Next Article in Journal
Characterization of pre-mRNA Splicing Defects Caused by CLCN5 and OCRL Mutations and Identification of Novel Variants Associated with Dent Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Dexamethasone Suppression Testing in a Contemporary Cohort with Adrenal Incidentalomas in Two U.S. Integrated Healthcare Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Lysosomal-Cleavable Peptide Linkers in Antibody–Drug Conjugates
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Accuracy of Adrenal Iodine-131 6-Beta-Iodomethyl-19-Norcholesterol Scintigraphy for the Subtyping of Primary Aldosteronism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Landscape of Adrenal Tumours in Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

by
Mara Carsote
1,2,
Ana-Maria Gheorghe
2,3,*,
Claudiu Nistor
4,5,*,
Alexandra-Ioana Trandafir
2,3,
Oana-Claudia Sima
2,3,
Anca-Pati Cucu
3,5,
Adrian Ciuche
4,5,
Eugenia Petrova
2,6,† and
Adina Ghemigian
2,6,†
1
Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Clinical Endocrinology Department, C.I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
3
Ph.D. Doctoral School of Carol Davila, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department 4—Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, Thoracic Surgery II Discipline, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
5
Thoracic Surgery Department, “Dr. Carol Davila” Central Emergency University Military Hospital, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
6
Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(11), 3081; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113081
Submission received: 26 September 2023 / Revised: 1 November 2023 / Accepted: 15 November 2023 / Published: 16 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adrenal Diseases: An Update)

Abstract

:
Our aim is to update the topic of adrenal tumours (ATs) in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) based on a multidisciplinary, clinical perspective via an endocrine approach. This narrative review is based on a PubMed search of full-length, English articles between January 2014 and July 2023. We included 52 original papers: 9 studies, 8 case series, and 35 single case reports. Firstly, we introduce a case-based analysis of 59 CAH-ATs cases with four types of enzymatic defects (CYP21A2, CYP17A1, CYP17B1, and HSD3B2). Secondarily, we analysed prevalence studies; their sample size varied from 53 to 26,000 individuals. AT prevalence among CAH was of 13.3–20%. CAH prevalence among individuals with previous imaging diagnosis of AT was of 0.3–3.6%. Overall, this 10-year, sample-based analysis represents one of the most complex studies in the area of CAH-ATs so far. These masses should be taken into consideration. They may reach impressive sizes of up to 30–40 cm, with compressive effects. Adrenalectomy was chosen based on an individual multidisciplinary decision. Many tumours are detected in subjects with a poor disease control, or they represent the first step toward CAH identification. We noted a left lateralization with a less clear pathogenic explanation. The most frequent tumour remains myelolipoma. The risk of adrenocortical carcinoma should not be overlooked. Noting the increasing prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas, CAH testing might be indicated to identify non-classical forms of CAH.

1. Introduction

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a cluster of diseases caused by deficiencies in the enzymes involved in steroidogenesis, impairs the synthesis of the cortisol from cholesterol [1,2,3]. The most common deficit is 21-hydroxylase (CYP21A2); it is caused by pathogenic variants in the CYP21A2 gene, located in the long arm of chromosome 6, representing 95% of all CAH cases [4,5,6,7,8]. Other enzymatic deficits include 17 alpha-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase (CYP17A1), 11 beta-hydroxylase (CYP11B1), and more rarely, 3-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II (HSD3B2) [9,10,11]. The degree of CAH severity is inversely correlated to the level of residual enzymatic activity [12,13,14]. CAH diagnosis is based on the clinical presentation, hormonal panel, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) stimulation test, and genetic testing [15,16].
Many countries have established CAH screening programs, and thus the early identification of the condition in most classic forms is at its birth [17,18]. Prenatal diagnosis is also possible, underlying invasive methods such as analysis of the foetal hormones from amniotic fluid, chorionic villus sampling, and non-invasive procedures (cell-free foetal DNA from maternal blood) [1,19,20]. Clinical presentation varies from classical CAH, either salt-wasting (SW-CAH), representing the most severe form, or simple virilizing (SV-CAH), to non-classical CAH (NC-CAH) [1,21]. In countries without a valid neonatal screening protocol, SW-CAH is typically diagnosed at birth due to salt-wasting crises (manifested with vomiting, diarrhoea, severe dehydration, arrhythmias, and extremely low blood sodium levels). SV-CAH may be recognised later in life despite the early virilisation of the genital organs; a mild adrenal insufficiency may be associated, but there is no severe infantile hyponatremia. NC-CAH is often overlooked in daily practice; affected individuals usually present mild androgen excess symptoms [14,22,23,24,25,26].
CAH may be associated with various adrenal tumours/masses, apart from the general imaging aspects of “adrenal hyperplasia” that sometimes mimic a nodular lesion (tumour-like presentation), and the distinction is mainly established upon post-adrenalectomy histological exam. Adrenal tumours have a prevalence of up to 30% according to some authors (myelolipomas being the most frequent type); common pathogenic traits between these masses and CAH are still a matter of debate [1,27,28].
Myelolipomas, also known as myeloid lipomas, are benign, small-growing tumours that have a fat tissue component and elements of myeloid cells. Typical imaging characteristics are related to the presence of fat. Their density varies with the fat-to-myeloid component ratio, while enhancement is low due to the poor blood flow [29,30,31,32]. Sometimes they reach gigantic sizes, causing compression of nearby organs and local symptoms/signs such as abdominal pain, palpable mass, or urinary tract obstruction. Surgical treatment is electively performed in large and symptomatic tumours (those larger than 10 cm should undergo the standard approach, which is open surgery, rather than laparoscopic removal). Adrenalectomy may induce iatrogenic adrenal insufficiency, and thus a careful decision should be made [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Surgery is not usually necessary in asymptomatic myelolipomas and a normal endocrine picture [39,40].
Overall, CAH remains a challenging condition in terms of best management, adequate hormonal substitution (to avoid both over and under treatment), and most practical surveillance protocol [41,42,43]. Adrenal tumours in these patients are generally associated with a late CAH diagnosis and a poor disease control [28]. Current guidelines do not recommend the use of ACTH assays during usual CAH monitoring [1,13]. However, high persistent levels of plasma ACTH represent a potential pathogenic element of the adrenal tumours in CAH [27,28].
Moreover, in addition to myelolipomas, two other specifications should be made when it comes to the overall picture of adrenal tumours in CAH. Adrenocortical carcinoma is extremely rarely reported (and generally, it has a low prevalence in the general population, being considered an orphan disease); it is not yet clear whether the prevalence is higher in CAH than seen in the general population [1]. Correct identification is mandatory, being based on a complex panel of assessments (including imaging findings, urine steroid metabolomics, and post-operatory histological and immunohistochemistry reports) [44,45].
The increasing use of different imaging techniques of diagnosis has identified a larger number of adrenal incidentalomas [46]. It is still a matter of debate if their true frequency is higher in the CAH population or if these patients are the subject of an increased number of imaging evaluations (thus a false increase of their incidence involves individuals with CAH) [46]. Even though NC-CAH poses lower risks compared with SW-CAH and SV-CAH, considering the need for adequate fertility management, genetic advice, and even prenatal treatment in NC-CAH, it is crucial to correctly identify these masses and a careful strategy of intervention or surveillance should be taken into consideration, mostly based on an individual decision according to a multidisciplinary team [47,48,49]. The underlying pathological exam in CAH-related incidentalomas includes myelolipomas, adrenocortical adenomas (and even carcinomas), or typical/atypical hyperplasia [46,47,48,49].
Adrenalectomy is not routinely indicated due to the associated risks of the surgery itself and potential endocrine issues of developing adrenal insufficiency. The question of whether the benefits of adrenalectomy surpass the risks in patients with myelolipomas remains a current matter of interest, while generally incidentalomas need a complete hormonal workup and close surveillance in CAH subjects [46,47,48,49].

Aim

Our purpose is to update adrenal tumour profiles in patients diagnosed with CAH. This is a multidisciplinary, clinical perspective based on an endocrine approach.

2. Material and Methods

This is a narrative review of the English-published, full-length papers on the topic of CAH and adrenal tumours (between January 2014 and July 2023). We performed a PubMed-based search with the following keywords: “21 hydroxylase deficiency”, “11 beta hydroxylase deficiency”, “17 alpha hydroxylase deficiency”, “3 beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase deficiency”, “17 beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase” in different associations with “tumour”, “myelolipoma”, “adrenocortical carcinoma”, “adrenal carcinoma”, “neuroblastoma”, “adrenal tumour”, “adrenal adenoma”, and “incidentaloma”.
The search strategy was dual: identifying adrenal tumours identified in CAH patients or CAH as the underlying diagnosis in patients already confirmed with different adrenal masses. We only included the papers in which the term adrenal „tumour” or „mass” was specified by the original authors and not the studies that introduced the usual adrenal hyperplasia imaging aspects in CAH. We included original studies in humans and excluded experimental, in vitro, and animal studies.
Notably, we kept the original terms “myelolipoma”, “adrenocortical carcinoma”, and “incidentaloma” that were introduced by the cited papers according the original authors, despite the fact that the first two can behave as an incidentaloma as well, but then the tumour should be further characterised based on imaging investigations, hormonal work-ups, histological reports (if available), etc. Statistical analysis was based on prior published data (original articles); we used mean, median, standard deviation, and ranges depending on the parameter. As mentioned, the included original articles were not restricted by the level of statistical significance.
Moreover, we mention that the cases diagnosed with CAH were included regardless of the fact that CAH diagnosis was established only based on the endocrine workup, but not genetically confirmed by the original authors (and we specified this aspect), since real life medicine showed us that in many centres genetic testing is not unanimously available, yet the diagnosis of CAH can be clearly established upon clinical and hormonal assessment [41,42,43]. Of very important note, the adrenal tumours described in the patients diagnosed with CAH were not limited to the presence of the pathological report following adrenalectomy if the original authors specifically provided the imaging features of the tumour (in the absence of adrenal surgery). This is because we did not intend to restrict the search to the histological profile after surgery and since not all the clinicians agree that each tumour detected in one patient with CAH should be removed [1,27,28].

3. Results

After applying the mentioned strategy, we finally included a total of 52 original works: 9 studies, 35 single case reports, and 8 case series. We organised this sample-based, 10-year study according to two main sections: one is represented by a case-based analysis (3.1.) enrolling reports of CAH and adrenal tumours according to our strategy of search. We followed the genetic/enzymatic defects (CYP21A2 in Section 3.1.1., CYP17A1 in Section 3.1.2., CYP17B1 in Section 3.1.3, and HSD3B2 deficiency in Section 3.1.4.) and analysed the clinical presentation, genetic testing results, hormonal work-up, as well as adrenal mass features such as size, histological report (if available), management, and outcome at the moment when these tumours were confirmed in CAH patients.
The second section, Section 3.2, includes larger original studies (not case reports or series) where the prevalence of the adrenal tumours in CAH or of CAH in adrenal tumours was reported amid different clinical, genetic, or imaging characteristics (prevalence studies) (Figure 1).

3.1. Case-Based Analysis of Synchronous CAH and Adrenal Tumours

3.1.1. CYP21A2 Deficiency

3.1.1.1. Characteristics of the Patients

A total of 27 patients [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67], 19 phenotypically males [53,54,55,56,57,58,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67] and 7 phenotypically females [50,51,58], were identified according to our strategy (n = 18 case reports and series). Two male subjects had 46,XX karyotype [57,62]. Overall (N = 27), the median age at presentation was 47 years. The youngest patient was 21 [64], while the oldest was 88 [51]. The median age at CAH diagnosis was 45.5. The median age at tumour diagnosis in these CAH individuals was 46. Most of these mentioned patients with pathogenic variants of CYP21A2 were diagnosed with CAH after the discovery of an adrenal tumour (N = 20) [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,66,67]. Only five persons were previously known with CAH [50,54,64,65] (two more cases’ data were not available). In terms of CAH form, most patients presented with SV-CAH (N = 13) [50,51,55,56,57,58,61,62,63,64,66], followed by NC-CAH (N = 11) [51,52,53,54,59,60,66,67]; only two patients had SW-CAH [64,65], while another subject had a carrier status [51] (Table 1).

3.1.1.2. Features of the Adrenal Tumours/Masses in Patients with CYP21A2 Deficiency

Most tumours were myelolipomas (N = 12/27 patients) [50,54,56,58,60,61,62,63,65,67], followed by incidentalomas (N = 10) [51,53,55,59,64,66]. Two adrenal incidentalomas were classified as adrenocortical adenoma following the post-adrenalectomy pathological report [59,64]; two adrenal masses were classified as hyperplasia, one being an adenomatous hyperplasia [67] and the other “hyperplasia with mild atypia” according to the original terms [57]. Adrenocortical carcinoma was also identified in one patient (1/26) [52]. One subject had both a myelolipoma and an ectopic (renal) adrenocortical adenoma [63], and another suffered from two bilateral myelolipomas and ectopic adrenal rests [65].
The majority of the mentioned cases were unilateral (N = 14, representing 51.8% of the entire cohort). The left adrenal gland [51,52,53,55,59,64] was affected more frequently (63.28% of the unilateral tumours, N = 9) and more severely compared with the right adrenal gland [45,51,57,67]. Bilateral tumours were found in 48.14% of the persons (N = 13); in seven cases, the largest tumour was located in the left adrenal [50,51,54,56,61,66].
A total of 10/27 patients had tumours smaller than 5 cm [51,52,59,63,64,67], while nine tumours were between 5 and 10 cm [51,53,55,57,58,63,65,66], respectively, and the other masses (N = 7) were larger than 10 cm [50,54,56,61,65,67]. Two other tumours were described as “gigantic”, but data regarding the exact size were not provided [60]. Of note, the largest tumours in subjects with genetically confirmed CYP21A2 deficiency were bilateral adrenal masses of 30 by 40 cm on the right, respectively, and of 20 by 25 cm on the left [67]. Increased tumour size caused compression of the nearby organs. Mallappa et al. [58] presented a case of CAH recognition after adrenal tumour diagnosis starting from hyperpigmentation, short stature, and signs of virilisation upon admission for abdominal pain due to kidney compression. A 17-hydroxyprogesterone level 100 times the upper normal limit was confirmed as well as CYP21A2 gene heterozygosity for intron 2 IVS2-13A/C>G splice site pathogenic variant/p.R483P (c.1451_1452 deletion insertion of C) [59] (Table 2).

3.1.1.3. Management and Outcome of the Adrenal Tumours/Masses in Patients with CYP21A2 Deficiency

Most tumours were surgically removed (N = 16) [50,51,52,54,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]; glucocorticoid replacement was offered in 29.6% of the cases (N = 8) [51,53,55,56,59,62]; lifestyle intervention was recommended in one subject (4%) [51]; another refused any medical intervention [51]. Six out of seven patients with tumours over 10 cm underwent surgery (one patient underwent unilateral adrenalectomy two times) [50,54,61,65,67]; yet, another subject with large bilateral myelolipomas of 14 cm at the largest diameter received glucocorticoid treatment; he died shortly after diagnosis due to prostate cancer metastases [56]. Adrenalectomy was performed as well in three patients with tumours <5 cm [52,64], one having an adrenocortical carcinoma of 2 cm [52].
Long-term outcomes are poorly reflected by the published data. Following adrenalectomy, an event-free course at 6 and 12 months follow-up were mentioned in one case [54], respectively, and another subject was offered hydrocortisone and the adrenal mass remained stationary during long-term surveillance [53]. Treatment with glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone was associated with a favourable outcome in another subject with tumour decrease. This is the report of Buitenwerf et al. [55] introducing a 43-year-old male with a left adrenal incidentaloma of 5.2 by 4.4 cm that was accidentally discovered on a computed tomography scan. CAH diagnosis was based on biochemical evaluation, including the response to the ACTH stimulation test. Genetic testing confirmed compound heterozygous genetic variants: c.518T>A (p.Ile173Asn) and c.710T>A, c.713T>A, c.719T>A (p.lIe237Asn), (p.Val238Glu), (p.Met240Lys). After dexamethasone administration (0.5 mg/day) for 1 year, the tumour decreased to 4.4 by 2.9 cm [55].
The most frequent presentation was with abdominal symptoms, namely abdominal pain (N = 5) [50,51,58,60], abdominal discomfort (N = 3) [51] or distention (N = 1) [67], and palpable mass (>10 cm) [54]; alternatively, back pain was reported [63]. Two CAH subjects were admitted for adrenal insufficiency [59,62], one of them being diagnosed 22 years following unilateral adrenalectomy [59]; the case of adrenocortical carcinoma was admitted for gynecomastia [52].
Paradoxically, a 61-year-old male was diagnosed with CAH after the discovery of bilateral myelolipomas (of 18.2 and 7.8 cm maximum diameter, respectively) in association with persistent increased testosterone despite the fact that he was under antiandrogen treatment (leuprolide and bicalutamide) for prostate cancer. The patient received dexamethasone therapy due to lethargy and fatigue, with prompt improvement of symptoms and a decrease in testosterone levels. Genetic testing revealed a CYP21A2 deficiency through bi-allelic genetic variants in the CYP21A2 gene: complete gene deletion on one allele and a C518T>A (I172N) genetic variant on the other [56].
Urinary tract symptoms represent an alternative to the clinical (abdominal) features on first admission. For example, Hui et al. [57] introduced a 65-year-old individual with late CAH diagnosis; the phenotypically male presented lower urinary tract symptoms. Further on, the clinical examination revealed an empty scrotum and small penile length as well as short stature. Increased 17-hydroxyprogesteron and estradiol levels as well as the urinary profile of the steroid metabolites suggested a CYP21A2 deficiency, confirmed by genetic testing (compound heterozygous: p.Ile172Asn, p.Arg483Pro, and p.Met485Trpfs*56 genetic variants); chromosome testing confirmed a 46,XX karyotype. The patient underwent right adrenalectomy due to the discovery of a right adrenal mass of 5.8 cm maximum diameter on computed tomography imaging (that was initially performed in search of intra-abdominal gonads). Pathological examination confirmed adrenal hyperplasia with a mild atypia [57] (Table 3).

3.1.1.4. The Analysis of CAH (Disease) Control in Relationship with Tumour Status

We identified 11 reports that provided data regarding ACTH values for 40% (N = 11) patients [50,53,54,55,59,61,62,63,65,66,67]. ACTH was increased in 9/11 subjects, out of which 3 had tumours >10 cm [50,54,56,61]; 3 individuals had adrenal tumours between 5 and 10 cm [55,62,66], while another 3 persons had tumours <5 cm [59,63,67]. In these patients, ACTH values ranged between 27 pg/mL [55] and 10,445 pg/mL [62], with an average of 1830 pg/mL and a median of 1131 pg/mL. The mean ACTH levels in relationship with the tumour size were 514.5 pg/mL (tumours >10 cm), 3544 pg/mL (tumours: 5–10 cm), and 1434 pg/mL (tumours <5 cm). Of note, the highest ACTH occurred in a subject with bilateral myelolipomas of 6 cm maximum diameter [62], and the lowest ACTH was assessed in a patient with a left adrenal tumour of 5.2 cm [55]. Moreover, normal ACTH was confirmed on an individual with a left adrenal tumour of 5.5 cm by 3.6 cm by 4.5 cm [53].
In terms of 17-hydroxyprogesteron values, 14/18 studies provided data regarding this hormone, out of which 5 had tumours >10 cm [50,54,61,65], 6 had tumours of 5–10 cm [51,53,55,58,62,66], and 7 had tumours <5 cm [51,52,59,63,67]. The levels ranged between 940 ng/dL and 27,500 ng/dL (average of 8499 ng/dL; median of 5700 ng/dL). The mean value, depending on tumour size, was 15,390 ng/dL (tumours >10 cm), 8818.8 ng/dL (tumours of 5–10 cm), and 4287.6 ng/dL (tumours <5 cm); the highest value was identified in an individual with a left adrenal mass of 12.5 cm maximum size in association with a diffuse nodular enlargement of the right adrenal [61], while the lowest was diagnosed in a patient with a left adrenal mass of 3–4 cm [59].
Late CAH diagnosis was present in at least 12 patients [51,52,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,66,67], while lack of treatment or poor compliance with CAH therapy was specifically addressed in some cases [50,59,64]. Adequate diagnosis in CAH might bring unexpected results, such as the identification of ectopic myelolipomas [63]. Two other cases of myelolipoma and uncontrolled CAH were reported by Almeida et al. [50]. Another sign of poor disease control at the moment of adrenal tumour co-diagnosis was hyperpigmentation (N = 3) [58,59,62] (Table 4).

3.1.2. CYP17A1 Deficiency

A total of six patients, all phenotypically female, but one with a 46,XY karyotype 7, were identified with CYP17A1 deficiency across three single case reports and one case series of five patients with myelolipomas (out of fifteen individuals tested for CAH genetic variants belonging to two unrelated families), and three of them were identified with the mentioned enzymatic defect [60,68,69,70].
The average age at presentation was 33.1 years, with a median of 34. The youngest subject was 27 years old [69], while the oldest was 37 [60]. Five out of six individuals presented myelolipomas [60,69,70]; one subject out of six was confirmed with an adrenocortical adenoma [68]; 50% (N = three) of the sample-based cohort had bilateral tumours [60,69]. All unilateral tumours (N = three subjects) were on the left adrenal gland [60,68,70]. The largest adrenal tumour was found by Liu et al. [60] (20 by 15 by 10 cm). This patient had giant bilateral tumours and shared a compound heterozygous genetic variant (c.1118A>T, p.H373L, c.1459_1467del9, and p.D487_F489del) with two of her sisters [60]. The dimensions of the adrenal mass in an individual harbouring a tumour are 10 by 6.3 by 8.6 cm, associated with a compound heterozygous genetic variant for p.Tyr329fs (c.985_987delTACinsAA) and a missense genetic variant p.His373Leu (c.1118A>T) [68]. Moreover, Chang et al. [70] reported a left adrenal mass of 5 by 9 cm associated with a genetic profile of a heterozygous variant of c.985_987delinsAA (p.Y329Kfs*90) and the p.R96W genetic variant [70].
Five of six patients with CYP17A1 deficiency had hypokalaemia at the moment when the adrenal tumour was confirmed [60,69,70]. Arterial hypertension was also noted in three cases (50%) [60,70]; other symptoms included headaches and fatigue [60]; only one individual had abdominal pain due to a tumour of >10 cm [68].
All subjects (N = 6) had high ACTH or high normal ACTH, with values ranging from 41.56 pg/mL [69] and 1250 pg/mL [60], with an average of 394.5 pg/mL; the highest ACTH value was found in the patient with the largest tumour [60]. However, an ACTH—tumour size correlation was not confirmed due to a small sample size. Plasma cortisol levels were provided in five of six persons, all of whom had low values [60,68,69,70]. Aldosterone was increased in two cases (if available) [68,70]. Data regarding 17-hydroxyprogesterone were provided for one female who presented with a very low level of < 0.05 ng/mL [69].
Five of six subjects underwent adrenal surgery [60,68,70]; one patient out of six was managed with dexamethasone 0.75 mg per day and showed a reduction of the adrenal tumour diameter [69].
In terms of outcome, five of six patients had an adrenal tumour removal [60,68,70]. The patient of Lee et al. [68] postoperatively developed nausea, weakness in association with elevated ACTH, and blunted cortisol response to stimulation test. At the 3-year follow-up, progression of the right adrenal hyperplasia was associated with high ACTH levels and poor compliance with glucocorticoid treatment [68] (Table 5).

3.1.3. CYP11B1 Deficiency

We identified one case report with a CYP11B1 deficiency. Ozbas et al. [71] presented a 35-year-old female with genital reconstruction during childhood who suffered from hypertension science at the age of 12. She had a left adrenal mass of 7.4 cm associated with hypokalaemia, high ACTH, and androstenedione. Adrenalectomy had a favourable outcome, with post-surgery confirmation of a myelolipoma. Genetic analysis revealed a homozygous missense genetic variant: c.1385T>C L462P variant (NM_000497.3) in the CYP11B1 gene [71] (Table 6).

3.1.4. HSD3B2 Deficiency

We mention an analysis coming from a larger study on HSD3B2 deficiency. Ladjouze et al. [72] studied 14 out of 273 patients with classic CAH who suffered from HSD3B2 deficiency. Out of these 14 individuals (coming from 10 families), 3 females had adrenal tumours and SW-CAH (all with a history of consanguinity). CAH diagnosis was established early (13, 15, and 16 years, respectively; two of them were sisters). Both siblings carried the p.(Thr152_Pro155del) genetic variant. One of them had a large left adrenal mass of 6.3 by 5.2 by 5.1 cm. Histological examination following adrenalectomy proved an adrenocortical hyperplasia in one case, while her sister presented a smaller left adrenal mass of 2.5 cm and she continued surveillance. The third patient, harbouring a p.(Pro222Gln) pathogenic variant, had a right adrenal mass (of 3 cm) with necrotic areas that was removed due to a high malignancy suspicion; however, the histological report also showed an adrenal hyperplasia. This patient was associated with an ovarian adrenal rest tumour [72].
Overall, the topic of the adrenal tumours/masses in cases with CYP11B1 and HSD3B2 defects remains at a low level of statistical evidence and awareness is necessary, while no clear hormonal—adrenal tumour correlations can be established so far (Table 7).

3.1.5. Adrenal Tumours in Patients Diagnosed with CAH without a Genetic Confirmation

We identified 18 case reports and 1 case series (N = 22 patients) of CAH and adrenal tumours where genetic testing was either not performed (N = 17) or negative (N = 5). Most subjects were diagnosed with CYP21A2 deficiency (N = 17) [64,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89], while another had CYP17A1 deficiency [89]; four other cases did not have a specific enzymatic deficit available (according to a limited genetic testing panel), but considering that CYP21A2 has the highest prevalence, they would be very likely to suffer from it [85,86,87,88].
The scenario of detecting an adrenal tumour starts from an adrenal imaging scan; an individual decision is taken with respect to adrenalectomy. For example, we mention a 26-year-old patient who presented with hypertension and hypokalaemia who was diagnosed with 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase deficiency according to biochemical and endocrine findings (low plasma cortisol, 17-hydroxyprogesteron, respectively, high ACTH and deoxycorticosterone, as well as hypogonadotropic hypogonadism). Genetic testing for CYP17A1 genetic variants was unavailable. The patient’s karyotype was 46,XY. Magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal any gonads. Glucocorticoids and oestrogens were initiated. A left adrenalectomy was performed due to an asymmetrical enlargement of the left adrenal and associated persistent abdominal pain. A pathological examination confirmed a myelolipoma [89].
Out of the 22 patients, 15 were phenotypically male [51,73,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,85,87,88] and 4 were phenotypically female [51,74,84]; one phenotypically male had 46,XX karyotype [82]; one phenotypically female had 46,XY karyotype [89]; and one subject born female was identifying as male [86]. The mean age at adrenal tumour identification was 44.5 years (a median of 43). The youngest patient was 26 years old [89], and the oldest was 68 years old [84] (Table 8).
Most patients were diagnosed with CAH before the actual discovery of an adrenal tumour (N = 13/22); some of them displayed an early CAH confirmation. For example, three were diagnosed as neonates [78,86,87], and seven of them were diagnosed during infancy or childhood [64,73,74,75,76,82,83,88]; two subjects had an uncertain time of CAH diagnosis before presentation for adrenal tumours [81,85]). On the opposite side, 9/22 individuals were identified with CAH after the discovery of the adrenal masses [51,77,79,80,84,89]. Late CAH confirmation was established in some individuals (N = 5) [77,79,80,84,89], while others, despite prior diagnosis, were poorly compliant with specific CAH therapy (N = 5) [73,74,86,87,88].
In terms of CAH form, most patients presented with SV-CAH (N = 7) [64,74,76,79,80,81,82], followed by SW-CAH (N = 6) [75,78,83,86,87,88] and NC-CAH (N = 5) [51,84]; there was also one carrier [51]. The most frequent tumours were myelolipomas (N = 14) [64,73,74,75,76,79,80,81,84,85,86,87,88,89], respectively, incidentalomas (N = 8) [51,79,80,82,84], adrenocortical adenoma (N = 2) [77,82], and adrenocortical carcinoma (N = 2) [78,81] and lipoma (N = 1) [83].
The majority of the tumours were bilateral (N = 18/22 subjects, 13 of them having a larger mass on the left than right side) [51,64,73,75,76,78,84,86,87,88,89]; 4/22 had unilateral adrenal masses (all of them being located at the left adrenal gland) [74,80,82,85]. Most tumours were >10 cm (N = 12) [73,74,75,76,78,81,83,84,85,86,87,88], and 5/12 were larger than 20 cm [73,74,75,85,87], the largest being >30 cm [75,85]; five subjects had tumours of 5–10 cm [77,79,80,82,89], and four persons had tumours <5 cm [51,64]. Of note, all patients with SW-CAH had adrenal masses >10 cm [75,78,83,86,87,88]. The largest myelolipoma was reported by Longoria-Dubocq et al. [85] in a 36-year-old male with prior known CA associated with good adherence to the treatment and regular follow-up. He presented abdominal pain; a computed tomography scan found a left retroperitoneal mass of 30 by 23.6 by 16.7 cm, being referred to adrenalectomy (myelolipoma) [85]. Kale et al. [75] reported the second largest myelolipoma on a 51-year-old male with SW-CAH identified during infancy [75]. Overall, most subjects who were confirmed to have unilateral or bilateral adrenal tumours underwent adrenalectomy (N = 15/22) [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
The clinical picture at the moment of the adrenal tumour recognition mostly involved abdominal complaints such as pain [52,76,85], distension [73,74,86], nausea, and vomiting [74,76,86]. Other elements included back pain [75], lower limbs paresthesiasis [75], dysuria [83], and one case of acute adrenal insufficiency (including hyperpigmentation) [77], but there was also one case with CYP17A1 deficiency-related arterial hypertension [89].
Data regarding the outcomes in these individuals (N = 22) are relatively scarce, varying from a good evolution with symptoms remission [76,83], disease-free following adrenalectomy [82] to rapid relapse (one patient had a nodularity at the adrenal bed at 3-month follow-up) [88].
Hormonal panels were focused on CAH diagnosis depending on the specific enzyme defect. Eleven studies provided data regarding ACTH values for 11/22 subjects [73,77,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97]; the hormone was increased in 8/11 cases [77,79,80,81,84,86,87,89], out of which 4/8 had tumours >10 cm [81,84,86,87], and 4/8 had tumours of 5–10 cm [77,79,80,89]; ranges varied between 37.5 pg/mL (which is a normal value; overall, N = 3 individuals had normal ACTH) [83] and 2000 pg/mL [77] (average of 342.9 pg/mL; median of 166 pg/mL). Tumour size—ACTH analyses showed in cases with masses larger than 10 cm, respectively, between 5 and 10 cm, a mean ACTH of 128 pg/mL and 753.8 pg/mL, respectively. Interestingly, the highest ACTH was registered in one patient with a right adrenal mass of 5 cm and a left adrenal mass of 4.1 cm that were found 9 years after a right adrenalectomy was performed [77], while the lowest value was confirmed in a subject with bilateral adrenal masses of 10 cm and 19 cm, respectively [83]. Overall, 3/22 tumours were confirmed at the moment of good disease (CAH) control, and that is why a tide association is difficult to establish [82,83,85].
In terms of 17-hydroxyprogesterone values, 13 studies provided these values [51,73,77,79,80,81,82,83,84,86,87,88,89], namely including a total of 16/22 patients (7/16 had adrenal masses larger than >10 cm). The values varied between 10 and 25,018 ng/dL (a median of 1756 ng/dL); hormone value—tumour size analysis showed a mean level of 11,521 ng/dL (tumours >10 cm), 4330 ng/dL (tumours of 5–10 cm), and 219.5 ng/dL (tumours <5 cm). Of note, the highest value occurred in a patient with bilateral adrenal masses of 10.5 cm (left) and 7.6 cm (right) [84] (Table 9).

3.2. Prevalence Studies on CAH and Adrenal Tumours

Apart from the mentioned case reports/series, nine studies [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98] addressed the issue of CAH and adrenal tumours from different perspectives, such as CAH prevalence among the individuals diagnosed with adrenal tumours/incidentalomas [90,91,92] or long-term outcomes in relationship with disease control and adrenal morphology, particularly, the identification of distinct adrenal tumours [93,94,95,96,97,98].
A study investigating the relationship between CAH control and adrenal imaging aspects was conducted by Kim et al. [96]; the retrospective cohort included 90 adults with 21-hydroxlase deficiency and 270 healthy controls; 12/90 (13.3%) subjects were diagnosed with adrenal tumours: unilateral (N = 9/12) and bilateral (N = 3/12). Except for one adrenocortical adenoma, all tumours were identified as myelolipomas based on radiologic (computed tomography) findings. Higher levels of ACTH, 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione, and progesterone sulphate levels were associated with the presence of these masses, but no correlation between hormonal values and tumour size was established [96]. Similarly, a retrospective study on 88 patients with classic CAH revealed a myelolipoma prevalence of 12.5% (N = 11), respectively, of benign adenomas of 9% (N = 8); one pheochromocytoma was reported as well (this represents the only case reported during the latest 10 years) [95]. Another study regarding long-term consequences of CAH (CYP21A2 deficiency) followed 20 subjects (among a total of 53) via adrenal ultrasound: 3/20 subjects with SV-CAH had adrenal adenomas; 1/20 cases of SV-CAH was associated with adrenocortical carcinoma at the age of 15; 1/20 patients with SV-CAH presented a myelolipoma [93].
The prevalence of CAH in subjects diagnosed with adrenal incidentalomas varied between 0.3% and 3.6% [90,91,92,94,97,98,99]. Kiedrowickz et al. [91] analysed the prevalence of NC-CAH among adults with adrenal incidentalomas (N = 100). The most common genetic variants of CYP21A2 were tested; 8/100 (0.8%) persons had CYP21A2 pathogenic variants (and 3/8 of them exceeded the cut-offs for stimulated 17-hydroxyprogesterone). When compared to a control group of healthy neonates (as a substitute for the prevalence of these genetic variants in the general population), the CYP21A2 genetic variant prevalence was statistically significantly higher in patients confirmed to have incidentalomas (N = 3 subjects with P30L, N = 3 with P453S, and N = 2 with V281L). The mean tumour size was 2.4 cm (between 1.6 cm and 3.7 cm) [91]. Similarly, Patrova et al. [92] analysed 637 patients with adrenal incidentalomas from the perspective of underlying CAH; 2/637 (0.3%) were confirmed to have CAH; both cases have been previously reported [51,100]. A bias of interpretation of this rate came from the fact that not all the patients were specifically tested for CAH. Yet, a subgroup was assessed either by urinary steroids profile (N = 26) or by 17-hydroxyprogesterone assays (N = 47), and thus CAH prevalence increased to 2.9% [92]. A prospective cohort of 228 adrenal incidentalomas identified late-onset CAH in 1.8% of them (N = 4) [94]. Sahlander et al. [97] analysed CAH prevalence in 320 subjects with adrenal incidentalomas by using an ACTH stimulation test and genetic confirmation; 8/222, representing 3.6%, had NC-CAH (only this subgroup of 222 individuals was assessed via the mentioned dynamic test; a cut-off of 17-hydroxyprogesterone of ≥30 nmol/L was applied) based on an ACTH stimulation test and not basal levels (with negative genetic testing with respect to CYP21A2 gene). Fifty percent of the individuals with NC-CAH based on an ACTH stimulation test had bilateral adrenal tumours (and the others had unilateral masses). A larger size was correlated with a positive stimulation test, with diameters ranging from 1.6 to 6.6 cm (median of 3.8 cm) [97].
A retrospective, register-based study on 26,573 individuals with adrenal tumours versus 144,124 controls (without adrenal tumours) analysed the prevalence of CAH, which was 0.75‰ (N = 20) versus 0.0007‰ (N = 1); there was an odds ratio (OR) of 109, and 95% CI: 15–809 (p < 0.0001). Regarding the CAH subgroup with adrenal masses (N1 + N2), the timeline relationship was as follows: 5 subjects had a CAH diagnosis before the tumour identification (N1 = 5) and 15 individuals were confirmed to have CAH after the tumour finding (N2 = 15). The mean age at tumour diagnosis was 55.6 ± 14.7 years (N1 + N2); N1 seemed to be older than N2 (of 58 ± 14 versus 47.6 ± 15.7 years), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the perspective of analysing the age at CAH diagnosis showed a statistically significant decrease of N1 versus N2 (11.8 ± 26.4 versus 60.7 ± 13.5 years). N1 included SW-CAH or SV-CAH (80%) and one case of suspected NC-CAH (20%); N2 included NC-CAH (80%, N = 12) and SV-CAH (20%, N = 3). Adrenalectomy was performed in 35% (N = 7) of the subgroups N1 + N2 (five unilateral and two bilateral adrenalectomy coming from N1 subgroup). All resected tumours were non-functioning, benign adenomas of the cortex (adrenocortical carcinoma was suspected, but not confirmed, in two cases). Of note, two patients died of an adrenal crisis 2 years and 9 years, respectively, following the initial tumour diagnosis [98]. Moreover, Askitis et al. [90] investigated 187 participants with adrenal tumours and identified one case (0.53%) of CAH (a 49-year-old male who was diagnosed during kidney transplant investigations) [90] (Table 10).

4. Discussion

4.1. From Case-Sample Analysis to Prevalence Studies

The analysis of published case reports and series showed, as expected, that the majority of data concerned 21-hydroxylase deficiency (13 single case reports and 5 case series, with a maximum of 5 patients per paper with respect to 27 subjects diagnosed with synchronous CAH that was genetically confirmed and adrenal tumours), followed by CYP17A1 deficiency (3 single case reports, 1 case series with 3 patients/paper, N = 6), CYP11B1 deficiency (1 single case report, N = 1), and HSD3B2 deficiency (1 case series; N = 3); respectively, there were cases of CAH without a specific genetic confirmation (18 case reports and 1 case series; N = 22), and thus there was a total of 59 patients across 43 original papers (Figure 2).
Most patients with genetically confirmed CAH were diagnosed after the discovery of the adrenal tumours [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], while the majority of the individuals without a genetic confirmation had a known (prior) diagnosis of CAH at presentation for the adrenal mass [64,73,74,75,76,78,85,86,87,88]. SV-CAH was the most prevalent form in both mentioned groups (with genetic confirmation and without). The highest rate among tumours was for myelolipoma (N = 42), and all patients with CYP17A1 deficiency and the one with CYP11B1 deficit had this type; however, two-thirds of subjects with HSD3B2 deficiency actually had adrenocortical hyperplasia. Incidentaloma (N = 18) was the second-most frequent tumour, but this radiological term might underline different histological reports (if surgery is decided), including myelolipomas [51,52,55,59,64,65,66,79,80,82,84]. Although rare, adrenocortical carcinoma was reported in three patients [52], and it has been reported before our timeframe of research [99]. The largest diameter was 40 cm (in a case of a myelolipoma) [67].
The most common presentation in both groups included abdominal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort, pain, distension, nausea, and vomiting (either caused by a large adrenal mass or by adrenal insufficiency) [57,59,62,75,77,83]. In terms of treatment, most patients underwent surgery, especially for adrenal lesions larger than 10 cm.
In both groups, ACTH values (if available) were increased in most subjects; ACTH values did not correlate with tumour size. 17-hydroxyprogesterone was elevated as well, and it seemed higher in individuals with larger tumours (with regard to both groups of genetically confirmed and unconfirmed CAH).
Considering that genetic confirmation is not always commonly available, there are still many reports of patients diagnosed with CAH based on hormonal profiles or ACTH stimulation tests. Some of them, however, were diagnosed at birth with SW-CAH forms. Current findings suggest an under diagnosis of SV-CAH, especially in patients with concurrent adrenal tumours. Lack of treatment leading to increased ACTH (sometimes clinically expressed as hyperpigmentation) [58] may induce a tumour growth up to very large diameters of over 10 cm, affecting nearby organs, including kidney compression [58]. Patients suffering from SV-CAH may benefit from an early diagnosis and treatment, including the scenario of developing an adrenal mass.
Regarding laterality, the left side seemed more affected in cases of unilateral lesions or larger on the left adrenal in cases of bilateral tumours. A bias in recognition due to anatomical differences was suggested as a potential explanation [100,101,102,103,104]. Another explanation may be related to the morphological differences, leading to a predisposition for left adrenal tumours. These include a higher volume and therefore a larger pool of cells, asymmetries of the vascular supply and drainage, as well as differences in gland innervation [101].
Moreover, as mentioned, prevalence studies showed that awareness of CAH and adrenal tumour combination is necessary, either starting from patients who received a diagnosis of an adrenal tumour (particularly, of an incidentaloma) or of CAH. Two prospective and seven retrospective (including a registry-based cohort) studies have addressed the present topic, thus providing a good level of statistical evidence, enrolling from 53/88 patients (the smallest sample sizes) to more than 26,000 individuals, depending on the study design. Among CAH cases, adrenal tumours were reported in up to 13.3% of them [96], respectively, 20% [95], while among individuals with previous imaging diagnosis of an adrenal tumour/incidentaloma, the rate of detecting CAH was 0.3% [92], 0.53% [90], 0.8% [91], 1.8% [94], 2.9% [92], 3.6% [97], and 0.75‰ [98]. An important aspect remains the lack of systematic genetic confirmation in many of these patients.

4.2. Histological Profile of CAH-Associated Adrenal Tumours

The most frequent tumour in CAH was myelolipoma, in accordance with prior published data [105,106]. Even though computed tomography-based aspects of myelolipomas consist of fat density, usually negative, there are cases of myelolipomas with a heterogeneous appearance resembling an adrenocortical carcinoma. Differential diagnosis is crucial in these cases [66]. Of note, non-adrenal sites of myelolipoma have been reported as well (for example, mediastinal or renal) in non-CAH patients [107,108]; also, adrenocortical adenoma with myelolipomatous metaplasia should be taken into consideration as an alternative differential diagnosis [109].
Adrenocortical carcinoma was reported in 3 out of 59 patients according to the sample-based analysis (5.2%) [52,78,81], this rate being 10 times more frequent than in the general population [44]. For instance, a reported case was associated with bilateral myelolipomas on a 32-year-old patient with SW-CAH diagnosed as a neonate, presented with rapidly growing bilateral masses and poor hormonal control. The largest lesion was on the left adrenal side, exceeding 19 cm. A left adrenalectomy was performed and a histological exam identified an adrenocortical carcinoma. Moreover, the patient had a history of testicular adrenal rest tumour. Mitotane was initiated while waiting for the right adrenalectomy (no genetic test was available) [78]. Generally, the condition is extremely aggressive, and it requires particular attention due to its highly aggressive potential, regardless of CAH co-presence [110,111]. Larger studies are necessary to establish if adrenocortical carcinoma is indeed more frequent among CAH patients or if it is a mere coincidence. According to current data and considering the severity of this disease, the possibility of an adrenal tumour in a patient with CAH being carcinoma should not be overlooked [52,78,81].
Whether hormonal panels, particularly high ACTH and 17-hydroxyprogesterone, are part of the pathogenic elements in CAH-associated tumours is yet to be established. A link between CAH control and the development of adrenal tumours was based on the observations that a high prevalence of late diagnosis and non-compliance with treatment was registered among these patients. In subjects with 3BHSD deficiency, 17-hydroxypregnenolone might be a better predictor of disease control and tumour risk than 17-hydroxyprogesterone [71,72].
Another subject of controversy might be claimed by continuing changes of the terminology and classifications in the area of adrenal tumours [112]. Our decade-based analysis included the original terms (from the publications), since it is difficult to adjust them to current names and this might come as a potential source of bias. As mentioned, we did not include CAH cases with typical adrenal hyperplasia at initial imaging assessment unless a tumour was particularly diagnosed (despite the fact that some post-adrenalectomy reports in fact showed an adrenal hyperplasia in some tumours, as they had been identified at computed tomography or magnetic resonance exams) [52,67] (Figure 3).
Finally, from our perspective, one of the greatest pitfalls of touching the topic of adrenal tumours in CAH is represented by addressing the term “adrenal incidentaloma”. Generally, an accidentally detected tumour at any organ subscribes to this name; however, the strictly endocrine perspective also means a negative endocrine profile and a slow growth rate (actually, the most common endocrine incidentaloma is a thyroid nodule, but the term is not usually applied to this gland in daily practice, but rather for adrenals and pituitary glands) [113,114]. Yet, as seen in mentioned studies, incidentalomas in CAH were not always harmless and the histological reports were heterogeneous, and thus the presence of an incidentaloma in CAH remains an open chapter and awareness of its particular significance is needed. Also, it might seem that CAH patients are more frequently assessed and thus it increases the risk of detecting an adrenal tumour, but, as already shown, many adrenal masses were found in poorly controlled and uncompliant cases; that is why a general conclusion is debatable. Moreover, our 10-year sample-based study included the COVID-19 pandemic period (between March 2020 and the first months of 2023); it is difficult to establish if fewer imaging investigations have been performed in these patients due to the medical and social regulations amid first waves. However, as seen in other medical and surgical domains, the pandemic impact should be noted when referring to the incidence of tumours, including adrenal incidentalomas [115,116,117,118,119,120].

4.3. A Matter of Surgery or Surgery Matters

Most patients were managed surgically (38/59), especially those with the largest tumours and the symptomatic subjects. The question of whether adrenalectomy may be postponed remains open, considering the fact that the majority of the adrenal masses were myelolipomas, slow-growing, benign tumours that had clear characteristics on computed tomography imaging. However, the gigantic sizes of up to 40 cm indicate that the subjects should be monitored to identify and remove in time such large tumours, which can possibly cause compression of nearby organs, which indicates adrenalectomy [121]. Whether the adrenal removal will be performed via a traditional approach or the laparoscopic route (that is preferred nowadays) represents a strictly surgical decision based on prior endocrinological and imaging assessments, as generally seen in other areas of adrenal tumours [122,123].
When choosing surgery, it is important to know whether patients with adrenal tumours may suffer from CAH, due to the risk of developing adrenal insufficiency [59,77]. Sometimes, adrenal failure occurs years after (unilateral) surgery [77]. Currently, the decision of adrenal removal is based on an individual decision rather than a guideline indication. Falhammar et al. [124] showed in 2016 according to a meta-analysis (n = 36 articles) with respect to CAH or carrier status in patients with adrenal incidentalomas that bilateral tumours “were frequent in CAH” (but bilateral lesions did not predict the most frequent CAH deficiency, namely CYP21A2) [124]. Consequently, the decision of tumour removal is even more challenging in these cases.

4.4. Limits of the Topic and Further Expansion

We are aware of the potential bias that comes with a narrative review, but we intended to cover a heterogeneous panel of issues in the area of adrenal tumours and CAH and not restrict the research. Also, the level of statistical significance of the cited papers varied from a single case report to studies with large sample sizes. Whether disease control or high ACTH levels are contributors to the development of such adrenal tumours in CAH is yet to be explored as a potential pathogenic link. Another potential bias may be the fact that the incidental detection of a tumour in a patient diagnosed with CAH does not necessarily mean causality, only a co-existence and that further studies are necessary. Also, the largest tumours are usually referred to adrenalectomy, and thus a potential bias with respect to the histological report of the entire panel of different tumours is expected. As mentioned, the term “incidentalomas” is not associated with any pathological report, and that is why the exact imaging-histological picture is difficult to assess in the absence of surgery. Another open issue remains the selection of adrenalectomy candidates and the exact protocol of imaging surveillance in CAH.

5. Conclusions

This 10-year, sample-based analysis represents one of the most complex analyses in the area of adrenal tumours in CAH so far. These masses should be taken into consideration for various reasons. They may reach impressive sizes of up to 30–40 cm, sometimes leading to symptoms such as abdominal pain and urinary tract obstruction. In these cases, adrenalectomy is the preferred management. Many such tumours are actually detected in subjects with poor disease control, or they represent the first step toward CAH identification. We noted a left lateralization with a pathogenic explanation that is less clear at the present time. The most frequent tumour remains myelolipoma. However, the risk of adrenocortical carcinoma should not be overlooked. Moreover, with the increasing prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas, CAH testing might be indicated, including to identify NC-CAH forms to provide adequate management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., A.-I.T., A.-P.C., O.-C.S., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; methodology, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., O.-C.S., A.-P.C., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; software, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., O.-C.S., A.-I.T., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; validation, M.C., A.-M.G., O.-C.S., C.N., A.-I.T., A.-P.C., E.P. and A.G.; formal analysis, M.C., A.-M.G., O.-C.S., A.-I.T., A.-P.C., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; investigation, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., O.-C.S., A.-I.T., A.-P.C., A.C. and A.G.; resources, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., A.-I.T., O.-C.S., A.-P.C., A.C. and E.P; data curation, M.C., A.-M.G., O.-C.S., C.N., A.-P.C., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-M.G. and M.C.; writing—review and editing, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., A.-I.T., O.-C.S., A.-P.C., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; visualization, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., O.-C.S., A.-I.T., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; supervision, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., A.-I.T., O.-C.S., A.-P.C., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; project administration, M.C., A.-M.G., C.N., A.-I.T., O.-C.S., A.-P.C., A.C., E.P. and A.G.; funding acquisition, M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania, via the institutional program “Publish not Perish”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania, through the institutional program “Publish not Perish”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACTHAdrenocorticotropic Hormone
CAHcongenital adrenal hyperplasia
CYP21A221-hydroxylase
CYP17A117alpha-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase
CYP11B111-beta hydroxylase
HSD3B23-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II
CIconfidence interval
NCnon-classical
SVsimple virilizing
ORodds ratio
SWsalt-wasting

References

  1. Claahsen-van der Grinten, H.L.; Speiser, P.W.; Ahmed, S.F.; Arlt, W.; Auchus, R.J.; Falhammar, H.; Flück, C.E.; Guasti, L.; Huebner, A.; Kortmann, B.B.M.; et al. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia-Current Insights in Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Management. Endocr. Rev. 2022, 43, 91–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Auer, M.K.; Nordenström, A.; Lajic, S.; Reisch, N. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Lancet 2023, 401, 227–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Witchel, S.F. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2017, 30, 520–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Carvalho, B.; Marques, C.J.; Santos-Silva, R.; Fontoura, M.; Carvalho, D.; Carvalho, F. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Due to 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency: An Update on Genetic Analysis of CYP21A2 Gene. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2021, 129, 477–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pignatelli, D.; Carvalho, B.L.; Palmeiro, A.; Barros, A.; Guerreiro, S.G.; Macut, D. The Complexities in Genotyping of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parajes, S.; Quinteiro, C.; Domínguez, F.; Loidi, L. High frequency of copy number variations and sequence variants at CYP21A2 locus: Implication for the genetic diagnosis of 21-hydroxylase deficiency. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Parajes, S.; Quinterio, C.; Domínguez, F.; Loidi, L. A simple and robust quantitative PCR assay to determine CYP21A2 gene dose in the diagnosis of 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Clin. Chem. 2007, 53, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nordenström, A.; Lajic, S.; Falhammar, H. Long-Term Outcomes of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 37, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Auchus, R.J. The uncommon forms of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2022, 29, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Asirvatham, A.R.; Balachandran, K.; Jerome, P.; Venkatesan, V.; Koshy, T.; Mahadevan, S. Clinical, biochemical and genetic characteristics of children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 17α-hydroxylase deficiency. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 33, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Krone, N.; Arlt, W. Genetics of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 23, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Uslar, T.; Olmos, R.; Martínez-Aguayo, A.; Baudrand, R. Clinical Update on Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Adrenal Program. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Speiser, P.W.; Azziz, R.; Baskin, L.S.; Ghizzoni, L.; Hensle, T.W.; Merke, D.P.; Meyer-Bahlburg, H.F.; Miller, W.L.; Montori, V.M.; Oberfield, S.E.; et al. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 4133–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arriba, M.; Ezquieta, B. Molecular Diagnosis of Steroid 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency: A Practical Approach. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 834549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Podgórski, R.; Aebisher, D.; Stompor, M.; Podgórska, D.; Mazur, A. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Clinical symptoms and diagnostic methods. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2018, 65, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Török, D. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Exp. Suppl. 2019, 111, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Therrell, B.L.; Padilla, C.D.; Loeber, J.G.; Kneisser, I.; Saadallah, A.; Borrajo, G.J.; Adams, J. Current status of newborn screening worldwide: 2015. Semin. Perinatol. 2015, 39, 171–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van der Linde, A.A.A.; Schönbeck, Y.; van der Kamp, H.J.; van den Akker, E.L.T.; van Albada, M.E.; Boelen, A.; Finken, M.J.J.; Hannema, S.E.; Hoorweg-Nijman, G.; Odink, R.J.; et al. Evaluation of the Dutch neonatal screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Arch. Dis. Child. 2019, 104, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frasier, S.D.; Thorneycroft, I.H.; Weiss, B.A.; Horton, R. Letter: Elevated amniotic fluid concentration of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Pediatr. 1975, 86, 310–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. New, M.I.; Tong, Y.K.; Yuen, T.; Jiang, P.; Pina, C.; Chan, K.C.; Khattab, A.; Liao, G.J.; Yau, M.; Kim, S.M.; et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, E1022–E1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Knorr, D.; Albert, E.D.; Bidlingmaier, F.; Höller, W.; Scholz, S. Different gene defects in the salt-wasting (SW), simple virilizing (SV), and nonclassical (NC) types of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1985, 458, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Held, P.K.; Bird, I.M.; Heather, N.L. Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Review of Factors Affecting Screening Accuracy. Int. J. Neonatal. Screen. 2020, 6, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Parsa, A.A.; New, M.I. Steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 165 Pt A, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carmina, E.; Dewailly, D.; Escobar-Morreale, H.F.; Kelestimur, F.; Moran, C.; Oberfield, S.; Witchel, S.F.; Azziz, R. Non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency revisited: An update with a special focus on adolescent and adult women. Hum. Reprod. Update 2017, 23, 580–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Spandri, A.; Cogliardi, A.; Maggi, P.; De Giorgi, A.; Masperi, R.; Beccaria, L. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2004, 76, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Nordenström, A.; Falhammar, H. Management of Endocrine Disease: Diagnosis and management of the patient with non-classic CAH due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 180, R127–R145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nermoen, I.; Rørvik, J.; Holmedal, S.H.; Hykkerud, D.L.; Fougner, K.J.; Svartberg, J.; Husebye, E.S.; Løvås, K. High frequency of adrenal myelolipomas and testicular adrenal rest tumours in adult Norwegian patients with classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia because of 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Clin. Endocrinol. 2011, 75, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nermoen, I.; Falhammar, H. Prevalence and Characteristics of Adrenal Tumors and Myelolipomas in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endocr. Pract. 2020, 26, 1351–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Calissendorff, J.; Juhlin, C.C.; Sundin, A.; Bancos, I.; Falhammar, H. Adrenal myelolipomas. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Campbell, M.J.; Obasi, M.; Wu, B.; Corwin, M.T.; Fananapazir, G. The radiographically diagnosed adrenal myelolipoma: What do we really know? Endocrine 2017, 58, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Reginelli, A.; Vacca, G.; Belfiore, M.; Sangiovanni, A.; Nardone, V.; Vanzulli, A.; Grassi, R.; Cappabianca, S. Pitfalls and differential diagnosis on adrenal lesions: Current concepts in CT/MR imaging: A narrative review. Gland Surg. 2020, 9, 2331–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dogra, P.; Sundin, A.; Juhlin, C.C.; Calissendorff, J.; Falhammar, H.; Bancos, I. Rare benign adrenal lesions. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2023, 188, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Daneshmand, S.; Quek, M.L. Adrenal myelolipoma: Diagnosis and management. Urol. J. 2006, 3, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Sharma, M.C.; Kashyap, S.; Sharma, R.; Chumber, S.; Sood, R.; Chahal, R. Symptomatic adrenal myelolipoma. Clinicopathological analysis of 7 cases and brief review of the literature. Urol. Int. 1997, 59, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bnaya, A.; Benjaminov, O.; Shavit, L. Bilateral extra-adrenal perirenal myelolipoma associated with obstructive uropathy. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 365, e10–e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hamidi, O.; Raman, R.; Lazik, N.; Iniguez-Ariza, N.; McKenzie, T.J.; Lyden, M.L.; Thompson, G.B.; Dy, B.M.; Young, W.F., Jr.; Bancos, I. Clinical course of adrenal myelolipoma: A long-term longitudinal follow-up study. Clin. Endocrinol. 2020, 93, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. McGeoch, S.C.; Olson, S.; Krukowski, Z.H.; Bevan, J.S. Giant bilateral myelolipomas in a man with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Auchus, R.J.; Arlt, W. Approach to the patient: The adult with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 2645–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Decmann, Á.; Perge, P.; Tóth, M.; Igaz, P. Adrenal myelolipoma: A comprehensive review. Endocrine 2018, 59, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramdani, A.; Aissaoui, A.; Bouhout, T.; Bennani, A.; Latrech, H.; Serji, B.; El Harroudi, T. Giant symptomatic adrenal myelolipoma: A case report. Ann. Med. Surg. 2022, 75, 103333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Finkielstain, G.P.; Kim, M.S.; Sinaii, N.; Nishitani, M.; Van Ryzin, C.; Hill, S.C.; Reynolds, J.C.; Hanna, R.M.; Merke, D.P. Clinical characteristics of a cohort of 244 patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 4429–4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schröder, M.A.M.; Claahsen-van der Grinten, H.L. Novel treatments for congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2022, 23, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Itonaga, T.; Hasegawa, Y. Monitoring treatment in pediatric patients with 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1102741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shariq, O.A.; McKenzie, T.J. Adrenocortical carcinoma: Current state of the art, ongoing controversies, and future directions in diagnosis and treatment. Ther. Adv. Chronic. Dis. 2021, 12, 20406223211033103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bancos, I.; Taylor, A.E.; Chortis, V.; Sitch, A.J.; Jenkinson, C.; Davidge-Pitts, C.J.; Lang, K.; Tsagarakis, S.; Macech, M.; Riester, A.; et al. Urine steroid metabolomics for the differential diagnosis of adrenal incidentalomas in the EURINE-ACT study: A prospective test validation study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Albano, D.; Agnello, F.; Midiri, F.; Pecoraro, G.; Bruno, A.; Alongi, P.; Toia, P.; Di Buono, G.; Agrusa, A.; Sconfienza, L.M.; et al. Imaging features of adrenal masses. Insights Imaging 2019, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Moran, C.; Azziz, R.; Carmina, E.; Dewailly, D.; Fruzzetti, F.; Ibañez, L.; Knochenhauer, E.S.; Marcondes, J.A.; Mendonca, B.B.; Pignatelli, D.; et al. 21-Hydroxylase-deficient nonclassic adrenal hyperplasia is a progressive disorder: A multicenter study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 183, 1468–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cera, G.; Locantore, P.; Novizio, R.; Maggio, E.; Ramunno, V.; Corsello, A.; Policola, C.; Concolino, P.; Paragliola, R.M.; Pontecorvi, A. Pregnancy and Prenatal Management of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. New, M.I.; Ghizzoni, L.; Meyer-Bahlburg, H.; Khattab, A.; Reichman, D.; Rosenwaks, Z. Fertility in patients with nonclassical congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 111, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Almeida, M.Q.; Kaupert, L.C.; Brito, L.P.; Lerario, A.M.; Mariani, B.M.; Ribeiro, M.; Monte, O.; Denes, F.T.; Mendonca, B.B.; Bachega, T.A. Increased expression of ACTH (MC2R) and androgen (AR) receptors in giant bilateral myelolipomas from patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2014, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Falhammar, H. Non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas caused by 21-hydroxylase deficiency or carrier status? Endocrine 2014, 47, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Libé, R.; Arlt, W.; Louiset, E.; Waintrop, C.; Guibourdenche, J.; Sibony, M.; Clauser, E.; Groussin, L. A feminizing adrenocortical carcinoma in the context of a late onset 21-hydroxylase deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 1943–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Falhammar, H.; Torpy, D.J. A 42-year-old man presented with adrenal incidentaloma due to non-classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia with a novel CYP21A2 mutation. Intern. Med. J. 2016, 46, 1115–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kocak, M.; Nuhoglu, I.; Mungan, S.; Duman, P.; Coskun, H.; Turkyılmaz, S. Bilateral adrenal myelolipomas secondary to congenital adrenal hyperplasia: A rare case of typical asymmetrical 18F-FDG avid. Acta Endocrinol. 2016, 12, 491–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Buitenwerf, E.; Links, T.P.; Kema, I.P.; Haadsma, M.L.; Kerstens, M.N. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia as a cause of adrenal incidentaloma. Neth. J. Med. 2017, 75, 298–300. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Feng, X.; Kline, G. Massive adrenal incidentalomas and late diagnosis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia in prostate cancer. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. Case Rep. 2017, 2017, 17–0108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hui, E.; Lee, A.C.; Lang, B.H.; Chan, A.O.; Lam, K.S.; Tan, K.C. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia presenting as a large adrenal incidentaloma in an elderly man. ANZ J. Surg. 2017, 87, 310–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Mallappa, A.; Millo, C.M.; Quezado, M.; Merke, D.P. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Presenting as an Adrenal Mass With Increased 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Uptake. J. Endocr. Soc. 2017, 1, 1110–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hirai, H.; Kuwana, K.; Kusano, Y. Late onset adrenal insufficiency after adrenalectomy due to latent nonclassical 21-hydroxylase deficiency: A case report. Medicine 2018, 97, e11888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Q.; Wang, L.A.; Su, J.; Tong, D.; Lan, W.; Wang, L.; Liu, G.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, V.W.; Zhang, D.; et al. Giant bilateral adrenal myelolipomas in two Chinese families with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Endocr. Connect. 2018, 7, 1136–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, H.J. Adrenal myelolipoma in association with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrine 2019, 63, 403–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Suchartlikitwong, S.; Jasti, R.; Lado-Abeal, J.; Rivas Mejia, A.M. Bilateral adrenal myelolipomas presenting as acute adrenal insufficiency in an adult with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. BMJ Case Rep. 2019, 12, e226826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Aveiro-Lavrador, M.; De Sousa Lages, A.; Barros, L.; Paiva, I. Late diagnosis of classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Long-term consequences during adulthood. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. Case Rep. 2021, 2021, 21–0032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. San Martín, P.; Eugenio Russmann, M.L.; Mendeluk, G.; Fierro, M.F.; Marino, R.; Pardes, E. Classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD) in adult males: Clinical presentation, hormone function and the detection of adrenal and testicular adrenal rest tumors (TARTs). Endocrinol. Diabetes Nutr. 2021, 68, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Burman, P.; Falhammar, H.; Waldenström, E.; Sundin, A.; Bitzén, U. 11C-Metomidate PET/CT Detected Multiple Ectopic Adrenal Rest Tumors in a Woman With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e675–e679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Robinson, D.A.; Kemeny, M.; Muchinyi, J.E.; Yasin, M.; Montes, N.I.; Tuli, S.; Jaiswal, R.; Carter, A.; Derezil, M.A.; Jang, H.; et al. Adrenal Myelolipoma Masquerading as an Adrenal Malignancy. Case Rep. Endocrinol. 2022, 2022, 4044602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tang, P.; Zhang, J.; Peng, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, D.; et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1095719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, S.J.; Song, J.E.; Hwang, S.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, H.S.; Han, S.; Rhee, Y. Untreated Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia with 17-α Hydroxylase/17,20-Lyase Deficiency Presenting as Massive Adrenocortical Tumor. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 30, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, F.; Zhao, Y.; Lv, J.; Sheng, X.; Wang, L. A new compound heterozygous mutation in a female with 17α-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase deficiency, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and adrenal myelolipoma. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 35, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chang, L.; Yu, D.; Wang, F. 17α-hydroxylase deficiency associated with adrenal myelolipoma. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2023, 133, 16369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ozbas, B.; Demir, M.; Dursun, H.; Sahin, I.; Hacioglu, A.; Karaca, Z.; Dundar, M.; Unluhizarci, K. Case Report: A Novel Mutation Leading to 11-β Hydroxylase Deficiency in a Female Patient. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Target 2023, 23, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ladjouze, A.; Donaldson, M.; Plotton, I.; Djenane, N.; Mohammedi, K.; Tardy-Guidollet, V.; Mallet, D.; Boulesnane, K.; Bouzerar, Z.; Morel, Y.; et al. Genotype, Mortality, Morbidity, and Outcomes of 3β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Deficiency in Algeria. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 867073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Al-Bahri, S.; Tariq, A.; Lowentritt, B.; Nasrallah, D.V. Giant bilateral adrenal myelolipoma with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Case Rep. Surg. 2014, 2014, 728198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Alvarez, J.F.; Goldstein, L.; Samreen, N.; Beegle, R.; Carter, C.; Shaw, A.; Ben-David, K. Giant adrenal myelolipoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2014, 18, 1716–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kale, G.; Pelley, E.M.; Davis, D.B. Giant myelolipomas and inadvertent bilateral adrenalectomy in classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. Case Rep. 2015, 2015, 150079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Altieri, V.M.; Altieri, B.; Castellucci, R.; Alba, S.; Bottone, F.; Fragalà, E.; Mirone, V.; Greco, F. Leydig cell tumour and giant adrenal myelolipoma associated with adrenogenital syndrome: A case report with a review of the literature. Urologia 2016, 83, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Meng, X.; Yu, Y. Non-classical 21-hydroxylase deficiency presented as Addison’s disease and bilateral adrenal incidentalomas. Acta Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Łebek-Szatańska, A.; Nowak, K.M.; Samsel, R.; Roszkowska-Purska, K.; Zgliczyński, W.; Papierska, L. Adrenocortical carcinoma associated with giant bilateral myelolipomas in classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 2019, 129, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Piskinpasa, H.; Ciftci Dogansen, S.; Kusku Cabuk, F.; Guzey, D.; Sahbaz, N.A.; Akdeniz, Y.S.; Mert, M. Bilateral adrenal and testicular mass in a patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Acta Endocrinol. 2019, 5, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lim, E.; Jeon, J.Y. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia presenting as pelvic inflammatory disease in a phenotypic male: A case report. Medicine 2020, 99, e18387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pakalniskis, M.G.; Ishigami, K.; Pakalniskis, B.L.; Fujita, N. Adrenal collision tumour comprised of adrenocortical carcinoma and myelolipoma in a patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2020, 64, 67–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Khalil, N.; Bizdikian, A.J.; Nasr, S.; Fakih, F.; Hajj, P. Suspicious adrenal incidentaloma in a patient with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: A case report. Urol. Case Rep. 2021, 36, 101569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kienitz, T.; Schwander, J.; Bogner, U.; Schwabe, M.; Steinmüller, T.; Quinkler, M. Giant bilateral adrenal lipoma in a patient with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. Case Rep. 2021, 2021, 20–0204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Vemula, B.R.; Olajide, O.B.; Adepoju, Y. Bilateral Adrenal Myelolipomas in a Female Patient With Undiagnosed Non-classic Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Cureus 2023, 15, e35017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Longoria-Dubocq, T.; Torres-Aguiar, R.; Ruiz-Vega, K.; De Ayala-Hillmann, R.; Lopez-Enriquez, R. A Rare Case of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia with Giant Adrenal Myelolipoma. Puerto Rico Health Sci. J. 2020, 39, 226–228. [Google Scholar]
  86. La, B.; Tung, C.; Choi, E.A.; Nguyen, H. A Gigantic Uterine Leiomyoma and Big Bilateral Adrenal Myelolipomas as a Result of Untreated Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. AACE Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 7, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lin, J.; Khoo, T.K.; Voelschow, E.R.; Viets, Z.J. Compliance Issues in Managing 21 Hydroxylase Deficiency and their Short/Long-Term Consequences. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2021, 8, 003048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jacobson, A.; Koberlein, E.; Thomay, A.; Lombard, C.B.; Adelanwa, A.; Lakhani, D.A.; Smith, K.T. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia with associated giant adrenal myelolipoma, testicular adrenal rest tumors and primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease: A case report and brief review of the literature. Radiol. Case Rep. 2021, 17, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Soveid, M.; Rais-Jalali, G.A. Seventeen Alpha-Hydroxylase Deficiency Associated with Absent Gonads and Myelolipoma: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Iran J. Med. Sci. 2016, 41, 543–547. [Google Scholar]
  90. Askitis, D.; Kloos, C.; Battefeld, W.; Müller, N.; Wolf, G.; Dirsch, O.; Müller, U.A. Complete evaluation of adrenal tumours in a tertiary care institution in Thuringia, Germany. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2015, 123, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kiedrowicz, B.; Binczak-Kuleta, A.; Lubikowski, J.; Koziolek, M.; Andrysiak-Mamos, E.; Ostanek-Panka, M.; Ciechanowicz, A.; Syrenicz, A. Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of CYP21A2 Gene Mutations in Patients with Nonfunctional Adrenal Incidentalomas. Horm. Metab. Res. 2015, 47, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Patrova, J.; Jarocka, I.; Wahrenberg, H.; Falhammar, H. Clinical outcomes in adrenal incidentaloma: Experience from one center. Endocr. Pract. 2015, 21, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kim, J.H.; Choi, J.H.; Kang, E.; Kim, Y.M.; Lee, B.H.; Yoo, H.W. Long-term Consequences of Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia due to Classic 21-hydroxylase Deficiency in Adolescents and Adults. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2017, 125, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Goh, Z.; Phillips, I.; Hunt, P.J.; Soule, S.; Cawood, T.J. Characteristics of adrenal incidentalomas in a New Zealand centre. Intern. Med. J. 2018, 48, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. El-Maouche, D.; Hannah-Shmouni, F.; Mallappa, A.; Hargreaves, C.J.; Avila, N.A.; Merke, D.P. Adrenal morphology and associated comorbidities in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Clin. Endocrinol. 2019, 91, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kim, T.M.; Kim, J.H.; Jang, H.N.; Choi, M.H.; Cho, J.Y.; Kim, S.Y. Adrenal Morphology as an Indicator of Long-Term Disease Control in Adults with Classic 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 37, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Sahlander, F.; Bensing, S.; Falhammar, H. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia is a very rare cause of adrenal incidentalomas in Sweden. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 1017303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Sahlander, F.; Patrova, J.; Mannheimer, B.; Lindh, J.D.; Falhammar, H. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia in patients with adrenal tumors: A population-based case-control study. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2023, 46, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jin, H.Y.; Choi, J.H.; Kim, D.Y.; Yoo, H.W. Adrenocortical Carcinoma in a Patient with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. J. Korean Soc. Pediatr. Endocrinol. 2010, 15, 193–197. [Google Scholar]
  100. Falhammar, H.; Thorén, M. An 88-year-old woman diagnosed with adrenal tumor and congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Connection or coincidence? J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2005, 28, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hao, M.; Lopez, D.; Luque-Fernandez, M.A.; Cote, K.; Newfield, J.; Connors, M.; Vaidya, A. The Lateralizing Asymmetry of Adrenal Adenomas. J. Endocr. Soc. 2018, 2, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kim, J.; Bae, K.H.; Choi, Y.K.; Jeong, J.Y.; Park, K.G.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, I.K. Clinical characteristics for 348 patients with adrenal incidentaloma. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 28, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Debono, M.; Bradburn, M.; Bull, M.; Harrison, B.; Ross, R.J.; Newell-Price, J. Cortisol as a marker for increased mortality in patients with incidental adrenocortical adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 4462–4470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Sangwaiya, M.J.; Boland, G.W.; Cronin, C.G.; Blake, M.A.; Halpern, E.F.; Hahn, P.F. Incidental adrenal lesions: Accuracy of characterization with contrast-enhanced washout multidetector CT--10-minute delayed imaging protocol revisited in a large patient cohort. Radiology 2010, 256, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gupta, P.; Bhalla, A.; Sharma, R. Bilateral adrenal lesions. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2012, 56, 636–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Khater, N.; Khauli, R. Myelolipomas and other fatty tumours of the adrenals. Arab. J. Urol. 2011, 9, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. AlSaffar, A.H.; AlEssa, A.M.; AlSharkawy, T.; Alamoudi, N.B.; Makhdom, F.A. Anterior Mediastinal Myelolipoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Am. J. Case Rep. 2022, 23, e936005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Fattahi, N.; Moeini, A.; Morani, A.C.; Elsayes, K.M.; Bhosale, H.R.; Badawy, M.; Menias, C.O.; Rezvani, M.; Gaballah, A.H.; Shaaban, A.M. Fat-containing pelvic lesions in females. Abdom. Radiol. 2022, 47, 362–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Anbardar, M.H.; Soleimani, N.; Nikeghbalian, S.; Mohebbi, M. Adrenocortical adenoma with myelolipomatous metaplasia: A potential diagnostic pitfall: A case report and review of the literature. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kenney, L.; Hughes, M. Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Role of Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2023, 32, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ławnicka, H. Current Prospects for Adrenocortical Carcinoma Pharmacotherapy. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2023, 18, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Mete, O.; Erickson, L.A.; Juhlin, C.C.; de Krijger, R.R.; Sasano, H.; Volante, M.; Papotti, M.G. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Adrenal Cortical Tumors. Endocr. Pathol. 2022, 33, 155–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Rowe, N.E.; Kumar, R.; Schieda, N.; Siddiqi, F.; McGregor, T.; McAlpine, K.; Violette, P.; Bathini, V.; Eng, M.; Izard, J. Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass: CUA Guideline Endorsed by the AUA. J. Urol. 2023, 210, 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dumitru, N.; Ghemigian, A.; Carsote, M.; Albu, S.E.; Terzea, D.; Valea, A. Thyroid nodules after initial evaluation by primary health care practitioners: An ultrasound pictorial essay. Arch. Balk. Med. Union. 2016, 51, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  115. Nistor, C.E.; Pantile, D.; Stanciu-Gavan, C.; Ciuche, A.; Moldovan, H. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Characteristics in Patients with Pneumotorax Associated with COVID-19 versus Non-COVID-19 Pneumotorax. Medicina 2022, 58, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Nistor, C.E.; Gavan, C.S.; Pantile, D.; Tanase, N.V.; Ciuche, A. Cervico-Thoracic Air Collections in COVID-19 Pneumonia Patients—Our Experience and Brief Review. Chirurgia 2022, 117, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Parazzoli, C.; Favero, V.; Aresta, C.; Morelli, V. Predicting morphological and functional variations of benign adrenal incidentalomas in relation to initial characteristics. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1179817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Trolle, C.; Fjeldborg, K.; Shukla, A.; Ebbehøj, A.; Poulsen, P.L.; Hansen, K.W. Adrenal incidentalomas and effectiveness of patient pathway transformation. Dan. Med. J. 2023, 70, A10220645. [Google Scholar]
  119. Okroj, D.; Rzepecka, A.; Kłosowski, P.; Babińska, A.; Sworczak, K. Review of Diagnostic Modalities for Adrenal Incidentaloma. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sconfienza, E.; Tetti, M.; Forestiero, V.; Veglio, F.; Mulatero, P.; Monticone, S. Prevalence of Functioning Adrenal Incidentalomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2023, 108, 1813–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ioannidis, O.; Papaemmanouil, S.; Chatzopoulos, S.; Paraskevas, G.; Konstantara, A.; Kotronis, A.; Kakoutis, E.; Makrantonakis, A. Giant bilateral symptomatic adrenal myelolipomas associated with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2011, 17, 775–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Conzo, G.; Tartaglia, E.; Gambardella, C.; Esposito, D.; Sciascia, V.; Mauriello, C.; Nunziata, A.; Siciliano, G.; Izzo, G.; Cavallo, F.; et al. Minimally invasive approach for adrenal lesions: Systematic review of laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy and assessment of risk factors for complications. Int. J. Surg. 2016, 28 (Suppl. S1), S118–S123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Conzo, G.; Pasquali, D.; Gambardella, C.; Della Pietra, C.; Esposito, D.; Napolitano, S.; Tartaglia, E.; Mauriello, C.; Thomas, G.; Pezzolla, A.; et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for Cushing disease. Int. J. Surg. 2014, 12 (Suppl. S1), S107–S111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Falhammar, H.; Torpy, D.J. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Due to 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Presenting as Adrenal Incidentaloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endocr. Pract. 2016, 22, 736–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Strategy of research—associated flowchart (n = number of articles). Approach of CAH—adrenal tumours connections. Abbreviations: CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; n = number of studies; AT = adrenal tumours; WGC = without a genetic confirmation; CYP21A2, CYP17A1, CYP11B1, HSD3B2 = enzymes/genes deficiencies; n = number of studies.
Figure 1. Strategy of research—associated flowchart (n = number of articles). Approach of CAH—adrenal tumours connections. Abbreviations: CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; n = number of studies; AT = adrenal tumours; WGC = without a genetic confirmation; CYP21A2, CYP17A1, CYP11B1, HSD3B2 = enzymes/genes deficiencies; n = number of studies.
Biomedicines 11 03081 g001
Figure 2. Case-sample analysis (n = 43 original papers, N = 59 patients; overall publication timeline between 2014 and 2023). Abbreviations: CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; N = number of patients; WGC = without a genetic confirmation.
Figure 2. Case-sample analysis (n = 43 original papers, N = 59 patients; overall publication timeline between 2014 and 2023). Abbreviations: CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; N = number of patients; WGC = without a genetic confirmation.
Biomedicines 11 03081 g002
Figure 3. Bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (red arrows) according to computed tomography exam on a prior unreported case of a 26-year-old female diagnosed with HSD3B2 deficiency and SV-CAH form (no tumour was suspected in this case since the imaging aspect is rather usual in this situation).
Figure 3. Bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (red arrows) according to computed tomography exam on a prior unreported case of a 26-year-old female diagnosed with HSD3B2 deficiency and SV-CAH form (no tumour was suspected in this case since the imaging aspect is rather usual in this situation).
Biomedicines 11 03081 g003
Table 1. Case reports (n = 13)/series (n = 5) with data regarding the clinical features of the patients diagnosed with CAH (CYP21A2 deficiency) and adrenal tumours/masses according to our strategy; the display starts with the earliest publication date within the decade of analysis [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
Table 1. Case reports (n = 13)/series (n = 5) with data regarding the clinical features of the patients diagnosed with CAH (CYP21A2 deficiency) and adrenal tumours/masses according to our strategy; the display starts with the earliest publication date within the decade of analysis [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
First Author/Reference/YearStudied Population/Age (Years)/GenderCAH FormAge at CAH Diagnosis (Years)Age at
Tumour
Diagnosis (Years)
Almeida [50] 2014N = 4 with ML (2/4 with SV-CAH)35/FSV<2035
52/FSVNA52
Falhammar [51] 2014N = 9 (5/9 with genetic confirmation)88/FNC8888
48/FNC4848
21/FNC2121
41/Fcarrier4141
67/MSV6767
Libé [52] 201477/MNC7777
Falhammar [53] 201642/MNC4242
Kocak [54] 201646/MNC4346
Buitenwerf [55] 201743/MSV4343
Feng [56] 201761/MSV6161
Hui [57] 201765/phenotypically male (46,XX karyotype)SV6565
Mallappa [58] 201729/FSV2929
Hirai [59] 201871/MNC7149
Liu [60] 2018N = 5 with ML59/MNC5946
his brotherNCNA50
Kim [61] 201964/MSV6456
Suchartlikitwong [62] 201939/M (46,XX karyotype)SV3939
Aveiro-Lavrador [63] 202137/MSV3735
San Martín [64] 2021N = 4 with adrenal tumours (out of 8 males with CAH)21/MSWNA21
23/MSV3 months23
28/MSV2828
Burman [65] 202131/FSWat birth28
Robinson [66] 202248/MSV4848
Tang [67] 2023N = 3 with CAH and 2 with adrenal tumours37/MNC3737
59/MNC5959
Abbreviations: CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; F = female; M = male; ML = myelolipomas; N = number of patients; NC = non-classical; NA = not available; SW = salt-wasting; SV = simple virilizing.
Table 2. Case reports/series introducing adrenal tumours identified in patients with genetically confirmed CYP21A2 deficiency according to our methods (the display starts with the earliest publication date) [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
Table 2. Case reports/series introducing adrenal tumours identified in patients with genetically confirmed CYP21A2 deficiency according to our methods (the display starts with the earliest publication date) [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
ReferenceTumour: Uni/Bilateral; Size (cm); Site (Left/Right)TypeClinical Presentation → Treatment
[50]BAT: 14 × 14 × 10 cm (L) + 8.9 × 8.3 × 8.0 cm (R)MLAbdominal pain → adrenalectomy
BAT: 16 × 13 × 9.0 cm (L) + 5.3 × 4.3 × 6.9 cm (R)MLAbdominal pain → adrenalectomy
[51]LAT: 3 × 4 × 5 cmIAbdominal pain, constipation → prednisolone 5 mg/day
two LAT: 1.3 × 1 cm + 1.4 × 1.5 cmICT performed due to pneumonia; oligomenorrhea (PCOS) → prednisolone 5 mg (when needed)
LAT: 1 cmIDiffuse abdominal discomfort (PCOS)→ patient declined any treatment
BAT: 1 cm (L) + 0.9 cm (R)IHirsutism, fertility issues (PCOS), abdominal discomfort → lifestyle changes (carrier)
RAT: 8 cmIAbdominal discomfort → right adrenalectomy (benign)
[52]LAT: 2 cm ACCGynecomastia → adrenalectomy (causality cannot be established) → ↗ post-operatory 17OHP
[53]LAT: 5.5 cm × 3.6 cm × 4.5 cmIAsymptomatic → hydrocortisone (at stress)
[54]BAT: 10.6 × 7.0 × 5.5 cm (L) + 8.1 × 4.2 x3.3 cm (R)MLPalpable mass → bilateral adrenalectomy
[55]LAT: 5.2 × 4.4 cmIFatigue and myalgia → dexamethasone 0.5 mg/day
[56]BAT: 18.2 × 16.2 × 14 cm (L) + 6.4 × 8.7 × 7.8 cm (R)MLShort stature, azoospermia, precocious puberty, increased testosterone in spite of anti-androgenic treatment for prostate cancer → glucocorticoid replacement
[57]RAT:5.8 × 3.9 × 4.5 cmHMALower urinary tract symptoms, empty scrotum, small penile length, short stature → right adrenalectomy (the patient also had small uterine-like structure, small ovaries and prostate)
[58]LAT: 10 × 7 cmMLHyperpigmentation, abdominal pain, kidney compression → left adrenalectomy
[59]LAT: 3–4 cmI (ACA)Left adrenalectomy at 49 years of age → adrenal insufficiency 22 years after adrenalectomy
[60]giant BAT (R > L)MLAbdominal pain → bilateral adrenalectomy → 1.56 kg (L) and 3.05 kg (R)
giant BATMLBilateral adrenalectomy
[61]LAT: 12.5 × 7.5 cm
RAT: diffuse nodular enlargement
MLAdrenal hyperplasia identified on CT, early puberty → left adrenalectomy at 56 years of age
[62]BAT: 2.3 × 1.4 × 2.5 cm (L) + 6 × 4.5 × 5cm (R)MLAdrenal insufficiency → glucocorticoid replacement
ML were diagnosed based on CT and MRI findings
[63]ML: 3 cm (R); ML: 2 cm (L)ML + EACAConsanguinity; personal history of precocious puberty, infertility, back pain → right adrenalectomy
[64]RAT: 0.6 cm × 1.2 cmNAThree patients had genetic testing, while one patient did not
LAT: 1.5 cm × 1.7 cmNANA
RAT: 4.9 cm × 3.4 cmI (ACA)Mass incidentally found during work-up for biliary colic → surgery
[65]BAT: 11 cm (R) + 11 × 8.5 × 13 cm (L)MLRAT growth → right adrenalectomy → left adrenalectomy after 7 years
[66]BAT: 8.4 × 6.2 × 7.5 cm (L) +
1.6 × 2 × 2.5 cm + 1.7 × 1.5 × 1.8 cm (R)
I (ML)Short stature → left adrenalectomy and distal pancreatectomy →
hydrocortisone therapy
[67]RAT: 4.3 × 3.7 cmAHAzoospermia, small testes, hypospadias, premature pubarche, short stature → replacement therapy (the patient also had secondary hypogonadotropic hypogonadism)
BAT: 20 × 25 cm (L) and 30 × 40 cm (R)MLAbdominal distension, surgical resection → glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid replacement (the patient’s brother also underwent surgery for bilateral giant MLs at the age of 50)
Abbreviations: ACA = adrenocortical adenoma; ACC = adrenocortical carcinoma; AH = adenomatous hyperplasia; BAT = bilateral adrenal tumour; CT = computed tomography; EACA = ectopic adrenocortical adenoma; HMA = hyperplasia with mild atypia; I = incidentaloma; LAT = left adrenal tumours; L = left; ML = myelolipoma; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; NA = not available; PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome; RAT = right adrenal tumour; R = right; ↗ = increase.
Table 3. Gene testing results in case reports/series confirmed with CYP21A2 deficiency and adrenal tumours/masses (the display starts with the earliest publication date) [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
Table 3. Gene testing results in case reports/series confirmed with CYP21A2 deficiency and adrenal tumours/masses (the display starts with the earliest publication date) [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
ReferenceGenetic Testing Results
[50]Compound heterozygote p.E351V, p.I236N, p.V237E, and p.M239K genetic variants in the CYP21A2 gene
IVS2-13A/C>G/p.I172N
[51]V281L and I172N
V281L
V281L/V281L
I172N
I172N/deletion
[52]Biallelic micro-conversion between the promoter regions of CYP21A2 and the pseudogene CYP21A1
[53]Compound heterozygous genetic variants: Pro30Leu genetic variant on one allele and a novel heterozygous duplication (c.264_276dup (p.Glu93Cysfs*5)) on the second allele
[54]Homozygous g.656A/C>G point genetic variant
[55]Compound heterozygous genetic variants: c.518T>A (p.Ile173Asn) and c.710T>A, c.713T>A, c.719T>A (p.lIe237Asn), (p.Val238Glu), (p.Met240Lys)
[56]Complete gene deletion on one allele and a C518T>A (I172N) genetic variant on the other
[57]Compound heterozygous p.Ile172Asn, p.Arg483Pro, and p.Met485Trpfs*56 genetic variants
[58]Heterozygosity for intron 2 IVS2-13A/C>G splice site genetic variant/p.R483P (c.1451_1452 deletion insertion of C)
[59]Micro genetic variant I172N and heterozygous large gene deletion or conversion
[60]Compound heterozygous genetic variant: c.293-13C>G and c.518T>A, p.I173N
Compound heterozygous genetic variant: c.293-13C>G and c.518T>A, p.I173N
[61]IVS2-13A/C>G and p.I173N
[62]Compound heterozygous R356W and intron 2G genetic variant
[63]Variant g.655C>G
[64]Heterozygosity: p.Gln318Ter (Q318) and p.Gly110ValfsTer21 (Del8bpE3)
Homozygous genetic variant c.293-13C>G
p.Ile172Asn (p I172N) and Del/Conv
[65]Gln318stop/deletion in the CYP21A2 gene
[66]c.293–13C>G genetic variant on both alleles
[67]Compound heterozygous genetic variant c.293-13C>G and c.518T>A, p.I173N
Compound heterozygous genetic variant c.293-13C>G and c.518T>A, p.I173N
Table 4. Data regarding tumour size and hormonal findings at presentation in patients with genetically confirmed CYP21A2 deficiency [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
Table 4. Data regarding tumour size and hormonal findings at presentation in patients with genetically confirmed CYP21A2 deficiency [50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
ReferenceTumour Size (cm)Hormonal Panel at Presentation for Adrenal Tumour
ACTH17-hydroxyprogesteroneOther Hormonal Assays or Observations
(pg/mL)(ng/mL or nmol/L)
[50]>101172192 ng/mLTestosterone = 949 ng/dL; Androstendione = 17 ng/mL
>10NA120 ng/mLTestosterone = 720 ng/dL; Androstendione = 39 ng/mL
[51]5–10NANALate diagnosis
<5NA37 nmol/L
<5NA32 nmol/L
<5NA11.1 nmol/L
5–10NA338 nmol/L
[52]<5NA42 nmol/LLate diagnosis
[53]5–10normal51 nmol/LPatient received diagnosis after incidentaloma was discovered
[54]>1021428.6 ng/mLDHEA-S = 29 (N:80-560) μg/dL
[55]5–1027426 nmol/LTestosterone = 13 nmol/L; Androstendione = 14 nmol/L
[56]>10NANALate diagnosis
[57]5–10NAmarkedly raisedTestosterone normal (late diagnosis)
[58]5–10NA17,900 ng/dL Late diagnosis
[59]<518209.4 ng/mLTestosterone = 3.26 ng/mL; Androstendione = 1.15 ng/mL
Late diagnosis, poor compliance with treatment
[61]>10157.627,500 ng/dLLate diagnosis
[62]5–1010,4452003 ng/dL Late diagnosis
[63]<5135157 ng/mLTestosterone = 0.7 ng/mL; Androstenedione = 4.5 µg/mL; late diagnosis
[64]<5NANA
<5NANAIrregular adherence to treatment during childhood
<5NANA
[65]>103269 nmol/LAndrostenedione and 17-hydroxyprogesterone with fluctuant pattern
[66]5–101606078 ng/dLTestosterone = 447.0 ng/dL; DHEA-S = 598 ug/dL; late diagnosis
[67]<51131485.20 nmol/L Testosterone = 4.05 (normal: 1.75–7.81) ng/mL; DHEA = 7.99 ng/mL; late diagnosis
>10NANALate diagnosis
Abbreviations: ACTH = Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; DHEA-S = dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate; NA = not available.
Table 5. Clinical and tumour features and associated outcome in patients with CYP17A1 deficiency; the display starts with the earliest publication date between 2015 and 2023, according to our methods [60,68,69,70].
Table 5. Clinical and tumour features and associated outcome in patients with CYP17A1 deficiency; the display starts with the earliest publication date between 2015 and 2023, according to our methods [60,68,69,70].
First Author/Reference/YearPatient
Age/Gender
Genetic Testing
(CYP17A1 Deficiency)
Age at CAH
Diagnosis
/Tumour
Diagnosis (Years)
Tumour
Features
Clinical
Features
Therapy
Lee [68] 201536/F Compound heterozygous genetic variant for p.Tyr329fs (c.985_987delTACinsAA) + missense genetic variant p.His373Leu (c.1118A > T)36/3610 × 6.3 × 8.6 cm
Adrenal cortical adenoma
Abdominal pain
Tanner 1
Left adrenalectomy
Liu [60] 2018 Patient 3:
36/F
Compound heterozygous genetic variant: c.1118A>T, p.H373L, and c.1459_1467del9, p.D487_F489del36/36Giant bilateral adrenal masses, the largest (left) of 20 cm × 15 cm × 10 cm
Myelolipoma
Headaches,
hypokalaemia since childhood,
+hypertension (prior 6 years)
Left and right adrenalectomies
Patient 4:
32/F
Compound heterozygous genetic variant: c.1118A>T, p.H373L, and c.1459_1467del9, p.D487_F489del32/32MyelolipomaFatigue, hypokalaemiaLeft adrenalectomy
Patient 5:
37/F
Compound heterozygous genetic variant: c.1118A>T, p.H373L, and c.1459_1467del9, p.D487_F489del37/37MyelolipomaHypertension, hypokalaemia (3 years prior)Left and right adrenalectomies
Yang [69] 201927/F
(46,XX karyotype)
Compound heterozygous genetic variant: c.985_987delTACinsAA (p.Tyr329fs) in exon 6 (frame-shift genetic variant) and c.1270C>T (p.Gln424) in exon 8 (nonsense genetic variant)27/27MyelolipomaPersistent hypokalaemia, primary amenorrhoeaDexamethasone 0.75 mg/day
Chang [70] 202331/F
(46,XY karyotype)
Heterozygous variant of c.985_987delinsAA (p.Y329Kfs*90) and p.R96W genetic variant31/31Left adrenal mass of 5 × 9 cm
myelolipoma
Hypokalaemia, hypertension, primary amenorrhea, hypoplastic breasts, vaginal infantilism, lack of axillary and pubic hairSurgical treatment of the adrenal myelolipoma and resection of gonads
Abbreviations: F = female; NA = not available.
Table 6. Clinical and tumour characteristics in reports with CYP11B1 and HSD3B2 defects [71,72].
Table 6. Clinical and tumour characteristics in reports with CYP11B1 and HSD3B2 defects [71,72].
First Author
Reference
Number Year of Publication
Type of StudyPatientGene-Enzyme Deficiency Gene TestingAge at CAH Diagnosis (Years)Age at
Tumour
Diagnosis (Years)
Ozbas [71] 2023Case report35-year-old female (C1)CYP11B1Homozygous missense genetic variant (c.1385T >C L462P variant (NM_000497.3)3535
Ladjouze [72] 2022Mixed longitudinal and cross-sectional study14 patients from 10 families with HSD3B2 deficiency16-year-old female (C2)HSD3B2p.(Pro222GIn)14 days16
13-year-old female (C3)HSD3B2p.(Thr152_Pro155del)3 months13
15-year-old female (C4)HSD3B2p.(Thr152_Pro155del)4 weeks15
Tumour features and outcome
ReferencePatientTumour sizePathological reportClinical presentationSurgeryObservations
[71]C1Left adrenal mass of 7.4 × 5.5 cmMyelolipomaHypertension, adrenal mass, clitoromegaly, deep voice, hirsutism, hypokalaemia history of 2 genital reconstruction during childhoodLeft adrenalectomyThe patient was prescribed glucocorticoids during childhood, but did not follow it regularly (for the previous 5 years the patient did not take glucocorticoids)
[72]C2Right adrenal mass of 2.7 × 3 cmAdrenocortical hyperplasiaNAAdrenalectomyInitially, misdiagnosed as 21OHD mass had high suspicion of malignancy (unconfirmed)
C3 *Left adrenal mass of 6.3 × 5.2 × 5.1 cmAdrenocortical hyperplasiaNAAdrenalectomy
Abbreviations: C = case; NA = not available, 21OHD = 21-hydroxylase deficiency (* data on C4 were not specifically addressed).
Table 7. Hormonal panel according to the cases reported with CYP17A1, CYP11B1, and HSD3B2 deficiency at the moment of the adrenal tumour confirmation [61,68,69,70,71,72].
Table 7. Hormonal panel according to the cases reported with CYP17A1, CYP11B1, and HSD3B2 deficiency at the moment of the adrenal tumour confirmation [61,68,69,70,71,72].
ReferenceHormonal Panel at Presentation for Adrenal Tumour
ACTHPlasma CortisolOther Parameters
[68]75.94 (normal: 7.2 to 63.6) pg/mLNANa = 141 (normal: 135 to 145) mmol/L
K = 3.3 (normal: 3.5 to 5.5) mmol/L
Renin = 0.80 (normal: 1.31 to 3.95) ng/mL/hr
Aldosterone = 183.31 (normal: 29.9 to 158.8) pg/mL
Aldosterone to renin ratio = 22.9
[60]>1250 pg/mL (↗)<2 μg/dL (↘) Hypokalaemia
271 pg/mL (↗)<2 μg/dL (↘)Hypokalaemia
503 pg/mL (↗)<3.1 μg/dL (↘)Hypokalaemia
[69]41.56 (normal: 0–40) pg/mL171.39 (normal: 268.94–579.39) nmol/LHypokalaemia (K = 2.1 mmol/L)
17OHP < 0.05 (0.05–1.02) ng/mL
[70]225.80 (normal: 7.20–63.30) pg/mL0.1 (normal: 50–250) ng/mLHypokalaemia (K = 2.10 mmol/L, normal = 3.50–5.30) mmol/L
Plasma renin activity = 0.91 (normal: 4–38) pg/mL
Aldosterone = 76.78 (normal: 40–310) pg/mL
Estradiol = 1.4 (normal: 15–350) pg/mL
Testosterone = 10.4 (normal: 80–600) pg/mL
DHEA-S = 0.9 (normal: 830–3770) ng/mL
[71]279 (normal: 0–246) pg/mL4.8 (normal: 6.2–18) μg/dLK = 2.7 mmol/L, Na = 140 mmol/L
Androstenedione>10 (normal: 0.3–3.3) ng/dL
Total testosterone = 236 (normal: 6–82) ng/dL
17OHP = 8.31 (normal: 0.2–1) ng/dL
[72] NANA17OHP = 2.14 (normal: 0.48–1.87) nmol/L
17OHPreg = 93 (normal: 0.13–13.7) nmol/L (one patient)
Abbreviations: DHEA-S = dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate; K = potassium; Na = sodium; 170HP = 17-hydroxyprogesterone; 170HPreg = 17-hydroxypregnenolone; NA = not available; ↘ = decrease; ↗ = increase.
Table 8. General characteristics of the patients confirmed with CAH according to the hormonal panel (but not genetic testing confirmation) and of the adrenal tumours according to the mentioned methods [51,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
Table 8. General characteristics of the patients confirmed with CAH according to the hormonal panel (but not genetic testing confirmation) and of the adrenal tumours according to the mentioned methods [51,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
First Author/ReferencePopulationCAH FormMethod of CAH
Diagnosis
Age at CAH DiagnosisAge at Tumour Diagnosis
Al-Bahri [73] 39-year-old maleNAUnclearChildhood39
Alvarez [74]44-year-old femaleSVVirilizing CAHInfancy/childhood44
Kale [75]51-year-old maleSWNAInfancy51
Altieri [76]42-year-old maleSVPrecocious puberty4 years42
Meng [77]40-year-old maleNCHormonal work-up4031
Łebek-Szatańska [78]32-year-old maleSWSalt waste Neonate30
Piskinpasa [79]41-year-old maleSVACTH stimulation test4141
Lim [80]58-year-old maleSVHormonal + ACTH stimulation test5858
Pakalniskis [81]61-year-old maleSVNANA (known CAH)61
Khalil [82]27-year-old phenotypic male, 46,XX karyotypeSVNALate childhood27
Kienitz [83]50-year-old maleSWSalt wasteChildhood50
San Martín [65]42-year-old maleSV Infancy42
Falhammar [51]56-year-old maleNCACTH stimulation test5656
66-year-old maleNCACTH stimulation test6666
48-year-old femaleNCACTH stimulation test4848
53-year-old femalecarrierACTH stimulation test5353
Vemula [84]68-year-old femaleNCClinically and biochemically6868
Longoria-Dubocq [85]36-year-old maleNANANA (known CAH)36
La [86]37-year-old born female with ambiguous genitalia identifying as maleSWSalt wasteNeonate27
Lin [87]36-year-old maleSW At birth36
Jacobson [88]49-year-old maleSWSalt wasteInfancy49
Soveid [89]26-year-old female, XY karyotype Hormonal work-up following hypertension diagnosis2626
Abbreviations: ACTH = Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; NA = not available; NC = non-classical; SV = simple virilizing; SW = salt-wasting.
Table 9. Adrenal tumour panel, clinical presentation, and hormonal profile at the moment of tumour identification in patients diagnosed with CAH (with no genetic confirmation) [51,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
Table 9. Adrenal tumour panel, clinical presentation, and hormonal profile at the moment of tumour identification in patients diagnosed with CAH (with no genetic confirmation) [51,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89].
Reference/
Age/Sex/
Enzyme
Defect/
CAH Form
Tumour → Decision of Surgery (If Any)Clinical PictureHormonal Panel at the Moment of Tumour
Evaluation + Other Highlights
[73]
39/M
CYP21A2
NA
BAT: 20 × 20 × 25 cm (L) + 16 × 12 × 15 cm (R) → ↗ size despite therapy → bilateral adrenalectomyAbdominal distension,
discomfort
ACTH = 42 (normal:6–50) pg/mL
17OHPg = 14,076 (normal: 42–196) ng/dL
Testosterone = 506 (normal: 241–827) ng/dL
[74]
44/F
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
26 × 24 × 9.5 cm (L) → surgery (exploratory laparotomy and mass excision)Abdominal distension, nausea,
vomiting
NA
[75]
51/M
CYP21A2
SW-CAH
BAT: 31.1 × 18.1 × 16.1 cm (L) + 13.7 × 6.6 × 10.6 cm (R) → bilateral adrenalectomyChronic back pain, lower limbs parasthesiasisThe patient was under long-term supra physiological glucocorticoid replacement, without biochemical monitoring
[76]
42/M
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
BAT: 16 × 13 × 9.0 cm (L) + 5.3 × 4.3 × 6.9 cm (R) → left adrenalectomyRecurrent abdominal pain, digestive symptoms Despite right tumour growth, the patient remained asymptomatic and denied a second surgical intervention
[77]
40/M
CYP21A2
NC-CAH
5 × 4 cm (R)
4.1 × 3.9 cm (L) (diagnosis: 9 years after right adrenalectomy)
Adrenal insufficiency after initial right adrenalectomyACTH > 2000 (normal: 5.0–78) pg/mL
17OHPg = 21.13 (normal: 0.31–2.01) ng/mL
Testosterone = 1.81 (normal: 2.49–8.36) ng/mL
Cortisol = 157.8 (normal: 147.3–609.3) nmol/L
[78]
32/M
CYP21A2
SW-CAH
BAT: 6.7 × 4.8 × 2.7 cm (R) + 19.8 × 19.1 × 12 cm (L) → left adrenalectomy → adrenal carcinoma → mitotane (The patient was awaiting for the right adrenalectomy)Rapidly enlarging BATNA
[79]
41/M
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
BAT: 4.1 × 2.2 cm (L) + 8.8 × 5.5 cm (R) (incidentally detected during follow-up of testes tumours) → right adrenalectomy → myelolipomaIncidental imaging diagnosis ACTH = 80.4 (normal: 9–46) pg/mL
17OHPg = 14 (normal: 0.2–2.3) ng/mL
Testosterone = 1.79 (normal: 2.18–9.06) ng/mL
Cortisol = 3.75 (normal: 6.2–19.4) μg/dL
[80]
58/M
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
10 cm (L) → planned surgery ACTH = 181 (normal: 0–60) pg/mL
17OHPg = 13,800 (normal: 20–172) ng/dL
Testosterone = 6.75 (normal: 2.5–10.63) ng/mL
Cortisol = 8.6 (normal: 9.4–26.1) μg/dL
[81]
61/M
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
10.3 cm (R) with calcifications + 2.9 cm (L) suggestive of myelolipoma → right adrenalectomyPressor-dependent shockHigh ACTH
High 17OHPg
The patient had Mullerian structures (prior known with pseudo hermaphroditism
[82]
27/M *
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
9 × 8 × 7 cm (L) with calcifications and central necrosis measuring (of 5.5 cm) → left adrenalectomyIncidentaloma on abdominal ultrasound Normal ACTH
High 17OHPg
[83]
50/M
CYP21A2
SW-CAH
BAT with septic lobular appearance of 10 × 11 × 6 cm (L) + 14 × 19 × 11 cm (R) → right adrenalectomyPolakidisuriaACTH = 37.5 (normal: 1.6–45) pg/mL
17OHPg = 0.6 to 1.5 (normal: 0.2–1.4) ng/mL
Testosterone = 1.7(normal:1.3–7.7) ng/mL
Cortisol = 0.24 to 0.5 (normal: 0.5–3.5 ng/mL)
[64]
42/M
CYP21A2
SV-CAH
Bilateral thickening with left predominance <1.3 cm NA
[51]
56/M
CYP21A2
NC-CAH
BAT: 1.2 cm (L) + 0.9 cm (R)Abdominal pain17OHPg = 14 nmol/L
[51]
66/M
CYP21A2
NC-CAH
BAT of 1.5 cm the largest 17OHPg = 3.4 nmol/L
[51]
48/F
CYP21A2
NC-CAH
BAT: 1.5 × 2 cm (L) + “minor” tumours (R)Abdominal discomfort17OHPg = 6.9 nmol/L
[51]
53/F
CYP21A2
carrier
BAT: 3.3 × 3 cm (L) + 1.3 × 3.3 (R)Abdominal pain17OHPg = 2.3 nmol/L
[84]
68/F
CYP21A2
NC-CAH
BAT: 6.6 × 9.7 × 10.5 cm (L) + 3 × 7.6 × 6.8 cm (right) → myelolipoma diagnosis was based on CT findingsChest discomfort, virilization, hirsutism, excessive labial foldsACTH = 266.7 (normal: 7.2–63.3) pg/mL
17OHPg = 25,018 (normal: 15–70) ng/dL
Testosterone = 1195 (normal: 60–80) ng/mL
Cortisol ** = 2.8 (normal: <1.8) µg/dL
[85]
36/M
NA
NA
left retroperitoneal mass of 30 × 23.6 × 16.7 cm → tumour developed despite of adequate CAH management → tumour resectionAbdominal pain, difficulty breathingNA
[86]
37/ ***
NA
SW-CAH
BAT: 11.8 × 8.8 cm (L) + 5.9 × 2.4 cm (R) → bilateral adrenalectomy & hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomyAbdominal distension, hypotension, virilizationACTH = 166 (normal: 6–50) pg/mL
17OHPg = 4356 (normal: 285) ng/dL
Testosterone = 737 (normal: 2–45) ng/dL
Cortisol = 78.5 (normal: 3.7–19.4) mg/dL
[87]
36/M
NA
SW-CAH
Adrenal mass of 23 cm (L) + adrenal nodule of 2.5 cm (R) → the tumours were incidentally found → adrenalectomy → glucocorticoid/mineralocorticoid treatment Admission for dyspnoea (pulmonary embolism)ACTH = 128 (normal: 6–50) pg/mL
17OHPg = 17,300 ng/dL
Myelolipoma was diagnosed based on CT findings
[88]
39/M
NA
SW-CAH
BAT: 18 × 13.4 × 12cm (L) + 7.3 × 2.7 × 5.8 cm (R) → bilateral adrenalectomy due to abdominal painSalt craving, hyperpigmentation, small testes, abdominal pain17OHPg = 8230 (normal < 220) ng/dL
[89]
26/F ****
CYP17A1
hypertension
BAT: 6.5 cm (L) + 3 cm (R) → left adrenalectomy due to asymmetric enlargement and abdominal painHypertension, Tanner 1ACTH = 185 (normal: 6–76) pg/mL
17OHPg < 10 (normal: 20–100) ng/dL
Testosterone = <0.02 (normal: 0.084–0.481) ng/mL
Cortisol = 0.9 (normal: 5.4–28.7) μg/dL
Abbreviations: ACTH = Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; 17OHPg = 17-hydroxyprogesterone; BAT = bilateral adrenal tumours; CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; CT = computed tomography; F = female; L = left; NA = not available; NC = non-classical; M = male; R = right; SV = simple virilizing; SW = salt-wasting (of note, “cortisol” means plasma morning cortisol); * = phenotypically male + 46,XX karyotype; **after 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test; *** born female with ambiguous genitalia identifying as male; **** phenotypically female + 46,XY karyotype.
Table 10. Prevalence studies of CAH among patients with adrenal tumours/incidentalomas or adrenal tumours amid CAH diagnosis; the display starts with the earliest publication date we could identify according to our strategy (between 2015 and 2023) [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
Table 10. Prevalence studies of CAH among patients with adrenal tumours/incidentalomas or adrenal tumours amid CAH diagnosis; the display starts with the earliest publication date we could identify according to our strategy (between 2015 and 2023) [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
First Author
Reference
Number/Year
Study
Design
Study PopulationResults
Askitis
[90]
2015
Retrospective 187 patients with adrenal tumours, including 49-year-old male patient with CAHPrevalence of CAH among adrenal tumours: 0.53%
Kiedrowicz
[91]
2015
Retrospective100 patients with AI, out of whom 8 had CAHPrevalence of CAH genetic variants among AIs: 0.8%
Patrova
[92]
2015
Retrospective637 patients with AI, out of whom 2 had CAHPrevalence of CAH among AIs: 0.3%
Kim
[93]
2017
Retrospective53 patients with CAH due to CYP21A2 deficiencyLong-term consequences of CAH due to CYP21A2 deficiency: prevalence of adrenal tumours among CAH: 0.9%
Goh
[94]
2018
Prospective228 patients with AI, out of whom 4 had CAHPrevalence of CAH genetic variants among AIs: 1.8%
El-Maouche
[95]
2019
Retrospective 88 patients with CAHMyelolipoma prevalence among CAH:12.5%
Kim
[96]
2022
Retrospective 90 adults with 21OHD and 270 healthy controlsCAH control and adrenal morphology → prevalence of adrenal tumour among CAH/21OHD: 13.3%
Sahlander
[97]
2022
Prospective320 individuals with AI, out of whom 8 had CAHPrevalence of CAH among patients with adrenal incidentalomas: 3.6%
Sahlander
[98]
2023
Retrospective (register-based)26,573 individuals with adrenal tumours, out of whom 20 had CAH and 144,124 controls without adrenal tumours, out of whom 1 had CAHPrevalence of CAH among patients with adrenal tumours: 0.75‰
Sahlander
[98]
2023
Retrospective (register-based)26,573 individuals with adrenal tumours, out of whom 20 had CAH and 144,124 controls without adrenal tumours, out of whom 1 had CAHPrevalence of CAH among patients with adrenal tumours: 0.75‰
Abbreviations: AI = adrenal incidentaloma; CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia; 21OHD = 21-hydroxylase.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carsote, M.; Gheorghe, A.-M.; Nistor, C.; Trandafir, A.-I.; Sima, O.-C.; Cucu, A.-P.; Ciuche, A.; Petrova, E.; Ghemigian, A. Landscape of Adrenal Tumours in Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113081

AMA Style

Carsote M, Gheorghe A-M, Nistor C, Trandafir A-I, Sima O-C, Cucu A-P, Ciuche A, Petrova E, Ghemigian A. Landscape of Adrenal Tumours in Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(11):3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carsote, Mara, Ana-Maria Gheorghe, Claudiu Nistor, Alexandra-Ioana Trandafir, Oana-Claudia Sima, Anca-Pati Cucu, Adrian Ciuche, Eugenia Petrova, and Adina Ghemigian. 2023. "Landscape of Adrenal Tumours in Patients with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia" Biomedicines 11, no. 11: 3081. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11113081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop