Next Article in Journal
An Improved MOEA/D Algorithm for the Solution of the Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problem
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Production of Clean Fermentable Sugars by Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Saccharification of Sugarcane Bagasse
Previous Article in Journal
Exopolysaccharides of Fungal Origin: Properties and Pharmaceutical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Biobased Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Olive Mill Solid Waste by Optimization of pH and Substrate to Inoculum Ratio

by
Yasmim A. da Fonseca
1,
Adonai B. de Camargos
1,
Gustavo S. M. Gomes
1,
P. Fregulia
2,
Silvana Q. Silva
3,
Leandro V. A. Gurgel
1,* and
Bruno E. L. Baêta
1,*
1
Environmental and Chemical Technology Group, Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário Morro do Cruzeiro, Bauxita, s/n, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil
2
U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (ARS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1925 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
3
Department of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Campus Universitário, Morro do Cruzeiro, Bauxita, s/n, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(2), 338; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020338
Submission received: 10 December 2022 / Revised: 13 January 2023 / Accepted: 16 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Process Design and Development of Biorefinery)

Abstract

:
The pH and substrate-to-inoculum ratio (S/I) are important parameters in the anaerobic fermentation of agroindustrial residues, and therefore the optimization of these two parameters is needed for a stable, efficient, and sustainable reactor operation. In this work, the parameters pH (5–9) and S/I (0.5–3 gVS gVS−1) were optimized to produce biobased volatile fatty acids (VFAs) from hydrothermally pretreated olive mill solid waste (HPOMSW). The response variables evaluated in the Doehlert design were total VFAs concentration (tVFAs) (mg L−1) and amounts (%) of isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric, and valeric acids on the VFAs profile. The pH was the variable that most influenced the mixed culture fermentation of HPOMSW, proving to be a key parameter in the process. Microbial community analyses of conditions 1 (S/I = 3 gVS gVS−1 and pH = 7) and 4 (S/I = 1.13 gVS gVS−1 and pH = 5) showed that Proteobacteria and Firmicutes accounted for more than 87% of the total microorganisms identified for both conditions. In addition, the second-order model best fitted the experimental data for the VFAs production at the desirable condition (S/I = 3 gVS gVS−1 and pH = 8).

1. Introduction

The increased global demand for energy and food, global warming and dependence on fossil fuels have shifted the linear economy towards a biobased circular economy. This model is the pillar of future global economic development, providing circularity, sustainability, and progress [1]. Among the value-added products that can be obtained in a biorefinery, volatile fatty acids (VFAs) produced by anaerobic digestion are highlighted for their universality and versatility of applications, which include food (flavorings, pH regulators, additives, and preservatives), pharmaceutical (production of perfumes and moisturizing agents), and chemical (synthesis of polymers and solvents) industries [2,3]. In another application, VFAs can also be used for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates or polyhydroxybutyrates, biobased polymers that have shown important material properties such as biocompatibility and thermoplasticity [4].
Currently, VFAs are produced from fossil fuels. Acetic acid, for example, is produced through the carbonylation of methanol, while propionic acid is synthesized by the hydrocarboxylation of ethylene in the presence of a catalyst such as nickel carbonyl or rhodium. In another route of oxo synthesis, butyric acid has been produced by the oxidation of butyraldehyde. Although well-established, these chemical routes have some drawbacks, such as low efficiency and the use of expensive catalysts [5]. Moreover, dependence on fossil resources encourages the search for alternative and sustainable biochemical processes for the production of VFAs [2].
Carboxylic acids can be produced from renewable raw materials through microbial fermentation, as these acids are the end products of various fermentation routes. An alternative to reduce carbon source costs in acidogenic fermentation processes is the use of lignocellulosic residues as substrates. This scenario benefits from the use of renewable raw materials and the possibility of adding greater value to them, besides mitigating the environmental problems generated by the inadequate disposal of waste materials [6].
Among the agroindustrial residues studied as substrates to produce VFAs, the olive mill solid waste (OMSW) produced during the extraction of olive oil is a renewable and promising biomass, considering its availability and potential for application in circular production chains. The OMSW is a problematic residue due to high organic matter concentration that includes polyphenols and lipids, transforming them into phytotoxic materials with negative effects on soil microbiota and aquatic ecosystems [7]. Although many studies aiming to add value to OMSW through bioproducts obtained by producing other compounds from alternative and sustainable processes, such as phenolic compounds, ethanol, furfurals, and coals, among others [8,9,10], have been published, its potential for VFAs production is still little exploited, with few studies available in the literature [11,12].
In our previous work [13], the hydrothermal pretreatment of OMSW for VFAs production was investigated for different anaerobic digestion systems. The evaluation of the effect of hydrothermal pretreatment severity and typology of anaerobic digestion (AD) in liquid (L-AD), semi-solid (Ss-AD), and solid phase (S-AD) was important to understand the performance of fermentative systems concerning the profile of VFAs produced. However, to make the VFAs platform from OMSW more attractive and consolidated in the future, the optimization of anaerobic digestion parameters is essential to achieve greater process efficiency.
In this way, this work aimed to optimize the pH and substrate-to-inoculum ratio (S/I) to produce volatile fatty acids from the anaerobic digestion of OMSW using a mixed culture of anaerobic bacteria. In addition to pH, S/I is recognized as one of the main parameters affecting the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic residues [14]. Besides the effects on microbial communities, metabolic pathways, and kinetic parameters (biodegradation rate and lag time), the concentration of microorganisms is very important for the start-up of anaerobic reactors and also for the stability of anaerobic digestion systems [15]. It has been reported that a high S/I ratio can be toxic to bacteria, while a very low S/I ratio can prevent the induction of enzymes necessary for biodegradation [16].
The novelty of this work lies in the optimization of the anaerobic digestion of hydrothermally pretreated OMSW to produce VFAs. As the production of VFAs from agroindustrial residues is still incipient when it comes to industrial plants, the optimization of process parameters is essential for designing a process that is more likely to be competitive and scalable. In addition to process optimization, this work provides important information to clarify the OMSW fermentation from a mixed culture, such as the analysis of the microbial community and its metabolic pathways and the kinetic study of the fermentative process.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Chromatography grade sulfuric acid (99.999%) and chromatography standards (acetic acid, formic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, and isovaleric acid) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium bicarbonate and hydrochloric acid (36–37 wt.% in H2O) were bought from Synth (Brazil). Nitrocellulose membranes were acquired from Unifil (Brazil).

2.2. Hydrothermally Pretreated Olive Mill Solid Waste

The raw olive mill solid waste (OMSW) collected in the 2018/2019 harvest was kindly provided by the “Serra que Chora” olive oil mill (Barbacena, MG, Brazil). Prior to its use, OMSW was stored under freezing conditions (<0 °C) to avoid undesirable fermentation processes. Hydrothermal liquefaction of OMSW was performed at 162 °C and 61 min. This reaction condition was described by Fonseca et al. [13] as the most suitable condition to produce VFAs from OMSW. The heating of the reactor was carried out by a thermostatically controlled 25 L glycerol bath (Marconi®, model MA 159). At the end of the reaction, the 470 cm3 stainless steel reactor vessel (8 cm O.D. × 6 cm I.D. × 16.6 cm H) was rapidly cooled in an ice bath, and the reactor content was collected at room temperature. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) and pH, as well as total and volatile solids (TS and VS) of the pretreated material, were determined according to Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater [17].

2.3. Statistical Analysis: Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

A Doehlert experimental design (DED) was used to determine the influence of fermentation conditions on VFAs production from hydrothermally pretreated OMSW. The DED matrix was composed of 9 unique experiments with replicates at the center point, as shown in Table 1.
The independent variables evaluated were S/I (0.5–3 gVS gVS−1) (X1) and pH (5–9) (X2). The response variables chosen for the statistical analyses were the tVFAs (Y1, mg L−1), i.e., the sum of the concentrations of formic, acetic, propionic, butyric, valeric, and isovaleric acids on the 15th day of fermentation; and the amount of C4 and C5 fatty acids (isobutyric, butyric, isovaleric, and valeric acids) (Y2, %). The variable Y2 represents the ratio of C4 and C5 acids in the tVFAs profile and was calculated according to Equation (1):
Y 2   /   ( % ) = [ ( isobutyric   acid +   butyric   acid +   isovaleric   acid +   valeric   acid )   ( mg   L 1 ) ( formic   acid + acetic   acid +   propionic   acid + isobutyric   acid +   butyric   acid +   isovaleric   acid +   valeric   acid )   ( mg   L 1 ) ] × 100
The choice of the second variable is due to the higher market value of acids with four or more carbon atoms [2]. Experimental results were evaluated with the Statistica 12.0 (StatSoft, Inc.) routines for regression coefficients and graphical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed at a 95% confidence level and according to the pure error.
The second-degree polynomial equation used to model the experimental data obtained from the DED is shown in Equation (2). The most complex model, including interactions between the independent variables, was used to model the responses as follows:
Y = b0 + b1 X1 + b2 X2 + b11 (X1)2 + b22 (X2)2 + b12 X1 X2
where Y is the response variable, X1 and X2 are the independent variables S/I and pH, respectively; b0 is the model constant, b1 and b2 are the estimated linear regression coefficients, b11 and b22 are the estimated quadratic regression coefficients, and b12 is the interaction coefficient.
The desirability function approach was used to optimize multiple responses simultaneously. In this approach, each response is converted into individual desirability values (di) ranging from 0 to 1 (lowest to highest). Then, multivariate numerical optimization was performed to identify the combination of factors that maximizes the overall desirability of the process, calculated according to Equation (3) [18]:
D = ( d 1   d 2     d 3   d k ) 1 / k
The scores (s) were set at 1.0 (highest value) for responses Y1 and Y2 since the desirable condition is the one with the highest production of total VFAs and a higher amount of longer-chain VFAs. The factor grid was set at 40 interactions (Statistica 12.0).

2.4. Batch Fermentation Experiments

Batch fermentation experiments were performed in duplicate using glass bottle reactors with 60 mL working volume. The bottles were loaded with 12 wt% total solids (TS). Thus, inoculum and OMSW were fed in sufficient amounts to satisfy the TS content and the S/I ratio of each experimental condition (Table 1). The inoculum used in the tests consisted of a mixture of anaerobic sludge (AS) and fresh bovine manure (FBM) in the proportion of 1 g VSAS: 1 g VSFBM, as defined by Lima et al. [19]. The FBM was collected from local farms (Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil), and the anaerobic sludge was collected from a pilot-scale mesophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB) fed with sewage at the Centre for Research and Training in Sanitation (CePTS) (UFMG/Copasa, Arrudas Wastewater Treatment Plant, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil). A thermal treatment using an autoclave (Prismatec®,Itu, SP, Brazil, model CS 50) at 100 °C for 120 min was used to enrich the inoculum with spore-forming VFA-producing microorganisms and eliminate some VFA consumers, such as methanogenic archaea from the microbial consortium [20].
A micronutrient solution was added to each bottle, according to Fonseca et al. [13]. NaHCO3 was also added to provide an alkalinity of 2.5 g L−1 as CaCO3 in order to avoid a sudden drop in pH [21]. The initial pH of the anaerobic reactors was measured with a pH meter (Meta® Química, Jaraguá do Sul, SC, Brazil, model Meta 210) and adjusted by adding drops of 1 mol L−1 NaOH or 1 mol L−1 HCl aqueous solutions. After adjusting the pH, all bottles were sealed and purged with N2 for 3 min at a flow rate of 109.3 mL min−1 to ensure anaerobic conditions. The reactors were placed in a thermostatic orbital shaker at 35 ± 1 °C (mesophilic condition) and stirred at 150 rpm for 15 days. At the end of the tests, liquid samples were collected from the reactors, centrifuged for 30 min at 14,000 rpm (relative centrifugal force of 12,709× g) (Eppendorf®, Hauppauge, NY, USA), model 5410), and filtered on nitrocellulose membranes (0.22 µm). The VFAs were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), as described in Section 2.5.

2.5. Volatile Fatty Acids Quantification

The VFAs (formic, acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, valeric, and isovaleric acids) were quantified using a Shimadzu® HPLC system (Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a pre-column (Cation H Refill Cartridge Microguard column, Bio-Rad®) and an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad®) kept at 55 °C. Aqueous sulfuric acid (5 mmol L−1) solution was used as eluent at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1. The detection of organic acids was performed by a UV-Vis detector (Shimadzu®, model SPD-10AV) at a wavelength of 210 nm.

2.6. Microbial Community Analysis

Microbial community analysis was performed by Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies, Inc. (Florianópolis, SC, Brazil). The libraries were prepared and paired sequenced (2 × 300 bp) on the Miseq sequencing platform (Miseq®, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The sludge was collected on the 15th day of fermentation. Samples were washed with phosphate buffer solution (pH = 7.2 ± 0.2) and centrifuged for 5 min at 3500 rpm. Subsequently, the samples were stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction [22]. The genetic material was extracted from one gram of the biomass sample using the DNeasy PowerSoil (QIAGEN®) kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in triplicate using Platinum Taq (Invitrogen, USA) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, 25 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for the 30s and 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension of 72 °C for 2 min for PCR 1 in the conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, 10 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 66 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension of 72 °C for 2 min for PCR 2 [23]. The final PCR reaction was cleaned up using AMPureXP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and samples were pooled into sequencing libraries for quantification using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit for Illumina platforms (KAPA Biosystems®, Wilmington, MA, USA). After sequencing, the bioinformatics pipeline performed sequence demultiplexing, adaptor, and primer trimming, as described by Christoff [23]. The sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) considering at least 99% identity in the reference 16S rRNA database (NeoRefdb, Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil).
Metabolic pathways were estimated from the 16S rRNA using the tool Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) version 2.0.0 [24]. PICRUSt is an alternative to previous expensive and complex metatranscriptomic analyses and is useful for predicting the functional composition of bacterial communities from 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data. The prediction of MetaCyc pathways is based on marker gene data and a database of reference genomes, such as the Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases [24,25].

2.7. Kinetics of VFAs Production

The optimized condition (S/I = 3 gVS gVS−1; pH = 8) was validated by upscaling the process to 500 mL glass bottle reactors (Schott Duran®, model GL 45, Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany). Thus, the same protocol described in Section 2.4 was maintained, but proportional amounts were added to the working volume (250 mL). To assess the change in the concentration and profile of VFAs over time, 1 mL aliquots were collected daily for analysis of organic acids, as described in Section 2.5. The experimental data for VFAs production were fitted according to different kinetic models (First-order, Second-order, Fitzhugh, Monomolecular, Modified Gompertz, Logistic, Transference, and Richards), as described in Table 2. The Matlab® R2016b (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) software was employed to fit the models to the experimental data using the Least Squares Method (LSM) through the function fminsearch.
The selection of the model that best described the VFAs production was based on the following functions: coefficient of determination ( R 2 ); adjusted coefficient of determination ( R a 2 ); Root Mean Square Error ( R M S E ); Normalized Root Mean Square Error ( N R M S E ), and Akaike Information Criterion ( A I C ) [27,28].
The R 2 value was calculated using Equation (4).
R 2 = 1 i   ( Y i , exp Y i , est ) 2   i ( Y i , exp Y ¯ ) 2
where Y i , exp is the observed data point, Y i , est is the data point predicted by the model, and Y ¯ is the mean of the observed data.
The R a 2 value was calculated using Equation (5).
R a 2 = 1 ( 1 R 2 ) ( N 1 ) N k 1
where N is the number of experimental data points (observations), and k is the number of model parameters (variables).
The R M S E value was calculated using Equation (6).
R M S E = i   ( Y i , exp Y i , est ) 2 N
The NRMSE value was calculated using Equation (7).
N R M S E = [ R M S E ( Y max Y min ) ] × 100
where Y max and Y min are the maximum and minimum observed values for the VFAs production.
The AIC value was calculated using Equation (8).
A I C = N   ln ( S S N ) + 2 k  
where SS is the squared sum of residuals.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fermentation Assays

The optimization of the independent variables pH and S/I ratio in the acidogenic fermentation of hydrothermally pretreated OMSW (162 °C; 62 min) in a semi-solid phase (12 wt% TS) aimed to understand the effects of these parameters on the production of VFAs from this pretreated biomass. The pretreated slurry presented the following physicochemical characteristics: pH = 4.84, total solids = 0.22 g gOMSW−1, volatile solids = 0.21 g gOMSW−1, and COD = 1.64 gO2 gOMSW−1. The full characterization of the pretreated OMSW can be found in the study by Fonseca et al. [13].
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the dependent variables evaluated in the Doehlert experimental design is shown in Table 3. The adjusted model showed R2 values higher than 0.97. This means that the adjusted regression model was able to explain more than 97% of the variability in the experimental data. Furthermore, the quadratic models showed a significant regression (pregression < 0.05) without lack of fit (p > 0.05).
As the second-order polynomial equations fitted well to the experimental data, the mathematical models in terms of coded factors are described in the following Equations (9) and (10):
Y1/(mg L1) = 7334.6 + 1836.7 (S/I) + 2741.8 (pH) − 448.6 (S/I)2 + 95.06 (pH)2 + 290.8 (S/I) (pH)
Y2/(%) = 29.5 − 2.6 (S/I) + 2.9 (pH) + 2.3 (S/I)2 − 16.8 (pH)2 + 4.4 (S/I) (pH)
The response surfaces for the response variables tVFAs concentration and C4 and C5 VFAs are shown in Figure 1. The total concentration of VFAs is an important variable for the industrial production of biobased VFAs since low concentrations can be an economic challenge for the recovery of these acids by separation techniques such as adsorption and membrane separation [29,30]. As can be seen in Figure 1a, higher tVFAs concentration can be achieved by using a S/I ratio higher than 2 gVS gVS−1 and pH higher than 8.
The linear terms of pH and S/I ratio had a significant positive effect on the variable concentration of tVFAs (Y1), as shown in the Pareto chart of standardized effects (Figure 1). In addition, pH has a greater influence on VFAs concentration as it has a greater effect (ef = 7.60) on the response Y1 when compared to the S/I ratio (ef = 4.41).
The analysis of the experimental conditions confirms a greater influence of pH, compared to the S/I ratio, on the total production of VFAs from OMSW. Conditions 1 (S/I = 3 and pH = 7) and 3 (S/I = 0.5 and pH = 7), both at pH 7, showed that a six-fold increase in the S/I ratio led to an increase of 58% in the concentration of VFAs. On the other hand, experimental conditions 4 (S/I = 1.13 and pH = 5) and 6 (S/I = 1.13 and pH = 9), both at an S/I ratio of 1.13 gSV gSV1, showed that increasing the pH from 5 to 9 resulted in a 144% increase in tVFAs concentration in the system.
Some authors who focused on the production of organic acids applied a pH of around 5.5 to reduce the influence of archaea [6,10]. However, recent studies focused on the production of VFAs from agroindustrial residues have reported that an alkaline medium may favor the accumulation of VFAs, as shown in this work [31,32].
A reason for the low performance of fermentative processes at acidic pH is that when the pH of the system is below the pKa of carboxylic acids (from 4.76 to 4.88), these species are protonated and can easily penetrate the bacterial cell through passive diffusion, dissociating in the cytosol. Therefore, the accumulation of carboxylates in bacterial cells can reach concentrations that are toxic to microorganisms, due to mechanisms such as membrane rupture and enzymatic inhibition [6,33].
In addition to the effects of pH on the enzymatic and metabolic activities of microorganisms, the effect of this parameter on the solubility and hydrolysis of substrates may explain the lower total concentration of VFAs at acidic pH. According to Dahiya et al. [32], compared to an acidic medium, an alkaline medium favors the hydrolysis of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids by causing the ionization of the acidic groups, thereby facilitating the availability of readily available soluble substrates for microorganisms.
Some authors using different substrates, such as granular sludge and food residues, concluded that the highest concentrations of carboxylic acids were favored by alkalinity [12,21,34,35]. Regarding OMSW, Cabrera et al., 2019 studied the accumulation of VFAs in methanogenic systems at different pH values (5.7 and 9) and reported that the highest accumulation of VFAs (3.69 gDQOVFA L1) was reached at pH 9, where the profile of generated acids was mainly represented by acetic acid (79.3%).
As well as concentration, the profile of VFAs plays a significant role in their subsequent application and therefore deserves attention. Long-chain carboxylic acids have a higher market price and can still facilitate further recovery for hydrophobicity-based techniques [2,36]. The linear (pH) and quadratic (pH2) terms of pH showed statistical significance in the variable response C4 and C5 VFAs. However, as observed in the Pareto chart of standardized effects (Figure 2), the linear term (pH) had a positive effect (ef = 4.51), while the quadratic term (pH2) had a negative effect (ef = −18.9) on the dependent variable Y2.
For the experimental pH range evaluated (5–9), pH values close to the extreme pH range (~5, ~9) promoted a decrease in the amount of C4 and C5 VFAs. Therefore, as can be seen in Figure 1, the most suitable conditions to obtain a profile with a higher amount of C4 and C5 VFAs are those with pH between 6 and 8 and extreme S/I ratio conditions (~0, 5, ~3 gSV gSV1). Even though neutral pH favors the production of VFAs, this range is also optimum for acetolactic methanogens, which can lead to a reduction in the accumulation of VFAs. [32]. It is worth mentioning that in the present study, the methane composition in the gas fraction was <5 % in all conditions, showing that the thermal pretreatment of the inoculum was efficient for the suppression of methanogenic activity.

3.2. VFAs Composition

The production profile of VFAs for all conditions studied is shown in Figure 3. The experimental conditions 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (pH = 7 and pH = 9) presented a more diversified profile regarding the variety of acids produced when compared to conditions 4 and 5 (pH = 5). When considering the influence of pH on the system, the VFAs profile obtained under experimental conditions 2 and 5 (2.4 gVS gVS1) and 4 and 6 (1.13 gVS gVS−1) suggests that increasing the pH from 5 to 9 is related to a higher amount of isobutyric acid.
When considering the influence of the S/I ratio on the acid profile of the system, it can be inferred that this parameter did not influence at pH 5 since the profile of VFAs under conditions 4 (S/I = 2.4 gSV gSV1 and pH = 5) and 5 (S/I = 1.13 gSV gSV1 and pH = 5) were similar and had no significant changes in the amount of isobutyric acid (p > 0.05 by the Tuckey test). On the other hand, the S/I ratio proved to be important at pH 9, considering that the comparison of conditions 2 and 6 showed a decrease in the amount of propionic acid when the S/I ratio increased from 1.13 to 2.4 gVS gVS1.
The fermented stream of organic acids as they come out of the process is of little value. However, if VFAs can be concentrated and recovered individually or if the concentrated mixture of acids can be converted into a final product that can be easily separated from the liquid phase, an attractive biorefinery can be developed [37]. In this way, the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), biopolymers that can be used as substitutes for petroleum-derived plastics, is one of the potential applications of VFAs, whose profile strongly affects the type of PHA that is produced in the next step [34].
The odd-to-even ratio is defined as the sum of the odd-equivalent carboxylic acids produced (propionic and valeric acids) divided by the sum of the even-equivalent carboxylic acids produced (acetic, isobutyric, butyric, and isovaleric acids [21]. This parameter is used to assess the potential of an acidified stream to produce 3-hydroxybutyrate or 3-hydroxyvalerate. In general, an even acid tends to produce 3-hydroxybutyrate, while an odd acid tends to produce 3-hydroxyvalerate [38].
The odd-to-even ratio of all experimental conditions tested is shown in Figure 3b. Among experimental assays, condition 6 (S/I = 1.13 gSV gSV−1 and pH = 9) presented the highest proportion of acids containing an odd number of carbons in the chain. This is because higher pH ranges favored propionic acid production and therefore increased the odd-to-even VFA ratio. Propionic and valeric acids are odd acids, and their formation favors the potential valorization and consequent conversion of OMSW into polyhydroxyalkanoates [39]. Thus, it would be expected that in technological routes to produce PHAs, the profile of VFAs obtained at pH 9, and low S/I ratio would favor the production of hydroxyvalerate (HV).
The pH had a greater influence on the acidogenic fermentation of OMSW for the response variables evaluated (tVFAs concentration and amount of C4 and C5 VFAs), proving to be a key parameter in the process. By studying the parameters influencing the production of VFAs using wastewater obtained from olive oil production to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates, Gameiro et al. [40] reported the same trend observed in the present study, i.e., alkalinity was the most important parameter for the production of VFAs from olive mill solid waste, showing a greater effect on acidification when compared to the S/I ratio applied to the system under study.

3.3. Microbial Community

The bioprocess parameters have a great influence on the selection of the microbial community active in the process. Understanding these effects in a mixed microbial community is very important to clarify the bacteria involved in the fermentation for a more robust and efficient bioprocess. The microbial analysis was performed for conditions 1 (S/I = 3 gSV gSV1, pH = 7) and 4 (S/I = 1.13 gSV gSV1, pH = 5), as shown in Figure 4.
Experimental condition 1 (SI = 3 gVS gVS1, pH = 7) was chosen because it was the most similar to the desirable condition (SI = 3 gVS gVS1, pH = 8) among the experimental conditions evaluated. On the other hand, condition 4 had the worst performance for the total concentration of tVFAs (3623.6 mg L1), as well as a low amount of C4 and C5 VFAs (11.9%). Therefore, this condition was chosen to compare the microbial community in reactors with different performances to produce precursors for the biosynthesis of longer chain-length VFAs.
The sequences of the bacterial community were assigned to 6 phyla, 14 classes, and 60 genera for condition 1 and 8 phyla, 18 classes, and 129 genera for condition 14. As shown in Figure 4a, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were the dominant phyla in the reactors, together representing over 87% of the microbial community for both conditions. Firmicutes have a thick cell wall, and their ability to produce endospores makes them able to survive in extreme conditions [25]. Also, this taxon is closely involved in the hydrolysis of complex organic matter by producing proteases, cellulases, lipases, and other extracellular enzymes [21]. However, in this study, the dominance of Firmicutes phylum observed for condition 4 was not related to the high production of VFAs reported for this reactor. Therefore, it seems that members of Proteobacteria phylum, which prevailed in condition 1, may be responsible for the amount and composition of VFA production.
The relative abundance of the most representative genera identified in conditions 1 (SI = 3 gVS gVS1, pH = 7) and 4 (S/I = 3 gSV gSV1, pH = 7) is shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen that in such conditions, the microbial community is less diverse compared to condition 4 and is dominated by members of the Escherichia genus (66.6%), followed by Clostridium sp. (19.0%). On the other hand, Clostridium (40.3%), Sporanaerobacter (11.2%), Lactobacillus (5.1%), and Peptoclostridium (7.1%) species, among others, were detected in condition 4.
According to the microbial results, the experimental conditions used in condition 1 (S/I = 3 gVS gVS1, pH = 7) favored the Escherichia genus over the others. It is noteworthy that condition 1 promoted a high concentration of tVFAs and a high amount of C4 and C5 VFAs. Thus, the genus Escherichia may be associated with the positive results obtained in this condition. According to Wilks et al. [40], species of the genus Escherichia, such as Escherichia coli, can grow in a pH range of 4.5–9, over which bacteria preserve enzymatic activity, as well as protein and nucleic acid stability, maintaining the cytoplasmic pH in the pH range of 7.2–7.8 [41].
In condition 1, butyric acid corresponded to 18.4% of the VFAs production profile. Considering that butyric acid was not detected in condition 4, this suggests a correlation between the genus Escherichia and the production of butyrate. In fact, Escherichia species are well known to perform mixed acid fermentation and can simultaneously generate acetate, butyrate, succinate, lactate, and formate during their metabolism. Several studies in the literature have studied engineered E. coli to exclusively produce butyrate by excluding major NADH-dependent oxidation/reduction processes, re-hypothesizing the metabolic pathway for butyryl-CoA, and overexpressing the fermentation genes as a requirement to remove acetate synthesis pathways and transform butyryl-CoA to butyrate [6].
The genus Clostridium, which accounted for 19.0% and 35.9% in conditions 1 and 4, respectively, is recognized for its hydrolytic function, accelerating the hydrolysis of polysaccharides for further fermentation of sugar in acids and solvents. Therefore, Clostridium species may be involved in the substrate availability for all fermentative bacteria. In condition 4, where Clostridium species dominated, acetic and isobutyric acids accumulated in the reactor; however, their concentrations were lower in comparison to condition 1. In the literature, Clostridium has been identified as playing an important role in the production of VFAs in anaerobic systems using lignocellulosic residues as substrates. For instance, Adarme et al. [22] identified that Clostridium corresponded to 63% of the bacterial community present in an acidogenic reactor using vinasse, hemicelluloses hydrolysate (HH), yeast extract (YE), and sugarcane bagasse fly ash (SBFA) as substrates. In another study, Clostridium was the dominant bacteria genus in the digestion of swine manure under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions (SM), with relative abundances of 44.8% and 42.7%, respectively [42]. Moreover, C. butyricum is known to be one of the most important producers of butyric acid due to its high productivity and relatively greater stability, and it has been used in bioaugmented experiments to enhance butyric acid production [43].
Aiming to further explore the mechanisms underlying the VFAs production from pretreated OMSW, PICRUSt analysis based on 16S rRNA of the identified genera was used. In this way, a total of 6230 MetaCyc pathways were predicted, and the twenty main pathways for conditions 1 and 4 are shown in Figure 5. Metabolic pathways included signaling and cellular processes (C1 = 51% and C4 = 60%), genetic information processing (C1 = 25% and C4 = 21%), and metabolism (C1 = 17% and C4 = 14%).
Signaling and cellular processes accounted for the highest proportion in conditions 1 and 4 (Figure 5). Although these conditions (1 and 4) presented different concentrations and profiles of VFAs after fermentation, 70% of the top twenty functional pathways were the same. The substrate composition also played an important role in mixed culture fermentation. As raw olive pomace is composed of lipids (16.81%) and carbohydrates (21.73%) [13], enzymes such as sucrose-6-phosphatase [EC:3.1.3.24], sucrose-6-phosphatase [EC:3.1.3.24], transketolase [EC:2.2.1.1], formate C-acetyltransferase [EC:2.3.1.54], and 3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier protein] reductase [EC:1.1.1.100] might be related to the conversions of these molecules. In addition to these enzymes, other gene expressions linked to the metabolism of substrates (e.g., glucokinase and 6-posphofructokinase) and biosynthesis of VFAs (e.g., butyrate kinase, acetate kinase, pyruvate kinase) were predicted in the analysis [44].
The main benefit of PICRUSt is its evolutionary models that infer functions for the complete bacterial community. However, some drawbacks, such as focusing only on the 16S rDNA marker and using only Greengenes taxonomy, are reported in the literature [45]. Despite these limitations, when PICRUSt is used properly, it is a reliable tool that has been widely used to predict the functional genes involved in the microbial community of acidogenic fermenters for the production of carboxylic acids [44,46,47,48].

3.4. Simultaneous Optimization and Kinetic Studies

Aiming to achieve better production of VFAs from OMSW, with high concentrations of carboxylic acids and a high amount of longer chain VFAs, the desirability function was used to verify which combination of pH and S/I ratio would be best suited to provide this scenario. The variables Y1 and Y2 were set to fully desirable levels (s = 1). The response of the desirability function indicated that the best scenario to produce VFAs from OMSW is S/I = 3 gVS gVS1 and pH = 8. The global desirability function value was 0.79. Since this value can vary from 0 to 1 and the closer this value is to unity, the better the simultaneous optimization, the statistical tool was successfully implemented for the proposed objective [18].
Kinetic analysis and data modeling of carboxylic acid production were carried out for the desirable condition (S/I = 3 gVS gVS1, pH = 8). The kinetic parameters estimated by fitting the First-order, Second-order, Fitzhugh, Monomolecular, Modified Gompertz, Logistic, Transference, and Richards models to the experimental data are shown in Table 4.
The R2 values estimated by kinetic models ranged from 0.77 to 0.89. As the production of carboxylic acids by mixed culture is a complex bioprocess involving many metabolic pathways, these results are considered satisfactory. Morais et al., 2020 modeled the carboxylic acid production from swine wastewater, and except for the Richards model, they reported R2 values ranging from 0.73 to 0.87.
The production of VFAs from hydrothermally pretreated olive mill solid wastes in mixed culture was best described by exponential growth models, as evidenced by the higher R2 values and lower AIC values, such as for the First-order model (R2 = 0.81 and AIC = 41.56), the Second-order model (R2 = 0.89 and AIC = 30.31), and the Monomolecular model (R2 = 0.81 and AIC = 43.56) compared to Logistic growth kinetics, such as for the Richards model (R2 = 0.77 and AIC = 48.94) and the Logistic model (R2 = 0.78 and AIC = 46.77).
In exponential models, the production of VFAs increased until a maximum concentration was reached. As shown in Figure 6, the maximum concentration of VFAs was reached on the eighth day of the experiment. In addition, the amount of acetic acid decreased, and a profile with a higher amount of butyric acid (25.5–36.2%) and propionic acid (5.3–11.1%) was observed until the 12th day of the test. One of the hypotheses for the reduction in acetic acid concentration and the increase in propionic and butyric acid concentration over the days is the metabolic shift of the bacteria in response to the accumulation of acetic acid in the reactor. Therefore, a shift in the metabolic pathway probably occurred to ensure the internal recycling of electron-carrying species such as NAD [13]. In the butyrate-type metabolic pathway, butyrate is synthesized by the reduction and decarboxylation of pyruvate with the consumption of acetate. Furthermore, the low yield of propionate compared to butyrate during anaerobic fermentation of OMSW can be attributed to the fact that propionate-producing bacteria are strongly inhibited by undissociated propionate, especially when the pH is below 6 [49].
In addition to the mathematical meaning, data modeling also brings physical meaning to the system [50]. The lag phase time (λ = 0) predicted by the modified Gompertz, Monomolecular, Transfer, Logistic, and Richards models, and the value of n < 1 (n = 0.41) predicted by the Fitzhugh model suggested that the adaptation of the microbial community to the fermentative environment was not a bottleneck for fermentation reactions. This information reinforces that the hydrothermal pretreatment fulfilled its function of making the biomass more accessible to microorganisms [13]. Similarly, in the work of Fonseca et al., 2021, the authors observed that the steam explosion of the coffee husk under more severe conditions contributed to improving the reduction of the lag phase of methane production, which was also equal to zero when the biomass was treated at 180 °C and 60 min and 210 °C and 15 min.
It is noteworthy that kinetic data from reliable experimental data are essential for modeling biotechnological systems. This is particularly important because process simulation needs to be strongly supported by data collection for practical validation purposes [51]. In addition, this information supports prospective techno-economic and life-cycle assessments of early-stage technologies, which are important tools to guide development efforts and investment decisions, since they allow identifying sustainability hurdles and opportunities [52,53].

4. Conclusions

A total VFA concentration of 22.7 g L−1 and an amount of longer chain VFAs of 42% were obtained in the optimized condition in this work (S/I = 3 gVS gVS−1 and pH = 8). Clostridium, Escherichia, and Lactobacillus strengthened microbial cooperation to enhance metabolic functions (e.g., carbohydrate and lipid metabolism) for VFA production. It can be concluded that OMSW can be a valuable resource for biorefineries, thus generating a business opportunity for the olive oil industry. Future studies should focus on the chain elongation of carboxylic acids and the upscaling of the technological roadmap, with the aim of advancing the technology readiness level.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.A.d.F. and B.E.L.B.; methodology, A.B.d.C. and Y.A.d.F.; software, P.F.; Y.A.d.F. and G.S.M.G.; validation, A.B.d.C. and Y.A.d.F.; formal analysis, P.F., Y.A.d.F. and G.S.M.G.; investigation, Y.A.d.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A.d.F.; writing—review and editing, L.V.A.G., S.Q.S. and B.E.L.B.; visualization, L.V.A.G., B.E.L.B., S.Q.S.; supervision, B.E.L.B. and L.V.A.G.; funding acquisition, B.E.L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Minas Gerais State Research Funding Agency, grant number APQ-00325-17 and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grant number 438527/2018-6. This study was also financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Atasoy, M.; Owusu-Agyeman, I.; Plaza, E.; Cetecioglu, Z. Bio-Based Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Recovery from Waste Streams: Current Status and Future Challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 268, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zacharof, M.; Lovitt, R. Complex Effluent Streams as a Potential Source of Volatile Fatty Acids. Waste Biomass Valorization 2013, 4, 557–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chandrasekhar, K.; Kumar, S.; Lee, B.D.; Kim, S.H. Waste Based Hydrogen Production for Circular Bioeconomy: Current Status and Future Directions. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 302, 122920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Murali, N.; Srinivas, K.; Ahring, B.K. Biochemical Production and Separation of Carboxylic Acids for Biorefinery Applications. Fermentation 2017, 3, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wainaina, S.; Lukitawesa; Kumar Awasthi, M.; Taherzadeh, M. Bioengineering of Anaerobic Digestion for Volatile Fatty Acids, Hydrogen or Methane Production: A Critical Review. Bioengineered 2019, 10, 437–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Roig, A.; Cayuela, M.L.; Sa, M.A. An Overview on Olive Mill Wastes and Their Valorisation Methods. Waste Manag. 2006, 26, 960–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rodríguez, G.; Lama, A.; Rodríguez, R.; Jiménez, A.; Guillén, R.; Fernández-Bolaños, J. Olive Stone an Attractive Source of Bioactive and Valuable Compounds. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 5261–5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Serrano, A.; Fermoso, F.G.; Rodríguez-Gutierrez, G.; Fernandez-Bolaños, J.; Borja, R. Biomethanization of Olive Mill Solid Waste after Phenols Recovery through Low-Temperature Thermal Pre-Treatment. Waste Manag. 2017, 61, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Yarimtepe, C.; Oz, N.; Ince, O. Volatile Fatty Acid Production Dynamics during the Acidification of Pretreated Olive Mill Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 241, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rincón, B.; Borja, R. Assessment of the Anaerobic Acidogenesis of Wet Olive Cake from a Two-Phase Olive Oil Mill. J. Environ. Sci. Health 2012, 47, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cabrera, F.; Serrano, A.; Torres, Á.; Guillermo, R.-G.; Jeison, D.; Fermoso, F. The Accumulation of Volatile Fatty Acids and Phenols through a pH- Controlled Fermentation of Olive Mill Solid Waste. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Da Fonseca, Y.A.; Silva, N.C.S.; De Camargos, A.B.; Silva, S.D.Q.; Wandurraga, H.J.L.; Gurgel, L.V.A.; Baêta, B.E.L. Influence of Hydrothermal Pretreatment Conditions, Typology of Anaerobic Digestion System, and Microbial Profile in the Production of Volatile Fatty Acids from Olive Mill Solid Waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Angelidaki, I.; Alves, M.; Bolzonella, D.; Borzacconi, L.; Campos, J.L.; Guwy, A.J.; Kalyuzhnyi, S.; Jenicek, P.; Van Lier, J.B. Defining the Biomethane Potential (BMP) of Solid Organic Wastes and Energy Crops: A Proposed Protocol for Batch Assays. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59, 927–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Li, Y.; Chen, Z.; Peng, Y.; Huang, W.; Liu, J.; Mironov, V.; Zhang, S. Deeper Insights into the Effects of Substrate to Inoculum Ratio Selection on the Relationship of Kinetic Parameters, Microbial Communities, and Key Metabolic Pathways during the Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste. Water Res. 2022, 217, 118440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elbeshbishy, E.; Nakhla, G.; Hafez, H. Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) of Food Waste and Primary Sludge: Influence of Inoculum Pre-Incubation and Inoculum Source. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Derringer, G.; Suich, R. Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables. J. Qual. Technol. 1980, 12, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lima, D.; Adarme, O.; Baêta, B.; Gurgel, L.; Aquino, S. Influence of Different Thermal Pretreatments and Inoculum Selection on the Biomethanation of Sugarcane Bagasse by Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion: A Kinetic Analysis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 111, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baêta, B.; Lima, D.; Filho, J.; Adarme, O.; Gurgel, L.; Aquino, S. Evaluation of Hydrogen and Methane Production from Sugarcane Bagasse Hemicellulose Hydrolysates by Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion Process. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 218, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iglesias-Iglesias, R.; Campanaro, S.; Treu, L.; Kennes, C.; Veiga, M.C. Valorization of Sewage Sludge for Volatile Fatty Acids Production and Role of Microbiome on Acidogenic Fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adarme, O.; Eduardo Lobo Baêta, B.; Cardoso Torres, M.; Camilo Otalora Tapiero, F.; Vinicius Alves Gurgel, L.; de Queiroz Silva, S.; Francisco de Aquino, S. Biogas Production by Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sugarcane Biorefinery Byproducts: Comparative Analyses of Performance and Microbial Community in Novel Single-and Two-Stage Systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 354, 127185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Christoff, A.; Fernanda, A.; Sereia, R.; Rodrigues, D.; Lucio, R.; De Moraes, V.; Felipe, L.; De Oliveira, V. Bacterial Identification through Accurate Library Preparation and High-Throughput Sequencing. Neoprospecta Microbiome Technol. 2017, 25, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Langille, M.G.I.; Zaneveld, J.; Caporaso, J.G.; McDonald, D.; Knights, D.; Reyes, J.A.; Clemente, J.C.; Burkepile, D.E.; Vega Thurber, R.L.; Knight, R.; et al. Predictive Functional Profiling of Microbial Communities Using 16S RRNA Marker Gene Sequences. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Li, W.; Chen, H.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, P. Responses of Short-Chain Fatty Acids Production to the Addition of Various Biocarriers to Sludge Anaerobic Fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 122989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Morais, N.W.S.; Coelho, M.M.H.; Silva, A.D.S.E.; Pereira, E.L.; Leitão, R.C.; dos Santos, A.B. Kinetic Modeling of Anaerobic Carboxylic Acid Production from Swine Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Akaike, H.A.I. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 1974, 19, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Motulsky, H.; Christopoulos, A. Fitting Models to Biological Data Using Linear and Nonlinear Regression; GraphPad Software: San Diego, CA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  29. Aghapour Aktij, S.; Zirehpour, A.; Mollahosseini, A.; Taherzadeh, M.; Tiraferri, A.; Rahimpour, A. Feasibility of Membrane Processes for the Recovery and Purification of Bio-Based Volatile Fatty Acids: A Comprehensive Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 81, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reyhanitash, E.; Kersten, S.R.A.; Schuur, B. Recovery of Volatile Fatty Acids from Fermented Wastewater by Adsorption. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 9176–9184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarkar, O.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. Influence of Initial Uncontrolled pH on Acidogenic Fermentation of Brewery Spent Grains to Biohydrogen and Volatile Fatty Acids Production: Optimization and Scale-Up. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 319, 124233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dahiya, S.; Sarkar, O.; Swamy, Y.V.; Venkata Mohan, S. Acidogenic Fermentation of Food Waste for Volatile Fatty Acid Production with Co-Generation of Biohydrogen. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 182, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. López-Garzón, C.S.; Straathof, A.J.J. Recovery of Carboxylic Acids Produced by Fermentation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 873–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Strazzera, G.; Battista, F.; Garcia, N.H.; Frison, N.; Bolzonella, D. Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Food Wastes for BioreFi Nery Platforms: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 226, 278–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Atasoy, M.; Eyice, O.; Schnürer, A.; Cetecioglu, Z. Fatty Acids Production via Mixed Culture Fermentation: Revealing the Link between pH, Inoculum Type and Bacterial Composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, Q.; Bao, X.; Guo, W.; Wang, B.; Li, Y.; Luo, H.; Wang, H.; Ren, N. Medium Chain Carboxylic Acids Production from Waste Biomass: Current Advances and Perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 599–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kleerebezem, R.; Joosse, B.; Rozendal, R.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Anaerobic Digestion without Biogas? Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, D.; Yin, F.; Ma, X. Towards Biodegradable Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production from Wood Waste: Using Volatile Fatty Acids as Conversion Medium. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 299, 122629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gameiro, T.; Sousa, F.; Silva, F.C.; Couras, C.; Lopes, M.; Louros, V.; Nadais, H.; Capela, I. Olive Oil Mill Wastewater to Volatile Fatty Acids: Statistical Study of the Acidogenic Process. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilks, J.C.; Slonczewski, J.L. pH of the Cytoplasm and Periplasm of Escherichia Coli: Rapid Measurement by Green Fluorescent Protein Fluorimetry. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 5601–5607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. De Jonge, R.; Takumi, K.; Ritmeester, W.S.; Van Leusden, F.M. The Adaptive Response of Escherichia Coli O157 in an Environment with Changing pH. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 94, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cao, Q.; Zhang, W.; Lian, T.; Wang, S.; Yin, F.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Dong, H. Roles of Micro-Aeration on Enhancing Volatile Fatty Acids and Lactic Acid Production from Agricultural Wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Atasoy, M.; Cetecioglu, Z. Butyric Acid Dominant Volatile Fatty Acids Production: Bio-Augmentation of Mixed Culture Fermentation by Clostridium Butyricum. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, J.; Fang, W.; Chang, J.; Zhang, G.; Ma, W.; Nabi, M.; Zubair, M.; Zhang, R.; Chen, L.; Huang, J.; et al. Long-Term Rumen Microorganism Fermentation of Corn Stover in Vitro for Volatile Fatty Acid Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 358, 127447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Djemiel, C.; Maron, P.A.; Terrat, S.; Dequiedt, S.; Cottin, A.; Ranjard, L. Inferring Microbiota Functions from Taxonomic Genes: A Review. Gigascience 2022, 11, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Douglas, G.M.; Langille, M.G.I. A Primer and Discussion on DNA-Based Microbiome Data and Related Bioinformatics Analyses. Peer Community J. 2021, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shao, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Fang, S.; Huang, W.; Li, Z.; Fang, X. Upgrading Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Anaerobic Co-Fermentation of Orange Peel Waste and Sewage Sludge: Critical Roles of Limonene on Functional Consortia and Microbial Metabolic Traits. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 362, 127773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liang, J.; Fang, W.; Wang, Q.; Zubair, M.; Zhang, G.; Ma, W.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, P. Metagenomic Analysis of Community, Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways during Corn Straw Fermentation with Rumen Microorganisms for Volatile Fatty Acid Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 126004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, M.; Yan, B.; Wong, J.W.C.C.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Anaerobic Fermentation of Food Waste: A Mini-Review Focusing on Acidogenic Metabolic Pathways. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 248, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ware, A.; Power, N. Modelling Methane Production Kinetics of Complex Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastes Using Sigmoidal Growth Functions. Renew. Energy 2017, 104, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hartmann, F.S.F.; Udugama, I.A.; Seibold, G.M.; Sugiyama, H.; Gernaey, K.V. Digital Models in Biotechnology: Towards Multi-Scale Integration and Implementation. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 60, 108015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cordero-Lanzac, T.; Ramirez, A.; Navajas, A.; Gevers, L.; Brunialti, S.; Gandía, L.M.; Aguayo, A.T.; Mani Sarathy, S.; Gascon, J. A Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment for the Production of Green Methanol from CO2: Catalyst and Process Bottlenecks. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 68, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thomassen, G.; Van Dael, M.; Van Passel, S.; You, F. How to Assess the Potential of Emerging Green Technologies? Towards a Prospective Environmental and Techno-Economic Assessment Framework. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4868–4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fitted response surfaces generated from quadratic models for (a) total VFAs (formic, acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, valeric, and isovaleric acids) concentration (Y1, mg L−1) and (b) amount of C4 and C5 VFAs (Y2, %).
Figure 1. Fitted response surfaces generated from quadratic models for (a) total VFAs (formic, acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, valeric, and isovaleric acids) concentration (Y1, mg L−1) and (b) amount of C4 and C5 VFAs (Y2, %).
Processes 11 00338 g001
Figure 2. Pareto chart of the standardized effects for the substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio, pH, and their interaction on (a) total VFAs concentration (Y1, mg L−1) and (b) amount of C4 and C5 VFAs yielded during anaerobic production of organic acids from olive mill solid waste (Y2, %).
Figure 2. Pareto chart of the standardized effects for the substrate to inoculum (S/I) ratio, pH, and their interaction on (a) total VFAs concentration (Y1, mg L−1) and (b) amount of C4 and C5 VFAs yielded during anaerobic production of organic acids from olive mill solid waste (Y2, %).
Processes 11 00338 g002
Figure 3. (a) Profile of VFAs obtained in each experimental condition of the Doehlert experimental design; (b) Odd-to-even ratio and acidification efficiency obtained in each experimental condition of the Doehlert experimental design.
Figure 3. (a) Profile of VFAs obtained in each experimental condition of the Doehlert experimental design; (b) Odd-to-even ratio and acidification efficiency obtained in each experimental condition of the Doehlert experimental design.
Processes 11 00338 g003
Figure 4. (a) Microbial community composition at the phyla level in fermentative systems under conditions 1 (C1) (S/I = 3 gSV gSV−1, pH = 7) and 4 (C4) (S/I = 1.13 gSV gSV−1, pH = 5. (b) genera with a relative abundance higher than 1% in the acidogenic fermentation systems (conditions 1 and 4) fed with pretreated OMSW substrate.
Figure 4. (a) Microbial community composition at the phyla level in fermentative systems under conditions 1 (C1) (S/I = 3 gSV gSV−1, pH = 7) and 4 (C4) (S/I = 1.13 gSV gSV−1, pH = 5. (b) genera with a relative abundance higher than 1% in the acidogenic fermentation systems (conditions 1 and 4) fed with pretreated OMSW substrate.
Processes 11 00338 g004
Figure 5. Heatmaps of the main functional pathways involved in VFAs production using conditions 1 (C1) and 4 (C4).
Figure 5. Heatmaps of the main functional pathways involved in VFAs production using conditions 1 (C1) and 4 (C4).
Processes 11 00338 g005
Figure 6. The concentration of carboxylic acids and pH of the fermentation medium on the monitored days.
Figure 6. The concentration of carboxylic acids and pH of the fermentation medium on the monitored days.
Processes 11 00338 g006
Table 1. Doehlert design matrix was used for the optimization of the independent variables pH and S/I ratio.
Table 1. Doehlert design matrix was used for the optimization of the independent variables pH and S/I ratio.
Experiment NumberIndependent Variable (Coded)Independent Variable (Uncoded)Dependent Variable
S/IpHS/IpHtVFAs (mg L−1) (Y1)C4 and C5 VFAs (%) (Y2)
110378543.5 ± 531.027.2 ± 2.7
20.50.8662.4911302.3 ± 168.119.0 ± 1.5
3−100.575228.6 ± 636.636.4 ± 3.2
4−0.5−0.8661.1353623.6 ± 262.011.9 ± 1.2
50.5−0.8662.455527.9 ± 168.18.8 ± 0.2
6−0.50.8661.1398816.4 ± 945.213.4 ± 4.2
7001.7577605.3 ± 182.630.3 ± 1.5
8001.7676517.7 ± 431.827.9 ±2.9
9001.7777880.9 ± 319.530.2 ± 1.1
Table 2. Kinetic models selected to describe VFAs production.
Table 2. Kinetic models selected to describe VFAs production.
Kinetic ModelModel Equation
First-order C A t = C A f [ 1 exp ( k C A t ) ]
Second-order C A t = k C A ( C A f ) 2 t 1 + k C A ( C A f ) t
Fitzhugh C A t = C A f [ 1 exp ( k C A t ) n ]
Monomolecular C A t = C A f [ 1 exp ( k C A ( t λ ) ) ]
Modified Gompertz C A t = C A f exp { e x p [ μ m e C A f ( λ t ) + 1 ] }
Logistic C A t = C A f 1 + e x p [ 4 μ m ( λ t ) C A f + 2 ]
Transference C A t = C A f { 1 e x p [ μ m ( t λ ) C A f ] }
Richards C A t = C A f { 1 + ν   e x p ( 1 + ν )   e x p [ μ m C A f ( 1 + ν ) ( 1 + 1 ν ) ( λ t ) ] } ( 1 ν )
CA: carboxylic acids; C A t : CA concentration over time; C A f : final concentration of CA; k C A : first-order CA production rate constant, k C A : second-order CA production rate constant, t : digestion time, n : form constant; e : Euler number; λ : lag phase time; μ m : maximum CA productivity; ν : shape coefficient. [26]
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the dependent variables evaluated in the Doehlert experimental design.
Table 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the dependent variables evaluated in the Doehlert experimental design.
tVFAs Concentration (mg L−1) (Y1)C4 and C5 VFAs (%) (Y2)
Sum of SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean SquareFpSum of SquaresDegrees of FreedomMean SquaresFp
S/I10,120,033110,120,03319.4790.04820.718120.71812.2670.073
(S/I241,4721241,4720.4650.5666.48716.4873.8410.189
pH30,069,869130,069,86957.8800.01734.357134.35720.3440.046
pH²19,279119,2790.0370.865603.8651603.865357.5590.003
S/I x pH84,565184,5650.1630.72619.018119.01811.2610.079
Lack of fit192,7121192,7120.3710.60522.950122.95013.5890.066
Pure error1,039,0482519,524 3.37821.689
Total SS41,806,2718 762.2828
R² R²a pregressionR² R²a pregression
0.970 0.921 0.01670.965 0.908 0.066
The values in bold correspond to statistically significant regression coefficients (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Kinetic parameters were estimated by modeling the VFAs production from anaerobic digestion of pretreated OMSW (S/I = 3 gVS gVS−1, pH = 8).
Table 4. Kinetic parameters were estimated by modeling the VFAs production from anaerobic digestion of pretreated OMSW (S/I = 3 gVS gVS−1, pH = 8).
Kinetic ModelParameters
kCAnλµνR²R²aRMSENRMSEAIC
(d−1)(d)(g L−1 d−1)(%)
First-order0.44 0.810.802.6911.1041.56
Second-order0.04 0.890.892.038.3830.31
Fitzhugh1.070.41 0.810.792.6911.1043.56
Monomolecular0.44 0.00 0.810.792.6911.1043.56
Modified Gompertz 0.006.24 0.770.752.9312.0846.94
Logistic 0.005.85 0.780.752.9112.0346.77
Transference 0.009.92 0.810.792.6911.1043.56
Richards 0.002.220.170.770.732.9312.0848.94
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Fonseca, Y.A.; de Camargos, A.B.; Gomes, G.S.M.; Fregulia, P.; Silva, S.Q.; Gurgel, L.V.A.; Baêta, B.E.L. Enhancing Biobased Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Olive Mill Solid Waste by Optimization of pH and Substrate to Inoculum Ratio. Processes 2023, 11, 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020338

AMA Style

da Fonseca YA, de Camargos AB, Gomes GSM, Fregulia P, Silva SQ, Gurgel LVA, Baêta BEL. Enhancing Biobased Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Olive Mill Solid Waste by Optimization of pH and Substrate to Inoculum Ratio. Processes. 2023; 11(2):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020338

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Fonseca, Yasmim A., Adonai B. de Camargos, Gustavo S. M. Gomes, P. Fregulia, Silvana Q. Silva, Leandro V. A. Gurgel, and Bruno E. L. Baêta. 2023. "Enhancing Biobased Volatile Fatty Acids Production from Olive Mill Solid Waste by Optimization of pH and Substrate to Inoculum Ratio" Processes 11, no. 2: 338. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020338

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop