Statement of Peer Review
- Type of peer review: double-blind.
- Conference submission management system: CMT via https://cmt3.research.microsoft.com/AIBSD2024
- Number of submissions sent for review: 21.
- Number of submissions accepted: eight submissions are accepted to be presented at the 2nd AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence with Biased or Scarce Data (AIBSD), and five of those eight accepted submissions are encouraged to further submit to MDPI for publication.
- Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): ~38% for the submissions presented at the 2nd AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence with Biased or Scarce Data (AIBSD); ~24% for the submissions encouraged to further submit to MDPI for publication.
- Average number of reviews per paper: two.
- Total number of reviewers involved: 18.
- Any additional information on the review process: The average number of papers assigned to each reviewer is only 2~3 to ensure the review quality.
Conflicts of Interest
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Peng, K.-C.; Aich, A.; Wu, Z. Statement of Peer Review. Comput. Sci. Math. Forum 2024, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2024009001
Peng K-C, Aich A, Wu Z. Statement of Peer Review. Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum. 2024; 9(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2024009001
Chicago/Turabian StylePeng, Kuan-Chuan, Abhishek Aich, and Ziyan Wu. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Computer Sciences & Mathematics Forum 9, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cmsf2024009001