Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Impact of Oral Isotretinoin on the Menstrual Cycle: A Prospective Study on Predictors of Menstrual Irregularities
Previous Article in Journal
Diabetic Nephropathy, Retinopathy, and Functional Hypogonadism in a Patient with MODY10: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Machine Learning-Based Mortality Prediction in Chronic Kidney Disease among Heart Failure Patients: Insights and Outcomes from the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry

1
Cardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Specialty Hospital, Amman 12344, Jordan
2
Cardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid 22110, Jordan
3
Cardiology Section, Internal Medicine Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman 11942, Jordan
4
Department of Cardiology, Amman Surgical Hospital, Amman 11180, Jordan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(5), 831; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050831
Submission received: 7 April 2024 / Revised: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 14 May 2024 / Published: 19 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and debilitating condition that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems and adversely affects the quality of life of patients worldwide. Comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common among HF patients, as they share similar risk factors. This study aimed to identify the prognostic significance of multiple factors and their correlation with disease prognosis and outcomes in a Jordanian cohort. Materials and Methods: Data from the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry (JoHFR) were analyzed, encompassing medical records from acute and chronic HF patients attending public and private cardiology clinics and hospitals across Jordan. An online form was utilized for data collection, focusing on three kidney function tests, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine levels, with the eGFR calculated using the Cockcroft–Gault formula. We also built six machine learning models to predict mortality in our cohort. Results: From the JoHFR, 2151 HF patients were included, with 644, 1799, and 1927 records analyzed for eGFR, BUN, and creatinine levels, respectively. Age negatively impacted all measures (p ≤ 0.001), while smokers surprisingly showed better results than non-smokers (p ≤ 0.001). Males had more normal eGFR levels compared to females (p = 0.002). Comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, arrhythmias, and implanted devices were inversely related to eGFR (all with p-values <0.05). Higher BUN levels were associated with chronic HF, dyslipidemia, and ASCVD (p ≤ 0.001). Higher creatinine levels were linked to hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, arrhythmias, and previous HF history (all with p-values <0.05). Low eGFR levels were associated with increased mechanical ventilation needs (p = 0.049) and mortality (p ≤ 0.001), while BUN levels did not significantly affect these outcomes. Machine learning analysis employing the Random Forest Classifier revealed that length of hospital stay and creatinine >115 were the most significant predictors of mortality. The classifier achieved an accuracy of 90.02% with an AUC of 80.51%, indicating its efficacy in predictive modeling. Conclusions: This study reveals the intricate relationship among kidney function tests, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes in HF patients in Jordan, highlighting the importance of kidney function as a predictive tool. Integrating machine learning models into clinical practice may enhance the predictive accuracy of patient outcomes, thereby supporting a more personalized approach to managing HF and related kidney dysfunction. Further research is necessary to validate these findings and to develop innovative treatment strategies for the CKD population within the HF cohort.

1. Introduction

Among cardiovascular diseases, heart failure (HF) is a progressive condition and one of the leading causes of death globally. The prevalence of cardiac diseases continues to rise, with HF significantly affecting healthcare systems and the quality of life of millions worldwide [1,2,3]. HF patients face a high risk of comorbidities like chronic kidney disease (CKD), arterial hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (DM) due to shared risk factors such as older age, obesity, and tobacco use [4,5,6]. These comorbidities correlate with higher mortality risk, increased healthcare costs, and worse outcomes [4,7]. Most HF cases coexist with at least two chronic conditions, underscoring the need for comprehensive care [4,7].
The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines define CKD as a structural or functional kidney abnormality lasting more than three months [8]. CKD is characterized by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 and/or chronic kidney damage. Advanced stages of CKD are linked to poor prognosis, progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and death [8,9]. Patients with CKD have a higher prevalence of all forms of CVD, including myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral artery disease (PAD), and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) [8]. Serum creatinine levels and eGFR estimates are vital markers in managing HF patients [8,10]. Elevated creatinine levels (>0.3 mg/dL) are associated with increased hospital stay and mortality [11]. GFR depends on renal plasma flow and autoregulatory mechanisms like vasoconstriction of afferent and efferent arterioles, which maintain GFR despite cardiac output decline [10,12].
CKD often exacerbates HF and acts as a disease multiplier, increasing hospitalization and mortality risks [4,10]. Cardiorenal syndrome illustrates the bidirectional nature of heart and kidney disease, where impairment of one organ can lead to dysfunction in the other [4]. The ‘low flow theory’ proposes that renal hypoperfusion triggers baroreceptor activation, RAAS activation, and tubular/glomerular damage [7,12]. In the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, stage ≥3 CKD was associated with a 1.9-fold higher risk of HF [4,13,14].
Machine learning (ML) models have proven effective in managing cardiac diseases like HF [15,16]. Random Forest Classifiers aggregate predictions from multiple decision trees to create a more accurate predictive model. By reducing overfitting through averaging, the random forest approach enhances generalization and minimizes noise. This study aims to correlate kidney function measures (creatinine, BUN, and GFR) with outcomes in HF patients in Jordan and predict mortality using advanced machine learning techniques.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Setting

Data were used from the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry, which was made by gathering medical records of acute and chronic HF patients who reviewed public or private cardiology clinics and hospitals across Jordan. This registry method has been previously described. The characteristics of the JoHF registry and the protocol of our study were registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04829591). Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was taken from appropriate centers. Records were progressively followed up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to register new lab work and to see if new complications developed and, therefore, if they resulted in any change in the medication list.

2.2. Data Collection

An online form was used to collect the data; this form was filled out by healthcare professionals who had access to the systems. It contained 10 sections, which involved the personal medical history of the patient, the status of his/her heart failure, all labs/procedures conducted on the patient, outcomes of treatment such as the need for mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, and, lastly, whether morbidities or mortalities occurred.
In this study, we focused on studying the factors associated with the 3 different kidney function tests and how, therefore, these tests affect the outcomes. The first measure studied was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which was calculated using the Cockcroft GFR formula, which depended on age, weight, and creatinine level. The second test was the blood urea nitrogen (BUN), which is considered normal if the level is in-between 7–20 mg/dL and abnormally high when it is >20 mg/dL. The last measure studied was the creatinine level, which is normal when the level is ≤115 µmol/L and high when levels are >115 µmol/L. Acute HF was used when patients’ record was taken from the ER, whether it was the first presentation of HF or if it was an acute-on-chronic HF exacerbation. Mechanical ventilation was documented if it was required during patients’ stay in the hospital. Meanwhile, death was a 30-day mortality.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data were entered using Microsoft Office Excel 2019, then imported and analyzed using IBM SPSS v.25 software. The relationship between exposures and outcome was tested using the t-test and Chi-square for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A p-value <0.050 was considered statistically significant. We employed multiple imputations in R (version 4.4.0) using the “mice” package to address missing data, generating five imputed datasets through Predictive Mean Matching (PMM). Post-imputation, the same statistical analyses were performed on each dataset, with results pooled to provide final estimates. This approach ensured robust handling of missing data and enhanced the reliability of our findings, thereby accounting for the uncertainty introduced by the imputation of missing data.

2.4. Machine Learning Analysis

This study utilized a machine learning-based approach for predicting ‘Death’. For handling missing values, median imputation was applied to numerical columns, while the most frequent value was used for categorical columns. All numerical data were standardized using a StandardScaler (version 0.24), ensuring comparability across features. Recursive Feature Elimination with Cross-Validation (RFECV) was utilized, employing a Random Forest Classifier as the estimator to identify the most relevant features for predicting the target variable. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets, with 40% of the data reserved for the combined validation and test sets. To mitigate class imbalance, the training set underwent resampling using the SMOTEENN technique, which combines Synthetic Minority Over-sampling (SMOTE) with Edited Nearest Neighbors (ENN), improving the model’s performance on minority classes.
A grid search with fivefold cross-validation was performed on the resampled training data to find the optimal set of hyperparameters. The best parameters identified were then used to train the final models. Six different machine learning models were evaluated to determine the most effective in predicting the target variable: Random Forest Classifier (RFC), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), AdaBoost Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC). The models were assessed using several metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). To assess the influence of each feature on the model’s predictions, we utilized Permutation Feature Importance. This method evaluates the importance of each feature by observing the effect on model accuracy when the feature’s values are randomly shuffled, thereby disrupting the association between the feature and the outcome. This approach provides a straightforward and intuitive means of understanding feature relevance in the context of the model’s predictive capabilities.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Included Patients

Based on Jordan’s heart failure registry (JoHFR), 2151 heart failure patients were included; out of them, 644 medical records were used to study eGFR, 1799 records were used to study BUN, and lastly, 1927 records were used to study creatinine levels. Across all tests, age had a negative effect (p ≤ 0.001); meanwhile, surprisingly, smokers had better results than nonsmokers (p ≤ 0.001).

3.2. The Association between Patients’ Characteristics and Kidney Function

eGFR was normal in 371 patients but low in 273, as shown in Table 1. The total female count was 241, 121 of which had low eGFR. Meanwhile, the total male count was 403, with 152 patients with low eGFR. Therefore, males had more normal eGFR levels than females (p = 0.002). Moreover, a positive medical history of hypertension, diabetes, arrythmias, and implanted devices all affected eGFR levels inversely (all with p-values < 0.05). Patients with a family history of ASCVD or premature deaths had lower eGFR results compared to their counterparts (all with p-values <0.05). BUN was normal in 437 patients and high in 1362 patients, as shown in Table 2. In total, 174 males and 263 females had normal BUN levels. However, 594 males and 768 females had high BUN. For patients with chronic HF, dyslipidemia, and a previous history of ASCVD, BUN results were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.001 for all). Family history of premature deaths and ASCVD affected BUN levels negatively (p ≤ 0.001 for both). As for creatinine levels, 1113 patients had normal levels while 814 patients had abnormally high levels, as shown in Table 3. The distribution between males and females was as follows: the total number of males was 808, and 345 had high Cr. Meanwhile, females were 1119, out of them 469 had high Cr. Co-morbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, arrhythmias, and prior history of HF all led to higher Cr levels (all with p-values <0.05). Moreover, chronic HF patients had a higher reading of Cr compared to acute HF (p = 0.004). A positive family history of ASCVD was associated with high Cr (p ≤ 0.001). Regarding outcomes, patients with low eGFR levels had higher rates of need of mechanical ventilation (p ≤ 0.001) and death (p ≤ 0.001). On the other hand, higher levels of BUN did not affect the need for mechanical ventilation or death. Moreover, the need for mechanical ventilation and death rates were both higher in patients with high Cr levels.

3.3. Machine Learning Model Performance

In the comparative analysis of predictive models shown in Table 4, the Random Forest Classifier (RFC) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) showed similar accuracy (90.02%), with RFC exhibiting a slightly higher Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 80.51%, compared to 78.21% for XGBoost (Figure 1). Logistic Regression (LR) demonstrated a balance between sensitivity (72.09%) and specificity (73.97%), with an AUC of 79.15%. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, while having lower accuracy (80.74%), showed a moderate AUC of 73.65%. The specificity of the models varied, with RFC showing the highest (96.39%) and LR the lowest (73.97%).

3.4. Feature Importance Analysis

The Permutation Feature Importance analysis highlighted length of hospital stay and creatinine >115 as the most significant features influencing the model’s predictions (Figure 2). Other features, such as ‘Mechanical Ventilation,’ chronic kidney disease, and dyslipidemia, also showed a notable impact on the model’s performance. Conversely, factors like ‘Alcohol Consumption’ and ‘Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate <60’ had the least impact, suggesting that their roles in predicting the target variable Death are less critical in the context of the models tested.

4. Discussion

The heart and kidneys play a significant role in maintaining fluid homeostasis and normal blood pressure in the body [7]. Individuals with CKD have mortality rates that are more than double the rate in the general population [8]. Our results show that patients with lower eGFR levels had higher mortality rates (19.1%), whereas HF patients with normal eGFR were 5.9%. Approximately more than 50% of patients with CKD suffer and die from CVD [7,8]. Cardio-renal syndrome is characterized based on which organ is primarily affected and whether it is acute or chronic damage [7]. In fact, patients with CKD are more likely to die from CVD than to progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [8]. For that reason, improving or worsening the accuracy of GFR assessment has implications at the individual and population levels [7,17]. This study is about the multifaceted relationship between multiple kidney function measures, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients, shedding light on several intriguing findings. For age, we observed a notable trend among older patients who exhibited higher Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) levels, increased Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) levels, and elevated creatinine (Cr) levels. Sex disparities in kidney health became apparent, with males displaying more normal eGFR levels than females, suggesting potential gender-related variations in kidney function. Females were more likely to have lower eGFR levels for a count of 121 out of 241; in comparison to males, only 152 out of 403 had low eGFR. This could be due to the higher body fat distribution in females; obesity, specifically central, plays a role in abnormal kidney function tests. Almost 30% of CKD Medicare patients have HF, compared with just 6% of Medicare patients without CKD [8]. Even the risk of incident HF is threefold greater in individuals with eGFR 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 [8,10]. This age–gender-related phenomenon raises questions about the intricate interplay between these factors and kidney health. The impact of common comorbidities was evident in our findings. Patients with diabetes mellitus displayed lower GFR and elevated Cr levels, indicating a potential link between diabetes and kidney dysfunction. Similarly, hypertensive patients exhibited lower GFR and higher Cr levels, underscoring the well-established association between high blood pressure and renal health. These results emphasize the need to proactively manage these conditions to preserve kidney function. Smokers surprisingly manifested lower BUN and Cr levels and higher GFR levels; 41.6% had normal eGFR on the other hand, and 19.5% had low eGFR. However, the unlimited adverse effects of smoking on overall health necessitate a cautious interpretation of these results. The smoker’s paradox is an interesting phenomenon where smokers sometimes appear to have better cardiovascular outcomes than non-smokers [18]. A few factors could explain this anomaly. For instance, smokers in this study may have been younger or had fewer baseline health risks compared to non-smokers, influencing kidney function measurements. Another possibility is survival bias; those with severe kidney disease or other health conditions might have quit smoking, leaving a relatively healthier group of current smokers. Confounding factors like socioeconomic status, diet, and healthcare access might also play a part. Moreover, chronic inflammation due to smoking could alter biochemical pathways, potentially masking kidney function problems. While the findings are intriguing, they need careful interpretation and more research to understand the relationship between smoking and kidney function fully. Patients with dyslipidemia had lower BUN (298 out of 437) and Cr levels, suggesting better kidney health. By contrast, atherosclerosis patients had lower GFR levels and higher bilirubin and Cr levels, highlighting the tangled connection between cardiovascular health and kidney function. Arrhythmias were notably more prevalent in patients with higher Cr levels and lower GFR levels.
For the clinical outcomes, represented by a number of hospital admissions, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality rate, a prognostic value of kidney function in heart failure patients was evident. Elevated Cr levels were linked to a higher need for mechanical ventilation (6.7%) and an increased mortality rate (17%) vs. 3.4% and 5%, respectively. Similarly, lower GFR levels were associated with an increased need for mechanical ventilation and higher mortality, reinforcing the critical role of kidney function in predicting patient outcomes. CKD appears more common in HFpEF. Nevertheless, worse outcomes are mostly related to HFpEF and HFrEF [7]. The prevalence of CKD is higher among patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), ranging from 30 to 60%, depending on the definition used [10]. Natriuretic peptides can be elevated, among others, because of the low elimination of the molecules by the injured kidneys [7]. Increased levels of BNP and NT-proBNP may signal an elevated risk for accelerated progression of CKD to ESRD [7]. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) may be an additional marker to detect the involvement of kidneys in ventricular stress [7]. Remarkably, bilirubin levels did not significantly impact the number of admissions or the need for mechanical ventilation, signifying a distinct role for bilirubin in this context. A decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) seems to be the most significant determinant of the overall progression of HF [7]. Damman et al. have reported that nearly half of the patients with heart failure suffer from decreased eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were 18/1000 person years [7]. GFR estimation and creatinine concentration are nowadays recommended to assess and classify the impairment and dysfunction of the kidneys in HF [10]. In hospital, worsening renal function (WRF), which is often defined as an increase in creatinine of at least 0.3 mg/dL, is observed in 23% of HF patients [5,10]. The employment of machine learning models, particularly the Random Forest Classifier, has proven to be a powerful analytical tool in our study. The Random Forest’s higher AUC indicates its robustness in handling the complexity and nuances within our dataset, thus providing a reliable prediction for mortality in heart failure patients. This aligns with the evidence suggesting that machine learning models can capture interactions between clinical variables more effectively than traditional statistical methods. The model’s ability to discern the prognostic importance of variables like ‘Length of Hospital Stay’ and ‘Creatinine >115’ further emphasizes its utility in clinical settings. Moreover, the observed predictive power of the Random Forest Classifier underscores the potential for implementing such AI-driven tools in healthcare systems to aid in early detection and intervention, ultimately improving patient outcomes. However, it is critical to approach the integration of such models with caution, given their dependency on the quality and breadth of the data they are trained on, as well as their interpretability in clinical decision making. However, some limitations exist in the usage of creatinine serum level, as its levels are biased due to many factors, for example, age, gender, diet, and body mass index [10]. A common condition seen in advanced heart failure is muscle wasting, which shows a decrease in creatinine levels (with overestimation of GFR) [10]. However, to overcome their limits, several emerging glomerular and tubular biomarkers have been proposed over the last years, alongside imaging techniques that could complement the laboratory data exploring different pathophysiological pathways [10]. Both conventional HF risk factors and kidney-specific risk factors, such as anemia, acid/base imbalances, uremic toxins, bone mineral abnormalities, malnourishment, and myocardial stunning, are more common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [8]. Optimizing care for patients with HF and CKD hence requires a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach [4]. Clinical practice recommendations advocate the examination and treatment of iron-deficient anemia in this patient population since anemia is frequent in CKD and can independently increase the risk of hospitalization and mortality in persons with HF [4]. Early diagnosis and predictable prognosis help to systematically manage and discover new treatment methods [19]. Since conventional HF medications are underutilized in this population, more focused therapies may improve outcomes for individuals with renal disease [8]. It is important to acknowledge several limitations in this study. First, due to its observational design, this study could only establish associations rather than causation. Second, these associations may be influenced by various confounding variables. Third, this study’s limited follow-up period for assessing patient outcomes serves as an additional constraint.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study underscores the complex interplay between kidney function measures, various comorbidities, and clinical outcomes in heart failure patients in Jordan. These findings emphasize the critical role of kidney functions as a prognostic indicator and stress the need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to managing both cardiac and renal aspects of heart failure. Machine learning models, particularly the Random Forest Classifier, have provided substantial predictive insights, highlighting its potential as a clinical decision-support tool. The model’s notable accuracy and AUC reflect its capability to navigate multifaceted clinical data and effectively identify key prognostic variables. This analytical prowess points towards a future where machine learning can assist clinicians in tailoring interventions more precisely for the heart failure population with coexisting CKD, thus fostering the advancement of personalized patient care. Nevertheless, the path forward mandates further research to refine these models, enhance their interpretability, and validate their efficacy across a wider spectrum of patient populations. Continued efforts are vital to evolve and substantiate innovative heart failure treatments for individuals with chronic kidney disease, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes and quality of life. Despite the absence of baseline data for hemoglobin and nutritional evaluation scores in this study, the current analysis provides valuable insights into the relationships between kidney function measures and patient outcomes. Future research should include these scores to refine predictive models and offer a comprehensive understanding of anemia management and nutritional status in CKD and HF populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I. and H.A.-h.; Data curation, A.D. and B.A.-B.; Formal analysis, Y.B.A. and A.A.T.; Investigation, A.-L.M.S. and A.Z.; Methodology, R.A., R.I., and M.A.; Project administration, M.I.; Supervision, M.I., R.A. and H.A.-h.; Writing—original draft, A.-L.M.S., Y.B.A., and A.A.T.; Writing—review and editing, M.I. and R.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Specialty Hospital (approval number 5/1/T/104826), King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) (approval number No. 21 KHCC 112) and King Abdullah University Hospital (approval number 30/1/701). Ethical approval was issued in 30/03/2021 for all centers.

Informed Consent Statement

The IRB waived the need for direct informed consent from the patients as it included only variables that are routinely recorded from all patients presenting with heart failure.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yoo, B.S. Clinical Significance of B-type Natriuretic Peptide in Heart Failure. J. Lifestyle Med. 2014, 4, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bhagat, A.A.; Greene, S.J.; Vaduganathan, M.; Fonarow, G.C.; Butler, J. Initiation, Continuation, Switching, and Withdrawal of Heart Failure Medical Therapies During Hospitalization. JACC. Heart Fail. 2019, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beezer, J.; Al Hatrushi, M.; Husband, A.; Kurdi, A.; Forsyth, P. Polypharmacy definition and prevalence in heart failure: A systematic review. Heart Fail. Rev. 2022, 27, 465–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vijay, K.; Neuen, B.L.; Lerma, E.V. Heart Failure in Patients with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Challenges and Opportunities. Cardiorenal Med. 2022, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Polonsky, T.S.; Bakris, G.L. Heart Failure and Changes in Kidney Function: Focus on Understanding, Not Reacting. Heart Fail. Clin. 2019, 15, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018, 392, 1789–1858. [Google Scholar]
  7. Szlagor, M.; Dybiec, J.; Młynarska, E.; Rysz, J.; Franczyk, B. Chronic Kidney Disease as a Comorbidity in Heart Failure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tuegel, C.; Bansal, N. Heart failure in patients with kidney disease. Heart 2017, 103, 1848–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Matsushita, K.; Ballew, S.H.; Wang, A.Y.; Kalyesubula, R.; Schaeffner, E.; Agarwal, R. Epidemiology and risk of cardiovascular disease in populations with chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022, 18, 696–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Grande, D.; Gioia, M.I.; Terlizzese, P.; Iacoviello, M. Heart Failure and Kidney Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1067, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ronco, C.; Haapio, M.; House, A.A.; Anavekar, N.; Bellomo, R. Cardiorenal syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52, 1527–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schefold, J.C.; Filippatos, G.; Hasenfuss, G.; Anker, S.D.; von Haehling, S. Heart failure and kidney dysfunction: Epidemiology, mechanisms and management. Nature reviews. Nephrology 2016, 12, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ronco, C.; Bellasi, A.; Di Lullo, L. Cardiorenal Syndrome: An Overview. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2018, 25, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roehm, B.; McAdams, M.; Hedayati, S.S. Novel Biomarkers of Kidney Disease in Advanced Heart Failure: Beyond GFR and Proteinuria. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2022, 19, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nowak, C.; Ärnlöv, J. Kidney Disease Biomarkers Improve Heart Failure Risk Prediction in the General Population. Circ. Heart Fail. 2020, 13, e006904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tomasoni, D.; Adamo, M.; Lombardi, C.M.; Metra, M. Highlights in heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2019, 6, 1105–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Levey, A.S.; Titan, S.M.; Powe, N.R.; Coresh, J.; Inker, L.A. Kidney Disease, Race, and GFR Estimation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN 2020, 15, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Fonarow, G.C.; Abraham, W.T.; Albert, N.M.; Stough, W.G.; Gheorghiade, M.; Greenberg, B.H.; O’Connor, C.M.; Nunez, E.; Yancy, C.W.; Young, J.B. A smoker’s paradox in patients hospitalized for heart failure: Findings from OPTIMIZE-HF. Eur. Heart J. 2008, 29, 1983–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Han, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Z.; Adhikari, B.K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, J.; Wang, Y. Cardiac biomarkers of heart failure in chronic kidney disease. Clin. Chim. Acta; Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2020, 510, 298–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves for the evaluated models. The dashed line represents the chance level of discrimination. Each model’s AUC is noted, with the Random Forest Classifier and Logistic Regression outperforming the SVM and XGBoost models marginally.
Figure 1. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves for the evaluated models. The dashed line represents the chance level of discrimination. Each model’s AUC is noted, with the Random Forest Classifier and Logistic Regression outperforming the SVM and XGBoost models marginally.
Medicina 60 00831 g001
Figure 2. Permutation Feature Importance for the top-performing model, highlighting the mean decrease in model performance when each feature’s information is shuffled. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the permutation importance over multiple shuffles.
Figure 2. Permutation Feature Importance for the top-performing model, highlighting the mean decrease in model performance when each feature’s information is shuffled. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the permutation importance over multiple shuffles.
Medicina 60 00831 g002
Table 1. The association between GFR and patient characteristics.
Table 1. The association between GFR and patient characteristics.
Variable, n (%)Normal GFR mL/min/1.73 m2 (≥60) (n = 373 **)Low GFR mL/min/1.73 m2 (<60) (n = 277 **)p-Value
GenderMale251 (67.7)152 (55.7)0.002 *
Female120 (32.3)121 (44.3)
Age (years)<4022 (6.3)3 (1.2)<0.001 *
40–4930 (8.5)2 (0.8)
50–5976 (21.7)28 (11.2)
60–69106 (30.2)72 (28.9)
≥70117 (33.3)144 (57.8)
HypertensionYes263 (77.1)234 (89.3)<0.001 *
No78 (22.9)28 (10.7)
DiabetesNo118 (34.6)61 (23.3)0.003 *
Yes223 (65.4)201 (76.7)
SmokingNo199 (58.4)211 (80.5)<0.001 *
Yes142 (41.6)51 (19.5)
AlcoholNo334 (97.9)259 (98.9)0.387
Yes7 (2.1)3 (1.1)
Type of Heart FailureChronic276 (75.2)201 (73.1)0.544
Acute91 (24.8)74 (26.9)
DyslipidemiaNo121 (35.5)97 (37.0)0.697
Yes220 (34.5)165 (63.0)
ObesityNo303 (88.9)235 (89.7)0.742
Yes38 (11.1)27 (10.3)
Family History of Premature DeathNo306 (89.7)220 (84.0)0.035 *
Yes35 (10.3)42 (16.0)
Family History of ASCVDNo326 (95.6)156 (59.5)<0.001 *
Yes15 (4.4)106 (40.5)
History of ASCVDNo47 (16.3)40 (17.2)0.783
Yes242 (83.7)193 (82.8)
History of ArrhythmiasNo261 (76.1)157 (61.4)<0.001 *
Yes109 (23.9)118 (38.6)
History of Implanted DeviceNo283 (97.9)220 (94.4)0.034 *
Yes6 (2.1)13 (5.6)
History of Structural Heart Disease No271 (93.8)213 (91.4)0.303
Yes18 (6.2)20 (8.6)
History of HF No106 (28.6)65 (23.7)0.162
Yes264 (71.4)209 (76.3)
Admissions in Past 6 Months0206 (57.4)141 (51.6)0.474
167 (18.7)53 (19.4)
222 (6.1)15 (5.5)
>264 (17.8)64 (23.4)
Mechanical VentilationNo255 (97.3)207 (93.7)0.049 *
Yes7 (2.7)14 (6.3)
DeathNo351 (94.1)224 (80.9)<0.001 *
Yes22 (5.9)53 (19.1)
Abbreviations: GFR: Glomerular Filtration Rate; HF: Heart Failure; ASCVD: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Values in parentheses indicate the percentage of patients within that subgroup relative to the total group size for that variable. * Statistical significance was determined with a p-value ≤ 0.05. ** Totals for some variables may not amount to the total group size due to missing values.
Table 2. The association between BUN and patient characteristics.
Table 2. The association between BUN and patient characteristics.
Variable, n (%)Normal BUN mg/dL
(n = 437)
High BUN mg/dL (>20)
(n = 1362)
p-Value
GenderMale174 (39.8)594 (43.6)0.163
Female263 (60.2)768 (56.4)
Age (years)<4027 (6.3)38 (3.0)<0.001 *
40–4945 (10.5)72 (5.8)
50–5983 (19.3)178 (14.3)
60–69116 (27.0)326 (26.1)
≥70158(36.8)633 (50.8)
HypertensionNo86 (20.6)244 (19.0)0.459
Yes331 (79.4)1042 (81.0)
DiabetesNo135 (32.4)379 (29.4)0.243
Yes282 (67.6)912 (70.6)
SmokingNo248 (59.5)921 (71.6)<0.001 *
Yes169 (40.5)365 (28.4)
AlcoholNo412 (98.8)1281 (99.6)0.060
Yes5 (1.2)5 (0.4)
Type of HFChronic330 (75.3)896 (66.4)<0.001 *
Acute108 (24.7)454 (33.6)
DyslipidemiaNo119 (28.5)627 (48.8)<0.001 *
Yes298 (71.5)659 (51.2)
ObesityNo378 (90.6)1192 (92.7)0.177
Yes39 (9.4)94 (7.3)
Family History of Premature DeathNo365 (87.5)1259 (97.9)<0.001 *
Yes52 (12.5)27 (2.1)
Family History of ASCVDNo373 (89.4)903 (70.5)<0.001 *
Yes44 (10.6)380 (29.0)
History of ASCVDNo47 (13.5)218 (22.2)<0.001 *
Yes302 (86.5)766 (77.8)
History of ArrhythmiasNo267 (65.3)798 (67.4)0.329
Yes170 (34.7)567 (32.6)
History of Implanted DeviceNo334 (95.7)946 (96.1)0.720
Yes15 (4.3)38 (3.9)
History of Structural Heart Disease No329 (94.3)920 (39.5)0.609
Yes20 (5.7)64 (6.5)
History of HFNo69 (15.8)265 (19.3)0.098
Yes368 (84.2)1107 (80.7)
Admissions in Past 6 Months0166 (39.1)545 (41.1)0.031 *
190 (21.2)241 (18.2)
243 (10.1)93 (7.0)
>2126 (29.6)446 (33.6)
Mechanical VentilationNo227 (93.8)912 (95.3)0.340
Yes15 (6.2)45 (4.7)
DeathNo392 (89.3)1243 (90.0)0.667
Yes47 (10.7)138 (10.0)
Abbreviations: BUN: Blood Urea Nitrogen; HF: Heart Failure; ASCVD: Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. Values in parentheses indicate the percentage of patients within that subgroup relative to the total group size for that variable. * Statistical significance was determined with a p-value ≤ 0.05.
Table 3. The association between creatinine level and patient characteristics.
Table 3. The association between creatinine level and patient characteristics.
Variable, n (%)Normal Cr µmol/L
(n = 1113)
High Cr µmol/L (>115)
(n = 814)
p-Value
GenderMale463 (41.6)345 (42.4)0.730
Female650 (58.4)469 (57.6)
Age<4059 (5.8)11 (1.4)<0.001 *
40–4995 (9.3)32 (4.2)
50–59197 (19.3)87 (11.3)
60–69271 (36.5)194 (25.3)
≥70401 (39.2)443 (57.8)
HypertensionNo42 (23.7)111 (13.9)<0.001 *
Yes779 (76.3)688 (86.1)
DiabetesNo380 (37.1)175 (21.9)<0.001 *
Yes645 (62.9)625 (78.1)
SmokingNo645 (63.2)611 (76.5)<0.001 *
Yes376 (36.8)188 (23.5)
AlcoholNo1012 (99.1)797 (99.7)0.060
Yes9 (0.9)2 (0.3)
Type of HFChronic792 (72.1)538 (65.9)0.004 *
Acute307 (27.9)278 (34.1)
DyslipidemiaNo417 (40.8)371 (46.4)0.017 *
Yes604 (59.2)428 (53.6)
ObesityNo935 (91.6)738 (92.4)0.540
Yes86 (8.4)61 (7.6)
Family History of Premature DeathNo976 (95.6)753 (94.2)0.190
Yes45 (4.4)46 (5.8)
Family History of ASCVDNo979 (95.9)401 (50.2)<0.001 *
Yes42 (4.1)398 (49.8)
History of ASCVDNo164 (20.1)118 (18.8)0.519
Yes650 (79.9)510 (81.2)
History of ArrhythmiasNo695 (62.7)465 (56.6)0.007 *
Yes414 (37.3)357 (43.3)
History of Implanted DeviceNo781 (95.9)605 (96.3)0.703
Yes33 (4.1)23 (3.7)
History of Structural Heart Disease No761 (93.5)587 (93.5)0.989
Yes53 (6.5)41 (6.5)
History of HFNo227 (20.5)131 (15.9)0.011 *
Yes882 (79.5)692 (84.1)
Admissions in Past 6 Months0457 (42.8)324 (40.0)0.368
1195 (18.2)159 (19.7)
284 (7.9)62 (7.7)
>2333 (31.1)264 (32.6)
Mechanical VentilationNo648 (96.6)559 (93.3)0.008 *
Yes23 (3.4)40 (6.7)
DeathNo1064 (95.0)688 (83.0)<0.001 *
Yes56 (5.0)141 (17.0)
Abbreviations: Cr: creatinine; HF: heart failure; ASCVD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Values in parentheses indicate the percentage of patients within that subgroup relative to the total group size for that variable. * Statistical significance was determined with a p-value ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Performance metrics of the used algorithms for death prediction.
Table 4. Performance metrics of the used algorithms for death prediction.
ModelAccuracyAUCSensitivitySpecificity
Random Forest Classifier90.02%80.51%32.56%96.39%
Logistic Regression73.78%79.15%72.09%73.97%
Support Vector Machine80.74%73.65%46.51%84.54%
eXtreme Gradient Boosting90.02%78.21%39.53%95.62%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Izraiq, M.; Alawaisheh, R.; Ibdah, R.; Dabbas, A.; Ahmed, Y.B.; Mughrabi Sabbagh, A.-L.; Zuraik, A.; Ababneh, M.; Toubasi, A.A.; Al-Bkoor, B.; et al. Machine Learning-Based Mortality Prediction in Chronic Kidney Disease among Heart Failure Patients: Insights and Outcomes from the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry. Medicina 2024, 60, 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050831

AMA Style

Izraiq M, Alawaisheh R, Ibdah R, Dabbas A, Ahmed YB, Mughrabi Sabbagh A-L, Zuraik A, Ababneh M, Toubasi AA, Al-Bkoor B, et al. Machine Learning-Based Mortality Prediction in Chronic Kidney Disease among Heart Failure Patients: Insights and Outcomes from the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry. Medicina. 2024; 60(5):831. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Izraiq, Mahmoud, Raed Alawaisheh, Rasheed Ibdah, Aya Dabbas, Yaman B. Ahmed, Abdel-Latif Mughrabi Sabbagh, Ahmad Zuraik, Muhannad Ababneh, Ahmad A. Toubasi, Basel Al-Bkoor, and et al. 2024. "Machine Learning-Based Mortality Prediction in Chronic Kidney Disease among Heart Failure Patients: Insights and Outcomes from the Jordanian Heart Failure Registry" Medicina 60, no. 5: 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60050831

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop