luongo, G.; Di Fabio, G.; Zarrelli, A. Phenanthrene Dimers: Promising Source of Biologically Active Molecules. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 939–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, D.L.; Pan, Y.C.; Li, L.; ShangGuan, Y.N.; Zhang, S.B.; Liu, G.Y.; Cheng, L.; Xiao, S.J. Chemical constituents of Bletilla striata. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 21, 1184–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shi, J.; He, L. Mono-, Bi-, and triphenanthrenes from the tubers of Cremastra appendiculata. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, M.; Cai, L.; Tai, Z.; Zeng, X.; Ding, Z. Four new phenanthrenes from Monomeria barbata Lindl. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 992–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tóth, B.; Hohmann, J.; Vasas, A. Phenanthrenes: A Promising Group of Plant Secondary Metabolites. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 661–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Preisig-Müller, R.; Gnau, P.; Kindl, H. The inducible 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene pathway: Characterization and expression of bibenzyl synthase and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1995, 317, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wenzel, E.; Somoza, V. Metabolism and bioavailability of trans-resveratrol. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2005, 49, 472–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gambini, J.; Inglés, M.; Olaso, G.; Lopez-Grueso, R.; Bonet-Costa, V.; Gimeno-Mallench, L.; Mas-Bargues, C.; Abdelaziz, K.M.; Gomez-Cabrera, M.C.; Vina, J.; et al. Properties of Resveratrol: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies about Metabolism, Bioavailability, and Biological Effects in Animal Models and Humans. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 837042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jeandet, P.; Douillet-Breuil, A.C.; Bessis, R.; Debord, S.; Sbaghi, M.; Adrian, M. Phytoalexins from the Vitaceae: Biosynthesis, phytoalexin gene expression in transgenic plants, antifungal activity, and metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2731–2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.K.; Lee, H.j.; Min, H.y.; Park, E.j.; Lee, K.m.; Ahn, Y.h.; Cho, Y.j.; Pyee, J.H. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of pinosylvin, a constituent of pine. Fitoterapia 2005, 76, 258–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zakova, T.; Rondevaldova, J.; Bernardos, A.; Landa, P.; Kokoska, L. The relationship between structure and in vitro antistaphylococcal effect of plant-derived stilbenes. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2018, 65, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pastorkova, E.; Zakova, T.; Landa, P.; Novakova, J.; Vadlejch, J.; Kokoska, L. Growth inhibitory effect of grape phenolics against wine spoilage yeasts and acetic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 161, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, S.C.; Tseng, C.H.; Wang, P.W.; Lu, P.L.; Weng, Y.H.; Yen, F.L.; Fang, J.Y. Pterostilbene, a Methoxylated Resveratrol Derivative, Efficiently Eradicates Planktonic, Biofilm, and Intracellular MRSA by Topical Application. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Yao, L.; Xiong, B.; Wu, Y.; Chen, S.; Xu, Z.; Qiu, S.X. Inhibitory Mechanism of Pinosylvin Monomethyl Ether against Aspergillus flavus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 15840–15847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kukrić, Z.; Topalic-Trivunovic, N.L. Antibacterial activity of cis- and trans-resveratrol isolated from Polygonum cuspidatum rhizome. Acta Period. Technol. 2006, 37, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brents, L.K.; Medina-Bolivar, F.; Seely, K.A.; Nair, V.; Bratton, S.M.; Ñopo-Olazabal, L.; Patel, R.Y.; Liu, H.; Doerksen, R.J.; Prather, P.L.; et al. Natural prenylated resveratrol analogs arachidin-1 and -3 demonstrate improved glucuronidation profiles and have affinity for cannabinoid receptors. Xenobiotica 2012, 42, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Araya-Cloutier, C.; den Besten, H.M.; Aisyah, S.; Gruppen, H.; Vincken, J.P. The position of prenylation of isoflavonoids and stilbenoids from legumes (Fabaceae) modulates the antimicrobial activity against Gram positive pathogens. Food Chem. 2017, 226, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, S.W.; Chen, S.H.; Guo, H.; Chen, L.T.; Shen, H.J.; Liu, L.; Gao, Z.Z. Elucidation of the Complete Biosynthetic Pathway of Phomoxanthone A and Identification of a Para-Para Selective Phenol Coupling Dimerase. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 3069–3074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gabaston, J.; Cantos-Villar, E.; Biais, B.; Waffo-Teguo, P.; Renouf, E.; Corio-Costet, M.F.; Richard, T.; Mérillon, J. Stilbenes from Vitis vinifera L. Waste: A Sustainable Tool for Controlling Plasmopara viticola. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2711–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Park, H.B.; Goddard, T.N.; Oh, J.; Patel, J.; Wei, Z.; Perez, C.E.; Mercado, B.Q.; Wang, R.; Wyche, T.P.; Piizzi, G.; et al. Bacterial Autoimmune Drug Metabolism Transforms an Immunomodulator into Structurally and Functionally Divergent Antibiotics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 7871–7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mattio, L.M.; Dallavalle, S.; Musso, L.; Filardi, R.; Franzetti, L.; Pellegrino, L.; D’Incecco, P.; Mora, D.; Pinto, A.; Arioli, S. Antimicrobial activity of resveratrol-derived monomers and dimers against foodborne pathogens. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, J.; Li, B.; Xiao, W.; Hu, J.; Xie, J.; Yuan, J.; Wang, L. Longistylin A, a natural stilbene isolated from the leaves of Cajanus cajan, exhibits significant anti-MRSA activity. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gerits, E.; Defraine, V.; Vandamme, K.; De Cremer, K.; De Brucker, K.; Thevissen, K.; Cammue, B.P.; Beullens, S.; Fauvart, M.; Verstraeten, N.; et al. Repurposing Toremifene for Treatment of Oral Bacterial Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01846-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Catinella, G.; Mattio, L.M.; Musso, L.; Arioli, S.; Mora, D.; Beretta, G.I.; Zaffaroni, N.; Pinto, A.; Dallavalle, S. Structural Requirements of Benzofuran Derivatives Dehydro-δ- and Dehydro-ε-viniferin for Antimicrobial Activity Against the Foodborne Pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lim, Y.R.I.; Preshaw, P.M.; Lim, L.P.; Ong, M.M.A.; Lin, H.S.; Tan, K.S. Pterostilbene complexed with cyclodextrin exerts antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, K.; Hou, W.; Xu, X.F.; Chen, Q.; Li, Z.; Lin, J.; Chen, W.M. Biological evaluation and chemoproteomics reveal potential antibacterial targets of a cajaninstilbene-acid analogue. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 188, 112026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Geng, Z.Z.; Zhang, J.J.; Lin, J.; Huang, M.Y.; An, L.K.; Zhang, H.B.; Sun, P.H.; Ye, W.C.; Chen, W.M. Novel cajaninstilbene acid derivatives as antibacterial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 100, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goddard, T.N.; Patel, J.; Park, H.B.; Crawford, J.M. Dimeric Stilbene Antibiotics Target the Bacterial Cell Wall in Drug-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens. Biochemistry 2020, 59, 1966–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hrast, M.; Rožman, K.; Ogris, I.; Škedelj, V.; Patin, D.; Sova, M.; Barreteau, H.; Gobec, S.; Grdadolnik, S.G.; Zega, A. Evaluation of the published kinase inhibitor set to identify multiple inhibitors of bacterial ATP-dependent mur ligases. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019, 34, 1010–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Man, N.Y.T.; Knight, D.R.; Stewart, S.G.; McKinley, A.J.; Riley, T.V.; Hammer, K.A. Spectrum of antibacterial activity and mode of action of a novel tris-stilbene bacteriostatic compound. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, X.Z.; Cheng, A.X.; Sun, L.M.; Lou, H.X. Effect of plagiochin E, an antifungal macrocyclic bis(bibenzyl), on cell wall chitin synthesis in Candida albicans. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2008, 29, 1478–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Q.; Guo, X.; Jiang, G.; Wu, G.; Miao, H.; Liu, K.; Chen, S.; Sakamoto, N.; Kuno, T.; Yao, F.; et al. NADPH-Cytochrome P450 Reductase Ccr1 Is a Target of Tamoxifen and Participates in Its Antifungal Activity via Regulating Cell Wall Integrity in Fission Yeast. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00079-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mora-Pale, M.; Bhan, N.; Masuko, S.; James, P.; Wood, J.; McCallum, S.; Linhardt, R.J.; Dordick, J.S.; Koffas, M.A. Antimicrobial mechanism of resveratrol-trans-dihydrodimer produced from peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of resveratrol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 2417–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tang, K.W.; Yang, S.C.; Tseng, C.H. Design, Synthesis, and Anti-Bacterial Evaluation of Triazolyl-Pterostilbene Derivatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kim, S.; Lee, D.G. Oxyresveratrol-induced DNA cleavage triggers apoptotic response in Candida albicans. Microbiology 2018, 164, 1112–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, W.; Lee, D.G. Resveratrol induces membrane and DNA disruption via pro-oxidant activity against Salmonella typhimurium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 489, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, J.; Lee, D.G. Novel antifungal mechanism of resveratrol: Apoptosis inducer in Candida albicans. Curr. Microbiol. 2015, 70, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, X.Z.; Cheng, A.X.; Sun, L.M.; Sun, S.J.; Lou, H.X. Plagiochin E, an antifungal bis(bibenzyl), exerts its antifungal activity through mitochondrial dysfunction-induced reactive oxygen species accumulation in Candida albicans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, X.Z.; Chang, W.Q.; Cheng, A.X.; Sun, L.M.; Lou, H.X. Plagiochin E, an antifungal active macrocyclic bis(bibenzyl), induced apoptosis in Candida albicans through a metacaspase-dependent apoptotic pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Gen. Subj. 2010, 1800, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dadi, P.K.; Ahmad, M.; Ahmad, Z. Inhibition of ATPase activity of Escherichia coli ATP synthase by polyphenols. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2009, 45, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hwang, D.; Lim, Y.H. Resveratrol antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli is mediated by Z-ring formation inhibition via suppression of FtsZ expression. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tan, S.; Hua, X.; Xue, Z.; Ma, J. Cajanin Stilbene Acid Inhibited Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus by Inhibiting Phosphotransferase System. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, X.; Fang, Y.; Jaiseng, W.; Hu, L.; Lu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Furuyashiki, T. Characterization of Tamoxifen as an Antifungal Agent Using the Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Model Organism. Kobe J. Med. Sci. 2015, 61, e54–e63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Dolan, K.; Montgomery, S.; Buchheit, B.; Didone, L.; Wellington, M.; Krysan, D.J. Antifungal activity of tamoxifen: In vitro and in vivo activities and mechanistic characterization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3337–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Butts, A.; Koselny, K.; Chabrier-Roselló, Y.; Semighini, C.P.; Brown, J.C.; Wang, X.; Annadurai, S.; DiDone, L.; Tabroff, J.; Childers-We, J.R.; et al. Estrogen receptor antagonists are anti-cryptococcal agents that directly bind EF hand proteins and synergize with fluconazole in vivo. mBio 2014, 5, e00765-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ouyang, P.; He, X.; Yuan, Z.W.; Yin, Z.Q.; Fu, H.; Lin, J.; He, C.; Liang, X.; Lv, C.; Shu, G.; et al. Erianin against Staphylococcus aureus Infection via Inhibiting Sortase A. Toxins 2018, 10, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lee, K.; Lee, J.h.; Ryu, S.y.; Cho, M.h.; Lee, J. Stilbenes reduce Staphylococcus aureus hemolysis, biofilm formation, and virulence. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2014, 11, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Duan, J.; Li, M.; Hao, Z.; Shen, X.; Liu, L.; Jin, Y.; Wang, S.; Guo, Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, L.; et al. Subinhibitory concentrations of resveratrol reduce alpha-hemolysin production in Staphylococcus aureus isolates by downregulating saeRS. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Guo, R.H.; Gong, Y.; Kim, S.Y.; Rhee, J.H.; Kim, Y.R. DIDS inhibits Vibrio vulnificus cytotoxicity by interfering with TolC-mediated RtxA1 toxin secretion. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 884, 173407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ho Sui, S.J.; Lo, R.; Fernandes, A.R.; Caulfield, M.D.; Lerman, J.A.; Xie, L.; Bourne, P.E.; Baillie, D.l.; Brinkman, F.S. Raloxifene attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyocyanin production and virulence. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2012, 40, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zetterström, C.E.; Hasselgren, J.; Salin, O.; Davis, R.A.; Quinn, R.J.; Sundin, C.; Elofsson, M. The resveratrol tetramer (-)-hopeaphenol inhibits type III secretion in the gram-negative pathogens Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Davis, R.A.; Beattie, K.D.; Xu, M.; Yang, X.; Yin, S.; Holla, H.; Healy, P.C.; Sykes, M.; Shelper, T.; Avery, V.M.; et al. Solving the supply of resveratrol tetramers from Papua New Guinean rainforest anisoptera species that inhibit bacterial type III secretion systems. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2633–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kang, J.E.; Yoo, N.; Jeon, B.J.; Kim, B.S.; Chung, E.H. Resveratrol Oligomers, Plant-Produced Natural Products With Anti-virulence and Plant Immune-Priming Roles. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 885625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kang, J.E.; Jeon, B.J.; Park, M.Y.; Yang, H.J.; Kwon, J.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, B.s. Inhibition of the type III secretion system of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 by resveratrol oligomers identified in Vitis vinifera L. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 2294–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wang, W.B.; Lai, H.C.; Hsueh, P.R.; Chiou, R.Y.; Lin, S.B.; Liaw, S.J. Inhibition of swarming and virulence factor expression in Proteus mirabilis by resveratrol. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lou, F.; Wang, K.; Hou, Y.; Shang, X.; Tang, F. Inhibitory effect of resveratrol on swimming motility and adhesion ability against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Microb. Pathog. 2023, 184, 106323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kugaji, M.S.; Kumbar, V.M.; Peram, M.R.; Patil, S.; Bhat, K.G.; Diwan, P.V. Effect of Resveratrol on biofilm formation and virulence factor gene expression of Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontal disease. APMIS 2019, 127, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Augustine, N.; Goel, A.K.; Sivakumar, K.C.; Kumar, R.A.; Thomas, S. Resveratrol—A potential inhibitor of biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Li, J.; Wu, T.; Peng, W.; Zhu, Y. Effects of resveratrol on cariogenic virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Guo, R.; Peng, W.; Yang, H.; Yao, C.; Yu, J.; Huang, C. Evaluation of resveratrol-doped adhesive with advanced dentin bond durability. J. Dent. 2021, 114, 103817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Vasavi, H.S.; Sudeep, H.V.; Lingaraju, H.B.; Shyam Prasad, K. Bioavailability-enhanced Resveramax™ modulates quorum sensing and inhibits biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 104, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rosman, C.W.K.; van der Mei, H.C.; Sjollema, J. Influence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials on micrococcal nuclease and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.G.; Raorane, C.J.; Ryu, S.Y.; Shim, J.J.; Lee, J. The anti-biofilm and anti-virulence activities of trans-resveratrol and oxyresveratrol against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Biofouling 2019, 35, 758–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nijampatnam, B.; Zhang, H.; Cai, X.; Michalek, S.M.; Wu, H.; Velu, S.E. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans Biofilms by the Natural Stilbene Piceatannol Through the Inhibition of Glucosyltransferases. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 8378–8385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wu, J.; Fan, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, X.; Zou, J.; Huang, R. Effects of the natural compound, oxyresveratrol, on the growth of Streptococcus mutans, and on biofilm formation, acid production, and virulence gene expression. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2020, 128, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Xu, X.J.; Zeng, T.; Huang, Z.X.; Xu, X.F.; Lin, J.; Chen, W.M. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cajaninstilbene Acid and Amorfrutins A and B as Inhibitors of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum Sensing System. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 2621–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Huang, Z.X.; Yu, J.H.; Xu, X.J.; Xu, X.F.; Zeng, T.; Lin, J.; Chen, W.M. Cajaninstilbene acid analogues as novel quorum sensing and biofilm inhibitors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 148, 104414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, L.; Guo, F.; Ren, L.; Yang, R.; Li, Y.; Lou, H. In vivo inhibitory effect on the biofilm formation of Candida albicans by liverwort derived riccardin D. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Cheng, A.; Sun, L.; Wu, X.; Lou, H. The inhibitory effect of a macrocyclic bisbibenzyl riccardin D on the biofilms of Candida albicans. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 1417–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, D.D.; Zhao, L.X.; Mylonakis, E.; Hu, G.H.; Zou, Y.; Huang, T.K.; Yan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.Y. In vitro and in vivo activities of pterostilbene against Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 2344–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nøhr-Meldgaard, K.; Ovsepian, A.; Ingmer, H.; Vestergaard, M. Resveratrol enhances the efficacy of aminoglycosides against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nelson, L.K.; D’Amours, G.H.; Sproule-Willoughby, K.M.; Morck, D.W.; Ceri, H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems are important for infection and inflammation in a rat prostatitis model. Microbiology 2009, 155, 2612–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhou, J.W.; Chen, T.T.; Tan, X.J.; Sheng, J.Y.; Jia, A.Q. Can the quorum sensing inhibitor resveratrol function as an aminoglycoside antibiotic accelerant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa? Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, N.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Niu, X.; Deng, X.; Wang, J. Pterostilbene restores carbapenem susceptibility in New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates by inhibiting the activity of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 4548–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jia, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Efferth, T.; Liu, S.; Hua, X. Cajanin stilbene acid: A direct inhibitor of colistin resistance protein MCR-1 that restores the efficacy of polymyxin B against resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Phytomedicine 2023, 114, 154803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hwang, D.; Lim, Y.H. Resveratrol controls Escherichia coli growth by inhibiting the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2019, 366, fnz030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sousa, V.; Luís, Â.; Oleastro, M.; Domingues, F.; Ferreira, S. Polyphenols as resistance modulators in Arcobacter butzleri. Folia Microbiol. 2019, 64, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ferreira, S.; Silva, F.; Queiroz, J.A.; Oleastro, M.; Domingues, F.C. Resveratrol against Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus: Activity and effect on cellular functions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 180, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shi, M.; Bai, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, L.; Cheng, F.; Zhang, J. Mechanism of Synergy between Piceatannol and Ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yang, B.; Yao, H.; Li, D.; Liu, Z. The phosphatidylglycerol phosphate synthase PgsA utilizes a trifurcated amphipathic cavity for catalysis at the membrane-cytosol interface. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 2021, 3, 312–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Breukink, E.; de Kruijff, B. Lipid II as a target for antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kattke, M.D.; Gosschalk, J.E.; Martinez, O.E.; Kumar, G.; Gale, R.T.; Cascio, D.; Sawaya, M.R.; Philips, M.; Brown, E.D.; Clubb, R.T. Structure and mechanism of TagA, a novel membrane-associated glycosyltransferase that produces wall teichoic acids in pathogenic bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yang, C.S.; Huang, W.C.; Ko, T.P.; Wang, Y.C.; Wang, A.H.; Chen, Y. Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of TagH reveals a potential drug targeting site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 536, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tiedje, C.; Holland, D.G.; Just, U.; Höfken, T. Proteins involved in sterol synthesis interact with Ste20 and regulate cell polarity. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120, 3613–3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bock, F.J.; Tait, S.W.G. Mitochondria as multifaceted regulators of cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Barrows, J.M.; Goley, E.D. FtsZ dynamics in bacterial division: What, how, and why? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2021, 68, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Min, H.; Seok, Y.J. Phosphotransferase system sugars immediately induce mutations of Cra in an Escherichia coli ptsH mutant. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 5425–5436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Huang, K.J.; Lin, S.H.; Lin, M.R.; Ku, H.; Szkaradek, N.; Marona, H.; Hsu, A.; Shiuan, D. Xanthone derivatives could be potential antibiotics: Virtual screening for the inhibitors of enzyme I of bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system. J. Antibiot. 2013, 66, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Brockerhoff, S.E.; Stevens, R.C.; Davis, T.N. The unconventional myosin, Myo2p, is a calmodulin target at sites of cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 124, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Butts, A.; Martin, J.A.; DiDone, L.; Bradley, E.K.; Mutz, M.; Krysan, D.J. Structure-activity relationships for the antifungal activity of selective estrogen receptor antagonists related to tamoxifen. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kong, C.; Neoh, H.M.; Nathan, S. Targeting Staphylococcus aureus Toxins: A Potential form of Anti-Virulence Therapy. Toxins 2016, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Allen, R.C.; Popat, R.; Diggle, S.P.; Brown, S.P. Targeting virulence: Can we make evolution-proof drugs? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lowy, F.D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mazmanian, S.K.; Ton-That, H.; Su, K.; Schneewind, O. An iron-regulated sortase anchors a class of surface protein during Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 2293–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Mazmanian, S.K.; Liu, G.; Jensen, E.R.; Lenoy, E.; Schneewind, O. Staphylococcus aureus sortase mutants defective in the display of surface proteins and in the pathogenesis of animal infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5510–5515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ng, T.B.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.T. Antioxidative activity of natural products from plants. Life Sci. 2000, 66, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Liu, Q.; Yeo, W.S.; Bae, T. The SaeRS Two-Component System of Staphylococcus aureus. Genes 2016, 7, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lee, S.; Song, S.; Lee, M.; Hwang, S.; Kim, J.S.; Ha, N.C.; Lee, K. Interaction between the α-barrel tip of Vibrio vulnificus TolC homologs and AcrA implies the adapter bridging model. J. Microbiol. 2014, 52, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Willcox, M.D.P.; Zhu, H.; Conibear, T.C.R.; Hume, E.B.H.; Givskov, M.; Kjelleberg, S.; Rice, S.A. Role of quorum sensing by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in microbial keratitis and cystic fibrosis. Microbiology 2008, 154, 2184–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Shaulov, L.; Gershberg, J.; Deng, W.; Finlay, B.B.; Sal-Man, N. The Ruler Protein EscP of the Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Type III Secretion System Is Involved in Calcium Sensing and Secretion Hierarchy Regulation by Interacting with the Gatekeeper Protein SepL. mBio 2017, 8, e01733-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Xiao, Y.; Hutcheson, S.W. A single promoter sequence recognized by a newly identified alternate sigma factor directs expression of pathogenicity and host range determinants in Pseudomonas syringae. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 3089–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kim, J.F.; Wei, Z.M.; Beer, S.V. The hrpA and hrpC operons of Erwinia amylovora encode components of a type III pathway that secretes harpin. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 1690–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Flemming, H.C.; Wuertz, S. Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rabin, N.; Zheng, Y.; Opoku-Temeng, C.; Du, Y.; Bonsu, E.; Sintim, H.O. Biofilm formation mechanisms and targets for developing antibiofilm agents. Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 493–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ramadan, H.H. Chronic rhinosinusitis and bacterial biofilms. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 14, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Davies, D. Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J.w.; Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Costerton, J.W.; Lewandowski, Z.; Caldwell, D.E.; Korber, D.R.; Lappin-Scott, H.M. Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1995, 49, 711–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nickel, J.C.; Ruseska, I.; Wright, J.B.; Costerton, J.W. Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985, 27, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Venkatesan, N.; Perumal, G.; Doble, M. Bacterial resistance in biofilm-associated bacteria. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1743–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hausner, M.; Wuertz, S. High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by quantitative in situ analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3710–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Yang, J.H.; Wright, S.N.; Hamblin, M.; McCloskey, D.; Alcantar, M.A.; Schrübbers, L.; Lopatkin, A.J.; Satish, S.; Nili, A.; Palsson, B.O.; et al. A White-Box Machine Learning Approach for Revealing Antibiotic Mechanisms of Action. Cell 2019, 177, 1649–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. O’Toole, G.A.; Kolter, R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Pratt, L.A.; Kolter, R. Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: Roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Walker, S.L.; Redman, J.a.; Elimelech, M. Role of Cell Surface Lipopolysaccharides in Escherichia coli K12 adhesion and transport. Langmuir 2004, 20, 7736–7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lee, S.A.; Wallis, C.M.; Rogers, E.E.; Burbank, L.p. Grapevine phenolic compounds influence cell surface adhesion of Xylella fastidiosa and bind to lipopolysaccharide. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Krebs, S.J.; Taylor, R.K. Protection and attachment of Vibrio cholerae mediated by the toxin-coregulated pilus in the infant mouse model. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 5260–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Chen, J.; Byun, H.; She, Q.; Liu, Z.; Ruggeberg, K.G.; Pu, Q.; Jung, I.J.; Zhu, D.; Brockett, M.R.; Hsiao, A.; et al. S-Nitrosylation of the virulence regulator AphB promotes Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Götz, F. Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 43, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Blankenship, J.R.; Mitchell, A.P. How to build a biofilm: A fungal perspective. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2006, 9, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Rasamiravaka, T.; Vandeputte, O.M.; Pottier, L.; Huet, J.; Rabemanantsoa, C.; Kiendrebeogo, M.; Andriantsimahavandy, A.; Rasamindrakotroka, A.; Stévigny, C.; Duez, P.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Formation and Persistence, along with the Production of Quorum Sensing-Dependent Virulence Factors, Are Disrupted by a Triterpenoid Coumarate Ester Isolated from Dalbergia trichocarpa, a Tropical Legume. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Limoli, D.H.; Jones, C.J.; Wozniak, D.J. Bacterial Extracellular Polysaccharides in Biofilm Formation and Function. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Wu, J.; Jiang, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Huang, R. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation by the Joint Action of Oxyresveratrol and Lactobacillus casei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e0243621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Chen, Y.; Gozzi, K.; Yan, F.; Chai, Y. Acetic Acid Acts as a Volatile Signal to Stimulate Bacterial Biofilm Formation. mBio 2015, 6, e00392-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Ng, W.L.; Bassler, B.L. Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 197–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Liu, X.; Jia, M.; Wang, J.; Cheng, H.; Cai, Z.; Yu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Cell division factor ZapE regulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation by impacting the pqs quorum sensing system. mLife 2023, 2, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Saunders, S.H.; Tse, E.C.M.; Yates, M.D.; Otero, F.J.; Trammell, S.A.; Stemp, E.D.A.; Barton, J.K.; Tender, L.M.; Newman, D.K. Extracellular DNA Promotes Efficient Extracellular Electron Transfer by Pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Cell 2020, 182, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Costa, K.C.; Glasser, N.R.; Conway, S.J.; Newman, D.K. Pyocyanin degradation by a tautomerizing demethylase inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Science 2017, 355, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Mitscher, L.A.; Park, Y.H.; Alshamma, A.; Hudson, P.B.; Haas, T. Amorfrutin A and B, bibenzyl antimicrobial agents from Amorpha fruticosa. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fan, Y.; He, H.; Dong, Y.; Pan, H. Hyphae-specific genes HGC1, ALS3, HWP1, and ECE1 and relevant signaling pathways in Candida albicans. Mycopathologia 2013, 176, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Uppuluri, P.; Chaturvedi, A.k.; Srinivasan, A.; Banerjee, M.; Ramasubramaniam, A.k.; Köhler, J.r.; Kadosh, D.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Dispersion as an important step in the Candida albicans biofilm developmental cycle. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Darby, E.M.; Trampari, E.; Siasat, P.; Gaya, M.S.; Alav, I.; Webber, M.A.; Blair, J.M.A. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Vestergaard, M.; Leng, B.; Haaber, J.; Bojer, M.S.; Vegge, C.S.; Ingmer, H. Genome-Wide Identification of Antimicrobial Intrinsic Resistance Determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Liu, A.; Tran, L.; Becket, E.; Lee, K.; Chinn, L.; Park, E.; Tran, K.; Miller, J.H. Antibiotic sensitivity profiles determined with an Escherichia coli gene knockout collection: Generating an antibiotic bar code. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1393–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Shenkutie, A.M.; Yao, M.Z.; Siu, G.K.; Wong, B.K.C.; Leung, P.H. Biofilm-Induced Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.H.; Feng, Y. Towards Understanding MCR-like Colistin Resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 794–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Pérez, A.; Poza, M.; Fernández, A.; Fernández-Mdel, C.; Mallo, S.; Merino, M.; Rumbo-Feal, S.; Cabral, M.P.; Bou, G. Involvement of the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in the resistance, fitness, and virulence of Enterobacter cloacae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2084–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Du, D.; Wang, Z.; James, N.R.; Voss, J.E.; Klimont, E.; Ohene-Agyei, T.; Venter, H.; Chiu, W.; Luisi, B.F. Structure of the AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump. Nature 2014, 509, 512–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Lowrence, R.C.; Subramaniapillai, S.G.; Ulaganathan, V.; Nagarajan, S. Tackling drug resistance with efflux pump inhibitors: From bacteria to cancerous cells. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 45, 334–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Brown, E.D.; Wright, G.D. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature 2016, 529, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Barani, M.; Bilal, M.; Sabir, F.; Rahdar, A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Nanotechnology in ovarian cancer: Diagnosis and treatment. Life Sci. 2021, 266, 118914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pharmaceutics 16 00663 g001
Figure 1. Skeleton characteristics and representatives of three kinds of stilbenoids. Stilbenoids can be divided into three categories according to their chemical structure, including stilbene, bibenzyl and phenanthrenoid.
Figure 1. Skeleton characteristics and representatives of three kinds of stilbenoids. Stilbenoids can be divided into three categories according to their chemical structure, including stilbene, bibenzyl and phenanthrenoid.
Pharmaceutics 16 00663 g001
Pharmaceutics 16 00663 g002
Figure 2. Overview of the antimicrobial mechanisms of stilbenoids. The red arrow represents activation. The red T represents inhibition. The red cross means the reaction is blocked.
Figure 2. Overview of the antimicrobial mechanisms of stilbenoids. The red arrow represents activation. The red T represents inhibition. The red cross means the reaction is blocked.
Pharmaceutics 16 00663 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Li, Y.; Xiong, B.; Qiu, S. Progress of Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Stilbenoids. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050663

AMA Style

Li X, Li Y, Xiong B, Qiu S. Progress of Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Stilbenoids. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(5):663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050663

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiancai, Yongqing Li, Binghong Xiong, and Shengxiang Qiu. 2024. "Progress of Antimicrobial Mechanisms of Stilbenoids" Pharmaceutics 16, no. 5: 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16050663

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop