Next Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of Bimetallic Nanostructures Using Vine Shoot Extracts—Characterization and Antimicrobial Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of PVA-Based Cryogels in the Cleaning Process of Contemporary Acrylic Paintings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Carbon Nanomaterials from Biomass Wastes †

National Institute for Research & Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry ICECHIM Bucharest, 202 Splaiul Independenței, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 17th International Symposium “Priorities of Chemistry for a Sustainable Development” PRIOCHEM, Bucharest, Romania, 27–29 October 2021.
Chem. Proc. 2022, 7(1), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007046
Published: 22 March 2022
Biomass represents carbon that has been sequestered from the environment by plants through photosynthesis and nutrition. Burning biomass is a polluting process that releases greenhouse gases (CO2, CO, NOx) into the atmosphere, and it should be avoided globally. An environmentally friendly biomass conversion method with plenty capitalization opportunities is represented by hermetic hydrothermal carbonization with super-heated sub-critical water [1,2]. Between 110–250 °C, super-heated water acts similar to a mild acidic solvent and breaks the hemicellulose structure by dehydro/carboxylation into alcohols, aldehydes, (poly)phenols, aminoacids, organic acids, and other water-soluble molecules, and the remaining ligno-cellulosic solid is called hydrochar and has adsorbent properties. Temperatures over 250 °C favor decarbonylation, denitrogenation, and aromatization reactions, which lead to a nano(micro)porous biochar and carbon nanomaterials. The residual biomass obtained from wheat straws was submitted to hydrothermal carbonization at temperatures between 140–260 °C, autogenerated pressures between 20–80 atm, and 1:5–1:10 biomass:water mass ratios. The obtained carbon nanomaterials were analytically characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), nitrogen adsorption/desorption porosimetry, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The TEM images showed carbon nanomaterials with different shapes, such as nanospheres, nanowhiskers, and carbon nanodots). FT-IR spectroscopy showed evidence of adsorption bands that were of higher intensities for hydrogen bonds and functional groups with oxygen at lower reaction temperatures and pressures. XRD analysis showed specific diffraction patterns for the graphitic carbon structures obtained at higher temperatures. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis demonstrated high N2 adsorption at P/P0 < 0.1, which indicates the presence of many micropores (<2 nm) as well as mesopores (2–50 nm) at 0.1 < P/P0 < 0.5, with a total surface area of 10–15 m2/g, which is 100 times higher than that of the initial raw materials. TGA showed evidence of a higher lignin-type carbon content with an increased reaction temperature. As a general conclusion, hydrothermal carbonization is a “green” and facile method of converting residual biomass into carbon nanomaterials with high porosity and a graphite-like structure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-O.D.; Methodology, S.-O.D.; Software, S.-O.D., G.I., V.R., R.-C.F., C.-A.N., B.T.; Validation, S.-O.D., V.R., R.-C.F. and F.O.; Formal Analysis, S.-O.D., G.I., V.R., R.-C.F., C.-A.N., B.T.; Investigation, S.-O.D., V.R., R.-C.F. and F.O.; Resources, F.O., V.R. and R.-C.F.; Data Curation, S.-O.D., V.R. and R.-C.F.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.-O.D.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.-O.D.; Visualization, All Authors; Supervision, V.R., F.O. and R.-C.F.; Project Administration, V.R.; Funding Acquisition, V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Government of Romania, Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization Nucleu Programme in the frame of the Chem-Ergent project PN19.23.03.01 Contract No. 23N/2019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, N.; Mohan, S.; Dinesha, P. Regimes of hydrochar yield from hydrothermal degradation of various lignocellulosic biomass: A review. J. Clean Prod. 2021, 288, 125629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Titirici, M.M.; White, R.J.; Brun, N.; Budarin, V.L.; Su, D.S.; del Monte, F.; Clarkd, J.H.; MacLachlan, M.J. Sustainable carbon materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 250–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dima, S.-O.; Ispas, G.; Raditoiu, V.; Fierascu, R.-C.; Nicolae, C.-A.; Trica, B.; Oancea, F. Carbon Nanomaterials from Biomass Wastes. Chem. Proc. 2022, 7, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007046

AMA Style

Dima S-O, Ispas G, Raditoiu V, Fierascu R-C, Nicolae C-A, Trica B, Oancea F. Carbon Nanomaterials from Biomass Wastes. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 7(1):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dima, Stefan-Ovidiu, Georgiana Ispas, Valentin Raditoiu, Radu-Claudiu Fierascu, Cristian-Andi Nicolae, Bogdan Trica, and Florin Oancea. 2022. "Carbon Nanomaterials from Biomass Wastes" Chemistry Proceedings 7, no. 1: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemproc2022007046

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop