Next Article in Journal
Replacing Part of Maltodextrin with Galactose in Early Life Diet Results in an Improved Body Composition and Energy Metabolism in a Mouse Model
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing the Dutch Adult Diet for 2030 and 2050 for Health and Sustainability, Based on EAT-Lancet Environmental Planetary Boundaries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Students and Healthy Eating: The Behavior–Intention Gap in an Unhealthy Food Environment †

HAS Green Academy, 5223 DE Den Bosch, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023, Belgrade, Serbia, 14–17 November 2023.
Proceedings 2023, 91(1), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091319
Published: 17 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023)

Abstract

:
Background and objectives: Our food environment has a large influence on what we eat. The food environment around five schools in ‘Education Boulevard’ in the city of ‘s-Hertogenbosch (The Netherlands) is not healthy. Approximately 30 food outlets are present, and over 90% of the food products these outlets offer fall outside of the Dutch nutritional guidelines for healthy products (wheel of five). The aim of this study was to investigate the eating behavior of students in this food environment and to study the potential difference between what students say they consume at or around school (survey) and their actual food buying behavior (observations). Methods: This study was conducted in two steps: 1. A total of 251 students of the ‘Education Boulevard’ (≥16 years) filled in a survey which asked the following: what do they eat at or around school and where do they buy/get these foods? 2. Based on the survey, the five most popular food outlets were identified. At these five food outlets, the buying behavior of 267 students were observed: what did they actually buy? Results: The top three products that the students said they buy in the survey were as follows: 1. breads/sandwiches (16% of all indicated products), 2. salads (14%), and 3. sandwich toppings (14%). Our observations, however, show different results. The top three bought foods were as follows: 1. (fried) snacks (27% of total bought products), 2. breads/sandwiches (26%), and 3. sugar-sweetened beverages (12%). Salads, which were mentioned in the survey as the second most frequently bought food, were actually only bought by 3 out of the 267 observed students. Of the 448 products that the students actually bought (based on the observations), 94% did not fit within the Dutch wheel of five for healthy products. Discussion: This study demonstrates that students’ food buying behavior is in line with the food on offer (>90% outside the wheel five) and underlines the need for interventions in the food environment. This study also highlights the intention–behavior gap, showing that what students say they do and what they actually do is not in line. Therefore, a survey is not the best method to study food buying behavior.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.P. and A.V.; methodology, H.P. and A.V.; data analysis, A.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.; writing—review and editing, A.d.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the HAS green academy, protocol code P2022 24, 18-01-2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verreijen, A.; de Leeuw, A.; Peppelenbos, H. Students and Healthy Eating: The Behavior–Intention Gap in an Unhealthy Food Environment. Proceedings 2023, 91, 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091319

AMA Style

Verreijen A, de Leeuw A, Peppelenbos H. Students and Healthy Eating: The Behavior–Intention Gap in an Unhealthy Food Environment. Proceedings. 2023; 91(1):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verreijen, Amely, Annick de Leeuw, and Herman Peppelenbos. 2023. "Students and Healthy Eating: The Behavior–Intention Gap in an Unhealthy Food Environment" Proceedings 91, no. 1: 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2023091319

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop