Next Article in Journal
Durability of Slippery Liquid-Infused Surfaces: Challenges and Advances
Next Article in Special Issue
Annealing and Doping Effects on Transition Metal Dichalcogenides—Based Devices: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Orthorhombic YBa2Cu3O7−δ Superconductor with TiO2 Nanoparticle Addition: Crystal Structure, Electric Resistivity, and AC Susceptibility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Al2O3 Ceramic/Nanocellulose-Coated Non-Woven Separator for Lithium-Metal Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copper Nitride: A Versatile Semiconductor with Great Potential for Next-Generation Photovoltaics

1
Energy Department, Center for Energy, Environmental and Technological Research (CIEMAT), Av. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Departament de Física Aplicada, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
3
Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2UB), Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
4
National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, Av. Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
5
Technology Support Center (CAT), University Rey Juan Carlos, Tulipán, s/n, Móstoles, 28039 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(6), 1094; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13061094
Submission received: 26 May 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 13 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials for Energy Storage and Conversion)

Abstract

:
Copper nitride (Cu3N) has gained significant attention recently due to its potential in several scientific and technological applications. This study focuses on using Cu3N as a solar absorber in photovoltaic technology. Cu3N thin films were deposited on glass substrates and silicon wafers via radio-frequency magnetron sputtering at different nitrogen flow ratios with total pressures ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 Pa. The thin films’ structural, morphology, and chemical properties were determined using XRD, Raman, AFM, and SEM/EDS techniques. The results revealed that the Cu3N films exhibited a polycrystalline structure, with the preferred orientation varying from 100 to 111 depending on the working pressure employed. Raman spectroscopy confirmed the presence of Cu-N bonds in characteristic peaks observed in the 618–627 cm−1 range, while SEM and AFM images confirmed the presence of uniform and smooth surface morphologies. The optical properties of the films were investigated using UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy and photothermal deflection spectroscopy (PDS). The obtained band gap, refractive index, and Urbach energy values demonstrated promising optical properties for Cu3N films, indicating their potential as solar absorbers in photovoltaic technology. This study highlights the favourable properties of Cu3N films deposited using the RF sputtering method, paving the way for their implementation in thin-film photovoltaic technologies. These findings contribute to the progress and optimisation of Cu3N-based materials for efficient solar energy conversion.

1. Introduction

Copper nitride (Cu3N) is a compound that has attracted increasing attention in recent years due to its unique properties and potential applications in several fields [1], as shown in Figure 1.
Regarding its crystal structure, Cu3N is a binary compound made up of copper (Cu) and nitrogen (N) that displays a cubic anti-ReO3 crystal system (space group Pm3m). The bond angle of Cu-N-Cu reported is approximately 180 degrees, and the lattice parameter and density are 3.817 Å and 6.1 g/cm3, respectively [2]. This material is metastable and exhibits thermal stability close to 250 °C [3]. Cu3N displays insulator-to-conductor transition behaviour, with electrical conductivity values ranging between 10−3 and 10−2 Scm−1 [4]. Moreover, the electrical properties of the Cu3N films can be modified by doping them with metal or non-metal elements such as fluorine or gold, resulting in either p-type or n-type behaviour [5,6]. To switch between these electric characters, doping concentration, synthesis conditions, surface modifications, and interface engineering can be adjusted to alter charge carriers, crystal structure, defect density, and electrical properties. By controlling these factors, copper nitride’s resistivity can be fine tuned to achieve the desired conductivity [7,8,9]. This approach can potentially enhance and broaden the scope of applications for Cu3N films. As a result, it is a promising candidate for future technological advancements, developments, and innovations in various fields, including electronic devices such as thin-film transistors (TFTs) and complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) circuits [10].
Additionally, Cu3N has been investigated as a potential material for energy storage applications, such as batteries and other energy storage devices, due to its thermal stability and chemical stability [11]. Recent works have reported that Cu3N can be used as an electrode material in lithium-ion batteries, exhibiting excellent performance in capacity and cycle stability [12]. Moreover, copper nitride has demonstrated high electrochemical and catalytic activity for various important reactions, making it a promising material for numerous applications [13,14,15].
From the optical point of view, experimental studies have shown that this material has indirect and direct band gap values ranging from 1.17 to 1.69 eV and 1.72 to 2.38 eV, respectively [16,17]. Considering these values, Cu3N can be considered a promising light absorber material for solar cells. Its crystal structure and chemical composition can be optimised by controlling the technical parameters during preparation, resulting in an optimised optical bandgap and maximum photovoltaic voltage [4,18,19]. By developing p-type and n-type Cu3N (100) thin films via different technologies and adjusting the Cu/N chemical composition via reasonable control methods, bipolar doping can be added under Cu defects, leading to materials ready for photovoltaic applications thanks to their excellent indirect bandgap values. This approach can significantly increase the conversion efficiency of solar energy [4,20].
There are several chemical and physical methods to prepare copper nitride films. Among the chemical fabrication techniques, chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and atomic layer deposition (ALD) are commonly used to fabricate it in a gas phase. These methods involve the use of precursors such as Cu(hfac)2 and [Cu(sBu-Me-amd)]2 [21] to determine its resulting phase composition and morphology and to establish the growth rate [22,23]. Ammonolysis reactions can also be used to prepare bulk Cu3N powder samples [24], as well as thin films [25]. In addition, recent works have shown that Cu3N nanowire arrays can be synthesised by an ammonolysis reaction from copper (II) oxide precursors grown on copper surfaces deposited by electro or PVD in an ammonia solution [26,27].
Regarding the physical ones, sputtering is one of the most popular physical vapour deposition (PVD) methods used to fabricate films of metals, alloys, oxides, and nitrides [28,29,30,31]. Since the pioneering work of Terada et al. (1989) on epitaxial growth of copper nitride [32], reactive RF magnetron sputtering has become the most widely used mode for the fabrication of binary nitride. This method involves using a vacuum chamber in which a copper target is bombarded with high-energy ions, causing copper atoms to be ejected from the target and deposited onto a substrate to form a thin film. By introducing nitrogen gas, with or without argon gas, into the chamber during this process, Cu3N can be grown on a substrate. This method’s ease, simplicity, low cost, reproducibility and sustainability make it a very attractive choice for the growth of Cu3N thin films. Previous studies have already reported that by modifying the bias voltage [33], the type of substrate [32], the working pressure [34], and the RF power [35], the film properties can be adjusted, allowing the variation in optical, electrical, structural, and morphological features to suit them to the desired ones depending on the application field. In addition, in our previous works, we have demonstrated the strong effect of RF power on modifying the morphological, structural, and optical Cu3N characteristics, intending to use them as solar absorbers for next-generation photovoltaics [19].
In this work, we investigated the impact of the process gas and its pressure on the properties of Cu3N films prepared via reactive RF magnetron sputtering at room temperature (RT). Two different atmospheres were studied: an environment based on the mixture of N2 and Ar gases and another one based on a pure N2 gas, while the working pressures ranged from 1.0 to 5.0 Pa. The changes in crystalline nature, chemical composition, morphology, and electrical and optical properties were examined in depth. We aim to determine what material and sputtering deposition conditions lead to the most suitable properties and the highest possible absorption coefficient to be used as an absorber in a solar cell.

2. Materials and Methods

Cu3N thin films were deposited on different substrates, <100> polished n-type floating zone crystalline silicon (c-Si) wafers and 1737F Corning glass (Corning Inc., New York, NY, USA) via reactive RF magnetron sputtering in a commercial MVSystem LLC (Golden, CO, USA) mono-chamber sputtering system. The 3-inch diameter Cu target, with a purity of 99.99%, was from Lesker company (St. Leonards-on-Sea, East Sussex, UK). Before the sputtering deposition, the surface of the silicon wafer was prepared by removing the native silicon dioxide layer using a solution of 1% hydrofluoric acid (HF) in a mixture of deionised water and isopropyl alcohol. The wafer was immersed in this solution for 5 min. Next, the glass substrates were subjected to ultrasonic cleaning with ethanol and deionised water for 3 min. Then, they were submerged in isopropyl alcohol. Afterwards, all substrates were dried by blowing nitrogen gas over them.
The sputtering chamber was initially pumped to a base pressure of 2.6 × 10−5 Pa, and the distance between the target and substrate was set to 10 cm. A pre-sputtering process was performed for 5 min to clean the target surface. Then, the deposition was conducted for 30 min at room temperature (RT) and 50 W of RF power. The process gases used were N2 (99.9999%) and Ar (99.9999%), with flow rates of 20 sccm and 10 sccm, respectively, controlled using mass flow controllers from MKS Instruments (MKS Instruments, Andover, MA, USA). The total gas pressure was varied between 1.0 and 5.0 Pa by adjusting the position of the “butterfly” valve in the magnetron system. The thickness of the films was measured using a Dektak 8 profilometer (Bruker, San José, CA, USA). A tip force of 68.67 µN and a scan size of 2000 µm were used in all cases. To determine the crystallinity of the Cu3N films, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a commercial system (model PW3040/00 X’Pert MPD/MRD) (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) with Cu-kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). The 2θ range scanned was 10–60°, with a step size of 0.01° and a time of 20 s per step. The topography was analysed with a multimode nanoscope atomic force microscopy (AFM) model IIIA (SPM; Veeco Digital Instrument) in tapping mode using a silicon nitride AFM tip (OTR8, Veeco, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The surface roughness was quantified using mean root square (RMS) analysis, and the grain size from the two-dimensional (2D) AFM 1 × 1 µm2 images, using the Gwyddion software (Gwyddion software, http://gwyddion.net/ accessed on 20 March 2023).
In addition, the variation of surface morphology as a function of the gaseous environment used was determined using a JEOL JSM 7600F scanning microscope, equipped with a field emission Schottky electron gun (FESEM), in-lens secondary electron detector, and elemental analysis system for chemical composition EDS (energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy). Several surface regions were analysed at an acceleration voltage of 15 kV to quantitatively determine the amount of Cu and N in the thin film.
The molecular structure was determined using a dispersive spectrometer Confocal Raman microscope with capabilities for obtaining XYZ 3D confocal Raman images, equipped with a 532 nm laser, two diffraction gratings (600 and 1800 g/nm), three objectives (5×, 75× and 100×), and option to obtain photocurrent mappings (Horiba LabRam soleil, Longjumeau Cedex, France). This measurement provides valuable information about the sample’s vibrational modes and helps characterise its molecular structure. Finally, to determine the suitability of Cu3N as a solar absorber, the optical transmittance spectra were measured at normal incidence using a UV/VIS/NIR Perkin Elmer Lambda 1050 spectrophotometer. The optical band gap energies (Eg) were calculated from these spectra for indirect and direct transitions.
The optical properties of Cu3N thin films deposited on glass were analysed using UV-VIS-NIR optical spectroscopy and photothermal deflection spectroscopy (PDS). The transmittance (Topt) and reflectance (Ropt) spectra were obtained with a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV-Vis-NIR spectrometer equipped with an integrating sphere. While the transverse PDS setup used to measure weaker absorption consists of a 100 W tungsten halogen lamp, PTI 01-0002 monochromator (spectral range of 400–2000 nm), and Thorlabs MC1000 optical chopper (4 Hz light modulation frequency). A Signal Recovery 7265 lock-in amplifier was connected to a Hamamatsu C10442-02 PSD position-sensitive detector to measure the deflection of an MC6320C 10 mW laser probe beam. Samples were put in a quartz cell filled with Fluorinert TM FC-40. Topt and Ropt measurements allow for determining the optical absorbance (Aopt = 1 − ToptRopt) in the strong absorption region. In addition, the interference fringes observed in both spectra can be used to estimate the film thickness and their refractive index (n).
On the other hand, the PDS measurement is very effective for determining absorbance (APDS) in the weak (and very weak) absorption region. Thus, it is possible to determine the absorbance over a broad spectrum range by combining optical measurements with PDS. The absorption coefficient (α) is obtained by a fit based on the calculation of absorbance using the transfer matrix method (TMM). These measurements allow the determination of the most suitable sputtering conditions to achieve a more efficient solar absorber material.

3. Results

The Cu3N films in this study exhibited excellent physical stability and good adhesion to the respective substrate, even after exposure to ambient air; therefore, no evidence of cracking or peeling off was observed after the deposition process. Table 1 details the sputtering deposition conditions and the corresponding measured film thickness.
As observed, the deposition rate varied depending on the deposition conditions used, obtaining similar values to those reported by other authors [32,36]. These data reveal that the working pressure is essential in thin film fabrication. As the working pressure increases, the number of impacts between the sputtered species and gas atoms increases in sputtering processes. Thus, we observed that the deposition rate decreases with higher working pressure. This effect leads to a decrease in the deposition rate due to a reduction in the mean free path of the species within the plasma [3]. This trend was observed for the samples deposited in the N2 pure atmosphere, as shown in Figure 2. It is well known that there is an abrupt decrease in deposition rate due to the nitridation process that is more favoured at high gas pressures [37]. At the same time, the sputtering ratio Cu/N began to be higher when the N2 gas pressure decreased. This would favour the metallic regime and, hence, obtain a gradual increase in the sputtering yield at low working pressures. In addition, this would indicate that, under such values of N2 gas pressure, the target “poisoning” effect would not have started yet; hence, a gradual decrease in the deposition rate with the gas pressure was achieved.
On the other hand, it can be noticed that the films prepared under the N2/Ar gas mixture environment presented lower deposition rates than those prepared in N2 pure atmosphere. In the case where the sputtering process was carried out in a N2/Ar atmosphere, the decrease in the deposition rate was not so evident, remaining almost constant at 0.055 nm/s (see Figure 2). This could be attributed to a poorer nitridation occurring on the surface target due to the lower presence of N2 in the gas mixture. It should be pointed out that a significant increase was observed in the deposition rate at 3.5 Pa, reaching a value of 0.115 nm/s. This was attributed to the change in the preferred crystal structure orientation, specifically to the (111) plane, a plane of lower density that would lead to a rougher film with a lower refractive index, as will be shown later [3].
Figure 3 illustrates the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Cu3N deposited at the operating pressure range of 1.0–5.0 Pa in different environments: an N2 pure atmosphere (Figure 3a) and a gas mixture of N2/Ar (Figure 3b). All of the films exhibited a polycrystalline nature, characterised by an anti-ReO3 crystal structure, typical of cubic Cu3N (card number 00-047-1088), and hence, dominated with the Cu3N phase. Regardless of the working gas pressure used, the samples deposited in the N2 pure atmosphere showed the (100) plane as the preferred orientation (Figure 3a).
On the other hand, the patterns of the samples deposited in the N2/Ar gas mixture (Figure 3b) showed the appearance of (100), (110), (111), (200), and (220) diffraction peaks. In this case, and at low gas pressures, a weak (100) peak emerged over an amorphous hump caused by the glass substrate. At the pressure of 3.5 Pa, the film showed a (111) preferred orientation, while in the diffraction pattern of the sample deposited at 5.0 Pa, the (100) plane appeared as the most substantial peak. Other authors previously observed this change obtained in orientation. It could be attributed to the higher density of the N atoms that reached the substrate and reacted with the Cu atoms, leading to high-density Cu-N bonds for the preferential growth along the (100) direction. This can indicate that the nitridation was more effective when the gas pressure increased and, hence, the growth was favoured along the N-rich planes of Cu3N [38].
On the other hand, the constant lattice a was determined by calculating the interplanar spacing using Bragg’s law [39], expressed as the following Equation (1):
d h k l = a h 2 + k 2 + l 2
where d is the interplanar spacing, and h, k, and l are the Miller indices. Furthermore, the grain size ( τ ) was determined using the Debye–Scherrer Equation (2) [40] as follows:
τ = k λ β · cos θ B
where k is a constant (0.9), λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm), θ is the diffraction angle, and β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the predominant peak.
Table 2 and Table 3 summarise the FWHM of the main diffraction peak, the lattice constant, the predominant plane, the 2θ value, and the grain sizes derived from the XRD patterns of all the samples, depending on the N2 flow ratio.
It can be observed that the FWHM values for the samples deposited in the N2/Ar gas mixed atmosphere were superior to those for the samples deposited in the pure N2 atmosphere, indicating an improved quality for these last films. The same trend was obtained for the grain size, reaching values as high as 55 nm when the samples were fabricated in a pure N2 atmosphere. Concerning the lattice parameter, at the low pressures of 1.0 and 2.0 Pa, greater values than the theoretical one (0.38170 nm) were achieved, regardless of the N2 flow ratio used. This fact could indicate a move away from the stoichiometry condition for such samples [41].
Figure 4 pictures the plan-view FESEM and AFM 1 × 1 μm2 2D micrographs of the Cu3N thin films deposited in N2/Ar gas mixed atmosphere (Figure 4a) and pure N2 environment (Figure 4b). FESEM analysis revealed the presence of smooth and uniform surfaces, composed mainly of columnar grains, which are characteristic of the sputtering method [32,42,43]. These findings align with the results obtained from the AFM analysis [34,44,45], as shown in Figure 4.
The size of the grains was influenced by both the environment and the total pressure applied during the deposition process. It was observed that lower working pressures resulted in larger grain sizes. This phenomenon can be attributed to the formation of Cu3N crystallites and the adhesion of tiny copper crystals, possibly caused by a decrease in N2 density. These observations are supported by grain size calculations performed using the commercial software Gwyddion. This result could be reinforced with the grain size values calculated with the Debye–Scherrer equation in XRD.
Table 4 and Table 5 summarise the grain size and surface roughness RMS of the Cu3N films, calculated from the 2D AFM micrographs using the Gwyddion software, depending on the N2 flow ratio.
Based on these findings, it can be concluded that regardless of the total working pressure and N2 flow ratio used, the surfaces were very flat, presenting RMS values that did not exceed 3 nm. In this sense, it can be noted that even though the RMS was very low, there was a difference between the films deposited using pure N2 gas and those deposited in the N2/Ar gas mixture, obtaining slightly smoother surfaces in the first case. On the other hand, the grain size varied depending on the process parameters. Larger sizes as working pressure increased. The larger grain sizes obtained for the films deposited at 1.0 Pa and 2.0 Pa in a mixture of N/Ar gases may be due to the formation of small agglomerates due to the amorphous character seen in XRD. It should be pointed out that the grain size values estimated from XRD patterns were slightly higher than the obtained from AFM measurements. This can be explained because the first ones were an average value of a larger area analysed, while the second ones were calculated in a small area at a specific point.
The chemical composition of the samples was determined qualitatively using EDS data (Table 6). The analysis revealed a Cu/N ratio below three, indicating the non-stoichiometry of the deposited material. Interestingly, an increased Cu/N ratio was observed at higher working pressures. This phenomenon can be attributed to the increased energy of the nitrogen atoms at higher working pressures, enhancing the formation of bonds with the copper atoms. Moreover, all Cu3N films exhibited the presence of trace amounts of oxygen. This observation may be associated with exposure to ambient oxygen, as observed in the Raman analysis but not detected in XRD patterns.
Figure 5 displays the Raman spectra of the Cu3N films deposited at different working pressures and N2 flow ratios of 0.7 (Figure 5a) and 1.0 (Figure 5b). Cu3N has a crystal structure belonging to the Pm-3m space group where the unit cell contains one formula unit. As a result, no first-order Raman signal is expected for a perfect cubic Cu3N. Although theoretical calculations suggest the absence of active Raman modes, the possibility of modes arising due to the breakdown of the selection rule cannot be ruled out. This is due to CuxN(1−x)’s highly non-stoichiometric nature and the breakdown in crystal symmetry caused by defects in the structure. The prominent Raman peak around 619–627 cm−1 in Figure 5 corresponds to the stretching of the Cu-N bond, characteristic of Cu3N [41,46,47]. A slight shift of that Raman peak was observed as the working pressure varied, while the Raman shift value tends to move to lower ones when using the N2/Ar gas mixture, compared to using the pure N2 gas in the deposition process.
Furthermore, Raman shifts of CuO2 and CuO also appeared in the spectra at 94 cm−1, 150 cm−1, and 295 cm−1, respectively. The samples prepared in the N2/Ar gas mixture showed a higher presence of different copper oxides that may have formed on the film surface upon contact with atmospheric air and/or within the crystal structure. In order to analyse the Raman signal derived from the presence of these types of oxides, these measurements were complemented with the XRD data. As a result, it was confirmed that the characteristic 2θ peaks of CuO2 and CuO at 36.5° and 35.5°, respectively [48], did not appear in any diffraction patterns, reinforcing our prediction that the oxidation process would be happening due to environmental causes. However, the role of oxygen impurities cannot be ignored, as oxygen always remains an unintentional impurity in nitride-based materials [49]. Therefore, a more detailed theoretical analysis is required to interpret and assign the active Raman peak appropriately. Table 7 and Table 8 show the prepared samples’ Raman shift values and FWHM.
The position of the main peak and the FWHM were calculated by simulating via the OriginLab program (OriginPro 8, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). As observed, the FWHM value decreased as the working pressure increased, suggesting that the lower the FWHM value, the lower the nitrogen concentration in the sample. There is an exception for the sample prepared in the gas mixture at 3.5 Pa, where the FWHM did not exhibit that tendency, attributed to its structural change to the (111) preferential plane revealed by its XRD pattern. However, this sample does not follow that trend. In summary, these results obtained from XRD and Raman show that the films with superior quality that could serve as solar absorbers are those prepared in the pure N2 atmosphere and at pressures of 3.5 Pa and 5.0 Pa. Furthermore, these films exhibited a less variety of grain orientations, with a predominant (100) plane and the Raman shift values were closer to the formation of the theoretical bonding structure.
Optical properties were determined from transmittance and reflectance spectra obtained using UV-Vis-NIR spectroscopy and shown in Figure 6. The transmittance spectra showed high transmittance in the NIR region (>700 nm), which gradually decreased in the VIS range (450–700 nm), reaching very low values in the UV range (300–400 nm).
For most samples, a minimum transmittance was observed in the transparent region (>700 nm), corresponding to a maximum reflectance. This is an apparent effect due to interference from multiple reflections inside the films because of the samples’ homogeneity and flatness, and, thanks to that. The light maintains its coherence in the internal reflections. It should be noted that the thin thickness of the films (<200 nm) limits the number of interferences observed in the spectra (in fact, the maximum transmittance beyond 2500 nm, which should be about 92% according to the refractive index of the glass, is not observed in any case). However, the detection of the minimum of Topt (or a maximum of Ropt) is sufficient to determine, by the fit of Topt (or Ropt) in the transparent region, the thickness and refractive index (n) of the films.
Table 9 summarises the optical parameters obtained. It can be observed that the thickness values obtained from the adjustments of the optical spectra were slightly superior to the measured with profilometry (data in Table 1). This disparity in thickness could be attributed to how this value is determined because profilometry provides direct thickness measurements, whereas PDS relies on indirect one.
The refractive index values were in the range of 2.4–3.0, which is consistent with the values typically reported for Cu3N [50]. It can be noticed that higher refractive index values were obtained for the samples deposited at lower total pressures, regardless of the atmosphere used in the film deposition. This phenomenon can be attributed to the higher Cu content in the samples deposited at lower working pressures. This assumption can also be supported by examining the XRD diffractograms and EDS analysis.
The absorption coefficient (α) in the strong absorption region can be calculated with reasonable accuracy from the absorbance Aopt, reflectance Ropt and thickness d of the film as follows:
α 1 d ln 1 A o p t 1 R o p t
In the weak absorption region, Equation (3) is unsuitable for estimating α because of multiple reflections. However, in this case, assuming that the refractive index is practically constant (n ≈ n), it is possible to derive α a wide range of the spectrum (from about 3.5 eV to 0.5 eV).
Figure 7a shows the Aopt and Apds spectra for the Cu3N samples deposited at 5.0 Pa and N2/Ar gas mixture. As can be seen, the determination of Aopt at wavelengths longer than 800 nm is unreliable (the error in the measurement of Topt and Ropt is of the order of Aopt). However, the PDS measurement in this region allows us to obtain the absorbance, Apds. Figure 7b shows the absorption coefficient spectrum obtained by combining the calculation according to Equation (3) for the intense absorption region (α > 1/d) and the TMM model fit for the weak absorption region.
Once α was obtained, the indirect and direct optical band gaps of Cu3N were obtained using the Tauc plot:
α h ν 1 / m = B h ν E g
where is the photon energy, Eg is the band gap energy, B is a constant, and m is a factor, which depends on the nature of the electron transition (2 for indirectly allowed transitions and 1/2 for direct allowed transitions). Figure 8 shows the Tauc plots with m = 2 and m =1/2 of the different Cu3N samples deposited at different pressures in the two environments. The decrease in total pressure implies a decrease in both band gaps. This effect was more significant in the samples deposited on the N2/Ar mixture.
Trying to further analysis, different energy ranges were distinguished according to the behaviour of α. Thus, the electronic transitions associated with the direct band gap took place for photon energies in a narrow range from 2.1 to 2.4 eV, as a lower limit, to approximately 2.5 eV, as an upper limit. On the other hand, the electronic transitions associated with the indirect gap cover a larger range extending about 0.5 eV toward lower photon energies. In addition, at lower energies, exponential Urbach absorption (αU) can be observed, which is related to electronic transitions involving the band tails.
To accurately determine the direct and indirect band gaps, we performed a fine least-squares fit of the spectral dependence α according to the following model:
At   h   <   E 1 : α U h ν = α 0 exp h ν / E U
where E1 is the transition energy, EU is the Urbach energy (the slope of the exponential tail), and α0 is the absorption prefactor.
At   h   >   E 2 : α d h ν = B d h ν E g d ( direct   Tauc   model )
E2 is the transition energy, Bd is a constant, and E g d is the direct band gap energy.
At   E 1   <   h   <   E 2 α i h ν = B i h ν E g i 2 ( indirect   Tauc   model )
Bi is a constant, and E g i is the indirect band gap energy. On the other hand, it can be observed that α must vary continuously and smoothly through the different regions. This implies imposing continuity conditions for α and its derivative at the two transition energies:
α i E 1 = α U E 1         d α i d E E 1 = d α U d E α U E 1 α i E 2 = α d E 2         d α i d E E 2 = d α d d E α U E 2            
which reduces the eight parameters of the model described by Equations (5)–(7) to only four independent ones. The graphs in Figure 9 depict the fit of the experimental data with the model described by Equations (5)–(8). A correlation between these energies and total pressure was observed, the effect more measurable for the samples deposited in the mixed N2/Ar atmosphere. The inset in Figure 8 pictures the fit in the sub-gap region at the edge of the indirect band gap at E1, plotted in a logarithmic scale. This is the region where the absorption coefficient is described by the Urbach exponential, related to the states in the band tails. The same as was deduced from the Tauc plots in Figure 7, the samples with the narrowest band gap (direct and indirect) were obtained at the lowest total pressures. Therefore, by modifying the deposition parameters, such as total working pressure and N2 flow ratio, the optical properties of Cu3N thin films can be tailored to achieve desirable properties, making them promising for applications in optoelectronics and photonics.
Finally, the shaded regions in Figure 10 represent the range of photon energies (E1 < < E2) associated with the electronic transition by the indirect gap. In general, there is an increasing tendency for the band gap with the total pressure.
Regarding the Urbach energy (EU), increasing values were obtained as the total pressure decreased. These values were superior to those of other semiconductor materials [20]. It is known that high EU values indicate a higher internal defect density, while lower Eu ones suggest a lower internal defect density. Hence, the Urbach band tail is related to impurity adsorption [51,52]. According to the literature, Cu3N shows EU values ranging from 105 to 238 meV [20,51] depending on the substrate temperature. Therefore, it can be concluded that the samples deposited at higher total pressures feature reasonable band gap energies and EU values to be used in photovoltaic applications.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the Cu3N films were successfully deposited on glass substrates via RF magnetron sputtering using a power of 50 W and different N2 flow ratios to determine their effect on the film properties. The results provide valuable insights into these films’ optical and structural properties. The analysis of the film structure revealed polycrystallinity, with a preferred growth orientation along the (100) plane when the N2 flow ratio was r = 1.0. However, an amorphous matrix was observed for an N2 flow ratio of 0.7 and low total working pressures up to 2.0 Pa; at working pressures above 2.0 Pa, a tendency for growth along the (111) plane was obtained. These findings and the lattice parameter values extracted from the XRD patterns suggest that the films deposited in the N2/Ar gas mixture tend to have a higher concentration of copper. Raman characterisation confirmed the formation of Cu-N bonds, as evidenced by the characteristic peak observed in these spectra. The presence of oxygen in the Raman spectra and in the EDS analysis was attributed to environmental factors due to no Cu-O bond-related structures detected in the XRD patterns. The Cu/N ratio demonstrated an increase in the total working pressure. FESEM and AFM analysis showed a film morphology consisting of columnar grains with a very smooth and homogeneous surface. Through a combined analysis of the optical properties using conventional UV-VIS-NIR and PDS spectroscopies the absorption coefficient over a wide range of photon energies (from 0.5 eV to 3.5 eV) was determined. A model with two band gaps, indirect and direct, and the Urbach exponential tail in the sub-gap region described the complete absorption coefficient spectrum. Depending on the deposition conditions, the energy of the direct gap varied in the range of 1.1 to 1.5 eV and the direct gap in the range of 1.9–2.2 eV. Generally, as the working pressure decreased, the energies of the two gaps tended to decrease, with the effect being most evident in the layers deposited in the N2/Ar gas mixture environment. The samples deposited with the lowest working pressure (1 Pa) presented the highest value of the Urbach energy (>250 meV). The minimum value of the Urbach energy of 183 meV was found for the sample deposited at 2 Pa in a pure N2 atmosphere. Finally, these films exhibited desirable structural, morphological, and optical properties, making them promising candidates as solar absorbers. The findings could contribute to developing and optimising Cu3N-based materials for efficient solar energy conversion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.R.-T. and S.F.; methodology, M.I.R.-T. and S.F.; software, J.M.A.; validation, M.I.R.-T., M.R. and J.M.A.; formal analysis, M.R., J.M.A., J.M. and M.I.R.-T.; investigation, M.I.R.-T. and S.F.; resources, J.B. and S.F.; data curation, M.I.R.-T., M.R. and J.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.I.R.-T., M.R. and J.M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.I.R.-T., M.R., J.M.A., J.B. and S.F.; visualization, M.I.R.-T., J.M.A. and M.R.; supervision, S.F.; project administration, J.B. and S.F.; funding acquisition, J.B. and S.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, grant number PID2019-109215RB-C42 and PID2019-109215RB-C43. M.I.R.-T. also acknowledges partial funding from MEDIDA C17.I2G: CIEMAT. Nuevas tecnologías renovables híbridas, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Componente 17 “Reforma Institucional y Fortalecimiento de las Capacidades del Sistema Nacional de Ciencia e Innovación”. Medidas del plan de inversiones y reformas para la recuperación económica funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank A. Soubrié from Centro de Microscopía Electrónica “Luis Bru” for her help and advice in AFM measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Evans, H.A.; Wu, Y.; Seshadri, R.; Cheetham, A.K. Perovskite-related ReO3-type structures. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 196–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zachwieja, U.; Jacobs, H. Ammonothermalsynthese von kupfernitrid, Cu3N. J. Less Common Met. 1990, 161, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yue, G.H.; Yan, P.X.; Liu, J.Z.; Wang, M.X.; Li, M.; Yuan, X.M. Copper nitride thin film prepared by reactive radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 103506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Matsuzaki, K.; Okazaki, T.; Lee, Y.-S.; Hosono, H.; Susaki, T. Controlled bipolar doping in Cu3N (100) thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 222102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Matsuzaki, K.; Harada, K.; Kumagai, Y.; Koshiya, S.; Kimoto, K.; Ueda, S.; Sasase, M.; Maeda, A.; Susaki, T.; Kitano, M.; et al. High-Mobility p-Type and n-Type Copper Nitride Semiconductors by Direct Nitriding Synthesis and In Silico Doping Design. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1801968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, N.; Ji, A.; Cao, Z. Nearly constant electrical resistance over large temperature range in Cu3NMx (M = Cu, Ag, Au) compounds. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, S.-C.; Huang, S.-Y.; Sakalley, S.; Paliwal, A.; Chen, Y.-H.; Liao, M.-H.; Sun, H.; Biring, S. Optoelectronic properties of Cu3N thin films deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering and its diode rectification characteristics. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 789, 428–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Momin, M.A.; Roy, A.; Das, S.C.; Majumdar, A. Optical and Electronic Structural Properties of Cu3N Thin Films: A First-Principles Study (LDA + U). ACS Omega 2020, 5, 31918–31924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tanveer, Z.; Mahmood, K.; Ikram, S.; Ali, A.; Amin, N. Modulation of thermoelectric properties of thermally evaporated copper nitride thin films by optimizing the growth parameters. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2021, 605, 412712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matsuzaki, K.; Katase, T.; Kamiya, T.; Hosono, H. Symmetric ambipolar thin-film transistors and high-gain CMOS-like inverters using environmentally friendly copper nitride. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 35132–35137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ścigała, A.; Szłyk, E.; Dobrzańska, L.; Gregory, D.H.; Szczęsny, R. From binary to multinary copper based nitrides–Unlocking the potential of new applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 436, 213791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, W.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B.; Li, B.; Li, Z. Characterization of Cu3N/CuO thin films derived from annealed Cu3N for electrode application in Li-ion batteries. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 672, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, H.; Chen, W. Copper nitride nanocubes: Size-controlled synthesis and application as cathode catalyst in alkaline fuel cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15236–15239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lee, B.S.; Yi, M.; Chu, S.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Kwon, H.R.; Lee, K.R.; Kang, D.; Kim, W.S.; Lim, H.B.; Lee, J. Copper nitride nanoparticles supported on a superparamagnetic mesoporous microsphere for toxic-free click chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 3935–3937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yin, Z.; Yu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, X.; Shen, M.; Li, N.; Muzzio, M.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Lin, H.; et al. Cu3N Nanocubes for Selective Electrochemical Reduction of CO(2) to Ethylene. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 8658–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghoohestani, M.; Karimipour, M.; Javdani, Z. The effect of pressure on the physical properties of Cu3N. Phys. Scr. 2014, 89, 35801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sahoo, G.; Meher, S.; Jain, M.K. Room temperature growth of high crystalline quality Cu3N thin films by modified activated reactive evaporation. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2015, 191, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Noh, H.; An, H.; Lee, J.; Song, J.; Hong, H.J.; Seo, S.; Jeong, S.Y.; Kim, B.-J.; Ryu, S.; Lee, S. Large enhancement of the photocurrent density in N-doped Cu3N films through bandgap reduction. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2020, 57, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rodríguez-Tapiador, M.I.; Merino, J.; Jawhari, T.; Muñoz-Rosas, A.L.; Bertomeu, J.; Fernández, S. Impact of the RF Power on the Copper Nitride Films Deposited Nitrogen Environment for Applications as Eco-Friendly Solar Absrober. Materials 2023, 16, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Birkett, M.; Savory, C.N.; Fioretti, A.N.; Thompson, P.; Muryn, C.A.; Weerakkody, A.D.; Mitrovic, I.Z.; Hall, S.; Treharne, R.; Dhanak, V.R.; et al. Atypically small temperature-dependence of the direct band gap in the metastable semiconductor copper nitrideCu3N. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 115201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pinkas, J.; Huffman, J.C.; Baxter, D.V.; Chisholm, M.H.; Caulton, K.G. Mechanistic Role of H2O and the Ligand in the Chemical Vapor Deposition of Cu, Cu2O, CuO, and Cu3N from Bis (1, 1, 1, 5, 5, 5-hexafluoropentane-2, 4-dionato) copper (II). Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fallberg, A.; Ottosson, M.; Carlsson, J.-O. CVD of Copper(I) Nitride. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2009, 15, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Modin, A.; Kvashnina, K.O.; Butorin, S.M.; Werme, L.; Nordgren, J.; Arapan, S.; Ahuja, R.; Fallberg, A.; Ottosson, M. Electronic structure of Cu3N films studied by soft x-ray spectroscopy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2008, 20, 235212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Paniconi, G.; Stoeva, Z.; Doberstein, H.; Smith, R.I.; Gallagher, B.L.; Gregory, D.H. Structural chemistry of Cu3N powders obtained by ammonolysis reactions. Solid State Sci. 2007, 9, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Szczesny, R.; Hoang, T.K.A.; Dobrzanska, L.; Gregory, D.H. Solution/Ammonolysis Syntheses of Unsupported and Silica-Supported Copper(I) Nitride Nanostructures from Oxidic Precursors. Molecules 2021, 26, 4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Scigala, A.; Szlyk, E.; Rerek, T.; Wisniewski, M.; Skowronski, L.; Trzcinski, M.; Szczesny, R. Copper Nitride Nanowire Arrays-Comparison of Synthetic Approaches. Materials 2021, 14, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xia, Y.; Fan, G.; Chen, K.; Chen, Y.; He, Z.; Ou, J. Preparation and anti-corrosion performances of grass-like microstructured superhydrophobic surface on copper via solution-immersion. Mater. Lett. 2022, 323, 132482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kashin, A.; Ananikov, V. A SEM study of nanosized metal films and metal nanoparticles obtained by magnetron sputtering. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2011, 60, 2602–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Padamata, S.K.; Yasinskiy, A.; Yanov, V.; Saevarsdottir, G. Magnetron Sputtering High-Entropy Alloy Coatings: A Mini-Review. Metals 2022, 12, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tadjine, R.; Houimi, A.; Alim, M.M.; Oudini, N. Oxygen flow rate effect on copper oxide thin films deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Film. 2022, 741, 139013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, D.-C.; Kuo, D.-H.; Kao, J.-Y.; Chen, C.-S.; Tsao, C.-C.; Hsu, C.-Y. Fabrication of nitride films by co-sputtering of high-entropy alloys and tungsten. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 59, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Islam, M.M.; Georgiev, D.G. Stable stoichiometric copper nitride thin films via reactive sputtering. Appl. Phys. A 2022, 128, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kong, Q.; Ji, L.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhou, H. Influence of substrate bias voltage on the microstructure and residual stress of CrN films deposited by medium frequency magnetron sputtering. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2011, 176, 850–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Figueira, C.; Rosario, G.D.; Pugliese, D.; Rodríguez-Tapiador, M.; Fernández, S. Effect of Argon on the Properties of Copper Nitride Fabricated by Magnetron Sputtering for the Next Generation of Solar Absorbers. Materials 2022, 15, 8973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rodríguez-Tapiador, M.; Merino, J.; Jawhari, T.; Muñoz-Rosas, A.; Bertomeu, J.; Fernández, S. Power effect on the properties of copper nitride films as solar absorber deposited in pure nitrogen atmosphere. Authorea Prepr. 2022; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghosh, S.; Singh, F.; Choudhary, D.; Avasthi, D.; Ganesan, V.; Shah, P.; Gupta, A. Effect of substrate temperature on the physical properties of copper nitride films by rf reactive sputtering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2001, 142, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abe, T.; Yamashina, T. The deposition rate of metallic thin films in the reactive sputtering process. Thin Solid Film. 1975, 30, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dorranian, D.; Dejam, L.; Sari, A.H.; Hojabri, A. Structural and optical properties of copper nitride thin films in a reactive Ar/N2magnetron sputtering system. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 50, 20503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hadian, F.; Rahmati, A.; Movla, H.; Khaksar, M. Reactive DC magnetron sputter deposited copper nitride nano-crystalline thin films: Growth and characterization. Vacuum 2012, 86, 1067–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiao, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, A. Structure, optical property and thermal stability of copper nitride films prepared by reactive radio frequency magnetron sputtering. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2011, 27, 403–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nowakowska-Langier, K.; Chodun, R.; Minikayev, R.; Okrasa, S.; Strzelecki, G.W.; Wicher, B.; Zdunek, K. Phase composition of copper nitride coatings examined by the use of X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1165, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alyousef, H.A.; Hassan, A.; Zakaly, H.M. Exploring the Impact of Substrate Placement on Cu3N Thin Films as a Solar Cell Window Layer: Structural and Optical Attributes. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 106183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Paredes, P.; Rauwel, E.; Rauwel, P. Surveying the Synthesis, Optical Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of Cu3N Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Y.-H.; Lee, P.-I.; Sakalley, S.; Wen, C.-K.; Cheng, W.-C.; Sun, H.; Chen, S.-C. Enhanced Electrical Properties of Copper Nitride Films Deposited via High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, K.; Kumar, A.; Devi, S.; Tyagi, S.; Kaur, D. Relevant photovoltaic effect in N-doped CQDs/MoS2 (0D/2D) quantum dimensional heterostructure. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 14107–14116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fallberg, A.; Ottosson, M.; Carlsson, J.-O. Phase stability and oxygen doping in the Cu–N–O system. J. Cryst. Growth 2010, 312, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wilczopolska, M.; Nowakowska-Langier, K.; Okrasa, S.; Skowronski, L.; Minikayev, R.; Strzelecki, G.W.; Chodun, R.; Zdunek, K. Synthesis of copper nitride layers by the pulsed magnetron sputtering method carried out under various operating conditions. Materials 2021, 14, 2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sanjana, T.; Sunil, M.A.; Shaik, H.; Kumar, K.N. Studies on DC sputtered cuprous oxide thin films for solar cell absorber layers. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 281, 125922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zervos, M.; Othonos, A.; Pavloudis, T.; Giaremis, S.; Kioseoglou, J.; Mavridou, K.; Katsikini, M.; Pinakidou, F.; Paloura, E.C. Impact of Oxygen on the Properties of Cu3N and Cu3−xN1−xOx. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 3680–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rahmati, A.; Ghoohestani, M.; Badehian, H.; Baizaee, M.A. initio study of the structural, elastic, electronic and optical properties of Cu3N. Mater. Res. 2014, 17, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiao, J.; Qi, M.; Gong, C.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, A.; Ma, J.; Cheng, Y. Crystal structure and optical properties of silver-doped copper nitride films (Cu3N: Ag) prepared by magnetron sputtering. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 55305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borsa, D.; Grachev, S.; Presura, C.; Boerma, D. Growth and properties of Cu3N films and Cu3N/γ’-Fe4N bilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 1823–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Some applications of Cu3N films in different technological fields.
Figure 1. Some applications of Cu3N films in different technological fields.
Coatings 13 01094 g001
Figure 2. Deposition rate to different N2 flow ratios of 0.7 and 1.0 and to different total working pressure (Pa). Deposition conditions of Cu3N films: RT and Prf = 50 W.
Figure 2. Deposition rate to different N2 flow ratios of 0.7 and 1.0 and to different total working pressure (Pa). Deposition conditions of Cu3N films: RT and Prf = 50 W.
Coatings 13 01094 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction spectra of Cu3N films at different gas pressures (Pa) and nitrogen flow ratios. (a) [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.7 and (b) [N2] r = 1.0.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction spectra of Cu3N films at different gas pressures (Pa) and nitrogen flow ratios. (a) [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.7 and (b) [N2] r = 1.0.
Coatings 13 01094 g003
Figure 4. Top view FESEM images: Magn. 90,000×; 100 nm, and AFM 1 × 1 μm2 2D micrographs. (a) [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.7 and (b) [N2] r = 1.0.
Figure 4. Top view FESEM images: Magn. 90,000×; 100 nm, and AFM 1 × 1 μm2 2D micrographs. (a) [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.7 and (b) [N2] r = 1.0.
Coatings 13 01094 g004
Figure 5. Raman spectra for Cu3N films deposited at different pressures on glass. (a) [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.7 and (b) [N2] r = 1.0.
Figure 5. Raman spectra for Cu3N films deposited at different pressures on glass. (a) [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.7 and (b) [N2] r = 1.0.
Coatings 13 01094 g005
Figure 6. Transmittance and reflectance spectra of Cu3N films deposited at different pressures and atmospheres.
Figure 6. Transmittance and reflectance spectra of Cu3N films deposited at different pressures and atmospheres.
Coatings 13 01094 g006
Figure 7. Absorbance obtained from optical measurements and PDS for the Cu3N film deposited at 5.0 Pa pressure in pure N2 atmosphere. In (A), the absorbance spectra are shown, and in (B), the absorption coefficient is calculated from the fit based on the transfer matrix method. The insets show the same graphs on a linear scale.
Figure 7. Absorbance obtained from optical measurements and PDS for the Cu3N film deposited at 5.0 Pa pressure in pure N2 atmosphere. In (A), the absorbance spectra are shown, and in (B), the absorption coefficient is calculated from the fit based on the transfer matrix method. The insets show the same graphs on a linear scale.
Coatings 13 01094 g007
Figure 8. A plot of (αhν)1/2 and (αhν)2 vs. photon energy (eV) for the Cu3N films at different gas pressures and atmospheres. For ease of comparison, normalised values of the absorption coefficient are considered.
Figure 8. A plot of (αhν)1/2 and (αhν)2 vs. photon energy (eV) for the Cu3N films at different gas pressures and atmospheres. For ease of comparison, normalised values of the absorption coefficient are considered.
Coatings 13 01094 g008
Figure 9. Absorption coefficient spectra of Cu3N layers at different pressures and atmospheres. The red dashed lines show the fit according to the model equations described (5)–(8). In the logarithmic scale, the insets show the exponential tail of the Urbach region; note the effect of pressure on the transition energy E1.
Figure 9. Absorption coefficient spectra of Cu3N layers at different pressures and atmospheres. The red dashed lines show the fit according to the model equations described (5)–(8). In the logarithmic scale, the insets show the exponential tail of the Urbach region; note the effect of pressure on the transition energy E1.
Coatings 13 01094 g009
Figure 10. Evolution with a working pressure of the energies of the direct gap Eg(d) and the indirect gap Eg(i) for the two deposition atmospheres. The shaded region indicates the range of photon energies (E1 < < E2) associated with electronic transitions according to the indirect gap: for higher energies ( > E2), the transitions are associated with the direct gap and for lower energies ( < E1) with the Urbach tail.
Figure 10. Evolution with a working pressure of the energies of the direct gap Eg(d) and the indirect gap Eg(i) for the two deposition atmospheres. The shaded region indicates the range of photon energies (E1 < < E2) associated with electronic transitions according to the indirect gap: for higher energies ( > E2), the transitions are associated with the direct gap and for lower energies ( < E1) with the Urbach tail.
Coatings 13 01094 g010
Table 1. Deposition conditions of Cu3N films, varying N2 flow ratios (0.7 and 1.0) and different total pressures.
Table 1. Deposition conditions of Cu3N films, varying N2 flow ratios (0.7 and 1.0) and different total pressures.
Total Pressure (Pa)N2 FluxAr FluxN2 Flow RatioDeposition Rate (nm/s)Thickness (nm)
1.020100.70.05395 ± 5
2.020100.70.05496 ± 7
3.520100.70.115207 ± 18
5.020100.70.05598 ± 2
1.02001.00.091164 ± 12
2.02001.00.065118 ± 20
3.52001.00.060109 ± 16
5.02001.00.058104 ± 20
Table 2. XRD data extracted from the XRD spectra of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a mixed N2/Ar atmosphere.
Table 2. XRD data extracted from the XRD spectra of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a mixed N2/Ar atmosphere.
N2 Flow Ratio: 0.7
Working pressure (Pa)1.0 *2.0 *3.55.0
2θ (°)23.0322.9740.7323.23
Predominant direction *--(111)(100)
Lattice parameter a (nm)0.38580.38720.38130.3814
FWHM (°)0.240.240.530.31
Grain size (nm)34341627
* Poor crystalline quality. Preferential orientation is not easy to identify.
Table 3. XRD data extracted from the XRD spectra of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a pure N2 atmosphere.
Table 3. XRD data extracted from the XRD spectra of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a pure N2 atmosphere.
N2 Flow Ratio: 1.0
Working pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
2θ (°)22.7723.1723.2923.28
Predominant direction(100)(100)(100)(100)
Lattice parameter a (nm)0.39030.38400.38100.3813
FWHM (°)0.200.150.210.21
Grain size (nm)40553940
Table 4. Surface roughness RMS and grain size calculated from AFM 1 × 1 μm2 images of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a mixed N2/Ar atmosphere.
Table 4. Surface roughness RMS and grain size calculated from AFM 1 × 1 μm2 images of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a mixed N2/Ar atmosphere.
N2 Flow Ratio: 0.7
Working pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
RMS (nm)1.39 ± 0.151.26 ± 0.142.77 ± 0.231.77 ± 0.21
Grain size (nm)40 ± 235 ± 330 ± 334 ± 3
Table 5. Surface roughness RMS and grain size calculated from AFM 1 × 1 μm2 images of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a pure N2 atmosphere.
Table 5. Surface roughness RMS and grain size calculated from AFM 1 × 1 μm2 images of the Cu3N films fabricated on glass via RF magnetron sputtering in a pure N2 atmosphere.
N2 Flow Ratio: 1.0
Working pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
RMS (nm)0.90 ± 0.151.15 ± 0.502.21 ± 0.271.34 ± 0.12
Grain size (nm)19 ± 232 ± 233 ± 235 ± 2
Table 6. The EDS analysis provided insights into the relative surface composition of the examined films.
Table 6. The EDS analysis provided insights into the relative surface composition of the examined films.
Working Pressures1.0 Pa2.0 Pa3.5 Pa5.0 Pa
Cu/N ratio [N2]/[N2 + Ar] r = 0.71.792.082.102.17
Cu/N ratio [N2] r = 1.01.871.882.072.13
Table 7. Raman peak position and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the Cu3N films at different pressures on glass in a mixed N2/Ar atmosphere.
Table 7. Raman peak position and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the Cu3N films at different pressures on glass in a mixed N2/Ar atmosphere.
N2 Flow Ratio: 0.7
Working pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
FWHM (cm−1)78.9 ± 2.876.8 ± 1.882.9 ± 3.468.1 ± 2.7
Peak position (cm−1)618.0 ± 1.2621.0 ± 0.4619.0 ± 0.6621.0 ± 0.6
Table 8. Raman peak position and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the Cu3N films at different pressures on glass in a pure N2 atmosphere.
Table 8. Raman peak position and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the Cu3N films at different pressures on glass in a pure N2 atmosphere.
N2 Flow Ratio: 1.0
Working pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
FWHM (cm−1)82.9 ± 1.774.9 ± 2.068.0 ± 3.665.2 ± 1.3
Peak position (cm−1)623.0 ± 0.3625.0 ± 0.4626.0 ± 0.5627.0 ± 0.4
Table 9. Obtained values of the optical properties of Cu3N films deposited on glass analysed via UV-VIS-NIR optical spectroscopy and PDS at different N2 flow ratios.
Table 9. Obtained values of the optical properties of Cu3N films deposited on glass analysed via UV-VIS-NIR optical spectroscopy and PDS at different N2 flow ratios.
N2 Flow Ratio: 0.7
Working Pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
Optical fit parameters
Film thickness (nm)110123173125
Refractive index n3.052.652.442.45
Band gap fit parameters
Transition energy E2 (eV)2.182.272.382.46
Direct band gap E g d (eV)1.912.022.092.22
Indirect band gap E g i (eV)1.101.281.221.53
Urbach fit parameters
Transition energy E1 (eV)1.551.691.641.90
Urbach energy EU (meV)261233243205
Absorption coefficient at E1 (cm−1)6.3 × 1045.1 × 1044.0 × 1045.2 × 104
N2 flow ratio: 1.0
Working Pressure (Pa)1.02.03.55.0
Optical fit parameters
Film thickness (nm)10965126123
Refractive index n2.852.792.432.43
Band gap fit parameters
Transition energy E2 (eV)2.302.252.422.37
Direct band gap E g d (eV)2.052.062.212.15
Indirect band gap E g i (eV)1.301.481.551.49
Urbach fit parameters
Transition energy E1 (eV)1.741.821.961.88
Urbach energy EU (meV)253186229217
Absorption coefficient at E1 (cm−1)8.0 × 1046.5 × 1046.0 × 1045.3 × 104
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodríguez-Tapiador, M.I.; Asensi, J.M.; Roldán, M.; Merino, J.; Bertomeu, J.; Fernández, S. Copper Nitride: A Versatile Semiconductor with Great Potential for Next-Generation Photovoltaics. Coatings 2023, 13, 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13061094

AMA Style

Rodríguez-Tapiador MI, Asensi JM, Roldán M, Merino J, Bertomeu J, Fernández S. Copper Nitride: A Versatile Semiconductor with Great Potential for Next-Generation Photovoltaics. Coatings. 2023; 13(6):1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13061094

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodríguez-Tapiador, M. I., J. M. Asensi, M. Roldán, J. Merino, J. Bertomeu, and S. Fernández. 2023. "Copper Nitride: A Versatile Semiconductor with Great Potential for Next-Generation Photovoltaics" Coatings 13, no. 6: 1094. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13061094

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop